Traumatic peripheral vascular injuries

Summary 2–4 % of vascular injuries need operative reconstruktion. In polytraumatized patients the rate is even 10 %. Arterial vascular repair should precede venous reconstruction and orthopaedic stabilization due to limb threatening ischemia. Penetration or blunt vascular trauma result either in acute blood loss, ischemia or compartmental compression. Reperfusion syndrom leads to vital threat of patient. Clinical assessment, measurement of limb pressures using a Doppler device and use of duplex ultrasonography are reliable adjuncts in the rapid evaluation. Arteriography is rarely indicated and should be spared for patients with abnormal physical examination. Minimizing ischemia (6–8 h) is an important factor in maximizing limb salvage. Vascular repair include direct anastomosis or lateral suture repair mostly combined with primary shortening of the extremity. In most cases autogenous vein graft is required. Rethrombosis, arteriovenous fistula and pseudoaneurysms are possible complications. Stabilisation of the fracture has priority over vascular reconstruction. The initial steps to success are surgical debridement, adequate bony stabilization mostly by external fixation, revascularisation of vascular injury, immediate fascial decompression and early soft-tissue reconstruction. The best results are obtained when a multidiciplinary approach is used combining expertise in orthopedic surgery, vascular surgery and plastic surgery.      

Vascular injuries in the urban battleground: experience at a metropolitan trauma center

The increasing frequency and severity of urban violence and vehicular injuries have brought with them a rise in the number of complex vascular injuries. To examine the cause, incidence, management, and outcome of this problem, we created a vascular trauma registry which includes all such cases treated at a Level I metropolitan trauma center over the past nine years. This constitutes a summary report of that registry. During the period 1979-1988, 411 patients (355 men, 56 women) with 478 vascular injuries were treated. There were 18 deaths (4%). Primary diagnosis was grouped by anatomic region: (1) head and neck vessels, 62 (15%); (2) thoracic, 39 (10%); (3) abdominal and pelvic, 63 (15%); (4) upper extremity, 161 (39%); and (5) lower extremity, 86 (21%). Surgery was required in 241 cases (60%). Operative techniques consisted of ligation or resection in 26 (12%) and direct repair in 212 (88%). Associated procedures included: (1) laparotomy (n = 83); (2) craniotomy (n = 4); (3) thoracotomy (n = 49); (4) orthopedic procedures (n = 118); and (5) peripheral neurological repair (n = 70). Mechanisms of injury were: (1) gunshot wounds (32%); (2) stab wounds (45%); (3) motor vehicle accidents (18%); (4) fall (3%); and (5) other mechanisms (2%). We conclude: (1) vascular injuries were found frequently in the severely injured patient; (2) multiple vascular repairs were required in a significant proportion of these patients; and (3) outcome is dependent more upon associated trauma than on the vascular injuries themselves.     

Vascular injury associated with extremity trauma: initial diagnosis and management

Vascular injury associated with extremity trauma occurs in <1% of patients with long bone fracture, although vascular injury may be seen in up to 16% of patients with knee dislocation. In the absence of obvious signs of vascular compromise, limb-threatening injuries are easily missed, with potentially devastating consequences. A thorough vascular assessment is essential; an arterial pressure index <0.90 is indicative of potential vascular compromise. Advances in CT and duplex ultrasonography are sensitive and specific in screening for vascular injury. Communication between the orthopaedic surgeon and the vascular or general trauma surgeon is essential in determining whether to address the vascular lesion or the orthopaedic injury first. Quality evidence regarding the optimal fixation method is scarce. Open vascular repair, such as direct repair with or without arteriorrhaphy, interposition replacement, and bypass graft with an autologous vein or polytetrafluoroethylene, remains the standard of care in managing vascular injury associated with extremity trauma. Although surgical technique affects outcome, results are primarily dependent on early detection of vascular injury followed by immediate treatment.     

Orthopedic trauma of limbs associated with vascular injuries

Objective： To evaluate the treatment for patients with major vascular injuries associated with traumatic orthopedic injuries. Methods： A total of 196 patients, aged from 4-67 years with the mean age of 29.88 years, had major vascular injuries associated with traumatic orthopedic injuries and were treated in our hospital in a period of 44 years. The most common mechanism of trauma was blunt trauma （67.3 % ）, open injuries accounted for 32.4 % and 54.5 % of the injuries were located in the lower extremities. The vascular injury frequently happened in the femoral artery （26. 7 % ） and popliteal artery （ 20. 3 % ）. The treatment principle consisted of aggressive resuscitation, Doppler imaging and stable bone internal fixation with subsequent vascular repair and debridement. The vascular repair for injuries included end-to-end anastomosis （80 cases, 39.6 % ）, interpositional vein graft （94, 46.5 % ）, vascular decompression through fracture distraction （ 18, 8.9% ）,arterial ligation （6, 3.0% ）, vein patch （2, 1. 0%）, bypass graft （ 2, 1.0% ）, venous repair including autogenous vein graft （9, 24. 3%） and ligation （28, 75.7% ） and prophylactical fasciotomy （15. 7. 4%）. Postoperative amputation was performed in 16 cases （16.3%）. Results： No intraoperative death was observed and all fractures united within 6 months. Limbs were salvaged in 180 patients （91. 8% ）. Among these patients, early complications were found in 19 patients （9. 7 % ） and late complications were observed in 8 patients （4.1% ）. Conclusions： A well-organized approach, based on a specific treatment principle, not only improves clinical outcome but also does good to excellent functional recovery for patients with severe orthopedic injuries and concomitant vascular lesion.     

Vascular trauma in civilian practice.

Vascular trauma is associated with major morbidity and mortality, but little is known about its incidence or nature in Britain. A retrospective study of 36 patients requiring operative intervention for vascular trauma under one vascular surgeon over a 6-year period was undertaken. Twenty-four patients suffered iatrogenic trauma (median age 61 years); including cardiological intervention (19), radiological intervention (2), varicose vein surgery (1), umbilical vein catherisation (1) and isolated hyperthermic limb perfusion (1). There were 23 arterial and three venous injuries. Twelve patients had accidental trauma (median age 23 years). Three of the ten patients with blunt trauma were referred for vascular assessment before orthopaedic intervention, two after an on-table angiogram and five only after an initial orthopaedic procedure (range of delay 6 h to 10 days). Injuries were arterial in nine, venous in two and combined in one. Angiography was obtained in six patients, and in two patients with multiple upper limb fractures identified the site of injury when clinical localisation was difficult. A variety of vascular techniques were used to treat the injuries. Two patients died postoperatively and one underwent major limb amputation. Thirty-two (89%) remain free of vascular sequelae after a median follow-up of 48 months (range 3-72 months). Vascular trauma is uncommon in the United Kingdom. To repair the injuries a limited repertoire of vascular surgery techniques is needed. Therefore, vascular surgical assessment should be sought at an early stage to prevent major limb loss.     

Optimal limb salvage in penetrating civilian vascular trauma

To evaluate current treatment of peripheral vascular trauma, we reviewed our recent experience with noniatrogenic penetrating vascular injuries of the extremities. Between 1979 and 1984, 139 patients sustained 204 vascular injuries inflicted by single gunshots (64%), stabbings (24%), and shotguns (12%). Eighty-four percent of patients underwent preoperative arteriography, which revealed occult arterial injury in 13 patients (9%). Compartmental hypertension necessitated fasciotomy in 19% of patients and was required more often after combined arterial and venous injuries (29%) than after isolated arterial injury (14%). Arterial continuity was restored by interposition grafting with reversed saphenous vein (62%), end-to-end anastomosis (19%), vein patch angioplasty (8%), or primary repair (4%). After arterial repair, completion angiography detected the need for revision in 8% of patients. Arterial ligation was performed in 7% of injuries and was only used in the treatment of tibial and distal profunda femoris injuries. Forty-five percent of patients sustained concomitant venous injury; 64% of all venous injuries and 90% of femoropopliteal venous injuries were repaired. No deaths occurred, and a single patient required amputation. We conclude that a protocol of preoperative arteriography, liberal. use of fasciotomy, frequent use of autologous interposition grafts, repair of major venous injuries, and routine use of completion arteriography can result in limb salvage rates that approach 100% after penetrating vascular trauma to the extremities.     

Popliteal artery trauma: a high risk injury

The clinical presentation and management of 28 popliteal artery injuries following penetrating and blunt trauma during a 6 year period is reviewed. Clinical and Doppler evaluation identified an arterial injury in 24 (85 per cent) patients. In eight (29 per cent) patients with arteriovenous fistulae or false aneurysms, pedal pulses were palpable during initial assessment. Three (10.7 per cent) patients had limb amputation attributable to delayed vascular repair, crush injury and sepsis. End-to-end arterial repair following blunt trauma resulted in early failure with thrombosis in two patients. Autogenous vein grafting was used in 12 patients and is advocated in all blunt popliteal arterial injuries. Routine repair of associated venous injuries and liberal criteria for early fasciotomy were used. Exoskeletal fixation or skeletal traction for compound and comminuted fractures is recommended for simplicity of application and wound management. The significant functional orthopaedic disability following blunt arterial trauma at the knee is emphasized.     

Treatment of vascular injuries associated with limb fractures

INTRODUCTION: The goal of therapy in all patients with combined orthopaedic and vascular injuries of the extremities is salvage of a functional limb. In this study, we have evaluated our experience with a subset of patients who had a combination of vascular injury and limb fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 192 patients with vascular injuries of the lower and upper limbs associated with bone fractures were reviewed. Of these, 168 were males and 24 were females; the mean age was 26 years. RESULTS: The mechanism of injury was a penetrating wound in 97 (51%) patients and blunt trauma in 95 (49%) patients. Injured vessels included 6 subclavian/axillary, 39 brachial, 14 radial/ulnar, 11 radial, 8 ulnar, 36 femoral, 43 popliteal, 35 tibial arteries. Saphenous vein graft was the most common conduit of choice in arterial repair (55%). Amputations were needed for 20 patients. The limb salvage rate was 88%. Three patients died. CONCLUSIONS: This study established that delay in surgery, blunt trauma and extensive soft tissue defect in combined orthopaedic and vascular injuries are associated with increased risk of amputation.     

Inferior vena cava injuries--a continuing challenge

The mortality from abdominal vena cava trauma remains in excess of 33% despite advances in prehospital and intraoperative care. During the 7-year period ending December 1981, 58 patients with vena cava injuries were treated at our institution. Thirty-nine (67%) were due to gunshot wounds, nine to stab injuries, and ten to blunt trauma. Overall mortality was 38%. Predictors of poor survival were: 1) presence of shock upon hospital arrival; 2) multiple abdominal vascular injuries; and 3) injuries in the retrohepatic segment. Only two (17%) of 12 patients survived retrohepatic wounds despite various shunting techniques. Of the remaining 12 deaths, 11 (92%) had associated major vascular trauma that included four portal system, three aortic, and three iliac artery injuries. This contrasts to a 96% survival rate for the 28 patients without associated abdominal vascular injuries. Our experience underscores the importance of rapid resuscitation, early operation, and searching for associated vascular injuries before a time-consuming repair of the vena cava is undertaken. Improving the survival of patients with blunt retrohepatic cava and hepatic vein trauma remains a dilemma.     

Vascular injury about the knee. Improved outcome

The records of 41 patients with 43 vascular injuries about the knee (34 popliteal artery, five tibial-peroneal trunk, one proximal anterior tibial artery, and three isolated popliteal veins) were analyzed. The etiology of the injuries were gunshot wounds (22), blunt trauma (11), shotgun wounds (4), and stab wounds (4). Associated injuries included fractures (67%), popliteal vein (54%), and nerves (32%). Arterial repairs consisted of primary repair (19), lateral repair (1), saphenous vein grafts (13), and saphenous vein patching (1). Five patients received polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts. Fasciotomy was performed in 27 limbs. The associated venous injuries (21) and isolated venous injuries (3) were managed with ligation (14), primary repair (9), and vein patch (1). The amputation rate was 11 per cent for popliteal artery injuries (4/34). No other amputations were required. All four amputations were associated with massive limb injury (3) or diagnostic delay (1). One patient died during hemodialysis for renal failure resulting from prolonged shock and myoglobinuria. Successful management correlates best with prompt repair of both popliteal arterial and venous injuries and early fasciotomy. Vein repair (vs ligation) is associated with better long-term results.     

严重骨盆骨折合并毗邻脏器损伤的救治

目的探讨严重骨盆骨折合并毗邻脏器损伤的急诊处理方法。方法对14年中收治的79例严重骨盆骨折合并毗邻脏器损伤患者的资料做回顾性分析。结果骨盆大出血行髂内动脉结扎术33例、栓塞术8例;膀胱造口和后期尿道重建35例、尿道会师术7例;腹膜外直肠伤做结肠造口并骶前引流13例、一期修补4例;腹膜内结直肠伤一期手术19例、结肠造口3例。死亡率9％(7／79),主要死于休克和合并伤。共发生并发症7例：直肠膀胱瘘4例、右髂总动脉血栓形成1例、胸伤后急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)1例、截瘫1例,除截瘫均治愈。结论迅速准确的诊断治疗是成功的关键。髂内动脉断血术配合骨盆外固定支架的使用、膀胱造口和乙状结肠近端造口,是危重患者急诊治疗时常采用的有效方法。     

Conservative management of duodenal trauma: a multicenter perspective

The experience of eight trauma centers with duodenal injuries was analyzed to identify trends in operative management, sources of duodenal-related morbidity, and causes of mortality. During the 5-year period ending December 1988, 164 duodenal injuries were identified. Patient ages ranged from 5 to 78 years. There were 38 Class I, 70 Class II, 48 Class III, four Class IV, and four Class V injuries. Injury mechanism was penetrating in 102 (62%) patients and blunt in 62. Primary repair of the duodenal injury was performed in 117 (71%) patients, including 27 patients also managed with pyloric exclusion and 12 with tube duodenostomy. Duodenal resection with primary anastomosis was used in six (4%) patients and pancreatoduodenectomy was necessary in five (3%). There were 30 (18%) deaths. The cause of death was uncontrolled hemorrhage from severe hepatic or vascular injuries in 22 (73%) patients. In only two (1%) patients could death be attributed to the duodenal injury; each as the result of duodenal repair dehiscence and subsequent sepsis. Duodenal-related morbidity was documented in 29 (18%) patients, including 22 patients with intra-abdominal abscess, six with duodenal fistula, and five with frank duodenal dehiscence. In summary, this analysis demonstrated: 1) the great majority of duodenal injuries can be managed by simple repair; 2) tube duodenostomy is not a mandatory component of operative treatment; 3) pyloric exclusion is a useful adjunct for more complex injuries; 4) pancreatoduodenectomy is rarely necessary for civilian duodenal trauma; 5) morbidity following duodenal trauma is more dependent on associated intra-abdominal injuries than the extent of duodenal trauma; and 6) mortality following duodenal injuries is primarily related to associated vascular and hepatic trauma.     

Blunt colonic injury--a multicenter review.

During the past decade there has been a shift in the management of injuries of the colon to primary repair without a protective diverting colostomy. Unfortunately, reports concerning this practice contain relatively few patients with blunt trauma and it is unclear whether the principles established for penetrating injury should be applied in the setting of blunt colon injury. A retrospective review of 54,361 major blunt trauma patients admitted to nine regional trauma centers from January 1, 1986, through December 31, 1990, was conducted. Statistical analysis of the data collected regarding 286 (0.5%) of these patients who suffered colonic injury revealed: (1) injury to the colon is found in more than 10% of patients undergoing laparotomy following blunt trauma; (2) available diagnostic modalities are unreliable in detecting isolated colonic pathology; (3) primary repair of full-thickness injuries or resection and anastomosis may be safely performed without diversion; (4) gross fecal contamination is the strongest contraindication to primary repair. Further, delay of surgery, shock, and the timing of antibiotic administration were not associated with significantly increased morbidity.     

Management of severe pelvic fracture associated with injuries of adjacent viscera

everepelvicfractureassociatedwithinjuriesofadjacentviscerahasahighmortality .Thefirst”goldenhour”aftertraumashouldbegrasped ,sincethemanagementinthishourcandeterminegreatlywhetherthecritically injuredvictimcouldsurvive .Inthispaper ,theexperienceintheemergencymanagementofsuch patientsisreviewedinordertoimprovethetherapeuticoutcome .METHODSSeventyninepatientswithseverepelvicfractureassociatedwithinjuriesofadjacentvisceratreatedinourDepartmentfromJanuary 1990toDecember 2 0 0 3werereviewedr…     

Vascular trauma of the lower limbs

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the results of treatment of vascular trauma of the lower extremities and those factors associated with limb loss. Design: a retrospective evaluation of a series with lower extremities vascular trauma. Setting: University Hospital. METHODS: Thirty-one patients accounting for 45 vascular lesions of the lower extremities (27 arterial and 18 venous injuries), over a 15 years period ending December 1998. Age, sex, modality of the trauma, site of the lesion and associated skeletal injuries, diagnostic procedures, ischemic time, arterial and venous repair performed were analyzed. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was 7.4%. For arterial injuries, limb salvage was obtained in 22 patients (81.5%). Five amputations (18.5%), 1 primary and 4 secondary have been performed. Amputation rate was 26.7% for popliteal lesions versus 8.3% for other locations, 40% when a skeletal lesion was associated versus 5.9% for those without such injuries, 37.5% for reverse saphenous vein interpositions versus 5.6% for arterial repair without interposition. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the factors influencing limb loss in vascular trauma of the lower extremities are popliteal location, the association with skeletal injuries, the need of saphenous vein interposition for arterial repair.     

Intra-abdominal complications after surgical repair of small bowel injuries: an international review

BACKGROUND: The ideal method of repairing serious small bowel injuries remains unknown. Prior reports suggest a higher rate of enteric anastomotic-related complications (EACs) with stapled posttraumatic bowel anastomosis but did not specifically focus on the small bowel or clarify fully the actual anastomotic construction. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients requiring surgical repair of small bowel perforations at a Level I urban American center (Detroit Receiving Hospital [DRH]) and a Canadian provincial trauma center (Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Center [VHHSC]). All patients requiring a primary repair and/or resection were included. Anastomoses were hand-sewn, stapled, or combined stapling and sewing with mucosal inversion. Leaks, anastomotic fistulae, and intra-abdominal abscesses were considered specific EACs. A sample size of 53 per group was obtained to detect a 17% difference at alpha = 0.05 (one-sided) and beta = 0.2. RESULTS: Full-thickness small bowel injuries were repaired in 232 patients (DRH, 165; VHHSC, 67). Injuries were penetrating at DRH (91.5%) and blunt at VHHSC (65.7%). Anastomotic repairs in 127 patients (158 anastomotic repairs [DRH, 113; VHHSC, 55]) were 64 (40.5%) stapled, 38 (24.1%) hand-sewn, and 56 (35.4%) combined. Also, 105 patients had 349 primary closures of an injury. Overall, there were 24 EACs. After anastomosis, there were 11 intra-abdominal abscesses: 6 after stapling, 3 after being sewn, and 2 after a combined construction. There were four small bowel anastomotic fistulae: three after stapled-only anastomosis and one after hand-sewing. After enteroenterostomy, the EAC rate was 10.2% per patient, or 8.4% per anastomosis. After primary repairs, one patient had an anastomotic fistula, which closed spontaneously, and 11 had intra-abdominal abscesses, yielding an EAC rate of 10.6% per patient or 3.4% per repair. A primary repair was significantly less likely to be associated with an EAC than any anastomosis (p = 0.035). No method of anastomosis was statistically safer in relation to EACs, whether analyzed by patient, by anastomosis, or by considering primarily either the use of a linear stapler or the principle of inverting the mucosal approximation. Only damage control procedures and associated pancreaticoduodenal injuries were identified as statistically significant predictors using multiple logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Anastomotic complications after enteroenterostomy or primary repair for trauma are uncommon regardless of the technique, but surgeons must be especially cautious during or after damage control. Primary repairs are desirable, but when anastomosis is unavoidable, the method of repair should reflect that with which the surgeon is the most comfortable.     

结直肠损伤的手术治疗：附125例报告

目的:探讨结直肠损伤的手术治疗和围手术期处理。 方法:回顾性分析19年间收治的125例结直肠损伤患者的临床资料。结果:结肠和腹膜内直肠破裂69例中，初期缝合或切除吻合56例（81.16 %），行造口术11例，“损伤控制外科”术式2例。腹膜外直肠破裂18例中，14例行乙状结肠近端造口并骶前引流，4例一期修补未造口;其余38例非全层损伤患者，均做简单修补。全组死亡8例（6.40 %），6例术中、1例术后死于失血性休克，1例术后5 d死于胸腔感染。术后并发症包括局部感染6例、粘连性肠梗阻1例，均治愈。 结论:多数结肠和腹膜内直肠损伤可一期手术，应配合围手术期正确使用抗生素尤其甲硝唑。腹膜外直肠伤应分期手术，为阻断远端污染，应行乙状结肠近端造口而不选择襻式造口。     

Humeral shaft fracture with brachial artery injury

The management of ten patients with fracture of the humeral diaphysis and concomitant injury to the brachial artery was analyzed retrospectively for examination of the factors contributing to preservation of limb viability and function. Of ten treated fractures, eight were rigidly stabilized with either a plate or an external fixation device. Seven of the vascular injuries required an interpositional graft. Three arteries were repaired with an end-to-end anastomosis. Two of these repairs failed in patients whose fractures were not rigidly stabilized, and one of these patients required amputation. Fasciotomy was performed in five cases. Seven patients retained normal or functional extremities despite ligation of the brachial artery in two individuals. Preoperative arteriography was of equivocal value, and it doubled the patient's transit time from the emergency room to surgery. The use of a temporary intraluminal vascular shunt to perfuse the limb at surgery and the semi-invasive rigid stability afforded by contemporary external fixators are important advances in the management of these complex injuries. In civilian practice, the prioritized guidelines the authors suggest for care of combined major skeletal and vascular trauma to the arm are: resuscitation of the patient; arteriogram, which is nonessential in open injuries but helpful in closed trauma; intraoperative perfusion of the limb with a temporary shunt; rigid bony stabilization; wound debridement; vascular repair with an autogenous vein graft; neurorrhaphy; and assessment of the need for fasciotomy.     

Outcomes of patients with orthopaedic trauma admitted to level 1 trauma centres

BACKGROUND: Although orthopaedic trauma results in significant disability and substantial financial cost, there is a paucity of large cohort studies that collectively describe the functional outcomes of a variety of these injuries. The current study aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients admitted with a range of orthopaedic injuries to adult Level 1 trauma centres. METHODS: Patients were recruited from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR), which included all patients with orthopaedic trauma admitted to the two adult Level 1 trauma centres in Victoria (Australia). Patients were categorised into three groups; isolated orthopaedic injuries, multiple orthopaedic injuries and orthopaedic and other injuries. Demographic and injury data were collected from the medical record and hospital/trauma databases, and functional outcome instruments were given at 6 months post-injury. RESULTS: Of the 1303 patients recruited for VOTOR over a 12-month period, 1181 patients were eligible for the study and a response rate of 75.6% was obtained at 6 months post-injury. Patients reported ongoing pain (moderate-severe: 37.2%), disability (79.5%) and inability to return to work (35.2%). Poorer outcomes were evident in patients with orthopaedic and other injuries than those with single or multiple orthopaedic injuries alone. CONCLUSION: A large percentage of patients have ongoing pain and disability and a reduced capacity to return to work 6 months after orthopaedic trauma. Further research into the long-term outcomes of patients with orthopaedic injuries is required to identify patient subgroups and specific injuries and procedures that result in high morbidity.     

Rural vascular trauma: A twenty-year review

A 20-year review documented 248 vascular injuries in 210 patients from principally rural areas. The average time between injury and treatment from 1970 to 1983 was 6 hours. Between 1983 to 1990, when 46% of patients were transported by helicopter, the average delay was 4 hours. Blunt trauma (41%, with 29% motor vehicle accidents and 12% farm/industrial accidents) caused the most severe injuries and accounted for most amputations (89%) and deaths (80%). All of the blunt trauma patients had associated injuries. Penetrating injuries occurred in 59% of the patients and accounted for 11 % of the amputations and 20% of the deaths. Extremity vessels were injured 73% of the time (upper extremity, 47%; lower extremity, 26%). Eightyseven percent of the vessels injured were arteries and 13% were major venous injuries. Preoperative arteriograms were obtained in 30% of our patients. Vascular injury was determined in the others at the time of operative exploration. Vascular repair included direct anastomosis or lateral suture repair (51%), autogenous vein graft (16%), synthetic graft (6%), and ligation (19%). Primary amputation and thrombectomy were other (8%) initial treatments. In the past 10 years concomitant major peripheral venous injuries were repaired in six patients (one amputation) and ligated in one patient (no amputation). The mortality rates (4.8% total) for patients with blunt and penetrating trauma were 9.3% and 1.6%, respectively. Survival rates have not improved since the implementation of a helicopter transport system in 1983, but the amputation rate declined from 18% to 7%.