Thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

Thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery was conducted in 28 consecutive patients (bilateral 21, unilateral 7). The bilateral procedure was conducted simultaneously in 16 and as a planned staged approach in 5, using stapler resection with Nd: YAG laser ablation. Perfusion and ventilation scintigraphy were used to evaluate status before and after surgery. One operative death (3.6%) due to pneumonia occurred after a simultaneous bilateral procedure. Three to 6 months after surgery, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV_1.0) had improved an average of 44% after the bilateral procedure and 17% after unilateral. Improved ventilation and perfusion distribution in the lower lung field correlated significantly with improved dyspnea scale (p < 0.01). Mean transit time was shortened significantly in each lung field (p < 0.01). Improved mean transit time correlated significantly with improved FEV_1.0 and maximum oxygen consumption ( $\dot Vo_2 \max$ ) (p < 0.05). In conclusion, we found that bilateral thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery produces short-term functional outcomes superior to those of the unilateral procedure, and should be considered the procedure of choice for most patients. Ventilation and perfusion scintigraphy are useful both in determining target areas for resection and in evaluating lung volume reduction surgery effects.     

Results of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

LVRS provides an exciting opportunity for palliation of symptoms and improvement in quality of life for patients who have severe end-stage emphysema. Because no medical therapy has been able to improve pulmonary function or reverse the inexorable decline of breathless patients who have emphysema, this opportunity to improve lung function and quality of life is one of the most innovative additions to thoracic surgery since the first successful lung transplant procedure 20 years ago. Although initial short-term, case-controlled surgeries were criticized because of incomplete and short follow-up care, substantial long-term data now exist to support the use of LVRS for select patients who have severe emphysema. Patients who have upper lobe predominant disease or low exercise capacity are more likely to have a benefit in exercise capacity and quality of life after LVRS. Selected patients who have upper lobe emphysema and poor exercise capacity are also more likely to have improved survival after LVRS. The individual contributions by the large number of investigators pioneering LVRS development, along with the collective contributions of the NETT investigators, have propelled the knowledge surrounding LVRS far beyond that of any similar new technology or procedure in its adolescence.     

Radiologic assessment of emphysema for lung volume reduction surgery

Radiologic imaging is vital to determining whether lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is a potential therapeutic option for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The importance of imaging in patient selection for LVRS has been emphasized by numerous studies relating preoperative imaging features to postoperative outcomes. This article reviews the radiologic features assessed in the LVRS evaluation, summarizes the relationships between preoperative radiologic features and postoperative outcomes, and addresses the limitations of imaging in guiding patient selection.     

肺减容术治疗重度肺气肿临床探讨

目的 研究肺减容术对重度肺气肿的手术适应证和临床疗效。方法 选择２０例重度肺气肿患者,经胸骨正中劈开切口或电视辅助胸腔镜途径,用直线切割缝合器或Ｅｎｄｏ ＧＩＡ,切除因过度膨胀而破坏的、无功能肺组织。每侧肺切除其容量的２０％￣３０％。结果术后呼吸困难明显减轻或消失;９５％患者呼吸困难指数从４￣５级转变为１￣２级。肺功能１秒时间肺活量（ＦＥＶ１）增加４１．４％,残气量（ＲＶ）和肺总量（ＴＬＣ）分别     

Thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. Evaluation using ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy.

Thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery was conducted in 28 consecutive patients (bilateral 21, unilateral 7). The bilateral procedure was conducted simultaneously in 16 and as a planned staged approach in 5, using stapler resection with Nd:YAG laser ablation. Perfusion and ventilation scintigraphy were used to evaluate status before and after surgery. One operative death (3.6%) due to pneumonia occurred after a simultaneous bilateral procedure. Three to 6 months after surgery, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1.0) had improved an average of 44% after the bilateral procedure and 17% after unilateral. Improved ventilation and perfusion distribution in the lower lung field correlated significantly with improved dyspnea scale (p < 0.01). Mean transit time was shortened significantly in each lung field (p < 0.01). Improved mean transit time correlated significantly with improved FEV1.0 and maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) (p < 0.05). In conclusion, we found that bilateral thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery produces short-term functional outcomes superior to those of the unilateral procedure, and should be considered the procedure of choice for most patients. Ventilation and perfusion scintigraphy are useful both in determining target areas for resection and in evaluating lung volume reduction surgery effects.     

Survival after unilateral versus bilateral lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral staple lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) immediately improves pulmonary function and dyspnea symptoms in patients with advanced heterogeneous emphysema to a greater degree than do unilateral procedures. However, the long-term outcome after these surgical procedures needs to be critically evaluated. We compare 2-year survival of patients who underwent unilateral versus bilateral video-assisted LVRS in a large cohort treated by a single surgical group. METHODS: The cases of all 260 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic stapled LVRS from April 1994 to March 1996 were analyzed to compare results after unilateral versus bilateral procedures. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods; Cox proportional hazard methods were used to adjust for patient heterogeneity and baseline differences between groups. RESULTS: Overall survival at 2 years was 86.4% (95% CI 80. 9%-91.8%) after bilateral LVRS versus 72.6% (95% CI 64.2%-81.2%) after unilateral LVRS (P =.001 for overall survival comparison). Improved survival after bilateral LVRS was seen among high- and low-risk subgroups as well. Average follow-up time was 28.5 months (range, 6 days to 46.6 months) for the bilateral LVRS group and 29.3 months (range, 6 days to 45.0 months) for the unilateral LVRS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral thoracoscopic LVRS procedures for the treatment of emphysema reveals that bilateral LVRS by video-assisted thoracoscopy resulted in better overall survival at 2-year follow-up than did unilateral LVRS. This survival study, together with other studies demonstrating improved lung function after bilateral LVRS, suggests that bilateral surgery appears to be the procedure of choice for patients undergoing LVRS for most eligible patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema.     

肺气肿胸腔镜减容术

目的探讨肺气肿的外科处理方法。方法对５例重度肺气肿的患者进行胸腔镜双肺减容术的外科治疗。患者均为男性,平均年龄６４．３岁。３例行部分肺切除术,１例行肺折叠术,１例行部分肺切除术加折叠术。术中计算机气道内监测ＣＯ２变化和顺应性改变,发现气道阻力明显下降和肺顺应性增高,术后无需呼吸机维持通气。结果经３、６和１０个月随防,患者肺功能均有逐步好转。ＦＥＶ１从０．３８～０．５３恢复至０．８３～１．４,ＦＶＣ从１．１５～２．３９回复至２．２２～３．０。胸片提示膈肌部分弧度从平面恢复弧形。活动能力从平卧和只行走１０米到术后可以步行至２００米以上。结论表明严重肺气肿的患者经肺容积减少术后各方面指标改善,活动能力好转,恢复生活自理     

Postoperative pain management following bilateral lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema

This study was conducted to audit the clinical management of a continuous local anaesthetic infusion delivered by a fluoroscopically placed thoracic epidural catheter in conjunction with supplemental intravenous opioid patient controlled analgesia for postoperative pain control following bilateral lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema. This retrospective case series involved a random sample of 43 patients from a possible 65 patients. The mean dose of epidural bupivacaine 0.15% was 6.7 ml/h (SD 1.5), while the mean daily dose of morphine or hydromorphone was 22.5 mg/day (SD 17.9) and 4.3 mg/day (SD 3.1), respectively. Inadequate analgesia was reported by 19 (44%) patients during the first two postoperative days, but was successfully treated by individual titration of these medications. The incidence of atrial fibrillation (n = 6), premature epidural catheter dislodgement (n=6) or respiratory failure (n=3) appeared to be greater among patients who had inadequate analgesia at some stage. One patient developed excessive sedation; otherwise, there were no major complications. The use of an epidural bupivacaine infusion in conjunction with intravenous opioid patient controlled analgesia proved to be a safe and effective pain medication regimen when accompanied by individual titration of these agents in response to acute exacerbations of postoperative pain.     

Thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery for pulmonary emphysema patients with severe hypercapnia

OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether hypercapnia patients with an extremely high level of PaCO2 > or = 60 mmHg were suitable candidates for lung volume reduction in the treatment of severe pulmonary emphysema. METHODS: Of 65 patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery between May 1993 and August 1997, 6 (9.23%) who had a preoperative rest room air blood gas level of PaCO2 > or = 60 mmHg were selected for study. All patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Of the 6 with severe hypercapnia, 5 underwent the unilateral procedure and 1 the bilateral procedure. RESULTS: All severe hypercapnia patients showed significant clinical improvement. When assessed at 3 to 6 months after lung volume reduction surgery, significant improvements were seen in mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (preop: 0.44 +/- 0.04 L; postop: 0.74 +/- 0.20 L; p < 0.01), for a magnitude improvement of 69.8%, and in trapped gas volume (preop: 3.28 +/- 1.11 L; postop: 1.61 +/- 1.02 L; p < 0.05). Arterial blood gas analysis showed significant improvement in PaO2 from 51.1 +/- 6.68 mmHg to 69.8 +/- 7.87 mmHg (p < 0.001) with a decrease in PaCO2 from 70.4 +/- 9.41 mmHg to 46.9 +/- 3.44 mmHg (p < 0.01). Postoperative follow-up averaged 55 months (43-69 months). All but 1 patient remain alive and well. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe pulmonary emphysema accompanied by hypercapnia can gain relief and a better quality of life through volume reduction surgery and should not be excluded from surgical treatment simply based on this condition. Selection should involve a comprehensive view of the patient's condition that includes criteria such as the results of radiographic diagnosis and detailed pulmonary function tests.     

Outcome after unilateral lung volume reduction surgery in patients with severe emphysema.

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has emerged as a palliative treatment option in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema. However, it is not known if a sustained functional improvement can be obtained using an unilateral approach. METHODS: We hypothesized that a palliative effect can also be obtained by unilateral LVRS and prospectively assessed lung function, walking distance, and dyspnea before and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after unilateral LVRS. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were operated by the use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with a mean follow-up of 16.5 months (range 3-36 months). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was significantly improved up to 3 months (1007+/-432 compared to 1184+/-499 ml, P<0.001), residual volume up to 24 months (4154+/-1126 compared to 3390+/-914 ml, P<0.01), dyspnea up to 12 months (modified Borg dyspnea scale 6.6+/-1.8 compared to 3.9+/-1.8, P=0.01) and walking distance up to 24 months (343+/-107 compared to 467+/-77 m, P<0.05) after unilateral LVRS compared to preoperative values. Overall, 25 of 28 patients reported a subjective benefit after unilateral LVRS. There was no 30-day mortality. Only two patients required surgery on the contralateral side after 4.5 and 6 months, respectively, both suffering from alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral LVRS by the use of VATS results in a sustained beneficial effect, improving walking distance and dyspnea for up to 24 months in patients with severe emphysema. The preservation of the contralateral side for future intervention if required renders unilateral LVRS an attractive concept in this difficult palliative situation.     

Anaesthetic management of patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery for treatment of severe emphysema.

Lung volume reduction surgery can improve lung function in patients with emphysema. We report our anaesthetic experience, problems and the physiological data of eight patients. Our aims were prevention of air trapping and air leaks, good analgesia and early recovery and mobilization. We were able to achieve these aims using pressure limited ventilation, lumbar epidural diamorphine, propofol infusions and intensive physiotherapy. Hypoxia during one-lung ventilation was the main intraoperative problem. Air leaks, infection and pulmonary hypertension were the main postoperative problems.     

电视胸腔镜辅助小切口行双侧肺减容术治疗重度肺气肿

目的:评价电视胸腔镜辅助小切口行双侧肺减容术治疗重度肺气肿的疗效,并总结围术期的处理经验。方法:回顾分析2006年以来为18例重度肺气肿患者实施肺减容术的临床资料,对比分析手术前后肺功能指标和动脉血氧分压的变化。结果:本组无手术死亡病例,2例合并急性呼吸衰竭。术后随访半年,平均第1秒用力呼气量增加39.2%,用力肺活量增加20.1%,残气量下降26.5%,肺总量下降23.1%,动脉血氧分压平均上升15.1%,与术前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:电视胸腔镜辅助小切口行双侧肺减容术是经济有效的治疗方法,能明显改善重度肺气肿患者的临床症状和生理状况,增加活动能力。     

电视胸腔镜下肺减容术治疗重度肺气肿6例

目的 评价电视胸腔镜下肺减容术治疗重度肺气肿的疗效。方法 对6例重度肺气肿进行胸腔镜肺减容术,其中同期双侧2例,单侧4例。切除一侧肺容积约25％-30％。结果 无手术死亡,随访3-17个月,FEV1和PaO2增加24.6％和8.3％。RV、TLC和气道阻力分别下降24．6％、20．3％、47．1％。结论 严重肺气肿患经肺减容术后呼吸困难缓解,生活质量改善。     

肺减容手术治疗重度肺气肿的临床研究

目的评价肺减容手术对重度肺气肿患者的疗效。方法36例重度肺气肿患者行肺减容手术,双侧8例,单侧28例。术前、术后3、6个月分别测量动脉血气(PaO2,PaCO2)、肺功能(FEV1、RV、TLC)、6分钟运动试验(6-MWD),并对其结果进行比较分析。结果本组无手术死亡,均痊愈出院;术后动脉血氧分压比术前明显提高(P<0.05),二氧化碳分压比术前明显降低(P<0.05);术后3、6个月的FEV1、6-MWD较术前有明显提高(P<0.05),RV、TLC较术前有明显降低(P<0.05);呼吸困难指数再分级,26例术前Ⅲ级中10例转为Ⅰ级,16例转为Ⅱ级;10例Ⅳ级中3例转为Ⅰ级,5例转为Ⅱ级,2例转为Ⅲ级。结论重度肺气肿患者选择性手术,能改善患者肺功能,提高生活质量。     

Early results of endoscopic lung volume reduction for emphysema

BACKGROUND: We determined the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of bronchoscopic placement of a one-way endobronchial valve in selected bronchopulmonary segments as an alternative to surgical lung volume reduction. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with incapacitating emphysema who underwent this procedure were studied. All patients had placement of the endobronchial valves into the most emphysematous lung segments. We recorded any major complications or deaths attributed to the procedure and analyzed (1) improvements in the spirometric and functional parameters and quality of life and (2) the radiologic changes compared with the baseline data at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients had complete follow-up data. There was no mortality in the group studied. The forced expiratory volume at 1 second, forced expiratory volume at 1 second (percentage of predicted), forced vital capacity, and forced vital capacity (percentage of predicted) all improved significantly at 90 days (0.73 +/- 0.26 L vs 0.92 +/- 0.34 L [P =.009]; 33.3% +/- 11.9% vs 42.2% +/- 15.0% [P =.006]; 1.94 +/- 0.62 L vs 2.25 +/- 0.61 L [P =.015]; and 63.3% +/- 17.6% vs 73.9% +/- 17.1% [P =.012], respectively). The 6-minute walking distance improved at 30 and 90 days (251.6 +/- 100.2 m vs 306.3 +/- 112.3 m and 322.3 +/- 129.7 m; P =.012 and P =.003). The results of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and the St George Respiratory Questionnaire showed significant improvements at 90 days. The Medical Research Council dyspnea grade also improved significantly at 30 and at 90 days (P =.006 and P =.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Endobronchial valve placement is a safe procedure, with significant short-term improvements in functional status, quality of life, and relief of dyspnea in selected patients with emphysema. A larger study with long-term follow-up is therefore warranted.     

Anaesthesia for lung volume reduction surgery

Lung volume reduction surgery is a surgical treatment for severe emphysema that is increasing in popularity. The aim is to reverse the hyperexpansion of the lungs that leads to expiratory airflow limitation, compromises the diaphragm and chest wall mechanics, and tamponades the right ventricle. Optimal patient selection has not yet been established, but it has become clear that those patients with the most severe disease have an unacceptably high surgical mortality. The anaesthetic management of patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery requires a good understanding of both the pathophysiology of the disease and the surgical procedure. It is important for the anaesthetist and the surgeon to work closely, supported by a large multidisciplinary team. Excellent analgesia is essential to a successful outcome; whether this is best provided by thoracic epidural is as yet unclear.     

Anaesthesia for lung volume reduction surgery

To date, only a few published studies have been concerned with the anaesthesiological aspects of lung volume reduction surgery. This review summarizes the different anaesthetic concepts and offers a general strategy to meet specific requirements. Limitation of peak inspiratory pressure, tolerance of hypercapnia and avoidance of hypoxia during one-lung ventilation, and the immediate postoperative tracheal extubation of these patients, are considered to be crucial. However, many aspects of the procedure and of anaesthesiological management remain to be elucidated.     

Anesthesia for lung volume reduction surgery

Background: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has become a novel palliative procedure for a subgroup of patients with advanced non-bullous emphysema. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with severe emphysema were evaluated: ten patients were considered for lung transplantation and only 24 underwent LVRS. In all patients an epidural catheter was inserted between the T5-T9 space. During one lung ventilation (OLV), ventilatory setting was adjusted to avoid air trapping and/or dynamic hyperinflation and high frequency jet ventilation was used when PaO2/ FiO2 was lower than 60 mmHg in 5 patients. Permissive hypercapnia (PaCO2=53 mmHg) was allowed to avoid hyperinflation and reach hemodynamic stability. RESULTS: During OLV PaO2/FiO2 was 148+/-80 mmHg, PaCO2 53+/-11 mmHg, mPA 27+/-2 mmHg and Qsp/Qt was 38+/-6%. Although the high risk patients, there were no complications due to hypercapnia during surgery. Twenty-three patients were extubated successfully at the end of the surgery (PaO2/FiO2 179+/-34 mmHg and PaCO2 59+/-11 mmHg) and only one patient was not extubated because of air leakage and died for postoperative respiratory failure after 20 days. Another patient died because of sepsis after 15 days. Numeric Ordinal Verbal Scale (by Keele modified) was used for postoperative pain degree at 0, 12th and 24th hours. No patients had pain>2. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, a careful anesthesia technique with an accurate intraop monitoring associated with thoracic epidural analgesia even in Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery is suggested in LVRS patients; 12 months postoperative data confirm the validity of the procedure (FEV1 24 AE 36%, FVC 53 AE 70%, RV 265 AE 199% and 6MWT 213 AE 330 m).