Long-Term Experience with a Preshaped Left Ventricular Pacing Lead

OLLITRAULT, J., et al. : Long-Term Experience with a Preshaped Left Ventricular Pacing Lead. This study describes a long-term experience with a new LV pacing lead. The study population consisted of 62 patients (85% men,   71 ± 10   years old) with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy, in NYHA Class III or IV despite optimal drug therapy, and a QRS duration >150 ms. Patients in sinus rhythm were implanted with a triple chamber pacemaker to maintain atrioventricular synchrony. A dual chamber pacemaker was implanted in patients in atrial fibrillation for biventricular pacing only. A clinical evaluation and interrogation of the resynchronization pacemaker were performed at implant, at 1 week (W1), one (M1), four (M4), and seven (M7) months after implantation. A longer follow-up (2 years) is available for patients implanted at the authors institution. LV measurements were pacing threshold at 0.5-ms pulse duration and pacing impedance. R wave amplitude (mV) was measured at the time of implantation only. The system was successfully implanted in 86% of patients with the latest design of the lead. Mean R wave amplitude at implant was   15 ± 7 mV   and mean pacing impedance was   1054 ± 254 Ω   . Between implant   (n = 38)   and M7   (n = 15)   , pacing threshold rose from   0.73 ± 0.54   to   1.57 ± 0.60 V (P < 0.001)   . In conclusion, the situs lead was successfully implanted in a high percentage of patients. In addition, low pacing threshold and high impedance measured during follow-up are consistent with a low pacing current drain, ensuring a durable pulse generator longevity. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:185–188)     

Seven Years of Left Ventricular Pacing Due to Malposition of Pacing Electrode

The case report is presented of a patient in whom an uncomplicated left ventricular transvenous pacing produced right bundle branch block (RBBB). A diagnostic echocardiography, confirmed by cine cardiovascular computed tomography, showed that there was no rupture of the right ventricle and diagnosed a left ventricular pacing, due to malposition of the pacing electrode. The patient was treated with aspirin and dipyridamole during the last 6 years of follow-up, without any complications, including 1 year of pacing, prior to admission.     

Inadvertent Left Ventricular Pacing through the Pericardium

Inadvertent placement of a pacemaker lead in the left ventricle (LV) is a rare complication of pacing. We describe a case of inadvertent LV pacing where the ventricular lead traversed the mediastinum and accessed the heart through the posterior wall of the left atrium. Both transesophageal echo and venography were useful in understanding the course of the misplaced lead, which was removed percutaneously without complication.     

Quad‐Site Pacing Using a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Pacing Lead

Pacing the left ventricle (LV) from multiple sites simultaneously may result in a better response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to assess whether multisite pacing using a quadripolar LV lead improves acute hemodynamic response (AHR) to CRT. We paced four ventricular sites simultaneously using two vectors of a Quartet lead, a right ventricular apical lead, and an additional LV lead temporarily placed in an anterior branch of the coronary sinus. Multisite pacing using the Quartet lead alone did not improve the AHR but “quad‐site” pacing using an additional temporary LV lead did increase dP/dt_max. (PACE 2013; 36:e48–e50)     

Balloon‐Facilitated Delivery of a Left Ventricular Pacing Lead

While modern implant tools have contributed greatly to the success of cardiac resynchronization therapy, technical challenges remain. A common problem is the inability to advance left ventricular pacing leads into branch veins that are tortuous or arise at steep angles. In these cases, advancement of the lead causes it to buckle and prolapse into the coronary sinus or great cardiac vein. Lead prolapsed can be avoided by employing a balloon to temporarily obstruct the coronary sinus or great cardiac vein just upstream from the branch vein. The balloon redirects the force of advancement laterally into the branch vein, facilitating delivery. (PACE 2013; 36:e31–e34)     

Abolition of Diaphragmatic Pacing by Nonsurgical Retraction of a Left Ventricular Lead

This report describes the nonsurgical elimination of intractable diaphragmatic stimulation by partial withdrawal of a left ventricular (LV) pacing lead (in the coronary venous system) with resultant preservation of LV pacing. The procedure entailed the use of a deflectable catheter in the right atrium for ensnaring the LV lead. At the 3-month follow-up, the absence of diaphragmatic stimulation was associated with a satisfactory LV pacing threshold and dramatic clinical improvement from effectual biventricular pacing.     

A Method for Permanent Transvenous Left Ventricular Pacing

LV-based pacing has recently been reported to be of benefit in patients with severe cardiac failure and left bundle branch block. LV permanent pacing has been reported using epicardial leads but the surgical mortality is excessive. A transvenous approach is now favored. In this regard, cannulation of the coronary sinus and of one of its tributaries using only the permanent electrode is feasible but technically challenging. We describe a "long guiding sheath" method using catheterization, and a long radiopaque and peelable sheath. Once the coronaiy sinus is cannulated with the electrophysiological catheter, the long sheath is advanced to the mid-part of the coronary sinus. The permanent pacing electrode is then placed through the sheath and into a tributary of the coronary sinus. This method has been attempted in 10 patients and was successful in 8, with an average lead insertion time of 21 ± 5.5 minutes and an average fluoroscopic time of 11 ± 5.5 minutes. In conclusion, although transvenous left ventricular pacing remains a challenge, the "long guiding sheath" approach appears to facilitate this procedure with both a high success rate and an acceptable procedure time.     

Long-term Stability of Endocardial Left Ventricular Pacing Leads Placed via the Coronary Sinus

Background: Left ventricular endocardial pacing leads placed via the coronary sinus (CS) are increasingly implanted to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); however, the long-term stability of these leads is unknown. We sought to determine the implant success and long-term stability of CS leads in our single center experience.
Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent CRT via implantation of the CS lead between January 1999 and December 2005 were included. Pacing thresholds at implant and during long-term follow-up were reviewed and the rate of acute (within 24 hours of implant) and chronic (>24 hours) lead failure was determined.
Results: A total of 512 patients (mean age 68 ± 12 years; 409 [80%] male) underwent CRT device implantation and were included. The CS lead implantation was successful on the initial implantation in 487 patients (95%) and subsequently successful in six patients (24%) in whom initial attempts were unsuccessful. Acute lead failure occurred in 25 patients (5.1%) and was most commonly due to persistent extra-cardiac stimulation. The rate of chronic lead failure was 4% in the first year and remained stable during long-term follow-up. The CS lead pacing thresholds remained stable with only minimal increase (1.42 ± 0.85 V/0.42 ± 0.25 ms vs 1.51 ± 1.05 V/0.47 ± 0.29 ms; P = 0.04).
Conclusions: Placement of a left ventricular pacing lead via the CS is feasible and safe in the vast majority of patients. Once placed, the CS leads remain stable with excellent pacing thresholds over the longer term.     

Transvenous Dual Site Left Ventricular Pacing to Lower Elevated Pacing Thresholds

Dual site left ventricular pacing through two left ventricular pacing leads, located in discrete vessels, significantly lowered pacing thresholds from 6 V at 1 ms and 4.25V at 0.5 ms through the leads individually, to 0.75V at 0.5 ms by utilizing a Y‐adaptor to connect the two leads. (PACE 2011; e6–e8)     

Clinical Significance of QRS Duration During Ventricular Pacing

To clarify the clinical significance of an abnormally prolonged paced QRS duration, we studied 114 patients who had undergone pacing for atrioventricular block (AVB). Patients were divided into two groups: group I consisted of 29 patients with at least one paced QRS duration greater than or equal to 180 msec during the follow-up period; group II consisted of 85 patients with paced QRS durations less than 180 msec. The clinical background, QRS complexes before pacing, and the echocardiographic findings were assessed. Males (P less than 0.05), those with H-V block (P less than 0.05) and a wider QRS complex of conducted and escape beats (both P less than 0.01) were dominant in group I. The incidence of underlying heart disease was greater in group I than in group II (83% vs 32%, P less than 0.01). Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and increased left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVDd) were more prominent in group I than in group II (LVEF 0.49 +/- 0.17 vs 0.68 +/- 0.10, P less than 0.01, LVDd 57.1 +/- 7.9 mm vs 48.5 +/- 5.6 mm, P less than 0.01). The paced QRS duration correlated with LVEF (r = -0.61) and LVDd (r = 0.81). A paced QRS duration greater than or equal to 180 msec was sensitive and specific for a LVEF less than 0.5 (83.3% and 85.2%) and LVDd greater than or equal to 60 mm (100% and 81.4%). We conclude that patients with a prolonged paced QRS duration have more serious heart disease, and the paced QRS duration can be a useful indicator of impaired LV function.     

Left Ventricular Pressure Measurement During Noninvasive Transcutaneous Cardiac Pacing

In a pacemaker-dependent patient, the hemodynamic response during external transcutaneous and endocardial sequential pacing was evaluated by left ventricular pressure monitoring. A single ventricular pacing mode with hemodynamic effect of atrioventricular asynchrony was shown during external pacing.     

Single Site Left Ventricular Pacing induced Dyssynchrony and Cardiomyopathy

Single site left ventricular (LV) pacing in the absence of intrinsic ventricular activity can be as detrimental to LV function as right ventricular apical pacing. This report describes a patient with complete heart block who developed significant dyssynchrony and cardiomyopathy secondary to single site lateral LV pacing. The process was reversed by placement of a second anterior LV lead. (PACE 2013; 36:e35–e37)     

Early Results of AV Sequential Pacing on Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction after Senning Procedure

Dual chamber pacing was shown to decrease left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 30 years ago. We report early results of AV sequential pacing from the LV apex in a patient with transposition of the great arteries who is post-Senning procedure. LVOT obstruction resulted from septal deviation and systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve. Pacing was indicated for sinus node dysfunction. AV sequential pacing with a short optimal A V interval of 60 ms demonstrated a 45% reduction in the degree of LVOT obstruction. This article suggests that LVOT obstruction after the Senning procedure can be palliated by asynchronous septal contraction induced by A V sequential pacing, even if the activation is from LV apex, and avoid or postpone surgery in selected situations.     

A New Endocardial "Over-the-Wire" or Stylet-Driven Left Ventricular Lead:

Transvenous left ventricular (LV) leads are primarily inserted "over-the-wire" (OTW). However, a stylet-driven (SD) approach may be a helpful alternative. A new polyurethane-coated, unipolar LV lead can be placed either by a stylet or a guide wire, which can be inserted into the lead body from both ends. The multicenter OVID study evaluates the clinical performance of this new steroid- and nonsteroid eluting lead. The primary endpoint is the LV lead implant success rate after identification of the coronary sinus (CS). Secondary endpoints include complication rate, short- and long-term lead characteristics, overall procedure and LV lead placement duration, total fluoroscopy time, and lead handling characteristics ratings. To date, 96 patients with heart failure (68 ± 9 years old, 76% men) are enrolled. The CS was identified in 95 patients and, in 85 (88.5%), the LV lead was successfully implanted. The final lead positioning was lateral in 41%, posterolateral in 35%, anterolateral in 18%, and great cardiac vein in 6% of patients. In 70%, the 85 successful implantations, both stylet-driven and guide-wire techniques were used, a stylet only was used in 22%, and a guide wire only in 8%. Mean overall duration of 85 successful procedures was 112 ± 40 minutes, total fluoroscopy time 28 ± 15 minutes, and the duration of LV lead placement was 35 ± 29 minutes. During a 3-month follow-up, the loss of LV capture occurred in three and phrenic nerve stimulation in six patients. The mean long-term pacing threshold is 0.8 V/0.5 ms and pacing impedance is 550 Ω. The OVID data suggest that these new leads are safe and effective. The choice of both OTW and SD techniques during lead implantation offers greater procedural flexibility.     

Transvenous Left Atrial and Left Ventricular Pacing in Ebstein's Anomaly with Severe Interatrial Conduction Block

The implantation of permanent pacemakers in patients with congenital heart disease can be challenging. This report describes the complexity of pacemaker implantation in a patient with Ebstein's disease, tricuspid valve replacement, and right atrial abnormalities like severe intra- and interatrial conduction block that prevented dual chamber pacing from conventional sites. This case illustrates the promising possibility to circumvent the interatrial conduction block with single left atrial pacing instead of biatrial pacing which was not suitable here.     

Ventricular Activation Onset-Triggered Left Ventricular Pacing:

Ventricular activation onset-triggered (VAOT) left ventricular pacing modalities synchronize left ventricular paced activation with existing intrinsic ventricular activation, in patients with complete LBBB and adequate rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of VAOT pacing with one left ventricular pacing lead, during temporary pacing in the postoperative period following open heart surgery. VAOT pacing was studied in five patients with LBBB and two patients with previously implanted right ventricular pacemakers. The VAOT pacing system used was assembled by modifying the function of existing equipment and its programming is described in detail. Comparative ECGs are reported, documenting the changes in ventricular activation produced by VAOT pacing. Stability of surface ECG acquisition was found to be essential to the success of temporary VAOT pacing and inappropriate pacing due to ECG instability is described. Patients were studied at rest and none experienced congestive heart failure. In the comparison of cardiac output, with and without VAOT pacing, no significant differences were found in LBBB patients or those with right ventricular pacemakers. In the comparison of arterial pressure, with and without VAOT pacing, no significant differences were found in six patients, however, in one LBBB patient with intrinsic predominant ventricular trigeminy, VAOT pacing was observed to have an antiarrhythmic effect resulting in suppression of ventricular ectopy and stabilization of arterial pressure. All patients survived VAOT pacing and the postoperative period without complications requiring additional intervention or treatment. (PACE 2004; 27[Pt. I]:730–739)     

Is Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Pacing an Alternative to Left Ventricular/Biventricular Pacing?

The right ventricular apex has been used as the traditional pacing site since the development of transvenous pacing in 1959. Some studies suggest that pacing the right ventricular apex may cause remodeling and is harmful. In the past decade, there have been a multitude of studies of the hemodynamic, electrophysiological, electrocardiographic, and clinical effects of ventricular pacing at other sites. Pacing of the left ventricle singly or with biventricular pacing has emerged as an effective and safe therapy for moderate to severe congestive heart failure in patients with prolonged QRS complexes. Studies of alternate right ventricular sites, like the right ventricular outflow tract, have given mixed results. Not all patients can be treated with left ventricular pacing, which is a time-consuming and difficult procedure. Right ventricular pacing is easier and less expensive than left ventricular pacing and further study of additional right ventricular sites seems warranted. (PACE 2004; 27[Pt. II]:871–877)     

Lead Extraction Via the Femoral Artery of a Left Ventricular Pacing Lead Inserted in the Subclavian Artery

We describe the extraction of a pacing lead via the femoral artery 5 months after it was inadvertently introduced through the right subclavian artery and positioned in the left ventricle. The lead was dislocated from the myocardium by traction from the subpectoral area and subsequently removed with a retriever inserted through the femoral artery in order to minimize the risk of cerebral embolization and bleeding at the entry site. Bleeding was controlled at the subclavian artery entry site by temporary inflation of a balloon catheter inserted through the brachial artery, and at the insertion site of the retriever in the femoral artery with a closure device. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:1544–1547)