The prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) Line: derivation of local INR with commercial thromboplastins and coagulometers – two independent studies

Summary. Background: The WHO scheme for prothrombin time (PT) standardization has been limited in application, because of its difficulties in implementation, particularly the need for mandatory manual PT testing and for local provision of thromboplastin international reference preparations (IRP). Methods: The value of a new simpler procedure to derive international normalized ratio (INR), the PT/INR Line, based on only five European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) calibrant plasmas certified by experienced centres has been assessed in two independent exercises using a range of commercial thromboplastins and coagulometers. INRs were compared with manual certified values with thromboplastin IRP from expert centres and in the second study also with INRs from local ISI calibrations. Results: In the first study with the PT/INR Line, 8.7% deviation from certified INRs was reduced to 1.1% with human reagents, and from 7.0% to 2.6% with rabbit reagents. In the second study, deviation was reduced from 11.2% to 0.4% with human reagents by both local ISI calibration and the PT/INR Line. With rabbit reagents, 10.4% deviation was reduced to 1.1% with both procedures; 4.9% deviation was reduced to 0.5% with bovine/combined reagents with local ISI calibrations and to 2.9% with the PT/INR Line. Mean INR dispersion was reduced with all thromboplastins and automated systems using the PT/INR Line. Conclusions: The procedure using the PT/INR Line provides reliable INR derivation without the need for WHO ISI calibration across the range of locally used commercial thromboplastins and automated PT systems included in two independent international studies.     

Guidelines on preparation, certification, and use of certified plasmas for ISI calibration and INR determination.

Reliable international normalized ratio (INR) determination depends on accurate values for international sensitivity index (ISI) and mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT). Local ISI calibration can be performed to obtain reliable INR. Alternatively, the laboratory may determine INR directly from a line relating local log(prothrombin time [PT]) to log(INR). This can be done by means of lyophilized or frozen plasmas to which certified values of PT or INR have been assigned. Currently there is one procedure for local calibration with certified plasmas which is a modification of the WHO method of ISI determination. In the other procedure, named 'direct' INR determination, certified plasmas are used to calculate a line relating log(PT) to log(INR). The number of certified plasmas for each procedure depends on the method of preparation and type of plasma. Lyophilization of plasma may induce variable effects on the INR, the magnitude of which depends on the type of thromboplastin used. Consequently, the manufacturer or supplier of certified plasmas must assign the values for different (reference) thromboplastins and validate the procedure for reliable ISI calibration or 'direct' INR determination. Certification of plasmas should be performed by at least three laboratories. Multiple values should be assigned if the differences between thromboplastin systems are greater than 10%. Testing of certified plasmas for ISI calibration may be performed in quadruplicate in the same working session. It is recommended to repeat the measurements on three sessions or days to control day-to-day variation. Testing of certified plasmas for 'direct' INR determination should be performed in at least three sessions or days. Correlation lines for ISI calibration and for 'direct' INR determination should be calculated by means of orthogonal regression. Quality assessment of the INR with certified plasmas should be performed regularly and should be repeated whenever there is a change in reagent batch or in instrument. Discrepant results obtained by users of certified plasmas should be reported to manufacturers or suppliers.     

仪器对凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值的影响及校正

为了评价血凝仪对国际标准化比值的影响。模拟ＷＨＯ标定凝血质的参比方法，用一种已 知国际敏感指标的凝血质对两种血凝仪的特异性ＩＳＩ进行标定，并以ＩＮＲ形式报告ＰＴ结果。     

凝血酶原时间ISI/INR系统测定中的一些问题及改进意见

目的对凝血酶原时间(PT)测定ISI/INR系统出现的一些问题提出相应的改进建议。方法对上海市12家医院在用的仪器和匹配的PT试剂,对日常使用的正常血浆平均凝血酶原时间(MNPT)作调研实测,将结果进行分析;调查试剂的仪器特定(spec ific)国际敏感度指数(ISI)值与世界卫生组织(WHO)的手工法ISI定标值之间的差异;用2种已知国际标准化比值(INR)的异常参比血浆代替WHO的ISI系统作质控并行比较。结果12家中有4家日常使用的平均正常凝血酶原时间(MNPT)明显偏离实测值,分别为0.8、0.9、1.0和1.8 s。用WHO CRM149R参比,用手工法标定的凝血活酶和109 mmol枸橼酸钠抗凝的不同PT值血标本,在Sysm ex1500型、C.2000型仪器上测定试剂的仪器特定ISI,其结果比手工法分别减少4.1%和4.7%,但采用HEPES-枸橼酸钠抗凝剂标本时,2种型号仪器的特定ISI比手工法分别减少16.7%及7.7%。用已知INR异常参比血浆,国产品与进口品对照的结果良好。结论受调研12家中,有4家血凝分析仪器调研时实测的MNPT明显偏离日常使用值。有几家医院试剂的仪器特定ISI值也存在问题,建议纠正。用已知INR异常参比血浆代替WHO手工法标定凝血活酶ISI法作质控,使用简便,又不需MNPT参数,值得推广。     

Comparison of local International Sensitivity Index calibration and ''Direct INR'' methods in correction of locally reported International Normalized Ratios: an international study

BACKGROUND: It is no longer feasible to check local International Normalized Ratios (INR) by the World Health Organization International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibrations because the necessary manual prothrombin time technique required has generally been discarded. OBJECTIVES: An international collaborative study at 77 centers has compared local INR correction using the two alternative methods recommended in the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidelines: local ISI calibration and 'Direct INR'. METHODS: Success of INR correction by local ISI calibration and with Direct INR was assessed with a set of 27 certified lyophilized plasmas (20 from patients on warfarin and seven from normals). RESULTS: At 49 centers using human thromboplastins, 3.0% initial average local INR deviation from certified INR was reduced by local ISI calibration to 0.7%, and at 25 centers using rabbit reagents, from 15.9% to 7.5%. With a minority of commercial thromboplastins, mainly 'combined' rabbit reagents, INR correction was not achieved by local ISI calibration. However, when rabbit combined reagents were excluded the overall mean INR deviation after correction was reduced further to 3.9%. In contrast, with Direct INR, mean deviation using human thromboplastins increased from 3.0% to 6.6%, but there was some reduction with rabbit reagents from 15.9% to 10% (12.3% with combined reagents excluded). CONCLUSIONS: Local ISI calibration gave INR correction for the majority of PT systems but failed at the small number using combined rabbit reagents suggesting a need for a combined reference thromboplastin. Direct INR correction was disappointing but better than local ISI calibration with combined rabbit reagents. Interlaboratory variability was improved by both procedures with human reagents only.     

A comparison of INRs after local calibration of thromboplastin international sensitivity indexes.

There are approximately 300 reagent/instrument combinations for performing prothrombin times/international normalized ratios (PT/INR) in the United States. Manufacturers and laboratories continually struggle to ensure that the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of their thromboplastin is accurate for assaying PT/INR. OBJECTIVE: This study reports the feasibility of a new method to locally calibrate ISI of thromboplastin using the mechanical STA automated coagulation analyzer (Diagnostica-Stago Inc.) and two photo-optic coagulation analyzers, the BCS (Dade-Behring) and CA-540 (Sysmex). DESIGN: Neoplastine CI+ (CI+) (Diagnostica-Stago Inc); Thromboplastin C+ (TC+); Thromborel S (TRS); and Innovin (I) (Dade-Behring) were used in this study. A mean normal PT (MNPT) was determined for each reagent/instrument combination using samples from 25 normal individuals. Manufacturer instrument specific ISI values were not available for the STA with TC+, TRS and I. The CA540 had no ISI value for CI+ and the BCS system had no manufacturer assigned ISI values for TC+ and I; generic photo-optic and mechanical ISI manufacturer values were used for these two systems. Local on-site calibration was performed using frozen plasma calibrators to determine ISI values for each thromboplastin. Post-calibration, 95 patient samples were assayed for each reagent/instrument system combination using the manufacturer ISI and the local calibrated ISI to determine the INR result. PATIENTS: Patients from whom samples were obtained included five with a lupus anticoagulant, 30 on heparin therapy, and 60 on coumadin therapy. RESULTS: Differences between manufacturer versus local calibrated ISI ranged from 0.9% to 18.9% for normal sample INRs and from 0.8% to 16.4% for patient sample INRs. The number (or proportion) of patient specimens with clinically significantly different INR values (>10.0% difference) ranged from zero for several reagent combinations to more than half (or >50.0%) of those tested for several other combinations. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that by locally calibrating ISI values, each laboratory may eliminate variability and guesswork between different reagent/instrument systems for ISI values when performing PT/INR assays and potentially improve the clinical accuracy of their patients' PT/INR results.     

血浆凝血酶原时间测定中建立仪器区域国际敏感指数的实验探讨

目的　探讨临床口服抗凝治疗时血浆凝血酶原时间 (PT)监测的标准化 ,为临床提供比较准确的PT 国际标准化比值 (PT INR)结果。方法　使用PT INR校准血浆建立PT测定试剂在不同仪器上的区域性国际敏感度指数 (LocalISI) ,以此对新鲜血浆进行PT测定。结果　未经LocalISI校准的PT试剂测定血浆的PT时 ,INR结果差异较大 (P <0 .0 1)。试剂经LocalISI校准后 ,测定血浆PT时 ,INR结果良好 (P >0 .0 5及Kap pa >0 .75 )。 结论　在PT测定时 ,只要建立仪器和测定试剂的LocalISI ,INR结果就具有较好的一致性。     

International normalized ratio in the prothrombin test: clinical significance and use

The safety and efficiency of therapy by peroral anticoagulants (PA) depend on a laboratory monitoring based on the prothrombin test (PT). The test is distinguished through its variability conditioned by different means of results' presentation as well as through the sensitivity of thromboplastin and a type of a device used in coagulation detection. WHO recommended, 1983, to standardize the thromboplastin preparations through adjusting their sensitivity (the so-called International Sensitivity Index--ISI) to blood coagulation defects induced by PA versus the primary international reference thromboplastin. Thromboplastin ISI as well as the mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) of blood plasma are used to calculate the international normalized ratio (INR). The presentation of PT results as INR is justified exclusively for the PA-therapy stabilized patients. The INR system makes it possible to optimize the PA therapy only if the laboratory expert and clinician can clearly understand the PT standardization essence and observe the key WHO recommendations, i.e. definition of a coagulometer-specific ISI by manufacturing companies, estimation of MNPT by laboratories and use of the correct anticoagulant concentration.     

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA): an assessment of a method for ISI calibration of two whole blood point-of-care PT monitor systems based on lyophilized plasmas using whole blood equivalent PT

Summary.  Previously, the attempt to simplify the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibration of the CoaguChek Mini whole blood point-of-care test prothrombin time (PT) monitor system was successful using lyophilized plasmas from coumarin-treated patients but not with lyophilized artificially depleted plasmas. With the TAS PT-NC monitor system, both types of plasma failed to provide reliable calibrations. The present study assesses a procedure for the ISI calibration of a TAS PT-NC and CoaguChek Mini whole blood point-of-care test PT monitor systems using lyophilized plasmas. Using lyophilized artificially depleted and coumarin plasma calibrations, we have evaluated a correction for the monitor displayed PT. This was based on a 'line of equivalence' derived from the relationship between whole blood and fresh plasma PT with both types of monitor system. With the TAS PT-NC, the use of this 'line of equivalence' resulted in reliable ISI with both lyophilized coumarin and artificially depleted plasmas. There was no significant difference between mean monitor and mean reference International Normalized Ratio (INR) with the artificially depleted plasmas. With the lyophilized coumarin plasma calibrations there was only a small INR difference. Correction with the 'line of equivalence' therefore facilitates calibration of the TAS PT-NC with lyophilized plasmas. With the CoaguChek Mini, the correction based on the 'line of equivalence' did not improve results but was not required with this system.     

Effect of lepirudin on the international normalized ratio

BACKGROUND: Many patients receiving direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) therapy require transition to warfarin. This transition may be complicated by DTI-induced elevations in the international normalized ratio (INR). While the effect of argatroban on the INR has been characterized, data assessing the effect of lepirudin on the INR are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of lepirudin on the INR. METHODS: Patients receiving lepirudin therapy between January 2000 and May 2001 were identified using the pharmacy database, and a retrospective chart review was conducted. Patients were included for analysis if they had paired activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and INR data while receiving lepirudin monotherapy. RESULTS: Fifty-three paired aPTT and INR data points from 8 patients receiving lepirudin monotherapy were collected. The Organon MDA 180 instrument was used for aPTT and prothrombin time (PT) determination. Organon MDA Platelin L reagent was used for the aPTT and Organon Simplastin L reagent was used for the PT. The international sensitivity index (ISI) of the Simplastin L thromboplastin was 2.0. The mean +/- SD lepirudin dose was 0.05 +/- 0.04 mg/kg/h. Linear regression was used to identify the INRs that correspond to a therapeutic aPTT value of 45-75 seconds (1.5-2.5 times mean laboratory normal of 30 sec). The correlation between aPTT and INR was 0.77. An aPTT of 45-75 seconds with lepirudin correlated to an INR of 1.6-3.2. CONCLUSIONS: Based on laboratory results, when using a thromboplastin with an ISI of 2, lepirudin appears to elevate the INR in the absence of warfarin.     

The effect of instruments for prothrombin time testing on the international normalized ratio

Prothrombin time (PT) testing is used for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy, its result being usually expressed as international normalized ratio (INR). This is done using the international sensitivity index (ISI) specific of thromboplastin employed to carry out the test. In this way a good PT standardization may be achieved although the instruments used to calibrate the thromboplastins might influence the ISI value. Presented at the ‘2nd International Symposium on Standardization and Quality Control of Coagulation Tests: Implications for the Clinical Laboratory’, Rome, September 28–29, 1989.     

Use of lyophilized calibrant plasmas for simplified international normalized ratio determination with a human tissue factor thromboplastin reagent derived from cultured human cells

BACKGROUND: For monitoring of treatment with oral anticoagulants, the clotting time obtained in the prothrombin time (PT) test is transformed to the International Normalized Ratio (INR) with use of a system-specific International Sensitivity Index (ISI). The calibrant plasma procedure (CPP) is an alternative approach to INR calculation based on the use of a set of lyophilized plasmas with assigned INRs. METHODS: With the CPP, a linear relationship is established between log(PT) and log(INR), using orthogonal regression. CPP was validated for Simplastin HTF, a new human tissue factor reagent derived from cultured human cells. CPP precision was assessed as the CV of the slope of the regression line. The accuracy of the CPP was determined by comparing the INR obtained with the CPP with that obtained with the established ISI-based reference method. INRs of the calibrants were assigned by different routes: by manufacturer (consensus labeling) or by use of Simplastin HTF or International Reference Preparations (IRPs; rTF/95 or RBT/90). RESULTS: The mean CV of the CPP regression slope ranged from 1.0% (Simplastin HTF reagent-specific INR) to 2.4% (INR assigned with rTF/95). INRs calculated with the CPP were similar to those obtained with the reference method, but when the routes for assigning INRs to the calibrant plasmas were compared, the mean difference in INR between CPP and the reference method was smaller with Simplastin HTF reagent-specific values. In several (but not all) cases, this difference was significant (P <0.05, t-test). CONCLUSION: CPP can be used for local INR determination, but better precision and accuracy are obtained with reagent-specific INRs compared with INR assignment by consensus labeling or IRP.     

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation. Evaluation of a method for International Sensitivity Index calibration of two point-of-care prothrombin time (PT) monitoring systems (CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC) with fresh plasmas based on whole-blood equivalent PT

BACKGROUND: The International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibration of whole-blood prothrombin time (PT) monitors for point-of-care testing (POCT) described by Tripodi et al. (Thromb Haemost 1993;70:921-4) has been shown to be dependable but is too complex and demanding. The use of plasma would simplify calibration of whole-blood POCT PT monitors, but important differences may exist between the ISI for whole blood and plasma calibrations. METHODS: In a 10-center calibration study of two POCT whole-blood monitoring systems (CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC), we characterized the relationship between the log PT for whole blood and fresh plasma with use of single lots of test strips/cards. This relationship (linear) was used to correct the difference between the whole-blood and plasma ISI. The reliability of the correction with different lots of test strips/cards was assessed at three centers. The linear relationship was used to correct the difference in the whole-blood and plasma ISI with four other lots of TAS PT-NC cards and with two additional lots of CoaguChek Mini test strips. RESULTS: The correction decreased the ISI difference from 13.3% to 0.9% for the TAS PT-NC and from 5.7% to 0.6% for the CoaguChek Mini. In assessments at three centers, which included different lots of test strips/cards, the mean ISI difference was markedly decreased with the TAS PT-NC but not with the CoaguChek Mini, for which the mean ISI difference increased slightly. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed correction resolves the discrepancy between whole-blood and fresh plasma ISI calibrations with TAS PT-NC test cards. The CoaguChek Mini systems could be calibrated without this correction.     

Laboratory control over warfarin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome

AIM: To elicit the most sensitive and reliable method of control over administration of indirect anticoagulants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty patients with acute coronary syndrome were studied. They received varfarin under the control of international normalized ratio (INR) calculated by the tables in cases of prothrombin time (PT) estimation on a stationary turbidynamic hemocoagulometer from venous and capillary blood by thromboplastins. In parallel, PT was estimated from whole capillary blood on individual portable coagulometer "Coagu Check C" by means of standard test-strip (prothrombin test--PT) on the study day 1, 3, 5, 7, 14 and 21. The results were assessed on the study day 21. All the patients were treated in hospital then outpatiently. RESULTS: The assessment of PT results implied calculation of variation coefficient (VC) and error (m) by each index obtained with thromboplastins. VS and m were the lowest when INR was made from whole capillary blood on coagulometer "Coagu Check C". CONCLUSION: An optimal method of control over efficacy of varfarin treatment is calculation of INR from capillary blood on coagulometer "Coagu Check C" as calculation of INR from capillary and venous blood on stationary coagulometer is complicated and reliability depends on thromboplastin used.     

Protocol for the evaluation of automated blood coagulation instruments (coagulometers) for determination of the international normalised ratio

Results of prothrombin time tests for the control of oral anticoagulant therapy, when using automated blood coagulation instruments (coagulometers), may not be the same as those obtained when using manual methods, and variation in coagulometer performance may affect clinical interpretation of data. The haematology advisory committee of the Institute of Medical Laboratory Sciences has recommended that coagulometers should be used for determination of prothrombin times only if it can be demonstrated that the results are valid when compared with those of a standardised manual method. A protocol for the evaluation of coagulometers, and details of the procedures, are given in this report, the main emphasis of which is on the assessment of instruments for determination of the International Normalised Ratio. Guidelines are also provided for the general use of machines of this type and for the assessment of safety. The principles of the protocol are applicable to other automated tests of blood coagulation.     

Precision and accuracy of point‐of‐care testing coagulometers used for self‐testing and self‐management of oral anticoagulation therapy

Summary. Background: Oral anticoagulation therapy is monitored by the use of the International Normalized Ratio (INR). Patients who perform self‐testing or self‐management use a point‐of‐care testing (POCT) coagulometer (INR monitor) to estimate their INRs. A precondition for a correct dosage of coumarins is a correct INR estimation, and the method and apparatus used for providing the INR measurements are crucial in this context. Several studies have been published regarding the precision and accuracy of these POCT coagulometers, and have led to diverse conclusions. It is difficult and challenging to perform an overview of the literature, owing to the vast amount of papers, with differences in design, statistical analysis, etc. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the current literature, especially regarding the precision and accuracy of the POCT coagulometers, to provide recommendations for clinical use and quality control, and to point out areas for future research. Methods: We included a total of 22 studies, of which four were characterized as high‐quality studies. Results: The precision of the POCT coagulometers was generally adequate for clinical use. Their performance in terms of accuracy has to be viewed in the context of the inherent inaccuracies of INR measurements. Conclusions: The accuracy of POCT coagulometers seems, in this respect, to be generally acceptable, and they can be used in a clinical setting.     

Inaccuracy of international normalized ratio (INR) measurements and suggestions for improved WHO guidelines for calibration of reference preparations – a statistical study

Summary.  Numerous empirical studies show that the accuracy of international normalized ratio (INR) measurements is unsatisfactory and worse than generally expected. We demonstrate that a plausible reason for this large inaccuracy is a conventional calibration procedure of reference preparations with (i) an erroneous assumption that the line relating logarithmic prothrombin times (log PTs) of patients passes through the mean log PT of the 'normal' population (mean normal PT); (ii) non-perceived interactions between patients and PT systems; and (iii) systematic exclusions of 'outliers'. The same conventional procedure also results in serious overestimation of the accuracy of INR measurements, thus leading to a false sense of security in oral anticoagulant therapy. In an example with data from WHO guidelines, we show that the systematic overprediction of INR (which is believed to be 0) may be as large as 5%, when prediction is performed under the conventional WHO model. Under the same model the CV of the predicted vs. the true INR is believed to be only about 1% when it in reality is more than 4%. We suggest that the conventional calibration procedure is modified in order to reduce the twofold negative impact of lower true accuracy and overestimated reported accuracy on oral anticoagulant therapy and to allow for an unambiguous definition of true INR values.     

Clinical utilization of the international normalized ratio (INR)

The prothrombin time (PT) is one of the most important laboratory tests to determine the functionality of the blood coagulation system. It is used in patient care to diagnose diseases of coagulation, assess the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing operative procedures, monitor patients being treated with oral anticoagulant (coumadin) therapy, and evaluate liver function. The PT is performed by measuring the clotting time of platelet-poor plasma after the addition of calcium and thromboplastin, a combination of tissue factor and phospholipid. Intra- and interlaboratory variation in the PT was a significant problem for clinical laboratories in the past, when crude extracts of rabbit brain or human placenta were the only source of thromboplastin. The international normalized ratio (INR), developed by the World Health Organization in the early 1980s, is designed to eliminate problems in oral anticoagulant therapy caused by variability in the sensitivity of different commercial sources and different lots of thromboplastin to blood coagulation factor VII. The INR is used worldwide by most laboratories performing oral anticoagulation monitoring, and is routinely incorporated into dosage planning for patients receiving warfarin. Although the recent availability of sensitive PT reagents prepared from recombinant human tissue factor (rHTF) and synthetic phospholipids eliminated many of the earlier problems associated with the use of crude thromboplastin preparations, local instrument variability in the INR still remains a problem. Presently, the use of plasma calibrants seems the best solution to this problem. Standardizing the point-of-care instruments for INR monitoring is another dilemma faced by the industry. Ultimately, new generations of anticoagulant drugs may eliminate the need for laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant therapy.     

European concerted action on anticoagulation. Use of plasma samples to derive international sensitivity index for whole-blood prothrombin time monitors.

BACKGROUND: To simplify International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibration, the possibility of substituting fresh plasma for fresh whole-blood samples with point-of-care testing (POCT) whole-blood monitors was investigated in a three-center study of three different POCT systems. METHODS: A modified full WHO calibration procedure based on 20 healthy controls and 60 coumarin-treated patients was performed on three monitoring systems with whole-blood and plasma samples against plasma tested using the European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) rabbit reference plain thromboplastin and the manual prothrombin time (PT) method. RESULTS: With one of the three systems, the mean ISI was 1.51 for whole blood and 1.49 for plasma; with the second system, the mean ISI was 1.08 for both whole blood and plasma. With the third system, however, the difference between the mean ISI for whole blood and that for plasma was greater (1.15 and 1.01, respectively). Overall, the precision of the calibrations was less than with traditional manual plasma PT testing. CONCLUSIONS: Provided that an appropriate calcium chloride concentration is used, the plasma PT results can be used for accurate ISI calibration of two of these three whole-blood POCT systems. Precision criteria need to be modified for POCT monitors.     

International multicenter international sensitivity index (ISI) calibration of a new human tissue factor thromboplastin reagent derived from cultured human cells

Summary.  The international sensitivity index (ISI) of the first working standard of Simplastin HTF, a new human tissue factor thromboplastin derived from cultured human cells, has been assessed in a calibration exercise in two Canadian and five European laboratories. Calibrations against international reference preparations (IRP) were performed for the manual method and six types of automated coagulometers that cover the majority of clotting endpoint principles in routine use. The ISI was method-dependent and varied between 1.03 and 1.29 when calibrated against rTF/95 (human IRP). The ISI was also dependent on the route of calibration. Compared with calibration against rTF/95, the ISIs obtained by calibration against RBT/90 (rabbit IRP) were on average 4.4% higher ( P  < 0.005). Considering the principle of 'like vs. like', the ISIs obtained by calibration against rTF/95 should be preferred.