Complete rotational burst fracture of the third lumbar vertebra managed by posterior surgery. A case report

STUDY DESIGN: Case report of a young man with rotational burst fracture of the third lumbar vertebra, treated by posterior surgery. OBJECTIVES: To describe the management of a rotational burst fracture of the third lumbar vertebra by posterior surgery consisting of reduction, decompression, fusion, and transpedicular instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgery is the generally recommended means of managing lumbar burst fractures with neurologic deficit. Some surgeons recommend anterior decompression, fusion, and instrumentation. Posterior surgery with decompression through laminectomy, spongioplasty of the vertebral body, interbody fusion of damaged discs, posterolateral fusion, and transpedicular fixation is also a safe and successful management technique. The combined approach consists of posterior decompression, fusion, transpedicular fixation, and anterior fusion using pelvic autografts. The optimum method of management remains in question. METHOD: An 18-year-old man with complete rotational burst fracture of the third lumbar vertebra was treated by posterior surgery. This surgery consisted of reduction, laminectomy, decompression, structure of dural sac tears, spongioplasty of the vertebral body, interbody fusion of both damaged discs, and the implantation of a transpedicular Socon fixator (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany), including a transverse connector. The case was documented by radiographs and computed tomography scans before surgery and after fixator removal 19 months after surgery. RESULTS: The patient healed solidly with no instrumentation failure. The neurologic deficit Frankel Grade B improved to Frankel Grade D. CONCLUSION: Surgery to manage lumbar burst fracture must include reduction, decompression, restoration and fusion of anterior and posterior elements by using autologous pelvic spongious autografts, and anterior or posterior instrumentation. Posterior surgery including suturing of dural sac tears, fusion of damaged structures, and transpedicular fixation is successful in young patients and patients with good bone quality.     

合并椎板骨折的L_2-L_5爆裂性骨折伴硬膜及马尾神经卡压

目的 探讨合并椎板骨折的L2-L5爆裂性骨折中硬脊膜撕裂及马尾神经卡压的创伤机制、发生率,以及哪些临床和影像学表现有助于术前判断硬脊膜撕裂和马尾神经卡压.方法 对36例行手术治疗的合并椎板骨折的L2-L5爆裂性骨折进行回顾性分析.结果 36例中,16例(44.4%)并发硬脊膜撕裂,有硬脊膜撕裂的患者神经损伤程度明显重于无硬脊膜撕裂的患者,前者伤椎椎弓根间距增宽率明显高于后者.结论 对于椎板骨折,尤其是裂缝骨折的患者,术前很难通过影像学表现明确判断是否有硬脊膜撕裂及马尾神经卡压.因此只要怀疑有硬脊膜撕裂,应首先选择后路手术方案,任何复位操作宜在椎管减压之后进行.     

Dural tears in lumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures

STUDY DESIGN: This study investigated the incidence, predictions, and treatment principles of greenstick lamina fractures in lumbar burst fractures. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of dural tears in lumbar burst fracture with greenstick lamina fracture and to find out if any specific clinical and radiographic factors or intraoperative pathologic findings are predictive of dural tears and nerve root entrapment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A retrospective review was conducted on 45 patients with 47 lumbar burst fractures treated operatively. Ages ranged from 15 to 70 years (average, 33 years). The duration of follow-up ranged from 32 months to 8 years (average, 52 months). METHODS: All clinical charts and radiologic data of these patients were reviewed. Age, sex, etiology, and all the radiologic parameters were analyzed for their association with greenstick lamina fracture and dural tear. Student's t test and multiple logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Greenstick lamina fracture occurred in 20 (42.5%) of 47 burst fractures. Dural tear was detected in 9 (19%) of 47 burst fractures and was predominantly higher in L3 (6 of 9 burst fractures). According to multiple logistic regression analysis of the data, a 20% increase in the interpedicular distance gives a 79% probability of greenstick lamina fracture. The distance between the edges of greenstick lamina fractures was obviously higher in fractures with dural tear. Neurologic status was completely normal before surgery in three of the patients with dural tear and nerve root entrapment. CONCLUSIONS: It is not possible to detect dural tear and nerve root entrapment in greenstick lamina fracture before surgery. Therefore, if there is any suspicion of such an occurrence, it should be the rule to begin with posterior approach and use the open book technique to expose the dura safely before any reduction maneuver.     

Thoracolumbar flexion-distraction injuries combined with vertebral body fractures

Surgery was performed on 25 patients with combination injuries (flexion-distraction injury plus vertebral body fracture): 8 patients with anterior-column failure (compression) and 17 patients with anterior-column plus middle-column failure (burst). Patients with compression received posterior instrumentation and underwent fusion; patients with burst received posterior instrumentation and later underwent anterior decompression and fusion. Eleven patients in the burst group had a neurologic deficit. Single dural tears were discovered in 7 patients during the posterior-instrumentation procedure. By the end of the follow-up period (mean, 34.4 months; range, 18-76 months), neither implant failure nor loss of correction had occurred. Combined mechanisms may go unrecognized and thereby result in increased morbidity and inappropriate treatment. Proper evaluation of the posterior elements is of utmost importance for the diagnosis of flexion-distraction injuries with vertebral body fractures. After diagnosis, treatment should be started with a posterior procedure.     

Anterior dural laceration caused by thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures

A retrospective review of the records of 60 patients with thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures was undertaken to document the incidence and evaluate the sequelae of dural injuries found during anterior procedures. In the entire series, six (10%) patients each had a preexisting vertically oriented dural tear. All patients with anterior dural lacerations were male and had associated neurologic deficits. In all six patients, preoperative computed tomography showed an asymmetrically retropulsed bone fragment. Dural tears were repaired primarily. A postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak developed into the chest cavity of one patient, who was treated successfully with subarachnoid drainage. In patients with anterior dural laceration, primary repair is warranted and can be performed more easily after intraoperative correction of kyphosis. Subarachnoid drainage may be effective in cases of continued postoperative anterior cerebrospinal fluid leakage before repeated operation is considered.     

Importance of greenstick lamina fractures in low lumbar burst fractures

Lumbar burst fractures (L3-L5) represent a small percentage of all spinal fractures. The treatment of fractures involving the lumbar spine has been controversial. Lamina fractures may be complete or of the greenstick type. Dural tears and nerve root entrapment may accompany these lamina fractures. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the incidence of dural tear in patients who had lumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures and the importance of these lamina fractures when choosing the optimum treatment. Twenty-six patients with 28 lumbar burst fractures were treated from 1995 through 2002. The average follow-up was 60 months (range 32-110 months). The male to female ratio was 21:5 and the mean age was 37 years (17-64). Dural tear was detected in seven (25%) out of 28 burst fractures. The functional outcome of the entire study group was assessed using the Smiley-Webster Scale. Good to excellent results were obtained in 24 (92%) of 26 patients. Lumbar burst fractures with greenstick lamina fractures occur mostly in the L2-L4 area. In the surgical treatment, any reduction manoeuvre will close the fracture and crush the entrapped neural elements. Therefore, it may be better to explore the greenstick lamina fracture whether there is any neural entrapment or not, before any reduction manoeuvre is attempted.     

Dural laceration occurring with burst fractures and associated laminar fractures

The cases of sixty patients in whom a burst fracture of a thoracic or lumbar vertebral body had been treated with posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis less than two weeks after the injury were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty of the patients had an associated laminar fracture. Eleven of the thirty, all of whom had a lumbar fracture and a preoperative neurological deficit, were noted at operation to have dural laceration. In four of the patients who had dural laceration, neural elements were entrapped between the fragments from the laminar fracture. None of the remaining thirty patients who did not have a laminar fracture had dural laceration (p = 0.0002). Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis revealed no significant association of the dural laceration with the patients' age or sex, or with the radiographic characteristics of the spine. There was a significant association between dural laceration and neurological deficit (p = 0.0001). In our series, the presence of a preoperative neurological deficit in a patient who had a burst fracture and an associated laminar fracture was a sensitive (100 per cent) and specific (74 per cent) predictor of dural laceration. The presence of this fracture pattern and an associated neurological deficit also predicted a risk of dural laceration with entrapped neural elements. This information may influence decisions as to whether an anterior or a posterior surgical approach should be used in such patients.     

Low lumbar burst fractures: a unique fracture mechanism sustained in our current overseas conflicts

Background contextThe most common location for burst fractures occurs at the thoracolumbar junction, where the stiff thoracic spine meets the more flexible lumbar spine. With our current military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, we have seen a disproportionate number of low lumbar burst fractures.PurposeTo report our institutional experience in the management of low lumbar burst fractures.Study designRetrospective review.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of medical records and radiographs for all patients treated at our institution with combat-related injuries and thoracolumbar fractures. We included all patients who had sustained a burst fracture from T12 to L5 and had at least 1-year clinical follow-up.ResultsThirty-two patients sustained burst fractures. Nineteen patients (59.4%) had low lumbar (L3–L5) burst fractures, and 12 patients (37.5%) had thoracolumbar junction (T12–L2) burst fractures as their primary injury. Additionally, seven patients sustained less severe burst fractures at an additional level. One patient sustained burst fractures at both upper and lower lumbar levels. Of the low lumbar fractures, 52.6% had evidence of neurologic injury, two of which were complete. Similarly, in the upper lumbar group, 58.2% sustained a neurologic injury, two of which were complete. Twenty-two patients underwent surgical intervention, complicated by infection in 18%. At most recent follow-up, all but one patient with presenting neurologic injury had persistent deficits.ConclusionLow lumbar burst fractures are the predominant combat-related spine injury in our current military conflicts. The rigidity offered by current body armor may effectively lower the transition zone that normally occurs at the thoracolumbar junction, thereby, transferring forces into the lower lumbar spine. Increased awareness of this fracture pattern is warranted by all surgeons because of unique clinical challenges associated with its treatment. Although the incidence is increased in the military population, other surgeons may be involved with long-term care of these patients on completion of their military service.     

Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit. A comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment

The treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficit remains controversial. The present study is a retrospective analysis of 52 of these acute burst fractures among 104 cases of thoracolumbar burst fractures treated either operatively or nonoperatively. Results are expressed in terms of neurologic function, pain, work status, and complications. All patients who had surgical treatment and no unrelated disability returned to full-time work. Twenty-five percent of the patients treated nonoperatively were unable to return to work full time. Of the patients in the nonoperative group, 17% developed neurologic problems. Prophylactic stabilization and fusion of acute burst fractures without neurologic deficit have significant advantages over conservative management.     

胸腰椎爆裂骨折损伤部位和椎管内占位程度与神经损伤的关系

目的探讨胸腰椎爆裂骨折骨折部位及椎管内骨块占位程度与神经损伤的关系。方法对213例胸腰椎爆裂骨折根据骨折部位及CT测出的椎管内骨折骨块占位程度与神经损伤进行分析评定。结果神经损伤组椎管骨折骨块占位程度明显高于无神经损伤组;在有神经损伤情况下,骨折部位椎管内骨块占位程度腰段大于胸腰段;神经损伤程度与椎管内骨块占位程度无显著相关。结论胸腰椎爆裂骨折椎管内骨块占位压迫是神经损伤的重要因素;神经损伤与骨折部位和椎管内骨块占位程度联合相关。     

The management of burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Experience in 53 patients

The optimal treatment of "burst" fractures is one of the more controversial topics in spinal reconstructive surgery. While it is generally considered a stable fracture, recent trends toward operative treatment of burst injuries have raised questions regarding the necessity of stabilization and decompression. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who presented at the University of Minnesota Hospitals from 1970 to 1980 with closed thoracolumbar spinal fractures. In 354 of 399 patients, records and roentgenograms were adequate for review. Using strict x-ray criteria for classification, 59 patients were found to have burst fractures. One-year follow-up was available on 53 patients. There were 10 thoracic and 43 lumbar fractures. Thirty-one patients had associated injuries. Eleven patients had other spinal fractures. Thirty-eight patients demonstrated neurologic deficits. Twenty-two patients were initially treated nonoperatively, and 31 had early surgery. Operations included laminectomy, posterolateral decompression, posterior spinal fusion usually with Harrington rod instrumentation, and anterior spinal fusion. At follow-up, which averaged more than 3 years, neurologic improvement was found in 68% of the surgical patients who had presented initially with a neurologic deficit. Six patients treated nonoperatively later required surgery. Back pain was more common in the surgical group, disability less common. Radiographic follow-up revealed little increase in deformity in either group. The findings in this study suggest that nonsurgical treatment of patients with burst fractures and normal neurologic function is not likely to result in neurologic deterioration or progressive deformity, but in those with neural deficits, significant neurologic improvement is unlikely, and neurologic deterioration may occur.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Functional outcome of low lumbar burst fractures. A multicenter review of operative and nonoperative treatment of L3-L5.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 42 patients treated at three major medical centers for burst fractures of L3, L4, and L5. This is the largest low lumbar (L3-L5) burst fracture study in the literature to date. The study was designed to assess both radiographic and clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients treated during a 16-year period. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine whether conservatively treated patients with low lumbar burst fractures had satisfactory outcomes compared with those in a surgically treated cohort of patients. The study included patients with and without neurologic deficits. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Burst fractures of the low lumbar spine (L3-L5) represent a small percentage of all spine fractures. The iliolumbar ligaments and location below the pelvic brim are two stabilizing factors that are unique to these fractures when compared with burst fractures at the thoracolumbar junction. METHODS: Forty-two (n = 42) patients with low lumbar burst fractures were identified from 1980 through 1996. Medical records, radiographs, and follow-up Dallas Pain Questionnaires were obtained. Loss of anterior vertebral height, kyphotic angulation, and amount of retropulsion were recorded at several phases of treatment. Mean follow-up time was 45.2 months (range, 5-132 months). Twenty patients were treated without surgery (18 were neurologically intact, and 2 had isolated nerve root injury), and 22 underwent surgery (14 had neurologic injury, 8 were intact). RESULTS: No patient showed neurologic deterioration, regardless of treatment. Fracture of the third lumbar segment showed the greatest tendency toward kyphotic collapse and loss of height in the nonoperative group, although this was not reflected in the final functional outcome of both groups. The ability to return to work and achieve a good-to-excellent long-term result was not significantly different among fracture levels or between surgical and nonsurgical treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The results of nonoperative treatment of low lumbar burst fractures were comparable with those of operative treatment. The rate of repeat surgery (41%) and absence of a clearly definable long-term functional or radiographic benefit in patients without neurologic compromise may make surgery less appealing.     

Short segment pedicle screw instrumentation and augmentation vertebroplasty in lumbar burst fractures: an experience

To assess the efficacy and feasibility of vertebroplasty and posterior short-segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of traumatic lumbar burst fractures. Short-segment pedicle screw instrumentation is a well described technique to reduce and stabilize thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. It is relatively a easy procedure but can only indirectly reduce a fractured vertebral body, and the means of augmenting the anterior column are limited. Hardware failure and a loss of reduction are recognized complications caused by insufficient anterior column support. Patients with traumatic lumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficits were included. After a short segment posterior reduction and fixation, bilateral transpedicular reduction of the endplate was performed using a balloon, and polymethyl methacrylate cement was injected. Pre-operative and post-operative central and anterior heights were assessed with radiographs and MRI. Sixteen patients underwent this procedure, and a substantial reduction of the endplates could be achieved with the technique. All patients recovered uneventfully, and the neurologic examination revealed no deficits. The post-operative radiographs and magnetic resonance images demonstrated a good fracture reduction and filling of the bone defect without unwarranted bone displacement. The central and anterior height of the vertebral body could be restored to 72 and 82% of the estimated intact height, respectively. Complications were cement leakage in three cases without clinical implications and one superficial wound infection. Posterior short-segment pedicle fixation in conjunction with balloon vertebroplasty seems to be a feasible option in the management of lumbar burst fractures, thereby addressing all the three columns through a single approach. Although cement leakage occurred but had no clinical consequences or neurological deficit.     

The significance of thoracolumbar spinal canal size in spinal cord injury patients

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, consecutive case series. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relation between spinal canal dimensions and Injury Severity Score and their association with neurologic sequelae after thoracolumbar junction burst fracture. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a relation in the cervical spine between spinal canal dimension and its association with neurologic sequelae after trauma. A similar relation at the thoracolumbar junction has not been conclusively established. METHODS: Forty-three patients with thoracolumbar junction burst fractures (T12-L2),13 with and 30 without neurologic deficit, were included. Computed tomographic scans were used to measure the sagittal and transverse diameters and the surface area of the spinal canal at the level of injury, as well as one level above and one level below the fracture level. Injury severity score was calculated for both groups. Statistical analysis comparing those with a neurologic deficit to those without was performed by Student's t test. RESULTS: The ratio of sagittal-to-transverse diameter at the level of injury was significantly smaller in patients with a neurologic deficit than in those without a neurologic deficit (P < 0.05). The mean transverse diameter at the level of injury was significantly larger in patients with neurologic deficit than in the neurologically intact patients (P < 0.05). The surface area of the canal at the level below the injury was significantly larger in the patients with a neurologic deficit than in those without a deficit (P < 0.05). Patients with a neurologic deficit had a statistically higher Injury Severity Score when admitted than those without a neurologic deficit (P < 0.0001), although the difference became insignificant after the neurologic component of the scoring system was eliminated. CONCLUSION: There are no anatomic factors at the thoracolumbar junction that predispose to neurologic injury after burst fracture. The shape of the canal after injury, however, as determined by the sagittal-to-transverse diameter ratio, was predictive of neurologic deficit.     

Conservative management of burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra

Isolated fractures of the lumbar fifth vertebrae (L5) are very rare, and there is little information in the literature regarding comparisons between conservative management and surgical treatment of this entity. This retrospective analysis reports on five cases of isolated burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra without neurologic deficit. All cases were managed nonoperatively with a short period of bed rest followed by protected mobilization. The current study reveals that conservative management is appropriate in the cases of burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra with minimal canal compromise, with little deformity, and without neurologic damage.     

Multiple-level thoracolumbar burst fractures in teenaged patients

The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of multiple-level burst fractures in teenaged patients. Five teenaged patients were identified with this injury pattern. The mean age at injury was 17.6 years. All five patients underwent a posterior fusion and an attempted decompression through ligamentotaxis. One of the five went on to have an anterior decompression. Four of the five patients had spinal instrumentation. Neurologic deficit was present in four patients. The proximal fracture was most often responsible for the neurologic deficit when present. The average length of follow-up was 4.5 years. There was no significant neurologic recovery after hospital discharge. Three of the five patients had minimal or no back pain at latest follow-up. The authors conclude that multiple burst fractures should be treated individually based on their clinical and radiographic characteristics.     

Neurological deficit and canal compromise in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures

PURPOSE: To assess whether canal compromise determines neurological deficit in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. METHODS: 105 patients aged 17 to 60 (mean, 34) years who had burst fractures in the thoracolumbar (n=82) and lumbar (n=23) regions were included. Fractures were classified according to the Denis classification. The extent of spinal canal compromise was assessed by computed tomography, and the neurological status according to the modified Frankel grading for traumatic paraplegia. RESULTS: 19 (18%) of the patients had no neurological deficit. Of the remaining 86 (82%) with a deficit, 26 had complete paraplegia. The correlation between the type of the burst fracture and the severity of neurological deficit was not significant (Chi squared=10.57, p=0.835). The mean extent of spinal canal compromise in patients with deficits was 50%, whereas in patients with no deficit it was 36%. The difference between the extent of canal compromise and the severity of neurological deficit at the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine was not significant (p=0.08). Further subanalysis revealed a significant correlation at T11 and T12 (p=0.007) but not at the L1 (p=0.42) level. CONCLUSION: When studying neurological deficit, T11 and T12 injuries should be analysed separately from L1 injuries.     

Does neurological recovery in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures depend on the extent of canal compromise?

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVES: Forty-five consecutive cases of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures treated non-operatively were analyzed to correlate the extent of canal compromise at the time of injury with (i) the initial neurologic deficit and (ii) with the extent of neurological recovery at 1 year. The effect of spinal canal remodeling on neurological recovery was also analyzed. SETTING: University teaching hospital in south India. METHODS: The degree of spinal canal compromise and canal remodeling were assessed from computed tomography scans. The neurologic status was assessed by Frankel's grading. RESULTS: The mean canal compromise in patients with neurologic deficit was 46.2% while in patients with no neurological deficit it was 36.3%. The mean spinal canal compromise in patients with neurological recovery was 46.1% and 48.4% in those with no recovery. The amount of canal remodeling in patients who recovered was 51.7% and 46.1% in the patients who did not recover. None of these differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study shows that there is no correlation between the neurologic deficit and subsequent recovery with the extent of spinal canal compromise in thoracolumbar burst fractures.     

Dural lacerations and thoracolumbar fractures

In the pre-CT era, Miller et al. reported the presence of dural lacerations (DL) and herniations of the cauda equina in a group of patients with thoracolumbar fractures that involved separation of the pedicles, as detailed on plain radiographs. Recently, these injuries have been well characterized on CT scan. We retrospectively reviewed our series of thoracolumbar burst fractures to assess the predictive value of CT for the presence of a DL, and the clinical significance of this finding. Twenty-five patients with 27 levels of injury were assessed. Dural lacerations were noted in eight (32%) of the cases. These were significantly associated with posterior element fractures noted on axial CT, and with motor neurologic deficits. There was no correlation between the presence of a DL and the degree of spinal canal compromise. Dural lacerations occur relatively frequently in patients with thoracolumbar fractures that require operative management. Their presence should be of particular concern in those cases with a motor deficit on presentation and a posterior element fracture on axial CT scan.