Personal use of hormone therapy by postmenopausal women doctors and male doctors' wives in Italy after the publication of WHI trial

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of hormone replacement therapy (HT) use by postmenopausal women doctors and doctors' wives in Italy and to explore the relationship between their personal characteristics and HT use. DESIGN: A total of 500 women doctors and 500 men doctors answering on behalf of their female partners were interviewed by a specialised company in the first months of 2003. Questions were meant to explore medical, behavioural and professional characteristics, personal use of HT, reasons for or against HT use and side effects of HT. The distribution of doctors' specialisation (general practitioners (GPs), gynaecologists, medical oncologists) in the sample interviewed was the same as that of the Italian medical community. RESULTS: Overall, 37% of women doctors and 39% of doctors' wives had ever used HT after menopause, of which 64 and 58%, respectively, were current users. The median duration of HT in the past users was 2.7 years for women doctors and 3.7 for doctors' wives. There were wide differences of HT use according to the type of specialisation: gynaecologists were more willing to use HT (56-59%) than GPs (30-31%) or medical oncologists (16-30%).Vasomotor symptoms (68-69%), followed by the prevention of osteoporosis (28-39%), were the main reasons for commencing HT. The main reasons not to take or to stop HT were the absence or resolution of menopausal symptoms. Only 8% of women doctors and 4% doctors' wives stopped HT after the publication of the WHI data. CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, women doctors/doctors' wives personally use HT much more than postmenopausal general population.     

The woman patient after WHI

An epidemic of fear and distrust has infected women (and physicians) after publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). The overinflated negative data emerging from the oestroprogestinic arm of WHI have frightened women and gave rise to the most difficult emotions to cope with. Keywords such as cancer, death and hormones combined together, have potentiated an avoidant attitude towards hormonal therapy (HT) driven more emotionally than rationally. This negative aura has not been dissipated by the positive data from the oestrogen-only arm of WHI. This paper will discuss: women's different emotional reactions to and coping strategies for HT-related fear after WHI; the communication skills physicians should use in focusing on positive messages emerging from WHI; predictors of current HT use; the meaning of the higher use of HT in postmenopausal highly-educated women and women gynaecologists; the importance of increasing healthy life-styles as a taking of responsibility towards aging by every woman; shifting from passivity to active sharing of the decision making process with the caring physician; and the use of an individually tailored HT, when appropriate, as part of an active strategy in the pursuit of a longer health expectancy.     

Hormone use and patient concerns after the findings of the Women's Health Initiative

OBJECTIVE: To assess behaviors and concerns related to hormone therapy after the findings of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). DESIGN: A survey was mailed to a random sample of 1,200 women identified through the pharmacy database as taking one of two estrogen + progestogen therapies (EPT) during the 6-month period before the publication of WHI findings. Questions included hormone use history, changes in usage, an assessment of symptoms, symptom changes, health behavior changes, use of alternative therapies, and demographics. RESULTS: The response rate was 70%, with women in their 60s and those receiving hormone therapy for 5 or more years were more likely to respond (P < 0.05). The majority had started hormones for symptom relief (69%) and expected to continue use. Many reported discontinuation (63%) or modifying their medication (18%). Half of these women stopped then restarted, the other half changed products. Women in their 50s were more likely to remain on hormones than older women (P < 0.01), and those taking ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate were more likely to remain on their medication than those on conjugated estrogens (43% vs 29%, P < 0.01). Little change was reported in exercise and 19% increased their calcium intake. Patient concerns fell into five major categories: long-term effects, symptom control, breast cancer risk, bone health, and cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: Women seem to be heeding the warnings about hormones but remain concerned about the potential long-term sequelae and symptom control. More research is needed to identify safer approaches to symptom relief and to address the concerns expressed.     

Recent reversal of trends in hormone therapy use in a European population

OBJECTIVE: The impact of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trial results published in July 2002 indicating that hormone therapy (HT) is potentially harmful for the heart and the mammary gland of naturally postmenopausal women was assessed for the first time in a European population. DESIGN: This study continuously monitored HT use from 1994 through 2003 in a population-based random sample of 5,758 women aged 35 to 74 years residing in Geneva (city and canton), Switzerland, yielding 1,938 naturally postmenopausal women with an intact uterus and 206 artificially postmenopausal women. Women in the former subgroup weighed substantially less than their WHI trial counterparts but were not otherwise at lower risk for cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: Among the naturally postmenopausal women with an intact uterus, current HT use increased from 29% to 46% (P < 0.0001) through July 2002 and then decreased abruptly to 31% in 2003. Current HT use remained stable (range, 38%-46%; trend P = 0.92) among the artificially postmenopausal women. CONCLUSIONS: Successive annual increases from 1994 through 2001 in the prevalence of current HT use by postmenopausal women living in Geneva were dramatically reversed to the level in 1994 just after the results of the WHI trial were published, but only for naturally postmenopausal women with an intact uterus. Approximately one in three of the latter women who stopped using HT may also have lost its beneficial effects on bone health.     

The impact of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial 2002 on perceived risk communication and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy in Germany

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this representative, nationwide telephone survey was to collect information about postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) use in relation to women's knowledge about the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial 2002 (WHI-RCT) in Germany. DESIGN: During July 2003, telephone interviews were conducted with randomly selected women aged 45 to 60 years (N = 10,030; response 59.9%; completed interviews n = 6,007). They were asked about information sources regarding the WHI-RCT, and use of HT in conjunction with it. RESULTS: Most women stated that they knew about the WHI-RCT (88.6%), and those with high educational status appeared to have more information than those with middle or low educational status. Among informed women (uninformed excluded), 46.6% continued, 25.7% stopped, and 14.2% ceased use of HT before the WHI-RCT. The prevalence of lifetime use of HT was higher in West Germany (37.4%) than in East Germany (29.2%), the highest prevalence of use was in the group aged 55 to 59 years. The most common reason to continue HT was the benefit risk assessment by physicians (58%); the most common reason to stop HT were women's perceptions that the risks of HT exceeded the benefits (56%). If information was solely given by physicians, women were more likely to continue HT (60.4%), compared with mass media (46.1%), as a source of information. CONCLUSIONS: The survey demonstrates the impact of the WHI-RCT in Germany, and shows that both the media and advice given by physicians were important. Women who continued to use HT did so largely because of their physician's advice. Women who discontinued were mainly those who had a negative subjective perception about risk of HT.     

Prevalence and correlates of hormonal therapy among Israeli women in the post-WHI era

OBJECTIVES: Following the results of recent randomized controlled trials on the risks and benefits of the long-term use of hormonal therapy (HT), practice guidelines regarding HT use have been revised. The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence and the correlates of HT use in Israel in 2003. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study, conducted on a representative sample of the general population in Israel aged 21 years and over. The study questionnaire is based on the European Health Interview Survey (EUROHIS) project, aimed to develop uniform study tools, to enable international comparisons. The current module of the survey focused on women's health, and telephone interviews were conducted with 1396 women by trained interviewers in the year 2003. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1396 participants, 535 were defined as peri- or postmenopausal (38%). Of them, 9.9% were currently using HT (11.7% and 2.9% among the Jewish and Arab participants, respectively), and their mean age (S.D.) was 57.7 (6.5) years. Mean duration of HT use was 8.0 (5.5) years. Treatment of menopausal symptoms was the most common reason for HT use (69.2%). Significant correlates of HT use were age, being secular and having seen a gynecologist in the previous 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Current HT use rates reported are lower than those reported 3 years ago for Israeli women. Awareness of both physicians and patients to the WHI results (2002), may have accounted for this trend, at least partially.     

New evidence regarding hormone replacement therapies is urgently required transdermal postmenopausal hormone therapy differs from oral hormone therapy in risks and benefits

Controversies about the safety of different postmenopausal hormone therapies (HTs) started 30 years ago and reached a peak in 2003 after the publication of the results from the Women Health Initiative (WHI) trial and the Million Women Study (MWS) [Writing group for the women's health initiative investigations. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. JAMA 2002;288:321-33; Million women study collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet 2003;362:419-27]. The single HT formulation used in the WHI trial for non hysterectomized women-an association of oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE-0.625 mg/day) and a synthetic progestin, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA-2.5 mg/day)-increases the risks of venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular disease, stroke and breast cancer. The MWS, an observational study, showed an increased breast cancer risk in users of estrogens combined with either medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), norethisterone, or norgestrel. It is unclear and questionable to what extent these results might be extrapolated to other HRT regimens, that differ in their doses, compositions and administration routes, and that were not assessed in the WHI trial and the MWS. Significant results were achieved with the publication of the WHI estrogen-only arm study [Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:1701-1712] in which hormone therapy was reserved to women who had carried out hysterectomy. What emerged from this study will allow us to have some important argument to develop.     

Long term use of benzodiazepines: the views of patients.

All long term benzodiazepine users in one inner London general practice were asked to participate in a study of their attitudes to their drugs. The 64 respondents had mixed views about benzodiazepines and did not conform to the stereotype presented in the media. Although 58% of the sample had attempted to stop taking benzodiazepines, this was usually not until at least one year of taking the drug. At the time of interview, 50% of the sample expressed a desire to stop taking their tablets. However, the majority were uncertain whether their general practitioner wished them to continue taking the drugs or not. It is argued that users' views of their medication must be taken into account in the debate about tranquillizer dependence.     

Women's awareness and knowledge of hormone therapy post-Women's Health Initiative

OBJECTIVE: Findings from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) failed to confirm previous expectations about the net benefits of menopausal hormone therapy and have resulted in reduced use of these medications. The aim of this study was to evaluate women's awareness and knowledge concerning the risks and benefits of hormone therapy. DESIGN: A nationally representative survey was completed for a sample of 781 women (ages 40-60 y, mean 49 y) drawn from the Knowledge Networks Internet panel 24 months after publication of the first WHI findings, in June 2004. Responses were weighted to reflect the demographics of the US population. The main outcome measures were awareness of WHI and knowledge of its findings. An aggregate score was constructed to assess women's knowledge of the impact of hormone therapy on seven key disease outcomes. Logistic regression determined the independent predictors of (1) WHI awareness and (2) a positive aggregate knowledge score, reflecting appropriate responses about risks and benefits. RESULTS: Only 29% of women were aware of the WHI results. Only 40% of women had a positive aggregate knowledge score. Aside from awareness of WHI and independent of other factors, knowledge scores were lower for African American women (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.6) and among women with less education (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.9). Knowledge was greatest for breast cancer and osteoporosis outcomes and most limited for colorectal cancer and memory loss. CONCLUSION: Surveyed women had limited awareness and knowledge of the WHI results, suggesting limited diffusion. Targeting younger, less educated, and African American women is warranted.     

The Women’s Health Initiative Conundrum

Summary The WHI has been designed to evaluate the metabolic risks and benefits of Estrogen/Progestagen Therapy (HT) or Estrogen Therapy (ET) in women in their later postmenopause. It has not been designed to study the effect of HT or ET on symptomatic peri- and early postmenopausal women. Furthermore, the selection criteria used in the WHI are not congruent with the profiles of women treated in daily medicine by HT/ET: women starting HT/ET in clinical routine are younger, less obese and healthier than the WHI population. Therefore, the results and the risk-benefit-conclusions of the WHI cannot be applied to normal symptomatic peri- and immediately postmenopausal women, and even less to women with early (40–50 years) or premature (40yrs.) menopause.     

When is it appropriate to prescribe postmenopausal hormone therapy?

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence and consensus-based recommendations for the use of hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: Using evidence from clinical trials and other publications, a multidisciplinary group of women's health experts developed consensus-based recommendations for HT use in more than 300 clinical scenarios. These panelists utilized the RAND Appropriateness Method and a quantitative scale to rate the appropriateness of treatment options for women with various risk factors and clinical scenarios. RESULTS: The panel judged it appropriate to prescribe all forms of HT to women with intolerable menopause symptoms and usual (age-expected) risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD), venous thromboembolism (VTE), or stroke. Use of HT was judged not appropriate for the clinical scenarios of bone preservation, cosmetic appearance, current memory loss, loss of libido, or CVD protection. For a woman still using HT after 5 or more years, it was considered appropriate to recommend the options of stopping or lowering the dose even if stopping was previously attempted. In treating intolerable symptoms in the presence of some elevated risk for diseases related to HT, route of administration may affect appropriateness but prior stroke or TIA# is a contraindication. CONCLUSIONS: Standard HT is appropriate for women with intolerable menopause symptoms in the absence of HT-related risk factors (eg, CVD, stroke, VTE, breast cancer). Panelists judged it appropriate to repeatedly present the option of stopping or reducing the dose. In most cases, presence of risk factors makes standard-dose oral HT not appropriate; however, some women may be candidates for a different dose or route of administration.     

Menopausal symptoms after cessation of hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of recurrent menopausal symptoms among post-menopausal women who discontinued hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after the publication of the women's health initiative (WHI) study and to describe the therapeutic strategies employed to address these symptoms. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1000 post-menopausal women seen consecutively at an internal medicine practice from January 2004 to May 2004. RESULTS: Among 1000 post-menopausal women, 205 (21%) had discontinued HRT due to the WHI results. Menopausal symptoms were present in 91/205 (44%) women, with 52/205 (25%) having vasomotor symptoms, 51/205 (25%) urogenital complaints, and 10/205 (5%) mood-related symptoms. Out of the 91 symptomatic women, only 55 (60%) received therapy to relieve their symptoms. The most commonly employed treatments were topical estrogen in 33/91 (36%) women, complementary therapies in 18/91 (20%) women, and venlafaxine in 13/91 (14%) women. Among complementary therapies, the most frequent were black cohosh used by 8/91 (9%) women and soy by 7/91 (8%) women. CONCLUSIONS: Many post-menopausal women developed typical menopausal symptoms after discontinuation of HRT, with vasomotor and urogenital complaints being the most commonly reported. Topical estrogen, complementary therapies, and venlafaxine were the most usual treatments for menopausal symptoms. However, a large number of symptomatic women remained untreated.