Nerve-Sparing Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Metastatic Testicular Cancer

Background :
Nerve-sparing techniques are used during retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with early stage testicular cancer to preserve postoperative ejaculatory function. Indications for the procedures have been extended to patients with a postchemotherapy retroperitoneal residual mass without compromising the efficacy of surgery. We report 6 cases diagnosed with metastatic testicular cancer who underwent nerve-sparing RPLND.
Methods :
Between January 1994 and March 1996, 6 patients with metastatic testicular cancer underwent nerve-sparing RPLND. Five of these patients received primary chemotherapy and had a retroperitoneal residual mass. Four patients underwent complete bilateral RPLND and 2 underwent unilateral template surgery.
Results :
After a mean follow-up of 18.7 months (range, 8 to 34), there have been no local recurrences and 5 (83%) patients report antegrade ejaculation.
Conclusion :
Nerve-sparing RPLND is applicable for selected patients with metastatic testicular cancer without increasing the risk of local recurrence. Ejaculatory function is preserved in the majority of patients, contributing to the improvement of the quality of life in men who require such surgery.     

Penile and Testicular Cancer: What's New in 2006?

ObjectivesThis paper communicates the most relevant new findings on penile and testicular cancer that were presented at the European Association of Urology (EAU), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2006 annual meetings.MethodsData were selected by urologic experts in the field of penile and testicular cancer, and discussed during a closed meeting in September 2006. Selection of data was based on expert experience.ResultsProgress is being made with respect to penile-preserving surgery in not only T1 but also T2–4 patients and in the selection of patients suitable for inguinal lymph node dissection (LND). The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to LND in N2–3 penile cancer is getting more established. An important contribution on testicular cancer suggested that the actual role of retroperitoneal LND (RPLND) in stage I non–seminoma germ cell tumour (NSGCT) is becoming marginal compared with chemotherapy. The major conclusion on postchemotherapy residual testicular masses was that a modified nerve-sparing postchemotherapy RPLND is appropriate for many patients with stage II NSGCT but that a full bilateral postchemotherapy RPNLD is mandatory in patients with metastatic NSGCT. Other data showed that patients with a postchemotherapy nodal size >5 cm, clinical stage III, and absence of a full postchemotherapy RPLND are at higher risk of relapse following postchemotherapy RPLND and should be closely followed.ConclusionsDespite the rarity of penile and testicular cancer, progress is being made in treatment strategies and risk factors.     

Clinical parameters that predict histology of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node mass in testicular cancer

BACKGROUND: Since the advent of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the majority of metastatic testicular cancers can be cured by chemotherapy followed by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). However, postchemotherapy RPLND confers no therapeutic benefit if the residual mass contains no viable cells. Therefore, to determine which parameters predict a patient's likelihood of having only necrosis in the residual mass, we retrospectively analyzed clinical parameters of patients who underwent postchemotherapy RPLND. METHODS: Data from 27 patients with metastatic testicular cancer were analyzed. The histology of the primary tumor was seminoma in 11 cases and non-seminoma in 16 cases. All of the patients with non-seminoma showed a normalization of tumor markers after chemotherapy. Analysis of clinical parameters included data for the initial histology, pretreatment tumor marker levels, postchemotherapy retroperitoneal mass size, and the histology of the dissected RPLNs. RESULTS: Histological examination of dissected RPLNs showed residual tumor in 27% of seminoma patients and 38% of non-seminoma patients. In seminoma patients, no viable cells were found in all six patients with pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels below 7.5 times the upper limit of normal, or in all five of the patients with postchemotherapy RPLNs less than 2.5 cm. In non-seminoma patients, no viable cells were found in nine of 10 patients with pretreatment alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels less than 2700 ng/mL, or in eight of nine patients with residual mass less than 2.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Both postchemotherapy RPLN mass size and pretreatment tumor marker levels are possible predictors for necrosis of the residual mass in testicular cancer patients.     

Post-chemotherapy nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for advanced germ cell tumor

Objective:   To report our experience with post-chemotherapy nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for advanced germ cell tumor (GCT).
Methods:   Between 1994 and 2008, 92 patients with advanced GCT underwent RPLND after multiple treatments with systemic chemotherapy at our institution. A nerve-sparing RPLND was carried out in 78 patients (84.8%; median age 32 years). Of them, 19 had a seminoma and 59 had a non-seminoma.
Results:   Lumbar splanchnic nerves controlling ejaculatory function were macroscopically preserved during RPLND. Bilateral and unilateral lumbar splanchnic nerves were preserved in 40 patients and 38 patients, respectively. Sixty-five patients could be evaluated for ejaculation. Fifty-four patients (83.1%) achieved antegrade ejaculation with a median postoperative interval of 3 months (range: 1–10 months). Twenty-eight patients (28/30: 93.3%) and 26 patients (26/35: 74.3%) undergoing bilateral and unilateral nerve-sparing RPLND had antegrade ejaculation, respectively ( P  = 0.041). Only two patients (2.6%) had mediastinal and retroperitoneal recurrences during a median follow-up of 42 months (range: 1–138 months), respectively. However, these patients were cured by chemotherapy and surgery.
Conclusions:   Post-chemotherapy nerve-sparing RPLND preserves ejaculatory function in the majority of patients with advanced GCT without increasing the risk of local recurrence.     

Retrospective review of the outcome of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the management of metastatic testicular cancer: Local experience

Objective: Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for metastatic testicular cancer is an uncommon surgical procedure in Hong Kong. Therefore, in the present article, we review the perioperative and long-term morbidity, as well as the survival outcome for RPLND carried out in a urological centre. Method: This is a retrospective study of patients suffering from metastatic testicular cancer with post-chemotherapy residual mass subjected to RPLND between 1998 and 2008. Patient and tumour parameters including initial presentation, chemotherapy regimens received prior to RPLND, perioperative outcomes, pathology and long-term results were retrieved from hospital notes and reviewed. Results: Seven patients who underwent post-chemotherapy RPLND were included in the present review. The mean follow-up time was 63.7 months (range 6–136 months), and no recurrence or mortality was reported in this series. Early perioperative morbidity included pulmonary oedema (one), chylous ascites (one) and wound dehiscence (one). Other than ejaculatory dysfunction in all of the patients, there was no major-long term complication reported in our series. Conclusion: This local series confirmed the survival benefit and association of minimal long-term morbidity with post-chemotherapy RPLND.     

Current controversies on the role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an important component of the multimodal treatment which cures most patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors. Considering the high cure rates achieved, research focus in recent years has been directed toward improving quality of life and decreasing long-term treatment related sequelae. Consequently, the role of RPLND has evolved over the past 3 decades in both low-stage and advanced testicular cancer.The use of RPLND in clinically stage I and low volume stage II disease may offer the advantages of treating retroperitoneal teratoma which is present in 15% to 20% of patients, avoiding chemotherapy and reducing the need for frequent imaging during follow-up. Similarly, ongoing studies are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of RPLND for the treatment of early stage seminoma to avoid the long-term effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RPLND is traditionally used for the treatment of residual masses >1 cm after completion of chemotherapy. Its role in subcentimeter residual masses remains somewhat controversial given the fact that 25% to 30% of these patients are found to harbor either teratoma or viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumors. The presence of teratoma increases the probability of teratoma in metastatic sites.Modified unilateral templates were developed based on early mapping studies with the aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation. Recent data suggests initial mapping studies underestimated the risk of contralateral retroperitoneal metastases which may reach 32%. Furthermore, antegrade ejaculation may be preserved in >95% of patients undergoing bilateral nerve sparing primary RPLND and >80% undergoing nerve-sparing PC-RPLND, which, in our view is the more prudent oncologic approach.Recently, multiple series have demonstrated the safety and short-term efficacy of minimally invasive RPLND; however, larger studies with prolonged follow-up are required to validate the long-term oncologic efficacy of newer techniques.     

Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal surgery remains necessary in patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer and minimal residual tumor masses: Oldenburg J,Alfsen GC,Lien HH,Aass N,Waehre H,Fossa SD,Department of Medical Oncology,The Norwegian Radium Hospital,Montebello, Oslo,Norway.

J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3310–7PurposeTo determine preoperative parameters that predict the histology of specimens obtained by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell cancer (NSGCT) whose residual mass was ≤20 mm in diameter after modern cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy.Patients and methodsEighty-seven patients with metastatic NSGCT underwent RPLND after having received cisplatin- or carboplatin-based induction chemotherapy. In all patients, the largest diameter of the residual mass on the transaxial plane was ≤20 mm, as assessed by abdominal computed tomography (CT) immediately before RPLND.ResultsComplete fibrosis or necrosis was found in 58 patients (67%), teratoma was found in 23 patients (26%), and vital malignant germ cell tumor was found in six patients (7%), including one patient with rhabdomyosarcoma in the RPLND specimen. In five of the six latter patients, the residual lesion was ≤10 mm at pre-RPLND CT. No pre- or postchemotherapy clinical or radiologic parameter was identified that significantly predicted the histology of the residual mass.ConclusionOne-third of retroperitoneal postchemotherapy lesions ≤20 mm contained residual vital tumor tissue, despite modern chemotherapy regimens. Therefore, postchemotherapy RPLND remains necessary in patients with minimal-size residual lesions to facilitate easy and safe follow-up and initiate additional therapy as early as possible, thus avoiding recurrences.     

Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in advanced germ cell tumours of the testis

OBJECTIVES: To review the role of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in patients with advanced testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) with special attention towards the indication, surgical technique, and oncological outcome. METHODS: A structured review of the literature until May 2007 using the PubMed database was performed. RESULTS: According to current guidelines and recommendations, PC-RPLND in advanced seminomas with residual tumours is indicated only if a PET scan performed 6-8 wk after chemotherapy is positive. In nonseminomatous TGCT, PC-RPLND is indicated for all residual radiographic lesions with negative or plateauing markers. Loss of antegrade ejaculation represents the most common long-term complication, which can be prevented by a nerve-sparing or modified template resection. The relapse rate after PC-RPLND is around 12%; however, it increases significantly to about 45% in cases with redo RPLND and late relapses. Patients with increasing markers should undergo salvage chemotherapy. Only select patients with elevated markers who are thought to be chemorefractory might undergo desperation PC-RPLND if all radiographically visible lesions are completely resectable. CONCLUSION: PC-RPLND represents a major part of the management of advanced TGCT undergoing inductive chemotherapy. Complete resection of all residual masses after primary chemotherapy results in a long-term disease-free survival of 95%. PC-RPLND requires a complex surgical approach and should be performed in experienced, tertiary referral centres only.     

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with low stage testicular cancer with embryonal carcinoma predominance and/or lymphovascular invasion

PURPOSE: The outcome after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) was analyzed in patients with clinical stage I-IIA nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer with embryonal carcinoma predominance (ECP) or lymphovascular invasion (LVI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 2002, 267 patients with clinical stage I-IIA nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer, and ECP and/or LVI underwent RPLND. Patient information was obtained from a prospective database. Median followup was 53 months. RESULTS: Overall 42% of patients had pathological stage (PS) II disease, of whom 54% had low volume (PN1) disease and 16% had retroperitoneal teratoma. The 5-year progression-free probability was 90% overall, 90% for PS I and 86% for PN1. All patients with relapse were continuously free of disease following standard chemotherapy with or without resection of residual masses and the 10-year actuarial overall survival was 100%. When adjuvant chemotherapy was restricted to patients with PN2 disease, the estimated 5-year relapse rate was 9% and an estimated 72% of patients avoided chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The low risk of systemic relapse in patients with PS I and PN1 after RPLND alone combined with the 16% incidence of retroperitoneal teratoma and the favorable morbidity profile supports RPLND over primary chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with low stage disease with ECP and/or LVI who are not candidates for surveillance. An estimated 72% of patients are spared the potential toxicity of chemotherapy if adjuvant therapy is restricted to patients with PN2. After primary RPLND and selective adjuvant chemotherapy late recurrence is distinctly uncommon and long-term cancer control is anticipated in essentially all patients.     

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection as Adjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of Non-Seminomatous Testicular Cancer

Objective: To assess the results of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) of residual masses in patients with disseminated non-seminomatous germ cell tumour treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, both in terms of extension of surgery, morbidity and survival.

Patients and methods: Retrospectively, all patients treated for non-seminomatous germ cell tumour at the University Hospital of Antwerp were studied from January 1987 till December 1997.

In patients with non-seminomatous testicular cancer more than stage I, the ‘wait and see’ strategy changed and patients were treated with chemotherapy. Patients were assessed at the end of chemotherapy and if a residual masses persisted, a RPLND was performed. If possible, a nerve-sparing lymphadenectomy was performed. Extension of surgery, morbidity and survival were analysed.

Results: Sixty patients had a non-seminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis and were analysed. The median follow-up was 78 months (range: 13-144 months).

Thirteen patients with stage I disease were treated with orchiectomy only and none of these patients had recurrent disease. Forty-seven patients were treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A complete response was observed in sixteen patients (34%), while 31 patients (66%) achieved a partial response and were treated with a RPLND. Fifteen patients underwent RPLND above the level of the renal trunk. In two patients malignant cells or fibrotic tissue were found above the renal trunk and bilateral. In five patients viable tumour cells were found in the region below the renal trunk.

Sixteen patients underwent RPLND below the level of the renal trunk, of which nine had a unilateral resection, containing viable tumour in two patients.

Operative mortality was 0%. One patient died six months after RPLND due to metastatic disease. In two patients, an important retroperitoneal bleeding occurred. Resection of adherent organs was performed in two patients. Long term sexual problems were reported by thirteen patients (65%) with bilateral lymphadenectomy versus two patients (18%) in the unilateral group.

The survival of the patients treated with a RPLND was 97% and in the whole group of patients with a non-seminoma-tous testicular cancer 98%.

Conclusion: RPLND has a place in the treatment of patients with non-seminomatous testicular cancer after chemotherapy in case of residual masses. Although mortality is low, morbidity is acceptable. In a limited number of patients there was a need of resection of adherent organs when a resection above the renal trunk was performed.     

Fertility considerations in nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection

Summary Nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) maintains the patient's ability to ejaculate postoperatively. However, since testicular cancer patients sometimes have diminished spermatogenesis, questions have been raised as to the advisability of nerve preservation relative to ultimate fertility. Fertility status was assessed in clinical stage A patients by two methods. These included standard semen analysis and a post-RPLND survey. The results show that approximately 75% of nonseminomatous testicular cancer patients who present in clinical stage A have fertility potential as based on semen analysis. Additionally, of those patients responding to the post-RPLND survey who had attempted pregnancy following RPLND, 76% reported attainment of pregnancy. Nerve-sparing RPLND maintains fertility potential in clinical stage I patients; furthermore, this fertility potential appears to be worth preserving as many patients will be capable of impregnating their partners.     

Nerve sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy with intraoperative electrostimulation in patients with nonseminomatous testicular tumors]

Thirteen patients with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumours underwent nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RLA) with prospective isolation and preservation of postganglionic sympathetic nerve fibres. In all ten patients with pathological stage I in whom a unilateral nerve-sparing RLA was performed, ejaculation was preserved. In two of three patients with pathological stage IIa who underwent a bilateral RLA with a nerve-sparing technique on one side, ejaculation was also preserved. In nine patients intraoperative electrostimulation of isolated sympathetic nerve fibres was performed employing Brindley's stimulation device. The result was an immediate and reproducible ejaculation in seven patients. Thus electrostimulation of sympathetic nerves may be a useful intraoperative test for the identification of the nerve fibres that need to be protected for ejaculation. Nerve-sparing RLA seems to be superior to modified (unilateral) RLA with regard to preservation of ejaculation.     

Repeat retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in advanced testicular cancer

OBJECTIVES: Repeat retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for the treatment of metastatic testicular cancer is an uncommonly performed procedure. We evaluated the location, pathohistological results, postoperative complications and therapeutic outcome in 17 patients being referred for repeat RPLND after failure of the primary retroperitoneal approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 18 patients underwent repeat RPLND after failed primary RPLND or residual tumour resection. We retrospectively analyzed preoperative patient characteristics, operative and pathohistological data from primary and repeat RPLND, morbidity and oncological outcome after surgery. RESULTS: All patients had nonseminomatous primaries with metastatic retroperitoneal lymph nodes; 4 and 14 patients had undergone primary RPLND and residual tumor resection (RTR), respectively, for metastatic testicular cancer. Prior to repeat RPLND all patients had undergone 4 cycles of salvage chemotherapy for locoregional recurrences only with negative tumour markers at time of surgery. All patients demonstrated residual masses requiring repeat RPLND. Retroperitoneal recurrences were located at multiple sites: retrocaval area with infiltration of the vena cava, interaortocaval and paraaortic region, retrocrural space, suprahilar region, outfield metastases in the iliac region. Two cases required resection of the vena cava due to infiltration, in one case an aortic graft and an iliac graft was necessary due to tumour infiltration of the adventitial layer of the vessels; nephrectomy and resection of the sigmoid was required in another 2 patients. The most significant complication was chylous ascites 1 and prolonged paralytic ileus in 1 patient. Pathohistological examination of the resected specimen revealed viable germ cell tumour elements in 4 patients (22.2%), necrosis/fibrosis in 8 patients (44.4%) and mature teratoma in 6 patients (33.3%). At a mean follow-up of 22 (1-45) months, the disease specific survival rate was 89% with significant differences between patients with necrosis (100%), mature teratoma (85%) and viable cancer (50%). CONCLUSION: Recurrences after RPLND usually reflect inadequate primary surgery especially in the retrocaval and suprahilar region. Repeat RPLND is safe and effective in the majority of patients; however, it requires careful preoperative planning with regard to potential involvement of adjacent vascular and visceral structures making close interdisciplinary collaboration necessary in many cases. Repeat RPLND is a mandatory surgery to be performed at centres of expertise.     

Evolution and controversies in the management of low-stage nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors of the testis

Summary The results of changing treatment modalities in 690 consecutive patients with low stages nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT) of the testis were analyzed. Overall, 120 patients (17.4%) suffered relapses, and 25 (3.6%) died of cancer after a follow-up period ranging from 2 to 20 years. The indications for primary (nerve-sparing) retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) were gradually restricted from clinical stages I, IIA, and IIB to stages I and IIA with normal postorchiectomy markers only, but we recognize that the management of clinical stage I NSGCT of the testis remains controversial. All other patients may be treated with primary chemotherapy followed by nerve-sparing RPLND for any residual mass. Adjuvant chemotherapy is mandatory in pathological stage IIC disease, but this pathological category will disappear with adoption of the restrictions for primary nerve-sparing RPLND, and two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy are adequate treatment for patients with pathological stages IIA and IIB disease, who cannot be carefully followed.     

Surveillance of postchemotherapy subcentimeter residual retroperitoneal mass in metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: Does how you measure matter?

BackgroundApproximately 70% to 80% of patients with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy achieve a complete response, defined as normalization of serum tumor markers and either no residual retroperitoneal mass (RRM) or an RRM <1.0 cm. While there is universal agreement that patients with an RRM ≥1.0 cm should undergo retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), many institutions including ours recommend surveillance for patients who achieve a complete response. However, studies have not defined which axis of the RRM should be considered when deciding between surveillance and RPLND.Patients and MethodsGood-risk metastatic NSGCT patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy who achieved a complete response and underwent surveillance were identified using our institution's electronic medical records. A post-hoc review was performed by a blinded radiologist. The RRM dimensions in the transaxial short axis (TSA), transaxial long axis (TLA), and craniocaudal axis (CCA) were recorded. Differences in the frequency of recurrence between groups with an RRM <1.0 cm and ≥1.0 cm in the TLA and CCA were assessed using the Fisher exact test.ResultsThirty-nine patients who met study criteria were included. At a median follow-up of 63.8 months, 2 patients (5.1%) recurred. Both were successfully treated with salvage chemotherapy and RPLND. Thirteen (33%) and 27 (69%) patients had an RRM ≥1.0 cm in the TLA and CCA, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the risk of recurrence between patients with an RRM <1.0 cm and ≥1.0 cm in the TLA (P = 0.54) or CCA (P = 0.53).ConclusionsSurveillance is an effective strategy in good-risk NSGCT patients with a postchemotherapy RRM <1.0 cm in the TSA. Our study suggests referencing the TSA and not the TLA or CCA may avoid unnecessary postchemotherapy RPLNDs.     

Two cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy for low-volume retroperitoneal stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumours

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the oncological efficacy of reducing cisplatin-based chemotherapy to two cycles in patients with low-volume retroperitoneal stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1988 until January 2004, two cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy were administered in 59 patients with low-volume retroperitoneal clinical stage II NSGCT (retroperitoneal mass of <5 cm in diameter). Regardless of remission detected on computed tomography, 6 weeks after chemotherapy the patients had a retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) to assess residual active tumour or mature teratoma (open modified bilateral RPLND until 1992, then laparoscopic unilateral template RPLND). RESULTS: The chemotherapy was effective, as no active tumour was found in any of RPLND specimens. Mature teratoma was present in lymphatic tissue in 23 of 59 patients (39%). In one patient there was a pulmonary recurrence, successfully treated with cisplatin-based salvage chemotherapy. One patient died from an accident but with no evidence of tumour, and 56 patients remained free of disease at a mean follow-up of 98.6 months. No patient died from disease. All patients had antegrade ejaculation after laparoscopic RPLND, as did 89% after open RPLND. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, the oncological efficacy of two cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy was favourable, but this approach still cannot be recommended as a standard treatment for patients with low-volume retroperitoneal stage II disease. RPLND after chemotherapy has diagnostic (detecting active tumour) and therapeutic (removing mature teratoma) value and can be done laparoscopically. Based on the present results a prospective randomized trial seems reasonable.     

Electrostimulation of sympathetic nerve fibers during nerve-sparing laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular tumor

A long-handled pair of electrodes with sufficient length to allow stimulation during laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) was designed at our institute. We clinically utilized this electrode in the treatment of a 37-year-old patient with testicular tumor who underwent right orchidectomy and nerve-sparing laparoscopic RPLND. During laparoscopic RPLND, sympathetic nerve fibers relevant to ejaculation were electrically stimulated and changes in pressure at the bladder neck were observed. Nerve preservation was confirmed by increased pressure at the bladder neck and ejaculation immediately after the electrostimulation. The application of laparoscopic electrostimulation may become widespread, particularly since it meets the increasing demand for minimally invasive surgery.     

Critical Evaluation of Modified Templates and Current Trends in Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is a critical aspect of staging and treatment of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) of the testis. RPLND achieves cure in a majority of patients with low-volume metastatic disease and minimizes the need for chemotherapy. Initial surgical approaches to RPLND, involving wide limits to dissection, were associated with high rates of retrograde ejaculation and significant overall morbidity. Evolving modified RPLND templates helped reduce rates of retrograde ejaculation but may be associated with a 3 %–23 % risk of unresected metastasis. Modified templates have become a standard of care in primary RPLND with low-volume metastatic disease. Only highly select patients at specialized centers should undergo modified template RPLND in the postchemotherapy setting, because risks of unresected disease are higher than in the primary setting. Bilateral RPLND optimizes cancer control and can preserve antegrade ejaculation if nerve sparing is performed. We also briefly discuss minimally invasive approaches to RPLND.     

RPLND or primary chemotherapy in clinical stage IIA/B nonseminomatous germ cell tumors? Results of a prospective multicenter trial including quality of life assessment

BACKGROUND: In order to reduce therapy-related morbidity in patients with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors in clinical stage IIA/B, we performed a prospective multicenter trial comparing the standard retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) +2 cycles of chemotherapy (arm A) with 3-4 cycles of primary chemotherapy (arm B). METHODS: From February 1991 to July 1995, 57 participating centers from Germany and Austria recruited 187 evaluable patients. 109 received primary RPLND and 78 primary chemotherapy. Two different chemotherapies were applied (PEB and CEB as adjuvant or inductive treatment). The quality of life (QoL), therapy-related morbidity, suspected predictive factors (histology and size of metastases), and outcome were assessed. RESULTS: In arm A, 12% had pathological stage (PS) I, 70% PS II A/B, and 18% PS II C/III. In arm B, 67% achieved complete remission with chemotherapy alone, 33% required a secondary RPLND. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 7% of the patients in arm A and 11% in arm B had relapsed. Two patients died due to complications of chemotherapy. Surgical complications amounted to 12% in arm A and 27% of 26 postchemotherapy RPLNDs (9% in arm B). Loss of ejaculation occurred in 32% in arm A, and 16% in arm B. Acute toxicity of chemotherapy was higher in the group receiving primary chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We recommend primary RPLND because adjuvant chemotherapy can be spared in PS I, two cycles of chemotherapy are less toxic than 3 or 4 cycles, the primary operation is associated with less complications than that following chemotherapy and, with modern surgical procedures, ejaculation can be preserved in most of the patients, provided that the operation is carried out by an experienced surgeon. No statistically significant differences in the QoL outcome occurred between the treatment groups, suggesting that chemotherapy alone is not superior to primary or secondary RPLND in this respect.     

Consequences of Missed Nodes during Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection and How to Avoid Them

ContextToday, the role of urologic surgery in the management of nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) of the testis is limited to orchiectomy and post-chemotherapy surgery for residual disease. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in low stage disease is considered an optional staging procedure and templates have been introduced to avoid the risk of postoperative loss of antegrade ejaculation. Furthermore, patients with positive nodes are given adjuvant chemotherapy.ObjectiveTo determine how best to develop templates that help surgeons to avoid missed nodes at RPLND maintaining antegrade ejaculation.Evidence acquisitionOnly through a thorough understanding of the lymphatic drainage of the testis can we hope to avoid missed nodes during RPLND. This paper looks at the history of research in this area of functional anatomy as well as at the current work on the management of RPLN metastases in nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT).Evidence synthesisTemplates that have been constructed to guide open or laparoscopic RPLND are fit for nerve sparing but are not able to avoid occasional missed nodes at RPLND. Critical evaluation of current templates suggests to extent RPLND templates to further zones. The consequence is that more extended templates can compromise antegrade ejaculation, which can be secured by prospective nerve sparing technique. Furthermore, RPLND alone will cure 70% of pathological stage IIA patients.ConclusionsLanding zones for retroperitoneal lymph node metastases are too scattered to design a restricted template that will allow both radical RPLND and an easy nerve-sparing technique to maintain antegrade ejaculation. We also have to bear in mind that chemotherapy is not a panacea for missed or recurrent nodal metastases: radical surgery does have curative potential and prospective nerve-sparing is safer than templates.