Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have suggested that ultrasound (US) guidance during embryo transfer might improve pregnancy rates. METHODS: A prospective randomized (computer-generated random table) trial was performed to compare embryo transfer under abdominal US guidance (n = 255 women) with clinical touch embryo transfer (n = 260). RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate was 26.3% (67/255) in the US-guided transfer group compared with 18.1% (47/260) in the clinical touch transfer group (P < 0.05). The implantation rate was 11.1% (100/903) in the US group compared with 7.5% (66/884) in the clinical touch group (P < 0.05). US-guided transfer was associated with a decrease in the difficulty of the transfers: 97% of transfers were easy in the US-guided group compared with 81% in the clinical touch group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: US-guided embryo transfer increased pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF cycles, as well as the frequency of easy transfers. It is suggested that the decrease in cervical and uterine trauma can play a role in the increase in pregnancy rates associated with US-guided transfer. It is recommended that embryo transfer should be performed under US guidance.     

Embryo transfer: ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch.

In this prospective control study, the pregnancy and implantation rates were compared between ultrasound-guided and clinical touch uterine embryo transfers. In addition, a subset of patients was sought that would particularly benefit from embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance. A total of 187 patients (93 ultrasound and 94 clinical touch) was enrolled. Allocation was random and depended on whether their embryo transfers were done during the 1 h each day in which the ultrasound was available. Pregnancy and implantation rates of 37.8 and 20.4% respectively were achieved when ultrasound was used, compared with 28.9 and 16.2% respectively with clinical touch. This difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the pregnancy rate when the number of embryos transferred was controlled. Older women (>/=37 years old) had an apparently higher pregnancy rate (38.1 versus 20.4%; not significant) with ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer. In the subgroup where the clinician rated the transfer procedure as difficult, there appeared to be a substantial improvement in the pregnancy rate in the group that used ultrasound (54.5 versus 10.0%; not significant). Although our results were not statistically significant, we believe that ultrasound-guided embryo transfers should be used in clinically difficult embryo transfers and in older women, as it appears to improve the pregnancy rate over clinical touch transfers.     

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (ET) is widely suggested as a standard clinical practice that improves overall embryo implantation and pregnancy rates. Various studies of this issue suffer from methodological pitfalls, so that a randomized controlled trial, which overcomes these problems, might be valuable. METHODS: Three hundred women aged <40, who underwent fresh ET, were included in this randomized, double-blind controlled trial. The K-J-SPPE echo tip soft catheter was used for the ultrasound-guided ET and the traditional K-Soft catheter for ETs not using ultrasound. One experienced operator performed all ETs. The primary study outcome was overall pregnancy rate (defined as the number of positive hCG results per transfer). RESULTS: No significant differences between groups were found regarding baseline patient and embryological characteristics, except for male factor and unexplained infertility (higher in the blind and ultrasound-guided ET group, respectively, P < 0.05). Overall pregnancy rates were 53.3 and 51.3% in the ultrasound-guided and blind ET group, respectively. Two ectopic pregnancies were reported in each group. Difficulty in cervical negotiation did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing ET by an experienced operator, ultrasound guidance did not provide any benefit in terms of overall clinical pregnancy and embryo implantation rates.     

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggested that ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer might improve the pregnancy rate. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed to compare embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance versus the clinical touch method. A total of 800 embryo transfers was studied; 400 were randomized to ultrasound-guided transfers and 400 were randomized to the clinical touch group. Of these, 441 were fresh cycles and 359 were frozen-thawed cycles. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate was 26.0% in the ultrasound-guided group and 22.5% in the clinical touch group; the difference was not statistically significant. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 23.5% in the ultrasound-guided group compared with 19.0% in the clinical touch group and the difference was again not statistically significant. The implantation rate was slightly higher in the ultrasound-guided group (15.3%) than the clinical touch group (12.0%) (P = 0.048). There were no differences in the incidences of ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A significant improvement in implantation rate was observed following the use of ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer. The extent of improvement in the pregnancy rate may depend on the specific techniques and methods of embryo transfer used in individual centres.     

Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospective controlled study

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to determine whether moulding the embryo transfer catheter according to the uterocervical angle measured by ultrasound could improve pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS: Patients were alternately allocated to one of two groups. In the ultrasound-guided group (n = 320), the catheter was moulded according to the uterocervical angle measured by abdominal ultrasound. In controls (n = 320), embryo transfer was performed using the "clinical feel" method. RESULTS: Moulding the embryo transfer catheter according to the uterocervical angle significantly increased clinical pregnancy [(OR = 1.57, 95% CI (1.08-2.27)] and implantation rates [(OR = 1.47, 95% CI (1.10-1.96)] compared with the "clinical feel" method. It also significantly reduced difficult transfers [(OR = 0.25, 95% CI (0.16-0.40)] and blood during transfers [OR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.50-0.99)]. Patients with large angles (>60 degrees ) had significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with those with no angle [OR = 0.36, 95% CI (0.16-0.52)]. CONCLUSIONS: Moulding the embryo transfer catheter according to the uterocervical angle measured by ultrasound increases clinical pregnancy and implantation rates and diminishes the incidence of difficult and bloody transfers.     

Effect of using an echogenic catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in an IVF programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence showed that ultrasound-guided embryo transfer significantly increases successful implantation compared to the clinical touch method. It has been postulated that new echodense catheters which are more readily detectable by ultrasound may refine transfer techniques even more, thus improving IVF outcome. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing IVF outcome for women undergoing embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance by a single healthcare provider with random assignment according to a computer-generated randomization table to either standard soft Wallace catheter (standard catheter group, n=95) or the new echogenic soft Wallace catheter (echogenic catheter group, n=98). RESULTS: The use of the echodense catheter facilitated catheter identification under ultrasound, and thus the duration of the embryo transfer procedure since the loaded catheter was handed to the physician and up to embryo discharge was significantly shorter in the echogenic catheter group as compared with the standard catheter group. There were 39 and 53 clinical pregnancies in the standard catheter (41%) and echogenic catheter (54.1%) groups, respectively. This was not statistically significant (P=0.08) according to the OR (0.6) and CIs (0.33-1.04). However, twin pregnancy rate was significantly increased (P<0.01) with the use of the new catheter which was the underlying source for obtaining significant increase in implantation rate in this group (37.1%) as compared with the standard catheter group (23.2%). CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that the use of the echogenic Wallace catheter simplifies ultrasound-guided embryo transfer but not definite benefit in terms of pregnancy rates was obtained. In contrast, the use of the new catheter was associated with a significant increase in the number of twin pregnancies.     

Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5

BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer has been reported to affect success rates in some centres but not others. In a prospective study, we examined the influence of ultrasound guidance in embryo transfer performed on different days after oocyte retrieval. METHODS: Two different methods of embryo transfer were evaluated in 1069 consecutive transfers. The ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was used in 433 cases, whereas 636 embryo transfers were performed with the tactile assessment ('clinical feel') method. RESULTS: Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer yielded a higher overall pregnancy rate than the 'clinical feel' approach, 47 versus 36% (P < 0.001). This difference was statistically significant where embryos were transferred after 3 or 4 days of culture, 45.9 versus 37.1% (P = 0.001) and 42.3 versus 27% (P = 0.035) respectively but not significant (P = 0.112) on day 5 embryo transfer (56.3 versus 45.7%). Likewise, the implantation rate was significantly different between the two groups on day 3 and 4 embryo transfer, 23.3 versus 15.8% (P < 0.01) and 21.6 versus 15.7% (P < 0.05%) respectively but no statistical difference was noted on day 5 embryo transfer, 26.7 versus 23.6%. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound assistance in embryo transfer on day 3 and 4 significantly improved pregnancy rates in IVF but had no impact on day 5.     

Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The true impact of the embryo transfer catheter choice on an IVF programme has not been fully examined. We therefore decided to systematically review the evidence provided in the literature so that we may evaluate a single variable in relation to a successful transfer, the firmness of the embryo transfer catheter. METHODS: An extensive computerized search was conducted for all relevant articles published as full text, or abstracts, and critically appraised. In addition, a hand search was undertaken to locate any further trials. RESULTS: A total of 23 randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the types of embryo transfer catheters were identified. Only ten of these trials, including 4141 embryo transfers, compared soft versus firm embryo catheters. Pooling of the results demonstrated a statistically significantly increased chance of clinical pregnancy following embryo transfer using the soft (643/2109) versus firm (488/2032) catheters [P = 0.01; odds ratio (OR) = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.79]. When only the truly RCT were analysed, the results were again still in favour of using the soft embryo transfer catheters [soft (432/1403) versus firm (330/1402)], but with a greater significance (P < 0.00001; OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.26-1.77). CONCLUSION: Using soft embryo transfer catheters for embryo transfer results in a significantly higher pregnancy rate as compared to firm catheters.     

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy and implantation rates after IVF.

BACKGROUND: Attempts are constantly being made to improve clinical pregnancy rates after IVF and embryo transfer. Since November 1998, we have gradually been adopting transvaginal ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer. We retrospectively examined the efficacy of this method on pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS: The results of 846 cycles from our IVF-embryo transfer programme were analysed and comparisons were made between those carried out using ultrasound guidance and those by the clinical touch method. RESULTS: Higher pregnancy and implantation rates (28.9 and 15.2% respectively) were found in the group using the transvaginal ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer compared with those in the group using the clinical touch method (13.1 and 7.0% respectively). The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in ectopic pregnancy rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer significantly improved both pregnancy and implantation rates. Although technically difficult, we suggest its use may maximize the chances of achieving a successful pregnancy outcome.     

Does the choice of catheter for embryo transfer influence the success rate of in-vitro fertilization?

The performance of two different transfer catheters has been evaluated in 193 consecutive embryo transfers. Forty pregnancies were achieved, corresponding to a pregnancy rate of 21% of all embryo transfers. The Frydman catheter was used in 123 attempts whereas 70 embryo transfers were performed with the Tom Cat catheter. The Tom Cat catheter yielded a significantly higher pregnancy rate than the Frydman catheter (28% versus 16%; P = 0.03). The mean number of embryos transferred per attempt was similar in the two groups (2.9 +/- 0.1 and 3.0 +/- 0.1 in the Tom Cat and Frydman groups respectively) as was the quality. When more than three embryos were transferred, a pregnancy rate of 37% per embryo transfer was achieved using the Tom Cat versus 20% using the Frydman catheters (P = 0.03). A higher frequency of difficult transfer procedures was observed when the Frydman catheter was used while the Tom Cat performed much better in difficult cases. An alternate use of the two catheters suggests a significantly better performance of the Tom Cat catheter in relation to the efficiency of establishing pregnancy.     

Uterine position at real embryo transfer compared with mock embryo transfer

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the consistency in the uterine position between mock and real embryo transfer. METHODS: We reviewed 996 consecutive embryo transfer cycles (585 patients); 74% of patients had an anteverted (AV) uterus and 26% had a retroverted (RV) uterus at mock embryo transfer. All mock and real embryo transfers were performed under abdominal ultrasound guidance. RESULTS: Of 623 fresh embryo transfers in patients with an AV uterus at mock embryo transfer, only 2% became RV, while 55% of 213 embryo transfers in patients with an RV uterus on mock embryo transfer converted to AV at real embryo transfer (P < 0.0001). For frozen-thawed embryo transfer, 12% of AV uteri at mock embryo transfer became RV, while 33% of RV uteri became AV (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that an RV uterus at mock embryo transfer will often change position at real embryo transfer. Misdirecting the embryo transfer catheter can be avoided by accurate knowledge of the uterine position at the time of embryo transfer, which can be more accurately assessed by routine ultrasound guidance. Additionally, patients with an RV uterus at mock embryo transfer should still present with a full bladder for embryo transfer, since a significant number will convert to an AV position.     

Best site for embryo transfer: the upper or lower half of endometrial cavity?

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to determine the importance of the site of embryo transfer (upper or lower half endometrial cavity) on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. METHODS: A total of 400 transfers guided by ultrasound were randomly assigned to two groups according to the distance between the uterine fundus and the catheter tip at the time of embryo placement. Group I (n = 200) consisted of transfers corresponding to a distance of < 50% of the endometrial cavity length (ECL), i.e. transfer in upper half of the cavity; and group II (n = 200) consisted of transfers corresponding to a distance of > or = 50%, of the ECL, i.e. transfer in lower half of cavity. The Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test were used where appropriate. RESULTS: The general characteristics of the study population and the main transfer cycle characteristics had an equal distribution (P > 0.05) between groups I and II. No significant difference in implantation or pregnancy rates was observed between groups I and II. CONCLUSION: The implantation or pregnancy rates were similar whether the embryos were deposited in the upper or lower half of the endometrial cavity.     

Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization

Between October 1998 and January 1999, we examined the influence of ultrasound guidance in embryo transfer on pregnancy rate in 362 patients from our in-vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer programme. These patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: 182 had ultrasound-guided embryo replacement, and 180 had clinical touch embryo transfer. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to age, cause of infertility and in the characteristics of the IVF cycle. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher among the ultrasound-guided embryo transfer group (50%) compared with the clinical touch group (33.7%) (P < 0.002). Furthermore, there was also a significant increase in the implantation rate: 25.3% in the ultrasound group compared with 18.1% in the clinical touch group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, ultrasound assistance in embryo transfer significantly improved pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF.     

A randomized controlled trial of a soft double lumen embryo transfer catheter versus a firm single lumen catheter: significant improvements in pregnancy rates

BACKGROUND: Embryo transfer has changed little since originally described in 1978. Clinicians rate the type of catheter used as the third most important variable in embryo transfer, but there are no adequately powered randomized trials. We compared the clinical pregnancy rates with the single lumen catheter (TCC) and the double lumen catheter (CC) in a randomized single blind trial. METHODS: A total of 650 cycles of women from the Adelaide University reproductive medicine units in Australia were included in this trial. Patients were <40 years of age undertaking IVF and embryo transfer. Exclusion criteria were: known uterine abnormality, day 3 FSH >10 IU/l, previous difficult embryo transfer and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Cycles were randomized from numbered sealed envelopes immediately prior to embryo transfer with stratification for fresh or frozen cycles. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher pregnancy rate in the group treated with the CC compared with the TCC catheter [29.6 versus 20.5% per embryo transfer, odds ratio (OR) = 1.63 (95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.30), P = 0.0076]. The point estimate for the OR was similar for fresh and frozen cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The pregnancy rate was increased by 50% and this justifies the increased cost of the soft double lumen catheter and the training of clinical staff required.     

Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer

BACKGROUND: The respective advantages of day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer are a matter of debate. Previous comparisons did not include pronuclear stage zygote scoring and cumulative success rates (fresh and cryopreserved embryos). METHODS: Patients were randomized prospectively for day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer. Day 3 embryos were selected for transfer and cryopreservation by using combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages. RESULTS: There was no difference between day 3 and day 5 fresh embryo transfers as to the rates of pregnancy (58 versus 62%), clinical pregnancy (56 versus 58%), delivery (50 versus 48%), implantation (35 versus 38%) and birth (33 versus 36%) rates. The corresponding values for cryopreserved embryo transfers were also similar. However, day 3 embryo transfer compared favourably with day 5 transfer when the pregnancy (90 versus 66%), clinical pregnancy (85 versus 62%) and delivery (77 versus 52%) rates were calculated per oocyte recovery attempt. CONCLUSIONS: With a selected population of good prognosis patients and our embryo selection criteria, the implantation potential of day 3 and day 5 embryos is equal. Per oocyte recovery attempt, day 3 transfer is more clinically efficient than day 5 transfer, but at least one transfer of cryopreserved embryos is necessary to manifest this superiority.     

The impact of the embryo transfer catheter on the pregnancy rate in IVF

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess whether the type of embryo transfer set used for embryo transfer affects the ongoing pregnancy rate in IVF. METHODS: The TDT set was compared with the K-soft 5000 in a large, prospective, randomized study. Patients were randomized moments before transfer by drawing a consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque envelope indicating the catheter to be used. RESULTS: 2059 embryo transfers in 1296 patients were analysed. The ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the K-soft group. If the first transfer of a patient (n = 1296) within this study period was analysed, the ongoing pregnancy rates were 27.1 versus 20.5% (P = 0.006). If the analysis is limited to patients that underwent their very first transfer ever (n = 607), the ongoing pregnancy rates were 30.3 versus 20.0% (P = 0.003) in favour of the K-soft. CONCLUSION: We conclude from these data that the type of embryo transfer set used for embryo transfer does affect the ongoing pregnancy rate and that the impact of the variable transfer catheter on the ongoing pregnancy rate increases when the a priori chance of pregnancy increases.     

Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth.

To avoid multiple pregnancies without compromising pregnancy rates (PR) is a challenge in assisted reproduction. We have compared pregnancy results among 74 elective one-embryo transfers (group 2) and 94 transfers where only one embryo was available (group 1). All the fresh embryo cycles during 1997 in two clinics in Helsinki were analysed, and cumulative PR among these couples after frozen-thawed embryo transfers up to June 1998 were counted. In group 2, where at least two embryos were available for transfer, and only one was transferred on day 2 or 3, the PR per embryo transfer was 29.7%. In group 1, the PR per embryo transfer was 20.2%. In group 2, the cumulative PR after frozen-thawed embryo transfers was 47.3% per oocyte retrieval. Over the same time, 742 two-embryo transfers were carried out. The PR per embryo transfer was 29.4% in these subjects, but 23.9% of these pregnancies were twins. The implantation rates, as well as the PR, were highest when the embryos were at the four- to five-cell stage on day 2 (35.8 versus 9.7% compared with the two- to three-cell stage, P < 0.001) or at the six- to eight-cell stage on day 3 (45.5%). The PR per embryo transfer was higher when a grade 1 or 2 embryo was transferred compared with a grade three embryo (34. 0 and 26.7% versus 8.8% respectively, P < 0.05). In women 35 years or younger, the PR per elective one-embryo transfer was 32.8%. The corresponding figure in women older than 35 years was 18.8%. On the basis of these results, elective one-embryo transfer can be highly recommended, at least in subjects who are younger than 35 years of age, and who have grade one or grade two embryos available for transfer.     

Single embryo transfer is an option in frozen embryo transfer

BACKGROUND: A good strategy to decrease multiple pregnancy rate in assisted reproduction technology (ART) is the use of single embryo transfer (SET). METHODS: This retrospective study analysed 1647 frozen embryo transfers carried out during 1998-2003 in Helsinki University Central Hospital; of these, 872 were double embryo transfers (DETs) and 775 SETs. The SET group included 140 (18.1%) elective SETs (eSETs). RESULTS: The yearly rate of SETs in frozen cycles increased from 28 to 66%. Overall, the clinical pregnancy rate per frozen embryo transfer was 30.7% and the delivery rate 22.6%. The delivery rate was significantly higher in DET cryocycles than in SET cryocycles (25.7 versus 19.2%, respectively; P < 0.01). In DET cryocycles, the multiple delivery rate was 21.9%, 10 times higher than that observed in cryocycles with SET (2.0%) (P < 0.0001). When eSET was applied, no difference in delivery rate was observed when compared with cryocycles with DET (28.6 and 25.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SET can be used in frozen cycles to reduce multiple delivery rates.     

The usefulness of ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that implantation and pregnancy rates were improved with ultrasound-guided embryo transfer compared with clinical touch in fresh IVF cycles associated with supraphysiological ovarian steroid levels. However, the usefulness of ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer where potential hormonal influences are lacking has not been appropriately investigated. METHODS: A total of 184 consecutive patients undergoing thawed embryo transfer cycles with hormone replacement under pituitary suppression were randomized by computer-generated randomization table to two study groups: 93 had ultrasound-guided (group 1) and 91 had clinical touch (group 2) embryo transfer. RESULTS: There was equal distribution between the two study groups with respect to the main demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients as well as the characteristics of both prior IVF cycles from which embryos were generated and cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer cycles. However, both pregnancy and implantation rates in group 1 (34.4 and 19.8% respectively) were significantly higher than the corresponding values (19.7 and 11.9%) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer significantly increases pregnancy and implantation rates.     

Implantation: Two instead of three embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization

The rational of transferring two instead of three embryos wasstudied through 468 in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cyclesin 287 couples. The quality of 1224 embryos was determined accordingto the fragmentation rate and the morphology as good (A) andpoor (B). The influence of the number of embryos transferred(two or three) on the pregnancy rate when the same quality orcombinations of good and poor quality embryos transferred wasexamined. When only good quality embryos were transferred thepregnancy rates in double (AA) and triple (AAA) embryo transferwere 40.5 (17/42) and 42.9% (30/70) respectively (not significant).When only poor quality embryos were transferred, the pregnancyrates in double (BB) and triple (BBB) embryo transfers were11.0% (11/ 100) and 22.9% (16/70) respectively (P < 0.001).On the other hand, when good and poor quality embryos were transferredtogether as AB in double and as AAB and ABB in triple embryotransfer, the pregnancy rates were 36.8 (14/38) and 39.9% (59/148)respectively (not significant). There was no difference in themiscarriage rate between double and triple embryo transfers;16.7 and 18.1% respectively. The multiple pregnancy rate was14.3% for double embryo transfers and 32.4% for triple embryotransfers (P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that if thereis at least one good quality embryo available for transfer,then double instead of triple embryo transfer will not yielda significantly lower pregnancy rate. The influence of the numberof embryos transferred on the pregnancy rate became significantwhen only poor quality embryos were transferred. In conclusion,as long as at least one good quality embryo is available fortransfer, we may consider the transfer of double instead oftriple embryos.