MR angiography: supra-aortic vessels

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has become an imaging modality which comprises various techniques based on two concepts: methods relying on the natural flow effects, the time-of-flight and phase-contrast technique, either in two- or three-dimensional acquisition mode, and the more recently developed contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA methods. The main indications for evaluation of the supra-aortic vessels are, firstly, the grading of carotid artery stenoses caused by an atherosclerotic process, and secondly, the evaluation of dissections of the cervical arteries because this disease plays an important role as a cause for stroke especially in younger patients. The various MRA techniques in their application to the main pathologies encountered at the supra-aortic vessels are presented, and recent developments in the promising field of CE MRA are discussed.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) is a proven diagnostic tool in evaluation of the carotid arteries; however, few studies have addressed its accuracy in the vertebrobasilar system. The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of CE MRA compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for detection of vertebrobasilar disease. METHODS: Forty patients with suspected atherosclerotic disease of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations underwent CE MRA on a 1.5 T MR imaging scanner by use of a coronal 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence after intravenous injection of gadolinium diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid. All patients had correlative DSA within a 1-month period. CE MRA images were randomized and then independently assessed by 2 observers who were blinded to the DSA results. DSA examinations were analyzed in a similar manner. Each observer was asked to report the presence or absence of clinically significant stenosis (>50%), occlusion, fistula, aneurysm, and dissection. The MRA findings were then correlated with DSA. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of MRA for detection of disease in the entire carotid and vertebrobasilar systems were 90% and 97%, respectively; for the carotid system alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 97%, respectively; and for the vertebrobasilar system they were 88% and 98% respectively. The overall interobserver reliability was 98% (kappa = 0.92). CONCLUSION: CE MRA is accurate at detecting disease not only in the carotid vessels, but also in the vertebrobasilar circulation, and has the potential to provide a comprehensive and noninvasive evaluation of the head and neck arteries in a single study.     

Stellenwert der MR-Angiographie zur bildgebenden Diagnostik von Erkrankungen der Karotiden

During the last decade, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) evolved to an essential method for radiological diagnostics of extracranial arteries’ diseases. Contrast enhanced MRA enables meanwhile the acquisition of angiographic series in high diagnostic quality comparable to that originating from conventional DSA. Due to MRA, conventional DSA anymore plays a crucial role in the diagnostic assessment of carotid artery disease or highly vascularised tumors of the head and neck region. Besides reliable quantification of carotid stenoses, highly resolved MRI sequences provide a promising approach for characterization of plaque morphologies and thereby contribute to turn the risk for a stroke calculable. Furthermore, MRA has nearly replaced DSA in radiographics of carotid artery dissections whereas MRA has especially emerged as an appropriate method to visualize the intramural hematoma which is evidentiary for the diagnosis. However, not all methods of MRA are equivalent in respect to their diagnostic value. While CE MRA is able to completely substitute DSA in many clinical questions, applicability of flow-dependent Time-of-flight (TOF) or phase-contrast (PC) MRA is limited due to their distinct susceptibility to motion or flow-related artefacts.     

Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical use of MR angiography (MRA) for examining the pelvic and lower limb arteries in patients with arterial occlusive disease. METHOD: Seventy-six patients with clinical signs of peripheral arterial occlusive disease were included in the study. MRA was performed using a fast contrast-enhanced high-resolution 3D technique that covered the area from the distal abdominal aorta to the distal lower limbs in two examination steps. RESULTS: In all patients, diagnostic images comparable with those of conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) could be obtained. No false-negative findings were seen in the iliac, femoral, or popliteal arteries. Ten to 16% of the mild stenoses and 6-14% of the severe stenoses, mainly in the crural vessels, were overgraded compared with intraarterial DSA. Particularly in patients with proximal severe obstructions or occlusions, the crural segments could be depicted more clearly due to decreased arterial runoff in conventional angiography. CONCLUSION: The consistency of the excellent depiction of the vascular territories of the distal aorta and the pelvic and lower limb arteries in a standardized setting suggests great potential for the use of MRA in the primary diagnosis of peripheral arterial occlusive disease.     

Contrast-enhanced 3D FISP MR angiography of the aortic arch ostia: preliminary results

PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to evaluate three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) for the detection of ostial stenoses of the aortic arch. METHOD: Sixteen patients with suspected carotid atherosclerotic disease prospectively underwent digital subtraction angiography of the aortic arch followed by contrast-enhanced MRA using a 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) technique (TR = 5 ms, TE = 2 ms, flip angle = 30 degrees). Three neuroradiologists blindly measured stenoses on the catheter angiograms and MRA. Evaluation included the ostia of the innominate, left carotid, and left subclavian arteries. Any significant disagreement on catheter angiography was resolved by consensus. The MRA grades of each of the three observers were then compared with the consensus grades of the contrast angiogram. RESULTS: Forty-eight vessels were scored, of which five had significant stenoses. MRA demonstrated 100% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 52% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. The Bowker test for symmetry indicated no significant difference between conventional angiography and MRA scores (p = 0.32-0.75), and there was good agreement between the three observers (weighted kappa = 0.75-0.86). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced 3D FISP MRA may be a useful imaging modality for the detection of significant stenoses at the ostia of the major aortic arch branches.     

Accuracy of 3 T MR angioraphy in vertebral artery stenosis and coincidence with other cerebrovascular stenoses

Introduction

Ostium of vertebral artery (VA) is a common site of pseudostenosis on contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA). The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRA at 3 T in the evaluation of ostial stenosis of VA and to find associated coincidental stenoses using logistic regression analysis.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-five VA ostial regions from 72 patients who received CE-MRA of neck vessels, intracranial time of flight (TOF) MRA, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity and specificity of the CE-MRA in detection of ostial stenosis were calculated with reference standard of DSA. Ostial stenosis on MRA was correlated with coincidental lesions in intracranial and cervical arteries by logistic regression analysis.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of the CE-MRA were 100% and 80.4% for detection of significant stenosis. In case of significant stenoses, CE-MRA showed a tendency of overestimation with a false-positive rate of 52.5%. Logistic regression analysis showed that the stenoses of middle cerebral artery (MCA) on TOF MRA was associated with significant stenoses of VA ostia (OR?=?5.84, 95% confidence intervals 1.41–24.17).

Conclusion

CE-MRA is sensitive in detection of VA ostial stenosis although it has high false-positive rate. True positive ostial stenosis should be considered in cases of coincidental stenoses of MCA on TOF MRA.     

Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique.

PURPOSE: To determine whether computed tomographic (CT) angiography with the volume-rendering technique (VRT) can be used to accurately quantify carotid arterial stenosis and to identify occlusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT was performed in 23 patients who were referred for carotid stenosis evaluation. VRT images and shaded-surface display (SSD) images of 46 carotid arterial bifurcations were compared with findings from digital subtraction angiography (DSA). RESULTS: Agreement on stenosis category between VRT CT angiography and DSA was found in 39 (85%) of the 46 carotid arteries studied. VRT CT angiography was 92% (49 of 53) sensitive and 96% (82 of 85) specific for the detection of grade 2-3 stenoses (> or = 70% stenosis). Agreement on stenosis category between SSD CT angiography and DSA was found in 38 (83%) of the 46 carotid arteries studied. SSD CT angiography was 91% (48 of 53) sensitive and 93% (79 of 85) specific for the detection of grade 2-3 stenoses. Calcified stenoses were correctly graded at VRT CT angiography in 10 of the 10 cases with heavy mural calcified plaques, while eight of the 10 stenoses were accurately quantified at SSD CT angiography. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that VRT CT angiography is as accurate as SSD CT angiography in the evaluation of carotid arterial bifurcations.     

Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Additional Steady-State Acquisition of the Infragenicular Arteries in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if addition of infragenicular steady-state (SS) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to first-pass imaging improves diagnostic performance compared with first-pass imaging alone in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing whole-body (WB) MRA. Twenty consecutive patients with PAD referred to digital-subtraction angiography (DSA) underwent WB-MRA. Using a bolus-chase technique, first-pass WB-MRA was performed from the supra-aortic vessels to the ankles. The blood-pool contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium was used at a dose of 0.03 mmol/kg body weight. Ten minutes after injection of the contrast agent, high-resolution (0.7-mm isotropic voxels) SS-MRA of the infragenicular arteries was performed. Using DSA as the “gold standard,” sensitivities and specificities for detecting significant arterial stenoses (≥50% luminal narrowing) with first-pass WB-MRA, SS-MRA, and combined first-pass and SS-MRA were calculated. Kappa statistics were used to determine intermodality agreement between MRA and DSA. Overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant arterial stenoses with first-pass WB-MRA was 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.78) and 0.97 (0.94 to 0.99), respectively. In first-pass WB-MRA, the lowest sensitivity was in the infragenicular region, with a value of 0.42 (0.23 to 0.63). Combined analysis of first-pass WB-MRA and SS-MRA increased sensitivity to 0.81 (0.60 to 0.93) in the infragenicular region, with specificity of 0.94 (0.88 to 0.97). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant arterial stenoses with isolated infragenicular SS-MRA was 0.47 (0.27 to 0.69) and 0.86 (0.78 to 0.91), respectively. Intermodality agreement between MRA and DSA in the infragenicular region was moderate for first-pass WB-MRA (κ = 0.49), fair for SS-MRA (κ = 0.31), and good for combined first-pass/SS-MRA (κ = 0.71). Addition of infragenicular SS-MRA to first-pass WB MRA improves diagnostic performance.     

Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: accuracy compared with intraarterial x-ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens

PURPOSE: To compare three different magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques with x-ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent x-ray angiography, three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) focusing on the carotid bifurcation, high-resolution (HR) contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA, and time-resolved CE MRA. Stenoses of internal carotid arteries were evaluated by three independent observers on identical projection of x-ray angiography and MRA. Maximum stenosis grades on MRA were assessed additionally and correlated with endarterectomy specimens in 12 cases. RESULTS: Sensitivity for the detection of severe stenoses was excellent (100%) for all MRA techniques, and specificity was superior for three-dimensional TOF (96.7%) compared with HR CE MRA (80.6%) and time-resolved CE MRA (83.9%). The correlation between x-ray angiography and MRA for all stenoses was slightly superior for three-dimensional TOF and HR CE MRA compared with the time-resolved technique (kappa = 0.87 and 0.86 vs. 0.84). The same trend was seen for the interobserver agreement and for the correlation with endarterectomy specimens. Eleven up to 17 stenoses (depending on the MRA technique) were graded higher using additional projections. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional TOF MRA yielded even more accurate results than HR CE MRA in grading of stenoses near the carotid bifurcation. Therefore, a combination of both methods seems to be advantageous.     

Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Since 1996, several preliminary studies have shown the usefulness of contrast material-enhanced MR angiography for imaging supraaortic vessels. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: A blinded comparison of first-pass contrast-enhanced MR angiography with conventional DSA was performed in 120 patients (240 arteries). MR angiography was performed with a 1.5-T magnet with gradient overdrive equipment, by using a coronal radiofrequency-spoiled 3D fast low-angle-shot sequence after the intravenous injection of gadodiamide. The guidelines of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial for measuring stenosis of the internal carotid artery were applied on maximum intensity projection (MIP) images and conventional catheter angiograms. RESULTS: Grading of stenoses on MR angiograms agreed with grading of stenoses on DSA images in 89% of arteries. In the severe stenosis group (70-99%), agreement was 93%. All internal carotid occlusions (n = 28) and seven of nine pseudo-occlusions were accurately detected with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. The correlation between MR angiography and DSA for determination of minimal, moderate, and severe stenoses and occlusion was statistically significant (r = 0.91, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation with a large number of patients confirms that contrast-enhanced MR angiography could become a diagnostic alternative to DSA in the treatment of patients with carotid artery disease.     

Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography

Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) is a non-invasive alternative to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). CE MRA is increasingly used as a complement to Duplex in the preoperative assessment of carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to determine if CE MRA could replace preoperative DSA. CE MRA with a scan time of 10 or 28 s was performed in 24 consecutive patients who were scheduled for preoperative DSA because of Duplex-verified severe carotid artery stenosis. Two neuroradiologists measured the degree of stenosis with three different methods, and the image quality was evaluated. DSA was used as the gold standard. For detection of severe stenosis (N. American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (NASCET) > or =70%; European symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (ECST) > or =80%; common carotid artery method (CCAM) > or =80%), the sensitivity of CE MRA maximum intensity projection (MIP) compared with DSA was 82%-100 %, the specificity was 74%-93% and the accuracy was 77%-90%. The inter-observer agreement was higher, the image quality was better and the intracranial main arteries were better visualized with the 28 s than with the 10 s scan time. The enhancement of the jugular veins seen in 17% of the 10 s scans and in 58% of the patients with the 28 s scans did not interfere with the evaluation of the carotid arteries. CE MRA, preferably with a scan time of 28 s, can replace DSA in the preoperative assessment of most patients with carotid artery stenosis.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: a feasibility study

A contrast-enhanced, gradient-echo 3D pulse sequence providing angiographic information in 24 s was tested in five healthy subjects and used prospectively in 21 patients for the investigation of the cervical arteries. Indications included suspected stenosis of the carotid (in 13), or vertebral arteries (in 1), carotid dissection (3), variants of the branches of the aortic arch (2) and extracranial carotid aneurysms (2). The results in all patients were compared with those of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In patients with carotid stenosis, they were also compared with high-resolution 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA). Good quality MR angiograms of the neck vessels were obtained with the fast 3D sequence in 20 of the 21 patients. One claustrophobic patient was unable to co-operate. The degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis was graded correctly (compared to DSA) in 21 of 24 cases (87.5 %). Two mild stenoses were overestimated as moderate using the fast MR sequence and one high-grade stenosis was misdiagnosed as a complete occlusion. Carotid dissection was confirmed in one case and correctly excluded in two. Four extracranial ICA aneurysms in two patients, arterial variants and stenosis of the origin of the vertebral artery were correctly diagnosed using the contrast-enhanced MR angiogram. Three-dimensional TOF MRA was unsuccessful due to motion artefacts in half of the cases of ICA stenosis. Received: 6 August 1998 Accepted: 21 December 1998     

Renal artery stenosis: Comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in detecting renal artery stenosis using intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with possible renovascular hypertension were prospectively studied; 26 of them underwent both MRA and DSA. In these 26 cases, two readers assessed the number of renal arteries, the presence of stenoses and their degree. Results were compared with DSA, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of MRA were determined. Interobserver variability was also calculated. RESULTS: DSA showed 51 main renal arteries (one patient had a single kidney) and six accessory arteries (total number of arteries 57) in the 26 patients considered. Both MRA readers detected all of the 51 main renal arteries and only one accessory vessel. When the presence of stenosis was considered, the readers' results, respectively, were as follows: sensitivity 77% and 72%, specificity 69% and 69%, PPV 86% and 85%, NPV 55% and 50% and diagnostic accuracy 75% and 71%. When the detection of significant stenosis was considered, the results, respectively, were: sensitivity 83% and 83%, specificity 73% and 78%, PPV 60% and 65%, NPV 90% and 91%, and diagnostic accuracy 76% and 80%. Interobserver variation was good when considering stenosis detection (kappa=0.69) and excellent when considering detection of significant stenosis (kappa=0.85). CONCLUSIONS: MRA results do not appear as positive as in the majority of papers in the literature. Multiple reasons can probably be invoked to explain this difference. The mean age of our patients, higher than in many other studies, should be noted and may have accounted for their possible poor cooperation. Moreover, all of the missed significant stenoses were distally located, and therefore, the failure to detect them might be related to the suboptimal spatial resolution of MRA. Nevertheless, MRA showed a high NPV for detecting significant stenoses, a finding of considerable clinical relevance in that it allows patients with normal MRA findings to be spared additional more invasive procedures.     

Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography and extracranial color-coded duplex sonography are noninvasive, preoperative imaging modalities for evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Innovative techniques and improvements in image quality require frequent reassessment of accuracy, reliability, and diagnostic value compared with those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We evaluated contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography compared with DSA for detection of high-grade carotid artery stenoses. METHODS: Four readers, blinded to clinical symptoms and the outcome of other studies, independently evaluated stenoses on contrast-enhanced MR angiograms in 71 vessels of 39 symptomatic patients. Duplex sonography was also performed in all vessels. The severity of stenosis was defined according to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria (0-29%, 30-69%, 70-99%, 100%). Results of both modalities were compared with the corresponding DSA findings. RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.9% and 79.1%, respectively, for the identification of carotid artery stenoses of 70% or greater. Sensitivity and specificity of duplex sonography were 92.9% and 81.9%, respectively. Combining data from both tests revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 81.4%, respectively, for concordant results (80% of vessels). CONCLUSION: Concordant results of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography increase the diagnostic sensitivity to 100%. The reliability of MR angiography is comparable to that of DSA. The combination of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography might be preferable over DSA for preoperative evaluation in most patients, thus reducing the risk of perioperative morbidity and improving the overall outcome.     

NC100150-enhanced 3D-SPGR MR angiography of the common carotid artery in a pig vascular stenosis model. Quantification of stenosis and dose optimization.

PURPOSE: NC100150 is a new type of ultra-small iron oxide (USPIO) blood pool agent. The aim of this study was to compare NC100150-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) to time-of-flight (TOF) MRA, phase-contrast (PC) MRA, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in experimental stenoses in pigs, and furthermore to determine the optimal dose of the contrast agent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An experimental stenosis of the right and left common carotid artery (CCA) was applied surgically in 6 Yorkshire pigs. DSA was performed as the gold standard, followed by 3D-TOF, 3D-PC, and NC100150-enhanced MRA. RESULTS: Eleven stenoses of the CCA were successfully applied. The degree of the stenosis, determined by NC100150-enhanced MRA, did not differ significantly from DSA, whereas TOF and PC MRA underestimated it. The image quality of the NC100150-enhanced MRA was superior to both TOF and PC MRA. The optimal dose of NC100150 was 5-6 mg Fe/kg, since higher doses did not further increase signal-to-noise ratio or contrast-to-noise ratio. There was a linear relationship between blood relaxation rate and contrast dose. CONCLUSION: NC100150-enhanced MRA has the potential for quantification of carotid stenoses and provides an alternative to DSA. The optimal dose of NC100150 was 5-6 mg Fe/kg.     

MR angiography of internal carotid arteries: breath-hold Gd-enhanced 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession versus unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to compare Gd-enhanced breath-hold fast imaging with steady-state precession (Gd-FISP) with unenhanced time-of-flight (TOF) sequences in evaluating internal carotid arteries (ICAs). METHOD: Thirty patients underwent three unenhanced TOF sequences [2D traveling saturation (Travelsat); 3D tilted optimized nonsaturated excitation (TONE); TOF 3D Multislab] and two breath-hold 3D Gd-FISP sequences with automated intravenous contrast agent injection (axial and coronal). ICAs were classified as normal (no stenosis); with mild (<30%), moderate (30-70%), or severe stenosis; or occluded (100%). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with aortic arch injection was used as a reference technique. RESULTS: DSA revealed 20 normal ICAs; 11 mild, 9 moderate, and 14 severe stenoses; and 2 occlusions. DSA and all MR angiography (MRA) sequences diagnosed the occlusion of four common carotid arteries. The TOF 2D overestimated 10 stenoses, TOF 3D TONE 9, and TOF 3D Multislab 5; Gd-FISP 3D overestimated only 2 of them, reaching the highest sensitivity and specificity for severe stenoses. Significant differences were found between the overestimation of Gd-FISP and each of the three unenhanced sequences (0.0020 < p < 0.0313, Wilcoxon and McNemar tests). Severe artifacts were observed with TOF techniques only. CONCLUSION: Gd-FISP is an interesting, largely artifact-free improvement for MRA of ICAs.     

Magnetic resonance angiography in suspected cerebral vasculitis

The purpose of this study was to determine the technical capacity and diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in suspected cerebral vasculitis in a retrospective analysis of MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 14 young patients with clinical and/or radiological suspicion of cerebral vasculitis. A total of nine arteries were evaluated in each patient. Consensus review of DSA by three observers was the reference standard. The sensitivity for detecting a stenosis varied from 62 to 79% for MRA and from 76 to 94% for DSA, depending on the observer. The specificity for detecting a stenosis varied from 83 to 87% for MRA and from 83 to 97% for DSA. Using the criterion more than two stenoses in at least two separate vascular distributions to consider the examination as being true positive, the false-positive rates for MRA and DSA were comparable. MRA plays a role as the first angiographical examination in the diagnostic work-up of suspected cerebral vasculitis. When more than two stenoses in at least two separate vascular distributions are depicted on MRA, DSA is not expected to add a significant diagnostic contribution in a patient with suspected cerebral vasculitis. DSA remains necessary when MRA is normal or when less than three stenoses are seen.     

Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective,multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography

The purpose of this study was to compare moving-table three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA), using 1.0-mol gadobutrol, with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (i.a. DSA) for evaluation of pelvic and peripheral arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. A total of 203 patients were examined in a prospective, multi-centre study at 1.0/1.5 T. Ten vessel segments of one leg were evaluated on-site and by three independent blinded reviewers off-site. One hundred eighty-two patients were evaluable in blinded reading. For pelvis and thigh, there was statistically significant diagnostic agreement between CE MRA and i.a. DSA on-site (94%) and off-site (86-88%). Overall, for detection of clinically significant stenoses, 93% sensitivity and 90% specificity were achieved in on-site evaluation, with 71-76 and 87-93% off-site; for detection of occlusion, sensitivity and specificity on-site were 91 and 97%, with 75-82 and 94-98% off-site. Evaluation was more sensitive on-site than off-site for detection of stenoses and occlusion, whereas specificity was similar. The CE MRA with 1.0-mol gadobutrol gave results comparable to those of i.a. DSA for the larger arteries of pelvis and thigh. Results for calf arteries were compromised by spatial resolution and technical limitations.     

MR angiography of the supra-aortic arteries using a dedicated head and neck coil: image quality and assessment of stenoses

Our purpose was to evaluate a dedicated head and neck coil for demonstration of supra-aortic arteries with optimised magnetic resonance angiography techniques. We performed 47 examinations with a 1.5-T system. We used coronal 3D fast imaging with steady precession (FISP), axial 3D tilted optimised nonsaturating excitation (TONE) and 2D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) for the carotid bifurcation, axial 3D TONE with or without magnetisation transfer (MT) for intracranial arteries, and axial 3D FISP or TONE for the aortic arch. Evaluation included visual assessment of image quality and grading of stenoses near the carotid bifurcation; digital subtraction angiography was used as the reference method. Axial 3D TONE gave superior image quality at the carotid bifurcation, MT-TONE intracranially, and 3D FISP for the aortic arch vessels. Nevertheless, sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant stenoses were similar with coronal 3D FISP (96.3 %, 94.0 %), axial 3D TONE (92.6 %, 92.5 %) and axial 2D FLASH (96.3 %, 86.6 %). Image quality at the aortic arch needs further improvement. Received: 29 November 1996 Accepted: 7 February 1997     

MR-Angiographie der supraaortalen Gefäße

PURPOSE: To compare high resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the assessment of supraaortic vessel stenosis. METHODS: 14 patients with suspicion of cerebrovascular disease or upper limb ischemia underwent selective DSA and high resolution contrast enhanced MRA employing a new Panoramic-Array coil. Stenosis assessment in comparison to DSA followed NASCET criteria. Additionally signal-/noise ratios (SNR) were evaluated to assess contrast enhancement. RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was achieved in all patients. Sensitivity and specificity for assessing high-grade stenosis of the supraaortic vessels were 100% and 96% respectively. In the assessment of high-grade common or internal carotid artery stenosis sensitivity and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSION: High resolution contrast enhanced supraaortic MRA combined with new coil systems allow for a reliable assessment of stenoses along the whole vessel course including the aortic arch. Previous stent procedures limit its use in postinterventional follow-up.