典型和非典型抗精神病药合并碳酸锂治疗双相情感障碍躁狂发作的对照研究

目的探讨典型和非典型抗精神病药物合并碳酸锂治疗双相情感障碍躁狂发作患者的疗效。方法将94例双相情感障碍躁狂发作患者分为典型抗精神病药物组（43例）和非典型抗精神病药物组（51例）,进行为期8周的疗效比较。采用Bech-Rafaelsen躁狂量表（BRMS）、临床大体印象量表（CGI）、副反应量表（TESS）以及药物依从性量表分别于入组前和入组第1、2、4、6和8周末时进行评定。结果治疗结束时,两组BRMS评分较入组时均显著减低（P〈0．01）;临床总有效率：典型抗精神病药物组83．7％,非典型抗精神病药物组82．3％;两组疗效差异无显著性。非典型药物组的不良反应较典型组少,药物依从性较典型组高。结论非典型抗精神病药物治疗双相情感障碍躁狂发作的疗效肯定,不良反应较少,安全性高,依从性好,适合临床应用。     

Atypical antipsychotics: newer options for mania and maintenance therapy

Atypical antipsychotics have been used to treat patients with schizophrenia for many years, but now there is increasing evidence of their utility in the treatment of bipolar disorder. In the past few years several atypical agents have received regulatory approval for use in bipolar mania. Through a review of randomized controlled trials for five commonly used atypical drugs, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone and aripiprazole, this article evaluates their efficacy in the acute and maintenance phases of bipolar disorder. The evidence shows that atypical antipsychotics are effective in the treatment of manic symptoms, either alone or in combination with traditional mood stabilizers such as lithium and divalproex. Although emerging data indicate that atypical antipsychotics will be a promising addition to those therapies that are currently available for managing patients during the maintenance phase of bipolar illness, their potential in the long-term management of bipolar disorder remains to be fully explored.
Atypical antipsychotics appear to have broadly similar efficacy against manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, but there are important differences in their tolerability profiles, which are likely to be of particular relevance during long-term treatment. A brief assessment of tolerability issues surrounding the use of atypical agents in bipolar disorder and other aspects of treatment that have impact on the clinical effectiveness of the therapy are considered.     

Clinical research on antipsychotics in bipolar disorder

Antipsychotics are commonly used in bipolar disorder, both for acute mania and in maintenance treatment. The authors review available clinical research concerning the use of both conventional and atypical antipsychotics in bipolar disorder and present recommendations for a number of key clinical situations based on this review. They also consider a number of important related questions, including whether there is evidence for an increased risk of tardive dyskinesia (TD) in patients with bipolar disorder, the potential role for antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar depression, the role of antipsychotics in maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder, the potential for antipsychotics to induce depression in bipolar illness, and whether antipsychotics can be considered mood stabilizers with a place as monotherapy for bipolar mania. They conclude that standard treatment for acute mania should begin with a mood stabilizer, with benzodiazepines used as an adjunct for mild agitation or insomnia and antipsychotics used as an adjunct for highly agitated, psychotic, or severely manic patients. They also conclude that atypical antipsychotics are preferable to conventional antispychotics because of their more favorable side effect profile and reduced risk of tardive dyskinesia. They review the evidence for using atypical antipsychotics as first-line monotherapy for mania and conclude that more evidence concerning the risk of TD and their efficacy as maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder is needed before a conclusion can be made. Should the eventual risk of TD associated with atypical antipsychotics be found to be minimal and their efficacy in maintenance treatment found to be high, they could eventually be considered first line monotherapy for bipolar disorder. They conclude that treatment with an antipsychotic during bipolar depression should be limited to those patients who have psychosis and that atypical antipsychotics are preferred over conventional antipsychotics in this situation, not only because of their reduced risk of side effects but also because theoretically they may have antidepressant efficacy due to their effects on the serotonin system. The clinical research findings summarized in the article are, for the most part, supported by a recently published guideline based on a consensus of clinical experts.     

Comparison of treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms in patients with bipolar mania or schizophrenia during olanzapine clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Previous research on pharmacotherapy with conventional antipsychotics has suggested that patients with affective disorders have higher rates of treatment-emergent extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) than patients with schizophrenia. It is not known whether this differential vulnerability holds true for treatment with atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine. The present analysis retrospectively examined olanzapine clinical trial data for incidence of treatment-emergent EPS in patients with either schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. METHOD: Study participants were 4417 patients meeting DSM-III or DSM-IV criteria for either schizophrenia or bipolar mania participating in olanzapine clinical trials through July 31, 2001. Data were pooled across haloperidol-controlled trials and separately across placebo-controlled trials. Measures of EPS included rates of treatment-emergent EPS adverse event by type (i.e., dystonic, parkinsonian, or residual), Simpson-Angus Scale score mean change, rates of treatment-emergent parkinsonism, and rates of anticholinergic use. RESULTS: Consistent with prior research, haloperidol-treated patients with bipolar disorder appeared to be more vulnerable to the development of EPS than those with schizophrenia. However, olanzapine-treated patients with bipolar disorder were no more likely to develop EPS than those with schizophrenia. CONCLUSION: Results support previous research regarding conventional antipsychotics and suggest that olanzapine therapy does not increase the risk of EPS for patients with bipolar disorder.     

Comparative efficacy of typical and atypical antipsychotics as add-on therapy to mood stabilizers in the treatment of acute mania.

BACKGROUND: Typical antipsychotics are commonly used in combination with mood stabilizers for acute mania. Although typical antipsychotics are effective, they have undesirable side effects such as induction of depressive symptoms and tardive dyskinesia. Atypical antipsychotics have more favorable side effect profiles, and recent evidence shows their efficacy in treating mania. Apart from a previous small study that compared risperidone with typical neuroleptics as add-on therapy to mood stabilizers, no studies to date have directly compared atypical antipsychotics with typical antipsychotics as add-on therapy to mood stabilizers in a clinically relevant, naturalistic setting. METHOD: This study is a chart review of all patients with DSM-IV-defined bipolar disorder, current episode mania (N = 204), admitted to the University of British Columbia Hospital during a 30-month period. Patients were separated into 3 groups according to the medications used: (1) mood stabilizer and typical antipsychotic, (2) mood stabilizer and atypical antipsychotic, and (3) combination: mood stabilizer plus a typical antipsychotic, then switched to mood stabilizer plus risperidone or olanzapine within I week. The atypical group was further subdivided into risperidone and olanzapine subgroups. Outcome was measured using Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and -Improvement (CGI-I) ratings generated by review of clinical information in the chart. RESULTS: Patients treated with typical antipsychotics were more severely ill at admission and at discharge than those treated with atypical antipsychotics. Patients in the atypical (p < .005) and combination (p < .05) groups showed significantly greater clinical improvement at discharge than patients treated with typical antipsychotics. This difference was also significant in the subset of patients with psychotic features (p < .03). Risperidone and olanzapine were associated with fewer extrapyramidal side effects than were typical antipsychotics (risperidone vs. typical antipsychotics, chi2 = 8.72, p < .01; olanzapine vs. typical antipsychotics, chi2 = 16.9, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Due to their superior effectiveness and side effect profile when compared with typical antipsychotics. atypical antipsychotics are an excellent choice as add-on therapy to mood stabilizers for the treatment of patients with mania.     

Adjunctive risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine for the treatment of hospitalized patients with bipolar I disorder: a retrospective study

This study evaluated the overall effectiveness and tolerability of atypical antipsychotics (risperidone vs. olanzapine vs. quetiapine) used in the treatment of bipolar inpatients. After screening 463 patients, the medical records of 158 inpatients with bipolar I disorder, who were given olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine as adjuncts to mood stabilizers for at least 1 month and not administered with any other antipsychotics, were examined. Details of the tolerability and effectiveness were reviewed according to the treatment records during their hospital stay. The results showed equivalent effectiveness based on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) score between the three atypical antipsychotics. The frequency of the extrapyramidal symptom-related side effects were higher in the risperidone-treated group than in the olanzapine and quetiapine-treated group. This suggests that risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine have a comparable effectiveness in inpatients with bipolar I disorder in a naturalistic setting. However, there were some differences in tolerability between these results as reported from previous Western studies.     

Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of mania: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy for atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of mania in bipolar disorder, either as monotherapy or adjunctive treatment. However, there are no published comparisons of individual atypical antipsychotics for mania. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled monotherapy and adjunctive therapy trials of atypical antipsychotics for acute bipolar mania. Studies published through 2004 were identified using searches of PubMed/MEDLINE with the search terms mania, placebo, and each of the atypical antipsychotics, limited to randomized, controlled clinical trials; review of abstracts from the 2003 meetings of the American College of Neuropsychiatry, American Psychiatric Association, and International Conference on Bipolar Disorder; and consultations with study investigators and representatives of pharmaceutical companies that market atypical antipsychotics. DATA EXTRACTION: Analyses were performed on the changes in Young Mania Rating Scale or Mania Rating Scale total scores from baseline to endpoint, using last observation carried forward and computing the difference in change scores between each drug and its corresponding placebo arm. A random-effects model with fixed drug effects was used to combine the studies and make comparisons of the antipsychotics to each other and to placebo. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data from 12 placebo-controlled monotherapy and 6 placebo-controlled adjunctive therapy trials involving a total of 4304 subjects (including 1750 placebo-treated subjects) with bipolar mania were obtained. Aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone all demonstrated significant efficacy in monotherapy (i.e., all confidence intervals exclude zero). However, after adjusting for multiple comparisons, pairwise comparisons of individual effects identified no significant differences in efficacy among antipsychotics. Magnitude of improvement was similar whether the antipsychotic was utilized as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The 5 newer atypical antipsychotics were all superior to placebo in the treatment of bipolar mania. For monotherapy and add-on therapy, cross-trial comparisons suggest that differences in acute efficacy between the drugs, if any, are likely to be small.     

Acute and maintenance treatment of bipolar mania: the role of atypical antipsychotics

Abstract:  Bipolar disorder is a complex condition including depression, mania, and in many cases associated with comorbid anxiety symptoms and substance abuse. Mood stabilizers including lithium and divalproex have been considered standard therapy for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder, but remission rates remain inadequate. Conventional antipsychotics have demonstrated efficacy for acute mania, but they appear to have little role in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. Despite substantial evidence of efficacy and recent guideline recommendations, atypical antipsychotics remain underused for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Data from double-blind, controlled trials are available for a number of clinically meaningful efficacy measures, including improvement in manic symptoms, onset of action, response rates, remission rates, improvement in comorbid depressive symptoms, and induction/worsening of mania or depression. Atypical antipsychotics are effective both as alternatives to lithium or divalproex as monotherapy, or in combination with these mood stabilizers, in the acute and likely the maintenance treatment of mania. The atypical antipsychotics represent an effective and relatively safe addition to our armamentarium for the treatment of bipolar disorder.     

Atypical antipsychotic augmentation of mood stabilizer therapy in bipolar disorder

Although monotherapy with lithium or divalproex is the recommended initial therapy for bipolar disorder, these agents are associated with prolonged favorable outcomes in only 30% of patients. Increasingly, the medical literature is demonstrating that augmentation of mood stabilizers with atypical antipsychotics is a more effective therapy. This form of combination therapy is recommended as first-line treatment for severe bipolar mania. Recent clinical studies have shown that augmentation therapy with the atypical antipsychotics risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone is effective in long-term maintenance treatment, and preliminary evidence is emerging that use of atypicals with mood stabilizers can help control the depressive phase of bipolar disorder. The atypical antipsychotics also have relatively mild side effect profiles, although augmentation therapy with some antipsychotics and mood stabilizers has been associated with excessive weight gain.     

Bipolar depression: a new role for atypical antipsychotics?

Bipolar depression, the most common phase of bipolar disorder, causes significant morbidity and mortality. Traditional drugs such as lithium, lamotrigine or antidepressants each offer some clinical efficacy; however, efficacy can be limited and side effects are sometimes problematic. Thus there is a major unmet need for effective, well-tolerated agents for the treatment of bipolar depression. The atypical antipsychotics, with their proven efficacy against manic symptoms, are emerging as candidates for use against the depressive phase of bipolar disorder. Several studies have shown that some atypicals improve depressive symptoms in mixed episodes in patients with bipolar disorder; however, few studies have been performed in patients specifically with bipolar depressive episodes. In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with acute bipolar I depression, olanzapine monotherapy and an olanzapine-fluoxetine combination significantly improved Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores compared with placebo (p < 0.001) with corresponding effect sizes (improvement of active treatment over placebo divided by pooled standard deviation) of 0.32 and 0.68, respectively. Importantly, there were no significant differences in rates of switch into mania among the three groups. Recent results from an 8-week, randomized placebo-controlled trial in patients with bipolar I and II disorder who were experiencing a bipolar depressive episode showed that quetiapine (300 and 600 mg/day) had significantly greater efficacy compared with placebo in improving the core symptoms of depression, including suicidal thoughts. Quetiapine significantly improved MADRS total scores compared with placebo (p < 0.001); effect sizes (improvement of quetiapine over placebo divided by pooled standard deviation) of 0.66 and 0.80 for 300 and 600 mg/day quetiapine, respectively, were observed. Both doses of quetiapine significantly improved symptoms of anxiety, sleep quality and global quality of life (all, p < 0.001 versus placebo). These initial findings suggest that atypical antipsychotics may prove to be important future treatments for patients with bipolar depression.     

Treatment of bipolar mania with risperidone

In patients with bipolar disorder antipsychotics are frequently used for the treatment of acute manic episodes, either in monotherapy, in addition to a mood stabilizer or in patients refractory to lithium or other mood stabilizers. However, a number of studies demonstrated that the use of conventional neuroleptics is restricted -- particularly for long-term treatment and relapse prevention in bipolar disorder -- due to their side effect profile and their potential to induce or worsen depressive symptoms. In contrast, atypical antipsychotics have a better tolerability profile and fewer extrapyramidal side effects. A number of clinical studies showed that the atypical antipsychotic risperidone was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of bipolar mania. This was reported both for the treatment of acute episodes and for the maintenance therapy. Recent data suggest that risperidone can be used effectively either in addition to or even instead of a mood stabilizer. This review summarizes the available literature on risperidone in the treatment of bipolar disorders.     

Update on quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar disorder: results from the BOLDER studies

The essential features of bipolar affective disorder involve the cyclical occurrence of high (manic or hypomanic episodes) and low mood states. Depressive episodes in both bipolar I and II disorder are more numerous and last for longer duration than either manic or hypomanic episodes. In addition depressive episodes are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. While multiple agents, including all 5 atypical antipsychotics, have demonstrated efficacy and earned US FDA indication for manic phase of bipolar illness, the acute treatment of bipolar depression is less well-studied. The first treatment approved by the US FDA for acute bipolar depression was the combination of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine and the antidepressant fluoxetine. Recently, quetiapine monotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of depressive episodes associated with both bipolar I and II disorder and has earned US FDA indication for the same.     

Pediatric bipolar disorder: emerging diagnostic and treatment approaches

Children and adolescents who have bipolar disorder often are encountered in clinical settings and frequently require treatment with mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics. New screening and diagnostic tools are available to aid in the diagnosis of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents. Additional data supporting the use of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics in this population also are emerging. Combinations of existing psychotropics remain the most effective treatment of pediatric bipolar disorder at this point. This article reviews the phenomenology and clinical characteristics of pediatric bipolar disorder and current approaches to pharmacotherapy. It is becoming apparent that bipolar disorder is often a chronic disorder in children and adolescents, much like diabetes, and is best managed with a combination of medications and psychosocial therapy.     

The role of atypical antipsychotics in bipolar depression and anxiety disorders

Abstract:  Bipolar disorder is a complex condition that includes symptoms of mania, depression, and often anxiety. Diagnosing and treating bipolar depression is challenging, with the disorder often being diagnosed as unipolar depression. In addition, comorbid anxiety can be a significant detractor to successful outcomes, increasing symptom severity, frequency of episodes and suicide rates, and decreasing response to antidepressant therapy. Anxiety often precedes and hastens the onset of bipolar disorder, and a shared genetic etiology has been suggested. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics for the acute and maintenance treatment of mania. Evidence from studies in patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and bipolar depression indicate that these agents may also have antidepressant effects. In open trials in patients with bipolar mania, risperidone therapy has led to significant reductions in depression scores compared with baseline. Reductions in depression scores in patients with bipolar mania have been significantly greater with olanzapine compared with placebo. In patients with bipolar depression, the combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine resulted in significant improvement in depression compared with olanzapine alone or placebo. Although little data are available on the effects of these agents on comorbid anxiety in patients with bipolar disorder, some atypical antipsychotics have demonstrated efficacy in patients with anxiety disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Thus, atypical antipsychotics represent an important therapeutic option for the treatment of bipolar disorder, providing improvements in manic, depressive, and anxiety symptoms.     

Treatment adherence with antipsychotic medications in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES: Atypical antipsychotic medications are a relatively new, increasingly prominent component of the treatment armamentarium for bipolar disorder. Information on adherence with antipsychotics among individuals with bipolar disorder in general, and atypical antipsychotics in particular, is currently quite limited. Using data from the VA National Psychosis Registry, we examined adherence with antipsychotic medications among patients with bipolar disorder (n = 73,964). METHODS: Antipsychotic medication adherence among veterans with bipolar disorder was evaluated using the medication possession ratio and categorizing patients into three groups: fully adherent, partially adherent and non-adherent. We compared characteristics of bipolar patients who received versus those who did not receive antipsychotic medication, and also identified predictors of poor adherence with antipsychotic medications. RESULTS: Approximately 45% (n = 32,993) of all individuals with bipolar disorder were prescribed antipsychotic medication. Individuals who were prescribed antipsychotic medications were younger and more often had comorbid substance abuse or post-traumatic stress disorder compared to individuals with bipolar disorder who were not prescribed antipsychotic medication. Just over half (51.9%) of individuals appear to be fully adherent with antipsychotic medications, while 48.1% of individuals are either partially adherent or non-adherent with antipsychotic medications. Factors associated with treatment non-adherence were younger age, minority ethnicity, comorbid substance abuse and homelessness. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment non-adherence is a major issue for close to half of individuals with bipolar disorder prescribed antipsychotic medication. Additional studies are needed to better understand treatment adherence within the full range of pharmacologic therapies among individuals with bipolar disorder.     

Role of aripiprazole in treating mood disorders

Atypical antipsychotics have been used to treat patients with schizophrenia for many years, but now there is increasing evidence of their utility in the treatment of mood disorders. In the past few years, several atypical agents have received regulatory approval for use in mania. The evidence shows that atypical antipsychotics are effective in the treatment of manic symptoms, either alone or in combination with traditional mood stabilizers, such as lithium and divalproex. Although emerging data indicate that atypical antipsychotics will be a promising addition to those therapies that are currently available for managing patients during the maintenance phase of bipolar illness, their potential in the long-term management of bipolar disorder remains to be fully explored. Aripiprazole is a recently released antipsychotic medication that differs from other atypical antipsychotic agents by its mode of action as a dopamine D2 partial agonist. It is administered orally and has a long half-life. Randomized studies have demonstrated the efficacy of aripiprazole compared with placebo in the treatment of acute relapse of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, maintenance treatment of schizophrenia, treatment of acute mania, and prevention of manic relapse in patients who responded to the drug during a manic episode. Further studies are ongoing in bipolar and unipolar depression. Aripiprazole is generally well tolerated compared with other antipsychotic medications, although commonly reported side effects include extrapyramidal symptoms and motoric activation similar to akathisia. Further studies and postmarketing data will be helpful in providing additional information regarding the comparative safety, efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole in the treatment of affective disorders.     

Risperidone in the treatment of bipolar mania

Atypical antipsychotic medications have assumed growing importance for the treatment of bipolar disorder, an illness that affects approximately 1.2%–3.7% of the general population in a given year. Current practice guidelines for the treatment of bipolar mania support the use of atypical antipsychotic medications as monotherapy or as a component of polytherapy, and in clinical settings the use of atypical antipsychotics to treat bipolar disorder is widespread. Risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic, sometimes referred to as a second-generation antipsychotic. The receptor-binding profile of risperidone, which includes potent antagonism of the serotonin 5-HT2_A, dopamine D₂, and alpha-adrenergic receptors, is believed to be related to positive effects on mood. The FDA-approved bipolar indications for risperidone include: 1) monotherapy for short-term treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder and 2) combination therapy with lithium or valproate for the short-term treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. This review of risperidone for bipolar mania will address the chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and metabolism of risperidone, use with concomitant medications, clinical trials in bipolar mania, as well as safety and tolerability issues. Finally, dosing and administration are addressed as well as use for bipolar mania in geriatric, child, or adolescent patients.     

Adjunctive olanzapine treatment in bipolar adolescents responding insufficiently to mood stabilizers

This report was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine treatment as an adjunct therapy to mood stabilizers in the treatment of four adolescents responding insufficiently to mood stabilizers. All patients were diagnosed with bipolar I disorder according to DSM IV criteria. YMRS (Young mania rating scale) and CGI (Clinical global impression, improvement and therapeutic effectiveness scales) were used to evaluate overall response of the episode to the drugs. All patients with no adequate response to mood stabilizers did respond to adjunctive olanzapine treatment (10-30 mg/per day). It has been suggested that antipsychotics may be useful as an adjunct to mood stabilisers in bipolar disorder. However, further research is warranted regarding the use of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents.     

A typical mood stabilizers: a "typical role for atypical antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential role of atypical antipsychotics as mood stabilizers.METHOD: A MedLine, PsychLIT, PubMed, and EMBASE literature search of papers published up to December 2004 was conducted using the names of atypical antipsychotics and a number of key terms relevant to bipolar disorder. Additional articles were retrieved by scrutinizing the bibliographies of review papers and literature known to the authors. Data pertinent to the objective was reviewed according to the various phases of bipolar disorder.RESULTS: The data is most substantive for the use of atypical antipsychotics in mania, to the extent that an argument for a class effect of significant efficacy can be made. This does not extend to bipolar depression, however, good data is now emerging for some agents and will need to be considered for each individual agent as it accumulates. As regards mixed states and rapid cycling the evidence is thus far sparse and too few maintenance studies have been conducted to make any firm assertions. However, with respect to long-term therapy the atypical antipsychotics do have clinically significant side-effects of which clinicians need to be aware.CONCLUSION: Based on the evidence thus far it is perhaps premature to describe the atypical antipsychotics as mood stabilizers. Individual agents may eventually be able to claim this label, however, much further research is needed especially with respect to maintenance and relapse prevention.