Mechanism of propensity to atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter

Mechanism of propensity to atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing isthmus ablation for atrial flutter (AFL) may reveal postablation atrial fibrillation (AF). The electrophysiological mechanism is unclear. In patients with idiopathic AF, enhanced spatial dispersion of right atrial refractoriness was the substrate for the initiation of AF. We hypothesize that dispersion of right atrial refractoriness in patients undergoing AFL ablation is the major cause of postablation AF. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=42) undergoing isthmus ablation for typical AFL were included. Twelve right atrial unipolar electrograms were recorded. Inducibility of AF was assessed by a pacing protocol, starting with one extrastimulus, followed by more aggressive pacing until AF was induced. Mean fibrillatory intervals were used to assess local refractoriness of each recording site. Spatial dispersion of right atrial refractoriness was calculated as the coefficient of dispersion (CD-value: standard deviation of the mean of all local mean fibrillatory intervals as a percentage of the overall mean fibrillatory interval). A CD-value of 3.0 or less was defined as normal, whereas CD-value greater than 3.0 was considered enhanced dispersion. PES and refractoriness analysis were followed by isthmus ablation. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients, 29 had CD-value of 3.0 or less. In these 29 patients, AF was induced with 1 extrastimulus in only 1 patient, with 2 extrastimuli in 4 patients and burst pacing was required to induce AF in 24 of these 29 patients. Prior to the procedure, 5 of 29 patients had AF episodes, after ablation 6 of 29 patients. Of the 42 patients, 13 had CD-value greater than 3.0, AF was induced with a single extrastimulus in 11 patients, with 2 extrastimuli in the remaining 2 patients. Of the 13 patients, 11 had AF episodes both before and after ablation (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Enhanced spatial dispersion of right atrial refractoriness may be the substrate for propensity to AF in patients with AFL. The substrate was associated with enhanced inducibility of atrial fibrillation.     

Effects of simultaneous atrioventricular pacing on atrial refractoriness and atrial fibrillation inducibility: role of atrial mechanoelectrical feedback

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an acute increase in atrial pressure on refractoriness (mechanoelectrical feedback) and the vulnerability to atrial fibrillation (AF) and to investigate the effects of autonomic blockade and verapamil on mechanoelectrical feedback in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: Right atrial pressure and effective refractory period (ERP) at the right atrial appendage (RAA) and high right atrial septum were measured during sinus rhythm, and during atrial and simultaneous AV pacing at a cycle length of 300 msec, either in the absence (n = 25) or presence (n = 22) of pharmacologic autonomic blockade. In another 15 patients, the protocol was performed before and after infusion of verapamil 0.15 mg/kg. In the absence of autonomic blockade, AV pacing resulted in a higher mean right atrial pressure (11.7 +/- 3.3 vs 4.3 +/- 3.0 mmHg, P < 0.001) and a shorter atrial RAA ERP (144 +/- 23 msec vs 161 +/- 21 msec; P < 0.001) compared with atrial pacing; AF was induced more often during AV pacing (87%) than during atrial pacing (20%) and was related directly to the right atrial pressure (r = 0.39, P = 0.004) and indirectly to the RAA ERP (r = -0.42, P < 0.001). The susceptibility to sustained AF was greatly enhanced by autonomic blockade. Verapamil markedly attenuated the shortening of ERP and the propensity for AF that occurred during simultaneous AV pacing. CONCLUSION: An acute increase in atrial pressure during tachycardia is associated with shortening of atrial refractoriness and a propensity for AF, i.e., atrial mechanoelectrical feedback, which may be enhanced by autonomic blockade and attenuated by calcium channel blockade.     

Effect of Atrial Pressure Increase on Effective Refractory Period and Vulnerability to Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Lone Atrial Fibrillation

Background: There is evidence suggesting that atrial fibrillation (AF) may be induced by acute increase of atrial pressure. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of alterations in atrial pressure, induced by varying the atrioventricular (AV) interval, on atrial refractoriness, and on the frequency of induction of (AF), in patients with a history of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF).Methods and Results: Twenty-five patients were included in this study. The patients were divided in two groups: the LAF group, and the control group. None of the patients in either group had organic heart disease. Effective refractory period (ERP) and duration of atrial extrastimulus electrogram (A₂) were measured at two right atrial sites (high lateral wall, atrial appendage) during AV pacing (cycle length: 500 msec) with different AV intervals. Peak, minimal and mean atrial pressure increased from 8.57 ± 2.37 to 18.14 ± 4.74 mm Hg, 2 ± 2.23 to 5.14 ± 2.60 mm Hg (p = 0.0001) and from 4.28 ± 1.6 mm Hg to 9.77 ± 2.9 mm Hg (p = 0.001), respectively during AV interval modification. During lateral and atrial appendage pacing, with a progressive decrease of AV interval to 160, 100, 80, 40, 0 msec, the ERP, the dispersion of ERP, functional refractory period (FRP), A2 and latency period (LP) did not change significantly, in both groups. The frequency of induction of AF was not statistically different in both lateral atrial wall and appendage, during pacing in different AV intervals.Conclusions: This study demonstrates that alterations in the intraatrial pressure does not have important effects on atrial refractoriness and does not increase vulnerability to AF in patients with a history of LAF.     

Association of human connexin40 gene polymorphisms with atrial vulnerability as a risk factor for idiopathic atrial fibrillation

Alterations in distribution, density, and properties of cardiac gap junctions, which mediate electrical coupling of cardiomyocytes, are considered potentially arrhythmogenic. We recently reported 2 linked polymorphisms within regulatory regions of the gene for the atrial gap junction protein connexin40 (Cx40) at nucleotides -44 (G-->A) and +71 (A-->G), which were associated with familial atrial standstill. The present study examined whether these Cx40 polymorphisms were associated with increased atrial vulnerability in vivo and arrhythmia susceptibility. In 30 subjects without structural heart disease, of whom 14 had documented sporadic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and 16 had no AF history, inducibility of AF was assessed using an increasingly aggressive atrial stimulation protocol. Coefficient of spatial dispersion of refractoriness (CD) was calculated. CD was defined as the SD of 12 local mean fibrillatory intervals recorded at right atrial sites, expressed as a percentage of the overall mean fibrillatory interval. Cx40 genotypes were determined by direct DNA sequencing. Subjects were stratified according to normal or increased CD with a cutoff value of 3.0, because CD >3.0 was previously shown to be strongly associated with enhanced atrial vulnerability. The prevalence of the minor Cx40 allele (-44A) and -44AA genotype was significantly higher in subjects with increased dispersion (n=13) compared with those with CD < or =3.0 (n=17; P=0.00046 and P=0.025; odds ratios of 6.7 and 7.4) and a control population (n=253; P=0.00002 and P=3.90x10(-7)). Carriers of -44AA genotype had a significantly higher CD compared with those with -44GG genotype (6.37+/-1.21 versus 2.38+/-0.39, P=0.018), whereas heterozygotes had intermediate values (3.95+/-1.38, NS). All subjects with increased CD had a history of idiopathic AF compared with only 1 subject with normal CD. The -44A allele and -44AA genotype were significantly more frequent in subjects with prior AF than in those without (P=0.0019 and P=0.031; odds ratios 5.3 and 6.2). This study provides strong evidence linking Cx40 polymorphisms to enhanced atrial vulnerability and increased risk of AF. The full text of this article is available online at http://circres.ahajournals.org.     

Enhanced dispersion of atrial refractoriness as an electrophysiological substrate for vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Atrial electrical remodeling plays a part in recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). It has been related to an increase in heterogeneity of atrial refractoriness that facilitates the occurrence of multiple reentry wavelets and vulnerability to AF. AIM: To examine the relationship between dispersion of atrial refractoriness (Disp_A) and vulnerability to AF induction (A_Vuln) in patients with clinical paroxysmal AF (PAF). METHODS: Thirty-six patients (22 male; age 55+/-13 years) with > or =1 year of history of PAF (no underlying structural heart disease--n=20, systemic hypertension--n=14, mitral valve prolapse--n=1, surgically corrected pulmonary stenosis--n=1), underwent electrophysiological study (EPS) while off medication. The atrial effective refractory period (AERP) was assessed at five different sites--high (HRA) and low (LRA) lateral right atrium, high interatrial septum (IAS), proximal (pCS) and distal (dCS) coronary sinus--during a cycle length of 600 ms. AERP was taken as the longest S1-S2 interval that failed to initiate a propagation response. Disp_A was calculated as the difference between the longest and shortest AERP. A_Vuln was defined as the ability to induce AF with 1-2 extrastimuli or with incremental atrial pacing (600-300 ms) from the HRA or dCS. The EPS included analysis of focal electrical activity based on the presence of supraventricular ectopic beats (spontaneous or with provocative maneuvers). The patients were divided into group A--AF inducible (n=25) and group B--AF not inducible (n=11). Disp_A was analyzed to determine any association with A_Vuln. Disp_A and A_Vuln were also examined in those patients with documented repetitive focal activity. Logistic regression was used to determine any association of the following variables with A_Vuln: age, systemic hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial size, left ventricular function, duration of PAF, documented atrial flutter/tachycardia and Disp_A. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to clinical characteristics and echocardiographic data. AF was inducible in 71% of the patients and noninducible in 29%. Group A had greater Disp_A compared to group B (105+/-78 ms vs. 49+/-20 ms; p=0.01). Disp_A was >40 ms in 50% of the patients without A_Vuln and in 91% of those with A_Vuln (p=0.05). Focal activity was demonstrated in 14 cases (39%), 57% of them with A_Vuln. Disp_A was 56+/-23 ms in this group and 92+/-78 ms in the others (p=0.07). Using logistic regression, the only predictor of A_Vuln was Disp_A (p=0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with paroxysmal AF, Disp_A is a major determinant of A_Vuln. Nevertheless, the degree of nonuniformity of AERP appears to be less important as an electrophysiological substrate for AF due to focal activation.     

Increased dispersion and shortened refractoriness caused by verapamil in chronic atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess the effect ofverapamil on atrial fibrillation (AF) cycle length and spatial dispersion of refractoriness in patients with chronic AF. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that verapamil prevents acute remodeling by AF. The effects of verapamil in chronic AF are unknown. METHODS: During electrophysiologic study in 15 patients with chronic AF (duration >1 year), 12 unipolar electrograms were recorded from right atrial free wall, right atrial appendage and coronary sinus, along with monophasic action potential recordings from the right atrial appendage. The mean fibrillatory interval at each atrial recording site was used as an index for local refractoriness. Dispersion of refractoriness was calculated as the standard deviation of all local mean fibrillatory intervals expressed as a percentage of the overall mean fibrillatory interval. After baseline measurements, verapamil (0.075 mg/kg intravenous in 10 min) was infused and the measurements were repeated. RESULTS: After administration ofverapamil, mean fibrillatory intervals shortened by a mean of 16.6 +/- 3.3 ms (p < 0.001) at the right free wall, 15.0 +/- 3.5 ms (p < 0.001) at the appendage and 17.1 +/- 3.2 ms (p < 0.01) in the coronary sinus. Monophasic action potential duration decreased by 15.9 +/- 4.0 ms (p < 0.01). Dispersion of refractoriness increased in all patients from 3.8 +/- 0.8 to 5.1 +/- 1.8 (p < 0.001). A strong correlation between mean fibrillatory intervals and action potential duration was found, both before and after verapamil. CONCLUSIONS: Verapamil caused shortening of refractoriness and increase in spatial dispersion of refractoriness in patients with chronic AF. This implies that verapamil is not useful in reversing the remodeling process in these patients.     

Novel electrophysiologic parameter of dispersion of atrial repolarization: comparison of different atrial pacing methods

INTRODUCTION: Heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization plays a major role in reentrant tachyarrhythmias in cardiac tissue. However, the role of atrial repolarization added activation time (AT) to refractoriness in atrial vulnerability has not been investigated in detail. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 34 patients: 18 with atrial fibrillation (AF) and 16 without AF (control group). The effective refractory periods (ERPs) in the right atrial appendage, low lateral right atrium, high right septum, and distal coronary sinus, and ATs from P wave onset to each electrogram during sinus rhythm and right atrial appendage, low lateral right atrial, high right septal, distal coronary sinus, and biatrial pacing were measured. Atrial recovery time, defined as the sum of AT and ERP, and its dispersions during sinus rhythm, right atrial appendage, low lateral right atrial, high right septal, distal coronary sinus, and biatrial pacing were calculated. Both ERP dispersion and atrial recovery time dispersion during sinus rhythm were significantly greater in the AF group than in the control group. Atrial recovery time dispersion during distal coronary sinus, high right septal, or biatrial pacing was significantly smaller than that during right atrial appendage or low lateral right atrial pacing in each group. In particular, atrial recovery time dispersion during distal coronary sinus pacing was the smallest of the five pacing methods in the AF group. P wave duration during biatrial or high right septal pacing was significantly shorter than during right atrial appendage, low lateral right atrial, or distal coronary sinus pacing in each group. CONCLUSION: Atrial recovery time dispersion is suitable as an electrophysiologic parameter of atrial vulnerability. Distal coronary sinus pacing may prevent AF by increasing homogeneity of atrial repolarization, whereas biatrial and high right septal pacing contribute not only homogeneity of atrial repolarization but also improvement of atrial depolarization.     

High-density mapping of spontaneous pulmonary vein activity initiating atrial fibrillation in humans

Introduction: High-density three-dimensional (3D) mapping of the pulmonary vein (PV)-left atrial (LA) junction was performed to characterize spontaneous PV activity in humans.
Methods and Results: The activation patterns of ectopic beats and of the initial 2 seconds of atrial fibrillation (AF) from the PVs were analyzed using a 64-poles basket catheter. A focal mechanism was defined as a discrete site of early and centrifugal activation. Continuous activity was considered as an activation covering ≥80% of the tachycardia beat-to-beat cycle length within the mapping field. In 35 patients, 123 spontaneous focal ectopic beats that did not induce AF and 95 that did induce AF were mapped. The mean coupling interval of ectopic discharges not inducing AF was 281 ± 70 msec versus 236 ± 90 msec for ectopies initiating AF (P ≤ 0.01). The first ectopic activity of all 218 arrhythmogenic events showed exclusively a focal mechanism. During the 95 episodes of AF initiation, one or two ectopic beats from the PVs initiated AF in the LA in 39%, a stable focal tachycardia was recorded in 14%, continuous activity with important changes in cycle length (35 ± 15 msec) suggestive of decremental or fibrillatory conduction was found in 18%, and in 29% the activation pattern could not be classified. No stable and sustained reentrant circuit could be identified by our mapping tool in the PV-LA junction.
Conclusions: Arrhythmogenic activity from PVs in humans is predominantly due to discrete focal activity.     

Acute effects of left atrial radiofrequency ablation on atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Acutely, when left atrial ablation is performed during atrial fibrillation (AF), the AF may persist and require cardioversion, or it may convert to sinus rhythm or to atrial tachycardia/flutter. The prevalence of these acute outcomes has not been described. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left atrial ablation, usually including encirclement of the pulmonary veins, was performed during AF in 144 patients with drug-refractory AF. Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 19 patients (13%), to left atrial tachycardia in 6 (4%), and to atrial flutter in 6 (4%). In the 6 patients with a focal atrial tachycardia, the mean cycle length was 294 +/- 45 ms. The tachycardia arose in the left atrial roof in 3 patients, the left atrial appendage in 2, and the anterior left atrium in 1. In 3 of 6 patients, the focal atrial tachycardia originated in an area that displayed a relatively short cycle length during AF. In 6 patients, AF converted to macroreentrant atrial flutter with a mean cycle length of 253 +/- 47 ms, involving the mitral isthmus in 5 patients and the septum in 1 patient. All atrial tachycardias and flutters were successfully ablated with 1 to 15 applications of radiofrequency energy. CONCLUSION: When left atrial ablation is performed during AF, the AF may convert to atrial tachycardia or flutter in approximately 10% of patients. Focal atrial tachycardias that occur during ablation of AF may be attributable to driving mechanisms that persist after AF has been eliminated, whereas atrial flutter results from incomplete ablation lines.     

Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: critical structures for termination

BACKGROUND: The relative contributions of different atrial regions to the maintenance of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are not known. METHODS: Sixty patients (53 +/- 9 years) undergoing catheter ablation of persistent AF (17 +/- 27 months) were studied. Ablation was performed in a randomized sequence at different left atrial (LA) regions and comprised isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV), isolation of other thoracic veins, and atrial tissue ablation targeting all regions with rapid or heterogeneous activation or guided by activation mapping. Finally, linear ablation at the roof and mitral isthmus was performed if sinus rhythm was not restored after addressing the above-mentioned areas. The impact of ablation was evaluated by the effect on the fibrillatory cycle length in the coronary sinus and appendages at each step. Activation mapping and entrainment maneuvers were used to define the mechanisms and locations of intermediate focal or macroreentrant atrial tachycardias. RESULTS: AF terminated in 52 patients (87%), directly to sinus rhythm in 7 or via the ablation of 1-6 intermediate atrial tachycardias (total 87) in 45 patients. This conversion was preceded by prolongation of fibrillatory cycle length by 39 +/- 9 msec, with the greatest magnitude occurring during ablation at the anterior LA, coronary sinus and PV-LA junction. Thirty-eight atrial tachycardias were focal (originating dominantly from these same sites), while 49 were macroreentrant (involving the mitral or cavotricuspid isthmus or LA roof). Patients without AF termination displayed shorter fibrillatory cycles at baseline: 130 +/- 14 vs 156 +/- 23 msec; P = 0.002. CONCLUSION: Termination of persistent AF can be achieved in 87% of patients by catheter ablation. Ablation of the structures annexed to the left atrium-the left atrial appendage, coronary sinus, and PVs-have the greatest impact on the prolongation of AF cycle length, the conversion of AF to atrial tachycardia, and the termination of focal atrial tachycardias.     

Interatrial transseptal electrical conduction: comparison of patients with atrial fibrillation and normal controls

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzed the electrophysiologic properties of interatrial transseptal electrical conduction at Bachmann's bundle and the ostium of the coronary sinus (CS os) in response to pulmonary vein (PV) stimuli, which mimicked spontaneous ectopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) referred for ablation (15 persistent AF and 25 paroxysmal AF) and 15 control patients were enrolled in the study. During decremental extra-stimulus pacing from the PVs, right atrial activation was analyzed using noncontact mapping and multipolar catheters. The refractory periods and conduction times were calculated for Bachmann's bundle, CS os, and left atrium. The dispersion of refractoriness was calculated as the difference between the refractory periods of Bachmann's bundle and the CS os. The refractory period at Bachmann's bundle was 244 msec in the persistent AF group, 213 msec in the paroxysmal AF group, and 199 msec for controls. The refractory period at the CS os was 220 msec in the persistent AF group, 201 msec in the paroxysmal AF group, and 193 msec for controls. The dispersion of refractoriness was 54 msec in the persistent AF group; this was significantly greater than in paroxysmal AF at 32 msec (P < 0.05) and controls at 13 msec (P < 0.01). During decremental pacing, lengthening of conduction times at both Bachmann's bundle and the CS os were significantly greater in the persistent AF group compared with paroxysmal AF or control groups. A higher dispersion of refractoriness was associated with a higher incidence of inducible AF and a lower rate of ablation success. CONCLUSION: There are differences between the left to right interatrial electrical connections between patients with persistent AF, paroxysmal AF and controls.     

Prevalence and significance of focal sources of atrial arrhythmia in patients undergoing cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Recent reports have high-lighted the importance of focal atrial arrhythmias as a curable cause for a group of patients with frequently recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The importance of this arrhythmia mechanism in the general population of patients with persistent AF is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: After successful internal cardioversion of 50 consecutive patients with persistent AF (mean age 60 years, mean duration of AF 26 months), endocardial activity in the immediate postcardioversion period was analyzed for the presence of focal atrial activity. Postcardioversion atrial arrhythmias were considered to be focal if there was evidence of a localized source of repetitive early atrial activation, either in the form of (1) self-terminating monomorphic atrial tachycardia (at least five beats) or (2) recurrences of AF with an initial atrial activation sequence (first five beats) that was both monomorphic and reproducible with repeated recurrences. Evidence for a focal atrial arrhythmia was present in 20 of the total group of 50 patients (40%). Multivariate analysis of clinical characteristics revealed the diagnosis of lone AF as the only independent predictor of a focal source of AF (P = 0.028). Thirty-nine patients were discharged from hospital in sinus rhythm. At 1-month follow-up, 25 (64%) of these 39 patients had suffered AF recurrence. The only significant predictor of AF recurrence was evidence of a focal source of atrial arrhythmia immediately after cardioversion, with a relative risk of 1.73 (range 1.1 to 2.7; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Focal atrial arrhythmias are common in patients presenting with "idiopathic" persistent AF, suggesting a possible causative role in the generation of this common arrhythmia.     

Evidence of mechanoelectric feedback in the atria of patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Objective Patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) could serve as a clinical model to study the effects of mechanical stretch in the electrical properties of atrial myocardium.Materials and methods We studied 14 patients with AVNRT. Peak, mean and minimal atrial pressures, atrial refractoriness (ERP) in the right atrial appendage and high right atrial lateral wall and monophasic action potential duration at 90% of repolarisation (MAPd90) in the right atrial appendage were assessed during atrial pacing at 500 and 400 ms and after 2 min of pacing at the tachycardia cycle length. Measurements were repeated from the same positions after ventricular pacing at the same cycle lengths and after 2 min of tachycardia. Susceptibility to atrial fibrillation (AF) was assessed by noting whether AF was induced during ERP evaluation.Results Atrial pressure showed a statistically significant increase during ventricular pacing compared to baseline. This increase remained substantially unchanged when the tachycardia was induced. A significant reduction in atrial ERP and MAPd90 was also observed during ventricular pacing at all cycle lengths compared to atrial pacing. Two minutes of spontaneous tachycardia were enough to change the atrial ERP and MAPd90 to values significantly lower than those during atrial pacing at the cycle length of tachycardia. During the ERP evaluation AF was induced more often during the tachycardia (28%) than during ventricular (14%) and atrial pacing (0%).Conclusion In AVNRT patients, ventricular pacing and reentrant tachycardia significantly increase right atrial pressures and subsequently shorten ERP and MAPd90, leading to an enhanced propensity for AF.     

Inducibility of atrial fibrillation during atrioventricular pacing with varying intervals: role of atrial electrophysiology and the autonomic nervous system

INTRODUCTION: Patients receiving VVI pacemakers have a higher incidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) than those receiving DDD pacemakers. However, the mechanism behind the difference is not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether atrial electrophysiology and the autonomic nervous system play a role in the occurrence of AF during AV pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 28 patients who had (group I, n = 15) or did not have (group II, n = 13) AF induced by a single extrastimulus during pacing with different AV intervals. Atrial pressure, atrial size, atrial effective refractory periods, and atrial dispersion were evaluated during pacing with different AV intervals. Twenty-four-hour heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity also were examined. Atrial pressure, atrial size, effective refractory periods in the right posterolateral atrium and distal coronary sinus, and atrial dispersion increased as the AV interval shortened from 160 to 0 msec. During AV pacing, group I patients had greater minimal (52+/-17 vs 25+/-7 msec; P < 0.005) and maximal (76+/-16 vs 36+/-9 msec; P < 0.005) atrial dispersion than group II patients. The differences in atrial size and atrial dispersion among different AV intervals were greater in patients with AF than in those without AF. Baroreflex sensitivity (6.6+/-1.7 vs 3.9+/-1.0; P < 0.00005), but not heart rate variability, was higher in patients with AF than in those without AF. CONCLUSION: Abnormal atrial electrophysiology and higher vagal reflex activity can play important roles in the genesis of AF in patients receiving pacemakers.     

Mechanisms for atrial fibrillation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

INTRODUCTION: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) frequently occurs in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. To elucidate the mechanisms for PAF, we performed electrophysiologic studies (EPS) before and after ablation of accessory pathways (APs). METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated 24 patients with WPW syndrome who had AV reciprocating tachycardia and prior PAF and had undergone successful ablation of APs. Patients in whom atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced by EPS at day 7 after ablation were considered the inducible AF group (n = 14), and patients in whom AF was not induced by EPS at day 7 after ablation were considered the noninducible AF group (n = 10). Fifteen patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) but without PAF who underwent ablation of the slow AV nodal pathways served as the control group (AVNRT group). Maximal atrial conduction delay and conduction delay zone, which are indices of atrial vulnerability, were measured before and after ablation. Before ablation, maximal atrial conduction delay and conduction delay zone were significantly greater (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively) in the two WPW syndrome groups than in the AVNRT group, indicating increased atrial vulnerability in WPW syndrome with PAF. After ablation, these parameters did not change in the inducible AF group, whereas they were significantly (P < 0.0001) decreased in the noninducible AF group and were not different from those in the AVNRT group, indicating normalized atrial vulnerability in the noninducible AF group after ablation. The prospective study demonstrated that PAF recurred only in the inducible AF group during long-term follow-up (17+/-7 months). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that there are two mechanisms of PAF in patients with WPW syndrome: one mechanism is reversible and AP-dependent atrial vulnerability, and the other is intrinsic and AP-independent atrial vulnerability.     

Catheter Ablation of Inducible Atrial Flutter, in Combination with Atrial Pacing and Antiarrhythmic Drugs (“Hybrid Therapy”) Improves Rhythm Control in Patients with Refractory Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial flutter or tachycardia may coexist with atrial fibrillation [AF] and can be treated with ablation techniques in attempt to reduce the total AF burden. The role of ablation of latent atrial tachyarrhythmias elicited at electrophysiologic study in conjunction with atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with refractory AF has not been evaluated. We evaluated the efficacy of catheter ablation of electrically induced atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia in improving rhythm control in patients with refractory AF. Methods: Consecutive patients with refractory AF, and spontaneous atrial flutter (Group 1) or without spontaneous atrial flutter (Group 2) underwent programmed stimulation in a baseline drug-free state. All patients had electrically induced atrial flutter or tachycardia. Radiofrequency ablation of the arrhythmia substrate was performed in all patients. Primary endpoints evaluated for patient outcome in both groups included maintenance of rhythm control and freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias. Results: Forty-three patients, with a mean age of 66±13 years were studied. Group 1 consisted of 22 patients while Group 2 had 21 patients. Ablation of the tricuspid valve-inferior venacaval isthmus was performed in 41 patients who had common atrial flutter induced at electrophysiologic study. Ablation of other atrial sites was performed in 8 patients with induced atypical flutter and 4 patients with induced atrial tachycardia. Ten of these patients had ablation of more than one arrhythmia. 17 patients (40%) had atrial pacing instituted and 28 patients remained on a class 1/3 antiarrhythmic drug. During a mean follow-up of 26±14 months, 33 patients (82.5%) remained in rhythm control. Actuarial analysis showed 96% of patients in rhythm control at 6 months, 94% at 12 months, and 90% at 24 months. Freedom from symptomatic AF recurrence was 64% at 6 months, 58% at 12 months, and 42% at 24 months. The outcome for both of these endpoints was similar for Group 1 and Group 2 (p = NS). The AF free interval increased significantly from 7±9 days to 172±121 days (p < 0.01) after ablation. This increase was again similar in both the groups. In the 14 patients were who did not receive atrial pacing and who remained on the same class 1/3 antiarrhythmic drug, the AF free interval increased from 18±17 days to 212±102 days (p < 0.01). Conclusions: We conclude that electrophysiologic studies can elicit latent atrial flutter or tachycardia in patients with refractory AF without spontaneous monomorphic atrial tachyarrhythmias. Catheter ablation of electrically induced atrial flutter or tachycardia either alone, or with atrial pacing and with antiarrhythmic drug may improve rhythm control and reduce AF recurrences. This is similar in patients with and without spontaneous atrial flutter and refractory AF.     

Conduction characteristics at the crista terminalis during onset of pulmonary vein atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Focal atrial fibrillation (AF) may initiate with an irregular rapid burst of atrial ectopic (AE) activity from a pulmonary vein (PV) focus, but how AF is maintained it is not known. The crista terminalis (CT) is an important line of block in atrial flutter (AFL), but its role in AF has not been determined. The aim of this study was to examine the conduction properties of the CT during onset of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 10 patients (mean age 38 +/- 8 years), we analyzed conduction across the CT during onset of focal AF from an arrhythmogenic PV and during pacing from the same PV at cycle lengths of 700 and 300 ms. A 20-pole catheter was positioned on the CT using intracardiac echocardiography. In 10 control patients with no history of AF, we analyzed conduction across the CT during pacing from the distal coronary sinus at 700 and 300 ms. In all 10 AF patients, AF was initiated with 1 to 9 AE beats (median 5) from a PV. During sinus rhythm, there were no split components (SC) recorded on the CT. During PV AE activity, discrete SC were recorded on the CT in all patients over 6.3 +/- 0.9 bipoles (3.7 +/- 0.3 cm). Maximal splitting of SC was 66 +/- 31 ms (37-139). There was an inverse relationship between AE coupling intervals and the degree of splitting between SC in all patients. Degeneration to AF was preceded by progressive decrement across the CT. SC were recorded during PV pacing at 700 and 300 ms (maximal distance between SC of 24 +/- 3 ms and 43 +/- 5 ms, respectively, P < 0.001). Maximum SC at CT in controls was 13 +/- 8 ms at 700 ms (P = 0.06 vs AF patients) and 16 +/- 9 ms at 300 ms (P < 0.01 vs AF patients). CONCLUSION: (1) These observations provide evidence of anisotropic, decremental conduction across the CT during onset of focal AF and during pacing from the same PV. A line of functional conduction block develops along this anatomic structure (CT). Whether this line of block acts as an initiator of AF or simply contributes passively to nonuniform fibrillatory conduction is unknown. (2) In some patients with focal AF, development of conduction block along the CT may provide a substrate for typical AFL.     

Long‐Term Outcome Following Successful Catheter Ablation of Atrial Tachycardia Originating From the Pulmonary Veins: Absence of Late Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation and Pulmonary Vein Tachycardia . Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the long‐term outcome and incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients following catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia (AT) from the pulmonary veins (PV). Background: Although both AT and AF may originate from ectopic foci within PVs, it is unknown whether PV AT patients subsequently develop AF. Methods: Twenty‐eight patients with 29 PV ATs (14%) from a consecutive series of 194 patients who underwent RFA for focal AT were included. Patients with concomitant AF prior to the index procedure were excluded. Results: The minimum follow‐up duration was 4 years; mean age 38 ± 18 years with symptoms for 6.5 ± 10 years, having tried 1.5 ± 0.9 antiarrhythmic drugs. The distribution of foci was: left superior 12 (41%), right superior 10 (34%), left inferior 5 (17%), and right inferior 2 (7%). The focus was ostial in 93% and 2–4 cm distally within the vein in 7%. Mean tachycardia cycle length was 364 ± 90 ms. Focal ablation was performed in 25 of 28 patients. There were 6 recurrences with 5 from the original site. Twenty‐six patients were available for long‐term clinical follow‐up. At a mean of 7.2 ± 2.1 years, 25 of 26 (96%) were free from recurrence off antiarrhythmic drugs. No patients developed AF. Conclusions: Focal ablation for tachycardia originating from the PVs is associated with long‐term freedom from both AT and AF. Therefore, although PV AT and PV AF share a common anatomic distribution, PV AT is a distinct clinical entity successfully treated with focal RFA and not associated with AF in the long term. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 747‐750, July 2010)     

持续性心房颤动经导管射频消融治疗的方法探讨(附三例报告)

探讨经导管射频消融治疗持续性心房颤动 (简称房颤 )的可行性。 3例房颤患者房颤持续时间 2个月至 1年4个月。术前口服胺碘酮 ,1例转为窦性心律伴频发房性早搏 (简称房早 ) ,1例转为房早与短阵房颤和阵发心房扑动 (简称房扑 ) ,1例转为房早与阵发房性心动过速 (简称房速 )。经导管作点状消融或点状消融加房扑线性消融 ,2例术中房早消失 ,1例房早显著减少 ,经快速心房刺激或静脉点滴异丙肾上腺素均不能诱发房颤。 1例术后有短阵房颤发作 ,服用莫雷西嗪 ,房颤未再发作。结论 :某些持续性房颤用药物后可转复成窦性心律伴频发房早、房扑或房速 ,局部单点消融或单点消融加线性消融可以达到治疗目的。     

Role of the coronary sinus in maintenance of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Bursts of tachycardia arising in the pulmonary veins may play an important role in perpetuating atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the role of the coronary sinus (CS) in the perpetuation of AF has been unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether the CS plays a role in perpetuation of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary vein isolation was performed by segmental ostial ablation with radiofrequency energy in 22 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF. Bipolar and unipolar electrograms recorded in the left atrium and CS were analyzed during atrial pacing from the mitral annulus and during AF. There was a mean of 2.5 +/- 0.5 electrical connections between the CS and the left atrium. The electrical connections between the left atrium and CS were ablated with a mean of 6.2 +/- 2.7 minutes of radiofrequency energy applied along the atrial side of the inferior mitral annulus. During AF, episodes of intermittent tachycardia alternated between the left atrium and the CS. Among the 22 patients, sustained AF was still inducible in 9 after pulmonary vein isolation. After electrical disconnection of the CS from the left atrium, sustained AF was inducible in only 3 of these 9 patients. CONCLUSION: The CS may be a source of rapid repetitive electrical activity during AF. The lower probability of inducible sustained AF after electrical disconnection of the CS from the left atrium suggests that the CS may play a role in perpetuating AF.