Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is highly effective in relapsed and refractory myeloma patients but responses are short‐lived

Objectives: Bortezomib has proven to be effective as single agent in myeloma patients. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone in a cohort of multiple myeloma (MM) relapsed/refractory patients treated in a single center. Patients and Methods: In this single center study, 70 patients were treated with bortezomib alone (9) or in combination with dexamethasone (61). Results: Forty‐one patients (59%) achieved at least a partial response (PR), including 7% complete response (CR), 36% very good partial response (VGPR) reaching the best response within four cycles. The duration of response was significantly longer for patients achieving CR/VGPR than for those achieving PR (7.3 vs. 3.8 months, P = 0.03). Likewise, time to progression, time to alternative treatment, and treatment free interval were significantly better for patients obtaining CR/VGPR (6.8, 9.4, 6.5 months respectively) as compared with PR (4.9, 6.3, 2 months respectively). The only dose‐limiting toxicity was peripheral neuropathy (PN), which occurred in 38/70 patients (55%) and was of grade 3–4 in 12 (17%). PN led to a dose reduction or treatment discontinuation in 17 (24%) patients. Complete resolution or improvement of PN occurred in 29/38 (76%) after a median time of 100 d (range: 17–202). Conclusions: Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone is highly effective in relapsed/refractory MM producing an impressive rate of CR/VGPR, but responses are short‐lived.     

Bendamustine,lenalidomide and dexamethasone (BRd) has high activity as 2nd‐line therapy for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma – a phase II trial

The combination of lenalidomide (Revlimid^®, R) and dexamethasone (d) is a standard regimen for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM ). With this regimen, only a small fraction of patients will achieve high quality responses [≥ very good partial response (VGPR )]. The combination of bendamustine (B), lenalidomide and dexamethasone (BR d) has shown high efficacy in patients with advanced rrMM . However, dose‐limiting haematotoxicity restricted its use in extensively pre‐treated patient populations. This prospective, multicentre Phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BR d in rrMM patients with one prior line of therapy. Fifty patients were enrolled (median age 68·5 years [range 46–83]) and were treated with B 75 mg/m² days 1, 2; R 25 mg days 1–21 and d (40/20 mg) days 1, 8, 15 and 22, for 6 28‐day induction cycles, followed by 12 cycles with Rd alone. Pegfilgrastim was administered according to protocol‐defined criteria. The study aimed to demonstrate a complete response (CR )/VGPR rate of >40% after induction therapy. Of 45 evaluable patients, 23 (51%) achieved a CR /VGPR . Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurred in 17 (34%) and 8 (16%) of patients, respectively. BR d is a safe and efficacious regimen as a second line treatment for rrMM , leading to high quality responses in a considerable proportion of patients.     

Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in myeloma refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide: comparison of 2 dosing strategies in dual-refractory disease

Pomalidomide at doses of 2 or 4 mg/d has demonstrated excellent activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We opened 2 sequential phase 2 trials using the pomalidomide with weekly dexamethasone (Pom/dex) regimen at differing doses to study the efficacy of this regimen in patients who have failed both lenalidomide and bortezomib. Pomalidomide was given orally 2 or 4 mg daily with dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in each cohort. Confirmed responses in the 2-mg cohort consisted of very good partial response (VGPR) in 5 (14%), partial response (PR) in 4 (11%), minor response (MR) in 8 (23%) for an overall response rate of 49%. In the 4-mg cohort, confirmed responses consisted of complete response (CR) in 1 (3%), VGPR in 3 (9%), PR in 6 (17%), MR in 5 (14%) for an overall response rate of 43%. Overall survival at 6 months is 78% and 67% in the 2- and 4-mg cohort, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. This nonrandomized data suggests no advantage for 4 mg over the 2 mg daily. Pomalidomide overcomes resistance in myeloma refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib. This trial is registered at http://ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00558896.     

The relationship between quality of response and clinical benefit for patients treated on the bortezomib arm of the international, randomized, phase 3 APEX trial in relapsed multiple myeloma

Quality of response is associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. This cohort study within the phase 3 Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions (APEX) trial of bortezomib versus dexamethasone in relapsed myeloma assessed the relationship between quality of response to bortezomib (n = 315) and clinical benefit. Treatment-free interval (TFI), time to alternative therapy (TTAT), time to progression (TTP) and OS were assessed in response-evaluable patients in the bortezomib arm in cohorts defined by achievement of complete response (CR; n = 27), very good partial response (VGPR; n = 31), partial response (PR; n = 77), minimal response (MR; n = 21) or non-response (NR, including stable and progressive disease; n = 159). CR was associated with significantly longer median TFI (24.1 vs. 6.9/6.4 months) and TTAT (27.1 vs. 13.6/14 months) versus VGPR/PR. Median TTP was similar in CR, VGPR and PR cohorts; median OS was not reached. Patients achieving MR appeared to have prolonged median TFI (3.8 vs. 2.3 months), TTAT (8.7 vs. 6.2 months), TTP (4.9 vs. 2.8 months) and OS (24.9 vs. 18.7 months) versus NR. In conclusion, bortezomib had substantial activity in relapsed myeloma patients; CR may be a surrogate marker for significant clinical benefit with bortezomib. MR appeared to be valid as a separate response category in this setting.     

Clarithromycin (Biaxin)‐lenalidomide‐low‐dose dexamethasone (BiRd) versus lenalidomide‐low‐dose dexamethasone (Rd) for newly diagnosed myeloma

The objective of this case‐matched study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of the addition of clarithromycin (Biaxin) to lenalidomide/low‐dose dexamethasone (BiRd) vs. lenalidomide/low‐dose dexamethasone (Rd) for newly diagnosed myeloma. Data from 72 patients treated at the New York Presbyterian Hospital‐Cornell Medical Center were retrospectively compared with an equal number of matched pair mates selected among patients seen at the Mayo Clinic who received Rd. Case matching was blinded and was performed according to age, gender, and transplant status. On intention‐to‐treat analysis, complete response (45.8% vs. 13.9%, P < 0.001) and very‐good‐partial‐response or better (73.6% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher with BiRd. Time‐to‐progression (median 48.3 vs. 27.5 months, P = 0.071), and progression‐free survival (median 48.3 vs. 27.5 months, P = 0.044) were higher with BiRd. There was a trend toward better OS with BiRd (3‐year OS: 89.7% vs. 73.0%, P = 0.170). Main grade 3–4 toxicities of BiRd were hematological, in particular thrombocytopenia (23.6% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.012). Infections (16.7% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.218) and dermatological toxicity (12.5% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.129) were higher with Rd. Results of this case‐matchedanalysis suggest that there is significant additive value when clarithromycin is added to Rd. Randomized phase III trials are needed to confirm these results. Am. J. Hematol., 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Long-term prognostic significance of response in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation

For establishing the true effect of different response categories in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with autologous stem cell transplantation, we evaluated, after a median follow-up of 153 months, 344 patients with MM who received a transplant between 1989 and 1998. Overall survival (OS) at 12 years was 35% in complete response (CR) patients, 22% in near complete response (nCR), 16% in very good partial response (VGPR), and 16% in partial response (PR) groups. Significant differences in OS and progression-free survival were found between CR and nCR groups (P = .01 and P = .002, respectively), between CR and VGPR groups (P = .0001 and P = .003), or between CR and PR groups (P = .003 and P = < 10(-5)); no differences were observed between the nCR and VGPR groups (P = .2 and P = .9) or between these groups and the PR group (P = .1 and P = .8). A landmark study found a plateau phase in OS after 11 years; 35% patients in the CR group and 11% in the nCR+VGPR+PR group are alive at 17 years; 2 cases had relapsed in the nCR+VGPR+PR group. In conclusion, MM achieving CR after autologous stem cell transplantation is a central prognostic factor. The relapse rate is low in patients with > 11 years of follow-up, possibly signifying a cure for patients in CR.     

Outcomes of young adults (aged ≤ 40 years) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after up-front autologous stem cell transplant

Multiple myeloma (MM) primarily affects older patients. There are scarce data on the outcomes of young adults undergoing autologous transplantation (auto-HCT). In this single-centre analysis, we included 117 younger patients, with a median age of 37 years (range 22–40) at transplant. Seventeen (15%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics. Before transplant, 10% of patients achieved ≥CR and 44% achieved ≥VGPR. At best post-transplant response, 56% and 77% of patients achieved ≥CR and ≥VGPR respectively. With a median follow-up for survivors of 72.6 months (range 0.9–238.0), median PFS and OS were 43.1 months (95% CI 31.2–65.0) and 146.6 months (95% CI 100.0–208.1) respectively. Patients who underwent auto-HCT after 2010 had better median PFS (84.9 months vs. 28.2 months, p < 0.001) and OS (NR vs. 91.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with those transplanted earlier. In multi-variate analysis, achieving ≥CR as best post-transplant response was associated with improved PFS (HR [95% CI] 0.55 [0.32–0.95], p = 0.032), while achieving ≥VGPR was predictive of superior OS (0.32 [0.16–0.62], p < 0.001). Three patients (3%) developed a second primary malignancy. Younger MM patients had durable survival after auto-HCT, which further improved after the availability of novel anti-myeloma drugs in recent years. Depth of response following transplant remains a key predictor of survival.     

Bendamustine,lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (BRD) is highly effective with durable responses in relapsed multiple myeloma

Bendamustine is a multifunctional alkylating agent with single agent activity in myeloma. We designed the current phase 1/2 trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of bendamustine that can be safely combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone and to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination. Patients with relapsed MM following at least 1 prior therapy, but no more than four lines of prior therapy and with measurable disease were enrolled. Bendamustine 75 mg/m² given on days 1 and 2, lenalidomide 25 mg given days 1–21 and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, was the recommended Phase 2 dose. Seventy‐one patients were accrued: 21 on Phase 1 and 50 on Phase 2. The median age was 62.3 years; patients had a median of three prior lines of therapy (range 1–4), with over 70% of the patients having received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and/or peripheral blood stem cell transplant. Thirty‐four of 70 (49%) patients had a confirmed partial response or better, including 20 patients (29%) with a very good partial response or better. An additional 4 patients had a minor response, translating to an overall 55% clinical benefit rate. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was seen in 96% of patients, with ≥grade 3 hematologic in 94% and nonhematologic in 50%. The median progression free survival was 11.8 months and the median duration of response was 23 months. The combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is very effective in relapsed multiple myeloma with high response rates and durable responses Am. J. Hematol. 90:1106–1110, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission is associated with better progression-free survival in multiple myeloma

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is standard consolidation therapy in management of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We reviewed records of all consecutive MM patients who underwent ASCT with high-dose melphalan at our center from year 2002 to 2016. A total of 141 ASCT were conducted (90 males and 51 females) with median age of 55 years (23–68 years). Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 7 months (3–79), with majority of patients underwent transplant in first remission, while 17 (12%) patients received transplant beyond first remission. Eighty-three percent patients obtained CR/VGPR post-ASCT. Transplant-related mortality was 2.1%. At a median follow up of 54 months, mean overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) group were 128.3 months (95% C.I. 111.9–144.7 months) and 73.8 months (95% C.I. 57.7–89.9 months), respectively. On univariate analysis, OS was adversely affected by renal insufficiency (p?=?0.024), while OS was better with CR/VGPR post-ASCT (p?<?0.001) and lenalidomide maintenance therapy (p?=?0.009). PFS was affected by CR/VGPR pre-ASCT (p?=?0.021), CR/VGPR post-ASCT (p?<?0.001), and transplant in first remission (p?=?0.034). On multivariate analysis, lenalidomide maintenance (versus thalidomide) (p?=?0.007) and CR/VGPR response post-ASCT (p?=?0.0003) were found to be predictors for better OS and CR/VGPR response at transplant for better PFS (p?=?0.038). Transplant in first remission versus beyond first remission showed a trend for better PFS (p?=?0.073). Conclusion: Majority of patients obtained CR/VGPR post-ASCT. Longer PFS was seen with patients who were transplanted in first remission.     

Bortezomib plus intermediate‐dose dexamethasone and thalidomide in elderly untreated patients with multiple myeloma: A Chinese experience

Bortezomib has proven to be active in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), including elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib in combination with intermediate‐dose dexamethasone (Dex) and thalidomide in untreated MM patients aged ≥65 years in a Chinese single center. In this study, 18 patients were treated with bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m² IV on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and Dex at 20 mg/day IV on Days 1–4 and 8–11 simultaneously. Thalidomide at dose of 100 mg/day was given everyday. The mean number of cycles of bortezomib treatment was 2.06. Three patients (17%) achieved a complete response (CR), four (22%) a very good partial response (VGPR), and nine (50%) a PR, resulting in an overall response rate of 89%. The median time to response was 22 days (range 14–50 days). The duration of response was significantly longer in patients achieving a CR/VGPR with respect to those achieving only a PR (8.5 vs. 4.2 months, P = 0.03). Grade 3–4 toxicities occurring in patients comprised weakness, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, infection, and neuropathy. Only one patient suffered from deep vein thrombosis. This preliminary experience in Chinese patients indicated that bortezomib‐Dex‐thalidomide is highly effective in elderly untreated patients with MM, even in patients with poor prognostic features. Am. J. Hematol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Dose escalation therapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma following Z-Dex induction treatment

A phase I-II study of high-dose (HD) alkylating agents in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma after maximum response to Z-Dex (idarubicin, dexamethasone) therapy and DHAP (cisplatin, HD cytosine arabinoside, dexamethasone), stem cell mobilization is reported. Twenty-six patients, median age 56 years (range 42-66), completed Z-Dex chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were mobilized with DHAP. Patients then preceded to cyclophosphamide (HD Cy: 6 g/m(2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor followed by busulphan-melphalan-conditioned PBSC autograft. Interferon alpha was introduced at 3 months post transplant as maintenance therapy. Six patients failed to complete the full protocol. Median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 8 months (range 6-12). Mean CD34+ cell dose collected was 15.8 x 10(6)/kg (CI 11.8, 19.8). Median time from DHAP to HD-Cy was 6 weeks (range 4-12) and from HD-Cy to transplant was 8 weeks (range 6-12). The median follow-up was 36 months (range 6-63). On an intent-to-treat basis, the response rates were three complete response (CR, 12%), 21 partial response (PR, 80%) and two stable disease (SD, 8%) post Z-Dex, five CR (19%) and 21 PR (81%) post HD-Cy, and 14 CR (54%) and 12 PR (46%) post transplant. The treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 4% (1 patient). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) have not been reached; estimated values were 60 and 48 months respectively. The 3-year OS and PFS were 72% and 62%. Actuarial 5-year OS and event-free survival were 49% and 32%. DHAP produces effective PBSC mobilization and sequential HD therapy, including autologous PBSCT, in patients who received Z-Dex; this offers significant durable disease response rates with acceptable TRM.     

The addition of cyclophosphamide to lenalidomide and dexamethasone in multiply relapsed/refractory myeloma patients; a phase I/II study

We report the results of a Phase I/II dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide when combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Thirty‐one patients were enrolled in cohorts of 3, at five dose levels of cyclophosphamide to a maximum of 700 mg on days 1 and 8 of a 28‐d cycle. Patients received lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21 and dexamethasone 20 mg orally days 1–4 and 8–11. The MTD was 600 mg cyclophosphamide, days 1 and 8. Grade 3/4 haematological complications occurred in 26% of patients, grade 3/4 infection in 3% (both at 700 mg cyclophosphamide), with thromboembolic complications in 6% of patients. Overall complete response (CR) rate was 29%, very good partial response rate 7% and partial response rate 45% giving an overall response rate of 81%. After 21 months median follow‐up, projected 2‐year progression‐free survival was 56%, with 80% overall survival at 30 months. Ten further patients were treated at MTD with a 40% CR rate. No dose reductions for any study drugs or deaths occurred during cycles 1–9. Lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is a safe, effective combination in relapsed myeloma inducing a high response rate, warranting further investigation in phase III trials.     

Short progression-free survival predicts for poor overall survival in older patients with multiple myeloma treated upfront with novel agent-based therapy

Objectives: To assess the importance of the quality of response and of early relapse in unselected elderly patients with myeloma treated upfront with novel agents. Methods: We analyzed 135 unselected transplant‐ineligible patients older than 65 yr who were treated upfront with novel agent‐based regimens in a single center. Results: On intent to treat, 81% of patients achieved a response (28% sCR/CR, 23% VGPR, and 30% PR). Median progression‐free survival (PFS) for patients who achieved sCR/CR was 31 vs. 20 months for VGPR and 23 months for PR (P = 0.048). Median overall survival (OS) for patients with sCR/CR was 62 months, 53 months for VGPR and 38 months for patients with PR (P = 0.028). Early relapse (PFS < 12 months) was more common in patients with PR (39% vs. 21% for VGPR vs. 3% for sCR/CR). Patients who relapsed or progressed <12 months from initiation of treatment had a median OS of 15.4 months compared with 53 months (P < 0.001) for patients who had a PFS > 12 months despite the fact that after relapse or progression most patients were treated again with novel agents. In multivariate analysis, short PFS was the most significant adverse prognostic factor affecting OS, associated with a 7.25‐fold (P < 0.0001) increase in the risk of death. Conclusion: In newly diagnosed patients over 65 yr, treated upfront with novel agents achievement of CR and a PFS ≥12 months is associated with improved outcome. Patients who fail to respond or experience early relapse after primary therapy with novel agent‐based regimens should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials of novel agents and combinations.     

Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin,low‐dose dexamethasone,and lenalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Our previous phase I/II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), low‐dose dexamethasone, and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma showed an overall response rate of 75%, with 29% achieving ≥ VGPR. Here, we investigated this combination (PLD 30 or 40 mg/m² intravenously, day 1; dexamethasone 40 mg orally, days 1–4; lenalidomide 25 mg orally, days 1–21; administered every 28 days) in a phase II study in patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma to determine its efficacy and tolerability ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00617591). At best response, patients could proceed with high‐dose melphalan or with maintenance lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In 57 patients, we found that the overall response rate and rate of very good partial response and better on intent‐to‐treat, our primary endpoints, were 77.2% and 42.1%, respectively, with responses per the International Myeloma Working Group. Median progression‐free survival was 28 months (95% CI 18.1–34.8), with 1‐ and 2‐year overall survival rates of 98.1 and 79.6%. During induction, grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (49.1%), anemia (15.8%), thrombocytopenia (7%), fatigue (14%), febrile neutropenia (8.8%), and venous thromboembolic events (8.8%). During maintenance, grade 3/4 toxicities were mainly hematologic. We found this combination to be active in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, with results comparable to other lenalidomide‐based induction strategies without proteasome inhibition. In addition, maintenance therapy with lenalidomide was well tolerated. Am. J. Hematol. 89:62–67, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Lenalidomide-based response-adapted therapy for older adults without high risk myeloma

Combined lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a standard-of-care therapy for the treatment of older adults with multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide monotherapy has not been evaluated in newly diagnosed myeloma patients. We conducted a phase II study, evaluating a response-adapted therapy for older adults newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma without high-risk features who were ineligible for high-dose therapy and stem cell transplant. Patients were started on single-agent lenalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone was added in the event of progressive disease, in a response-adapted approach. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the International Myeloma Working Group's uniform response criteria were used to assess response and progression. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, and 20 (74%) experienced a partial response or better to this response-adapted therapy. After a median follow-up of 69 months, the median PFS was 36 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 29·8 to not reached], and the median overall survival was 65 months (95% CI, 35·3 to not reached). Grade 3/4 adverse events were mainly haematological in nature. This response-adapted therapy in this patient population is feasible and results in durable responses that compare favourably with concurrent lenalidomide and dexamethasone. These results should be validated in prospective studies.     

Bortezomib therapy alone and in combination with dexamethasone for previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma

Bortezomib, as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone, was examined as first-line treatment in 32 consecutive patients with untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) for a maximum of six 3-week cycles; oral dexamethasone 40 mg was added if a less than partial response (PR) was achieved after two cycles or a less than complete response (CR) was achieved after four cycles. The response rate (CR + PR) was 88%, with undetectable paraprotein (CR) in 6%, and detectable by immunofixation only in 19% [near (n)CR]. All 32 patients completed the first two cycles of bortezomib alone, of whom 3% achieved CR, 9% nCR, and 28% PR. Ten patients received single-agent bortezomib on study, and dexamethasone was added in 22, leading to 15 improved responses. The most common adverse events >/=grade 2 included sensory neuropathy (31%), constipation (28%), myalgia (28%) and fatigue (25%). Sensory neuropathy grade 2 or 3 was reversible within a median of 3 months in five of 10 patients. Bortezomib treatment did not affect stem cell mobilization in eight or transplantation in six patients. Bortezomib alone or in combination with dexamethasone is an effective induction therapy with a high CR and nCR rate and manageable toxicities in previously untreated patients with myeloma.     

Long‐term disease control in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after suspension of lenalidomide therapy

There are no systematic data regarding nonmaintained induction for those patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who do not receive consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation. Of 173 patients with newly diagnosed MM treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (LenDex) as primary therapy, 31 patients had their lenalidomide discontinued for reasons other than progression or alternate therapy. Median progression free survival (PFS) from the time of discontinuing lenalidomide was longer in patients who received lenalidomide ≥1 year (39 vs. 13 months, P < 0.05); there was no difference in PFS for those treated for 1–2 years as compared to ≥2 years. Among those taking lenalidomide for ≥1 year PFS was superior in patients who were in very good partial response (VGPR) or better as compared to those with partial response (48.4 versus 14.8 months, P < 0.05). All patients who progressed and were rechallenged with LenDex responded. These analyses illustrate that discontinuation of lenalidomide after 1 year among those patients achieving a ≥VGPR can result in long‐term disease control. Am. J. Hematol. 89:302–305, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Phase I study of carfilzomib,lenalidomide, vorinostat,and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma

Research has shown that proteasome inhibitors (e.g., carfilzomib), immunomodulatory agents (e.g., lenalidomide), histone deacetylase inhibitors (e.g., vorinostat) and corticosteroids (e.g., dexamethasone) have synergistic anti‐multiple myeloma (MM) activity. This phase I dose‐escalation study evaluated a regimen combining carfilzomib, lenalidomide, vorinostat and dexamethasone (QUAD) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Seventeen patients received carfilzomib (15, 20, or 20/27 mg/m²; 30‐min infusion; days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16), lenalidomide (15 or 25 mg; days 1–21), vorinostat (300 or 400 mg; days 1–7, 15–21), and dexamethasone (40 mg; days 1, 8, 15, 22) in 28‐d cycles. No dose‐limiting toxicities were observed; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The maximum administered dose was carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m², lenalidomide 25 mg, vorinostat 400 mg, and dexamethasone 40 mg. Common grade ≥3 adverse events included neutropenia (53%), thrombocytopenia (53%) and anaemia (41%). The overall response rate was 53%: 12% of patients achieved a very good partial response (PR) and 41% of patients achieved a PR. At a median follow‐up of 10 months, median progression‐free survival was 12 months and median overall survival was not reached. Treatment with QUAD was feasible and had encouraging activity in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM.     

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase 1/2 Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium trial

This phase 1/2 trial evaluated combination lenalidomide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (RVDD) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients received RVDD at 4 dose levels, including the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Patients with a very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) after cycle 4 proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation or continued treatment. The primary objectives were MTD evaluation and response to RVDD after 4 and 8 cycles. Seventy-two patients received a median of 4.5 cycles. The MTDs were lenalidomide 25 mg, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2), and dexamethasone 20/10 mg, as established with 3-week cycles. The most common adverse events were fatigue, constipation, sensory neuropathy, and infection; there was no treatment-related mortality. Response rates after 4 and 8 cycles were 96% and 95% partial response or better, 57% and 65% ≥ VGPR, and 29% and 35% complete or near-complete response, respectively. After a median follow-up of 15.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The estimated 18-month PFS and OS were 80.8% and 98.6%, respectively. RVDD was generally well tolerated and highly active, warranting further study in newly diagnosed MM patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00724568.