Efficacy of wrist/palm warming as an EVA countermeasure to maintain finger comfort in cold conditions

INTRODUCTION: This study explored the effectiveness of local wrist/palm warming as a potential countermeasure for providing finger comfort during extended duration EVA. METHODS: There were six subjects (five males and one female) who were evaluated in a liquid cooling/warming garment (LCWG) wearing modified liquid cooling/warming (LCW) gloves in three different experimental conditions: Condition 1: Stage 1--no LCWG, LCW glove inlet water temperature 33 degrees C; Stage 2--no LCWG, LCW glove inlet water temperature cooled to 8 degrees C; Stage 3--no LCWG, LCW glove inlet water temperature warmed to 45 degrees C; Condition 2: Stage 1--LCWG and LCW glove inlet water temperature 33 degrees C; Stage 2--LCWG inlet temperature cooled to 31 degrees C, LCW gloves, 8 degrees C; Stage 3--LCWG inlet water temperature remains at 31 degrees C, LCW glove inlet water temperature warmed to 45 degrees C; Condition 3: Stage 1--LCWG and LCW gloves 33 degrees C; Stage 2--LCWG inlet water temperature cooled to 28 degrees C, LCW gloves, 8 degrees C; Stage 3--LCWG remains at 28 degrees C, LCW glove water temperature warmed to 45 degrees C. RESULTS: Wrist/palm area warming showed a statistically significant increase in finger temperature (Tfing) in Stage 3 compared with Stage 2. Blood perfusion showed a trend toward a significantly greater value in Stage 3 compared with Stage 2. The LCW gloves were significantly more effective in increasing Stage 3 Tfing in Condition 1 (33 degrees C) compared with Condition 3 (28 degrees C). Across conditions, subjective perception of heat in the hands was significantly greater at Stage 3 than Stage 2; perception of overall body heat showed a trend for higher heat ratings in Stage 3 than Stage 2. CONCLUSIONS: Local wrist/palm warming was effective in increasing blood circulation to the distal upper extremities, suggesting the potential usefulness of this technique for enhancing astronaut comfort during EVA while decreasing power requirements.     

Thermoregulation and heat exchange in a nonuniform thermal environment during simulated extended EVA. Extravehicular activities

BACKGROUND: Nonuniform heating and cooling of the body, a possibility during extended duration extravehicular activities (EVA), was studied by means of a specially designed water circulating garment that independently heated or cooled the right and left sides of the body. The purpose was to assess whether there was a generalized reaction on the finger in extreme contradictory temperatures on the body surface, as a potential heat status controller. METHOD: Eight subjects, six men and two women, were studied while wearing a sagittally divided experimental garment with hands exposed in the following conditions: Stage 1 baseline--total body garment inlet water temperature at 33 degrees C; Stage 2--left side inlet water temperature heated to 45 degrees C; right side cooled to 8 degrees C; Stage 3--left side inlet water temperature cooled to 8 degrees C, right side heated to 45 degrees C. RESULTS: Temperatures on each side of the body surface as well as ear canal temperature (Tec) showed statistically significant Stage x Side interactions, demonstrating responsiveness to the thermal manipulations. Right and left finger temperatures (Tfing) were not significantly different across stages; their dynamic across time was similar. Rectal temperature (Tre) was not reactive to prevailing cold on the body surface, and therefore not informative. Subjective perception of heat and cold on the left and right sides of the body was consistent with actual temperature manipulations. CONCLUSIONS: Tec and Tre estimates of internal temperature do not provide accurate data for evaluating overall thermal status in nonuniform thermal conditions on the body surface. The use of Tfing has significant potential in providing more accurate information on thermal status and as a feedback method for more precise thermal regulation of the astronaut within the EVA space suit.     

Enhancing circulation to lower limbs during head-down tilt by warming upper body and thighs

BACKGROUND: Long-duration spaceflight results in deconditioning of the cardiovascular system, loss of fluid volume, bone demineralization, and atrophy of skeletal muscles, particularly affecting the lower limbs. We hypothesized that it is possible to improve blood circulation to the lower extremities in simulated microgravity by forcing the blood to deliver heat to the feet through heating parts of the upper body and thighs. METHODS: In Study 1, seven men and four women were assessed in an environmental chamber with head-down tilt (HDT) at 14 degrees, wearing a newly developed shortened multi-compartment liquid cooling/warming garment (SLCWG) with local tubing networks covering parts of the head, torso, thigh, arms, and hands, with fingers, lower leg, and feet exposed. Study 2 was the same as Study 1 with a new cohort of four men and two women, and the assessment of toe blood perfusion on all subjects. Heat was applied as follows: Stage 1--SLCWG inlet water temperature 33 degrees C to stabilize comfort; Stage 2--inlet water temperature 8-10 degrees C (in combination with HDT) to reach a criterion of 25 degrees C finger temperature (Tfing); and Stage 3--inlet water temperature 45 degrees C to restore Tfing to 33 degrees C. RESULTS: Improvement of foot circulation by delivering more heat to the upper body and thighs was noted; increases in toe temperature (Ttoe) suggest enhanced perfusion. From Stage 2 to 3, there were significant increases in Ttoe (p < 0.05), a significant decrease in diastolic BP (DBP) (p < 0.05), and a significant change across stages in subjective perception of foot comfort (p < 0.001) and foot heat (p < 0.06). Further, toe blood perfusion increased significantly from Stage 2 to 3 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate partial heating of the upper body/thighs improved blood circulation in the feet in simulated microgravity by delivering heat to the lower extremities through restriction of heat exchange with the environment in the heated body parts. This technique could serve as a supplemental countermeasure for increasing blood circulation to the lower extremities.     

Individual thermal profiles as a basis for comfort improvement in space and other environments

BACKGROUND: The development of individualized countermeasures to address problems in thermoregulation is of considerable importance for humans in space and other extreme environments. A methodology is presented for evaluating minimal/maximal heat flux from the total human body and specific body zones, and for assessing individual differences in the efficiency of heat exchange from these body areas. The goal is to apply this information to the design of individualized protective equipment. METHODS: A multi-compartment conductive plastic tubing liquid cooling/warming garment (LCWG) was developed. Inlet water temperatures of 8-45 degrees C were imposed sequentially to specific body areas while the remainder of the garment was maintained at 33 degrees C. RESULTS: There were significant differences in heat exchange level among body zones in both the 8 degrees and 45 degrees C temperature conditions (p < 0.001). The greatest amount of heat was absorbed/released by the following areas: thighs (8 degrees C: -2.12 +/- 0.14 kcal min(-1); 45 degrees C: +1.58 +/- 0.23); torso (8 degrees C: -2.12 +/- 0.13 kcal min(-1); 45 degrees C: +1.31 +/- 0.27); calves (8 degrees C: -1.59 +/- 0.26 kcal min(-1); 45 degrees C: +1.53 +/- 0.24); and forearms (8 degrees C: -1.67 +/- 0.29 kcal x min(-1); 45 degrees C: +1.45 +/- 0.20). These are primarily zones with relatively large muscle mass and adipose tissue. Calculation of absorption/release heat rates standardized per unit tube length and flow rate instead of zonal surface area covered showed that there was significantly greater heat transfer in the head, hands, and feet (p < 0.001). The areas in which there was considerable between-subject variability in rates of heat transfer and thus most informative for individual profile design were the torso, thighs, shoulders, and calves or forearms. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology developed is sensitive to individual differences in the process of heat exchange and variations in different body areas, depending on their size and tissue mass content. The design of individual thermal profiles is feasible for better comfort of astronauts on long-duration missions and personnel in other extreme environments.     

Human conscious response to thermal input is adjusted to changes in mean body temperature

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: To detect the dependable criteria of behavioural thermoregulation through modelling temperature fluctuations of individuals allowed to freely manipulate inlet water temperature of a liquid conditioning garment (LCG) during 130 min of passive exposure to -20 degrees C interspersed with a 10 min period of moderate exercise at the 65th minute using a double-blind experiment. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven volunteers (5 women; 23.40 (SD 2.09) years; BMI: 23.24 (SD 2.19)) who lacked previous experience with LCG and cold exposure experiments. RESULTS: Despite variations in core and skin temperatures, thermal comfort, thermal sensation, and mean body temperature did not fluctuate significantly over time. Participants were able to find a desired level of LCG inlet temperature within 25 minutes which was maintained at similar levels until the 65th minute of the cold exposure. During exercise, LCG inlet water temperature decreased significantly. Regression models demonstrated that mean skin temperature and change in mean body temperature were significantly associated with thermal comfort and thermal sensation. Subsequent models revealed that, although all temperature variables were associated with LCG inlet water temperature, the coefficient of determination mainly depended on mean skin temperature and change in mean body temperature. The involvement of skin temperature was anticipated as the liquid conditioning garment was in contact with the skin. CONCLUSIONS: Humans generate conscious thermoregulatory responses in resting and exercise conditions during exposures to cold environments that are aimed towards maintaining a threshold mean body temperature, rather than temperature changes in individual body regions.     

Shivering heat production and core cooling during head-in and head-out immersion in 17 degrees C water

INTRODUCTION: Many cold-water scenarios cause the head to be partially or fully immersed (e.g., ship wreck survival, scuba diving, cold-water adventure swim racing, cold-water drowning, etc.). However, the specific effects of head cold exposure are minimally understood. This study isolated the effect of whole-head submersion in cold water on surface heat loss and body core cooling when the protective shivering mechanism was intact. METHODS: Eight healthy men were studied in 17 degrees C water under four conditions: the body was either insulated or exposed, with the head either out of the water or completely submersed under the water within each insulated/exposed subcondition. RESULTS: Submersion of the head (7% of the body surface area) in the body-exposed condition increased total heat loss by 11% (P < 0.05). After 45 min, head-submersion increased core cooling by 343% in the body-insulated subcondition (head-out: 0.13 +/- 0.2 degree C, head-in: 0.47 +/- 0.3 degree C; P < 0.05) and by 56% in the body-exposed subcondition (head-out: 0.40 +/- 0.3 degree C and head-in: 0.73 +/- 0.6 degree C; P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: In both body-exposed and body-insulated subconditions, head submersion increased the rate of core cooling disproportionally more than the relative increase in total heat loss. This exaggerated core-cooling effect is consistent with a head cooling induced reduction of the thermal core, which could be stimulated by cooling of thermosensitive and/or trigeminal receptors in the scalp, neck, and face. These cooling effects of head submersion are not prevented by shivering heat production.     

Heat loss caused by immersing the hands in water

The effect of immersing the hands up to the wrist in cold water to alleviate heat strain was examined in volunteers wearing chemical protective clothing and gloves. Each subject, who was monitored with skin and rectal thermistors, was observed while walking on a treadmill at two different work rates (283 +/- 47 and 455 +/- 58 watts) at 23 degrees C and at a resting state at 35 degrees C. After 20 min of work at 23 degrees C or after 120 min in the hot room, the hands were immersed in water at temperatures of 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 degrees C. The amount of heat lost via the hands ranged between 124 +/- 14 and 31 +/- 4 watts (W) and was greater, the colder the water and harder the work. In most cases, this amount of cooling was sufficient to decrease skin temperature and lower the rate of increase of core temperature. We concluded that this method may be used to decrease resting time when working in the heat.     

Head cooling is desirable but not essential for preventing heat strain in pilots

Liquid-cooled garments (LCGs) are being considered for reducing heat strain in pilots. While head cooling has been shown to be thermally efficient and subjectively desirable, it is technically difficult to achieve. This laboratory study was carried out to see if head cooling in addition to torso cooling is a necessity. Six male subjects wore a cooling vest and cap under summer flight clothing on three occasions in a climatic chamber set at Tdb = 42 degrees C, Twb = 32 degrees C (RH = 50%), Tg = 52 degrees C at head position, WBGT = 35 degrees C. Cooling conditions were: control (CTRL), no fluid circulation; condition VEST, only torso cooling; condition HEAD, both torso and head cooling. Cooling fluid was circulated from a reservoir maintained at 10 degrees C. Subjective thermal comfort assessments confirmed the desirability of head cooling, but performance measurements and physiological measurements of thermal strain showed no statistically significant differences between conditions VEST and HEAD. It was concluded that head cooling is desirable but not essential.     

Thermal balance effects on vigilance during 2-hour exposures to -20 degrees C

INTRODUCTION: Human mental performance is markedly affected by environmental temperature, body temperature, body heat content, and comfort, but the effects of these different factors are not entirely clear. A liquid conditioning garment (LCG) can be used to manipulate these factors independently. We hypothesized that cold exposure (coldEX) has negative effects on vigilance which can be alleviated by increasing body heat content throughout or prior to coldEX. METHODS: Subjects (n = 10) were tested for vigilance during a 130-min coldEX to -20 degrees C while warmly clothed; a period of moderate exercise occurred at minutes 64-74. An LCG was used to provide heating either before coldEX (prior heating, PH) or throughout coldEX (heating, H); the control condition involved no heating (NH). RESULTS: There were significant differences among conditions for rectal temperature (PH: 37.3 +/- 0.26 degrees C, H: 37.0 +/- 0.24 degrees C, NH: 37.05 +/- 0.26 degrees C) and mean skin temperature (PH: 33.85 +/- 1.21 degrees C, H: 35.11 +/- 1.35 degrees C, NH: 32.84 +/- 0.65 degrees C). Reaction time decreased significantly after the 45th minute of coldEX in H and NH. At the same time, signal detection criteria in all conditions demonstrated considerable alterations, indicating bias in favor of 'target-present' responses, which were associated with lower mean skin temperature and thermal comfort vote. PH was more effective than H and NH in preserving reaction time and response consistency. Relative to men, women demonstrated increased heat loss and more deteriorated vigilance and signal detection. CONCLUSION: Vigilance deteriorates in cold conditions within 45 min of exposure. Increasing body heat content prior to coldEX is efficacious in preserving vigilance performance during exposures lasting up to 2 h.     

Cooling hyperthermic firefighters by immersing forearms and hands in 10 degrees C and 20 degrees C water

INTRODUCTION: Firefighters experience significant heat stress while working with heavy gear in a hot, humid environment. This study compared the cooling effectiveness of immersing the forearms and hands in 10 and 20 degrees C water. METHODS: Six men (33 +/- 10 yr; 180 +/- 4 cm; 78 +/- 9 kg; 19 +/- 5% body fat) wore firefighter 'turn-out gear' (heavy clothing and breathing apparatus weighing 27 kg) in a protocol including three 20-min exercise bouts (step test, 78 W, 40 degrees C air, 40% RH) each followed by a 20-min rest/cooling (21 degrees C air); i.e., 60 min of exercise, 60 min of cooling. Turn-out gear was removed during rest/cooling periods and subjects either rested (Control), immersed their hands in 10 or 20 degrees C water (H-10, H-20), or immersed their hands and forearms in 10 or 20 degrees C water (HF-10, HF-20). RESULTS: In 20 degrees C water, hand immersion did not reduce core temperature compared with Control; however, including forearm immersion decreased core temperature below Control values after both the second and final exercise periods (p < 0.001). In 10 degrees C water, adding forearm with hand immersion produced a lower core temperature (0.8 degrees C above baseline) than all other conditions (1.1 to 1.4 degrees C above baseline) after the final exercise period (p < 0.001). Sweat loss during Control (1458 g) was greater than all active cooling protocols (1146 g) (p < 0.001), which were not different from each other. DISCUSSION: Hand and forearm immersion in cool water is simple, reduces heat strain, and may increase work performance in a hot, humid environment. With 20 degrees C water, forearms should be immersed with the hands to be effective. At lower water temperatures, forearm and/or hand immersion will be effective, although forearm immersion will decrease core temperature further.     

Life jacket design affects dorsal head and chest exposure, core cooling, and cognition in 10 degrees C water

PURPOSE: Personal floatation devices (PFDs) differ in whether they maintain the head out of the water or allow the dorsum of the head to be immersed. Partial head submersion may hasten systemic cooling, incapacitation, and death in cold water. METHODS: Six healthy male volunteers (mean age = 26.8 yr; height = 184 cm; weight = 81 kg; body fat = 20%) were immersed in 10 degrees C water for 65 min, or until core temperature = 34 degrees C, under three conditions: PFD#1 maintained the head and upper chest out of the water; PFD#2 allowed the dorsal head and whole body to be immersed; and an insulated drysuit (control) allowed the dorsal head to be immersed. Mental performance tests included: logic reasoning test; Stroop word-color test; digit symbol coding; backward digit span; and paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT). RESULTS: Core cooling was significantly faster for PFD#2 (2.8 +/- 1.6 degrees C x h(-1)) than for PFD#1 (1.5 +/- 0.7 degrees C x h(-1)) or for the drysuit (0.4 +/- 0.2 degrees C x h(-1)). Although no statistically significant effects on cognitive performance were noted for the individual PFDs and drysuit, when analyzed as a group, four of the tests of cognitive performance (Stroop word-color, digit symbol coding, backward digit span, and PASAT) showed significant correlations between decreasing core temperature to 34 degrees C and diminished cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: Performance in more complicated mental tasks was adversely affected as core temperature decreased to 34 degrees C. The PFD that kept the head and upper chest out of the water preserved body heat and mental performance better than the PFD that produced horizontal flotation.     

Responsiveness of thermal sensors to nonuniform thermal environments and exercise

BACKGROUND: We investigated the utility of finger temperature, hand heat flux, and mean skin temperature as indices of overall thermal balance during nonuniform thermal manipulations combined with exercise, with a view to identifying useful feedback sites for input into personal thermal control systems. METHODS: There were 16 subjects who performed 4 x 30 s of 120% VO2peak cycling with a 4-min recovery. During recovery, subjects either received no cooling (CON), upper-body cooling (UC), or upper-body cooling combined with leg heating (UCLH) using a multi-zone liquid conditioning garment. Heat loss during recovery was approximately equal to heat production during exercise. Skin temperature was measured on the mid-medial phalanx of the fourth finger. Heat flux was measured on the dorsum of the hand. RESULTS: Neither hand heat flux or finger temperature distinguished between the two cooling conditions during any of the recovery periods, though hand heat flux was very sensitive to the onset and cessation of exercise. Mean skin temperature was significantly different (p < 0.05) during CON (34.0 +/- 0.1 degrees C), UC (32.5 +/- 0.2 degrees C), and UCLH (33.0 +/- 0.2 degrees C). CONCLUSION: Mean skin temperature may serve as a good indicator of overall heat exchange in the body, even when exposed to nonuniform thermal environments. As hand heat flux was very sensitive to the onset and cessation of exercise, it may be useful as a supplemental thermal feedback to modulate heat exchange in microclimate thermal control systems.     

Warming by immersion or exercise affects initial cooling rate during subsequent cold water immersion

INTRODUCTION: We examined the effect of prior heating, by exercise and warm-water immersion, on core cooling rates in individuals rendered mildly hypothermic by immersion in cold water. METHODS: There were seven male subjects who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) seated rest for 15 min (control); 2) cycling ergometry for 15 min at 70% Vo2 peak (active warming); or 3) immersion in a circulated bath at 40 degrees C to an esophageal temperature (Tes) similar to that at the end of exercise (passive warming). Subjects were then immersed in 7 degrees C water to a Tes of 34.5 degrees C. RESULTS: Initial Tes cooling rates (initial approximately 6 min cooling) differed significantly among the treatment conditions (0.074 +/- 0.045, 0.129 +/- 0.076, and 0.348 +/- 0.117 degrees C x min(-1) for control, active, and passive warming conditions, respectively); however, secondary cooling rates (rates following initial approximately 6 min cooling to the end of immersion) were not different between treatments (average of 0.102 +/- 0.085 degrees C x min(-1)). Overall Tes cooling rates during the full immersion period differed significantly and were 0.067 +/- 0.047, 0.085 +/- 0.045, and 0.209 +/- 0.131 degrees C x min(-1) for control, active, and passive warming, respectively. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that prior warming by both active and, to a greater extent, passive warming, may predispose a person to greater heat loss and to experience a larger decline in core temperature when subsequently exposed to cold water. Thus, functional time and possibly survival time could be reduced when cold water immersion is preceded by whole-body passive warming, and to a lesser degree by active warming.     

The effect of hand immersion on body temperature when wearing impermeable clothing

The effects of hand immersion on body temperature have been investigated in men wearing impermeable NBC clothing. Six men worked continuously at a rate of approximately 490 J. sec-1 in an environmental temperature of 30 degrees C. Each subject was permitted to rest for a period of 20 minutes when their aural temperature reached 37.5 degrees C, and again on reaching 38 degrees C, and for a third time on reaching 38.5 degrees C (three rest periods in total). Each subject completed three experimental conditions whereby, during the rest periods they either: a. Did not immerse their hands (control). b. Immersed both hands in a water bath set at 25 degrees C. c. Immersed both hands in water at 10 degrees C. Physiological measures of core temperature, skin temperature and heart rate were recorded at intervals throughout the experiment. Measures of mean aural temperature and mean skin temperature were significantly (P less than 0.05) reduced if hands were immersed during these rest periods, compared to non immersion. As a result, the total work time of subjects was extended when in the immersed conditions by some 10-20 minutes within the confines of the protocol. It is concluded that this technique of simple hand immersion may be effective in reducing heat stress where normal routes to heat loss are compromised.     

Finger and toe temperatures on exposure to cold water and cold air

INTRODUCTION: Subjects with a weak cold-induced vasodilatation response (CIVD) to experimental cold-water immersion of the fingers in a laboratory setting have been shown to have a higher risk for local cold injuries when exposed to cold in real life. Most of the cold injuries in real life, however, occur in the foot in cold air rather than in the hand in cold water. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to investigate the within-subject relation between CIVD in the fingers and toes exposed to cold water and cold air. METHODS: In 4 experimental sessions, 11 healthy male subjects immersed their toes and fingers in 5 degrees C water and exposed the fingers and toes to -18 degrees C cold air for 30 min. The pad temperature of the middle three digits was measured. RESULTS: CIVD in water was more pronounced in the fingers (onset time 5.1 +/- 1.8 min; amplitude 5.0 +/- 2.1 degrees C) than in the toes (onset time 10.6 +/- 6.0 min; amplitude 3.0 +/- 1.0 degrees C). Out of 22 skin temperature responses to cold air, 13 were not identifiable as CIVD. The mean skin temperatures for fingers and toes during the last 20 min of cold exposure were 25.6 +/- 7.1 degrees C and 20.9 +/- 6.8 degrees C, respectively, for air and 9.3 +/- 1.9 degrees C and 7.1 +/- 1.3 degrees C for water immersion. There was a strong relation between the mean temperature of the fingers during cold-water immersion and toes during cold air exposure (r = 0.83, P < 0.01), showing that a weak CIVD response in the hand is related to a weak response in the foot. DISCUSSION: We conclude that the cold-water finger immersion test is related to the temperature response in the toes and may thus continue to serve as a valid indicator for the risk of local cold injuries.     

Heat strain attenuation while wearing NBC clothing: dry-ice vest compared to water spray

BACKGROUND: While wearing impermeable nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) clothing, reduction of thermal stress is of primary importance. We compared the effect between two cooling methods on the attenuation of heat strain. METHODS: There were six male subjects who were divided into two groups of three and exposed on two consecutive days to 125 min of exercise in a high heat load (40 degrees C, 40% RH) wearing NBC clothing. They were cooled by one of two different cooling methods: an active cooling vest (CV) based on the sublimation of dry ice, or tap water spraying (TP). RESULTS: After 2 h, rectal temperature (Tre) was significantly higher for the CV compared with the TP (38.1 +/- 0.04 degrees C vs. 37.7 +/- 0.10 degrees C, respectively). Skin temperature (Tsk) was significantly higher for the CV compared with the TP (36.60 +/- 0.54 degrees C vs. 34.90 +/- 0.35 degrees C, respectively). In the second hour, heart rate (HR) was significantly higher for CV compared with TP (118 +/- 13 bpm vs. 104 +/- 64 bpm, respectively). Heat storage was significantly higher after the first and second hours for the CV compared with the TP. The physiological strain index (PSI) was higher for CV compared with TP in the second hour. Sweat rate (msw) was significantly higher for CV compared with TP (560 +/- 45 g x h(-1) vs. 409 +/- 84 g x h(-1), respectively). Subjective thermal comfort was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: TP was more effective than the CV in reducing heat strain under the conditions used in the study. Until a significant breakthrough in reducing heat strain while wearing NBC clothing in field conditions can be found, TP appears to be an effective and recommended cooling method.     

Evaluation of three commercial microclimate cooling systems

Three commercially available microclimate cooling systems were evaluated for their ability to reduce heat stress in men exercising in a hot environment while wearing high insulative, low permeability clothing. Five male volunteers performed three 180-min experiments (three repeats of 10 min rest, 50 min walking at 440 watts) in an environment of 38 degrees C dry bulb (Tdb), 12 degrees C dew point (Tdp). The cooling systems were: 1) ILC Dover Model 19 Coolvest (ILC), mean inlet temperature 5.0 degrees C; 2) LSSI Coolhead (LSSI), mean inlet temperature 14.5 degrees C; and 3) Thermacor Cooling Vest (THERM), mean inlet temperature 28.3 degrees C. Endurance time (ET), heart rate (HR), rectal temperature (Tre), mean skin temperature (Tsk), sweating rate (SR), rated perceived exertion (RPE), and thermal sensation (TS) were measured. A computer model prediction of ET with no cooling was 101 min. ET was greater (p less than 0.01) with ILC (178 min) than THERM (131 min) which was greater (p less than 0.01) than LSSI (83 min). The subjects self terminated on all LSSI tests because of headaches. Statistical analyses were performed on data collected at 60 min to have values on all subjects. There were no differences in HR, Tre, SR, or TS values among the cooling vests. The subjects' Tsk was lower (p less than 0.05) for the LSSI than THERM; and RPE values were higher (p less than 0.05) for LSSI than the other two vests. These data suggest an improved physiological response to exercise heat stress with all three commercial systems with the greatest benefit in performance time provided by the ILC cooling system.     

Immersion of distal arms and legs in warm water (AVA rewarming) effectively rewarms mildly hypothermic humans

INTRODUCTION: Active rewarming of hypothermic victims for field use, and where transport to medical facilities is impossible, might be the only way to restore deep body temperature. In active rewarming in warm water, there has been a controversy concerning whether arms and legs should be immersed in the water or left out. Further, it has been suggested in the Royal Danish Navy treatment regime, that immersion of hands, forearms, feet, and lower legs alone might accomplish rapid rates of rewarming (AVA rewarming). METHODS: On three occasions, six subjects (one female) were cooled in 8 degrees C water, to an esophageal temperature of 34.3+/-0.8 (+/-SD) degrees C. After cooling the subjects were warmed by shivering heat production alone, or by immersing the distal extremities (hands, forearms, feet and lower legs) in either 42 degrees C or 45 degrees C water. RESULTS: The post cooling afterdrop in esophageal temperature was decreased by both 42 degrees C and 45 degrees C water immersion (0.4+/-0.2 degrees C) compared with the shivering alone procedure (0.6+/-0.4 degrees C; p < 0.05). The subsequent rate of rewarming was significantly greater with 45 degrees C water immersion (9.9+/-3.2 degrees C x h(-1)) than both 42 degrees C water immersion (6.1+/-1.2 degrees C x h(-1)) and shivering alone (3.4+/-1.5 degrees C x h(-1); p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The extremity rewarming procedure was experienced by the subjects as the most comfortable as the rapid rise in deep body temperature shortened the period of shivering. During the extremity rewarming procedures the rectal temperature lagged considerably behind the esophageal and aural canal (via indwelling thermocouple) temperatures. Thus large gradients may still exist between body compartments even though the heart is warmed.     

Rapid cooling techniques in joggers experiencing heat strain

This study examined subjects that exercised on three occasions in a heated environment (WBGT = 39 degrees C] until they experienced heat strain. Since morbidity and mortality due to heat injury increase with the duration of elevated core temperature, it is important that techniques to lower core temperature be evaluated. Following three exercise sessions, subjects underwent each of three core cooling treatments in random order: 1) Torso immersion in cool water, 2) Hands and feet immersion in cool water, and 3) Sit-in-shade with a 1.5mph breeze provided. Subjects (n=5) consistently reached peak rectal temperatures of 38.8 (+/-0.1) degrees C following each exercise bout in the heated environment. Torso immersion produced a significantly (p<0.05) greater rate of decline in rectal temperature (0.25+/-0.10 degrees C/min) than the hands and feet immersion technique (0.16+/-0.05 degrees C/min) and the sit in the shade technique (0.11+/-0.04 degrees C/min). After only 10 minutes of cooling, the differences among cooling techniques were evident. Similar trends were observed for mean heart rate readings, albeit not significant (p>0.05). It was concluded that rectal temperatures can be reduced rapidly through the use of a cool water torso-immersion technique.     

Isolated core vs. superficial cooling effects on virtual maze navigation

INTRODUCTION: Cold impairs cognitive performance and is a common occurrence in many survival situations. Altered behavior patterns due to impaired navigation abilities in cold environments are potential problems in lost-person situations. We investigated the separate effects of low core temperature and superficial cooling on a spatially demanding virtual navigation task. METHODS: There were 12 healthy men who were passively cooled via 15 degrees C water immersion to a core temperature of 36.0 degrees C, then transferred to a warm (40 degrees C) water bath to eliminate superficial shivering while completing a series of 20 virtual computer mazes. In a control condition, subjects rested in a thermoneutral (approximately 35 degrees C) bath for a time-matched period before being transferred to a warm bath for testing. Superficial cooling and distraction were achieved by whole-body immersion in 35 degree water for a time-matched period, followed by lower leg immersion in 10 degree C water for the duration of the navigational tests. RESULTS: Mean completion time and mean error scores for the mazes were not significantly different (p > 0.05) across the core cooling (16.59 +/- 11.54 s, 0.91 +/- 1.86 errors), control (15.40 +/- 8.85 s, 0.82 +/- 1.76 errors), and superficial cooling (15.19 +/- 7.80 s, 0.77 +/- 1.40 errors) conditions. DISCUSSION: Separately reducing core temperature or increasing cold sensation in the lower extremities did not influence performance on virtual computer mazes, suggesting that navigation is more resistive to cooling than other, simpler cognitive tasks. Further research is warranted to explore navigational ability at progressively lower core and skin temperatures, and in different populations.