Incidence and Characteristics of Osteolysis in HXLPE THA at 16-Year Follow up in Patients 50 Years and Less

IntroductionYoung patients present a challenge for total hip arthroplasty (THA) survivorship. Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners have decreased the prevalence of osteolysis; however, concerns exist regarding the biologic activity of wear particles. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and characteristics of osteolytic lesions in young HXLPE THA patients at an average 16-year follow up and determine the ability to detect osteolysis.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study involving 22 patients (26 THA) under age 50 at primary THA receiving HXLPE liners coupled with cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral heads. Computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed for osteolysis. Chi-squared analysis was used for categorical variables and unpaired Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test for continuous variables. Logistic regression was used to compare wear rates between those patients with and without osteolysis.ResultsThe mean age at surgery was 38.5 years. The mean time from surgery to CT scan was sixteen years (range 14.25–19.5 years). Nine of the 26 THA showed osteolysis. The mean volume of the lesions was 2.8 cm3. Linear (mean 0.008 mm/y) and volumetric (mean 4.5 mm3/year) wear rates were negligible. One-third of osteolytic lesions were visible on radiographs. Logistic regression failed to demonstrate a correlation between wear rates or UCLA activity score and osteolysis.ConclusionWe observed osteolysis in 35% of HXLPE THA in young patients at mean 16-year follow up despite zero revisions for wear-related problems and clinically insignificant wear rates.Level of EvidenceIV.     

Ten- to Sixteen-Year Follow-Up of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Factors Affect Wear?

BackgroundIncrease in acetabular cup abduction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) using conventional polyethylene is associated with greater linear wear. Whether this relationship holds true for highly crosslinked liners, particularly with long-term follow-up, is still controversial. The effect of liner thickness on wear of highly cross-linked liners also remains to be clarified.This study sought to determine (1) the long-term clinical and radiological performance of highly cross-linked polyethylene in THA and (2) the effect of acetabular component positioning, polyethylene thickness, and patient demographics on wear.MethodsNinety-three THAs using a 28-mm hip ball, single brand of highly cross-linked polyethylene liner, and cementless cup were performed in 87 patients. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score and need for revision surgery. Linear and volumetric wear, presence of osteolysis, and cup abduction angle were assessed.ResultsThe mean age at operation was 51.4 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.7 years (10-16 years). Patients aged >50 years had higher rates of linear wear than those aged <50 years (P = .015). Positive correlation was found between cup abduction angle (P = .014) and cup version (P = .035) with a linear wear rate. Thinner liners (≤7 mm) had similar rates of linear and volumetric wear as thicker liners (≥8 mm) (P = .447).ConclusionThis is the only study to demonstrate a positive significant relationship between cup abduction angle and version with linear wear rate in THA with at least 10 years of follow-up. Liner thickness was not found to affect wear rates.     

Unexpected Wear of a Uniquely Designed Moderately Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundA uniquely designed, non–heat-treated moderately cross-linked acetabular polyethylene liner used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) demonstrated excessive wear during routine follow-up, prompting an evaluation of the linear wear rate.MethodsAll THAs were performed by the senior author. The study group included 38 THAs using the uniquely designed polyethylene in question, compared to a control group of 21 THAs using another moderately cross-linked polyethylene with good 10-year outcomes. Two-dimensional linear head penetration wear measurements were obtained using the Martell Hip Analysis Suite, and retrieval analysis was performed on two liners.ResultsThe study group had a significantly higher average penetration rate of 0.089 mm/y than the control group average rate of 0.047 mm/y (P = .04). Forty-five percent of the study group had a wear rate above the osteolysis threshold (0.1 mm/y), compared to 24% in the control group. Macroscopic analysis of two retrieved liners validated the radiographic findings.ConclusionThe data suggest unexpectedly higher wear rates for a moderately cross-linked polyethylene design, with nearly half of the study group at risk for osteolysis. Further registry or database analyses of this particular moderately cross-linked polyethylene are warranted.     

Differences in Femoral Head Penetration Between Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Cemented Sockets and Uncemented Liners

BackgroundThis study aimed at investigating differences in femoral head penetration between highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) cemented sockets and uncemented liners during 5 years postoperatively.MethodsNinety-six patients (106 hips) with a mean age of 64.4 (range, 35-83) years underwent total hip arthroplasty using a HXLPE cemented socket or liner and were respectively divided into cemented (35 patients [37 hips]) and uncemented (61 patients [69 hips]) groups. Femoral head penetrations were evaluated on both anteroposterior (AP)-view and Lauenstein-view radiographs, and mean polyethylene (PE) wear rates were calculated based on femoral head penetration from 2 to 5 years. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess risk factors for PE wear.ResultsAt 5 years postoperatively, the cemented and uncemented groups exhibited proximal direction femoral head penetrations of 0.103 mm and 0.124 mm (P = .226) and anterior direction penetrations of 0.090 mm and 0.151 mm (P = .002), respectively. The corresponding mean PE wear rates were 0.004 mm/y and 0.009 mm/y in the AP-view (P = .286) and 0.005 mm/y and 0.012 mm/y in the Lauenstein-view (P = .168), respectively. Left-side operation and high activity were independent risk factors for PE wear on AP-view.ConclusionWhen HXLPE was used, all mean PE wear rates were very low and those of cemented sockets and uncemented liners were very similar. PE particle theory suggests that the occurrence of osteolysis and related aseptic loosening might consequently decrease.     

The Relationship Between Polyethylene Wear and Periprosthetic Osteolysis in Total Hip Arthroplasty at 12 Years in a Randomized Controlled Trial Cohort

Background

Polyethylene acetabular components are common in hip arthroplasty. Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has lower wear than ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Evidence suggests that wear particles induce inflammation causing periprosthetic osteolysis contributing to implant loosening with wear rates of 0.05 mm/y were considered safe. We aimed to compare incidence and volume of periacetabular osteolysis between HXLPE and UHMWPE using computed tomography.

Fifteen-Year Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty With Cobalt-Chromium Femoral Heads on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years and Less

BackgroundHighly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) is the most commonly used bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of its superior wear properties, but long-term results in young patients are limited. Mid-term survivorship has been promising; however, polyethylene wear rates and need for revision surgeries remain a concern in this population. The purpose of our study is to investigate polyethylene wear rates, implant survivorship, wear-related revisions, and patient-reported outcomes in a young patient cohort at 15-year follow-up.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of a prospective longitudinal cohort of 82 consecutive patients (89 hips) who underwent primary THA with an HXLPE acetabular liner and a cobalt-chromium femoral head. The mean age at the time of surgery for the cohort was 38.8 years (range 12-50). All patients received HXLPE liners with a cementless acetabular component coupled with a cobalt-chrome femoral head through a posterior approach with a cementless femoral component. All components were from a single manufacturer. We recorded University of California, Los Angeles Activity, and modified Harris Hip Scores. Wear calculations were made using the Martell Hip Analysis Suite (Version 8.0.4.3).ResultsAt average 15 years (range 13.1-18.5), there was a revision-free survivorship of 97.8% in our HXLPE group with no wear-related revisions. We observed a linear wear rate of 0.0185 mm/y (standard deviation 0.05) after accounting for a 1-year bedding-in period. The volumetric wear rate was found to be 12.80 mm³/y (standard deviation 22.69). These numbers are registered as clinically undetectable and are comparable to steady state wear rates in the same cohort of patients at earlier time points. We found no radiographic changes concerning osteolysis. We observed excellent patient-reported outcomes at this time point with improvements in modified Harris Hip Scores (35.3 [22.5], P < .0001) and University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scores (median 6.0, P < .0001).ConclusionAt 15-year follow-up, we demonstrated that HXLPE bearings in this young cohort had excellent wear properties, maintained superior clinical improvements, and underwent no wear-related revision operations. The HXLPE and cobalt-chrome bearing couple continues to be extremely effective 15 years after primary THA in patients less than 50 years.Level of EvidenceIV.     

Long-Term Wear-Related Complications of Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundHighly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners have been developed to address the wear-related problems associated with conventional polyethylene (CPE) such as osteolysis or aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this systematic meta-analysis, we compared the long-term efficacy in preventing radiological osteolysis and revision surgery between HXLPE and CPE.MethodsWe included 14 studies that compared HXLPE and CPE reporting the incidence of wear-related complications with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. We investigated 5 wear-related complications: osteolysis, excessive wear, linear wear rate, revision surgery due to wear, and progress of osteolysis/aseptic loosening. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis to estimate odds ratio (OR) and a proportional meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of each complication.ResultsAmong 1,175 THAs, 220 osteolysis and 78 wear-related revisions were detected. The use of HXLPE reduced the risk of overall osteolysis (OR 0.30; P = .001), excessive wear (OR 0.10; P < .001), linear wear rate (weighted mean difference 0.09; P < .001), the risk of overall wear-related revisions (OR 0.06; P < .001), and revisions due to aseptic loosening (OR 0.23; P = .015). As per the proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of osteolysis, excessive wear, and the overall wear-related revision rate were 14%, 8%, and 3% in HXLPE and 25%, 33%, and 20% in CPE, respectively.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that HXLPE dramatically reduced the rate of osteolysis and wear-related revision surgery. However, as polyethylene wear and osteolysis still lead to revision surgery, ongoing clinical and retrieval studies are required to analyze long-term outcomes.     

Eighteen-Year Follow-Up Study of 2 Alternative Bearing Surfaces Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Same Young Patients

BackgroundThis study compares the long-term functional, radiographic, and computed tomography scan outcomes and implant survivorship of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (C-O-C THA) and ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (C-O-HXLPE THA) in the same patients.MethodsIn this randomized, prospective trial conducted between January 1999 and April 2003, 133 patients (266 hips) younger than 55 years were enrolled. Each patient received C-O-C THA in 1 hip and a C-O-HXLPE THA in the other. The mean follow-up was 17.1 years (range, 15-18 years); there were 84 men and 49 women with a mean age of 53 ± 7 years (range, 25-55 years).ResultsAt the latest follow-up, mean Harris hip scores (94 vs 93 points; P = .861), pain scores (43 vs 42 points; P = .651), and patient satisfaction scores (7.8 vs 7.6 points; P = .379) were not different between the 2 groups. Eight hips (3%) in the C-O-C THA had an audible squeaking sound. The mean annual penetration rate of HXLPE was 0.0162 ± 0.032 mm per year. No osteolysis was recorded on radiographs or computed tomography scans in either group. At 17.1 years, the survival rate of the acetabular component was 97% in the C-O-C bearing group and 98% in the C-O-HXLPE bearing group (P = .923). The survival rate of the femoral component was 99% in both groups.ConclusionBoth C-O-C THA and C-O-HXLPE THA functioned well, with no osteolysis at mean of 17.1-year follow-up.     

Wear Comparison Between a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene and Conventional Polyethylene Against a Zirconia Femoral Head : Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) was developed to reduce wear of articular bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty patients. Several studies have shown reduced wear of HXLPE compared with conventional polyethylene; however, these studies had used HXLPE in combination with a Co-Cr metal head. The purpose of this study was to compare the 5-year in vivo wear of HXLPE with that of conventional PE using a zirconia femoral head. Forty-five hips with a Trilogy HXLPE (Zimmer, Warsaw, Ind) were matched and compared with a control group of 20 conventional Trilogy PE hips. The 2-dimensional linear wear rate was significantly less in the HXLPE group between 1 and 5 years postoperation (P < .001). The results show that HXLPE reduces short-term polyethylene wear against not only a Co-Cr head but also a zirconia head.     

In Vivo Performance of Vitamin E Stabilized Polyethylene Implants for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Review

BackgroundVitamin E stabilization was introduced to improve the oxidative stability, wear resistance, and mechanical properties of highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE). In this literature review, we asked: (1) How has vitamin E-stabilized HXLPE (VEPE) performed in vivo for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and how does it compare with conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and HXLPE without vitamin E; and (2) Is there an apparent difference in the clinical performance of VEPE created by blending versus diffusion?MethodsWe performed a systematic search of the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using PubMed and Embase. Included studies reported the in vivo behavior of VEPE in THA. We reviewed 41 studies.ResultsFor all studies that compared polyethylene with and without VE stabilization, outcomes for VEPE were either equivalent or superior to the control group (for HXLPE without VE and conventional UHMWPE controls, respectively). Hip insert wear rates were generally less than 0.1 mm/year and in most cases were less than 0.05 mm/year. No VEPE components were revised for osteolysis or adverse outcomes specific to VE incorporation.ConclusionAcross the literature, we found that VEPE was reported to be clinically effective for THA applications, with much of the research indicating positive clinical outcomes and lower or equivalent wear rates compared to conventional UHMWPE and HXLPE controls without VE. Instances of early component fracture were reported, but have multiple potential causes. There is a gap in the literature for comparison of blended and diffused components, so the in vivo impact of VE incorporation method remains to be seen. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive summary of VEPE clinical performance for THA and may serve as a resource for future investigations.     

Comparing In Vivo Performance of Two Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Thermal Treatments: Remelting vs Annealing in Acetabular Liners

BackgroundThe introduction of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) acetabular liners has greatly improved the wear performance of metal-on-PE bearing surfaces used in total hip arthroplasty. Changing the sterilization environment and adding thermal treatments, such as remelting or annealing, were introduced to limit on-shelf and in vivo oxidation of cross-linked liners. This study compares the wear properties of the remelted A-CLASS (MicroPort) HXLPE liner to a sequentially annealed HXLPE.MethodsThis retrospective study assessed linear and volumetric wear rates using Martell Hip Analysis Suite, and clinical performance through incidences of revision surgeries. A total of 80 remelted and 53 annealed liners were included in the wear analysis. All hips were reviewed for revisions.ResultsThere were no significant differences in steady-state linear or volumetric wear rates for remelted and annealed liners, 0.01 (?0.07 to 0.14) vs ?0.01 (?0.11 to 0.1) mm/y (P = .28) and ?1.03 (?30.99 to 45.43) vs ?1.31 (?32.23 to 23.70) mm³/y (P = .30), respectively. Both cohorts were below the 0.1 mm/y linear wear threshold. The wear rates for patients with femoral head sizes ≥36 mm were not significantly different than those with 32 and 28 mm femoral head sizes (P = .60). Similarly, wear rates for patients with an excessively vertical acetabular component (>50°) were not significantly different than those with standard acetabular component orientations (P = .97). No hips were revised due to liner-related complications.ConclusionThe wear rates of the A-CLASS remelted HXLPE acetabular liner wear rates were comparable to those of a sequentially annealed HXLPE. Further long-term studies are required to ensure acceptable resistance to fatigue and in vivo oxidation.     

Outcome and Risk Factors Associated with Failures of Isolated Bearing Exchange for Osteolysis in Well-Fixed Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundIt is often challenging to decide whether to revise only the bearing or femoral acetabular component in the setting of progressive osteolysis without component loosening in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we aimed to (1) compare the survivorship of isolated bearing exchange and single/both component revision for patients with periprosthetic osteolysis without component loosening, and (2) identify potential risk factors associated with failures of isolated bearing exchange.MethodsA total of 228 consecutive cases of revision THA for progressive osteolysis without component loosening was evaluated in 2 groups: (1) 124 component revision and (2) 104 isolated bearing exchange. The primary outcome was survival, with failure defined as repeat revision or reoperation for any reason. Patient risk factors, such as demographics and medical comorbidities, were also analyzed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in survivorship between the component revision group and the bearing exchange group at 10 years (85% vs 82%; P = .89). There was no progression of osteolysis on radiographs at last follow-up for patients with isolated bearing change. Univariate regression modeling demonstrated that renal disease was associated with failure of isolated bearing exchange after revision THA.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that isolated bearing exchange is associated with similar outcomes compared with component revision for aseptic osteolysis without loosening, demonstrating that isolated bearing exchange is a viable option for selected patients with osteolysis in the setting of well-fixed THA components. This provides clinically useful information for surgeons in the surgical treatment of THA patients with wear and osteolysis without component loosening.     

Causes of Revision in Young Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to identify reasons for revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients who underwent primary THA at or before the age of 35 years. We hypothesized that the reasons for revision in younger patients would be different from the general older population of patients undergoing THA because of the differences in diagnoses, complexity of deformities, and differences in activity level.MethodsData for 108 hips in 82 patients who underwent primary THA at our institution before the age of 35 years from 1982-2007 and subsequently underwent revision THA were reviewed. Operative reports and clinic notes were reviewed to determine baseline characteristics, reason for revision, timing of revision, and components revised.ResultsThe mean age at index surgery was 25.4 years, and mean time from index to revision surgery was 10.1 years. The most common preoperative diagnoses included avascular necrosis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, developmental dysplasia of the hip, and posttraumatic arthritis. The most common reasons for revision were acetabular loosening (30.1%), femoral loosening (23.7%), and polyethylene wear (24.7%). 8.3% of patients underwent primary THA with highly cross-linked polyethylene, while the remainder of the patients underwent THA when conventional polyethylene was used. There was no statistically significant association between which component(s) were revised and initial fixation (ie cemented or uncemented prosthesis) (P = .26).ConclusionCauses of revision in this population appear to differ from the general THA population. In young patients, acetabular loosening, femur loosening, and polyethylene wear were the most common causes of revision. Instability and infection were less common compared with literature reports of causes of revision in older patients. Findings in this study may be useful in counseling young patients undergoing THA, though results were likely influenced by the use of conventional rather than highly cross-linked polyethylene in this cohort.     

Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With a 32-mm Cobalt-Chromium Head on Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene and a Tapered,Fiber Metal Proximally Coated Femoral Stem

BackgroundThe clinical and radiographic results of cementless total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm cobalt-chromium head on remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) and a tapered, fiber metal proximally coated femoral stem were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 12 years.MethodsA total of 57 cementless total hip arthroplasties using remelted HXLPE combined with a 32-mm cobalt-chromium head, and a tapered, fiber metal proximally coated femoral stem were performed from October 2004 to December 2006. Clinical evaluation was performed using the Merle d’Aubigné and Postel scoring system. Standardized anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the pelvis and femur without weight-bearing were analyzed. Radiographic measurements of two-dimensional femoral head penetration into the polyethylene were performed with a computerized method. The steady-state wear rates were measured based on the radiographs from the first year after surgery to the final follow-up.ResultsThe mean Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score improved significantly from 10.7 points preoperatively to 15.6 postoperatively (P < .001). No osteolysis was found around the implant. Stem fixation in all cases showed stable bone ingrowth. Third-degree stress shielding was found in 46% of all stems. The total head penetration rate was 0.05 mm/y, and the steady-state wear rate was 0.01 mm/y. The Kaplan–Meier survivorship with the end point of revision was 95% (95% confidence interval, 85%-98%) at 12 years.ConclusionA 32-mm cobalt-chromium head on remelted HXLPE demonstrated low wear properties, and a tapered, fiber metal proximally coated femoral stem showed good results at long-term follow-up.     

全髋关节置换术治疗髋臼骨折内固定术后继发创伤性髋关节炎的疗效观察

目的:探讨人工全髋关节置换术治疗髋臼骨折术后创伤性关节炎的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2010年6月至2014年6月收治的33例(33髋)髋臼骨折术后创伤性关节炎患者资料,男21例,女12例;年龄22~65岁,平均44.6岁。均采用生物型假体行全髋关节置换术治疗。采用Harris评分对患者术前后的髋关节功能进行评分,拍X线片对假体状态进行影像学评估。结果:所有患者获得随访,随访时间7~38个月,平均21.6个月。末次随访时髋关节Harris评分从术前平均(53.6±2.4)分提高至(94.0±3.0)分,差异有统计学意义(t=55.37,P0.05),髋关节功能明显改善。影像学评估显示假体位置良好,无假体松动、关节脱位及明显假体周围骨溶解等并发症。结论:全髋关节置换术是治疗髋臼骨折内固定术后继发创伤性髋关节炎的有效治疗手段,髋臼骨折内固定材料显露困难但不影响假体安放,行全髋置换术可不取出。     

Computed Tomographic Osteolytic Analysis of a First-Generation Remelted Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Hip Arthroplasty—At a Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundLow polyethylene wear rate and low incidence of osteolysis have been reported after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using first-generation remelted highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE). However, osteolysis has not been evaluated in long-term studies of these patients (15 years or more). The present study assessed computed tomography (CT) images to determine the incidence of osteolysis associated with HXLPE in THA during at least 15 years of follow-up.MethodsWe evaluated 105 primary THAs in 84 patients (77 women and 7 men). Mean follow-up was 15.9 years (range, 15-18 years). All THAs used a Longevity HXLPE liner and a 26-mm zirconia femoral head. Areas of osteolysis were identified from CT images using 3D and multiplanar reconstruction views.ResultsCT 3D multiplanar reconstruction images at 15-year follow-up showed no obvious osteolysis in the acetabulum or femur of any patient. No patients developed cup loosening or liner breakage.ConclusionOur study indicates that first-generation remelted HXLPE liners do not increase the risk of osteolysis during 15-year follow-up and suggests that the wear particles from first-generation remelted HXLPE are less biologically active than those generated by conventional polyethylene devices.     

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Standard and Elevated-Rim Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Acetabular Liners in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up: Single-Center,Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundThe aims of the present study are to (1) conduct the longest-to-date follow-up wear analysis of the highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners, (2) assess the incidence of femoral and acetabular osteolysis, and (3) compare the surgical outcomes between standard and elevated-rim acetabular liners in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 112 primary THAs performed by a single experienced arthroplasty surgeon at our institution between March 2000 and December 2003. Patients were classified based on the type of acetabular liner used: standard or elevated-rim liner. For evaluation of surgical outcomes, the following data were collected: acetabular cup position (anteversion and inclination), wear rate (linear and volumetric), presence of osteolysis, history of reoperation (all-cause and wear-related), complications (deep joint infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture), and Harris hip score at last follow-up.ResultsLinear and volumetric wear rates were 0.028 mm/y (0.000-0.145 mm/y) and 11.641 mm³/y (0.000-70.000 mm³/y) in the standard group and 0.026 mm/y (0.000-0.094mm/y) and 9.706 mm³/y (0.000-33.000 mm³/y) in the elevated-rim group, respectively. These rates were not significantly different between groups. One case of osteolysis was confirmed in the standard group, whereas no osteolysis was observed in the elevated-rim group.ConclusionWe suggest that elevated-rim highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners might be a good implant option that can be used safely.     

Mid-term results of large diameter heads on cross-linked polyethylene liners in total hip replacement

BackgroundHighly cross-linked polyethylene liners in total hip replacement (THR) have allowed the use of larger diameter femoral heads. Larger heads allow for increased range of motion, decreased implant impingement, and protection against dislocation. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with large femoral heads THR at 4 years postop.Materials and methodsStudy includes 28 patients who had a primary THR with a 36 mm larger femoral head were retrospectively for minimum 4 years follow-up. All patients received a cementless acetabular shell and a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner with an inner diameter of 36 mm. The median radiographic follow-up was 4 years (range 2.0–6.0), and patients were assessed clinically by Harris hip score.ResultsThe mean follow-up is minimum 4 years (range 2–6 years) results in all operated patients showed marked improvement in Harris hip score from preoperative mean 49.1 to 89.9 at 4 years or more follow-up. The complications include superficial infection (n = 2). No dislocation, or no osteolysis was seen in the pelvis or proximal femur, and no components failed due to aseptic loosening. There was no evidence of cup migration, screw breakage, or eccentric wear on the liner.ConclusionThe mid-term results in this series of patients with LDH using 36 mm femoral head articulating with highly cross linked polyethylene showed excellent clinical, and radiological results, in terms of, joint restoration that replicates the natural anatomy, optimized range of motion without impingement & reduced opportunity for postoperative dislocation.     

Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Healed Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures. A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundMany studies have analyzed the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed intertrochanteric fracture fixation, but not after healed fracture. The objective is to investigate the influence of a prior healed intertrochanteric fracture fixation on the outcomes of a subsequent THA for osteoarthritis.MethodsThis is a matched retrospective cohort study of THA between 43 patients who suffered a prior intertrochanteric fracture successfully managed with internal fixation and 43 patients without prior hip fracture. Mean age was 73.6 vs 74.2 years. A conventional cementless THA was used in both groups. Functional outcome was assessed by the Harris hip score (HHS) and reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire. Radiological assessment was also performed.ResultsMean follow-up was 6.6 (range, 5-8) years. The mean operative time and blood transfusion rate were significantly higher in the fracture group (P = .001), but there was no significant difference in the length of stay. HHS significantly improved in both groups. At final follow-up, HHS was significantly higher in nonfracture group (P = .008), but the rate of patients with excellent and good outcomes was similar (P = .616). Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at the final follow-up was not different between groups (P = .058). Complication rate was similar between groups. There were no revisions, dislocations, or loose implants in the study group.ConclusionCementless THA provided successful functional outcomes and implant durability at medium term in patients treated for osteoarthritis following healed intertrochanteric fracture fixation, comparable to those without prior fracture who underwent primary THA. Surgical complexity and complication rate were low.