Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes between an isolated tibial component revision and total revision knee arthroplasty in aseptic loosening of an isolated tibial component

BackgroundAn isolated tibial component revision could be a treatment option for isolated tibial side loosening; however, few studies have proved its efficacy. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between isolated (tibial component) and total (femoral and tibial component) revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsBetween January 2008 and February 2017, 31 patients underwent revision TKA for isolated tibial side loosening; 14 underwent an isolated tibial component revision (isolated group) and 17 underwent total (both femoral and tibial components) revision surgery (total group). The postoperative range of motion (ROM), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, Knee Society knee score (KSKS), Knee Society function score (KSFS), and mechanical axis (MA) were compared between the two groups. The intraoperative tourniquet time and amount of blood drainage were also compared.ResultsThe mean follow-up durations in the isolated and total groups were 40.7 and 56.1 months, respectively. Both groups had similar postoperative ROM, WOMAC index, KSKS, KSFS, and MA; however, significantly shorter tourniquet time (105.2 vs. 154.6 min, P < 0.001) and less blood drainage (417.2 vs. 968.1 ml, P < 0.001) were noted in the isolated group than in the total group.ConclusionIsolated tibial component revision TKA for tibial component loosening showed comparable clinical and radiological outcomes to those of total revision TKA. The advantages of the isolated tibial component revision surgery were short operation time and small blood loss.Study designLevel III, Retrospective comparative study.     

High Midterm Survival Rate of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy: A Case-Control Study

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is technically more demanding than TKA in a native knee. Studies have reported increased intraoperative and postoperative complication of TKA with previous HTO. The aim of this study is to compare the survival and complication rates and functional outcomes of uncemented TKA with previous HTO to primary TKA at our institution over a decade.MethodsThis case-control study included 41 uncemented TKA after HTO between 2002 and 2012. For each case, 2 control patients were matched based on age and gender without previous HTO. The 2 groups were comparable for body mass index, as well as preoperative functional scores.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 7.8 ± 2.4 (range, 5-13.6) years. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in functional outcomes or radiological imaging, particularly the rate of radiological loosening. There was no significant difference in complications (9; 22%) in the group of TKA after HTO vs the control group (14; 17%). One revision was performed in the group of TKA after HTO for septic loosening, and no revisions in the control group. The survival rate at a mean follow-up of 8 years was 97.6% in the group TKA after HTO vs 100% in the control group.ConclusionUncemented TKAs following HTO have no significant difference in functional and radiological outcomes and survivorship compared to uncemented primary TKA at midterm follow-up.     

Anterior Knee Pain Following Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty With Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis and Patellar Resurfacing: Prevalence and Clinical Implications

BackgroundAnterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with patient dissatisfaction. Factors related to postoperative anterior knee pain and its impact on patient outcomes are poorly understood. The following are the aims of this study: (1) to report the prevalence of anterior knee pain before and after TKA using a posterior-stabilized prosthesis with routine patellar resurfacing; (2) to investigate the association of preoperative clinical factors with the presence of anterior knee pain after TKA; and (3) to explore the association of postoperative anterior knee pain with postoperative self-reported function and quality of life.MethodsThis retrospective study included 506 patients who had undergone elective primary unilateral TKA with a posterior-stabilized prosthesis and patellar resurfacing. Outcome measures prior to and 12 months after TKA included self-reported anterior knee pain, knee function, and quality of life.ResultsPrevalence of anterior knee pain was 72% prior to and 15% following TKA. Patients who had preoperative anterior knee pain had twice the risk of experiencing anterior knee pain after TKA than patients who did not have preoperative anterior knee pain (risk ratio: 2.37, 95% CI 1.73-2.96). Greater severity of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function were associated with the presence of postoperative anterior knee pain (rho = 0.15, P < .01; rho = 0.13, P < .01, respectively). Preoperative age, gender, and quality of life were not associated with postoperative anterior knee pain. Greater severity of postoperative anterior knee pain was associated with worse knee function at 12 months postoperative (rho = 0.49, P < .01).ConclusionOne in 7 patients reported anterior knee pain 12 months following posterior-stabilized and patella-resurfaced TKA. The presence of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function are associated with postoperative anterior knee pain.     

Does Recession of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Influence Outcome in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundFor a PCL-retaining (posterior cruciate ligament) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to function suitably, proper soft tissue balancing, including PCL recession, is required. Yet, when the recession of the PCL is needed, there is still a debate as to whether a cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA should be converted to a posterior-stabilized TKA due to the concern of instability and poorer clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine whether recession of the PCL adversely affects clinical outcomes in patients who undergo CR TKA.MethodsCR TKAs of the same design performed by the senior author (J.M.) were identified between December 2006 and July 2015. Clinical outcome measurements were collected and included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, the Knee Society Clinical Rating System, Short Form-12 Physical Composite Score/Mental Health Composite Score, and revision rates.ResultsThere were no significant differences in clinical outcome when the PCL was retained, partially recessed, or completely released during PCL-retaining TKA (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index: P = .54, Knee Society Clinical Rating System: P = .42, Short Form-12 Mental Health Composite Score: P = .89, Short Form-12 Physical Composite Score: P = .527).ConclusionThis study presents evidence of similar clinical outcomes when the PCL is retained or released during PCL-retaining TKA, provided attention is paid to appropriate soft tissue balancing. CR TKA undergoing partial or complete release of the PCL should not routinely be converted to a posterior-stabilized knee design.Level of EvidenceLevel II, Prognostic study.     

Cemented vs Uncemented Femoral Components: A Randomized,Controlled Trial at 10 Years Minimum Follow-Up

BackgroundThe type of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) fixation (cemented or uncemented) is still subject to debate. The aim of this study is to assess the survival rate, clinical outcomes, and radiological results of TKA according to the fixation type.MethodsA total of 130 patients were randomly assigned to either the cement group (cemented femoral and tibial implants) or the hybrid group (cemented tibial implant, uncemented femoral implant). The inclusion criteria were patients between 50 and 90 years old who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis between 2004 and 2005 without a history of open knee surgery. Revisions and complications were reported, as well as clinical scores and radiological signs of loosening.ResultsOne hundred eighteen patients had complete data at 10 years of minimum follow-up (59 in each group). The mean age was 72 years old. The mean follow-up was 13 years. The survival rate was 98% at 13 years in both groups (1 aseptic loosening at 2 years in the cement group, 1 septic loosening in the hybrid group). The complication rate in the cement group was 8.5% (n = 5) vs 12.1% (n = 7) in the hybrid group (P = .8). The clinical results were not significantly different. In the cement group, 25% of patients (n = 15) had radiolucent lines at 10 years. In the hybrid group, 33% of patients had bone transparencies, not evolving or symptomatic.ConclusionAt a minimum follow-up of 10 years, there were no significant differences between cemented TKA and hybrid TKA for the survivorship, the complication rate, the clinical scores, or the radiological signs of loosening.Level of EvidenceI.     

Single-Stage Revision of the Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Improved Functional Outcomes: A Propensity Score–Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundSingle-stage revision is an alternative to the standard 2-stage revision, potentially minimizing morbidities and improving functional outcomes. This study aimed at comparing single-stage and 2-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with regard to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication rates.Methods:A total of 185 consecutive revision TKA patients for chronic PJI with complete preoperative and postoperative PROMs were investigated. A total of 44 patients with single-stage revision TKA were matched to 88 patients following 2-stage revision TKA using propensity score matching, yielding a total of 132 propensity score–matched patients for analysis. Patient demographics and clinical information including reinfection and readmission rates were evaluated.Results:There was no significant difference in preoperative PROMs between propensity score–matched single-stage and 2-stage revision TKA cohorts. Postoperatively, significantly higher PROMs for single-stage revision TKA were observed for Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score physical function (62.2 vs 51.9, P < .01), physical function short form 10A (42.8 vs 38.1, P < .01), PROMIS SF Physical (44.8 vs 41.0, P = .01), and PROMIS SF Mental (50.5 vs 47.1, P = .02). There was no difference between propensity score–matched single-stage and 2-stage revision TKA cohorts for clinical outcomes including reinfection rates (25.0% vs 27.2%, P = .78) and 90-day readmission rates (22.7% vs 25.0%, P = .77).ConclusionThis study illustrated that single-stage revision TKA for chronic PJI may be associated with superior patient-reported outcomes compared to 2-stage revision for the infected TKA using a variety of PROMs. Improved PROMs were not accompanied by differences in complication rates between both cohorts, suggesting that single-stage revision TKA may provide an effective alternative to 2-stage revision in patients with chronic TKA PJI.     

Influence of Intraoperative Medial Collateral Ligament Bony Avulsion Injury on the Outcome of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is (1) to find the clinical and radiological outcome of intraoperative bony avulsion of medial collateral ligament (MCL) treated with screw and washer construct and (2) to predict the preoperative factors which may contribute to the avulsion-type MCL injury during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsIntraoperative MCL avulsion injury occurred in 46 (0.8%) of the 4916 consecutive primary TKA from January 2011 to December 2015. After exclusion, the 41 knees were matched 1:2 with controls without MCL injury and compared for the various clinical, radiological, and functional parameters. The clinical parameters analyzed were age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis like osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, range of motion, sagittal deformity, and vitamin D levels. The radiological parameters calculated were coronal deformity, proximal tibial varus angle, distal femur valgus angle, joint line congruence angle, posterior tibial slope, “cup and saucer” morphology, presence or absence of knee subluxation, tibia vara, and femoral bowing. The preoperative and postoperative Knee Society Score and Knee Society Functional Score were analyzed. Complications or revisions, if any, were noted during the follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the preoperative risk factors for MCL avulsion injury.ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 58.4 ± 19.3 months, there were no radiological or physical examination findings of instability. Compared to the preoperative disability, there was a statistically significant improvement in clinical scores (Knee Society Score and Knee Society Functional Score) in the final follow-up (P < .001) in both cases and the control group. The mean preoperative coronal deformity was 170.6 ± 6.96 in the study group and 167.7 ± 4.3 in the control group (P = .021). The mean preoperative tibial slope was 10.5 ± 4.9 in the study group and 7.91 ± 4.15 in the control group (P = .003). The preoperative knee subluxation was present in 48.8% knees (P < .001) and “cup and saucer” morphology in 68.3 knees (P < .001) in the study group. The adjusted odds of MCL avulsion injury were greater for severe varus deformity (odds ratio [OR] 1.462, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.86), knee subluxation (OR 39.78, 95% CI 3.78-418.86), and “cup and saucer” morphology (OR 33.11, 95% CI 5.69-192.66).ConclusionIntraoperative MCL bony avulsion injury can be managed successfully with screw and washer construct without the need for increased prosthetic constraint in primary TKA. The presence of severe varus deformity, knee subluxation, and “cup and saucer” morphology tend to have an increased chance of MCL avulsion injury.     

Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes

BackgroundWhether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of radiographic alignment leading to improved patient satisfaction and implant survivorship in the long term has thus far been inconclusive.MethodsWe retrospectively compared the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 84 knees that had undergone robot-assisted TKA using ROBODOC vs 79 knees that had undergone conventional TKA. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 129.1 months (range: 108-147 months). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society Score and 36-item Short Form Survey, as well as by assessing the range of motion, operation time, and complications. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by assessing the hip-knee-ankle angle, coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial components, and any radiologic abnormalities such as loosening or osteolysis.ResultsThere was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. The prevalence of an outlier for the hip-knee-ankle angle in the robot-assisted group was 10.7%, whereas it was 16.5% in the conventional group (P = .172). The other component alignments (α°, β°, γ°, δ°) revealed a tendency toward a lower rate of outliers in the robot-assisted group, but without statistical significance (P > .05). In addition, there was no significant difference in complications, including revision surgery, between both groups.ConclusionRobot-assisted TKA does not improve long-term clinical or radiologic outcomes compared with conventional TKA.     

No Difference in Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship for Robotic,Navigational, and Conventional Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years

BackgroundComputer-assisted surgery, including robotic and navigational total knee arthroplasty (TKA), has been proposed as a technique used to improve alignment of implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes during a minimum follow-up period of 10 years among robotic, navigational, and conventional TKA.MethodsA total of 855 knees (robotic group, 194; conventional group, 270; and navigational group, 391) were available for physical and radiological examinations over a mean follow-up period of 10 years. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method based on the survival endpoint. The Hospital for Special Surgery score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Society Score, and range of motion were used for clinical evaluation. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis angle, the coronal inclination of femoral and tibial components, and the presence of radiolucent lines were also assessed at the final follow-up.ResultsAll clinical assessments at the final follow-up revealed improvements in the three groups without any significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05). The cumulative 10-year survival rate was 97.4% in the robotic group, 96.6% in the conventional group, and 98.2% in the navigational group, with no significant difference (p = 0.447). The rates of complication-associated surgery were not significantly different among the groups (p = 0.907). Only the proportion of outliers in the HKA axis angle showed a significant difference (p = 0.001), but other radiological outcomes were not significantly different among the three groups.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated satisfactory survival rates for robotic, navigational, and conventional TKAs and similar clinical outcomes during the long-term follow-up. Larger studies with continuous serial data are needed to confirm these findings.     

Preoperative Radiological Parameters Predicting the Need for Lateral Retinacular Release in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundProper patellar tracking is essential for well-functioning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Besides implanting components in the correct position and rotation, balancing parapatellar soft tissues is also important in aiding normal patellar tracking. Patellar maltracking during TKA can be improved by lateral retinacular release (LRR).MethodsWe studied the incidence of LRR in consecutive primary TKA with nonresurfaced patella and posterior-stabilized implant design. We analyzed data from 250 consecutive primary TKAs (212 patients) from January 2016 to May 2016. We evaluated the preoperative radiological parameters like patellar tilt, patellar shift, patellar morphology, Insall-Salvati ratio, femoro-tibial angle, distal femoral valgus angle, and proximal tibia varus angle which predict the need for LRR during TKA. We used multivariate regression analysis to find the association of individual radiological parameters and the LRR.ResultsThe need for LRR is significantly associated with preoperative radiological parameters like patellar shift and patellar tilt (P < .001). Compared to the nonreleased group, the adjusted odds of LRR were greater for morphological parameters like Wiberg type 3 patella (odds ratio [OR] 17.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.21-42.20), lateral facet thinning (OR 4.38, 95% CI 2.37-8.07), lateral patellofemoral arthritis (OR 14.36, 95% CI 6.82-30.23), and coronal valgus deformity (OR 4.95, 95% CI 1.60-10.68).ConclusionPreoperative assessment of these radiological parameters in the axial view implies a high chance of tight lateral retinacular structures. This helps in identifying patients who have a higher likelihood for patellar maltracking during TKA. Appropriate LRR helps to provide better patellar tracking post TKA.     

No Difference in Postoperative Knee Flexion and Patient Joint Awareness Between Cruciate-Substituting and Cruciate-Retaining Medial Pivot Total Knee Prostheses: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

BackgroundThis study aimed to clarify differences in clinical results, including in patients’ joint awareness, between cruciate-substituting (CS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) medial pivot total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over a 10-year follow-up.MethodsA total of 333 TKAs were included in this study. There were 257 cases of CS and 76 cases of CR TKAs. Knee range of motion, Knee Society Score, and radiological outcomes were assessed. The patients’ joint awareness was evaluated using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 at the final follow-up. The survival rate with respect to reoperation or revision was analyzed.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 10 ± 1.7 years, and the loss to follow-up was 5.4%. All clinical outcomes improved significantly after surgery in both groups (P < .001). Postoperative knee flexion was 118° ± 13° in the CS group and 116° ± 10° in the CR group (P = .10). The mean Forgotten Joint Score-12 scores were 57 ± 27 points in the CS group and 56 ± 28 points in the CR group (P = .59). Ten years after the operation, the survival rates for reoperation were 96.3% in the CS group and 94.2% in the CR group (P = .61), and those for revision were 98.4% and 98.7% in the CS and CR groups, respectively (P = .87). Other postoperative clinical results did not differ between the 2 groups.ConclusionIn this 10-year follow-up study, medial pivot TKA, regardless of polyethylene insert type, showed a high survival rate and good patient awareness of the prosthetic joint.     

Long-Term Outcome Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Indication for Revision

BackgroundThere is limited information about long-term clinical outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in relation to the indication for revision. Previously, a clear relation between indication for revision and clinical outcome was shown after 2 years. Present study evaluated (1) whether the reported association at 2 year remains present at 7.5 years, and (2) how clinical outcome at 7.5 years developed compared to baseline and 2-year follow-up, and (3) whether patients had additional adverse events.MethodsA cohort of 129 patients with a total system revision TKA was selected. Range of motion, Visual Analog Scale for pain and satisfaction, and clinical and functional Knee Society Score were obtained preoperatively, at 3 months, 1, 2, and 7.5 years. Reasons for revision were septic loosening, aseptic loosening, malposition, instability, and severe stiffness.ResultsPatients revised for severe stiffness had significantly worse outcomes. No difference was found between the other indications. The clinical outcome after revision TKA at 7.5 years remained stable for septic and aseptic loosening, malposition, and instability but deteriorated slightly for the severe stiffness group. Visual Analog Scale satisfaction remained constant for all indications. There were 11 additional complications between 2- and 7.5-year follow-up, 9 of which necessitated reoperation.ConclusionAll indications except severe stiffness had a similar clinical outcome which was maintained up to 7.5-year follow-up. The severe stiffness group had worse outcomes and deteriorated slightly at longer follow-up. Outcome at 3 months seems predictive for long-term outcome. Additional complications did not differ significantly for the different reasons for revision.Level of EvidenceLevel III, prognostic study.     

In Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty,Failure to Recreate Native Tibial Alignment Is Associated With Early Revision

BackgroundThe goal of kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to restore native knee anatomy. However, there are concerns about patellofemoral tracking problems with this technique that lead to early revision. We measured the differences between preoperative anatomic alignment and postoperative component alignment in a consecutive series of KA TKA and evaluated the association between alignment changes and the likelihood of early revision.MethodsThe charts of 219 patients who underwent 275 KA TKA procedures were reviewed. Preoperative anatomic alignment and postoperative tibial and femoral component alignment were measured radiographically. The difference in component alignment compared with preoperative anatomic alignment was compared between patients who underwent aseptic revision and those who did not at a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created for statistically significant variables, and the Youden index was used to determine optimal alignment thresholds with regard to likelihood of revision surgery.ResultsChange in tibial component alignment compared with native alignment was greater (P = .005) in the revision group (5.0° ± 3.7° of increased varus compared with preoperative anatomic tibial angle) than in the nonrevision group (1.3° ± 4.2° of increased varus). The Youden index indicated that increasing tibial varus by >2.2° or more is associated with increased likelihood of revision. Preoperative anatomic alignment and change in femoral alignment and overall joint alignment (ie, Q angle) were not associated with increased likelihood of revision.ConclusionSmall increases in tibial component varus compared with native alignment are associated with early aseptic revision in patients undergoing KA TKA.     

Satisfactory Outcomes of All-Poly Fixed Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Avascular Osteonecrosis Versus Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Study With 10 to 22 Years of Follow-up

BackgroundWhile good mid-term results for treating spontaneous knee osteonecrosis (SPONK) with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) have been reported, concerns remain about implant survival at long-term. This study aimed to compare outcomes and survivorship of UKA for SPONK vs osteoarthritis at a minimum of 10 years.MethodsThis case-control study included medial UKA for femoral SPONK operated between 1996 and 2010 with a minimum 10-year follow-up (n = 47). Each case was matched with a medial UKA for osteoarthritis based on body mass index (BMI), gender, and age. Knee Society Score (KSS), complications and radiological (loosening) data were collected at the last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed using revision implant removal as endpoint.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range 10 to 21 years). Mean age and BMI were 72.9 ± 8.4 years and 25.5 ± 3.6 Kg/m² in SPONK group. At last follow-up, knee and function KSS were 89.5 ± 12 and 79 ± 18 in SPONK group vs 90 ± 15 (P = .85) and 81.7 ± 17 (P = .47) in control group. Complications and radiological results showed no significant differences. The survival rate free from any revision was 85.1% at last follow-up in SPONK group and 93.6% in control group (P = .23). The leading cause for revision was aseptic tibial loosening (57.1%) in SPONK group. The 15-year survival estimate was 83% in SPONK group.ConclusionSatisfactory clinical outcomes at long-term after UKA for femoral SPONK were observed, similar to those after UKA for osteoarthritis, despite a higher risk of tibial loosening in the SPONK group. No symptomatic femoral loosening leading to a revision was observed.Level of EvidenceIV.     

Isolated Versus Full Component Revision in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening

BackgroundRevision of both femoral and tibial components of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for aseptic loosening has favorable outcomes. Revision of only one loose component with retention of others has shorter operative time and lower cost; however, implant survivorship and clinical outcomes of these different operations are unclear.MethodsBetween January 2009 and December 2019, a consecutive cohort of revision TKA was reviewed. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to study correlations among factors and surgical related complications, time to prosthesis failure, and functional outcomes (University of California Los Angeles, Knee Society functional, knee osteoarthritis and outcome score for joint replacement, Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical, and VR-12 mental).ResultsA total of 238 patients underwent revision TKA for aseptic loosening. The mean follow-up time was 61 months (range 25 to 152). Ten of the 105 patients (9.5%) who underwent full revision (both femoral and tibial components) and 18 of the 133 (13.5%) who underwent isolated revision had subsequent prosthesis failure [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, P = .343]. The factor analysis of type of revision (full or isolated revision) did not demonstrate a significant difference between groups in terms of complications, implant failures, and times to failure. Metallosis was related to early time to failure [Hazard ratio 10.11, P < .001] and iliotibial band release was associated with more complications (Odds ratio 9.87, P = .027). Preoperative symptoms of instability were associated with the worst improvement in University of California Los Angeles score. Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists status and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index were related with worse VR-12 physical (?30.5, P = .008) and knee osteoarthritis and outcome score for joint replacement (?4.2, P = .050) scores, respectively.ConclusionIsolated and full component revision TKA for aseptic loosening does not differ with respect to prosthesis failures, complications, and clinical results at 5 years. Poor American Society of Anesthesiologists status, increased comorbidities, instability, and a severe bone defect are related to worse functional improvement.Level of evidenceIII, cohort with control.     

Does the Use of Intraoperative Pressure Sensors for Knee Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Improve Clinical Outcomes? A Comparative Study With a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundIt is undetermined whether using sensors for knee balancing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of sensor balance (SB) with manual balance (MB) TKA with a minimum two-year follow-up.MethodsA consecutive series of 207 MB TKAs was compared with 222 SB TKAs between April 2014 and April 2017. A single surgeon performed all surgeries, using the same prosthesis. The primary end point was the aggregated mean change in four subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS₄) between preoperative and two-year time points. Secondary outcomes included mean differences between groups in all five KOOS subscales, proportions of knee balancing procedures, and rates of reoperations including revisions and manipulations for stiffness.ResultsThe mean changes in the KOOS₄ aggregated means for MB TKA (42.4; standard deviation, 29.1) and SB TKA (41.5; standard deviation, 25.0) were not significantly different (mean difference, 0.9; 95% confidence interval: –2.6 to 4.4, P = .62). There were significantly more balancing procedures in the SB group (55.9% versus 16.9%; P < .01). There were no significant differences in the number of reoperations (1.4% SB versus 1.4% MB; P = .71) or manipulations for stiffness (3.7% SB versus 4.4% MB; P = .69).ConclusionThe use of sensors in TKA to achieve knee balance did not result in improved clinical outcomes, despite significantly increasing the number of surgical interventions required to achieve a balanced knee. Sensors did not alter the rates of revision surgery or requirements for manipulation. It remains to be determined whether precise soft-tissue balancing improves prosthetic survivorship and joint biomechanics.     

Survivorship of 500 Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasties in Patients Under 55 Years of Age

BackgroundWith respect to survivorship following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), joint registries consistently demonstrate higher revision rates for both genders in those aged less than 55 years. The present study analyzed the survivorship of 500 cementless TKAs performed in this age group in a high-volume primary joint unit where cementless TKA has traditionally been used for the majority of patients.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of 500 consecutive TKAs performed in patients aged less than 55 years between March 1994 and April 2017. The primary outcome measures for the study were survivorship and all-cause revisions. Secondary outcome measures included nonrevision procedures, clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes.ResultsAn all-cause survival rate of 98.4% and an aseptic survival rate of 99.2% at a median time of 10.7 years (interquartile range 7.3-14.9, range 0.2-27.7) were found. Four patents were revised for infection, 2 for stiffness, 1 for aseptic loosening of the tibial component, and 1 for a patella that was resurfaced for anterior knee pain. Thirty four patients (6.8%) had a nonrevision procedure with manipulation under anesthetic accounting for 27. On a multivariate analysis, preoperative range of motion and female gender were negatively associated with postoperative range of motion (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). Sixty seven patients (17.3%) had radioluscent lines and on a multivariate analysis, there were no significant predictors of radiolucent lines.ConclusionCementless TKA in the young patient can achieve excellent clinical and functional outcomes. At a median of 10.7 years, aseptic revision rates are exceptionally low at 0.8% for the entire cohort.     

Design Modifications of the Posterior-Stabilized Knee System May Reduce Anterior Knee Pain and Complications Following Total Knee Replacement

Background

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), advances in posterior-stabilized (PS) knee implant designs address patellofemoral mechanics and cam–post engagement in an effort to reduce patellofemoral pain and improve knee kinematics. Such modifications may include improved femoral rollback, improved femoral dislocation resistance, minimized wear, and improved longevity.

Questions/Purposes

In this study, we compared a newer PS knee design that incorporates a left and right specific femoral component and smoother trochlear groove to improve patellofemoral mechanics with an older PS design in order to assess patellofemoral pain, manipulation rates, and revision rates.

Methods

Using an institutional database, we retrospectively identified TKAs performed by the same surgeon using the Logic^® PS knee system and the older Optetrak PS knee system (Exactech Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA), with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes for each cohort were measured using the Knee Society Clinical Rating System, University of California Los Angeles Activity Scale, pain visual analog scale (VAS), Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. In addition, rates of anterior knee pain, manipulation, and revision were compared between the two knee systems, and a Kaplan–Meier survivorship curve defining failure as need for revision was calculated to allow comparison between the cohorts.

Results

From 2000 to 2018, there were 1482 TKAs performed using the Logic PS (not counting 12 patients who had died) and 445 in the Optetrak PS group (not counting 20 patients who had died). In the Logic PS and Optetrak PS groups, respectively, the average age at operation was 66.7 years and 68.6 years and the average body mass index was 30.8 and 31.2. Pain VAS scores were significantly lower in the Logic PS group than in the Optetrak group (1.72 vs. 2.75 out of 10, respectively). There was also a significant difference in the percentages of patients reporting anterior knee pain in the Logic group, as compared with the Optetrak group (5.6% vs. 11.8%, respectively). In addition, manipulation rates differed significantly between the Logic and Optetrak groups (0.34% vs. 10.70%, respectively). The revision rates were 1.15% for the Logic group and 2.0% for the Optetrak group. However, there was a significant difference in rates of revision performed because of osteolysis, favoring the Logic group (0.07% vs. 0.6%). The Kaplan–Meier survivorship curve shows a significant difference in time until revision between the Logic and Optetrak groups.

Conclusion

Design modifications to improve patellofemoral mechanics demonstrated significant improvements in overall pain and patellofemoral pain and reduced manipulation rates post-operatively.

     

Advantage of Minimal Anterior Knee Pain and Long-term Survivorship of Cemented Single Radius Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty without Patella Resurfacing

BackgroundThe single radius total knee prosthesis was introduced with the advantage of reduced patellar symptoms; however, there is no long-term follow-up study of the same. The purpose of this study was to determine the survival rate of single radius posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty and patellofemoral complication rates in a consecutive series.MethodsSeventy-one patients (103 knees) who underwent arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing using a single radius posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis were followed up for a minimum 10 years. Clinical evaluation using Knee Society knee and function scores and radiologic evaluation were performed at regular intervals. Anterior knee pain as well as patellofemoral complications were evaluated with a simple questionnaire. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to estimate survival.ResultsSeventeen patients (23 knees) were excluded due to death (12 knees) or lost to follow-up (11 knees). Of the 80 knees enrolled, all femoral components and 78 tibial components were well fixed without loosening at final follow-up. Two revisions were performed because of tibial component loosening and periprosthetic joint infection. One patient with tibial component loosening refused to have revision surgery. No obvious tibial insert polyethylene wear was observed. The survivorships at 132 months were 96.7% using revision or pending revision as end points. Anterior knee pain was present in 6 patients (6 knees, 7.5%) at the latest follow-up. No patellofemoral complication requiring revision was encountered.ConclusionsThe single radius posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis demonstrated an excellent minimum 10-year survivorship. The low rates of implant loosening and 7.5% of anterior knee pain as a patellofemoral complication are comparable with those reported for other modern total knee prosthesis.     

Intermediate-Term Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundBoth cones or sleeves have been developed to address metaphyseal bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but few studies have directly compared the outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship and aseptic revision rates between metaphyseal cones and sleeves at intermediate follow-up.MethodsWe reviewed a consecutive series of 1,172 revision TKA patients between 2009 and 2018 with a minimum two-year follow-up on all patients. We compared demographics, surgical indication, stem fixation, constraint, rates of rerevision, and Short-Form-12 scores between patients with cones and sleeves. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the effect of cones and sleeves on aseptic rerevision. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare aseptic survivorship of cones and sleeves.ResultsThere were 194 tibial cones (17%), 107 tibial sleeves (9%), 31 femoral cones (3%), and 135 femoral sleeves (12%) with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years (range: 2-12 years). There was no difference in demographics, indication, stem fixation, or constraint (P > .05). Although overall aseptic failure rates may be lower for tibial sleeves, there were no significant differences in survivorship over a one-year, two-year, and five-year follow-up when both tibial and femoral sleeves were directly compared to cones.ConclusionBoth tibial and femoral sleeves and cones perform well at an intermediate-term follow-up. Further investigation of these two are required to better understand their survivorship relative to each other.