Apomorphine-induced behavioural sensitization in rats: individual differences, role of dopamine and NMDA receptors

Apomorphine-induced behavioural sensitization was studied in male Wistar rats. The acute administration of apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg s.c.), a dopamine agonist, did not affect the locomotor activity of rats, but it caused stereotyped behaviour characterized by repeated gnawing, licking and sniffing. A significant increase in the locomotor activity became evident after repeated treatments with apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg twice daily for 14 days). However, there were marked individual differences in the sensitization of rats to apomorphine. One third of animals did not react with increased locomotor activity even after the 2-week administration of apomorphine, whereas the other one third needed only a few injections to display increased behavioural response to apomorphine. The behavioural response of the remaining one third of rats was between weak and strong responders. Simultaneously, the stereotyped behaviour occurred earlier and its intensity tended to be lower after repeated treatment with apomorphine. Nevertheless, the established changes of stereotyped behaviour did not correlate with the increase of locomotor activity. The administration of amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.), an indirect dopamine agonist, but not a non-competitive NMDA antagonist dizocilpine (0.25 mg/kg i.p.), tended to cause a similar response profile with apomorphine in sensitized rats. The ED₅₀ values of the dopamine antagonists blocking apomorphine-induced increase in the locomotor activity were the following: 0.09 mg/kg for raclopride (dopamine D₂ antagonist), 0.023 mg/kg for SCH 23390 (dopamine D₁ antagonist), 6.42 mg/kg for clozapine (dopamine D₄ antagonist). This supports the involvement of D₁ and D₂ receptors in the expression of apomorphine-induced behavioural sensitization. The concomitant administration of dizocilpine (0.5 mg/kg), SCH 23390 (0.05 mg/kg), raclopride (0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (20 mg/kg) with apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg twice daily for 2 weeks) antagonized the development of behavioural sensitization to apomorphine. Accordingly, at least three different molecular targets, namely dopamine D₁ and D₂, and NMDA receptors, are involved in the development of apomorphine-induced behavioural sensitization.     

Activation of spinal histamine H3 receptors inhibits mechanical nociception

Previous studies have suggested a possible pain-modulatory role for histamine H₃ receptors, but the localization of these receptors and nature of this modulation is not clear. In order to explore the role of spinal histamine H₃ receptors in the inhibition of nociception, the effects of systemically (subcutaneous, s.c.) and intrathecally (i.t.) administered histamine H₃ receptor agonists were studied in rats and mice. Immepip (5 mg/kg, s.c.) produced robust antinociception in rats on a mechanical (tail pinch) test but did not alter nociceptive responses on a thermal (tail flick) test. In contrast, this treatment in mice (immepip, 5 and 30 mg/kg, s.c.) did not change either mechanically or thermally evoked nociceptive responses. When administered directly into the spinal subarachnoid space, immepip (15–50 μg, i.t.) and R--methylhistamine (50 μg, i.t.) had no effect in rats on the tail flick and hot plate tests, but produced a dose- and time-dependent inhibition (90–100%) of nociceptive responses on the tail pinch test. This attenuation was blocked by administration of thioperamide (10 mg/kg, s.c.), a histamine H₃ receptor antagonist. Intrathecally administered thioperamide also reversed antinociceptive responses induced by systemically administered immepip, which demonstrates a spinal site of action for the histamine H₃ receptor agonist. In addition, intrathecally administered immepip (25 μg) produced maximal antinociception on the tail pinch test in wild type, but not in histamine H₃ receptor knockout (H₃KO) mice. These findings demonstrate an antinociceptive role for spinal histamine H₃ receptors. Further studies are needed to confirm the existence of modality-specific (i.e. mechanical vs. thermal) inhibition of nociception by these receptors, and to assess the efficacy of spinally delivered histamine H₃ receptor agonists for the treatment for pain.     

Corrigendum to ‘Antinociceptive effects of the selective non-peptide δ-opioid receptor agonist TAN-67 in diabetic mice’ [Eur. J. Pharmacol. 276 (1995) 131–135]

The antinociceptive potencies of 2-methyl-4a-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,12,12a-octahydro-quinolino[2,3,3-g]isoquinoline (TAN-67), a non-peptidic δ-opioid receptor agonist, were examined using the acetic acid abdominal constriction test and the tail-flick test in diabetic mice. TAN-67, at doses of 3–100 mg/kg, i.p., produced a marked and dose-dependent inhibition of the number of acetic acid-induced abdominal constrictions in both non-diabetic and diabetic mice. The antinociceptive effect of TAN-67 in the acetic acid abdominal constriction test in diabetic mice was greater than that in non-diabetic mice. Indeed, the ED₅₀ (95% confidence limits) value of TAN-67 for the inhibition of acetic acid-induced abdominal constrictions in diabetic mice (6.0 (3.5–10.5) mg/kg) was significantly lower than that in non-diabetic mice (31.4 (14.2–69.4) mg/kg). The antinociceptive effect of TAN-67 was not antagonized by pretreatment with either β-funaltrexamine, a selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist, or nor-binaltorphimine, a selective κ-opioid receptor antagonist. When 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.), a selective δ₁-opioid receptor antagonist, was administered 10 min before treatment with TAN-67, the antinociceptive effect of TAN-67 was significantly antagonized. However, naltriben, a selective δ₂-opioid receptor antagonist, had no significant effect on the antinociceptive effect of TAN-67. Furthermore, in the tail-flick test, TAN-67 at doses of 3–30 mg/kg, i.p., also produced a marked and dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in diabetic mice, but not in non-diabetic mice. In conclusion, TAN-67 produced an antinociceptive effect through the activation of δ₁-opioid receptors. Furthermore, the results of this study support our hypothesis that mice with diabetes are selectively hyperresponsive to δ₁-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception.     

Antinociceptive effects of Nigella sativa oil and its major component, thymoquinone, in mice

The antinociceptive effects of Nigella sativa oil and its major component, thymoquinone, were examined in mice. The p.o. administration of N. sativa oil (50-400 mg/kg) dose-dependently suppressed the nociceptive response in the hot-plate test, tail-pinch test, acetic acid-induced writhing test and in the early phase of the formalin test. The systemic administration (2.5-10 mg/kg, p.o. and 1-6 mg/kg, i.p.) and the i.c.v. injection (1-4 microgram/mouse) of thymoquinone attenuated the nociceptive response in not only the early phase but also the late phase of the formalin test. Naloxone injected s.c. (1 mg/kg) significantly blocked N. sativa oil- and thymoquinone-induced antinociception in the early phase of the formalin test. Moreover, the i.c.v. injection of naloxone (10 microgram/mouse), the mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist, naloxonazine (1-5 microgram/mouse), or the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist, nor-binaltorphimine (1-5 microgram/mouse), significantly reversed thymoquinone-induced antinociception in the early phase but not the late phase of the formalin test, whereas the delta-opioid receptor antagonist, naltrindole (1-5 ng/mouse, i.c.v.), had no effect on either phase. The antinociceptive effect of morphine was significantly reduced in thymoquinone- and N. sativa oil-tolerant mice, but not vice versa. These results suggest that N. sativa oil and thymoquinone produce antinociceptive effects through indirect activation of the supraspinal mu(1)- and kappa-opioid receptor subtypes.     

The antinociceptive effect of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the arthritic rat involves the CB(2) cannabinoid receptor

Cannabinoid CB₂ receptors have been implicated in antinociception in animal models of both acute and chronic pain. We evaluated the role both cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors in mechanonociception in non-arthritic and arthritic rats. The antinociceptive effect of Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹THC) was determined in rats following administration of the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor-selective antagonist, SR141716A, the cannabinoid CB₂ receptor-selective antagonist, SR144528, or vehicle. Male Sprague–Dawley rats were rendered arthritic using Freund’s complete adjuvant and tested for mechanical hyperalgesia in the paw-pressure test. Arthritic rats had a baseline paw-pressure of 83 ± 3.6g versus a paw-pressure of 177 ± 6.42g in non-arthritic rats. SR144528 or SR141716A (various doses mg/kg; i.p.) or 1:1:18 (ethanol:emulphor:saline) vehicle were injected 1 h prior to Δ⁹THC (4mg/kg; i.p) or 1:1:18 vehicle and antinociception determined 30min post Δ⁹THC. AD₅₀'s for both antagonists were calculated with 95% confidence limits. In addition, midbrain and spinal cord were removed for determination of cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptor protein density in the rats. SR144528 significantly attenuated the antinociceptive effect of Δ⁹THC in the arthritic rats [AD₅₀ = 3.3 (2.7–4) mg/kg], but not in the non-arthritic rats at a dose of 10/mg/kg. SR141716A significantly attenuated Δ⁹THC-induced antinociception in both the non-arthritic [AD₅₀ = 1.4 (0.8–2) mg/kg] and arthritic rat [AD₅₀ = 2.6 (1.8–3.1) mg/kg]. SR141716A or SR144528 alone did not result in a hyperalgesic effect as compared to vehicle. Our results indicate that the cannabinoid CB₂ receptor plays a critical role in cannabinoid-mediated antinociception, particularly in models of chronic inflammatory pain.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of (-)-ephedrine in rats: analysis with catecholamine transporter and receptor ligands

A drug discrimination procedure was used to examine the neuropharmacology of (−)-ephedrine (5 mg/kg), a sympathomimetic amine found in a variety of dietary supplements. (−)-Ephedrine has caused concern because of its use as a precursor in the manufacture of street drugs (e.g. methamphetamine) and its potential for abuse and toxicity. In the present study, the catecholamine reuptake inhibitors mazindol and nomifensine, the norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor desipramine, and the dopamine D₂-like (e.g. D₂, D₃ and D₄) agonist quinpirole substituted for (−)-ephedrine (80% (−)-ephedrine-lever responding). The NE reuptake inhibitor nisoxetine, the D₁-like (e.g. D₁ and D₅) agonists (±)-SKF 38393 and SKF 82958, and the mixed D₁-/D₂-like agonist apomorphine occasioned intermediate levels of responding (50–79% (−)-ephedrine-lever responding). The (−)-ephedrine cue was antagonized by the D₁-like antagonist SCH 23390 and the ₁-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin as well as the D₂-like antagonists (−)-eticlopride and haloperidol, although only at doses that disrupted responding in some rats. The discriminative stimulus effects of a small dose of (−)-ephedrine (1.25 mg/kg) were enhanced by the ₂-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan and to a lesser extent by the β-adrenoceptor antagonist (−)-propranolol. However, the ₂-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine (0.04 mg/kg) did not attenuate the (−)-ephedrine stimulus. These results suggest that D₁-, D₂-like, and ₁-adrenergic receptors mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of (−)-ephedrine. Substitution of desipramine for (−)-ephedrine and not for some other stimulants suggests that NE transmission is a prominent feature of the (−)-ephedrine discriminative stimulus, and that NE underlies therapeutic and abuse-related effects of (−)-ephedrine that diverge from those of other stimulants.     

Mechanisms of L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester-induced antinociception in mice: a role for serotonergic and adrenergic neurons.

1. The mechanisms involved in the antinociceptive action of L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) were investigated in mice. 2. Intraperitoneal administration of L-NAME produced a dose-dependent antinociception in the tail-flick, hot-plate and phenyl-p-quinone-induced writhing tests. 3. Pretreatment with the catecholamine depletors 6-hydroxydopamine (5 micrograms i.c.v.) or reserpine (5 mg/kg i.p.) or the serotonin synthesis inhibitor, p-chlorophenylalanine methyl ester (200 mg/kg i.p. on 2 consecutive days) resulted in a significant decrease in the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME. 4. Similarly, pretreatment with the selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazonin (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.), or the non-selective alpha-adrenoceptor blocker, phentolamine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) antagonized the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME. 5. However, the administration of the selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan (2.5 mg/kg i.p.) was without effect. 6. Likewise, pretreatment with the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor blocker, ketanserin (1 mg/kg, i.p.), the D2 dopamine receptor antagonist (+/-) sulpiride (30 mg/kg, i.p.) or the opioid antagonist naloxone (5 mg/kg, i.p.) did not inhibit the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME. 7. These results suggest that L-NAME produces antinociception in the mouse probably by an action on adrenergic and serotonergic synapses.     

Reversal of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization by repeated administration of a dopamine D1 receptor agonist

Repeated intermittent administration of methamphetamine (MAP) produces an enduring hypersensitivity to the motor stimulant effect of MAP, termed behavioral sensitization. Dopamine plays a critical role in the development and expression of behavioral sensitization. Here, we investigated whether a dopamine D₁ receptor agonist could reverse behavioral sensitization to MAP. Administration of MAP (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) to rats once every 3 days for a total of 5 times (days 1–13) induced the enhancement of locomotor activity after MAP challenge (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) on day 20, verifying the development of behavioral sensitization. The MAP-sensitized rats then received a dopamine D₁ agonist, R-(+)-SKF38393 (3.0 mg/kg, i.p.), once a day for 7 consecutive days (days 21–27). Behavioral analysis on days 30 and 41 revealed that the enhanced locomotor activity was reversed by repeated R-(+)-SKF38393 administration. Moreover, repeated R-(+)-SKF38393 administration reversed the increased dopamine release in the striatum after MAP challenge on day 41. Thus, repeated administration of the dopamine D₁ receptor agonist induces the reversal of established behavioral sensitization to MAP and of increased dopamine release in the striatum, lasting for at least 2 weeks. Dopamine D₁ receptor agonists may be useful therapeutic agents for the treatment of psychostimulant addiction.     

A new and highly sensitive method for measuring 3-methoxytyramine using HPLC with electrochemical detection. Studies with drugs which alter dopamine metabolism in the brain

3-Methoxytyramine (3-MT) is a minor metabolite of dopamine which is suggested to reflect the turnover and utilization of dopamine. A novel, isocratic HPLC method has been developed which can be used to analyse 3-MT in homogenates of rat brain without the need for additional purification procedures. Furthermore, the coulometric electrochemical detection system is sensitive enough to measure 3 pg of 3-MT (equivalent to 0.6 ng/g tissue wet weight). 3-Methoxytyramine was measured in the striatum and n. accumbens after decapitation and rapid freezing, using 3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzylamine as the internal standard. The effects of dopaminergic and other drugs on this metabolite were examined using this method. -Methyl-p-tyrosine (200 mg/kg i.v.) produced parallel linear decreases in dopamine and 3-MT in naive rats, but not those pretreated with tranylcypromine (5 mg/kg i.p.). Methamphetamine (0.3–10 mg/kg i.p.) and amphetamine (0.3–10 mg/kg i.p.) both dose-dependently increased 3-MT in naive and tranylcypromine-pretreated rats. In naive animals, 3-MT was not altered by intraperitoneal injection of the dopamine reuptake inhibitors, bupropion (10 mg/kg) and nomifensine (10 mg/kg) or by sibutramine HCl (3 mg/kg), amitriptyline (10 mg/kg), desipramine (10 mg/kg) and zimeldine (10 mg/kg). 3-Methoxy-tyramine was decreased by apomorphine (5 mg/kg i.p.) and also by large doses of the selective D₂ antagonist, BRL 34778 (5 mg/kg i.p.) or -DOPA (50 mg/kg i.p.). The selective D₁ antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.1 or 5 mg/kg i.p.) was without effect. In tranylcypromine-pretreated rats, 3-MT was dose-dependently reduced and increased by apomorphine (0.01–5 mg/kg i.p.) and BRL 34778 (0.1–5 mg/kg i.p.), respectively. The drug SCH 23390 (0.1–5 mg/kg i.p.) produced much smaller increases in 3-MT which were probably mediated through the striatonigral pathway. Overall, the data suggest that measurement of 3-MT, after inhibition of monoamine oxidase, is a useful index of the release and utilization of dopamine. However, after substantial and prolonged depletion of dopamine, levels of 3-MT in naive animals are a better index. Also, the formation of 3-MT in naive rats provides a sensitive method for distinguishing between dopamine releasing agents and reuptake inhibitors.     

S 14297, a novel selective ligand at cloned human dopamine D3 receptors, blocks 7-OH-DPAT-induced hypothermia in rats

The selective dopamine D₃ receptor agonist, 7-OH-DPAT ((+)-7-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin) and the novel naphthofurane, S 14297 ((+)-[7-(N,N-dipropylamino)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-naphtho,2,3-furanel]) bound with high affinity and selectivity to recombinant, human dopamine D₃ versus D₂ receptors stably transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells: K_i values = 2 versus 103 nM for 7-OH-DPAT and 13 versus 297 nM for S 14297. In contrast, the putative dopamine D₃ receptor antagonist, AJ 76 (cis-(+)-5-methoxyl-1-methyl-2- (n-propylamino)tetralin), displayed low affinity and selectivity for dopamine D₃ versus D₂ sites (70 versus 154 nM). 7-OH-DPAT (0.01–0.16 mg/kg s.c.) provoked hypothermia in rats, and action abolished by S 14297 (0.04–0.63 mg/kg s.c.) and, less potently, by AJ 76 (0.16–2.5 mg/kg s.c.) S 14297 (20.0 mg/kg s.c.) did not modify prolactin secretion. These data suggest that dopamine D₃ receptors mediate hypothermia in the rat and that S 14297 acts as a selective antagonist at these sites.     

The involvement of central cholinergic system in (+)-matrine-induced antinociception in mice

The antinociceptive effect of (+)-matrine was examined in mice by writhing, tail-pressure and hot-plate tests. (+)-Matrine (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg s.c.) produced antinociception in a dose-dependent manner. In hot-plate test, the antinociception produced by (+)-matrine (10 mg/kg s.c.) was attenuated by muscarinic receptor antagonists atropine (5 mg/kg i.p.) and pirenzepine (0.1 mug/mouse i.c.v.) and acetylcholine depletor hemicholinium-3 (HC-3) (1 mug/mouse i.c.v.), but not by opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (2 mg/kg i.p.), dopamine D(2) receptor agonist (-)-quinpirole (0.1 mg/kg i.p.) or catecholamine depletor reserpine (2.5 mg/kg i.p.). Radioligand binding assay demonstrated that (+)-matrine had no affinity for mu-, kappa- or delta-opioid receptors in a wide concentration range (1 x 10(-11)-1 x 10(-3) M). The results suggest that (+)-matrine exerts its antinociceptive effect through multiple mechanism(s) such as increasing cholinergic activation in the CNS rather than acting on opioid receptors directly.     

In vivo assessment of release and metabolism of dopamine in the ventrolateral striatum of awake rats following administration of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists and antagonists

The ability of specific dopamine (DA) receptor agonists and antagonists to modify the release and metabolism of DA in the ventrolateral striatum of awake rats was assessed using in vivo microdialysis. The specific DA D₂ receptor antagonist, raclopride (0.1, 0.5 and 2.0mg/kg, i.p.), dose-dependently increased release of DA and levels of the metabolites DOPAC and HVA, while the D₂ receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg), decreased levels of DA, DOPAC and HVA. The DA D₁ receptor antagonist, SCH23390 ([R + (+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-o]) (0.01, 0.05 and 0.25 mg/kg), produced an increase in DA, DOPAC and HVA but of a lesser magnitude than raclopride. The D₁ agonist SKF38393 (1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol) (1.0, 3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg) failed to affect the release of metabolism of DA at any dose. These results support previous findings that activation of D₂ receptors has greater control over in vivo DA function, than drugs specifically affecting D₁ receptors.     

Behavioural analysis of changes in nociceptive thresholds produced by remoxipride in sheep and rats

The antinociceptive potential of remoxipride was investigated in sheep and rats with concurrent motor function assessments. Previous studies of sheep given intravenous remoxipride have revealed increases in mechanical nociceptive thresholds. Here, further investigation in sheep demonstrated elevated thermal nociceptive thresholds with no effect on subjectively assessed sedation or motor impairment scores. However, in rats, the dose of remoxipride (100 mg/kg i.p.) required to produce nociceptive thresholds similar to those elicited by morphine (30 mg/kg i.p.), itself reduced rotarod performance. Medetomidine (200 μg/kg i.p.) evoked sedation without influencing rotarod performance or antinociception. The antinociceptive, motor deficit and cataleptogenic actions of remoxipride were similar to those induced by two other dopamine antagonists, haloperidol (5 mg/kg) and raclopride (16 mg/kg i.p). Tocainide (100 mg/kg i.p.) induced thermal antinociception with normal rotarod performance and no catalepsy suggesting that Na⁺ channel blockade by remoxipride is not responsible for the changes in nociceptive thresholds. This study emphasizes the importance of motor function assessment during acute antinociceptive testing.     

The involvement of endogenous opioid mechanisms in the antinociceptive effects induced by antidepressant drugs, desipramine and trimipramine

The present study was designed to investigate the involvement of endogenous opioid systems in the antinociception induced by the antidepressant drugs, desipramine and trimipramine. For this purpose, the antinociceptive effects of desipramine (7.5 and 15.0 mg/kg i.p.) and trimipramine (5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg i.p.) were compared to that induced by morphine (0.2 and 2.0 mg/kg i.p.) in the tail-clip model in mice. Naloxone (0.3 and 3.0 mg/kg i.p.), a non-specific opioid receptor antagonist, inhibited morphine-induced antinociception in mice, whereas the antinociceptive effects of antidepressant drugs were found to be resistant to naloxone blockade to some extent, since only the higher concentration of naloxone (3.0 mg/kg i.p.) caused significant inhibition of the effects of antidepressant drugs. In contrast, naltrindole (1.0 mg/kg i.p.), a specific delta-receptor antagonist, inhibited antinociception induced by desipramine and trimipramine in this test, while it inhibited the antinociceptive effect of morphine only partly. None of the opioid antagonists produced a significant effect in the tail-clip experiment when they were injected alone. Based on these findings, we concluded that endogenous opioids are involved in the antinociceptive effects of the antidepressant drugs using different mechanisms.     

Contribution of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonism of 8-OH-DPAT and EMD 128130 to the regulation of haloperidol-induced muscle rigidity in rats

The aim of the present study was to find out whether (±)-8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a prototypical 5-HT_1A agonist, and (R)-(−)-2-[5-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-pyridylmethylaminomethyl]-chromane HCl (EMD 128130), a compound with serotonin 5-HT_1A-agonist and dopamine D₂-like antagonist properties, are able to attenuate the haloperidol-induced (1 mg/kg) muscle rigidity in rats. Muscle tone was examined using a combined mechano- and electromyographic (EMG) method that simultaneously measured the mechanical muscle resistance (MMG) of the rat’s hind foot to passive movements in the ankle joint, and the EMG activity of two antagonist muscles. Both 8-OH-DPAT (0.125–0.5 mg/kg i.p.) and EMD 128130 (1–10 mg/kg i.p.) dose-dependently decreased the haloperidol-enhanced MMG to passive movements, as well as the tonic and the long-latency reflex EMG activities.

Provided these results can be extrapolated to humans, the efficacy of EMD 128130 in relieving the haloperidol-induced muscle rigidity supports the concept that novel antipsychotics with 5-HT_1A agonist and dopamine D₂ antagonist activities should have a favourable extrapyramidal side-effect profile.     

Imipramine-induced antinociception in the formalin test. Receptor mechanisms involved and effect of swim stress

This study concerned the effect of swim stress on imipramine-induced antinociception in mice. The data showed that intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of different doses of imipramine (10-40 mg/kg) and 0.5-3 min of swim stress (17 degrees C) induced antinociception in the first and second phases of the formalin test. Low period of swim stress (10 s) with low doses of imipramine (2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg i.p.), which did not have any effect by themselves, in combination showed antinociception in the second phase of the test. Either yohimbine (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) or naloxone (1 mg/kg i.p.) reversed the response induced by the combination of low doses of imipramine plus swim stress. Yohimbine (1 mg/kg i.p.) decreased the response of imipramine (20 mg/kg i.p.) but not that of 30 s swim stress in the second phase. However, naloxone (1 mg/kg i.p.) reduced the antinociception induced by imipramine (20 mg/kg i.p.) or 30 s swim stress in the second phase of the test, the combination of imipramine with swim stress was not altered by yohimbine or naloxone. Prazosin induced antinociception by itself in the first phase of the test and increased swim-stress-induced antinociception with no interaction. It is concluded that antinociception induced by imipramine in the second phase of formalin test may be mediated through alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonists. The results indicate that the responses of swim stress and imipramine may be mediated by an opioid mechanism, but the combination of both drugs induced higher antinociceptive effects.     

Analysis of the antinociceptive effect of the proanthocyanidin-rich fraction obtained from Croton celtidifolius barks: evidence for a role of the dopaminergic system

In a previous study, we demonstrated the antinociceptive effect of 63SF, a proanthocyanidin-rich fraction obtained from Croton celtidifolius barks, in chemical and thermal behavioural models of pain in mice. The current study now investigate the possible mechanisms underlying the antinociceptive activity of 63SF in the formalin test, by using drugs which interfere with systems that are implicated in descending control of nociception. The antinociceptive effect of 63SF (11 mg/kg, i.p., given 30 min prior to 2.5% formalin) was not altered by pre-treatment of animals 45-50 min beforehand with either prazosin (alpha(1)-adrenergic antagonist; 0.15 mg/kg, i.p.), yohimbine (alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist; 0.15 mg/kg, i.p.), ketanserin (5-HT(2A)-receptor antagonist; 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.), or l-arginine (substrate for NO synthase, 600 mg/kg, i.p.). On the other hand, treatment with sulpiride, an antagonist of dopaminergic D(2)-receptors (1.0 mg/kg, i.p., 45 min of pre-treatment), reversed the antinociceptive activity of 63SF. Pre-treatment of animals with reserpine (5 mg/kg, i.p., 24 h beforehand) did not alter the antinociceptive effect of 63SF. The current results support the view that the 63SF exerts antinociceptive effects by enhancing the activity of descending control, possibly by direct stimulation of dopaminergic D(2) receptors.     

Possible antinociceptive mechanisms of opioid receptor antagonists in the mouse formalin test

It has been reported that opioid receptor antagonist can induce antinociception in several nociceptive tests. In the intraplantar formalin pain model, however, opioid antagonist-induced antinociception, as well as its underlying mechanism, has not been well characterized. Therefore, in the mouse formalin test, we attempted to characterize the site of action and the possible opioid receptor subtypes. We found that naltrexone (a nonselective opioid antagonist) injected intraperitoneally (i.p., 1-20 mg/kg), intrathecally (i.t., 0.1-10 microg) and intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v., 0.1-10 microg) phase. Administration of beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA, 10-40 mg/kg i.p., 1.25-5 microg it or i.c.v.), naltrindole (1-10 mg/kg i.p., 1.25-5 microg it or i.c.v.) and nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI, 1-10 mg/kg i.p., 10-40 microg it or i.c.v.), which are selective mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid antagonists, respectively, also produced antinociception during the second phase. Additionally, we examined the involvement of the descending monoaminergic systems in the naltrexone-induced antinociception in the formalin test. Pretreatment with 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT, a serotonergic neurotoxin, 20 microg i.t.), but not N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine (DSP-4, a noradrenergic neurotoxin, 20 microg i.t.), reversed the naltrexone-induced antinociception during the second phase. Our results suggest that blockade of supraspinally or spinally located opioid receptors may play roles in the regulation of antinociception during the tonic painful stage. In addition, opioid receptors localized at the neuroterminal of the descending serotonergic, but not noradrenergic, inhibitory system in the spinal cord appear to be involved in opioid antagonist-induced antinociception during the second tonic phase of the formalin test.     

Yohimbine produces antinociception in the formalin test in rats: involvement of serotonin1A receptors

Rationale: Previous studies have suggested that the α₂-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine produced antinociceptive effects in the formalin test in rats. However, yohimbine is also an agonist at serotonin (5-HT)_1A receptors, suggesting the possibility that the antinociceptive effects of yohimbine might be mediated via these receptors. Objective: The purpose of the present studies was to evaluate the potential role of 5-HT_1A receptors in mediating the antinociceptive effects of yohimbine. Methods: The antinociceptive effects of yohimbine were evaluated using the formalin test in rats. Results: Yohimbine (2.5–10 mg/kg s.c.) produced dose-related antinociception during both phase I and phase II of the formalin test, and was approximately equipotent and equiefficacious to morphine. The selective 5-HT_1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 (0.03–3.0 mg/kg s.c.) produced a partial reversal of yohimbine. In comparison, the selective 5-HT_1A receptor agonist (±)8-hydroxy- dipropylaminotetralin HBr (8OH-DPAT; 1.0 mg/kg s.c.) also produced a dose-related antinociception in the formalin test, although 8OH-DPAT was completely reversed by WAY 100,635 (3.0 mg/kg s.c.). The antinociceptive effects of yohimbine were not antagonized by the 5-HT_1B/1D antagonist GR 127935 (1.0 mg/kg and 3.0 mg/kg s.c.), the 5-HT₂ antagonist LY53857 (1.0 mg/kg s.c.), or the 5-HT₃ antagonist zatosetron (3.0 mg/kg s.c.). Conclusions: The present results demonstrate that yohimbine produces a dose-related antinociception in the formalin test in rats which is mediated in part by the agonistic actions at 5-HT_1A receptors. Received: 10 September 1999 / Final version: 5 November 1999     

Involvement of Cholinergic and Opioid Receptor Mechanisms in Nicotine-Induced Antinociception

Abstract: In this work we have studied the influences of nicotinic agents on the antinociception of morphine in formalin test. Nicotine (0.001-0.1 mg/kg) induced antinociception in mice in a dose-dependent manner in the early phase of formalin test, and also potentiated the morphine effect. The nicotinic receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (0.5 mg/kg), but not hexamethonium decreased the antinociception induced by nicotine (0.1 mg/kg) in both phases. The muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine (5 and 10 mg/kg) also decreased the response of nicotine. Mecamylamine, hexamethonium or atropine did not alter morphine antinociceptive response, while naloxone decreased responses induced by nicotine or morphine. The antagonists by themselves did not elicit any response in formalin test, however, high doses of mecamylamine tend to increase pain response. It is concluded that central cholinergic and opioid receptor mechanisms may be involved in nicotine-induced antinociception.