Onset of induced atrial flutter in the canine pericarditis model

To test the hypothesis that induced atrial flutter evolves from a transitional rhythm, the onset of 99 episodes of induced atrial flutter (mean cycle length 135 +/- 18 ms) lasting greater than 5 min in 40 dogs with sterile pericarditis was first characterized. In 85 (86%) of the 99 episodes, atrial flutter was preceded by a brief period (mean 1.4 +/- 0.9 s, range 0.4 to 42) of atrial fibrillation. Then, in 11 open chest studies, atrial electrograms were recorded simultaneously from 95 pairs of right atrial electrodes during the onset of 18 episodes of induced atrial flutter (mean cycle length 136 +/- 16 ms). Atrial flutter was induced by a train of eight paced atrial beats, followed by one or two premature atrial beats (7 episodes) or rapid atrial pacing (11 episodes). A short period of atrial fibrillation (mean cycle length 110 +/- 7 ms) induced by atrial pacing activated the right atrium through wave fronts, which produced a localized area of slow conduction. Then unidirectional conduction block of the wave front occurred for one beat in all or a portion of the area of slow conduction. This permitted the unblocked wave front to turn around an area of functional block and return through the area of slow conduction that had developed the unidirectional conduction block, thereby initiating the reentrant circuit. The location of the unidirectional block relative to the direction of the circulating wave fronts determined whether the circus movement was clockwise or counterclockwise. The area of slow conduction and unidirectional conduction block occurred where the wave front crossed perpendicular to the orientation of the atrial muscle fibers, suggesting a role for anisotropic conduction. These areas included the high right atrial portion of the sulcus terminalis (10 episodes), the low right atrial portion of the sulcus terminalis (4 episodes) and the pectinate muscle region (4 episodes). It is concluded that the development of a localized area of slow conduction in the right atrium followed by unidirectional conduction block in this area produced during a short period of atrial fibrillation or rapid atrial pacing is necessary for atrial flutter to occur in this model.     

Effects of Azimilide Dihydrochloride on Circus Movement Atrial Flutter in the Canine Sterile Pericarditis Model

Azimilide and Atrial Flutter. Introduction: The effects of a Class III agent, azimilide di-hydrochloride, on atrial flutter circuits were studied in a functional model of single loop reentrant atrial flutter using dogs, 3 to 5 days after production of sterile pericarditis. Methods and Results: A computerized mapping system was used to construct activation maps from 138 to 222 epicardial sites in the right atrium. Doses of 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg IV azimilide dihydrochloride were analyzed in 8 dogs in which sustained atrial flutter lasting more than 30 minutes was induced by burst pacing. Atrial flutter was always due to a single loop circus movement reentry in the lower right atrium. At 3 mg/kg, azimilide dihydrochloride terminated atrial flutter in 2 dogs; however, atrial flutter was reinduced. At 10 mg/kg, atrial flutter was terminated in all 8 dogs but was reinduced in 4 dogs with slower rate. At 30 mg/kg, atrial flutter was terminated in the remaining 4 dogs and could not be reinduced. Atrial flutter cycle length always increased prior to termination. Isochronal activation maps showed that the increase in cycle length was due to additional conduction delays in the slow zone of the reentrant circuit. The site of termination was always located within the slow conduction zone situated in the lower right atrium between the line of functional conduction block and the AV ring. effective refractory periods (ERPs) were measured at selected sites in the slow zone and normal zone at twice diastolic threshold for the 10 mg/kg dose. Azimilide preferentially prolonged ERP in the slow zone (42.4 ± 20.l msec, mean ± SD) compared with (he normal zone (23.3 ± 15.4 msec, P < 0.0001). The increase in cycle length corresponded with the increase in ERP in the slow zone. Conclusions: In a functional model of circus movement atrial flutter, azimilide dihydrochloride terminates and prevents reinduction of atrial flutter by a preferential increase in refractoriness leading to further conduction delay and conduction block in the slow zone of the functional reentrant circuit.     

Efficacy of azimilide and dofetilide in the dog right atrial enlargement model of atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION: Azimilide dihydrochloride blocks both the rapid (I(Kr)) and slow (I(Ks)) components of the delayed rectified K+ current; dofetilide blocks only I(Kr). Their efficacies were assessed on atrial flutter reentrant circuits in dogs with surgically induced right atrial enlargement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multiple biopsies of the tricuspid valve and banding of the pulmonary artery in male mongrel dogs made them susceptible, about 3 weeks postoperatively, to stimulation-induced sustained (5 min or longer) atrial flutter. Azimilide 3 mg/kg administered intravenously (i.v.) terminated flutter in 8 of 8 dogs, but a slower, nonsustained arrhythmia could be reinduced in 5. In these 5 dogs, azimilide 10 mg/kg terminated flutter and prevented reinduction. This dose increased effective refractory period significantly more in the slow conduction zone (25%) than in the normal zone (17%) and increased flutter cycle length (37%). Termination followed progressive conduction delay in the slow zone of the reentrant circuit. Dofetilide 1 microg/kg i.v. terminated flutter in 6 of 6 dogs, but the arrhythmia could be reinduced. At 3 microg/kg, flutter terminated in all dogs and could not be reinduced. Dofetilide also increased the effective refractory period significantly more in the slow zone (17%) than in the normal zone (12%) and increased cycle length (33%), leading to interruption of the arrhythmia circuit. CONCLUSION: In the canine right atrial enlargement model of circus movement atrial flutter, both azimilide 10 mg/kg i.v. and dofetilide 3 microg/kg i.v. were 100% effective in terminating flutter and preventing reinduction. Efficacy relied on a similar mechanism of differentially prolonged refractoriness in the slow conduction component of the reentrant circuit where drug-induced termination occurred.     

Atrial activation sequence during atrial flutter in the canine pericarditis model and its effects on the polarity of the flutter wave in the electrocardiogram

Stable atrial flutter induced in both conscious and open chest states was studied in 30 mongrel dogs after production of sterile pericarditis. During the conscious state studies, induced atrial flutter (mean cycle length 128 +/- 15 ms) was always sustained greater than 15 min and was stable. Three types of flutter wave polarity were noted in electrocardiogram (ECG) lead II: positive in 16 dogs, negative in 3 and flat or slightly positive in 11. Sequential site atrial mapping during atrial flutter (mean cycle length 133 +/- 18 ms) in the open chest state showed either clockwise (18 dogs) or counterclockwise (12 dogs) circus movement in the right atrium. In 19 of 30 dogs, the circus movement clearly did not require any naturally existing anatomic obstacle; in 11, the orifice of the superior vena cava probably was also involved. Double potentials were recorded from the center of the reentrant circuit during atrial flutter, and fractionated electrograms were recorded from a pivot point of the reentrant wave front. A positive flutter wave in ECG lead II (12 dogs with counterclockwise circus movement) was associated with early activation of the Bachmann's bundle region compared with the posteroinferior left atrium and activation of the left atrium mainly in a superoinferior direction. A negative flutter was associated with the early activation of the posteroinferior left atrium compared with Bachmann's bundle and activation of a considerable portion of the left atrium in an inferosuperior direction. A flat or slightly positive flutter wave (14 of 18 with clockwise circus movement) was associated with activation of the left atrium almost simultaneously by two wave fronts coming from both these sites. In conclusion, atrial flutter in this dog model is due to circus movement in the right atrium, the center of which does not necessarily require an anatomic obstacle. Although atrial flutter is generated by circus movement in the right atrium, the flutter wave polarity in the ECG is determined primarily by the activation sequence of the left atrium.     

Multiplexing studies of effects of rapid atrial pacing on the area of slow conduction during atrial flutter in canine pericarditis model

BACKGROUND. We report that rapid atrial pacing interrupts atrial flutter when the orthodromic wave front from the pacing impulse is blocked in an area of slow conduction in the reentry circuit. To characterize the area of slow conduction during atrial flutter and rapid pacing, we studied 11 episodes of induced atrial flutter, mean cycle length 157 +/- 20 msec, in eight dogs with sterile pericarditis. METHODS AND RESULTS. Atrial electrograms were recorded simultaneously from 95 pairs of right atrial electrodes during the interruption of atrial flutter by rapid atrial pacing, mean cycle length 139 +/- 21 msec. Areas of slow conduction during atrial flutter were demonstrated at one to three sites in the reentry circuit. After rapid pacing captured the reentry circuit, one area of slow conduction either disappeared (10 episodes) or the degree of slow conduction in an area of slow conduction decreased (one episode). Both changes were in association with activation of the region by a wave front from the pacing impulse that arrived from a direction different than that during the induced atrial flutter. Interruption of atrial flutter during rapid pacing occurred when the orthodromic wave front from the pacing impulse blocked in an area of slow conduction that had either newly evolved during rapid pacing (seven episodes) or that was previously present (four episodes). CONCLUSIONS. Areas of slow conduction present during atrial flutter and rapid pacing of atrial flutter are functional and depend on both the atrial rate and the direction of the circulating wave fronts. Interruption of atrial flutter by rapid pacing results from block of the orthodromic wave front of the pacing impulse in an area of slow conduction in the reentry circuit.     

Circus movement atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model. Differential effects of procainamide on the components of the reentrant pathway

To evaluate the mechanisms of action of procainamide on the components of the reentrant pathway, drug-induced changes in activation patterns, effective refractory periods (ERPs), and stimulation thresholds were analyzed in nine dogs with sterile pericarditis and sustained atrial flutter. Activation maps were based on 127 close bipolar recordings from a special "jacket" electrode. From the control map, 22 +/- 2 sites covering the slow zone and the normal zone of the reentrant circuit were selected to measure ERPs and thresholds. The excitable gap was estimated from the longest ERP during pacing at the tachycardia cycle length. During atrial flutter, epicardial activation proceeded as a single wave around an arc of functional conduction block in the proximity of the atrioventricular (AV) ring or around a combined functional/anatomic obstacle, with the arc being contiguous with one of the venae cavae. An area of slow conduction, which accounted for 53 +/- 15% of the revolution time within 35 +/- 15% of the total length of the reentrant pathway, was bordered by the arc of block and the AV ring or a caval vein and the AV ring, respectively. Procainamide (5-10 mg/kg i.v.) prolonged the cycle length of atrial flutter from 144 +/- 17 to 190 +/- 24 msec (p less than 0.05) and then terminated the arrhythmia in all studies. The increase in cycle length was due to an increase in conduction time in the slow zone by 37 +/- 11 msec (86 +/- 17% of the total cycle length increase). During the last reentrant beat, conduction failed in the slow zone, with the arc of block joining the AV ring. At termination, procainamide had prolonged conduction time, stimulation threshold, and ERP in the normal zone by 11 +/- 18%, 40 +/- 80%, and 5 +/- 15%, respectively, compared with 51 +/- 16%, 86 +/- 93%, and 14 +/- 21%, respectively, in the slow zone (p less than 0.05 for all three parameters). The duration of the excitable gap did not change significantly. We conclude that procainamide preferentially affected the slow zone of single loop reentrant circuits. The drug terminated circus movement atrial flutter without abolishing the excitable gap, and its effect on conduction seemed the major determinant of the antiarrhythmic action.     

Circus movement atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model: Relation of characteristics of the surface electrocardiogram and conduction properties of the reentrant pathway

Objectives. This study was designed to elucidate the basis for the electrocardiographic (ECG) appearance of atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model.Background. During atrial flutter, the surface ECG may show typical F waves or isolated P waves of any polarity.Methods. Electrocardiographic leads II, III and aVF and epicardial atrial activation maps constructed from 127 simultaneously recorded bipolar electrograms were compared in 20 dogs with sterile pericarditis and inducible atrial flutter.Results. In 10 dogs with F wave atrial flutter, single loop reentry occurred around combined functional/anatomic obstacles that included one or both caval veins and a vertically oriented arc of functional conduction block. In 10 dogs with P wave atrial flutter, a merely functional (n = 4) or combined (n = 6) obstacle involving any atrial vessel and more vertically (n = 5) or more horizontally (n = 5) oriented arcs of block was present. The isoelectric interval between P waves corresponded to the conduction time within the slow zone of the reentrant circuit (96 ± 27 vs. 100 ± 24 ms, mean ± SD). Slow conduction accounted for 65 ± 8% of the cycle length in P wave atrial flutter, but for only 29 ± 7% in F wave atrial flutter (p < 0.05). Slow conduction was usually associated with activation of fewer than five epicardial electrodes per 10-ms isochronal interval, reflecting only a small amount of atrial tissue. The polarity of P or F waves was determined by the direction of the major wave front activating the most electrodes per 10-ms isochronal interval, irrespective of whether the right or the left atrium was activated.Conclusions. The F waves result from reentrant activation at a relatively constant speed around a vertically oriented functional/ anatomic obstacle involving one or both caval veins. The P waves occur when the circuit contains a marked area of slow conduction.     

Activation sequence during atrial flutter in dogs with surgically induced right atrial enlargement: I. Observations during sustained rhythms

The atrial activation sequences during 15 episodes of sustained atrial flutters were determined in the isolated hearts of four dogs with surgically induced right atrial enlargement (TI/PS dogs). These sequences were compared with the activation sequences of six episodes of nonsustained atrial tachyarrhythmias induced in three control hearts. Total endocardial activation of both atria during normal sinus rhythm and during the arrhythmias was determined first by recording simultaneously from 192 pairs of recording electrodes positioned into egg-shaped electrode arrays, and then by determining the moment of activation from each of the recorded electrograms. Isochronal maps of total activation were constructed by computer. Nonsustained atrial rhythms inducible in control hearts were due to circus movement excitation either in the left atrium (two episodes) or in the right atrium (four episodes). On the other hand, all 15 episodes of sustained atrial flutter induced and mapped in the TI/PS dog hearts were due to reentrant excitation in the enlarged right atrium. The reentrant pattern could be in a clockwise or counterclockwise pattern. In these episodes of stable flutter an area of functional block was an essential component to the reentrant excitation.     

Antiarrhythmic drugs preferentially produce conduction block at the area of slow conduction in the re-entrant circuit of canine atrial flutter: comparative study of disopyramide, flecainide, and E-4031

STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to test whether antiarrhythmic drugs preferentially suppressed conduction in the area of slow conduction in the re-entrant circuit. DESIGN--Intravenous disopyramide [n = 8, plasma concentrations: 1.4 (SEM 0.2) micrograms.ml-1], flecainide [n = 8, 0.6(0.1) micrograms.ml-1], and E-4031, a new class III antiarrhythmic drug [n = 8, 5.6(1.0) ng.ml-1], were investigated for their effects on atrial flutter due to re-entry in dogs with intercaval crush. In three dogs, detailed atrial activation sequence during atrial flutter was determined with a hand held bipolar electrode and an epicardial isochronal map was drawn. EXPERIMENTAL MATERIAL--24 anaesthetised adult mongrel dogs were used. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--There was an area of slow conduction during atrial flutter in the low right atrium. Atrial flutter was terminated in all dogs except for one treated with flecainide. In 92% of the dogs, conduction block occurred in the low right atrium in which the area of slow conduction was located. Increase in local conduction time was greater in the area of slow conduction than other parts of the atria (percent ratio to the increase in cycle length of atrial flutter: 63% with disopyramide, 52% with flecainide, and 99% with E-4031). CONCLUSION--These data suggested antiarrhythmic drugs preferentially suppressed conduction at the area of slow conduction in the re-entrant circuit leading to termination of atrial flutter in this canine model, irrespective of electrophysiological effects of antiarrhythmic drugs.     

Role of anisotropy in determining the selective action of antiarrhythmics in atrial flutter in the dog.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to clarify the electrophysiological and anatomical features of the preferential site of action of antiarrhythmic drugs in the re-entrant circuit of canine atrial flutter. METHODS: Electrophysiological and anatomical findings were correlated in 17 anaesthetised adult mongrel dogs with atrial flutter associated with an intercaval anatomical obstacle, before and after intravenous administration of disopyramide (2 mg.kg-1) and flecainide (2 mg.kg-1). RESULTS: Before drug injection, a rate dependent prolongation of conduction time occurred in the low right atrium where the conduction was slow during atrial flutter. Disopyramide (n = 8 dogs) and flecainide (n = 9 dogs) terminated atrial flutter, with conduction block occurring in this slow conduction area in the low right atrium. Although the degree of drug induced prolongation of refractoriness in this particular area was similar to those in other areas of the right atrium, conduction was depressed to a greater extent in this region. Anatomical study revealed that a thick pectinate muscle that branched from the crista or crista terminalis itself ran perpendicular to the wavefront of the pacing impulse and atrial flutter in this slow conduction area. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicated that slow conduction might be attributed, at least in part, to anisotropic conduction over the thick muscle bundle in the low right atrium, and that antiarrhythmic drugs preferentially produced conduction block in this area. Anisotropic conduction in the low right arium is an anatomical substrate for slow conduction in the re-entrant circuit and for the site preference of antiarrhythmic drugs in the present canine model.     

Electrophysiologic basis of catheter ablation in atrial flutter

A reentrant mechanism is believed to be responsible for atrial flutter. The recent development of the entrainment criteria further supports this theory, and there is a general consensus that circus movement is the underlying abnormality that supports this arrhythmia. In most clinical studies, abnormal fragmented (or double spike) electrograms, suggesting the presence of areas of localized slowing of conduction or block, have been reported. They are almost always recorded in the lower and posterior portion of the right interatrial septum, but also frequently in the high lateral portion of the right atrium. The determination of their involvement in the reentry pathway is important for designing curative procedures such as surgery or ablation. The low atrial septal area surrounding the mouth of the coronary sinus was suspected as being the critical area of slow conduction in atrial flutter. Rapid pacing at that site can yield a surface electrocardiographic pattern similar to the clinically occuring arrhythmias. Additionally, the flutter circuit can be accelerated during atrial pacing at fixed and slightly faster rates than the intrinsic tachycardia rate—the so-called entrainment phenomenon. When entrainment criteria are fulfilled, tachycardla termination being by definition ruled out, any concomitant recorded local type II block identifies an area that must be outside the circuit. Such local block may be recorded either spontaneously or during entrainment and therefore helps in identifying atrial slow conduction areas that do not belong to the reentrant path. This approach was applied to identify the optimal ablation site in 8 patients with long-standing drug resistant atrial flutter. In 7 of 8 patients, we were able to identify a fragmented potential in the low posteroseptal area during sustained atrial flutter. Fulguration shocks were delivered at this site without complications, and after a mean follow-up of SSA weeks atrial flutter was controlled in 5 of 8 patients without the need of His bundle atrioventricular node ablation.     

Role of anatomic architecture in sustained atrial reentry and double potentials.

To determine the role of anatomic architecture in atrial flutter, electrophysiologic findings were correlated with anatomic features in a modified model of atrial flutter with ligation of the crista terminalis. Crista ligation in the middle right atrium prolonged intraatrial conduction time in a rate-dependent manner in 12 dogs, particularly in the low right atrium. With burst atrial pacing, unidirectional block occurred either in the low right atrium or in the interatrial septal region near the superior vena cava, leading to initiation of atrial flutter. Atrial activation mapping revealed a slow conduction area in the low right atrium where conduction had been delayed by crista ligation. On the intact tissues between the venae cavae, double potentials were recorded, a finding indicative of functional block in the center of the reentrant circuit. The interdeflection time of double potentials changed with the activation sequence of atrial flutter. This change could be explained by assuming that the functional center of the reentrant circuit leaned on the right atrial free wall side. Anatomic study demonstrated that areas of slow conduction, unidirectional block, and functional block in the center of the reentrant circuit were closely related to the location of the intact crista terminalis. In conclusion, the intact portion of the crista terminalis played an important role in the genesis of atrial flutter after blockage of longitudinal conduction through the crista.     

Activation patterns in experimental canine atrial flutter produced by right atrial crush injury.

OBJECTIVES. This study was designed to localize and characterize the atrial flutter reentrant circuit and the electrophysiologic effects of right atrial crush injury in a new canine model. BACKGROUND. In previous studies sustained atrial flutter was induced in the canine heart by rapid atrial pacing after a linear crush injury was placed in the right atrial free wall. METHODS. Eight dogs (group 1) with three electrode plaques on the right and left atria and Bachmann's bundle and seven dogs (group 2) with a single high density electrode plaque on the right atrium were studied with use of a 64-channel computerized mapping system. RESULTS. At baseline, during sinus rhythm and right and left atrial pacing, activation spread uniformly without areas of slow conduction. Crush injury produced marked conduction delay or complete block during sinus rhythm, increasing the mean difference in activation times across the injury compared with control values (group 1, 31 +/- 4 vs. 14 +/- 5 ms, p less than 0.01; group 2, 28 +/- 10 vs. 7 +/- 2 ms, p less than 0.01). Rapid atrial pacing (S1S1 200 ms) above and below the crush injury revealed a line of complete block across which adjacent electrodes recorded markedly different activation times (33 +/- 5 and 38 +/- 12 ms difference, respectively) and around which activation wave fronts proceeded, colliding opposite the stimulating electrodes. The mean atrial flutter cycle length of 11 episodes induced in group 1 and 14 episodes in group 2 was 157 +/- 16 and 140 +/- 16 ms, respectively (p = NS). Activation mapping revealed a reentrant circuit in the right atrium around the crush injury in all episodes. Although the reentrant circuit did not contain a discrete area of slow conduction, activation time below was longer than that above the crush injury (92 +/- 14 vs. 66 +/- 8 ms and 82 +/- 12 vs. 59 +/- 9 ms in groups 1 and 2, respectively, p less than 0.01 for both). Rapid atrial pacing or premature stimuli produced progressive conduction delay and unidirectional block between the crush injury and the tricuspid anulus, inducing atrial flutter directly in 9 of 25 episodes. In 16 episodes, atrial flutter developed after transient induction of atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS. 1) Atrial flutter in this model is due to reentry in the right atrium; 2) the crush injury functions as an anatomic obstacle around which reentry may occur; and 3) the reentrant circuit does not contain a discrete area of slow conduction but, rather, generally slower conduction below the crush injury.     

Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on canine atrial flutter due to reentry: role of prolongation of refractory period and depression of conduction to excitable gap

Antiarrhythmic drugs prolong the effective refractory period and depress conduction. To determine the exact role played by these two electrophysiologic effects in the termination of reentry, the effects of disopyramide, flecainide, propafenone and E-4031, a new class III drug, were examined in a canine model of atrial flutter (cycle length 120 +/- 4 to 131 +/- 3 ms) caused by reentry. Atrial flutter was induced in 32 anesthetized open chest dogs after placement of an intercaval crush. The excitable gap ranged from 9 +/- 2% to 11 +/- 4% of the basic flutter cycle length. The effective refractory period in the reentrant circuit during atrial flutter was estimated by subtracting the excitable gap from the basic flutter cycle length. Prolongation of flutter cycle length by the test drugs was proportional to the interatrial conduction time (r = 0.87, p less than 0.001). Atrial flutter was terminated by each test drug in all dogs except for flecainide and propafenone in one dog each. E-4031 prolonged the refractory period during atrial flutter to 129 +/- 6 ms, which did not differ significantly from the flutter cycle length immediately before termination (134 +/- 4 ms). The refractory period during atrial flutter after injection of the other drugs was shorter than the flutter cycle length before termination of atrial flutter (for example, flecainide 126 +/- 5 vs. 179 +/- 11 ms, p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Circus movement atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model. Activation patterns during initiation, termination, and sustained reentry in vivo

The mechanisms of single-loop reentry in a syncytium without anatomically predetermined pathways have not been shown. Using a "jacket electrode" with 111 bipolar electrodes in a nylon matrix, we mapped in situ the atrial epicardial surface during atrial flutter in dogs with sterile pericarditis. Of 21 episodes of reentrant atrial flutter, only four showed double-loop ("figure-eight") reentry, whereas in 17 episodes a single loop was present. During initiation of single-loop reentry, an arc of functional block extended to the atrioventricular (AV) ring. This forced activation to proceed as a single wave around the free end of the arc, before breaking through the arc close to the AV ring. Activation continued as one loop around an arc close to the AV ring (in eight episodes) or around a combined functional and anatomic obstacle (in nine episodes) when the arc joined an atrial vessel. A zone of slow conduction was consistently bordered by the arc of block and the AV ring or by the anatomic obstacle and the AV ring. Spontaneous termination occurred when conduction failed in this area and the arc rejoined the AV ring. High-density recordings (2 mm) along the arc of block showed double potentials separated by an isoelectric interval, interpreted as local activation and electrotonus due to activation on the opposite side of the arc. Histologically, a diffuse inflammatory reaction involved 50-80% of the atrial wall. A transitional layer of myocardial bundles with preserved cross striation, but separated by edema and inflammatory cells, was enclosed between an epicardial layer of fragmented myocytes and an endocardial layer of grossly intact myocardium. There were no distinctive features at sites of functional conduction block or slowed conduction. In conclusion, single-loop reentry is the common pattern during atrial flutter in this model. Its induction depends on an interaction of the AV ring, a functional arc of block, and a zone of slow conduction. The location of the inferior vena cava predisposes the lower right atrium to this type of reentry.     

Mechanism of double potentials recorded during sustained atrial flutter in the canine right atrial crush-injury model.

BACKGROUND. During atrial flutter, double potentials may be recorded at specific sites in the atria. It has been suggested that double potentials represent sequential activations at the center of the reentrant circuit. An alternative hypothesis is that double potentials represent electrical activity in an area of slow conduction. Understanding their mechanism is important because double potentials have been considered a possible indicator of target sites for catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS. We systematically studied double potentials in our canine model of atrial flutter produced by right atrial crush injury using a 64-channel computerized mapping system with 56 electrodes on the right atrium in seven mongrel dogs under general anesthesia. Activation maps were recorded during sinus rhythm before and after crush injury, during rapid pacing above and below the crush injury, and during sustained atrial flutter, entrainment of atrial flutter, and termination of atrial flutter induced with D-sotalol (2 mg/kg). During sinus rhythm before crush injury, activation was uniform, and double potentials were not recorded in any dog. After crush injury, activation proceeded up to and around the crush injury, and narrowly split double potentials were recorded in two of seven dogs. During rapid pacing above and below the crush injury, double potentials were recorded in five dogs. During 14 episodes of atrial flutter (mean cycle length, 140 +/- 16 msec), double potentials were recorded at electrodes along the crush injury. The activation time of the early x component of the double potentials (25 +/- 13 msec) was similar to that of adjacent electrodes above the crush injury (24 +/- 11 msec), and the activation time of the late y component (89 +/- 13 msec) was similar to that of adjacent electrodes below the crush injury (91 +/- 14 msec). The timing of the x and y components was dependent on the location of the recording electrode, with x and y widely spaced at the end of the crush injury near the area of earliest atrial activation during atrial flutter, more equally timed at the center of the crush injury, and more closely timed at the end of the crush injury opposite the area of earliest activation. During transient entrainment, double potentials were accelerated to the pacing rate, but their activation time relative to adjacent electrodes was maintained. During abrupt termination of atrial flutter, the early x component of the double potential was always recorded, but the late y component was not, because of conduction block below the posterior end of the crush injury. CONCLUSIONS. This study has shown in our canine model of atrial flutter that double potentials are recorded from the center of the reentrant circuit and that they represent sequential activations as the reentrant wave front passes on either side of the crush injury.     

Pharmacologic conversion and suppression of experimental canine atrial flutter: differing effects of d-sotalol, quinidine, and lidocaine and significance of changes in refractoriness and conduction

The electrophysiologic determinants of conversion and the prevention of atrial flutter are poorly defined. This issue was therefore investigated by evaluating the effects of the new class III antiarrhythmic drug d-sotalol and the class I antiarrhythmic drugs quinidine and lidocaine. Atrial flutter was reproducibly induced in the open-chest anesthetized dog with intercaval crush and rapid atrial pacing. In this preparation, intravenous d-sotalol restored sinus rhythm in 14 of 15 (93%) dogs, whereas quinidine converted nine of 15 (60%) and lidocaine two of 10 (20%). d-Sotalol prevented reinduction in eight (53%), whereas quinidine was effective in four (27%) and lidocaine in none (0%). In the atria, d-sotalol induced significant increases in effective refractory period (+32%; p less than .01), functional refractory period (+30%; p less than .01), conduction time at an atrial paced cycle length of 150 msec (+9%; p less than .05), and atrial flutter cycle length (+8%; p less than .01). Quinidine increased effective refractory period (+40%; p less than .01), functional refractory period (+27%; p less than .01), conduction time at sinus cycle length (+13%; p less than .01), conduction time at an atrial paced cycle length of 150 msec (+18%; p less than .01), and atrial flutter cycle length (+31%; p less than .01). Lidocaine decreased functional refractory period (-6%; p less than .05) while lengthening the atrial flutter cycle length (+13%; p less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent, NIP-142, on canine atrial fibrillation and flutter.

The effects of a new benzopyran derivative, NIP-142, on atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFL) and on electrophysiological variables were studied in the dog. NIP-142 (3mg/kg) was administered intravenously to pentobarbital-anesthetized beagles during vagally-induced AF and during AFL induced after placement of an intercaval crush. Isolated canine atrial tissues were studied using standard microelectrode technique. NIP-142 terminated AF in 5 of 6 dogs after an increase in fibrillation cycle length (CL) and prevented reinitiation of AF in all 6 dogs. NIP-142 terminated AFL in all 6 dogs without any appreciable change in flutter CL, and prevented reinitiation of AFL in all 6 dogs. NIP-142 prolonged atrial effective refractory periods (11+/-5%, 3+/-3%, 12+/-3%, and 10+/-5% from the baseline value at basic CLs of 150, 200, 300, and 350ms, respectively) without changes in intraatrial conduction time. The prolongation of the atrial effective refractory period was greater in the presence of vagal stimulation. NIP-142 decreased action potential phase-1 notch and increased phase-2 plateau height without making any changes in the action potential duration, although it did reverse carbachol-induced shortening of the action potential duration. In conclusion, NIP-142 is effective in treating AFL and vagally-induced AF by prolonging atrial refractoriness.     

Simultaneous occurrence of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION: Early reports suggested that some patients with "atrial fibrillation/flutter" might have atrial fibrillation in one atrium and atrial flutter in the other. However, more recent conceptions of atrial fibrillation/flutter postulate that the pattern is due to a relatively organized (type I) form of atrial fibrillation. We report the occurrence and ECG manifestations of simultaneous atrial fibrillation and flutter in patients undergoing attempted catheter ablation of atrial flutter. METHODS AND RESULTS: In patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial flutter, an attempt was made to entrain atrial flutter by pacing in the right atrium. The arrhythmias observed occurred following attempts at entrainment, or spontaneously in one case. Twelve transient episodes of simultaneous atrial fibrillation and flutter were observed in five patients. The atrial fibrillation was localized to all or a portion of one atrium, during which the other atrium maintained atrial flutter. In each case, the surface 12-lead ECG reflected the right atrial activation pattern. No patients had interatrial or intra-atrial conduction block during sinus rhythm, suggesting functional intra-atrial block as a mechanism for simultaneous atrial fibrillation/flutter. CONCLUSION: In certain patients, the occurrence of transient, simultaneous atrial fibrillation and flutter is possible. In contrast to prior studies in which it was suggested that left atrial or septal activation determines P wave morphology, the results of the present study show that P wave morphology is determined by right atrial activation. Functional interatrial block appears to be a likely mechanism for this phenomenon.     

Catheter ablation of atrial flutter and macroreentrant atrial tachycardia.

Catheter ablation has evolved from an experimental technique to first-line therapy for the treatment of atrial flutter. Atrial flutter is characterized by a macroreentrant atrial tachycardia circuit. Successful ablation of atrial flutter involves (1) mapping the atrial flutter to define the conduction zones within the re-entrant circuit to determine whether the atrial flutter is isthmus-dependent, non-isthmus-dependent, or atypical; (2) interrupting the atrial flutter macroreentrant circuit with an ablation catheter by creating either focal or linear lesions within a critical zone of slow conduction that extends to anatomical borders; and (3) terminating the tachycardia and demonstrating conduction block within the atrial flutter circuit after ablation. This update discusses the classification schemes of atrial flutter and macroreentrant atrial tachycardias, reviews the technique of radiofrequency catheter ablation, and highlights recent ablation approaches for atrial flutters and macroreentrant atrial tachycardias.