Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autografting: chemotherapy and G-CSF or GM-CSF.

The mobilization of haematopoietic progenitor cells is a multifactorial process, still poorly understood at the molecular level. Mobilized haematopoietic progenitors, as defined by the expression of CD34 cell surface molecule, comprise heterogeneous subpopulations of cells committed to different haematopoietic lineages. Haematopoietic progenitors may be mobilized by chemotherapy alone, haematopoietic growth factors alone, or by chemotherapy plus haematopoietic growth factors. The choice of a mobilization regimen that allows an optimal yield of progenitors with a minimum number of leukaphereses should incorporate, in most patients, a disease-specific chemotherapeutic agent(s) plus a haematopoietic growth factor, to be continued until completion of harvest.     

G-CSF动员后异基因骨髓联合外周血干细胞移植治疗血液病

目的 探讨粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员的异基因骨髓与外周血干细胞混合移植后造血重建、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)、复发及生存情况.方法 45例血液病患者进行了动员后的异基因骨髓联合外周血干细胞混合移植,人白细胞抗原(HLA)全合37例,1～3个位点不合8例.38例恶性病中32例采用清髓性预处理,6例为减低强度预处理;7例重型再生障碍性贫血(SAA)均采用环磷酰胺联合兔抗人胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)及甲泼尼龙预处理.采用环孢素联合霉酚酸酯预防移植物抗宿主病,HLA不全相合患者加用ATG.供者给予G-CSF连续5天皮下注射,注射后第5天采集外周血干细胞,第7天采取骨髓血.结果 45例患者均获得快速造血重建,中性粒细胞绝对计数≥0.5×109/L,血小板≥20×109/L的中位时间分别为移植后的12(8～18)天和16(10～28)天.10例发生了急性GVHD(22%),Ⅱ度以上1例.可评估的42例患者中16例出现了慢性GVHD,7例为广泛型(16%).复发9例,死亡11例,其余34例中位随访时间16月(10～46月),可评估的2年无病生存率为75%.结论 G-CSF动员后的异基因骨髓联合外周血干细胞移植治疗血液病可获快速造血重建,移植相关死亡率及重度急、慢性GVHD的发生率低,复发率不增高.     

Harvesting and enrichment of hematopoietic progenitor cells mobilized into the peripheral blood of normal donors by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or G-CSF: potential role in allogeneic marrow transplantation

To explore the use of stem/progenitor cells from peripheral blood (PB) for allogeneic transplantation, we have studied the mobilization of progenitor cells in normal donors by growth factors. Normal subjects were administered either granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) at 10 micrograms/kg/d, or G-CSF at 10 micrograms/kg/d, or a combination of G- and GM-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg/d each, administered subcutaneously for 4 days, followed by leukapheresis on day 5. Mononuclear cells expressing CD34 (CD34+ cells) were selectively enriched by affinity labeling using Dynal paramagnetic microspheres (Baxter Isolex; Baxter Healthcare Corp, Santa Ana, CA). The baseline CD34+ cells in peripheral blood before mobilization was 0.07% +/- 0.05% (1.6 +/- 0.7/microL; n = 18). On the fifth day after stimulation (24 hours after the fourth dose), the CD34+ cells were 0.99% +/- 0.40% (61 +/- 14/microL) for the 8 subjects treated with G-CSF, 0.25% +/- 0.25% (3 +/- 3/microL, both P < .01 v G-CSF) for the 5 subjects administered GM-CSF, and for the 5 subjects treated with G- and GM-CSF, 0.65% +/- 0.28% (41 +/- 18/microL, P < .5 v GM-CSF). Parallel to this increase in CD34+ cells, clonogenic assays showed a corresponding increase in CFU- GM and BFU-E. The total number of CD34+ cells collected from the G-CSF group during a 3-hour apheresis was 119 +/- 65 x 10(6) and was not significantly different from that collected from the group treated with G- and GM-CSF (101 +/- 35 x 10(6) cells), but both were greater than that from the group treated with GM-CSF (12.6 +/- 6.1 x 10(6); P < .01 for both comparisons). Analysis of the CD34+ subsets showed that a significantly higher percentage of cells with the CD34+/CD38- phenotype is found after mobilization with G- and GM-CSF. In the G-CSF group, immunomagnetic selection of CD34+ cells permitted the enrichment of the CD34+ cells in the apheresis product to 81% +/- 11%, with a 48% +/- 12% yield and to a purity of 77% +/- 21% with a 51% +/- 15% recovery in the G- and GM-CSF group. T cells were depleted from a mean of 4.5 +/- 2.0 x 10(9) to 4.3 +/- 5.2 x 10(6) after selection, representing 99.9% depletion. We conclude that it is feasible to collect sufficient numbers of PB progenitor cells from normal donors with one to two leukapheresis procedures for allogeneic transplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Late G-CSF after allogeneic bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a prospective controlled trial

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used to accelerate neutrophil recovery after allogeneic BMT or PBSC transplantation. The optimal time to start G-CSF treatment is not known. Forty-two patients undergoing allogeneic BMT or PBSC transplantation for hematological malignancies received G-CSF either on day 6 or on day 9 post transplant. The time to hematological recovery was monitored and the two groups were compared with respect to peritransplant morbidity and mortality. Recovery of the neutrophil counts to >0.1 x 10(9)/l, > 0.5 x 10(9)/l and >1.0 x 10(9)/l were not significantly different in either group. There was no difference in recovery of red blood cell and platelet counts and no difference between the two groups with respect to the number of febrile days or number of days on antibiotic treatment. Documented bacterial, viral or fungal infections did not occur more often when G-CSF treatment was started on day 9. Delaying treatment with G-CSF resulted in a significant reduction in the length of treatment from 13 to 10 days (23.1% reduction). Reducing the length of the treatment by 3 days lowered the costs by 395.40 Euro per patient. Delaying G-CSF treatment and starting on day 9 after BMT or PBSC transplantation is safe and results in a clear economic benefit.     

Hematopoietic growth factor after autologous peripheral blood transplantation: comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation results in rapid hematologic recovery when sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells/kg are infused. Recent studies suggest that filgrastim (G-CSF) administration following transplantation leads to more rapid neutrophil recovery and lower total transplant costs. This study compares the use of G-CSF (5 microg/kg/day) with sargramostim (GM-CSF) 500 microg/day from day 0 until neutrophil recovery (ANC >1500/mm3) in patients with breast cancer or myeloma who had PBSC mobilized with the combination of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and G-CSF. Twenty patients (13 breast cancer and seven myeloma) received GM-CSF and 26 patients (14 breast cancer and 12 myeloma) received G-CSF. The patients were comparable for age and stage of disease, and received stem cell grafts that were not significantly different (CD34+ x 10(6)/kg was 12.5 +/- 11.1 (mean +/- s.d.) for GM-CSF and 19.8 +/- 18.5 for G-CSF; P = 0.10). The use of red cells (2.8 vs 2.3 units), and platelet transfusions (2.5 vs 3.1) was similar for the two groups, as was the use of intravenous antibiotics (4.3 vs 4.6 days) and the number of days with temperature >38.3 degrees C (2.3 vs 1.8). Platelet recovery was also similar in both groups (platelets >50,000/mm3 reached after 11.8 vs 14.9 days). The recovery of neutrophils, however, was faster using G-CSF. ANC >500/mm3 and >1000/mm3 were reached in the GM-CSF group at 10.5 +/- 1.5 and 11.0 +/- 1.7 days, respectively, whereas with G-CSF only 8.8 +/- 1.2 and 8.9 +/- 2.2 days were required (P < 0.001). As a result, patients given G-CSF received fewer injections than the GM-CSF patients (10.9 vs 12.3). Resource utilization immediately attributable to the use of growth factors and the duration of pancytopenia, excluding hospitalization, were similar for the two groups. This study suggests that neutrophil recovery occurs more quickly following autologous PBSC transplant using G-CSF in comparison to GM-CSF, but the difference is not extensive enough to result in lower total cost.     

Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) from mobilized peripheral blood display enhanced migration and marrow homing compared to steady-state bone marrow HPC

OBJECTIVE: Faster engraftment of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) transplants compared to steady-state bone marrow (ssBM) is well documented and clinically relevant. A number of different factors likely contribute to this outcome. In the present study we explored whether independent of cell number there are intrinsic differences in the efficiency of progenitor cell homing to marrow between MPB and ssBM. METHODS: Mobilization was achieved by continuous infusion of G-CSF alone or in combination with other mobilizing agents. In vivo homing assays, in vitro migration assays, gene expression analysis, and flow cytometry were utilized to compare homing-related in vivo and in vitro properties of MPB and ssBM HPC. RESULTS: Marrow homing of murine MPB HPC, generated by different mobilizing schemes, was reproducibly significantly superior to that of ssBM, in lethally irradiated as well as in nonirradiated hosts. This phenotype was independent of MMP9, selectins, and beta2- and alpha4-integrins. Superior homing was also observed for human MPB HPC transplanted into NOD/SCIDbeta2microglobulin(-/-) recipients. Inhibition of HPC migration abrogated the homing advantage of MPB but did not affect homing of ssBM HPC, whereas enhancement of motility by CD26 inhibition improved marrow homing only of ssBM HPC. Enhanced SDF-1-dependent chemotaxis and low CD26 expression on MPB HPC were identified as potential contributing factors. Significant contributions of the putative alternative SDF-1 receptor, RDC1, were unlikely based on gene expression data. CONCLUSION: The data suggest increased motility as a converging endpoint of complex changes seen in MPB HPC which is likely responsible for their favorable homing.     

Successful transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by chemotherapy and a single dose of pegylated G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma

Following induction therapy and 4 g/m(2) cyclophosphamide, a single dose of 12 mg polyethyleneglycol-conjugated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim; n=12) or daily doses of unconjugated G-CSF (8.5 mug/kg/day) (n=12) were administered to myeloma patients. Pegfilgrastim was associated with an earlier leukocyte recovery (12 vs 14 days) and peripheral blood CD34+ cell peak (12 vs 15 days). The peripheral blood CD34+ cell peak was lower in the pegfilgrastim group (78 vs 111/mul). Following high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m(2)) and autografting, leukocyte and platelet reconstitution was similar in both groups and stable blood counts were observed 100 days post transplant. In summary, a single dose of pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy is capable of mobilizing a sufficient number of CD34+ cells for successful autografting with early engraftment and sustained hematological reconstitution in patients with myeloma. These data provide the basis for randomized studies evaluating the optimal dose and time of pegfilgrastim as well as long-term outcome in larger cohorts of patients.     

Myelodysplasia and acute leukemia following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) has been reported after autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ABMT/PBSCT) for various malignancies. We retrospectively reviewed all adult ABMT/PBSCT cases performed at the University of Chicago Medical Center from 1985 to 1997 in order to determine the incidence of therapy-related leukemia. Among 649 patients, seven (1.1%) developed therapy-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia (one patient) or t-MDS/t-AML (six patients). Of these seven, primary malignancies included one case of breast carcinoma, five cases of Hodgkin's disease (HD) and one case of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Disease-specific incidences for therapy-related leukemia occurring after ABMT/PBSCT were one in 354 (0.3%) for breast carcinoma, five in 79 (6.3%) for HD and one in 103 (1%) for NHL. The median latency periods for the development of therapy-related leukemia from the time of initial diagnosis and of ABMT/PBSCT were 5.5 and 1.5 years, respectively, for the combined HD and NHL group of patients and 4.4 and 2.8 years, respectively, for the one breast carcinoma patient. All seven patients had clonal cytogenetic abnormalities, and five had recurring abnormalities typical of myeloid disorders. Given the similar latency period observed in patients treated with conventional chemotherapy alone, our findings support the hypothesis that therapy-related leukemia after ABMT/PBSCT likely results from pre-transplant therapy. Early detection of therapy-related leukemia is therefore critical to exclude these patients from undergoing ABMT/PBSCT.     

Progenitor content of autologous grafts: mobilized bone marrow vs mobilized blood

The progenitor content of autologous peripheral blood progenitor and stem cell collections is a major determinant of prompt hematopoietic recovery following autologous stem cell transplantation. We analyzed unstimulated bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) apheresis products in comparison to those collected following G-CSF or GM-CSF stimulation. We quantitated their committed (CFU-GM) and primitive (long-term culture-initiating cells, LTC-IC) progenitors in relation to hematologic recovery in 63 patients undergoing autografting for lymphoid malignancies. G-CSF, but not GM-CSF, substantially enriched the committed progenitor content (2.5-3.6-fold) of both PB and BM grafts. G-CSF also enriched the LTC-IC content of BM and PB compared to control grafts. GM-CSF augmented (11.5-fold) the LTC-IC content of stimulated BM, but not GM-CSF-mobilized PB. Neutrophil recovery was substantially quicker in recipients of BM or PB mobilized with G-CSF or GM-CSF. In contrast, red cell and platelet recovery was accelerated in recipients of GM-CSF-stimulated BM (but not PB) and G-CSF-stimulated PB (but not BM). No direct correlation between progenitor dose and hematopoietic recovery for neutrophils, platelets or red cells was observed. Cytokine stimulation can augment the committed and more primitive multilineage progenitor content of BM and PB grafts, to a differing extent. The uncertain relationship with multilineage myeloid recovery emphasizes the limitations in using clonogenic progenitor analyses to assess the adequacy of an autologous graft prior to transplantation.     

Primed marrow for autologous and allogeneic transplantation: a review comparing primed marrow to mobilized blood and steady-state marrow

Mobilized peripheral blood collections, obtained following either chemotherapy (with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)) or G-CSF administration alone, are rapidly replacing traditional bone marrow harvests as the source of cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. According to the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant and the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registries, for the years 1998 through 2000, blood stem cell (BSC) transplants accounted for about 80% of autologous transplants in the pediatric age group and more than 90% of the autologous transplants among adults. In allogeneic transplantation, where the donor is a healthy family member or normal volunteer, G-CSF-mobilized BSC transplants are being used more and more frequently, accounting for about 20% of allogeneic transplants in the pediatric age range and more than 40% of allogeneic transplants among adults during the same time period. It is not, therefore, too great a stretch to imagine that BSC transplants will soon be, if not already, in the majority for allogeneic transplantation among adults. The principal reason why this is happening is the prevailing view that BSC engraft more rapidly than marrow stem cells (MSC). However, this view is based on comparisons between primed circulating blood cells (BSC) and unprimed resident marrow cells in the steady state (SS-MSC). If the reason why BSC engraft faster than SS-MSC were a consequence of G-CSF used for mobilization, then would priming of MSC by G-CSF (Prim-MSC) accelerate engraftment of marrow as well? We reviewed the literature of the last 10 years to see if there were enough data to answer this question.     

Proliferation and differentiation potential of CD133+ and CD34+ populations from the bone marrow and mobilized peripheral blood

CD34 is the most frequently used marker for the selection of cells for bone marrow (BM) transplantation. The use of CD133 as an alternative marker is an open research topic. The goal of this study was to evaluate the proliferation and differentiation potential for hematopoiesis (short and long term) of CD133+ and CD34+ populations from bone marrow and mobilized peripheral blood. Eight cell populations were compared: CD34+ and CD133+ cells from both the BM (CML Ph−, CML Ph+, and healthy volunteers) and mobilized peripheral blood cells. Multicolor flow cytometry and cultivation experiments were used to measure expression and differentiation of the individual populations. It was observed that the CD133+ BM population showed higher cell expansion. Another finding is that during a 6-day cultivation with 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate N-succinimidyl ester (CFSE), more cells remained in division D0 (non-dividing cells). There was a higher percentage of CD38− cells observed on the CD133+ BM population. It was also observed that the studied populations contained very similar but not the same pools of progenitors: erythroid, lymphoid, and myeloid. This was confirmed by CFU-GM and CFU-E experiments. The VEGFR antigen was used to monitor subpopulations of endothelial sinusoidal progenitors. The CD133+ BM population contained significantly more VEGFR+ cells. Our findings suggest that the CD133+ population from the BM shows better proliferation activity and a higher distribution of primitive progenitors than any other studied population.     

Allogeneic transplantation of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donors: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from matched siblings has lead to clinical results comparable to those of standard bone marrow transplantation (BMT). We report the outcome of 79 patients transplanted with PBSC from unrelated donors. DESIGN AND METHODS: In 61 cases PBSC were used for primary transplantation whereas 18 patients were treated for relapse or graft-failure. In 35 patients receiving primary transplants, T-cell depletion (TCD) using CD34 positive selection of PBSC with or without additional T-cell depletion had been performed to reduce the risk of graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). RESULTS: The rate of primary graft-failure was higher (20%) in the TCD group than in that receiving unmanipulated grafts (UM) (5%, p=0.007). Patients with standard risk (n=34) receiving first transplants had a significantly better overall (60.4% vs. 24%, p=0.02) and disease-free survival (57.2% vs. 22.3%, p=0.006) compared to a high risk group of patients (n=21). There were no differences in the speed of neutrophil and platelet engraftment between TCD and UM transplants. As expected, the cumulative risk for acute GvHD grade II.-IV was significantly higher in the patients who had received UM grafts (71.8% vs. 38.1%, p=0.005). Although a trend towards a better survival rate was observed after TCD transplantation (52.2%) compared to the UM group (38.1%), this difference was not statistically significant. The probability of relapse was significantly higher in patients after UM transplants (38.8% vs. 8. 4%). This apparent paradox is explained by the higher number of high-risk patients in this group (p=0.03). Multivariable analysis of disease-free survival revealed risk category (p=0.02) and use of ATG (p=0.03) to be of significant impact. All patients (n=6) with non-malignant diseases are alive with full donor chimerism. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: These data show that PBSC from unrelated donors can be transplanted either unmanipulated or CD34 selected. Prospective studies comparing BMT with PBSCT from unrelated donors are needed in defined disease categories.     

Stromal-derived factor 1 and matrix metalloproteinase 9 levels in bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and chemotherapy. Relationship with mobilizing capacity of haematopoietic progenitor cells

The roles of the chemokine stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) and the matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) in haematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) mobilization are still unclear, particularly when patients are mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus chemotherapy. We determined bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) plasma levels of SDF-1, together with CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR-4) expression on CD34+ cells, and interleukin 8 (IL-8) and MMP-9 in 55 patients mobilized for autologous PB transplantation compared with 10 normal BM and PB samples. Plasma samples were tested at steady state (SS-) and after mobilization by cyclophosphamide and G-CSF administration (M-). SDF-1, CXCR-4, IL-8 and MMP-9 levels were significantly lower in SS- and M-PB than in SS-BM. Differences in SDF-1 levels between SS-PB and SS-BM were also observed after mobilization. We showed for the first time a clear relationship between the levels of circulating HPC, both at steady state and after mobilization, and those of secreted MMP-9 but not of SDF-1 or IL-8. However, a negative correlation was observed between mobilizing capacity and CXCR-4 expression on CD34+ cells. These findings suggest that G-CSF-induced mobilization of HPC from BM involves MMP-9, without reversing the positive gradient of SDF-1 between BM and PB.     

Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy

Two hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors, granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), have been shown to accelerate leukocyte and neutrophil recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow (BM) support. Despite their use, a prolonged period of absolute leukopenia persists during which infections and other complications of transplantation occur. We collected large numbers of peripheral blood (PB) progenitors after CSF administration using either G-CSF or GM-CSF and tested their ability to affect hematopoietic reconstitution and resource utilization in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. Patients with breast cancer or melanoma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support were studied in sequential nonrandomized trials. After identical high-dose chemotherapy, patients received either BM alone, with no CSF; BM with either G-CSF or GM-CSF; or BM with G-CSF or GM-CSF and G-CSF or GM-CSF primed peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Hematopoietic reconstitution, as well as resource utilization, was monitored in these patients. The use of CSF- primed PBPC led to a highly significant reduction in the duration of leukopenia with a white blood cell (WBC) count under 100 and 200 cells/mL, and neutrophil count under 100 and 200 cells/mL with both GM- and G-CSF primed PB progenitor cells, compared with the use of the CSF with BM or with historical controls using BM alone. In addition, the use of CSF-primed PBPC resulted in a significant reduction in median number of antibiotics used, days in the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, and hospital resources used. Patients receiving G-CSF primed PBPC also experienced a reduction in the median number of days in the hospital, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, platelet transfusions, days on antibiotics, and discounted hospital charges. Phenotypic analysis of the CSF-primed PBPC indicated the presence of cells bearing antigens associated with both early and late hematopoietic progenitor cells. The use of CSF-primed PBPC can significantly improve hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. In addition, the use of G-CSF-primed PBPC was associated with a significant reduction in hospital resource utilization, and a reduction in hospital charges.     

Sequential cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with dose escalation of carboplatin with or without paclitaxel supported by G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells: a phase I/II study in advanced ovarian cancer

To assess high-dose carboplatin chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel with filgrastim mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support in a phase I/II study, a total of 21 patients with mostly chemonaive disease received four cycles of high-dose chemotherapy. Cycle 1 (cyclophosphamide, 6 g/m2) was followed by two cycles of carboplatin (1600 mg/m2 or 1800 mg/m2). Cycle 4 consisted of carboplatin (1600 mg/m2), etoposide (1600 mg/m2), and melphalan (140 mg/m2). Further chemotherapy intensification was achieved by adding paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) to all cycles with a fixed carboplatin dose (1600 mg/m2). Ototoxicity was dose-limiting for escalation of sequential cycles of carboplatin. Grade 2 and grade 3 ototoxicity, hearing loss not requiring a hearing aid, or hearing loss correctable with a hearing aid, was observed with carboplatin at 1800 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sequential carboplatin, therefore, was identified in this study as 1600 mg/m2. After cycles 1, 2, 3 and 4 the median duration of leukopenia (<1.0x10(9)/l) was 7, 4, 4 and 6 days. Severe grade 3 and 4 infections were seen in only 7% of cycles. Of the 21 patients evaluable for disease response, 57% had complete remissions and 43% experienced partial remissions resulting in an overall response rate of 100%. The median progression-free survival is 25 (15-36) months, the median overall survival 36.5 (15-38) months. Most patients were suboptimally debulked or had bulky residual disease at the start of chemotherapy. Sequential high-dose chemotherapy to a maximum dose of 1600 mg/m2 carboplatin is effective and feasible. A randomized, prospective trial comparing sequential high-dose chemotherapy with optimal standard chemotherapy is now warranted.     

Hematological recovery and peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization after induction chemotherapy and GM-CSF plus G-CSF in breast cancer

In order to determine the effect of GM-CSF plus G-CSF in combination in breast cancer patients receiving an effective induction regimen, we compared hematological recovery and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization according to colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support. Forty-three breast cancer patients were treated by TNCF (THP-doxorubicin, vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, D1 to D4) with CSF support: 11 patients received GM-CSF (D5 to D14); 16 patients G-CSF (D5 to D14) and 16 patients GM-CSF (D5-D14) plus G-CSF (D10-D14). Between two subsequent cycles, progenitor cells were assessed daily, from D13 to D17. The WBC count was similar for patients receiving G-CSF alone or GM-CSF plus G-CSF, but significantly greater than that of patients receiving GM-CSF alone (P<0.001). The GM-CSF plus G-CSF combination led to better PBPC mobilization, with significantly different kinetics (P<0.001) and optimal mean values of CFU-GM, CD34+ cells and cells in cycle, at D15 compared to those obtained with G-CSF or GM-CSF alone. The significantly greater PBPC mobilization obtained with a CSF combination by D15 could be of value for PBPC collection and therapeutic reinjection after high-dose chemotherapies.     

Quality of life in Thai patients after bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a comparison study with patients treated with conventional chemotherapy

This study of adult patients of Thai cultural background compared the quality of life (QOL) of patients undergoing bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (BMT/PBSCT) with that of patients treated with conventional chemotherapy (CT). The study population comprised 59 patients who were transplant recipients (29 allogeneic, 29 autograft, and one syngeneic BMT/PBSCT) and 24 patients treated with CT for various hematologic malignancies. The participants completed a 50-item structured QOL questionnaire sent by mail. No significant differences were found between the two patient groups regarding their psychological, social, and treatment-related well-being or their overall QOL; all scores were above 75% of the total. The mean score regarding the physical domain, however, was significantly lower in BMT/PBSCT patients. Areas of highest concern in both groups were sexuality and financial burden. Happiness, functional ability, financial burden, and the degree of familial acceptance were the most important predictors of the self-rated QOL in BMT/PBSCT patients. Seventy-five percent of BMT/PBSCT patients would be willing to undergo the procedure again under the same circumstances. These results indicated that the QOL of Thai patients undergoing BMT/PBSCT was in general satisfactory and comparable to patients treated with conventional CT.