Radiotherapy patterns of care study in lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: For the first time, a lung Patterns of Care Study was conducted to determine the national patterns of radiation (RT) practice in patients treated for nonmetastatic lung cancer in 1998 to 1999. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national survey of randomly selected RT institutions in the United States was conducted using two-stage cluster sampling, stratified by practice type. Patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer (Karnofsky performance score [KPS] > or = 60), who received RT as definitive or adjuvant therapy, were randomly selected. To determine national estimates, sample size was weighted by the relative number of institutions per strata and the number of patient records reviewed per the number of patients eligible. Accordingly, 42,335 patient records from 58 institutions were reviewed by trained research associates. The unweighted sample size (or number of patients) was 541. RESULTS: The histologies were small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in 14.5% of patients versus non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 85.5% of patients. The median age was 67 years (range, 29 to 92 years); 61% of patients were male, and 38% were current smokers. Bone scans and brain imaging were not obtained in 34% and 52% of clinical stage (CS) III NSCLC patients, respectively. Regarding treatment strategies, for SCLC and CS III NSCLC, chemotherapy plus RT was used significantly more than RT alone (P <.05); in CS I NSCLC, RT alone was the primary treatment (P <.05). Overall, 58% of patients received systemic therapy. On multivariate analysis, factors correlating with increased use of chemotherapy included younger age, histology (SCLC > NSCLC), increasing CS, increasing KPS, and lack of comorbidities. Only 3% of all patients were treated on prospective clinical trials. CONCLUSION: This study establishes the general patterns of care for lung carcinoma in RT facilities within the United States. As supported by clinical trials, patients with limited-stage SCLC and CS III NSCLC received chemotherapy plus RT more than they received RT alone. Further improvements in staging, smoking cessation, and increased accrual to clinical trials must be encouraged.     

Routine use of approximately 60 Gy once-daily thoracic irradiation for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To review the outcome of patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer receiving daily thoracic irradiation (RT) to approximately 60 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of patients treated with RT for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer between 1991 and 1999 at Duke University were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five patients were identified who had received continuous course once-daily 1.8-2 Gy fractions to approximately 60 Gy (range 58-66). All patients received chemotherapy (CHT); 32 received concurrent RT/CHT and 33 sequential CHT and then RT. Prophylactic cranial RT was administered to 17 patients. The time from diagnosis to local failure, tumor progression, and death was assessed using actuarial methods. The median follow-up for all patients was 16.7 months and for surviving patients was 29.6 months. The median age was 64 years (range 36-83), and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80 (range 50-100). RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial rate of local failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival was 40%, 25%, and 23%, respectively. One case of acute Grade 3 esophagitis developed. Ten late complications occurred: four pulmonary, two esophageal, two infectious, one leukemia, and one retinal toxicity with prophylactic cranial RT. Six were mild and resolved with treatment. CONCLUSION:CHT plus approximately 60 Gy of once-daily RT for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer was generally well tolerated. The survival rates were less than have been reported using 45 Gy in 1.5-Gy twice-daily fractions (2-year overall survival rate 47% compared with 30% in this study), but may be comparable because fewer than one-half our patients received concurrent CHT/RT and only 26% received prophylactic cranial RT. The relatively low rate of normal tissue morbidity in our patients supports the use of conventional once-daily fractionation to > or = 60 Gy. A randomized trial would be required to compare the outcomes after maximally tolerated dose twice-daily RT vs. maximally tolerated dose daily RT.     

Changes in patterns of care for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of the 99-01 patterns of care study-a nationwide survey in Japan

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to analyze the practice process of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and evaluate changes in patterns of care for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) in Japan. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Patterns of Care Study (PCS) conducted the second nationwide survey of care process for patients with LS-SCLC treated by using TRT between 1999 and 2001. RESULTS: The PCS collected data for 139 patients with LS-SCLC (man-woman ratio, 5:1; median age, 69 years; age > 70 years, 43%; Karnofsky Performance Status > 70, 73%; and Stage III, 88%). Median total dose was 50 Gy. Twice-daily TRT was used in 44% of patients. Median field size was 12 x 14 cm. The most commonly used photon energy was 10 MV (77%), whereas obsolete techniques using (60)Co or X-ray energy less than 6 MV comprised 12%. Three-dimensional conformal therapy was used with 12% of patients. Computed tomography simulation was performed in 40% of cases. Only 12 patients (8.6%) received prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). Concurrent chemotherapy and TRT (CCRT) was used for 94 patients (68%). Only 6 patients (4.4%) entered clinical trials. Compared with the previous PCS 95-97, significant increases in the use of CCRT (34-68%; p < 0.0001), twice-daily TRT (15-44%; p < 0.0001), and PCI (1.7-8.6%; p =0.0045) were observed, although the absolute number of patients receiving PCI was still extremely low. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based CCRT and twice-daily TRT has penetrated into clinical practice. However, PCI is not yet widely accepted in Japan.     

老年局限期小细胞肺癌应慎用同期放化疗

目的 探讨同期放化疗在老年局限期小细胞肺癌治疗中的价值。方法 回顾分析2006—2011年本院行根治性胸部放疗的 168例局限期小细胞肺癌患者临床资料,将年龄≥65岁者定义为老年组(53例),<65岁者定义为非老年组(115例),对比不同治疗模式在老年和非老年患者的疗效及不良反应差异。结果 随访率为95.2%(两组分别失访 4例)。全组中位OS为24.6个月,中位PFS期为15.4个月。老年患者同期放化疗和序贯放化疗的中位OS分别为15.9个月和24.6个月(P=0.013),3、4级血液学不良反应发生率分别为13.3%和2.6%(P=0.170);非老年患者同期放化疗和序贯放化疗的中位OS分别为39.6个月和24.5个月(P=0.018),不良反应发生率相近(P=0.250~0.757)。结论 老年局限期小细胞肺癌同期放化疗的实施要谨慎进行,序贯放化疗可能是一种替代选择。     

121例局限期食管小细胞癌治疗模式探讨

目的 探讨原发性局限期食管小细胞癌综合治疗模式及预后。方法 回顾分析2004—2012年间收治的局限期食管小细胞癌患者121例资料,其中手术组患者98例(单纯手术37例、手术+化疗40例、手术+放化疗21例),非手术组患者23例(放化疗18例、单纯化疗5例)。采用Kaplan-Meier法OS分析并Logrank检验和Cox模型多因素预后分析。结果 手术组1、3年OS率分别为88%、37%,非手术组分别为78%、43%(P=0.585)。手术组内不同治疗模式LC率相近(P=0.113),手术+化疗、手术+放化疗组OS率均优于单纯手术组(P=0.002、0.028)。手术+化疗组1、3年OS率分别为88%、44%,与放化疗组的83%、50%相近(P=0.969)。化疗≥4周期组1、3年OS率分别为89%、53%,高于<4周期组的85%、35%(P=0.036)。多因素分析显示只有化疗与否是影响因素(P=0.006)。结论 局限期食管小细胞癌单纯手术治疗预后差。在系统性化疗基础上的手术治疗比放疗并不能明显提高患者LC和预后。化疗是独立影响因素,推荐化疗周期数至少≥4周期。     

Limited-stage mantle-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is known to have a poor outcome, however, most patients present with advanced-stage disease. Little information is available on limited-stage MCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological information on all patients with limited-stage MCL seen at the British Columbia Cancer Agency since 1984. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients had low bulk (<10 cm) stage IA (12 patients) or IIA (14 patients) MCL. Initial therapy was involved-field radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy (CT), 17 patients; CT alone or observation, nine patients. Fifteen patients are alive at a median follow-up of 72 months (range 14-194). Progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 and 5 years was 65% and 46%, and overall survival (OS) 86% and 70%, respectively. Five patients surviving beyond 8 years. Only age and initial use of RT significantly affected PFS. Five-year PFS for patients <60 years of age was 83%, compared with 39% for those aged >/= 60 years, P = 0.04. Patients receiving RT with or without CT (n = 17), had a 5-year PFS of 68%, compared with 11% for those not receiving RT (n = 9, P = 0.002). Receiving RT eliminated the impact of age on PFS (with RT the 5-year PFS was 83% for those aged <60 years and 57% for those >/= 60 years, P = 0.17). Although OS for the whole group was 53% at 6 years, it was 71% for those initially treated with RT, but only 25% for those not given RT (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: In our experience, patients with limited-stage MCL had an improved PFS when treated with regimens including RT, with a trend towards improved OS. These results suggest a potentially important role for RT in limited-stage MCL.     

The outcome of combined-modality therapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly.

PURPOSE: The North Central Cancer Treatment Group performed a phase III trial to determine whether chemotherapy plus either bid radiation therapy (RT) or daily (qd) RT resulted in a better outcome for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No difference in survival was identified between the two arms. This secondary analysis was performed to examine the relationship between patient age and outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-six patients were randomized to receive etoposide plus cisplatin and either RT qd or split-course RT bid. This retrospective study compared the outcomes of patients aged >/=70 years ("elderly patients") with those of younger individuals. Of the 244 assessable patients, 63 (26%) were elderly, and 181 (74%) were younger individuals. RESULTS: The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 39% and 18%, respectively, in patients younger than 70 years, compared with 36% and 13%, respectively, in elderly patients (P =.4). Grade 4+ toxicity occurred in 62% of patients younger than 70 years compared with 81% of elderly patients (P =.007). Grade 4+ hematologic toxicity occurred in 56% of patients younger than 70 years, compared with 78% of elderly patients (P =.003). Grade 4+ pneumonitis occurred in 1% of those younger than 70 years, compared with 6% of elderly patients (P =.02). CONCLUSION: Toxicity, especially myelosuppression and pneumonitis, was more pronounced in the elderly patients receiving combined-modality therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Despite increased toxicity, elderly patients have survival rates equivalent to younger individuals. Therefore, fit, elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC should be encouraged to receive combined-modality therapy, preferably on clinical trials with cautious, judicious monitoring. Future studies should explore ways to decrease toxicity of therapy in elderly patients.     

Therapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma in clinical practice: A retrospective long-term follow-up analysis

Treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is perceived to be relatively straightforward. Consequently, patients are not usually referred to hemato-oncologically specialized centres and are treated locally instead. Comprehensive findings beyond prospective controlled trials are therefore lacking. Clinical data of 209 patients who had received a HL diagnosis were collected. A total of 7 patients received radiotherapy (RT) alone (3%), 75 (35%) were treated with a combination of chemotherapy (CT) and RT and 127 patients received CT alone [mainly doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD)]. Complete response (CR) following first-line treatment was achieved in 178 patients (85%) and in 195 (93%) after salvage treatment. Favorable disease (p=0.000359), limited-stage disease (p=0.0003), involvement of lymph nodes above the diaphragm (p=0.05) and absence of mediastinal bulky tumor involvement positively affected the CR rate following first-line treatment. Out of the 195 patients that achieved CR, 31 relapsed. Male gender (p=0.043) and age over 45 years (p=0.047) were significantly associated with an increased incidence of relapse. Age at diagnosis was the key factor affecting long-term outcome. The event-free survival (EFS) projected at 120 months was 80 and 57% for patients younger and older than 45 years, respectively (p=0.022). The overall survival (OS) projected at 120 months was 92 and 38% for patients younger and older than 45 years, respectively (p=0.00561). A second neoplasia was diagnosed in 8 patients. The development of a tumor in 4 cases (breast, lung and thyroid cancer) was likely RT-related. Only 1 patient not receiving RT developed acute myeloid leukemia. The EFS and OS of the 141 early-stage patients treated with CT + RT (n=62) or with CT alone (n=79) were not statistically different.     

Topoisomerase i targeting agents in small-cell lung cancer

The topoisomerase I inhibitors such as irinotecan and topotecan are active agents against small-cell lung cancer that are effective in treating not only chemotherapy-naïve tumors but also progressed-stage tumors after treatment with cisplatin-based regimens, because their mechanism of antitumor activity differs from that of the agents included in standard chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer. Etoposide plus cisplatin or etoposide plus cisplatin alternating with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine is considered the standard regimen for small-cell lung cancer. No new standard combination chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer has been developed over the past decade. Irinotecan with cisplatin is now established as a new standard chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer based on the results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial. Of course, confirmation through phase III studies will be extremely important. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group is intensively investigating other irinotecan-containing regimens and the incorporation of irinotecan into treatment of patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.     

Systematic review evaluating the timing of thoracic radiation therapy in combined modality therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We employed meta-analytic techniques to evaluate early (E) versus late (L) timing of thoracic radiation therapy (RT) in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). In addition, we assessed the impact of radiation fractionation and chemotherapeutic regimen on timing. METHODS: Randomized trials published after 1985 addressing timing of RT relative to chemotherapy in LS-SCLC were included. Trials were analyzed by risk ratio (RR), risk difference, and number-needed-to-treat methods. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) RRs for all studies were 1.17 at 2 years (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.35; P = .03) and 1.13 at 3 years (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.39; P = .2), indicating a significantly increased 2-year survival for ERT versus LRT patients and suggestive of a similar trend at 3 years. Subset analysis of studies using hyperfractionated RT revealed OS RR for ERT versus LRT of 1.44 (95% CI, 1.17 to 1.77; P = .001) and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.90; P = .04) at 2 and 3 years, respectively, indicating a survival benefit of ERT versus LRT. Studies using once-daily fractionation showed no difference in 2- and 3-year OS RRs for ERT compared with LRT. Studies using platinum-based chemotherapy had OS RRs of 1.30 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.53; P = .002) and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.70; P = .01) at 2 and 3 years, respectively, favoring ERT. Studies using nonplatinum-based chemotherapy regimens had nonsignificant differences in OS. CONCLUSION: A small but significant improvement in 2-year OS for ERT versus LRT in LS-SCLC was observed, similar to the benefit of adding RT to chemotherapy or prophylactic cranial irradiation. A greater difference was evident for hyperfractionated RT and platinum-based chemotherapy.     

Split-course versus continuous thoracic radiation therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: final report of a randomized phase III trial

The optimal integration of radiation and chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. This phase III trial was conducted to determine whether chemotherapy plus interdigitating split-course thoracic radiation therapy (RT) improved survival compared with standard-dose continuous thoracic RT. One hundred fourteen patients were randomized to receive 50 Gy thoracic RT delivered in 2.0-Gy fractions given continuously (5 weeks) concurrent with the first 2 cycles of chemotherapy (arm A) or 50 Gy delivered via an interdigitating split course in 2.5-Gy fractions (8 weeks) concurrent with the first 3 cycles of chemotherapy (arm B). During the split-course RT, once-daily radiation was delivered on days 8-17 of each of the first two 21-day cycles and days 8-11 of the third 21-day cycle. All patients received the following chemotherapy: cisplatin/etoposide on cycles 1, 2, and 5 and cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin on cycles 3, 4, and 6. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was recommended after a complete response to all therapy. One hundred ten eligible patients were randomized. Grade 3/4 esophagitis was reported in 9% of patients receiving continuous thoracic RT versus 4% of patients receiving split-course RT. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was common in both treatment arms. Complete/partial response was observed in 80% of patients on arm A versus 84% on arm B. Overall survival rates at 5 years were 18% and 17% for arms A and B, respectively. Interdigitating split-course thoracic RT delivered in 2.5-Gy fractions was tolerable in patients with limited-stage SCLC but did not provide a survival advantage.     

Clinical characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in elderly patients in Japan has been on the increase. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of aging on the clinicopathological findings and the survival of HCC patients. A total of 624 patients with HCC were examined in this study. The patients were classified according to their age at the time of diagnosis: one group comprised younger patients (<75 years; n=544) and the second comprised elderly patients [(≥75 years; n=80, (12%)]. Results showed that there were significantly more female patients (younger:elderly, 22:36; p=0.005), normal livers (younger:elderly, 0.3:6%; p=0.0002), non-viral HCC (younger:elderly, 11:31%; p<0.001) and solitary tumors (younger:elderly, 53:76%; p=0.0008) in the elderly group. Five out of seven (71%) non-B non-C (NBNC) HCC patients who developed HCC in the normal liver were elderly patients. Survival between the younger and elderly HCC groups was not significantly different (younger:elderly, 4.38:3.45 years; p=0.665). Additionally, elderly HCC patients had fewer tumors, more mild underlying liver damage, and more frequent NBNC HCC. Their prognosis was not necessarily poorer than that of the younger HCC patients. Additionally, it appears that elderly patients develop HCC even without fibrosis. Therefore, aging may be a factor affecting hepatocarcinogenesis.     

Radiotherapy Planning Complexity and Survival after Treatment of Advanced Stage Lung Cancer in the Elderly

PURPOSE: Complex radiotherapy (RT) planning is increasingly common in the treatment of lung cancer though it remains unclear if these treatments are associated with better outcomes. We evaluated the association between the complexity of RT planning simulation with survival among elderly Stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We included all patients aged >65 years with histologically confirmed Stage IIIB NSCLC diagnosed between 1992 and 2002 receiving chemotherapy and RT from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry linked to Medicare claims. Patients were divided into simple, intermediate, and complex RT planning groups using Medicare physician codes. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to compare overall and lung cancer-specific survival rates across groups. RESULTS: We identified 1,733 patients: 148 (8%), 1,138 (66%), and 447 (26%) were classified as having received simple, intermediate and complex RT planning, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Increasing complexity of RT planning was significantly associated with better overall survival (p=0.0002). Multivariate analyses showed that intermediate (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.91) and complex planning (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.86) were associated with better overall survival compared to simple RT planning. Similar results were observed for lung cancer-specific survival analyses. Toxicities were comparable across groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of more complex RT planning and simulation methods is associated with better survival in elderly patients with Stage IIIB NSCLC. Although these results should be further validated in prospective clinical trials, this data suggests that complex planning may improve the outcomes of these patients.     

The value of combined-modality therapy in elderly patients with stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the value of combined-modality therapy in elderly patients by comparing the differences in outcome between patients who received radiotherapy (RT) alone and patients who received RT plus chemotherapy for stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The North Central Cancer Treatment Group performed 2 recent Phase III trials for stage III NSCLC. The first trial, NCCTG 90-24-51, included 3 arms: once-daily RT (QDRT) alone, twice-daily RT (BIDRT) alone, and concurrent chemotherapy plus BIDRT. The second trial, NCCTG 94-24-52, included 2 arms and compared concurrent chemotherapy with either QDRT or BIDRT. The chemotherapy arms of both trials included etoposide and cisplatin administered concurrently with RT. Only the patients aged >/=65 years (elderly) who participated in those trials were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Of the 166 elderly patients who were included in this analysis, 37 patients received RT alone, and 129 patients received concurrent chemotherapy plus RT. The median and 5-year survival rates were 10.5 months and 5.4% for the RT alone group compared with 13.7 months and 14.7% for the RT plus chemotherapy group (log-rank P = .05). Patients who received RT plus chemotherapy experienced significantly greater severe toxicity (grade >/=3) compared with patients who received RT alone (89.9% vs 32.4%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients who participated in these trials appeared to gain a survival advantage from RT and chemotherapy compared with RT alone. As is the case with younger patients, this benefit came at the cost of additional toxicity.     

Long-term results of a phase III trial comparing once-daily radiotherapy with twice-daily radiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: This Phase III study was performed to determine whether twice-daily (b.i.d.) radiotherapy (RT) resulted in better survival than once-daily (q.d.) RT for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 310 patients with LD-SCLC initially received three cycles of etoposide and cisplatin. Subsequently, the 261 patients without significant progression were randomized to two cycles of etoposide and cisplatin plus either q.d. RT (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) or split-course b.i.d. RT (24 Gy in 16 fractions, a 2.5-week break, and 24 Gy in 16 fractions) to the chest. Patients then received a sixth cycle of etoposide and cisplatin followed by prophylactic cranial RT. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 4.6 to 11.9 years (median, 7.4 years). The median survival and 5-year survival rate from randomization was 20.6 months and 21% for patients who received q.d. RT compared with 20.6 months and 22% for those who received b.i.d. RT (p = 0.68), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the rates of progression (p = 0.68), intrathoracic failure (p = 0.45), in-field failure (p = 0.62), or distant failure (p = 0.82) between the two treatment arms. No statistically significant difference was found in the overall rate of Grade 3 or worse (p = 0.83) or Grade 4 or worse toxicity (p = 0.95). Grade 3 or worse esophagitis (p = 0.05) was more common in the b.i.d. arm. Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 4 (3%) of 130 patients who received b.i.d. RT compared with 0 (0%) of 131 who received q.d. RT (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Although this study did not demonstrate an advantage to split-course b.i.d. RT, the long-term survival was favorable, likely reflecting the positive influences of concurrent combined modality therapy and prophylactic cranial RT.     

Results of combined-modality therapy for limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma in the elderly

BACKGROUND: A Phase III trial was conducted by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group to determine whether chemotherapy (etoposide and cisplatin) plus either twice-daily radiotherapy (BIDRT) or once-daily radiotherapy (QDRT) resulted in a better outcome for patients with limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma (LD-SCLC). No difference in survival was identified between the two arms. The current analysis examined the relation between age and outcome for patients treated during this trial. METHODS: The current study included 263 patients with LD-SCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of < or = 2 who were randomized to receive QDRT or split-course BIDRT. The outcomes of the 209 (79%) younger patients (age < 70 years old) were compared with the 54 (21%) elderly patients (age > or = 70 years old). RESULTS: Elderly patients presented with significantly greater weight loss and poorer performance status. The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 48% and 22% for younger patients compared with 33% and 17% for older patients (P = 0.14). One specific toxicity (i.e., Grade > or = 4 pneumonitis [according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria]) occurred in 0% of those patients age < 70 years compared with 6% of older patients (P = 0.008). Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 1 of 209 (0.5%) patients age < 70 years compared with 3 of 54 (5.6%) older patients (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Despite having more weight loss, poorer performance status, increased pulmonary toxicity, and more deaths due to treatment, survival was not found to be significantly worse in older individuals. Fit elderly patients with LD-SCLC can receive combined-modality therapy with the expectation of relatively favorable long-term survival. Future research should focus on ways to decrease toxicity especially in the elderly.     

Retrospective study of efficacy and toxicity on patients older than 70 years within a randomized clinical trial of two cisplatin-based combinations in patients with small-cell lung cancer

A retrospective analysis based on the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) clinical trial of high-dose epirubicin/cisplatin in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was performed. Patients younger than 70 years vs. older than 70 years old were analyzed to evaluate the influence of age on response to treatment, toxicity, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of the chemotherapy schedule. Three hundred and thirty eight patients <70 years and sixty-four >70 years, were analyzed. Objective responses were similar in both groups. In patients less than 70 years higher TTP (36 weeks vs. 32 weeks) and OS (47 weeks vs. 42 weeks) were seen, attributable to the improved results observed in the subgroup of patients with limited disease (LD). No significant differences were observed when toxicity profile of both groups was compared, except for a higher rate of febrile neutropenia observed in the elderly group with extensive disease (4.6% vs. 8.8%, p=0.01). In the subgroup of patients with LD, elderly patients received less total cisplatin dose (401 vs. 508 mg/m(2), p=0.01) although less treatment delays were reported (10 days vs. 15 days, p=0.05). Age was likely to be a negative prognostic factor for OS of elderly patients with LD. It also seemed to be related to a greater dose reduction, which may explain that toxic episodes and delays occurred more frequently in the younger patients receiving the full scheduled dose. However, the definitive reason to explain this could not be established due to the characteristics of our analysis.     

Process and preliminary outcome of a patterns-of-care study of esophageal cancer in Japan: patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of radiotherapy (RT) in Japan, we have been carrying out a national survey through patterns-of-care studies (PCSs) since 1996. We present the preliminary results of surgery combined with RT with or without chemotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A Japanese PCS data format for esophageal cancer was established based on one used in the United States and including information used in the surgical registration system in Japan, so that the results in both countries could be compared. An independent panel of radiation oncologists surveyed randomly selected institutions and patients between September 1998 and March 2001. There were 767 esophageal cancer patients, of whom 220 had undergone preoperative or postoperative RT. RESULTS: The median age of the 220 patients was 62.3 years (range 31-89); of them, 88.1% were men. Pathologically, 218 patients (99.5%) had squamous cell carcinoma, predominantly located in the middle and lower thoracic esophagus, 41.7% of the patients had Stage III disease; they accounted for 52.6% of patients in nonacademic institutions and for 37.7% of those in academic institutions (p = 0.016). Sixty-nine patients received preoperative RT; of them, 60.9% received chemotherapy; 145 patients received postoperative RT with or without chemotherapy. The spinal cord of 23 (11.7%) of 196 patients was irradiated with >/=50 Gy. In academic institutions, extended radical "three-field" lymphatic dissection was performed for 72 (48.7%) of 148 patients; however, this sophisticated surgical procedure was done in only 13 (25.5%) of 51 patients in nonacademic settings (p = 0.004). In all large academic institutions (those treating >/=300 patients annually), >/=6 MV of photon energy was used; 30.5% of nonacademic institutes had linear accelerators of <6 MV photon (p = 0.001). No deviations occurred in the radiation dose (median 46 Gy), fractionations, or fields between the two types of institutions. Univariate analyses showed that the statistically significant prognostic factors affecting overall survival were stage (p = 0.001), extended radical "three-field" lymphatic dissection (p = 0.001), no residual tumor (p = 0.001), supraclavicular RT (p = 0.001), mediastinal RT (p = 0.025), Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.006) photon energy (p = 0.011), and stratification of the institutions (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the type of institution (p = 0.045, risk ratio = 0.604), stage (p 0.029, risk ratio = 0.572), no residual tumor (p = 0.006, risk ratio = 0.487), photon energy (p = 0.043, risk ratio = 0.579), and use of chemotherapy (p = 0.012, risk ratio = 1.907) significantly affected overall survival. CONCLUSION: This PCS showed that in Japan important issues are present regarding RT for esophageal cancer that should be solved immediately, namely, treatment strategy, photon energy, and dose applied to the spinal cord. The PCS provided important information on how much improvement in structure and process would be required nationwide for RT of esophageal cancer.     

Redevelopment of small-cell lung cancer nine years after the start of therapy. A case report and review of the literature.

Most patients with small-cell lung cancer usually relapse within 1 to 2 years. Relapses after a 5-year disease-free interval occur extremely rarely. This report describes a patient with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer who had achieved a complete response to combination chemotherapy followed by chest irradiation but developed small-cell lung cancer 9.4 years after the beginning of therapy. Small-cell lung cancer recurred in the same side of the lung, in the mediastinal nodes, and in the liver. The pattern of development of small-cell lung cancer suggests that the patient had a relapse rather than a metachronous lung cancer. To our knowledge, this is the second-latest relapse of small-cell lung cancer in the literature.     

Effect of Low-Dose Chest Irradiation Before Chemotherapy on the Rate of Local Failure in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: To evaluate the rate of tumor recurrence within the irradiated volume after initial low-dose irradiation of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), to assess the tolerance of a sequential combination of low-dose chest irradiation followed by chemotherapy, and to confirm the responsiveness of limited-stage SCLC to low-dose irradiation.Methods and Materials: In this pilot study, 26 patients with limited-stage SCLC were treated by first-line 20-Gy thoracic irradiation followed 3 weeks later by chemotherapy (cisplatin, doxorubicin, and etoposide for six cycles).Results: We present our final results with a median follow-up of surviving patients of 7 years. The response rate to this low-dose irradiation was 83%, with an overall response rate to radiochemotherapy of 96% and a median survival of 21 months. No unexpected early or late toxicity was observed. The rate of initial isolated local failure was 8%, which compares favorably with other published series using higher doses of radiochemotherapy.Conclusion: An initial chest irradiation of 20 Gy before chemotherapy could be sufficient to reduce the risk of local failure during the time of survival of patients with limited-stage SCLC. Potential advantages of this treatment may be the prevention of resistance mechanisms to radiotherapy induced by preliminary chemotherapy and a reduced radiation-induced toxicity.