Effectiveness of sub-Tenon's versus peribulbar anesthesia in extracapsular cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of sub-Tenon's versus peribulbar anesthesia in extracapsular cataract surgery. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology and the Maccabi Eye Institute, Tel Aviv, Israel. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive patients who had extracapsular cataract surgery were randomized to have sub-Tenon's or peribulbar anesthesia. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured before and 1 and 10 minutes after injection. The motility of the rectus muscles was evaluated before and 20 minutes after the injection, and the patient's anxiety level was recorded immediately after the injection. Pain was assessed intraoperatively and 1 and 24 hours postoperatively by patient self-grading. RESULTS: One minute after the injection, IOP increased significantly in the peribulbar group (mean 7.97 mm Hg +/- 8.80 [SD]) (P < .05). There was no significant increase in the sub-Tenon's injection group (mean 0.12 +/- 3.09 mm Hg). In both groups, IOP returned to preinjection levels by 10 minutes postoperatively. Patients with peribulbar anesthesia reported a significantly higher level of anxiety than those who had sub-Tenon's anesthesia (P < .05). Although the intraoperative pain levels were the same, the sub-Tenon's group reported significantly higher levels of pain 1 and 24 hours postoperatively; 16% in the sub-Tenon's group and none in the peribulbar group reported moderate pain 24 hours after anesthesia. Ocular motility was the same except for the inferior rectus muscle, which was less motile on average in the peribulbar group. CONCLUSION: Sub-Tenon's anesthesia led to less IOP elevation than peribulbar anesthesia and provided similarly good globe immobilization and approximately the same pain levels intraoperatively.     

Patient comfort during clear corneal phacoemulsification with sub-Tenon's local anesthesia

PURPOSE: To assess patient comfort with and without intravenous (i.v.) cannulation during 1-quadrant sub-Tenon's anesthesia during phacoemulsification. SETTING: Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, Scotland, United Kingdom. METHODS: This prospective masked controlled clinical trial comprised 119 patients having elective clear corneal phacoemulsification. Fifty had sub-Tenon's anesthesia with an i.v. cannula; 23, sub-Tenon's anesthesia without an i.v. cannula; and 46, topical anesthesia of proparacaine 0.5% without an i.v. cannula. No patient received sedation. All patients had clear corneal phacoemulsification with foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. The patients' subjective pain experience was measured immediately after surgery by a single independent observer using a 10-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: The mean patient-reported pain was low in all 3 groups. The mean i.v. cannula-related pain score in the sub-Tenon's group with an i.v. cannula (1.00; range 0 to 8) was higher than the mean general pain score (0.46; range 0 to 5) and worst pain experienced during surgery score (0.64; range 0 to 3). In the topical anesthesia group, 8 patients (17%) reported greater discomfort directly or indirectly related to the subconjunctival antibiotic injection at the end of surgery. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported pain caused by placing an i.v. cannula in the sub-Tenon's group significantly altered overall patient comfort during the surgical experience. Thus, the routine use of i.v. access during clear corneal phacoemulsification under sub-Tenon's anesthesia should be avoided to improve patient satisfaction.     

Pain induced by phacoemulsification performed by residents using topical anesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-reported pain induced by phacoemulsification performed by residents using topical anesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study comprised 81 eyes of 76 consecutive patients having phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia. Surgery was performed by an experienced surgeon (group 1; n=41 eyes) or by two residents (group 2; n=40 eyes). No sedation or intracameral anesthesia was used in either group. Eighty eyes had clear corneal phacoemulsification with foldable acrylic posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Patients were asked postoperatively to grade the pain they experienced during the procedure using a visual analog pain scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS: The median pain score for the overall pain was 1.59 +/- 1.43 (range: 0 to 6) in group 1 and 1.95 +/- 1.64 (range: 0 to 7) in group 2 (P = .291). The mean pain score for the maximum pain perceived was 2.39 +/- 1.86 (range: 0 to 7) in group 1 and 2.53 +/- 1.67 (range: 0 to 7) in group 2 (P = .734). There was no significant correlation between the duration of surgery and the overall pain score (r = 0.102, P = .365). CONCLUSION: Topical anesthesia had sufficient analgesic effects in selected patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery by resident surgeons. The pain felt during the operation was low and tolerable.     

Cataract surgery under topical anesthesia in patients with coexisting glaucoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare levels of patient discomfort and complications during phacoemulsification with implantation of a foldable intraocular lens (IOL) under topical lidocaine hydrochloride in patients with and without various forms of chronic open-angle and chronic angle-closure glaucoma. SETTING: Two university eye centers in Germany. METHODS: This prospective nonrandomized comparative study comprised 176 eyes of 176 patients with various forms of chronic open-angle glaucoma and chronic angle-closure glaucoma. Eyes with cataract and without a glaucoma diagnosis or history of intraocular surgery served as a control group (n = 212). All patients received a minimum of 5 doses (2 drops per dose) of topical lidocaine hydrochloride 2% before standard temporal clear corneal phacoemulsification and foldable IOL implantation. No intracameral anesthetic injection was given, and no systemic sedatives were used. The main outcome measures were the number of complications and adverse events. RESULTS: The intraoperative complication rate in all patients (n = 388) was capsule tear, 1.3%; zonule tear, 1.8%; vitreous loss, 1.0%; iris prolapse, 0.8%. No statistically significant differences in intraoperative or early postoperative complications were found between the glaucoma and control groups. The mean pain scores of patients were 0.38 +/- 1.1 (SD) in the glaucoma group and 0.36 +/- 0.8 in the control group (P =.21) Patient preference for cataract surgery under topical anesthesia was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery-related complications and patient discomfort were similar in patients with and without glaucoma who had phacoemulsification and IOL implantation under topical anesthesia. These results indicate that topical anesthesia is safe for routine phacoemulsification with foldable IOL implantation in patients with glaucoma and does not compromise patient comfort.     

Topical plus intracameral lidocaine versus retrobulbar anesthesia in phacotrabeculectomy: prospective randomized study

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical and retrobulbar anesthesia for phacotrabeculectomy. SETTING: Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 60 patients (60 eyes) having phacotrabeculectomy surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups receiving topical anesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine 1% or retrobulbar anesthesia. Patients were asked to document the discomfort they experienced during the administration of the anesthetic agent, during surgery, and postoperatively using a numeric pain scale. Complications and surgical conditions were also evaluated. RESULTS: The retrobulbar group reported significantly more discomfort during administration of the anesthetic agent than the topical group (P < .001). The topical group reported significantly more discomfort intraoperatively (P < .01). Eyelid squeezing and eyeball movement were more common in the topical group; however, neither was a problem to the surgeon. There was no difference in surgical conditions (P = .38) or the postoperative pain scores between the 2 groups (P = .06). One patient receiving topical anesthesia developed a suprachoroidal hemorrhage intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Topical anesthesia supplemented with intracameral lidocaine was an effective alternative to retrobulbar anesthesia for phacotrabeculectomy. Although the degree of patient discomfort was significantly higher during surgery under topical anesthesia, the method avoids the pain and complications associated with a retrobulbar injection.     

Phacoemulsification with transpupillary silicone oil removal and lens implantation through a corneal incision using topical anesthesia

PURPOSE: To evaluate phacoemulsification combined with transpupillary silicone oil removal and foldable intraocular lens (IOL) implantation through a single corneal incision and planned posterior capsulorhexis after pars plana vitrectomy using topical anesthesia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy. METHODS: This noncomparative nonrandomized noncontrolled interventional case series comprised 34 consecutive patients (34 eyes). The mean age of the 25 men and 9 women was 54.4 years +/- 13.3 (SD). A mean of 8.2 +/- 9.4 months after silicone oil injection, patients had phacoemulsification with transpupillary silicone oil removal and foldable acrylic IOL implantation through a single corneal incision and a planned posterior capsulorhexis under topical anesthesia. Patients were operated on by the same surgeon. Visual acuity, the frequency of retinal redetachment, secondary cataract and vitreous hemorrhage formation, subjective pain and discomfort, the duration of surgery, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were noted. The mean follow-up was 9.4 +/- 5.1 months (range 4 to 21 months). RESULTS: Vision improved or stabilized in 88.2% of eyes. Retinal redetachment occurred in 4 eyes (11.8%) and transient vitreous hemorrhage in 1 (2.9%). All patients reported minimal discomfort during the procedure. The mean duration of surgery was 17 +/- 4 minutes. There was no significant intraoperative or postoperative IOP variation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined phacoemulsification, transpupillary silicone oil removal, and IOL implantation through a single corneal incision under topical anesthesia was safe and effective. In general, the visual outcomes were good with improvement in visual acuity.     

Comparative clinical trial of topical anesthetic agents in cataract surgery: lidocaine 2% gel, bupivacaine 0.5% drops, and benoxinate 0.4% drops

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of lidocaine gel, bupivacaine drops, and benoxinate drops as topical anesthetic agents in cataract surgery. SETTING: Kasr El-Aini Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. METHODS: This prospective randomized study comprised 90 patients scheduled for routine cataract extraction. Patients were randomized into 3 groups of 30 each based on which anesthetic agent they received: lidocaine 2% gel, bupivacaine 0.5% drops, or benoxinate 0.4% drops. Subjective pain at application of the agent and intraoperatively was quantified by the patients using a verbal pain score (VPS) scale from 0 to 10. The duration of discomfort at application, duration of surgery, rate of supplemental sub-Tenon's anesthesia, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: The mean VPS at application was 2.97, 1.53, and 1.03 in the lidocaine, bupivacaine, and benoxinate groups, respectively; the VPS in the lidocaine group was statistically significantly higher than in the other 2 groups (P<.001). The mean duration of pain at application was 25 seconds, 14 seconds, and 6 seconds in the lidocaine, bupivacaine, and benoxinate groups, respectively, and was statistically significantly higher in the lidocaine group (P<.001). The mean VPS during surgery was 1.6, 4.1, and 7.1 in the lidocaine, bupivacaine, and benoxinate groups; the lidocaine group had a statistically significantly lower mean VPS than the other 2 groups (P<.001). The incidence of supplemental sub-Tenon's injection was 3.3%, 10.0%, and 73.3%, respectively, and was statistically significantly lower in the lidocaine and bupivacaine groups than in the benoxinate group (P<.001). The patients' overall satisfaction was statistically significantly higher in the lidocaine and bupivacaine groups than in the benoxinate group (93.3%, 83.3%, and 33.3%, respectively) (P<.001). Three patients in the lidocaine group had corneal haze at the time of surgery, which was not statistically significant (P>.1). CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine gel was a better topical anesthetic agent than bupivacaine and benoxinate drops. Bupivacaine drops were effective in providing deep topical anesthesia.     

No-anesthesia clear corneal phacoemulsification versus topical and topical plus intracameral anesthesia. Randomized clinical trial.

Purpose: To compare the intraoperative pain scores during clear corneal phacoemulsification under no anesthesia, topical anesthesia, and topical plus intracameral anesthesia.Setting: Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Center, Chennai, India.Methods: Seventy-five patients were randomized to have phacoemulsification under no anesthesia, topical anesthesia, or topical plus intracameral anesthesia. Uncooperative or illiterate patients and those with hard cataract, a shallow anterior chamber, or small pupils were excluded. A protocol was established for supplemental anesthesia in case of breakthrough pain during the surgery. Each patient was asked to grade the overall severity of intraoperative pain immediately after surgery on a 10-point visual analog scale. Also evaluated were the general discomfort during surgery, discomfort from the microscope lights, surgeon stress during surgery, and total surgical time. Comparison among the 3 groups was performed using an analysis of variance.Results: No supplemental anesthesia was required in any group. No significant difference was noted in the mean scores of the subjective sensation of pain with or without topical anesthesia (P =.610). The mean scores of patient discomfort from the microscope lights and surgical time were also statistically insignificant. Patient discomfort and surgeon stress during surgery were significantly greater in the no-anesthesia group than in the topical and topical plus intracameral groups (P =.0235 and P = 0.0206, respectively).Conclusion: No-anesthesia clear corneal phacoemulsification was performed by a highly experienced, skilled surgeon without causing an unacceptable level of pain. However, this technique is not suitable for every cataract surgeon or patient.     

Efficacy of topical plus intracameral anesthesia for cataract surgery in high myopia: randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of intracameral lidocaine supplementation of topical anesthesia during cataract surgery in eyes with high myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Ospedale San Pietro-Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy. METHODS: This prospective double-blind study comprised 120 highly myopic eyes with an axial length (AL) greater than 26.0 mm scheduled for routine cataract surgery. Cases were divided into 2 groups of 60 eyes each. One group received a placebo of balanced salt solution (BSS) (control group) and the other group, a supplement of 0.1 mL preservative-free lidocaine hydrochloride 1% injected in the capsular bag during hydrodissection (lidocaine group). Intraoperative pain was assessed by recording spontaneous patient reports of sensation of pain or ocular discomfort during 3 surgical stages: phaco tip insertion, irrigation/aspiration (I/A) system insertion for cortical aspiration, I/A system insertion for ophthalmic viscosurgical device removal after intraocular lens implantation. Postoperative pain was assessed on a visual analog scale (range 0 to 10). Data were compared by chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The overall mean AL was 28.58 mm (28.57 mm control group; 28.50 mm lidocaine group). Fewer patients in the lidocaine group reported intraoperative pain, ocular discomfort, or tissue manipulation (odds ratio=0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.80; P= .019). The mean postoperative pain score was 1.88+/-2.17 (SD) in the control group and 1.36+/-2.02 in the lidocaine group; the difference was not statistically significant (P= .21). CONCLUSION: Intracameral lidocaine supplementation for cataract surgery may improve intraoperative comfort under topical anesthesia in highly myopic eyes.     

Converting to topical anesthesia in cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the complications and difficulties encountered by surgeons converting from paraocular to topical anesthesia in cataract surgery and to evaluate patient pain and satisfaction with each procedure. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. METHODS: Three hundred eyes of 245 consecutive patients were prospectively assigned by permuted block-restricted randomization to receive topical (bupivacaine 0.75%) (Group 1; n = 136) or paraocular (Group 2; n = 163) anesthesia. The intraoperative conditions were judged by the surgeon. A numerical scale (0 to 10) was used to assess the degree of pain during administration of anesthesia, during surgery, and 1 and 24 hours postoperatively. Outcome measures were the number of complications and adverse events registered perioperatively and 4 months postoperatively as well as Snellen visual acuity and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) measured 1 week and 4 months after surgery. RESULTS: The success of posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation through a self-sealing clear corneal incision was very high (99.3% and 96.9% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively). One case (0.7%) in the topical group required vitrectomy and implantation of an anterior chamber IOL. Anesthesia-related difficulties were reported in about 40% of patients in Group 1 and 4% in Group 2 (P < .001). Supplemental paraocular anesthesia was required in 4 cases (2.9%) in the topical group. Sedative/analgesic medication given perioperatively was required significantly more often in Group 1 (13.2%) than in Group 2 (2.4%) (P < .01). Significantly more pain during surgery (P < .001) and 1 hour after surgery (P < .001) was reported in the topical group. In Group 1 69.9% and in Group 2 93.3% reported no pain during surgery (P < .001). Chemosis (1.8%), subconjunctival hemorrhage (1.2%), and periorbital hematoma (1.2%) were seen only in the paraocular group. Perioperatively, no severe complications occurred in Group 1 and the number of adverse events was less than in Group 2. Postoperatively, 2 cases of endophthalmitis developed in the topical group and none in the paraocular group. There was no between-group difference in outcome measures; a visual acuity of 20/40 or better was found in 87.8% of eyes in Group 1 and 84.9% in Group 2 4 months postoperatively, and the percentages of eyes with SIAs within 1.0 diopter of preoperative values were similar (78.6% and 73.3%, respectively). Patient preference for topical anesthesia appeared to be higher than for paraocular anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Paraocular anesthesia gave better analgesia than topical, but topical anesthesia provided acceptable analgesia during surgery and showed that intraocular procedures can be performed without akinesia. The surgeon converting to topical anesthesia may expect slight difficulty in 40% of cases and more severe difficulty in 7%. Surgically related complications were similar with both methods.     

Topical anesthesia for transpupillary silicone oil removal combined with cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To assess safety of topical anesthesia for transpupillary silicone oil removal in combination with cataract surgery. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany. METHODS: The clinical interventional study included 37 consecutive patients having transpupillary silicone oil removal combined with cataract surgery. Without exception, surgery was carried out in topical anesthesia for all patients. During the study period, there were no patients having transpupillary silicone oil removal in another type of local anesthesia than topical anesthesia. Topical anesthesia was achieved with oxybuprocaine 0.4% eyedrops installed 4 to 5 times prior to surgery. Cataract surgery was performed using the clear cornea technique with implantation of a foldable intraocular posterior chamber lens. Silicone oil was released through a planned posterior capsulotomy during cataract surgery prior to implantation of the intraocular lens (IOL). RESULTS: For all patients, surgery could be carried out in topical anesthesia without switching to peribulbar or any other type of anesthesia. None of the patients complained about severe pain intraoperatively or postoperatively. No severe complications such as expulsive hemorrhage, luxation of the IOL, or iris incarceration were encountered in any of the surgeries. CONCLUSION: Transpupillary silicone oil through a planned posterior capsulotomy during cataract surgery may be performed in topical surgery.     

Topical anesthesia with sedation in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation combined with 2-port pars plana vitrectomy in 105 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of topical anesthesia as an alternative to peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation combined with our modified 2-port pars plana vitrectomy technique (phacovitrectomy). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phacovitrectomy using topical anesthesia (4% lidocaine drops) was prospectively performed in 105 eyes with cataract and varied vitreoretinal pathology. In 75 eyes (71.4%), phacovitrectomy was combined with argon laser photocoagulation (endolaser). Preoperative and intraoperative sedation of varying degrees was necessary. Subjective pain and discomfort were graded from 1 (no pain or discomfort) to 4 (severe pain and discomfort). RESULTS: All patients had grade 1 pain and discomfort during most of the procedure. All patients had grade 2 (mild) pain and discomfort during pars plana sclerotomies, external bipolar cautery, and conjunctival closure. No patient required additional retrobulbar, peribulbar, or sub-Tenon's anesthesia. CONCLUSION: This technique avoids the risk of globe perforation, retrobulbar hemorrhage, and prolonged postoperative akinesia of the eye. With appropriate case selection, topical anesthesia is a safe and effective alternative to peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia in phacovitrectomy.     

Effect of the Honan intraocular pressure reducer in sub-Tenon's anesthesia

PURPOSE: To ascertain whether the Honan intraocular pressure reducer (HIPR) has an effect on the preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), surgeon's assessment of anesthesia, and patients' analgesic experience when sub-Tenon's anesthesia is used for routine cataract surgery. SETTING: Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh, Scotland. METHOD: Forty-five eyes of 45 patients having routine phacoemulsification cataract surgery were randomized to receive 10 minutes of ocular compression using the HIPR or no compression after administration of sub-Tenon's anesthesia. The IOP was measured immediately before and immediately and 10 minutes after sub-Tenon's anesthesia administration using a standard technique. One surgeon who was masked to the randomization process performed all injections and completed a questionnaire on aspects of the anesthetic block. Patients scored their level of analgesia during surgery. RESULTS: The mean rise in IOP immediately after administration of sub-Tenon's anesthesia was 1.39 mm Hg +/- 3.91 (SD) (95% confidence interval +0.22 to 2.57; P =.021). In the 22 patients who received compression, there was a mean IOP reduction of 4.20 +/- 2.74 mm Hg at 10 minutes. The mean difference between the compression and no-compression groups at 10 minutes was 4.99 mm Hg (P<.0001). There was no difference in the surgeon's scores for any aspect of the sub-Tenon's anesthesia (P>.05). All patients reported good levels of analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant reduction in IOP after compression using the HIPR. However, the rise in IOP after administration of sub-Tenon's anesthesia was small and the use of the HIPR did not make a significant difference in the effectiveness of the anesthesia to the surgeon or patients.     

Evaluation of eye patching after cataract surgery in topical anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Although postoperative eye patching is a common practice its background is not well known. Therefore the necessity of eye patching after cataract surgery in topical anesthesia from the medical point of view and the patients' subjective opinion was studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective and randomized study 133 patients received after cataract surgery either no covering of the eye (group1), a transparent eye shield for four hours (group 2), an eye pad for four hours (group 3) or an eye pad until the next morning (group 4). Clinical findings were noted and local symptoms, such as pain, foreign body sensation, tearing and photophobia were documented on a visual analogue scale (0 - 10). Furthermore, a questionnaire concerning the subjective opinion was handed out to the patient. RESULTS: The clinical findings revealed no significant differences between the groups. The mean values for local pain were 0.94 +/- 1.56, for the foreign body sensation 1.41 +/- 2.02, for tearing 0.99 +/- 1.8 and for photophobia 1.05 +/- 1.99. Comparing the groups there was significantly more pain and foreign body sensation reported by the patients in group 3, who received eye patching for 4 hours. 91 % of the unpatched patients had no discomfort, whereas 53 % of the patients wearing an eye pad until the next morning considered it as unnecessary. CONCLUSION: After cataract surgery in topical anesthesia only mild symptoms were noted. There were no significant differences between the groups in the objective clinical findings and the subjective feeling. These results indicate that after cataract surgery eye patching could be unnecessary.     

球筋膜下麻醉在玻璃体视网膜手术中应用的临床研究

目的 探讨球筋膜下麻醉在玻璃体视网膜手术中应用的安全性和有效性.方法 162例(162只眼)行玻璃体视网膜手术患者,随机分为A、B两组,由同一术者分别给予球筋膜下麻醉(A组,81例)或球后麻醉(B组,81例)后,实施手术操作.通过视觉模拟评分法评价麻醉镇痛效果,并对患者合作度和麻醉并发症进行考察对比.结果 162例患者在手术的四个阶段感觉无痛或轻度不适,平均疼痛评估分数如下:A组1.06±0.02,B组1.25±0.03.实施麻醉过程中A组(0.15±0.02)疼痛分数低于B组(1.04±0.03),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).手术过程中和术后0.5h、24h,两组患者疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者合作度较好或非常好的A组占88.9%,B组占87.7%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).A组多并发球结膜下出血,B组多并发眼睑水肿.结论 球筋膜下麻醉过程中与球后麻醉相比患者疼痛较轻,手术过程中可达到良好的镇痛效果和满意的患者合作度,是一种安全有效且并发症少的玻璃体视网膜手术麻醉方法.     

Topical anesthesia with or without propofol sedation versus retrobulbar/peribulbar anesthesia for cataract extraction: prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of intravenous sedation in addition to topical anesthesia during cataract extraction. SETTING: Helsinki University Eye Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. METHODS: Three hundred seventeen eyes of 291 consecutive patients having cataract surgery were prospectively randomized to receive topical (oxybuprocaine 0.4%, n = 96), combined (topical anesthesia and propofol sedation, n = 107), or retrobulbar/peribulbar (prilocaine 1.5%, n = 114) anesthesia. The intraoperative conditions were judged by the surgeon. A numerical scale (0 to 10) was used to assess the degree of pain during surgery. Outcome measures were the number of complications and adverse events registered perioperatively and 1 week postoperatively as well as Snellen visual acuity. RESULTS: The success of posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation through a self-sealing clear corneal incision was 97.9%, 96.3%, and 98.2% in the topical, combined, and retrobulbar/peribulbar groups, respectively. There was no difference among the groups in pain during surgery, frequency of complications, or outcome measures. One week postoperatively, visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 81.7%, 78.5%, and 77.5% of eyes in the topical, combined, and retrobulbar/peribulbar groups, respectively. The surgeon reported significantly fewer difficulties in the retrobulbar/peribulbar group (9.8%) than in the topical (26.0%) (P =.004) or combined (21.0%) (P =.036) groups. Additional sedative/analgesic medication given intraoperatively was required significantly more often in the topical (15.6%) than in the retrobulbar/peribulbar group (2.6%) (P =.002). Patients with bilateral surgery preferred combined anesthesia over retrobulbar/peribulbar anesthesia; however, there was no significant difference in patient acceptance among groups in patients having unilateral surgery. CONCLUSION: Intravenous propofol sedation added to topical anesthesia did not improve the operative conditions or surgical outcome. Retrobulbar/peribulbar anesthesia ensured the best surgical conditions. Patients in all anesthesia groups reported high satisfaction. However, patients having bilateral surgery seemed to prefer combined anesthesia over retrobulbar/peribulbar anesthesia.     

Early postoperative spikes of the intraocular pressure (IOP) following phacoemulsification in late-stage glaucoma

BACKGROUND: Modern cataract surgery with use of viscoelastics can induce remarkable early spikes of the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate risk factors for an early increase of the IOP following cataract surgery in eyes with end-stage glaucoma. Clear cornea phacoemulsification with implantation of a foldable acrylic lens was performed in 25 eyes with end-stage glaucoma (primary open-angle glaucoma including normal tension glaucoma or exfoliative glaucoma) either under topical anesthesia or under general anesthesia. In eyes with exfoliative glaucoma, trabecular aspiration was performed additionally. IOP measurements were conducted at the day before surgery, 4 hours following surgery and on the first morning following surgery. RESULTS: Cataract surgery was performed without complications. The mean IOP was 18.5 +/- 4.2 mm Hg with 2.1 +/- 1.0 topical medications. 4 hours postoperatively, mean IOP was 31.3 +/- 11.9 mm Hg. In eyes with exfoliative glaucoma (n = 12) the early postoperative IOP was 28.5 +/- 12.0 mm Hg, but without significant difference compared to eyes with POAG (n = 13). The early postoperative IOP showed significant correlation with the maximum IOP in patient's history (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with late-stage glaucoma can experience considerable early IOP spikes following uneventful cataract surgery, although preoperatively IOP is controlled by topical medications. Postoperative IOP monitoring is recommended at the day of surgery, especially if high IOP values are reported in patient's history.     

Surgeon experience and patient comfort during clear corneal phacoemulsification under topical local anesthesia

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient comfort during topical anesthesia clear corneal phacoemulsification surgery performed by a surgeon in the learning curve or by an experienced surgeon. SETTING: Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, Scotland, United Kingdom. METHODS: This study comprised 46 consecutive patients having phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia of proparacaine 0.5% (Proxymetacaine. Surgery was performed by a surgeon during his learning curve (n = 20) or by an experienced surgeon (n = 26). No sedation or intracameral anesthesia was used in either group. All patients had clear corneal phacoemulsification with foldable acrylic posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Each patient's subjective experience of overall pain perioperatively (period immediately surrounding and during surgery) and worst pain perceived during surgery was measured immediately after surgery using a 10-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in patient-reported pain scores for overall pain perioperatively (P =.47, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and the worst pain perceived during surgery (P =.32, Wilcoxon rank sum test). CONCLUSIONS: Topical anesthesia with proparacaine provided similar and reasonable analgesic effects in patients having surgery by a surgeon in the learning curve and those having surgery by an experienced surgeon. The discomfort perceived during surgery performed by an experienced surgeon was less, although not statistically significantly different.     

Intracameral lidocaine as supplement to classic topical anesthesia for relieving ocular pain in cataract surgery

AIM: To evaluate safety, efficacy, and patient adherence of intracameral lidocaine as supplement of classic topical anesthetic drops in cataract surgery. METHODS: A prospective and controlled trial including a large cohort of 1650 individuals suffering with bilateral cataract not complicated, in program by phacoemulsification surgery, were randomly assigned to 2 different groups for the type of anesthesia received, 0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride (INN) drops, and INN drops associated to intracameral 1% lidocaine hydrochloride monohydrate. At the end of surgery, tables were assigned to each patient indicating the degree of pain (0-3) felt during the operation. RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of patients in group 1 declared to have not felt any pain against the 77% of patients in group 2. Fifty-nine percent of patients in group 1 complained about only a slight discomfort against 20% of group 2 patients. Only a small percentage of patients in group 1 (5%) admitted severe pain, while no patient in group 2 admitted severe pain. Four patients of group 2 reported an episode of transient amaurosis, lasting several hours after surgery. CONCLUSION: Intracameral administration of lidocaine is a simple and secure method able to increase the analgesia during the cataract surgery, eliminating the discomfort and increasing also the cooperation of the patients during the steps of manipulation.     

Lidocaine versus ropivacaine for topical anesthesia in cataract surgery(1)

PURPOSE: To assess the anesthetic efficacy and safety of topical ropivacaine versus topical lidocaine in cataract surgery. SETTING: Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. METHODS: This prospective controlled randomized double-blind study comprised 64 patients scheduled for planned routine cataract extraction. Patients were randomized into 2 groups; 1 received topical ropivacaine 1% and the other, topical lidocaine 4%. The duration of surgery, intraoperative and early postoperative complications, and the need for supplemental intracameral anesthesia were recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative subjective pain was quantified by patients using a scale from 1 to 10. An endothelial cell count was performed preoperatively and 2 months after surgery. RESULTS: The mean endothelial cell density decreased from 2334 cells/mm(2) +/- 496 (SD) to 2016 +/- 674 cells/mm(2) in the ropivacaine group and from 2519 +/- 404 cells/mm(2) to 1847 +/- 607 cells/mm(2) in the lidocaine group. The difference in cell density between groups was not significant before (P =.154) or after surgery (P =.329); however, the difference in mean cell loss between groups was statistically significant (P =.031). The duration of surgery and intraoperative complications were the same in both groups. Four patients in the ropivacaine group and 5 in the lidocaine group required supplemental anesthesia (P >.05). The mean subjective analog pain score was slightly higher in the lidocaine group (P >.05). The day after surgery, 12 eyes in the ropivacaine group and 6 in the lidocaine group had transient corneal edema (P =.150). CONCLUSIONS: Topical ropivacaine performed at least as well as topical lidocaine in efficacy and safety in cataract surgery. It provided sufficient and long-lasting analgesia without the need for supplemental intracameral anesthesia in most cases.