Epidemiologic analysis and genotypic characterization of a nosocomial outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

We are reporting on a nosocomial outbreak of 213 cases of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus infection involving 2,812 enterococcal isolates from patients over a period of 36 months. In 1990, the Enterococcus faecium vancomycin susceptibility rate was found to be 85.7% (36 of 42 cases), and an incidence of 10.9% (42 of 383) was noted. The 1991 data showed E. faecium with a vancomycin susceptibility rate of 61.8% (110 of 178) and an incidence of 26.0% (178 of 684). Subsequently, in 1992, the incidence of E. faecium increased to 34.0% (599 of 1,745), with a decreased vancomycin susceptibility rate of 25.8% (155 of 599). The E. faecalis vancomycin susceptibility rate remained near 97% (1,768 of 1,823) over the 36-month period. Of 115 vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) clinical isolates identified by the MicroScan MIC Combo-6 panels (Baxter Healthcare, Sacramento, Calif.), the agar dilution method indicated the resistance rate to be 92.3% (106 of 115) (high level), 3.5% (4 of 115) midlevel, and 3.5% (4 of 115) (low level). Genotypic characterization of 32 different VRE isolates by field-inversion gel electrophoresis demonstrated 19 dissimilar restriction endonuclease patterns, with 9 patterns associated with VRE quinolone resistance. Statistical analysis of case-control data for 32 patients with VRE infections indicated a positive association with intrabdominal surgical procedures (odds ratio, 24.12), multidrug therapy (odds ratio, 37.80), preexposure to vancomycin (odds ratio, 20.21), and death (odds ratio, 17.50).     

Outbreak of Vancomycin-Susceptible Enterococcus faecium Containing the Wild-Type vanA Gene

Accurate detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is essential in preventing transmission in health care settings. Chromogenic media are widely used for screening VRE because of fast turnaround times (TAT) and high sensitivity. We report an outbreak of Enterococcus faecium bearing vanA yet susceptible to vancomycin (vancomycin-variable Enterococcus [VVE]). Between October 2009 to March 2011, clinical and screening specimens (n = 14,747) were screened for VRE using VRE-selective medium and/or PCR. VVE isolates were genotyped to determine relatedness. Plasmids from these isolates were characterized by sequencing. Overall, 52 VVE isolates were identified, comprising 15% of all VRE isolates identified. Isolates demonstrated growth on Brilliance VRE agar (Oxoid) at 24 h of incubation but did not grow on brain heart infusion agar with 6 μg/ml vancomycin (Oxoid) or bile esculin azide agar with 6 μg/ml vancomycin (Oxoid) and were susceptible to vancomycin. Genotyping of 20 randomly selected VVE isolates revealed that 15/20 were identical, while 5 were highly related. PCR of the VVE transposon confirmed the presence of vanHAXY gene cluster; however, vanS (sensor) and vanR (regulator) genes were absent. The outbreak was controlled through routine infection control measures. We report an emergence of a fit strain of E. faecium containing vanA yet susceptible to vancomycin. Whether this new strain represents VRE has yet to be determined; however, unique testing procedures are required for reliable identification of VVE.     

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections in Korea

Enterococci recently became the second-to-third most commonly isolated organism from nosocomial infections. Enterococci are intrinsically more resistant to many antimicrobial agents and often show acquired resistance to many antimicrobial agents including high-level aminoglycosides. With the increased use of vancomycin, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) has become an important nosocomial pathogen. In Korea, the proportion of VRE among all enterococcal of VRE is no longer low in some settings and recent observations of a sudden increase of VRE isolation in several hospitals in Korea suggests that VRE infection may become a serious problem in the near future. The most important considerations are that vancomycin-resistant genes may spread to other highly virulent genera, such as MRSA, and that there are no approved and convincingly effective antibiotics for the treatment of VRE. Therefore, current efforts have concentrated on limiting the spread of these organisms within the hospital environment. Prudent use of antimicrobial agents and strict adherence to preventive measures such as aggressive communication, education, and infection control practices are essential to control the spread of this organism. However, hospital infection control protocols and the laboratory support they require are costly in terms of space and supplies, as well as in personnel resources. These factors add further pressure to already stretched hospital budgets. Nevertheless, policies or programs defining and managing VRE infection or colonization should be established and now is the time to enforce an overall management strategy against VRE.     

Epidemiology and Control of an Outbreak of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in the Intensive Care Units

Purpose

This study was aimed to describe a vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) outbreak across three intensive care units (ICUs) of a Korean hospital from September 2006 to January 2007 and the subsequent control strategies.

Materials and Methods

We simultaneously implemented multifaceted interventions to control the outbreak, including establishing a VRE cohort ward, active rectal surveillance cultures, daily extensive cleaning of environmental surfaces and environmental cultures, antibiotic restriction, and education of hospital staff. We measured weekly VRE prevalence and rectal acquisition rates and characterized the VRE isolates by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the vanA gene and Sma1-pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

Results

During the outbreak, a total of 50 patients infected with VRE were identified by clinical and surveillance cultures, and 46 had vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF). PFGE analysis of VREF isolates from initial two months disclosed 6 types and clusters of two major types. The outbreak was terminated 5 months after implementation of the interventions: The weekly prevalence rate decreased from 9.1/100 patients-day in September 2006 to 0.6/100 by the end of January 2007, and the rectal acquisition rates also dropped from 6.9/100 to 0/100 patients-day.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that an aggressive multifaceted control strategy is a rapid, effective approach for controlling a VRE outbreak.     

Use of surveillance cultures and enteral vancomycin to control methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a paediatric intensive care unit

This study assessed the effects of throat and gut surveillance, combined with enteral vancomycin, on gut overgrowth, transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), infections and mortality in patients admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A 4-year prospective observational study was undertaken with 1241 children who required ventilation for >or=4 days. Patients identified as MRSA carriers following surveillance cultures of throat and rectum received enteral vancomycin. Twenty-nine (2.4%) children carried MRSA, 19 on admission and nine during treatment in the PICU; one patient was not able to be evaluated. Overgrowth was present in 22 (75%) of the carriers. Ten (0.8%) children developed 21 MRSA infections (15 exogenous infections in eight children at a median of 8 days (IQR 3-10.5); five primary endogenous infections at a median of 3 days (IQR 1-25) in three children when they were in overgrowth status; one child developed both types of infection). Enteral vancomycin reduced gut overgrowth significantly, completely preventing secondary endogenous infections. Transmission occurred on nine occasions over a period of 4 years. Four patients died, two (5.9%) with MRSA infection, giving a mortality (11.8%) similar to the study population (9.8%). No emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci or S. aureus with intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin was detected. A policy based on throat and gut surveillance, combined with enteral vancomycin, for critically-ill children who were MRSA carriers was found to be effective and safe, and challenges the recommended guidelines of nasal swabbing followed by topical mupirocin.     

Successful control of a hospital-wide vancomycin-resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Enterococcus faecium</Emphasis> outbreak in France

We describe the control of a hospital-wide vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) outbreak in a 2,000-bed university hospital located on three different sites in Clermont-Ferrand, France. From January 2004 to April 2007, 220 VRE cases were identified. Overall, 28 different wards had at least one case. All of the strains expressed a high level of resistance to vancomycin and to teicoplanin carried by the vanA gene. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of the strains revealed that they were clonally related. Control measures consisted of implementing a strategy of VRE screening by rectal swab, reinforcing hand hygiene practices and taking contact precautions. Recommendations for a restricted use of specific antibiotics were sent to each physician. Alcohol-based handrubs were provided throughout the hospital and the staff underwent training for their use. Compliance with contact precautions, including the use of clean non-sterile gloves and single-use gowns, was reinforced. VRE cases were assigned systematically to a single-bed room. In October 2007, no new VRE carriage has been detected for 7 months and no clinical samples had been VRE-positive for 10 months. In conclusion, a hospital-wide VRE outbreak was successfully controlled by a strategy based on routine screening, the reinforcement of hand hygiene and taking barrier precautions.     

Selection of a Teicoplanin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Mutant during an Outbreak Caused by Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci with the VanB Phenotype

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have recently become an increasing problem in hospitals in Poland, being responsible for a growing number of nosocomial outbreaks. In this work, we have analyzed the second outbreak of VRE with the VanB phenotype to be identified in the country. It was caused by clonal dissemination of a single strain of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRES) and horizontal transmission of vancomycin resistance genes among several vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREM) strains. Two similar restriction fragment length polymorphism types of the vanB gene cluster characterized VRES and VREM isolates, and they both contained the same vanB2 variant of the vanB gene. Two vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (VSEM) isolates, recovered from the same wards during the outbreak, proved to be related to certain VREM isolates and could represent endemic strains that had acquired vancomycin resistance. One VSEM and four VREM isolates, all identified in the same patient, belonged to a single clone, although they revealed remarkable diversity in terms of susceptibility, PFGE patterns, plasmid content, and number of vanB gene cluster copies. Most probably they reflected the dynamic evolution of an E. faecium strain in the course of infection of a single patient. One of the VREM isolates turned out to be resistant to teicoplanin, which coincided with the use of this antibiotic in the patient's therapy. Its vanB gene variant differed by a single mutation from that found in other isolates; however, it also lacked a large part of the vanB gene cluster, including the regulatory genes vanR(B) and -S(B), and the vancomycin-inducible promoter P(YB). Expression of the resistance genes vanH(B), -B, and -X(B) was constitutive in the mutant, and this phenomenon was responsible for its unusual phenotype.     

Outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. in an Italian general intensive care unit

Following the identification of two clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) from intensive care unit (ICU) patients, a surveillance programme detected that six of eight ICU patients were colonised by VRE. Standard epidemic control measures were instituted in the ICU. During a 16-month period, 13 (2.5%) of 509 ICU patients had VRE-positive swabs upon admission, and 43 (8.7%) of 496 VRE-negative patients were colonised by VRE in the ICU. Patients who acquired VRE in the ICU had a longer ICU stay (p < 0.0001). No other statistically significant differences were demonstrated. Two patients had documented infection (infection/colonisation index, 3.6%; overall VRE infection frequency, 0.4%), but both recovered and were discharged. VRE colonisation did not increase the mortality rate. Automated ribotyping identified three clusters containing, respectively, the first 52 Enterococcus faecium isolates, two Enterococcus faecalis isolates, and two further isolates of E. faecium. Multilocus sequence typing demonstrated that two E. faecium isolates representative of the two ribotypes belonged to sequence types 78 and 18, and that these two isolates belonged to the epidemic lineage C1, which includes isolates with a wide circulation in northern Italy. The outbreak was controlled by continuous implementation of the infection control programme, and by the opening of a new unit with an improved structural design and hand-washing facilities.     

Colonization, bloodstream infection, and mortality caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococcus early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Bloodstream infection caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) is associated with very high mortality among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) recipients. However, it remains unclear whether VRE bloodstream infection directly causes mortality in the early posttransplant period or is simply a marker of poor outcome. To determine the risk factors for VRE bloodstream infection and its effect on outcome, we followed 92 patients screened for stool colonization by VRE upon admission for alloHSCT. Patient records were reviewed to determine outcomes, including mortality and microbiologic failure. Colonization by VRE was extremely common, occurring in 40.2% of patients. VRE bloodstream infection developed in 34.2% of colonized patients by day +35, compared to 1.8% without VRE colonization (P < .01). VRE bloodstream infection was associated with a significant decrement in survival and frequent microbiologic failure, despite treatment with linezolid and/or daptomycin. Five (35.7%) of 14 patients with VRE bloodstream infection had attributable mortality or contributing mortality from the infection. Strain typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis identified 9 different VRE strains among the 37 colonized patients and 5 patients with different strains recovered from the stool and the blood. In conclusion, stool screening effectively identified patients at extremely high risk for VRE bloodstream infection. The high mortality of VRE in the early posttransplant period supports the use of empiric antibiotics with activity against VRE during periods of fever and neutropenia in colonized patients.     

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci

After they were first identified in the mid-1980s, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) spread rapidly and became a major problem in many institutions both in Europe and the United States. Since VRE have intrinsic resistance to most of the commonly used antibiotics and the ability to acquire resistance to most of the current available antibiotics, either by mutation or by receipt of foreign genetic material, they have a selective advantage over other microorganisms in the intestinal flora and pose a major therapeutic challenge. The possibility of transfer of vancomycin resistance genes to other gram-positive organisms raises significant concerns about the emergence of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. We review VRE, including their history, mechanisms of resistance, epidemiology, control measures, and treatment.     

Proficiency of determination of vancomycin susceptibility in enterococci by clinical laboratories in Taiwan.

Eighty clinical microbiology laboratories in Taiwan were evaluated for proficiency in the determination of vancomycin susceptibility of enterococci. Each laboratory was given 1 vancomycin-sensitive isolate and 3 vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) isolates to determine the levels of vancomycin resistance. Among a total of 240 tests performed, 153 (63.8%) correctly determined the levels of vancomycin resistance of the survey isolates. Seventy eight (98%) of the 80 laboratories accurately identified the high level of vancomycin resistant isolates [Enterococcus faecalis; minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >256 microg/mL]. Seventy two laboratories (90%) correctly determined the level of vancomycin resistance of another VRE with a vancomycin MIC of 64 microg/mL. Only 3 of the 80 laboratories correctly determined the intermediate-level vancomycin resistant isolates (Enterococcus casseliflavus; MIC = 8 microg/mL). Eight laboratories reported the vancomycin-susceptible isolate as being vancomycin-resistant or of intermediate susceptibility. This survey demonstrated that clinical microbiology laboratories in Taiwan are proficient in detecting high-level but not low-level VRE, suggesting a need to improve their proficiency in VRE detection.     

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia: comparison of clinical features and outcome between Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens. This study was conducted to clarify the clinical features and outcome of patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia. METHODS: Patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia treated at a medical center in northern Taiwan between November 1998 and July 2006 were reviewed. Clinical and bacteriological characteristics of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis were compared. RESULTS: Twelve patients (6 males and 6 females) were included for analyses. The mean age was 69.3 years (range, 40 to 86 years), and 8 cases (66.7%) were older than 65 years. All patients had underlying disease. Two patients received total hip replacement before development of VRE bacteremia. Twelve patients had prior exposure to broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy. Ten patients had prior intensive care unit stay and prior mechanical ventilation before VRE bacteremia. All of the patients (n = 12) had an intravascular catheter in place. Bacteremia was caused by E. faecalis in 4 patients and by E. faecium in eight. The portals of entry included urinary tract (8.3%), skin, soft tissue and bone (41.7%) and unknown sources (50.0%). E. faecium showed a higher rate of resistance to ampicillin and teicoplanin than E. faecalis (87.5% vs 0.0%, p=0.01). The 60-day mortality rate was higher in patients with E. faecium bacteremia than E. faecalis bacteremia (62.5% vs 0.0%), although statistical significance was not obtained (p=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: VRE bacteremia may have an impact on the mortality and morbidity of hospitalized patients. Patients with bacteremia caused by vancomycin-resistant E. faecium had a grave prognosis, especially immunosuppressed patients. The prudent use of antibiotics and strict enforcement of infection control may prevent further emergence and spread of VRE.     

Controlling a vancomycin-resistant enterococci outbreak in a Brazilian teaching hospital

The purpose of this article was to describe a 2.5-year interventional program designed to control the dissemination after a large hospital outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in a tertiary-care university hospital. A VRE working group was designated to work specifically on controlling VRE intrahospital dissemination after the detection of the first VRE infection at in our hospital in June 2007. The intervention consisted in the interruption of new admissions during a period of 15?days and closure of the index case unit, microbiological surveillance of rectal swabs for VRE, cohorting patients and staff, immediate application of contact precautions, and continuous education. From July 2007 to December 2009, 8,692 rectal swabs were cultured for VRE and 321 (3.7%) were positive. An expressive reduction of the detection of new positive rectal swabs cultures was seen during the year 2009 (1.5%) when compared to 2008 (4.2%) and 2007 (7.2%) (p?<?0.005). The annual ratio of VRE per 1,000 admissions reduced from 20.3 in 2007 to 10.07 and 3.82 in 2008 and 2009, respectively (p?<?0.001). The continuous microbiologic surveillance for VRE and strict and prompt contact precautions for VRE patients were the fundamental aids in the control of VRE.     

Colonization by vancomycin-resistant enterococci of the intestinal tract of patients in intensive care units from French general hospitals

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of fecal carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) by patients hospitalized in intensive care units from 24 French general hospitals.
Method: Rectal swabs were obtained from 647 patients hospitalized in intensive care units during the month of June 1994 and plated on agar medium selective for vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The glycopeptide resistance phenotypes and genotypes of the enterococci detected were characterized.
Results: Thirty-two of 647 patients (4.9%) carried VRE. Thirteen strains (2%) were identified as Enterococcus faecium and 19 (2.9%) as Enterococcus gallinarum or Enterococcus casseliflavus. None of these strains was highly resistant to gentamicin. The E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus strains contained the van C1 and van C2 genes, respectively. The E. faecium strains were highly resistant to vancomycin and teicoplanin and carried the vanA gene. No infection due to VRE was observed during the study period. Pulsed-field gel analysis of total DNA following digestion with Smal or Ksp l from 13 VanA-type E. faecium strains revealed intra- and inter-hospital strain heterogeneity. However, the finding of isolates with indistinguishable pulsed-field types within the same ward and in two medical centers suggests patient-to-patient transmission or a common source. Four E. faecium strains were isolated within 48 h after admission of patients.
Conclusions: These results indicate that VRE form part of the normal flora of patients and that, despite the actual scarcity of infections due to VRE, there is a potential risk for dissemination of these strains in French hospitals.     

Difficulties in detection and identification of Enterococcus faecium with low-level inducible resistance to vancomycin, during a hospital outbreak

Between June and November 2004, a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) strain was isolated from 13 patients in the haematology/bone marrow transplant unit. There were difficulties in identifying the organism, which had low-level, inducible vancomycin resistance, and standard screening methods did not reveal carriage in patients or their contacts. These technical failures led to spread of VRE and delays in providing appropriate management, which might otherwise have been avoided. Therefore, we reviewed our laboratory methods and compared three identification systems to determine which would best identify this VRE strain. The VITEK  2 (BioMerieux) correctly identified, as E. faecium , only two of 16 isolates, whereas API Rapid ID 32 Strep (BioMerieux) and Phoenix 100 (Becton Dickinson and Co.) correctly identified 13 of 15 and 12 of 13 isolates tested, respectively. Isolates from urine, tested by the CLSI disk diffusion method, were apparently susceptible or of intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin, upon primary testing. VITEK  2 and Phoenix 100 identified all isolates as vancomycin-resistant, although the MICs, measured by Etest, were in the susceptible range for three of 16 isolates. Reducing the vancomycin concentration in screening media substantially increased the sensitivity for detection of VRE. Isolates were characterized as genotype van B2/3 by PCR and were indistinguishable from each other by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. VRE with low-level inducible resistance can be missed by routine screening methods. Better identification and screening methods for detection of low-level vancomycin resistance are needed to improve surveillance and prevent transmission of VRE.     

A comparison of polymerase chain reaction and phenotyping for rapid speciation of enterococci and detection of vancomycin resistance.

This study aimed to ascertain the ability of the microbiology laboratory to detect and identify catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci with particular reference to vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Twenty-seven reference strains and 42 prospectively collected catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci were screened by agar dilution breakpoint susceptibility and linked biochemical methods in routine use. Ability to speciate organisms was then compared using: (i) a multiplex polymerase chain reaction, designed to detect gene sequences specific to Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium, and vancomycin resistance (van) genes; (ii) a commercial "API 20 strep" (iii) an algorithm using individual tests from a commercial API 20 strep strip; and (iv) the same algorithm utilising traditional phenotyping methods. All vancomycin resistant catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci were detected by an agar dilution screening plate containing 4 micrograms/ml of vancomycin. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected all enterococci with van genes, speciated all vancomycin-sensitive E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates and excluded non-enterococcal vancomycin-resistant catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci. Algorithm-based methods speciated 41 of the 42 study isolates (98%). The API 20 strep correctly identified only 25 (60%) of these organisms, 38 of which were vancomycin-sensitive E. faecalis. VRE are detected by current screening methods for vancomycin-resistant catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci in this laboratory. API 20 strep, currently used to speciate catalase-negative Gram-positive cocci, is less reliable and should be replaced. Algorithm-based phenotyping by either method tested is more reliable for speciation than API 20 strep in its recommended form. Compared to the other methods tested, PCR is a rapid, accurate and inexpensive method of detecting and speciating vancomycin-resistant enterococci and it provides important extra information impacting on clinical therapy and infection control.