Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis and staging of primary and recurrent malignant head and neck tumours in comparison with conventional imaging methods [including ultrasonography, radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)], physical examination, panendoscopy and biopsies in clinical routine. A total of 54 patients (13 female, 41 male, age 61.3+/-12 years) were investigated retrospectively. Three groups were formed. In group I, 18F-FDG PET was performed in 15 patients to detect unknown primary cancers. In group II, 24 studies were obtained for preoperative staging of proven head and neck cancer. In group III, 18F-FDG PET was used in 15 patients to monitor tumour recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. In all patients, imaging was obtained at 70 min after the intravenous administration of 180 MBq 18F-FDG. In 11 of the 15 patients in group I, the primary cancer could be found with 18F-FDG, yielding a detection rate of 73.3%. In 4 of the 15 patients, CT findings were also suggestive of the primary cancer but were nonetheless equivocal. In these patients, 18F-FDG showed increased 18F-FDG uptake by the primary tumour, which was confirmed by histology. One patient had recurrence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with 18F-FDG PET, but was detected by CT. In three cases, the primary cancer could not be found with any imaging method. Among the 24 patients in group II investigated for staging purposes, 18F-FDG PET detected a total of 13 local and three distant lymph node metastases, whereas the conventional imaging methods detected only nine local and one distant lymph node metastases. The results of 18F-FDG PET led to an upstaging in 5/24 (20.8%) patients. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in 5/24 (20.8%). There was one false positive result using 18F-FDG PET. Among the 15 patients of group III with suspected recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, 18F-FDG was true positive in 7/15 (46.6%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). The conventional imaging methods were true positive in 5/15 (33.3%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). One false negative (6.6%) and three false positive findings (20%) on 18F-FDG PET were due to inflamed tissue. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in three (20%) and false negative in three cases (20%). It is concluded that in comparison to conventional diagnostic methods, 18F-FDG PET provides additional and clinically relevant information in the detection of primary and metastatic carcinomas as well as in the early detection of recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. 18F-FDG PET should therefore be performed early in clinical routine, usually before CT or MRI.     

Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of simultaneous ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI compared to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT as well as their single components in head and neck cancer patients.

Methods

In a prospective study 17 patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for staging or follow-up and an additional ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI scan with whole-body imaging and dedicated examination of the neck. MRI, CT and PET images as well as PET/MRI and PET/CT examinations were evaluated independently and in a blinded fashion by two reader groups. Results were compared with the reference standard (final diagnosis determined in consensus using all available data including histology and follow-up). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

Results

A total of 23 malignant tumours were found with the reference standard. PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 82.7 %, a specificity of 87.3 %, a PPV of 73.2 % and a NPV of 92.4 %. Corresponding values for PET/MRI were 80.5, 88.2, 75.6 and 92.5 %. No statistically significant difference in diagnostic capability could be found between PET/CT and PET/MRI. Evaluation of the PET part from PET/CT revealed highest sensitivity of 95.7 %, and MRI showed best specificity of 96.4 %. There was a high inter-rater agreement in all modalities (Cohen’s kappa 0.61–0.82).

Conclusion

PET/MRI of patients with head and neck cancer yielded good diagnostic capability, similar to PET/CT. Further studies on larger cohorts to prove these first results seem justified.     

18F-FET PET compared with 18F-FDG PET and CT in patients with head and neck cancer.

Recent studies suggest a somewhat selective uptake of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) in cerebral gliomas and in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and a good distinction between tumor and inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of 18F-FET PET in patients with SCC of the head and neck region by comparing that tracer with 18F-FDG PET and CT. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with suspected head and neck tumors underwent 18F-FET PET, 18F-FDG PET, and CT within 1 wk before operation. After coregistration, the images were evaluated by 3 independent observers and an ROC analysis was performed, with the histopathologic result used as a reference. Furthermore, the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) in the lesions were determined. RESULTS: In 18 of 21 patients, histologic examination revealed SCC, and in 2 of these patients, a second SCC tumor was found at a different anatomic site. In 3 of 21 patients, inflammatory tissue and no tumor were identified. Eighteen of 20 SCC tumors were positive for both 18F-FDG uptake and 18F-FET uptake, one 0.3-cm SCC tumor was detected neither with 18F-FDG PET nor with 18F-FET PET, and one 0.7-cm SCC tumor in a 4.3-cm ulcer was overestimated as a 4-cm tumor on 18F-FDG PET and missed on 18F-FET PET. Inflammatory tissue was positive for 18F-FDG uptake (SUV, 3.7-4.7) but negative for 18F-FET uptake (SUV, 1.3-1.6). The SUVs of 18F-FDG in SCC were significantly higher (13.0 +/- 9.3) than those of 18F-FET (4.4 +/- 2.2). The ROC analysis showed significantly superior detection of SCC with (18)F-FET PET or 18F-FDG PET than with CT. No significant difference (P = 0.71) was found between 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FET PET. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET was 93%, specificity was 79%, and accuracy was 83%. 18F-FET PET yielded a lower sensitivity of 75% but a substantially higher specificity of 95% (accuracy, 90%). CONCLUSION: 18F-FET may not replace 18F-FDG in the PET diagnostics of head and neck cancer but may be a helpful additional tool in selected patients, because 18F-FET PET might better differentiate tumor tissue from inflammatory tissue. The sensitivity of 18F-FET PET in SCC, however, was inferior to that of 18F-FDG PET because of lower SUVs.     

Assessment of clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET in patients with head and neck cancer: a probability analysis

The purpose of this study was to calculate disease probabilities based on data of patients with head and neck cancer in the register of our institution and to perform a systematic review of the available data on the accuracy of PET in the primary assessment and follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer. The pre-test probability of head and neck cancer among patients in our institutional data registry was assessed. Then the published literature was selected and appraised according to a standard protocol of systematic reviews. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data on study characteristics, quality and accuracy. Accuracy data were used to form 2 x 2 contingency tables and were pooled to produce summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and summary likelihood ratios for positive and negative testing. Finally post-test probabilities were calculated on the basis of the pre-test probabilities of this patient group. All patients had cytologically or histologically proven cancer. The prevalence of additional lymph node metastases on PET in staging examinations was 19.6% (11/56), and that of locoregional recurrence on restaging PET was 28.6% (12/42). In the primary assessment of patients, PET had positive and negative likelihood ratios of 3.9 (2.56-5.93) and 0.24 (0.14-0.41), respectively. Disease probabilities were therefore 49.4% for a positive test result and 5.7% for a negative test result. In the assessment of recurrence these values were 3.96 (2.8-5.6) and 0.16 (0.1-0.25), resulting in probabilities of 49.7% and 3.8%. PET evaluation for involvement of lymph nodes had positive and negative likelihood ratios of 17.26 (10.9-27.3) and 0.19 (0.13-0.27) for primary assessment and 11.0 (2.93-41.24) and 0.14 (0.01-1.88) for detection of recurrence. The probabilities were 81.2% and 4.5% for primary assessment and 73.3% and 3.4% for assessment of recurrence. It is concluded that in this clinical setting the main advantage of PET is the ability to reliably rule out the presence of disease in both staging and restaging. Further research is required to derive probabilities for individual patients from sequential testing as applied in the diagnostic work-up of patients with head and neck cancer.     

Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer

The aims of this study were to investigate the detection of cervical lymph node metastases of head and neck cancer by positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and to perform a prospective comparison with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), sonographic and histopathological findings. Sixty patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma were studied by PET imaging before surgery. Preoperative endoscopy (including biopsy), CT, MRI and sonography of the cervical region were performed in all patients within 2 weeks preceding ¹⁸F-FDG whole-body PET. FDG PET images were analysed visually and quantitatively for objective assessment of regional tracer uptake. Histopathology of the resected neck specimens revealed a total of 1284 lymph nodes, 117 of which showed metastatic involvement. Based on histopathological findings, FDG PET correctly identified lymph node metastases with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 94% (P<10^–6). CT and MRI visualized histologically proven lymph node metastases with a sensitivity of 82% (specificity 85%) and 80% (specificity 79%), respectively (P<10^–6). Sonography revealed a sensitivity of 72% (P<10^–6). The comparison of ¹⁸F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities demonstrated statistically significant correlations (PET vs CT, P = 0.017; PET vs MRI, P = 0.012; PET vs sonography, P = 0.0001). Quantitative analysis of FDG uptake in lymph node metastases using body weight-based standardized uptake values (SUV_BW) showed no significant correlation between FDG uptake (3.7±2.0) and histological grading of tumour-involved lymph nodes (P = 0.9). Interestingly, benign lymph nodes had increased FDG uptake as a result of inflammatory reactions (SUV_BW-range: 2–15.8). This prospective, histopathologically controlled study confirms FDG PET as the procedure with the highest sensitivity and specificity for detecting lymph node metastases of head and neck cancer and has become a routine method in our University Medical Center. Furthermore, the optimal diagnostic modality may be a fusion image showing the increased metabolism of the tumour and the anatomical localization. Received 17 February and in revised form 12 June 1998     

18F-FLT PET for visualization of laryngeal cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.

The feasibility of (18)F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine PET (FLT PET) for detecting laryngeal cancer was investigated and compared with (18)F-FDG PET. METHODS: Eleven patients diagnosed with or strongly suspected of having recurrent laryngeal cancer and 10 patients with histologically proven primary laryngeal cancer underwent attenuation-corrected (18)F-FLT PET imaging 60 min after injection of a median of 213 MBq (range, 175-400 MBq) (18)F-FLT and attenuation-corrected (18)F-FDG PET imaging 90 min after injection of a median of 340 MBq (range, 165-650 MBq) (18)F-FDG. All patients were staged by endoscopy and CT according to the Union Internationale Contre la Cancer TNM staging system. All patients underwent biopsy of the laryngeal area after imaging. Lesions seen on (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FLT PET were compared with histopathologic results. Mean SUVs, maximum SUVs, and tumor-to-nontumor (TNT) ratios were calculated for (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG. Wilcoxon nonparametric testing was used for comparison of (18)F-FDG with (18)F-FLT uptake. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to correlate mean SUVs, maximum SUVs, and TNT ratios of (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FLT PET. Two-tailed P values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FLT PET detected laryngeal cancer correctly in 15 of 17 patients. One lesion judged as positive on (18)F-FDG PET turned out to be normal tissue. Of 2 lesions judged as positive on (18)F-FLT PET, 1 turned out to be inflammation and the other to be normal tissue. Maximum SUVs were 3.3 (range, 1.9-8.5) for (18)F-FDG and 1.6 (range, 1.0-5.7) for (18)F-FLT (P < 0.001). Mean SUVs were 2.7 (range, 1.5-6.5) for (18)F-FDG and 1.2 (range, 0.8-3.8) for (18)F-FLT (P < 0.001). TNT was 1.9 (range, 1.3-4.7) for (18)F-FDG and 1.5 (range, 1.1-3.5) for (18)F-FLT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The numbers of laryngeal cancers detected with (18)F-FLT PET and (18)F-FDG PET were equal. In laryngeal cancer, the uptake of (18)F-FDG is higher than that of (18)F-FLT.     

18F-FDG PET显像在头颈部肿瘤中的应用

目的 探讨^18F-脱氧葡萄糖（FDG）PET显像在头颈部肿瘤中的应用.方法 39例头颈部肿瘤患者,共行56次^18F-FDG PET检查.图像分析采用视觉和半定量（标准摄取值,SUV）方法.结果 ①5例治疗前患者,PET显像使3例改变了分期;34例治疗后患者中,PET显像发现6例头颈部有残存或复发灶,11例淋巴结转移,4例肺部转移,3例骨转移.②22例PET显像阳性患者中,20例经手术病理检查或随访证实,2例假阳性;17例PET显像为阴性的患者均得到随访证实.PET显像用于头颈部肿瘤病情监测的灵敏度为100%,特异性为89.5%,准确性为94.9%.③21例患者有近期CT或MRI检查结果,其中6例PET显像发现了CT或MRI未发现的局部复发病灶和转移淋巴结.6例患者CT或MRI提示有肿瘤复发或转移,但PET显像结果阴性,并经随访证实.④9例患者多次进行PET检查随访,其中5例病灶消失,3例病情进展,1例无变化.结论 ^18F-FDG PET显像可较准确地发现头颈部肿瘤的残存、转移和复发病灶,并为肿瘤分期提供重要依据,但应与炎症鉴别.     

Predictive value of pre-therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT for the outcome of 18F-FDG PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive role of pre-therapy fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake parameters of primary tumour in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on FDG-positive volume—positron emission tomography (PET) gross tumour volume (PET-GTV).

Methods

This retrospective study included 19 patients (15 men and 4 women, mean age 59.2 years, range 23–81 years) diagnosed with HNC between 2005 and 2011. Of 19 patients, 15 (79 %) had stage III–IV. All patients underwent FDG PET/CT before treatment. Metabolic indexes of primary tumour, including metabolic tumour volume (MTV), maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV_max, SUV_mean) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were considered. Partial volume effect correction (PVC) was performed for SUV_mean and TLG estimation. Correlations between PET/CT parameters and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed. Median patient follow-up was 19.2 months (range 4–24 months).

Results

MTV, TLG and PVC-TLG predicting patients’ outcome with respect to all the considered local and distant disease control endpoints (LRFS, DMFS and DFS) were 32.4 cc, 469.8 g and 547.3 g, respectively. SUV_mean and PVC-SUV_mean cut-off values predictive of LRFS and DFS were 10.8 and 13.3, respectively. PVC was able to compensate errors up to 25 % in the primary HNC tumour uptake. Moreover, PVC enhanced the statistical significance of the results.

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT uptake parameters are predictors of patients’ outcome and can potentially identify patients with higher risk of treatment failure that could benefit from more aggressive approaches. Application of PVC is recommended for accurate measurement of PET parameters.     

18F-FDG符合线路显像检测甲状腺癌转移灶的价值

目的　比较18F 脱氧葡萄糖 (FDG)双探头符合线路SPECT(DHCI)与PET显像检测甲状腺癌转移病灶的价值。方法　 2 6例甲状腺癌患者在同 1天分别进行了18F FDGPET和18F FDGDHCI显像 ,患者均已行甲状腺切除术和131I治疗。肿瘤转移病灶大小由计算机自动勾边在PET显像图中测定。结果　 2 6例甲状腺癌患者中 ,18F FDGPET共发现 12 6个肿瘤转移病灶 ,其中18F FDGDHCI检测到 92个 (73 % ) ,CT发现 76个 (6 0 % ) ,18F FDGDHCI的病灶检测率明显高于CT(P <0 0 5 )。根据病灶部位分析 ,18F FDGDHCI与PET对转移病灶检测的符合率在头颈部为 6 8% ,胸部为 83% ,而在骨转移病灶的符合率仅为 5 2 % (P <0 0 1)。根据病灶大小分析 ,当肿瘤转移病灶大于 1 5cm时 ,18F FDGDHCI与PET结果的一致率达 98% ;而在 1～ 1 5cm的病灶检测中 ,18F FDGDHCI仅能发现 5 6 % ;当病灶小于 1cm时 ,18F FDGDHCI则难以发现 ,而PET发现的病灶最小直径为 0 7cm。结论　当肿瘤转移病灶的直径大于 1 5cm时 ,18F FDGDHCI与PET具有相似的诊断准确性。     

FDG PET在肝脏恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用

目的　评价PET诊断恶性肝肿瘤的价值及其局限性。方法　肝内良性占位病变患者10例 ,其中肝囊肿 6例 ,肝血管瘤 4例 ;肝内恶性病变患者 2 8例 ,其中肝细胞肝癌 (HCC) 13例 ,胆管细胞癌 (CCC) 1例 ,转移性肝癌 14例。按体重注入 5 .5 5MBq/kg18F 脱氧葡萄糖 (FDG) ,使用SiemensE CATEXACTHR+ PET仪采集和重建图像。根据FDG摄取将病灶分为 3种类型 ,A型 :病变部位摄取高于周围正常组织 ;B型 :与周围组织相近 ;C型 :低于周围组织或无摄取。结果　 9例HCC和 1例CCC为A型 ,标准摄取值 (SUV)为 3 0 2± 1 33。 3例HCC为B型 ,1例为C型。 14例转移性肝癌PET共发现转移灶 19个。结论　FDGPET可对肝内病灶进行定位、定性及转移的早期诊断 ,但应警惕HCC显像的特殊性 ,以免误诊或漏诊。     

Staging of untreated squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa with 18F-FDG PET: comparison with head and neck CT/MRI and histopathology.

This prospective, nonrandomized, case-control study evaluated the impact of (18)F-FDG PET in staging untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa (BSCC) and compared the results with CT/MRI and histopathology. METHODS: Between January 2002 and April 2004, 102 untreated BSCC patients with cM0 (no evidence of distant metastatic focus on chest radiograph, liver ultrasonograph, and bone scan) were enrolled with either conventional work-up (CWU, n = 51) or PET (CWU+PET, n = 51). All were monitored for at least 6 mo. The comparative diagnostic efficacies of PET and CT/MRI were evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). The primary endpoint was the percentage reduction in futile surgery (preoperative detection of distant metastatic lesions). The secondary endpoint was the 2-y cumulative recurrence rate among study participants (with PET) compared with that of comparable control subjects (without PET). RESULTS: Significant benefits of PET compared with those of CT/MRI for BSCC patients were in the detection of locoregional (AUC, 0.973 vs. 0.928; P = 0.026), regional (AUC, 0.939 vs. 0.837; P = 0.026), and level II (AUC, 0.974 vs. 0.717; P = 0.02) lymph nodes. Two percent (1/51) of the patients experienced a reduction in futile surgery in the CWU+PET group compared with 0% (0/51) in the CWU group. However, no statistical difference was found in the 2-y locoregional control rate between the CWU and the CWU+PET groups. CONCLUSION: The role of (18)F-FDG PET for BSCC with cM0 is limited. Although PET is superior to CT/MRI in identifying cervical nodal metastases, it does not improve locoregional recurrence.     

18F-FDG PET在头颈部癌治疗后复发中的应用

目的 探讨＾１８Ｆ－脱氧葡萄糖（ＦＤＧ）ＰＥＴ显像用于头颈部癌治疗后复发的价值。方法 ３８例头颈部癌患者,放疗或手术３个月－３ａ,临床怀疑复发。均行＾１８Ｆ－ＦＤＧＰＥＴ显像,其中２８例行ＣＴ检查,ＰＥＴ图像分析采用目测法与半定量分析法,将肿瘤区＾１８Ｆ－ＦＤＧ摄取分为４级,０级;无摄取;Ｉ级,轻度摄取,Ⅱ级：中度摄取,Ⅲ级;重度摄取。最后诊断依靠病理检查及临床随访,结果 以肿瘤区＾１８Ｆ－ＦＤＧ     

Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using 11C-choline PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the feasibility of 11C-choline PET, compared with 18F-FDG PET, for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A total of 16 HCC lesions in 12 patients were examined with both 11C-choline PET and 18F-FDG PET. Tumor lesions were identified as areas of focally increased uptake, exceeding that of surrounding noncancerous liver tissue. For semiquantitative analysis, the tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratio was calculated by dividing the maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) in HCC lesions by the mean SUV in noncancerous liver tissue. RESULTS: 11C-choline PET showed a slightly higher detection rate than did 18F-FDG PET for detection of HCC (63% vs. 50%, respectively), although this difference was not statistically significant. 11C-choline PET had a better detection rate for moderately differentiated HCC lesions but not for those poorly differentiated (75% vs. 25%, respectively). In contrast, 18F-FDG PET exhibited the opposite behavior, with corresponding detection rates of 42% and 75%, respectively. The mean 11C-choline SUV and T/L ratio in moderately differentiated HCC lesions were higher than those in poorly differentiated HCC lesions. In contrast, the mean 18F-FDG SUV and T/L ratio in poorly differentiated HCC were higher than those in moderately differentiated HCC. These differences, however, were also not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: 11C-choline PET had a better detection rate for moderately differentiated HCC lesions but not for poorly differentiated HCC lesions, whereas 18F-FDG PET produced the opposite result. 11C-choline is a potential tracer to complement 18F-FDG in detection of HCC lesions.     

Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and neck tumours: 18F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT

Purpose

Our objectives were to assess the quality of PET images and coregistered anatomic images obtained with PET/MR, to evaluate the detection of focal uptake and SUV, and to compare these findings with those of PET/CT in patients with head and neck tumours.

Methods

The study group comprised 32 consecutive patients with malignant head and neck tumours who underwent whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR and PET/CT. PET images were reconstructed using the attenuation correction sequence for PET/MR and CT for PET/CT. Two experienced observers evaluated the anonymized data. They evaluated image and fusion quality, lesion conspicuity, anatomic location, number and size of categorized (benign versus assumed malignant) lesions with focal uptake. Region of interest (ROI) analysis was performed to determine SUVs of lesions and organs for both modalities. Statistical analysis considered data clustering due to multiple lesions per patient.

Results

PET/MR coregistration and image fusion was feasible in all patients. The analysis included 66 malignant lesions (tumours, metastatic lymph nodes and distant metastases), 136 benign lesions and 470 organ ROIs. There was no statistically significant difference between PET/MR and PET/CT regarding rating scores for image quality, fusion quality, lesion conspicuity or anatomic location, number of detected lesions and number of patients with and without malignant lesions. A high correlation was observed for SUV_mean and SUV_max measured on PET/MR and PET/CT for malignant lesions, benign lesions and organs (ρ?=?0.787 to 0.877, p?<?0.001). SUV_mean and SUV_max measured on PET/MR were significantly lower than on PET/CT for malignant tumours, metastatic neck nodes, benign lesions, bone marrow, and liver (p?<?0.05). The main factor affecting the difference between SUVs in malignant lesions was tumour size (p?<?0.01).

Conclusion

In patients with head and neck tumours, PET/MR showed equivalent performance to PET/CT in terms of qualitative results. Comparison of SUVs revealed an excellent correlation for measurements on both modalities, but underestimation of SUVs measured on PET/MR as compared to PET/CT.     

11C-methionine PET as a prognostic marker in patients with glioma: comparison with 18F-FDG PET

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the prognostic value of ¹¹C-methionine (MET) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in glioma patients.Methods The study population comprised 47 patients with gliomas (19 glioblastoma, 28 others). Pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging, MET PET and FDG PET were performed within a time interval of 2 weeks in all patients. The uptake ratio and standard uptake values were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to determine significant prognostic factors. Ki-67 index was measured by immunohistochemical staining, and compared with FDG and MET uptake in glioma.Results Among the several clinicopathological prognostic factors, tumour pathology (glioblastoma or not), age (60 or <60 years), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (70 or <70) and MET PET (higher uptake or not compared with normal cortex) were found to be significant predictors by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, tumour pathology, KPS and MET PET were identified as significant independent predictors. The Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly correlated with MET uptake (r=0.64), but not with FDG uptake.Conclusion Compared with FDG PET in glioma, MET PET was an independent significant prognostic factor and MET uptake was correlated with cellular proliferation. MET PET may be a useful biological prognostic marker in glioma patients.     

18F-FET与18F-FDG PET显像对照研究

目的探讨O（2-[^18F]氟代乙基）-L-酪氨酸（^18F—FET）对肿瘤的探测能力。方法2例脑瘤患者，用于了解^18F—FETPET显像的全身分布情况。经病理检查或手术证实的其他部位肿瘤患者12例（肺癌6例，胰腺癌、神经内分泌肿瘤各2例，肾上腺皮质癌、鼻咽癌各1例），均有近期CT检查，少数行MRI或全身骨显像检查，1周内分别行^18F—FET与^18F-脱氧萄萄糖（FDG）PET显像。结果①^18F—FET主要经泌尿及胆道系统排泄，骨骼、软组织及心、肝等仅轻度摄取，标准摄取值（SUV）0．38—1．64，肠道、胰腺基本不显影。②12例肿瘤患者^18F—FDGPET显像共检出110个病灶，^18F—FET仅检出15个，病灶的SUV也明显低于^18F—FDG。^18F—FET不仅对一些^18F—FDG代谢活性高的孤立病灶显示不清，对小病灶的检出率也明显低于^18F—FDG。结论^18F—FETPET显像对肺癌、胰腺癌、肾上腺皮质癌等的探测能力明显低于^18F—FDG。     

Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the neck after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional advanced head and neck cancer.

For patients with locoregional advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a widely accepted treatment, but the need for subsequent neck dissection remains controversial. We investigated the clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in this setting. METHODS: In this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA)-compliant retrospective study, we reviewed the records of patients with HNSCC who were treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy between March 2002 and December 2004. Patients with lymph node metastases who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT > or = 8 wk after the end of therapy were included. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were validated by biopsy, histopathology of neck dissection specimens (n = 18), or clinical and imaging follow-up (median, 37 mo). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with a total of 84 heminecks could be evaluated. 18F-FDG PET/CT (visual analysis) detected residual nodal disease with a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%, and an accuracy of 88%. Twenty-nine heminecks contained residual enlarged lymph nodes (diameter, > or =1.0 cm), but viable tumor was found in only 5 of them. 18F-FDG PET/CT was true-positive in 4 and false-positive in 6 heminecks, but the NPV was high at 94%. Fifty-five heminecks contained no residual enlarged nodes, and PET/CT was true-negative in 50 of these, yielding a specificity of 96% and an NPV of 98%. Lack of residual lymphadenopathy on CT had an NPV of 96%. Finally, normal 18F-FDG PET/CT excluded residual disease at the primary site with a specificity of 95%, an NPV of 97%, and an accuracy of 92%. CONCLUSION: In patients with HNSCC, normal 18F-FDG PET/CT after chemoradiotherapy has a high NPV and specificity for excluding residual locoregional disease. In patients without residual lymphadenopathy, neck dissection may be withheld safely. In patients with residual lymphadenopathy, a lack of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in these nodes also excludes viable tumor with high certainty, but confirmation of these data in a prospective study may be necessary before negative 18F-FDG PET/CT may become the only, or at least most-decisive, criterion in the management of the neck after chemoradiotherapy.     

The usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/MRI fusion image in diagnosing pancreatic tumor: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose

This study aimed at demonstrating the feasibility of retrospectively fused ¹⁸F FDG-PET and MRI (PET/MRI fusion image) in diagnosing pancreatic tumor, in particular differentiating malignant tumor from benign lesions. In addition, we evaluated additional findings characterizing pancreatic lesions by FDG-PET/MRI fusion image.

Methods

We analyzed retrospectively 119 patients: 96 cancers and 23 benign lesions. FDG-PET/MRI fusion images (PET/T1 WI or PET/T2WI) were made by dedicated software using 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI image and FDG-PET images. These images were interpreted by two well-trained radiologists without knowledge of clinical information and compared with FDG-PET/CT images. We compared the differential diagnostic capability between PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI fusion image. In addition, we evaluated additional findings such as tumor structure and tumor invasion.

Results

FDG-PET/MRI fusion image significantly improved accuracy compared with that of PET/CT (96.6 vs. 86.6 %). As additional finding, dilatation of main pancreatic duct was noted in 65.9 % of solid types and in 22.6 % of cystic types, on PET/MRI-T2 fusion image. Similarly, encasement of adjacent vessels was noted in 43.1 % of solid types and in 6.5 % of cystic types. Particularly in cystic types, intra-tumor structures such as mural nodule (35.4 %) or intra-cystic septum (74.2 %) were detected additionally. Besides, PET/MRI-T2 fusion image could detect extra benign cystic lesions (9.1 % in solid type and 9.7 % in cystic type) that were not noted by PET/CT.

Conclusions

In diagnosing pancreatic lesions, FDG-PET/MRI fusion image was useful in differentiating pancreatic cancer from benign lesions. Furthermore, it was helpful in evaluating relationship between lesions and surrounding tissues as well as in detecting extra benign cysts.