HLA-C antibodies are associated with irreversible rejection in kidney transplantation: Shared molecular eplets characterization

We report an interesting case concerning an irreversible antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), associated with anti-HLA-C DSA, which occurred after a second kidney transplantation despite having determined a low number of antibodies directed against HLA-C antigens (MFI < 1000) in the previous transplantation (which was then considered to be an indicator of low risk of AMR). A 63-year-old woman was re-transplanted with pre-transplant (PrT) sensitization. On day 7 post-transplantation, oligoanuria occurred and increased MFIs for the detected PrT antibodies and other antibodies (non-detected or detected with very low PrT MFI) were observed. SAB assay also showed antibodies against the second donor HLA-C mismatches and other HLA-C antigens. Nephrologists suspected AMR and the patient was therefore treated with methylprednisolone/plasmapheresis/IVIG/anti-CD20 without improvement, which led to transplantectomy. Histologic analysis confirmed acute AMR. Interestingly, it was possible to define exactly the potential immunizing epitopes whose recognition determines the specific antibody production. So, 1st donor DSAs (detected PrT with low MFI), 2nd donor DSAs (detected PTP), and non-DSA detected PTP have several shared eplets, being the 11AVR eplet the only one present on all alleles. Thus, the recognition of 11AVR eplet in the first transplant modeled the patient’s antibody response. Therefore, we propose that donor HLA-C typing should always be performed for recipients with anti-HLA-C antibodies, and specific shared-eplets should be investigated in order to determine previous transplant mismatches.     

Increased access to transplantation of highly sensitized patients under the new kidney allocation system. A single center experience

We aimed to investigate the impact of the new kidney allocation system (KAS) on the rate of transplantation of sensitized patients at our center. Pre-KAS and post-KAS intervals were Jan 1st to Dec 3rd 2014 and Jan 1st 2015 to Dec 3rd 2015, respectively. The number of deceased-donor crossmatches performed by flow cytometry increased from 715 pre-KAS to 1188 post-KAS. The percent of crossmatches performed for sensitized patients with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) > 0% increased from 19% pre-KAS to 26% post-KAS (p < 0.0001). The number of deceased-donor kidney transplants performed at our center increased from 115 pre-KAS to 125 post-KAS (9% increase). There was a significant increase in the percentage of deceased-donor kidney transplants received by sensitized candidates (from 14% to 26% pre- and post-KAS, respectively; p < 0.0001). The highest increase was seen in the patients with cPRA > 98%, from 0% to 9%, followed by the group with cPRA 50–79%, from 5% to 8%. This increase was balanced by a decrease of 12% in the percentage of non-sensitized recipients, and a modest decrease of 1% in the group with cPRA 1–49%. In conclusion, transplant rate has increased in sensitized patients after KAS. The highest increase was observed among highly sensitized patients (cPRA > 98%).     

Calculated panel reactive antibody with decimals: A refined metric of access to transplantation for highly sensitized candidates

The use of the calculated panel reactive antibody (CPRA) value and the implementation of allocation points for sensitized candidates by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) have improved access to kidney transplantation for highly sensitized candidates (98% CPRA and above). Despite this, a large population of highly sensitized candidates remain awaiting transplantation. To better define this population, we propose the use of two refinements of the standard UNOS CPRA, the CPRA with decimals or CPRAd, and the likelihood of a compatible donor (LCD). These refined metrics of the standard UNOS CPRA will allow transplant programs to describe their patients’ access to transplantation with increased granularity and will help in decisions regarding the use of desensitization.     

Predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes presented by HLA-DR correlate with the de novo development of donor-specific HLA IgG antibodies after kidney transplantation

Background

HLA class-I mismatches selectively induce antibody formation after kidney transplantation. The de novo development of donor-specific IgG HLA class-I antibodies may be dependent on the HLA class-II background of the patient by presenting T-helper epitopes within the recognized HLA class-I antigens.

Methods

The correlation between antibody production against mismatched donor human leukocyte antigens (HLA) class I and the number of HLA class II-restricted predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE-II) in the respective HLA class-I mismatches was investigated. To this end, we analyzed sera taken after nephrectomy from a cohort of 21 non-immunized individuals that received a renal transplant.

Results

Fourty-nine HLA class-I mismatches were found which all contained immunogenic eplets according to HLAMatchmaker. Donor specific HLA antibody responses were detected against 38 HLA class-I mismatches after nephrectomy. These mismatches were found to contain a larger number of PIRCHE-II when compared to mismatches which did not induce donor specific HLA antibodies. Most PIRCHE-II (68%) were not part of an eplet as defined by HLAMatchmaker.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that presentation of donor-derived HLA class-I peptides by recipient HLA class-II molecules plays a significant role in de novo development of donor-specific IgG HLA antibodies.     

Anti-HLA-A, -B, -DR, -DQB1 and -DQA1 antibodies reactive epitope determination with HLAMatchmaker in multipare awaiting list for heart transplant

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies represent a significant risk factor for transplant failure.     

Significant IgG subclass heterogeneity in HLA-specific antibodies: Implications for pathogenicity,prognosis, and the rejection response

IgG subclasses differ in their ability to fix complement and bind Fc receptors. This study describes a detailed analysis of the distribution of HLA-specific IgG subclasses in order to define how this varies in sensitised waiting-list patients. We found significant variation in the level, presence and combinations of each HLA-specific IgG subclass between and within individuals and this is influenced by the type of sensitising event. Graft failure in particular provokes higher levels of IgG1 (vs transfusion, p = 0.071 and pregnancy, p = 0.042), IgG2 (vs transfusion, p = 0.001 and pregnancy, p = 0.016), and IgG4 (vs transfusion, p = 0.052). Both graft failure and pregnancy tend to stimulate multiple IgG subclass responses against HLA, whereas transfusion stimulated antibodies are dominated by responses limited to IgG1 (p = 0.033) and have a low incidence of IgG4 (p = 0.046). In marked contrast, IgG4 characterised nearly all HLA DQ-specific antibodies stimulated by graft rejection (p = 0.006). Such widely varying IgG subclass heterogeneity is likely to be due to underlying immunological processes dependent on the route of sensitisation. This diversity, which implies functional variation, may help explain why HLA-specific antibodies are an obstacle to transplantation in some circumstances but not others. The subclass association with rejection has potential as a biomarker for chronic rejection.     

Understanding solid-phase HLA antibody assays and the value of MFI

As the practice of medicine becomes more reliant on imaging and laboratory tests, medical decisions will be increasingly based on numbers. Accordingly, following the introduction of solid-phase testing to the HLA testing repertoire, laboratory directors and physicians have employed preset mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) thresholds as the basis for decisions in the management of transplant patients. However, what do MFI values mean? The literature is rife with reports detailing numerous factors that influence antibody assessment including (but not limited to) sensitization history of the patient, level of mismatch between donor and recipient, presence of interfering substances in the serum, whether the antigen on multiplex beads is native or denatured, day-to-day and technologist variability, and the historical performance of an assay in a given institution. How are these variables incorporated into the interpretation of MFI values? Herein, the pitfalls and complexities of single antigen bead (SAB) testing and interpretation are discussed with specific attention to what can and cannot be inferred by MFI.     

Early acute antibody-mediated rejection of a negative flow crossmatch 3rd kidney transplant with exclusive disparity at HLA-DP

Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) to HLA-DP may cause antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), especially in re-transplants. We describe the immunization history of a patient who received 3 kidney transplants; the 3rd kidney was completely matched except at DPA1 and DPB1. Prior to the 3rd transplant, single antigen bead analysis (SAB) showed DSA reactivity against DPA1 shared by the 1st and 3rd donors, but B and T flow crossmatch (FXM) results were negative. Within 11 days the 3rd transplant underwent acute C4d+ AMR which coincided with the presence of complement (C1q)-binding IgG1 DSA against donor DPA1 and DPB1. Using HLAMatchmaker and SAB, we provide evidence that eplet (epitope) spreading on DPA1 and eplet sharing on differing DPB1 alleles of the 1st and 3rd transplants was associated with AMR. Since weak DSA to DPA1/DPB1 may induce acute AMR with negative FXM, donor DPA1/DPB1 high resolution typing should be considered in sensitized patients with DP-directed DSA.     

Root cause analysis of limitations of virtual crossmatch for kidney allocation to highly-sensitized patients

Efficient allocation of deceased donor organs depends upon effective prediction of immunologic compatibility based on donor HLA genotype and recipient alloantibody profile, referred to as virtual crossmatching (VCXM). VCXM has demonstrated utility in predicting compatibility, though there is reduced efficacy for patients highly sensitized against allogeneic HLA antigens. The recently revised deceased donor kidney allocation system (KAS) has increased transplantation for this group, but with an increased burden for histocompatibility testing and organ sharing. Given the limitations of VCXM, we hypothesized that increased organ offers for highly-sensitized patients could result in a concomitant increase in offers rejected due to unexpectedly positive crossmatch. Review of 645 crossmatches performed for deceased donor kidney transplantation at our center did not reveal a significant increase in positive crossmatches following KAS implementation. Positive crossmatches not predicted by VCXM were concentrated among highly-sensitized patients. Root cause analysis of VCXM failures identified technical limitations of anti-HLA antibody testing as the most significant contributor to VCXM error. Contributions of technical limitations including additive/synergistic antibody effects, prozone phenomenon, and antigens not represented in standard testing panels, were evaluated by retrospective testing. These data provide insight into the limitations of VCXM, particularly those affecting allocation of kidneys to highly-sensitized patients.     

HLA compatibility assessment and management of highly sensitized patients under the new kidney allocation system (KAS): A 2016 status report from twelve HLA laboratories across the U.S.

Twelve HLA laboratories were surveyed to assess the methods and operational issues involved to define highly sensitized patients and to assess HLA compatibility under the new kidney allocation system (KAS) in the U.S. All laboratories used single antigen bead assays both pre- and post-KAS to define both broad and allele-specific HLA antibodies. The methods and threshold used to list HLA unacceptable antigens in UNet for virtual crossmatch (vXM) and the criteria used for determining HLA compatibility varied among laboratories. Laboratories reported several limitations of the current assays including the accuracy of quantifiable antibody fluorescence values, inadequate coverage of common alleles on the bead panels, and challenges in calibrating the vXM. The new KAS has resulted in a significant surge of deceased donor organ offers requiring vXM evaluation under tight time constraints. In the post-KAS period, eight of twelve laboratories (67%) indicated that their center did not proceed to transplant based on vXM without a prospective lymphocyte crossmatch. In conclusion, HLA laboratories play a critical role in deceased donor allocation for highly sensitized patients under the new KAS. Significant opportunities exist to improve the methods used in the assessment of HLA compatibility to safely transplant highly sensitized patients.     

The ABCs (DRDQDPs) of the prozone effect in single antigen bead HLA antibody testing: Lessons from our highly sensitized patients

Accurate identification of HLA antibodies using the single antigen bead (SAB) assay is critical for assessment of pre/post-transplant immunological risk and successful virtual crossmatching. Unfortunately, high titer HLA antibodies can be missed or underestimated in the SAB assay as a result of interference with the detection of IgG. This so called prozone effect has been attributed to both complement- and IgM-dependent mechanisms and can be minimized with serum dilution or treatment with heat, EDTA, or DTT. In this study we describe the frequency, nature, and degree of prozone in a cohort of highly sensitized patients (cPRA ≥ 95%), in whom accurate detection of HLA antibodies and virtual crossmatching is of paramount importance. Sera were tested by the SAB assay ± EDTA treatment, ±1:10 dilution to identify the prozone effect. The relative contribution of complement vs IgM to prozone was assessed using anti-C3d and anti-IgM reporter antibodies, respectively. We found that prozone was very frequent in highly sensitized patients (80%), especially those with a history of previous transplantation (87%). Class I HLA specificities were more commonly affected than class II and the susceptibility to prozone was locus dependent with HLA-A(31%), -B(29%) and -DQ(26%) being affected more frequently than HLA-DP(17%), -C(16%) and -DR(5%) antigens. Interestingly, the presence of prozone could be predicted by C3d positivity (MFI ≥ 4000; sensitivity = 95.2%, specificity = 97.2%) and the degree of prozone correlated directly with the extent of C3d deposition. The role of IgM was less clear. However, serum dilution studies suggested that IgM may contribute to interference in a small subset of prozone positive specificities. Our study underscores the importance of serum treatment to inhibit complement activation and minimize prozone in the SAB assay, especially in highly sensitized patients.     

New priorities: Analysis of the New Kidney Allocation System on UCLA patients transplanted from the deceased donor waitlist

UNOS implemented a new Kidney Allocation System (New KAS) on December 4, 2014 with a primary goal of increasing equity to organ transplant for patients that were immunologically or socially disadvantaged by the previous allocation system (Previous KAS) that prioritized long wait times. We examined the effects of the New KAS on patients transplanted from the UCLA deceased donor waitlist during the first year and compared to the last year of the Previous KAS. The total number of deceased donor kidney transplants was increased in the New KAS as compared to the Previous KAS (178 vs 148). Transplant of regraft patients and of highly sensitized patients with cPRA ? 99% was significantly increased in the New KAS (New KAS vs Previous KAS, 29.8% vs 11.5%, p ? 0.0001, and 26.4% vs 2.7%, p ? 0.0001, respectively). In the New KAS, the percentage of patient’s receiving allografts imported from outside our local area was also significantly increased (34.8% vs 15.5%, p < 0.0001). In the New KAS, 59.7% and 48.3% of imported organs were allocated to very highly sensitized (?99% cPRA) or re-graft patients, respectively, as compared to 8.7% and 8.7% during the Previous KAS (p < 0.001). Recipients and donors with age differences exceeding 15 years were decreased in the New KAS as compared to the Previous KAS (36.5 vs 48.7%, p?0.032). There was a 40.1% reduction in transplant to patients in the 65+ age group in the New KAS (p ? 0.025). The percentage of patients transplanted with preformed donor specific antibody (DSA) was similar in the New as compared to the Previous KAS (19.7% vs 15.5%) and, patients were transplanted with a range of 1–3 preformed DSA of weak to moderate strength. Cold ischemic time was significantly increased over all organs, and in patients transplanted with preformed DSA during the New as compared to the Previous KAS (17.5 vs 19.1 h and 17.2 vs 22.2, p < 0.04 and p < 0.03, respectively). Episodes of delayed graft function and the number of biopsies for cause were similar between the New and the Previous KAS. However, there were more events of biopsy proven antibody mediated rejection in patients transplanted since the start of the New KAS. The data show that the New KAS is working at the center level as designed to better age match recipients and donors and to increase transplantation of very highly sensitized patients through broader sharing.     

Cutoff values and data handling for solid-phase testing for antibodies to HLA: effects on listing unacceptable antigens for thoracic organ transplantation

Application of single-antigen solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) in virtual crossmatch-based organ allocation has been hindered by continued debate over the biologic relevance of detected antibodies and the relationship between cutoff mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values with crossmatch testing results. To define SPI parameters accurately predicting crossmatch testing, we analyzed a series of anti-HLA antibodies from highly-sensitized patients awaiting lung or heart transplantation. Serial dilution of serum for SPI and cytotoxic crossmatch (CXM) enabled comparison over a wide spectrum of antibody "strengths". Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified predictive cutoff values for HLA Class I and DR-specific antibodies. However, antibodies to HLA-DQ antigens demonstrated a significantly different characteristic, highlighting difficulties in interpretation of clinical significance. We also quantitatively characterized two data handling methods, MFI ratio (MR) and relative ratio (RR), to examine their potential impact on identifying unacceptable antigens. In combination with user defined cutoff values, MFI, MR and RR lead to discordant identification of antibodies. Establishment of cutoff values for MR and RR that are comparable to MFI demonstrated increased consistency in antibody identification. This single laboratory experience is an example of establishing statistically robust cutoff values and validation across different data handling methods for use of SPI in virtual crossmatch.     

Endothelial molecules decipher the mechanisms and functional pathways in antibody-mediated rejection

Microvascular endothelium is the main target of injury in antibody-mediated rejection of human organ transplants. Hence, antibody-mediated rejection histologically presents with microvascular inflammation (pulmonary or myocardial or peritubular capillaritis, glomerulitis), thrombosis, and endothelial remodeling (duplication and/or multilayering of glomerular and capillary basement membranes). We previously observed upregulation of several endothelial genes in kidney transplant biopsies from patients with donor specific antibodies, indicating active antibody-mediated rejection and poor graft survival. Furthermore, endothelial molecular signals discovered a previously unknown clinical phenotype: C4d negative antibody-mediated rejection. With the recognition of C4d negative antibody-mediated rejection, data from multiple transplant centers now show that antibody-mediated rejection is the most common cause of late kidney transplant failure. This paper reviews the current understanding of endothelial cell biology in antibody-mediated rejection, emphasizing recent advances and pending questions. Furthermore, the paper discusses functionally active pathways in human antibody-mediated rejection, which include aspects of endothelial activation with increased endothelial adhesive and pro-coagulant signals facilitating leukocyte trafficking and attachment, cell-to-basement membrane interactions, platelet activation, coagulation, and endothelial repair responses. To understand effector mechanisms of antibody-mediated rejection and quantify the degree of antibody-mediated tissue injury in clinical transplants, endothelial cells provide a useful read-out.     

Frequent development of subclinical chronic antibody-mediated rejection within 1 year after renal transplantation with pre-transplant positive donor-specific antibodies and negative CDC crossmatches

Although short-term graft survival has been improved by recent desensitization protocols including B cell depletion therapy, little is known about risk factors of chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) in HLA-incompatible (HLA-I) renal transplantation (RTx). Twenty-six HLA-I RTx with positive donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and negative T cell cytotoxic crossmatches were compared with 88 ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) and 207 ABO-identical/compatible (ABO-Id/C) RTx. The desensitization therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab and double-filtration plasmapheresis. Protocol biopsies within 1 year revealed subclinical CAMR in 36% of HLA-I, 5% of ABO-I and 3% of ABO-Id/C, although clinical acute AMR was observed in 8%, 3% and 1%, respectively. The incidence of CAMR was not different between class I and class II DSA. Most of class I DSA (94%) changed to negative 1 year after RTx, whereas 77% of class II DSA remained positive. In addition, the remaining DRB ± DQB DSA caused CAMR in 80% of patients, while DQB DSA alone did not. The progress of subclinical CAMR within 1 year could not be circumvented by rituximab. Sustained class II (DRB ± DQB) DSA detection after RTx may pose a potential risk for developing CAMR, but negative change in class I DSA could also elicit CAMR.     

Inter and intra laboratory concordance of HLA antibody results obtained by single antigen bead based assay

Single antigen bead based assays (SAB) to identify antibodies to HLA are marketed as a qualitative test, however often used as a quantitative test as the results provide mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) which is found to correlate with the strength/avidity of the antibody. We studied the between and within laboratory variability in performing the SAB from one manufacturer. Ten samples were tested at four laboratories according to the manufacturer’s suggested protocol. Additionally same samples were tested on four consecutive days in one laboratory. All tests were performed using the same lot of beads and secondary antibody. Results were classified as positive at four different MFI cutoffs: 1000, 5000, 8000 and 10,000. MFI values across and within the laboratory were compared in a pair-wise fashion with Pearson’s correlations. Overall concordance for Class-I was 97% between laboratories and 98% within laboratory at all cutoffs. Pair-wise Pearson correlation between laboratories was 0.989–0.99, while within laboratory it was 0.998–0.999. For Class-II, overall concordance between and within laboratory was 98%. Pair-wise Pearson correlation between laboratories was 0.991–0.997, while within laboratory it was 0.997–0.999. There is good correlation between laboratories and within laboratory using the same manufacturer, same lot and same protocol while performing SAB.     

(F)Utility of the physical crossmatch for living donor evaluations in the age of the virtual crossmatch

Flow cytometric crossmatches (FCXM) are routinely performed to support living-donor renal transplantation. While long a laboratory mainstay, a physical crossmatch is costly, time consuming, and frequently poses interpretative conundrums with both false-positive and false- negative results. Given the increased utilization of the virtual crossmatch (vXM) in the deceased donor setting, our aim was to assess its utility in living donor evaluations. We reviewed 100 living donor FCXMs and retrospectively performed a vXM for each pair. Seventy-five (75) cases were concordant, (i.e., FCXM?/vXM? or FCXM+/vXM+) while 25 cases were discordant; Five were vXM+/FCXM? and 20 were FCXM+/vXM?. Since donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were not detected in the 20 FCXM+/vXM? cases, these were interpreted as false-positive, i.e., due to non-HLA antibodies. Importantly, none of these patients, when transplanted across a positive FCXM, experienced early antibody mediated rejection or subsequently developed HLA DSA. These data reveal that, for the vast majority of living donor evaluations, a vXM is an acceptable vetting procedure.     

Identification of patients with increased immunological risk among potential kidney recipients in the Polish population

Pretransplant identification of allosensitized patients is possible thanks to new technologies, which allow for accurate detection of clinically relevant alloantibodies. Implementation of these methods in the screening of patients awaiting transplantation increased their chance for successful donor–recipient matching.     

Use of complement binding assays to assess the efficacy of antibody mediated rejection therapy and prediction of graft survival in kidney transplantation

Background

The Luminex® single antigen bead assay (SAB) is the method of choice for monitoring the treatment for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). A ?50% reduction of the dominant donor-specific antibody (IgG-DSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) has been associated with improved kidney allograft survival, and C1q-fixing DSA activity is associated with poor outcomes in patients with AMR. We aimed to investigate if C1q-DSA can be used as a reliable predictor of response to therapy and allograft survival in patients with biopsy-proven AMR.

Correlations between donor-specific antibodies and non-adherence with chronic active antibody-mediated rejection phenotypes and their impact on kidney graft survival

Chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (CAABMR) is associated with poor kidney graft survival and has no clear effective treatment. Forty-one cases of CAABMR were detected in indication graft biopsies and evaluated according to current Banff classification. We investigated the impact of concurrent donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and their characteristics, together with non-adherence regarding immunosuppression on CAABMR histopathological phenotypes and prognosis. Twenty-four (59%) patients had detectable DSA at biopsy, with 15 of them being considered non-adherent. Graft function at biopsy was similar in DSA (+) and (?) patients. DSA (+) patients had significantly higher tubulointerstitial inflammation (i and ti) and acute humoral (g+ptc+v+C4d) composite score than DSA (?). DSA (+)/non-adherent cases presented additionally with increased microvascular inflammation (ptc and v), besides having a distinctively lower ah score. C1q DSA strength was higher (P?=?.046) in non-adherent patients and correlated closely with C4d score (P?=?.002). Lower graft function and ah score, higher proteinuria and ci?+?ct score, and, separately per each model, DSA (+) (HR?=?2.446, P?=?.034), DSA (+)/non-adherent (HR?=?3.657, P?=?.005) and DSA (+)/C1q (+) (HR?=?4.831, P?=?.003) status were independent predictors of graft failure. CAABMR with concomitant DSA pose a higher risk of graft failure. Adherence should be evaluated, and histopathological phenotyping and DSA characterization may add critical information.