A comparison of the onset of action of salbutamol and formoterol in reversing methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

This single-centre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy four-way cross-over study in 24 moderately severe asthmatic patients compared the speed of onset of recommended doses of salbutamol (200 micrograms) and formoterol (12 micrograms) delivered by metered-dose inhaler in reversing the bronchoconstriction induced by a cumulative dose of methacholine to produce a 20% decrease (PD20) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Specific airway conductance (SGAW) and airway resistance (RAW) were measured in baseline condition, immediately after challenge and 0.5, 1.5, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 min and every hour up to 4 h after inhalation of the trial drug. FEV1 was measured in baseline condition, after challenge and 15, 30 and 60 min and then every 30 min up to 4 h after inhalation of the study drug. The primary efficacy parameter was the change in SGAW. Salbutamol produced a two-fold increase in SGAW within 4 min and a maximum increase after 79.3 min. Formoterol produced a two-fold increase in SGAW after 5 min and a maximum increase after 119.6 min. Changes in SGAW were slightly, but consistently, higher during the first 2 h after inhalation of salbutamol, both in absolute values and as a percentage of the maximum response. Differences were significant at 10, 15 and 30 min time points. There was no significant difference between the maximum values of SGAW after the two drugs. Changes in RAW and FEV1 reflected the differences in SGAW. It was concluded that in methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction both formoterol and salbutamol have a very fast onset of action, achieving prechallenge values of SGAW within 3 min, salbutamol being slightly faster than formoterol.     

A comparison of inhaled budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate in childhood asthma

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effects of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide in asthmatic children using two common ways of administration. Twenty-one children, aged 4-14 years, who regularly used inhaled corticosteroids for their control of asthma were included in the study. The drugs were studied by using a double-blind randomized cross-over design trial with a single-blind placebo period at the end. Each period lasted 3 weeks. The dosage was 100 micrograms b.i.d. for both drugs. Budesonide was administered via a spacer inhaler (Inhalet), and beclomethasone dipropionate via a standard actuator. Compared with placebo, both drugs significantly improved PEFR values for morning (20% for budesonide and 14% for BDP) and evening (14% for budesonide and 9% for BDP). Both morning and/or evening peak flows were significantly higher during the budesonide treatment as compared with the BDP treatment. In comparison with the placebo period, FEV1.0 was significantly improved with budesonide but not with BDP. Plasma cortisol, WBC counts, differential and eosinophilia counts in blood were determined at the beginning and the end of each period. All of the values except for the eosinophil counts were within normal ranges. Candida was looked for but not found in any case. No other adverse effects were registered. For most of the children, a deterioration of the state of their asthma and increased need for concomitant therapy during the placebo period confirmed their steroid dependence. The number of administrations with concomitant anti-asthmatic therapy increased during placebo by 61% as compared with the budesonide therapy, and by 40% compared with the BDP therapy.     

How important is the sequence of administration of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and salbutamol in asthma

Sixty patients with fairly stable asthma of mild or moderate severity entered a multicentre, double-blind cross-over trial, comparing the efficacy of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate preceded 10 minutes earlier by inhalation of salbutamol with that of beclomethasone followed 10 minutes later by salbutamol during two consecutive three-month periods. Patients received beclomethasone 100 μg and salbutamol 200 μg four times daily. Analysis of occurrence of exacerbations, usage of additional inhaled salbutamol, peak expiratory flow rate and symptom scores showed no evidence that regular beclomethasone was more effective when preceded by salbutamol rather than when followed by it.     

Beclometasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol versus fluticasone propionate in children with asthma

Beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) extrafine is a hydrofluoroalkane-based, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free inhalation aerosol. This study was conducted to determine whether BDP extrafine and CFC-fluticasone proprionate (FP) aerosols were equivalent in terms of efficacy and tolerability in children with symptomatic mild-to-moderate asthma. Male and female patients (aged 5-12 yr) with an asthma diagnosis for > or =3 months, peak expiratory flow (PEF) > or =60% of predicted normal and suboptimal asthma control were randomised to double-blind treatment with BDP extrafine 200 microg day(-1) (n=139) or CFC-FP 200 microg day(-1) (n=141) for up to 18 weeks. After 6 and 12 weeks, study medication was 'stepped down' to 100 and 50 microg day(-1), respectively, if patients had achieved good asthma control. Patients with poor asthma control discontinued from the study and those with intermediate control continued in the study but did not undergo a dose reduction. The estimated treatment difference in morning PEF% predicted at 6 weeks was -1.9% (90% CI -4.9, 1.0). There was a trend towards a greater increase in forced vital capacity (% predicted) in the BDP extrafine group (5.3 versus 0.4%; p=0.084). A 'step-down' in therapy to 100 microg day(-1) was possible in 36% and 42% of patients in the BDP extrafine and CFC-FP groups, respectively, at 6 weeks. Both drugs were well tolerated. BDP extrafine and CFC-FP aerosols were equally effective at improving asthma control in children with mild-to-moderate asthma at the same daily dose.     

Treatment of exercise-induced asthma with beclomethasone dipropionate in children with asthma.

A new hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) aerosol markedly increases drug delivery to the airways. Therefore, even low doses of HFA-BDP should be effective, and the present study assesses this. A randomised, double-blind, crossover study was used to compare the effect of placebo, HFA-BDP 50 microg or 100 microg given q.d. (QVAR(TM) Autohaler(TM); 3M Pharmaceuticals, St. Paul, MN, USA) on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). After a 14-day run-in, 25 children (5-14 yrs old) entered three 4-week treatment periods, separated by a 1-week washout. After each period, the fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), after an exercise test, and eNO were measured. Significant treatment effects with no carry-over or period effects were seen for both eNO and maximum fall in FEV1 after exercise. Differences were seen between placebo (fall in FEV1=27.9%; eNO=14.4 parts per billion (ppb)) and either dose of HFA-BDP, but not between the two active doses (50 microg: fall in FEV1=20.8%, eNO=9.3 ppb; 100 microg: fall in FEV1=20.9%, eNO=8.9 ppb). In conclusion, low q.d. doses of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate reduced exhaled nitric oxide and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Further studies are needed to assess whether q.d. administration of beclomethasone dipropionate is as effective as b.i.d. administration.     

Inhaled formoterol during one year in asthma: a comparison with salbutamol.

Eighteen patients, who had previously taken part in a 2 wk cross-over comparison between formoterol and salbutamol, now took part in a one year double-blind study comparing salbutamol 200 micrograms b.i.d. with formoterol 12 micrograms b.i.d. Additional doses were taken when needed and were recorded. Ten patients were started on formoterol and eight on salbutamol. After one month, the patients were allowed to shift to the alternative drug. Two patients withdrew from the study. At the end of the study, 13 of 16 patients were on formoterol, thus showing a long-lasting preference for this drug. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) dose-response curves for inhaled salbutamol were repeatedly recorded during the study, and no tachyphylaxis was found. One patient stopped taking inhaled steroids but continued taking formoterol and theophylline. He deteriorated with a decreased response to salbutamol. After re-introduction of inhaled steroids his condition improved. This case indicates that effective bronchodilator therapy may mask the deterioration of asthma.     

Comparison of formoterol, salbutamol and salmeterol in methacholine-induced severe bronchoconstriction.

The onset of the bronchodilating effect of formoterol (12 microg by Turbuhaler) was compared with that of salbutamol (50 microg by Turbuhaler), salmeterol (50 microg by Diskhaler) and placebo in methacholine-induced severe bronchoconstriction. Seventeen subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma completed this randomized, double blind, cross-over, double-dummy study. On four study days, baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was recorded and the subjects were challenged with methacholine until FEV1 fell by at least 30%. Immediately thereafter, the study drugs were inhaled and lung function was assessed for 60 min. The geometric mean time for FEV1 to return to 85% of baseline was 7.2 min with formoterol, 6.5 min with salbutamol, 14.1 min with salmeterol and 34.7 min with placebo (p=0.0001, overall ANOVA). The difference between formoterol and salmeterol was statistically significant (p=0.01); there was no difference between formoterol and salbutamol (p=0.69). In conclusion, formoterol reversed methacholine-induced severe bronchoconstriction as rapidly as salbutamol and more rapidly than salmeterol. Classifying beta2-agonists as "fast"- and "slow"- acting may be supplemental to "short"- and "long"-acting.     

A placebo-controlled blinded comparison of nedocromil sodium and beclomethasone dipropionate in bronchial asthma

Two hundred and two patients aged 12–78 with chiefly moderate to severe asthma took part in a multicenter randomized blined group comparison of nedocromil sodium (NS) 4 mg four times daily, beclomethasone dipropionate (BD) 0.1 mg four times daily, and placebo. Patients were assessed at the start and end of a two week baseline and after three and six weeks of treatment. Compared with placebo, both NS and BD significantly improved day-time dyspnoea and day and nighttime cough, as assessed by diary card scores. Lung function (FEV₁) was significantly improved in the BD group. In the NS group there was also a significant reduction in concomitant use of inhaledβ ₂-agonists. Overall opinions of efficacy by clinicians and patients were significantly in favor of both active treatments over placebo. There were no significant differences between the three treatments for peak expiratory flow rates, morning tightness or nighttime dyspnoea. Comparison between the two active treatments showed no significant differences in any of the variables.     

Improvement of asthma control with beclomethasone extrafine aerosol compared to fluticasone and budesonide

Qvar Autohaler efficacy on asthma control, assessed with E. Juniper asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), was compared with fluticasone and budesonide. An open randomized study, stratified (2:1) on the intake of long-acting beta2-mimetics (LAbeta2), was performed in patients with moderate to severe poorly controlled asthma (defined by at least one nocturnal discomfort in the last 5 days or a mean of 2 puffs of short-acting beta2-mimetics in the last 7 days or exercise dyspnea) despite treatment with beclomethasone < or = 1000 microg/day (or equivalent). 460 patients received Qvar Autohaler 800 microg/day (n = 149), fluticasone Diskus 1000 microg/day (n = 149) or budesonide Turbuhaler 1600 microg/day (n = 162) during 12 weeks. Asthma control improved in all groups, with no difference between groups. For patients treated with LAbeta2 (n = 286) a significantly greater improvement of the ACQ score was obtained with Qvar Autohaler versus fluticasone (1.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.9; P = 0.019), but not versus budesonide (0.9 +/- 0.9). Pulmonary function test improvements were similar in the 3 groups. The significant improvement in asthma control in patients receiving LAbeta2 suggests potential advantages for extrafine aerosols as part of anti-inflammatory treatment optimization.     

Treatment of steroid-dependent asthma patients with beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol.

Fifty-two steroid-dependent adults with chronic perennial asthma were transferred to beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol. The tests demonstrated a significant improvement with beclomethasone in terms of the diary score, bronchodilator use, and PEF and FEV1.0 measurements, as compared with the previous period of prednisolone treatment. Before the transfer, 26 of the patients displayed one or more diseases or symptoms which were probably due to systemic steroid medication. Morning cortisol levels, along with the response to tetracosactrin had in all cases returned to normal when tests were carried out 41 days after transfer to beclomethasone dipropionate. In a group of 12 patients with the lowest 11-OHCS basal values, the mean of their 11-OHCS values during prednisolone treatment was as low as 0.14 plus or minus 0.06 mumol/l, but tetracosactrin challenge induced an elevation to a normal level, 0.33 plus or minus 0.13 mumol/l. After 41 days of beclomethasone treatment, the corresponding values were 0.56 plus or minus 0.90 plus or minus 0.28 mumol/l. Thirty-seven patients experienced one or more disturbing symptoms after transfer to beclomethasone. In many cases, the symptoms of allergic rhinitis were troublesome and persistent leading to a sixfold increase in the use of antihistaminic tablets. When the patients had learned to exhale through the nose following beclomethasone inhalation, the use of antihistaminic tablets again diminished to some extent. Moreover, two cases of ulcerative colitis were encountered during the beclomethasone treatment. During a follow-up period of one year, 14 patients were again receiving prednisolone; most often, this was due to worsening of the asthma because of respiratory infections. During the beclomethasone treatment, a continuous significant improvement in PEF was noted after isoprenaline inhalation, suggesting that further benefit may be obtained by the employment of bronchodilator aerosols as an essential part of the treatment.     

A comparison of clinical use of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in pediatric asthma

Inhaled steroids play a very important role in the prevention and treatment of asthma. Previous studies indicated that fluticasone propionate (FP) had low bioavailability and high local potency. However, the laboratory data in these studies were not obtained among Taiwan population. It is very important that native data should be established. Thus a 12-week research program was designed, involving 77 patients, 51 for FP group and 26 for beclomethasone dipropionate (BD) group. The objects were victims of moderate to severe asthma and their age ranged from 4 to 14 years old. An open, comparative and randomized method was adopted. Except for the 4-week-later daytime symptom score(P = 0.033, BD group was better), no other significant differences were found between the two groups in the symptom score improvement(P > 0.05). All the P-values for the daytime & night-time scores were lower than 0.001, which means obvious improvement after treatment in both groups. P-value for PEF improvement was 0.003 after 4 weeks (BD group was better) and 0.943 after 8 weeks; for FEV1 improvement, it was 0.005 after 4 weeks(BD group was better) and 0.252 after 8 weeks; and for FEV1/FVC improvements, it was 0.067 after 4 weeks and 0.097 after 8 weeks. There was no statistic significance in total eosinophil count (TEC), IgE, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) serum level changes after 4 or 8 weeks. Adverse effects were all anticipated and no statistic significance showed up, either, between the two groups or in the cortisol levels (P > 0.05). In conclusion, native data indicated that the potency of 100 micrograms of FP was equal to that of 200 micrograms of BD and that few side effects were noted in FP group. It is recommended that this drug be introduced for clinical use.     

Twice-daily beclomethasone dipropionate in the treatment of childhood asthma

Chronic nonsteroid-dependent childhood asthma was treated by adding beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or placebo (P) to the daily regimen of theophylline (T). Subjects (6-12 years) were selected based on daily control of asthma by T at necessary T levels in sera of 10-20 micrograms. Active BDP (200 micrograms b.i.d.) and P groups were randomly assigned. Each subject's baseline values were evaluated on a 4-week open phase followed by a 10-12 week double-blind phase. Daily diaries were kept for signs, symptoms, Wright peak flow recordings, and medication requirements. Visits were monitored for urine and serum cortisols, pulmonary function tests (PFT), objective changes, and medication compliance. Demographics between both groups were nonsignificant (NS). Baseline PFTs in P group were significantly better than the BDP group. Serum and urine cortisols and ACTH responses were NS (p less than 0.05). Drug efficacy for asthma characteristics was significantly improved in the BDP group (p less than 0.05) only. The BDP group maximized their response by 8 weeks, with improvement of their FEV1 and FEF25-75 PFT. Thus, b.i.d. BDP provided good asthma control and the twice-daily program should insure improved compliance.     

Efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol in childhood asthma: a 12-week,randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has been formulated as an extrafine aerosol (hydrofluoroalkane-134a [HFA]-BDP) [QVAR; 3M Pharmaceuticals; St Paul, MN], which gives improved lung deposition compared with chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-BDP. The clinical efficacy of HFA-BDP has been established in adult asthma at a required dose below that of CFC-BDP, but has not been evaluated in children. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of HFA-BDP in childhood asthma. DESIGN: A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study involving 353 children aged 5 to 12 years with moderate, symptomatic asthma. After a 2-week run-in period, patients were randomized to HFA-BDP, 80 micro g/d (n = 120); HFA-BDP, 160 micro g/d (n = 117); or HFA-placebo (n = 116) administered twice daily. SETTING: Hospital outpatient. RESULTS: HFA-BDP, 80 micro g/d and 160 micro g/d, produced a significant, dose-related increase from baseline in FEV(1) percent predicted compared with placebo. At week 12, mean changes from baseline in FEV(1) percent predicted were 9.2% (p < or = 0.01 vs placebo), 10% (p < or = 0.01 vs placebo), and 3.9% for the HFA-BDP 80 micro g/d, HFA-BDP 160 micro g/d, and placebo groups, respectively. There was also a significant decrease in daily beta-agonist use, improvement in peak expiratory flow, and increase [correction] in the percentage of days free from asthma symptoms (p < or = 0.05 for HFA-BDP, 160 micro g/d, vs placebo at weeks 11 to 12). HFA-BDP was well tolerated, with no significant differences in the incidence or nature of adverse events between HFA-BDP and placebo groups. Neither were there significant differences between groups in mean percentage change from baseline in the morning plasma cortisol level at week 12 or in the percentage of patients with morning plasma cortisol levels below the reference range at baseline and week 12. In a subgroup tested, the percentage of patients with an abnormal response to low-dose adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation at week 12 was low and similar among all groups. CONCLUSIONS: HFA-BDP, 80 to 160 micro g/d, is effective and safe in childhood asthma.     

Dose-related effect of beclomethasone dipropionate on airway responsiveness in asthma

The effects of twice daily inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) at two dose levels (500 and 1,000 micrograms daily) on the airway responsiveness to inhaled histamine was evaluated by a randomized, single-blind, cross-over study in 10 patients with stable asthma. The 12-week study began with a 3-week run-in period of baseline treatment, which was continued unchanged throughout the study, and the two treatment periods were separated by a 3-week placebo period. Patients attended the laboratory every 3 weeks for spirometry and histamine inhalation tests to determine the provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC20 of FEV1). There was a similar significant improvement (p less than 0.05) in mean FEV1 after both treatments. There was no significant change in PC20 after treatment with 500 micrograms daily, the geometric mean being 0.587 mg/ml after the placebo period and 0.860 mg/ml after BDP treatment. There was a significant improvement in PC20 (1.930 mg/ml) after treatment with 1,000 micrograms BDP daily in comparison with the placebo and treatment periods with 500 micrograms BDP daily (p less than 0.001). These results suggest that higher doses than usual of inhaled BDP must be used to control airway responsiveness in asthmatics.     

Tolerability of high cumulative doses of the HFA modulite beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol combination inhaler in asthmatic patients

The corticosteroid beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has been formulated with the long acting beta agonist formoterol (BDP/formoterol 100 microg/6 microg, Foster) in a single inhaler using Modulite technology. We have investigated the acute tolerability of high, cumulative doses of BDP/formoterol compared to formoterol alone and placebo. This was a double blind, 3-way cross-over comparison of 10 puffs of BDP/formoterol 100 microg/6 microg or formoterol 6 microg or placebo during maintenance treatment with BDP/formoterol two puffs per day. Pharmacokinetics over 12h during maintenance treatment was measured on day 7. High cumulative doses were then administered on three separated days. Eighteen patients with asthma were recruited (mean FEV(1) 65% predicted). The primary endpoint was serum potassium over the 12h period after high doses. QTc, blood pressure and heart rate over 12h, and plasma lactate and glucose over 3h following dosing were assessed. Formoterol caused a significantly greater decrease in serum potassium than BDP/formoterol or placebo (difference in mean minimum concentrations; 0.11 and -0.15 mmol/l, respectively, p<0.05 for both comparisons). No significant differences in serum potassium parameters were found between BDP/formoterol and placebo. QTc, plasma lactate and vital signs values observed with the combination were not statistically different from those with formoterol alone. For glucose, the mean maximum increase after formoterol treatment was 0.4 mmol/l (p<0.01 compared to placebo), while BDP/formoterol treatment caused a maximum increase of 0.7 mmol/l (p<0.01 compared to formoterol and placebo). The active metabolite of BDP is beclomethasone-17-monopropriate (B17MP), which reached Cmax at 0.25 h, with an elimination half-life of 3.7 h. Formoterol also reached Cmax at 0.25 h, and concentrations were measurable up to 12 h. High doses of BDP/formoterol did not significantly reduce serum potassium, while formoterol alone did to a greater extent. The BDP/formoterol combination was well tolerated, and exhibited a safety profile generally similar to formoterol alone when administered in high doses to stable asthmatic patients.     

Inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate improves acoustic measures of voice in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids have the potential to produce upper-airway side effects such as hoarseness. As new compounds and delivery devices are developed and compared, it is difficult to quantify their adverse upper-airway effects. OBJECTIVE: We undertook the following study to test the ability of an acoustic analysis technique to quantify changes in vocal function in steroid-naive patients with asthma who receive inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), 1,000 microg/d for 4 months. METHODS: Patients self-administered one of four regimens of inhaled BDP. Group 1 patients received one 250-microg puff qid via metered-dose inhaler (MDI); group 2 patients received one 250-microg puff qid via MDI with a holding chamber; group 3 patients received two 250-microg puffs bid via MDI; and group 4 patients received two 250-microg puffs bid via MDI with a holding chamber. A smaller cohort of nonsmoking asthmatic patients was managed without steroid intervention for 4 months. At baseline and again at 8 weeks and 16 weeks after the initiation of BDP treatment, patients underwent spirometry and methacholine challenge. At baseline and again at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks, patients underwent voice recording for analysis of voice parameters. The recorded vowels were low-pass filtered (10 KHz), digitized (22 KHz), and analyzed by software to obtain two acoustic measures: (1) jitter, the cycle-to-cycle variation in the time period of the voice signal; and (2) shimmer, the cycle-to-cycle variation in voice signal amplitude. RESULTS: We recruited 77 patients for randomization to inhaled steroid therapy and 10 patients who continued to receive only occasional inhaled bronchodilator therapy. In all active treatment groups, FEV(1), FVC, and provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) improved significantly after BDP treatment. Mean jitter scores, a measurement of variation in voice pitch, were not significantly influenced by BDP treatment. However, mean shimmer scores, a reflection of perturbation in vocal amplitude, fell significantly (p < 0.05) in the active treatment groups. These reductions in shimmer scores were not significantly different in the active treatment groups. Shimmer scores in the bronchodilator-treated group were unchanged during the 16 weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that a simple and noninvasive acoustic analysis of voice is sensitive to subclinical changes associated with inhaled corticosteroid therapy. We have shown that 1,000 microg/d of inhaled BDP actually improves specific acoustic measures of voice in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. These improvements were uninfluenced by dosing schedule and whether a spacing chamber was used.     

Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol compared with salbutamol in the treatment of acute asthma

This study compared the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) Turbuhaler)) with salbutamol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with spacer for relief of acute bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma. In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients (n = 104 allocated to treatment; n = 103 received treatment; mean age 45 years) seeking medical attention for acute asthma (mean FEV(1) 43% of predicted) received two doses repeated at t = -5 and 0 min of either budesonide/formoterol (320/9 microg, two inhalations) or salbutamol (100 microg x eight inhalations); total doses 1280/36 microg and 1600 microg, respectively. All patients received prednisolone 60 mg at 90 min and FEV(1) was assessed over 3h. FEV(1) 90 min after dosing (primary variable) increased compared with pre-dose FEV(1) by an average of 30% and 32% for budesonide/formoterol and salbutamol, respectively (P = 0.66), with similar increases at all timepoints from 3 to 180 min for both groups. Mean pulse rate over 3h was significantly higher in the salbutamol group versus the budesonide/formoterol group (92 vs. 88 bpm; P < 0.01). No treatment differences were seen for other vital signs, including ECG. High-dose budesonide/formoterol was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of acute asthma, with rapid onset of efficacy and a safety profile over 3h similar to high-dose salbutamol.