The potential role of Accident and Emergency departments in cadaveric organ donation

Nationally there is no uniform practice regarding the possibility of organ donation from Accident and Emergency Departments (A&E). Indeed, many hospital personnel, and the general public, assume that it is not possible to use organs from patients who die in this acute area. There are several reasons for this which include: anxiety surrounding asking bereaved relatives about organ donation; this group have not prepare themselves psychologically for the sudden and often early death of their relative; transplantation is rarely discussed with relatives of patients who die in A&E; lack of awareness regarding organs which can be used from the patient who has died unventilated, and contraindications for donation.The purpose of this paper is to identify organs suitable for transplantation. The history of organ donation, donor suitability, organ availability in general, donation requirements and the role of the coroner will also be discussed.As A&E nurses, we are often faced with the unexpected death of patients of all ages. Talking to the next-of-kin can be extremely stressful, but, through thoughtful planning, it is possible to discuss organ donation with them and achieve a successful outcome. Organ donation may be their only comfort, in knowing that some good has come from their relative's death.     

Willingness to communicate organ donation intention

OBJECTIVE: The study tested an intervention exposing people who planned to donate organs to written information about communicating with family their intention to donate organs. DESIGN: A pretest posttest double-blind experiment compared participants given written information about communicating with family and basic organ donation information, with participants given written information about only basic organ donation information. SAMPLE: Participants included 109 adults who had not yet communicated their plans with family. MEASURES: Participants first responded to previous experience with organ donation, thoughts about organ donation, willingness to communicate with family about organ donation, and knowledge about organ donation. After reading the respective pamphlet, participants again responded to thoughts about communicating with their family and willingness to communicate with family. RESULTS: Both groups responded with the same high willingness to communicate before the intervention and a small but significant increase in willingness to communicate afterwards. CONCLUSIONS: Participants expressed a high degree of willingness to communicate about their organ donation intentions even though they had thus far not communicated their intentions. Factors in addition to willingness to communicate need to be identified in order to encourage better communication about organ donation intentions.     

Non-heartbeating organ donation: a review

Organ transplantation is one of the groundbreaking achievements in medicine in the 20th century. In the early days of transplantation, organs were obtained from non-heartbeating (NHB) cadavers. With time, better options for organ sources became available (for example, living-related and "brain dead" donors), and the practice of obtaining organs from NHB cadavers fell out of favor. Improvements in the field of transplantation have led to an increased demand for organs. Various strategies have been employed recently to increase the supply, one of them being non-heartbeating organ donation (NHBOD). NHBOD can take place in controlled or uncontrolled circumstances. Recently, national organizations have supported and proposed guidelines for NHBOD and to aid clinicians in identifying potential donors. Outcomes of organs obtained from NHB cadavers are comparable to those obtained from heartbeating donors. The practice of NHBOD is increasing and has proven that it can contribute to increasing organ availability.     

Changing pattern of organ dysfunction in early human sepsis is related to mortality

OBJECTIVE: We examined the pattern of organ system dysfunction, the evolution of this pattern over time, and the relationship of these features to mortality in patients who had sepsis syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, observational study. SETTING: Intensive care units in tertiary referral teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 287 patients who had sepsis syndrome were prospectively identified in intensive care units. MATERIALS AND MEASUREMENTS: Cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurologic, coagulation, renal, and hepatic dysfunction were assessed at onset and on day 3 of sepsis syndrome. Organ dysfunction was classified as normal, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme dysfunction. We calculated the occurrence rate and associated 30-day mortality rate of organ dysfunction at the onset of sepsis syndrome. We then measured the change in organ dysfunction from onset to day 3 of sepsis syndrome and determined, for individual organ systems, the associated 30-day mortality rate. RESULTS: At the onset of sepsis syndrome, clinically significant pulmonary dysfunction was the most common organ failure, but was not related to 30-day mortality. Clinically significant cardiovascular, neurologic, coagulation, renal, and hepatic dysfunction were less common at the onset of sepsis syndrome but were significantly associated with the 30-day mortality rate. Worsening neurologic, coagulation, and renal dysfunction from onset to day 3 of sepsis syndrome were associated with significantly higher 30-day mortality than with improvement or no change in organ dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Increased mortality rate in sepsis syndrome is associated with a pattern characterized by failure of nonpulmonary organ systems and, in particular, worsening neurologic, coagulation, and renal dysfunction over the first 3 days. Although initial pulmonary dysfunction is common in patients with sepsis syndrome, it is not associated with an increased mortality rate.     

Why families deny consent to organ donation.

Advances in medical practice and technology and the success of organ transplantation over the past 2 decades have resulted in an increased demand for organ donors. However, the health care community and organ procurement organisations (OPO) are faced with a worldwide shortage of donor organs. The non-consent of families is the most common reason that organs of medically suitable potential donors are not recovered. A review of published research post 1990 was conducted to primarily determine the major factors that influence a family's decision to deny consent to donation. Other objectives included providing suggestions for health care personnel to facilitate the donation request experience and to suggest strategies that would increase donation consent rates to benefit the organ procurement process. Databases predominately used in the review included CINAHL and Medline. The world wide web (www) was also accessed. The literature review indicates that the significant factors associated with denial of consent include: the misunderstanding of brain death; cultural beliefs; the specific timing of the request; the setting in which the request is made; the approach of the individual making the request; and characteristics of the deceased. Organ donation and transplantation rates could be increased by the joint involvement of medical, nursing and OPO personnel to enhance the quality of hospital care and to ensure that requests for donation are handled in a way that meets the family's informational and emotional needs. Increased consent rates have the potential to save lives and improve the quality of life for organ recipients.     

A donation to life: organ procurement.

1. Only 15% of brain dead patients become organ donors. This is due to a lack of public education regarding the benefits of organ donation, lack of recognition of potential donors, poor donor management, and unfortunately, even the reluctance of health-care workers to approach families with the choice to donate. 2. Once the patient has been officially accepted as an organ donor and the consents have been signed, the donor goes through a thorough evaluation involving physician consultations and lab work, and the medical history is reviewed for possible complications. 3. As many as four surgical teams may be involved in organ procurement, and good communication between nurses, physicians, and coordinators is vital to promote successful recovery of donor organs.     

Obstacles to organ donation in Swedish intensive care units

OBJECTIVE: To identify obstacles to organ donation in Swedish intensive care units. DESIGN: A survey exploring attitudes and experiences of organ donation activities was sent to half of all anaesthetists and all neurosurgeons in Sweden (n=644). Total response rate was 67%; 69% from the anaesthetists and 54% from the neurosurgeons. RESULTS: Neurosurgeons had more experiences of caring for potential donors and requesting donation than anaesthetists. Twenty-seven percent of the anaesthetists were not confident with clinical neurological criteria for brain incarceration. Nine per cent found donation activities solely burdensome, and 14% wanted an external team to take over the donation request. A quarter regarded the request definitely as an extra load on the family, and more than half of the respondents had refrained from asking in emotionally strained situations. Forty-nine per cent had a neutral approach to relatives when requesting donation while 38% had a pro-donation approach. Thirty-six per cent terminated ventilator treatment for a potential donor without waiting for total brain infarction. Lack of resources in the ICUs resulted in not identifying a possible donor according to 29% of respondents. Knowing the prior wish of the deceased was regarded as the single most important factor that facilitated the work with organ donation for the intensivists. CONCLUSIONS: The identified obstacles (neutral approach of donation request, ethical problems concerning the potential donor and the relatives, varying competence in diagnosing total brain infarction, and lack of intensive care bed resources) require tailored efforts in order to increase organ donation. Checking these factors can be used as a quality control when analysing donation activities at hospitals.