Clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis

BackgroundOver the last twenty years, minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis has evolved into a well-tolerated and safe procedure. It has grown in favor to open ankle arthrodesis due to shorter length of stay and fewer complications recorded. This paper aims to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis at 24-months followup.MethodsFrom 2004 to 2015, we reviewed a prospectively collected database in a tertiary hospital foot and ankle registry. 28 feet that underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis were matched to 56 feet that underwent open ankle arthrodesis for age, sex and body mass index (BMI). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-hindfoot Scores and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were obtained to assess clinical outcomes. These parameters were collected before surgery, at 6 months and 24 months after surgery.ResultsThe arthroscopic group demonstrated significant less pain in the perioperative period (arthroscopic: 1.9 ± 1.2, open: 3.8 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and shorter length of hospitalization stay (arthroscopic: 2.1 ± 0.7 open: 3.5 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). Patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis also reported a higher SF-36 score on physical functioning at 6 months (arthroscopic: 58.4 ± 27.1, open: 47.1 ± 24.0, p < 0.05) and higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot Scale score at 24-months (arthroscopic: 78.9 ± 18.9, open: 68.9 ± 24.7, p < 0.05). There were no postoperative complications in the arthroscopic group but 11 in the open group, including 9 which required followup operations. There was no significant difference in length of operative procedure between both groups.ConclusionsWe conclude that the arthroscopic group displayed better clinical outcomes compared to the open group at the 24 months followup. The advantages of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis include significantly less perioperative pain, higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot scores at 24 months, shorter length of stay, fewer postoperative complications and followup operations.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative series.     

Intra-operative fluoroscopy time and radiation dose during suprapatellar tibial nailing versus infrapatellar tibial nailing

BackgroundFractures of the tibial shaft are routinely managed with intramedullary nailing. An increasingly accepted technique is the suprapatellar extended leg method. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the suprapatellar tibial nailing technique offers shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy times and lower radiation doses when compared to the traditional infrapatellar technique.Study design and methodsData from 200 consecutive intramedullary tibial nailing operations in our level 1 Major Trauma Centre were retrospectively collected from a prospective database (January 2014–December 2017). Only acute diaphyseal nailing procedures were included. The operations were performed by seven senior trauma consultants experienced in both suprapatellar and infrapatellar tibial nailing. The operations were divided into two groups: infrapatellar and suprapatellar. Intraoperative radiation time and dose data were collected.ResultsA total of 90 cases were included and analysed. The majority of the patients were male (82%). 37 operations were infrapatellar and 53 were suprapatellar. Independent samples t-test revealed lower radiation time and dose for the suprapatellar group. The infrapatellar group had a mean radiation time of 129.7 ± 56.6 s versus 94.4 ± 47.9 s for the suprapatellar group. The infrapatellar group had a mean radiation dose (Dose Area Product) 53.6 ± 34.2 cGY cm² versus 38.2 ± 26.7 cGY cm² for the suprapatellar group. The difference in mean radiation time and mean radiation dose were both significant (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02 respectively).ConclusionsSuprapatellar tibial nailing is an increasingly accepted technique in the management of tibial fractures. It is shown here that amongst surgeons experienced in both suprapatellar and infrapatellar nailing techniques, the suprapatellar approach trends towards lower use of intra-operative fluoroscopy as measured by time and dose and thus potentially lower radiation exposure to the operating surgeon, assistants and patient.     

Combined subtalar distraction arthrodesis with peroneus brevis tenotomy for posttraumatic subtalar arthritis

BackgroundSubtalar distraction arthrodesis is advocated as a salvage procedure for isolated posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. This study aimed at evaluating combined subtalar distraction arthrodesis with peroneus brevis tenotomy for such cases.MethodsTwenty patients with isolated posttraumatic subtalar arthritis managed by combined subtalar distraction arthrodesis and peroneus brevis tenotomy were reviewed for a retrospective study. The American orthopaedic foot and ankle society [AOFAS] hindfoot scoring, talocalcaneal height [TCH], talocalcaneal angle [TCA] and heel valgus angle [HVA] were used for both pre and postoperative assessments.ResultsThe mean postoperative [TCH] [70.3 ± 1.9 mm] was statistically better than the preoperative value [64.7 ± 2.2 mm] [p < 0.001]. There was a statistically significant decrease in [HVA] [p < 0.001]. On the contrary, there was a statistically significant increase in both [AOFAS] hindfoot scoring and the [TCA] [p < 0.001].ConclusionsApplying this technique for isolated posttraumatic subtalar arthritis with peroneal tendinitis improved both lateral retromalleolar swelling and deformity correction.     

Minimally-invasive hallux arthrodesis with endomedullary and a crossed screw fixation

BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery has several advantages: minor pain, smaller incisions and less tissue damage than traditional open surgery. Hallux arthrodesis with an endomedullary screw fixation provides compression and axial stability.The aim of this study was to describe the procedure and evaluate our first results of the minimally invasive first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with an endomedullary screw combined with a crossed screw fixation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 15 feet, with a minimum 1 year follow-up.Patients were evaluated with full-load radiographs and AOFAS score preoperatively and at last follow-up.ResultsConsolidation rate was 93.3%, radiological consolidation time was 18 weeks (14–60). Radiographic alignment was achieved with satisfactory results. The preoperative AOFAS score improved from a mean 49 to 90 (p = 0.001).There was one postoperative superficial site infection, which healed and a patient developed a pseudarthrosis but it was asymptomatic.ConclusionsThe minimally invasive metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with an intramedullary screw is a secure procedure with comparable results to open techniques.Level of Clinical Evidence4. Case series.     

Is intraoperative pedography helpful in clinical use—Preliminary results of 100 cases from a consecutive,prospective, randomized,controlled clinical study

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical use, and to analyze the potential clinical benefit of intraoperative pedography (IP) in a sufficient number of cases in comparison with cases treated without IP.MethodsPatients (age 18 years and older) which sustained an arthrodesis and/or correction of the foot and ankle were included.ResultsOne hundred cases were included (ankle correction arthrodesis, n = 12; subtalar joint correction arthrodesis, n = 14; arthrodesis without correction midfoot, n = 15; correction arthrodesis midfoot, n = 26; correction forefoot, n = 33). Fifty-two patients were randomized for the use of IP. In 24 of the 52 patients (46%), the correction was modified after IP during the same operation.ConclusionsIn 46% of the cases a modification of the surgical correction was made after IP in the same surgical procedure. Whether IP improve the plantar force distribution of the foot and the mid- or long-term clinical outcome has to be critically analyzed when longer follow-up is completed.     

Pedicle axis view combined by sacral mapping can decrease fluoroscopic shot count in percutaneous iliosacral screw placement

BackgroundPercutaneous iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring is a demanding procedure with high exposure to radiation. The conventional technique includes the use of three classical projections with the C-arm: inlet, outlet, and true lateral views. A projection in the axis of the upper sacral alar pedicles with a 30° cephalad and 30° ventral oblique view would help in obtaining a more accurate visualization of the safe corridor. Two subcutaneously placed K-wires, one placed horizontally and one vertically, may facilitate the starting point and aim changes by offering the surgeon an option for exactly matching the position of the sacrum with the image. The purpose of this study was to detect if the radiation application could be decreased by our new methodology.MethodsSeventeen patients with pelvic posterior ring disruptions, in which percutaneous iliosacral screw placement was indicated, were included in the study. Group 1 comprised 7 patients in whom conventional projections and technique were used. Group 2 comprised 10 patients in whom 30°–30° projection and sacral mapping technique via two subcutaneous K-wires were applied. Radiation exposure time, total fluoroscopic shot count, fluoroscopic shot count needed for only guide wire and screw placement, radiation dose, and complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe median number of fluoroscopic images for guide and screw placement was 132 (56–220) and 29.5 (19–83) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The median total fluoroscopic radiation time was 138 (68–234) and 52 (28–77) s in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, and the difference was significant (p < 0.001). Group 1 had a significantly higher median radiation dose than Group 2 [3020 (1502–6032) vs. 1192 (426–2359); (p = 0.001)].ConclusionsIliosacral screw placement with the help of sacral mapping and a fourth view, “30°–30°”, helps the surgeon to markedly reduce the fluoroscopic shots, radiation time and dose during guide wire and screw placement.Level of evidenceTherapeutic, Level II.     

Does the IOFIX improve compression in ankle fusion?

BackgroundThe new IOFIX is an intra-osseous fixation device comprising an “X-post” through which a lag screw passes to apparently improve force distribution across an arthrodesis.We conducted a novel human cadaveric study. Our null hypothesis was no difference in force exists in an ankle arthrodesis model stabilized with the IOFIX or a conventional single lag screw.MethodIn ten cadaver ankles a pressure transducer was compressed as an IOFIX and standard single lag screws were alternately compared.ResultsThe median average force created by the IOFIX was 3.95 kg and 2.4 kg for the single conventional lag screw (p ⩽ 0.01). The IOFIX improved contact area across the arthrodesis with a median average of 3.41 cm² compared with 2.42 cm² in the lag screw group (p ⩽ 0.03).ConclusionOur results suggest an IOFIX improves force distribution across an ankle arthrodesis compared with a single conventional lag screw.     

Primary stability and stiffness in ankle arthrodes—Crossed screws versus anterior plating

BackgroundAnkle arthrodesis is commonly used for the treatment of osteoarthritis or failed arthroplasty. Screw fixation is the predominant technique to perform ankle arthrodesis. Due to a considerable frequency of failures research suggests the use of an anatomically shaped anterior double plate system as a reliable method for isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis. The purpose of the present biomechanical study was to compare two groups of ankle fusion constructs – three screw fixation and an anterior double plate system – in terms of primary stability and stiffness.MethodsSix matched-pairs human cadaveric lower legs (Thiel fixated) were used in this study. One specimen from each pair was randomly assigned to be stabilized with the anterior double plate system and the other with the three-screw technique. The different arthrodesis methods were tested by dorsiflexing the foot until failure of the system, defined as rotation of the talus relative to the tibia in the sagittal plane. Experiments were performed on a universal materials testing machine. The force required to make arthrodesis fail was documented. For calculation of the stiffness, a linear regression was fitted to the force–displacement curve in the linear portion of the curve and its slope taken as the stiffness.ResultsFor the anatomically shaped double-plate system a mean load of 967 N was needed (range from 570 N to 1400 N) to make arthrodesis fail. The three-screw fixation method resisted a mean load of 190 N (range from 100 N to 280 N) (p = 0.005). In terms of stiffness a mean of 56 N/mm (range from 35 N/mm to 79 N/mm) was achieved for the anatomically shaped double-plate system whereas a mean of 10 N/mm (range from 6 N/mm to 18 N/mm) was achieved for the three-screw fixation method (p = 0.004).ConclusionsOur biomechanical data demonstrates that the anterior double-plate system is significantly superior to the three-screw fixation technique for ankle arthrodesis in terms of primary stability and stiffness.     

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: Are results reproducible irrespective of pre-operative deformity?

BackgroundArthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is gaining in popularity. It has been shown to have a shorter time to union and less morbidity than traditional open procedures. The arthroscopic technique has been mainly used for ankles with minimal deformity. Our aim was to find out whether we could reproduce the good results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in both minimally and markedly deformed ankles.MethodsWe reviewed 62 patients who underwent an arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis for end stage arthritis. The average follow up was 63 months (range 21–92 months). Patients were evaluated subjectively and objectively using the Mazur grading system. 4 patients died before final review and 3 were lost to follow-up leaving 55 patients for evaluation.The pre-operative tibiotalar angle in the coronal plane was between 26° valgus and 24° varus. We divided our patients into 2 groups based on the tibiotalar angle. Group A (n = 31) had a varus or valgus deformity of less than 15? and Group B (n = 24) had a deformity equal to or more than 15°.ResultsThe overall fusion rate was 91%. Fusion occurred in 29 of 31 (94%) ankles in Group A compared to 21 of 24 (88%) in Group B (p = 0.64).The overall mean time to union was 10.4 weeks. The time to union in Group A was 8.8 weeks compared to 12.7 weeks for Group B (p = 0.001). Using the Mazur ankle grading system, 84% of the cases in Group A had a good to excellent result compared to 79% in Group B (p = 0.73). There were 2 superficial infections, 2 cases of deep vein thrombosis and 3 patients required removal of prominent screws.ConclusionsWe have shown that arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis yields reliable and reproducible results in a District General Hospital setting with high union rates, short time to union and low complication rates. It can be satisfactorily employed for ankles with significant deformity, although this resulted in a longer time to union. The end results remain uniformly good to excellent.     

Prognostic risk factors for complications associated with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a nail

BackgroundTibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a nail can be an effective salvage procedure for several foot and ankle pathologies, but has a relatively high complication rate. The purpose of this study is to investigate risk factors associated with complications after TTC arthrodesis with a nail.MethodsClinical and radiographic outcomes for 82 patients from 2012 to 2016 who underwent TTC arthrodesis with a nail were retrospectivelyevaluated to determine if patient or surgeon specific variables offered prognostic value in predicting negative outcomes.ResultsDiabetes, diabetic neuropathy, high (>2) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and Charcot neuroarthropathy all were predictive of developing a nonunion in either the subtalar ortibiotalar joints (p < 0.05). Diabetic neuropathy was predictive ofreoperation, and along with HbA1C >7.5 was also predictive of hardwarefailure. The odds ratio (OR) for diabetic neuropathy was 2.99 (p < 0.05)for nonunion in the tibiotalar or subtalar joints, 3.46 (p < 0.05) for reoperation,and 4.11 (p < 0.05) for hardware failure. High ASAclassification had an odds ratio of 3.93 (p < 0.05) for nonunion in the tibiotalar or subtalar joints as well. Diabetes had an odds ratio of 2.57 (p < 0.05) for nonunion.ConclusionsPatients with diabetic neuropathy, Charcot neuroarthropathy, elevated HbA1C, and ASA classification >2 demonstrated a higher complication rate in patients undergoing TTC arthrodesis with a nail.     

Short-term and mid-term outcome of total ankle replacement in haemophilic patients

BackgroundAnkle arthropathy is very frequent in haemophilic patients. Prostheses are valuable alternatives to arthrodesis in non-haemophilic patients. We report the experience of a single centre in France on the use of prostheses in haemophilic patients.MethodsRetrospective study of 21 patients with haemarthropathy who underwent ankle arthroplasty (32 ankles), with additional surgery, if needed, from July 2002 to September 2009 (mean follow-up 4.4 ± 1.7 years). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle–hindfoot scale was used to evaluate pain, function, ankle mobility and alignment.ResultsThe overall AOFAS score improved from 40.2 ± 19.4 (pre-surgery) to 85.3 ± 11.4 (post-surgery). The function score increased from 23.6 ± 7.7 to 35.9 ± 6.7 and dorsiflexion from 0.3° ± 5.0° to 10.3° ± 4.4°. Two patients underwent further ankle arthrodesis. On X-ray, both tibial and talar components were stable and correctly placed in all ankles. Alignment was good.ConclusionAnkle arthroplasty is a promising alternative to arthrodesis in haemophilic patients.     

External versus internal fixation for arthrodesis of chronic ankle joint infections — A comparative retrospective study

BackgroundArthrodesis of the ankle is a salvage procedure in case of chronic ankle joint infection. External fixation still is the gold standard.We compared the outcome of external fixator versus intramedullary nailing for arthrodesis of the infected ankle joint.MethodsAll patients with ankle joint infection who received arthrodesis with either external fixator or intramedullary nail between 08/2009 and 09/2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Endpoints were the successful control of infection, osseous fusion, and mobilization with full weightbearing.ResultsSeventy-one patients were included. Nineteen patients (27%) suffered reinfection. Patients with intramedullary nailing showed significantly fewer reinfections (p = 0.019), achieved full weightbearing significantly more often (p = 0.042) and faster and developed significantly fewer complications (p < 0.001). Forty-three patients showed bone fusion without significant differences between the groups.ConclusionsAnkle arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing appears to be a successful alternative to the established procedure of external fixation in cases of chronic ankle joint infection.     

Bipolar fresh total osteochondral allograft in the ankle: Is it a successful long-term solution?

IntroductionSevere post-traumatic ankle arthritis poses a reconstructive challenge in young and active patients. Although technically demanding and despite unsolved immunological issues, bipolar fresh total osteochondral allograft (BFTOA) represent an intriguing option to arthrodesis and prosthetic replacement. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the outcomes of a series of 48 ankle BFTOA at 10 years follow up and to investigate the rate of survival long term.Methods58 patients underwent BFTOA, of these 48 were available for follow up. The allograft was prepared with the help of specifically designed jigs and the surgery was performed using either a lateral or a direct anterior approach. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically preoperatively, and at a mean 121 ± 18 months of follow-up.ResultsThe AOFAS score improved from 31 ± 11 pre operatively, to 65 ± 25 at the last (p < 0.0005). Fourteen failures occurred, with 70.8% allograft rate of survival. All the surviving allografts showed a reduction of the ankle joint movement, still associated with a satisfactory clinical result.ConclusionThe use of BFTOA represents an intriguing option to arthrodesis or arthroplasty. A satisfactory clinical result associated to a good movement of the transplanted joint is to be expected up to short-mid-term, overtime. Long term, the range of motion (ROM) is progressively decreased up to spontaneous arthrodesis in some cases, still the joint results pain free and patient’s perception is of a well functioning ankle. A deeper knowledge of the immunological behavior of transplanted cartilage is needed in order to improve the durability of this fascinating technique.     

How many screws are necessary for subtalar fusion? A retrospective study

BackgroundBiomechanical studies have shown a higher compressive force and higher torsional stiffness for fixation with three screws compared to two screws. However, clinical data to compare these fixation techniques is still lacking.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 113 patients was performed, who underwent isolated subtalar fusion between January 2006 and April 2018.ResultsRevision arthrodesis was required in 8% (n = 6/36) for 3-screw-fixation and 38% (n = 35/77) for 2-screw-fixation. For 3-screw-fixation, non-union, was observed in 14% (n = 5/36) compared to 35% (n = 27/77) in 2-screw fixation. Non-union (p = .025) and revision arthrodesis (p = .034) were significantly more frequent in patients with 2 screws. A body mass index ≥30 kg/m² (p = .04, OR = 2.6,95%CI:1.1–6.3), prior ankle-fusion (p = .017,OR = 4.4,95%CI:1.3–14.5) and diabetes mellitus (p = .04,OR = 4.9,95%CI:1.1–17.8) were associated with a higher rate of revision arthrodesis.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that successful subtalar fusion is more reliably achieved with use of three screws. However, future prospective studies will be necessary to further specify this recommendation.     

Comparação de videolaringoscópio com canal e máscara laríngea na intubação traqueal de pacientes obesos: estudo clínico randomizado

BackgroundObesity causes various difficulties in intubation and ventilation, which are confronted due to increased fat tissue in the upper airway and diminished compliance in the chest wall. Videolaryngoscopes and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) are good options as recommended by the American Society of Anesthesologists (ASA) difficult airway guidelines. We aimed to compare ILMA and Airtraq (a channeled videolaryngoscope) in obese patients.MethodsEighty patients with ASA physical status I‐III, aged between 18 and 65 years and with a body mass index greater than 35 kg.m^‐2, who were undergoing elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation, were included in the study. Patients were intubated with one of the devices cited.ResultsThere was no difference between the number of intubation attempts, insertion times and need for optimisation manoeuvres of Airtraq and ILMA. The intubation with Airtraq was accomplished in a shorter period of time than in that in the ILMA group (29.9 ± 22.1 s vs. 50.7 ± 21.2 s; p < 0.001). A significant difference was found when the times of total intubation were compared (29.9 ± 22.1 s vs. 97.4 ± 42.7 s; p < 0.001). The mean arterial pressure statistically increased after device insertion in the ILMA group (p < 0.05).ConclusionsAirtraq appears to be superior to ILMA in obese patients, with a total of time intubation of less than 60 seconds and with low mean arterial pressure changes. However, ILMA is still a useful tool that provides both ventilation and intubation throughout the whole intubation process.     

Conversion of painful tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis to total ankle replacement using a 3-component mobile bearing prosthesis

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent conversion of a painful tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis to a total ankle replacement.MethodsSix patients with painful ankle arthrodesis after tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis were included in this study. In all patients, conversion to total ankle replacement was performed using a 3^rd-generation, non-constrained, cementless three-component prosthesis. The outcomes were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.9 years (range 1.0–6.5).ResultsOne patient with painful arthrofibrosis underwent two open arthrolysis procedures at 1.2 and 5.6 years post index surgery, respectively. No revision of tibial or talar prosthesis components was necessary in this study. All patients reported significant pain relief and significant improvement in functional status.ConclusionIn the present study, the conversion of a painful ankle arthrodesis following tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis to a total ankle replacement was a reliable surgical treatment.     

Pharmacokinetics and safety of tobramycin administered by the PARI eFlow® rapid nebulizer in cystic fibrosis

BackgroundNebulization times have been identified as an issue in patient compliance with tobramycin solution for inhalation (TSI) therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF).MethodsIn this randomized, open-label, multicentre, two-period, crossover study, patients (n = 25) with CF and chronic pulmonary pseudomonal infection received TSI for 15 days via eFlow rapid or LC PLUS nebulizer. Nebulization times and sputum/serum tobramycin concentrations were determined, and safety evaluated.ResultsNebulization times were significantly shorter for eFlow rapid versus LC PLUS on Day 1 (least squares mean estimate of the difference − 10.5 min, 95% confidence intervals [CI] − 12.6, − 8.3, p < 0.0001) and Day 15 (difference − 7.7 min, 95% CI − 9.0, − 6.5, p < 0.0001). Broadly comparable sputum/systemic exposure to tobramycin was observed and the incidence of adverse events was similar for both nebulizers.ConclusionUse of the eFlow rapid nebulizer reduced TSI nebulization time. The systemic exposure to tobramycin appeared to be broadly similar in this exploratory study.     

Biomechanical comparison of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodeses using triple-threaded headless screws versus partially threaded lag screws

BackgroundTriple-threaded, cannulated headless screws of varying thread diameters and pitch are designed to maintain thread length across the arthrodesis plane, provide joint compression, and reduce countersinking. This study tested the biomechanical fixation strength of conventional partially threaded lag screws compared to triple-threaded headless screws in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis.MethodsFirst metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using a crossed screw technique was performed on 11 paired, preserved cadaver first rays with two 4.0-mm triple-threaded, cannulated headless screws or two 4.0-mm partially threaded, cannulated lag screws. The constructs were tested to failure through dorsally directed cantilever bending.ResultsThe triple-threaded, cannulated headless screws displayed significantly greater bending stiffness (p = 0.017) and failure load (p = 0.040) during load-to-failure testing compared to the partially threaded, cannulated lag screws.ConclusionsTriple-threaded, cannulated headless screws may be a viable alternative to partially threaded lag screws in first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis.     

Cirugía retroperitoneal asistida por robot por puerto único: un abordaje factible

IntroductionThe concept of surgery through a single incision has been pursued in the field of minimal invasion for the treatment of different pathologies. This, added to a retroperitoneal approach, implies less aggression for the patient at different levels. We describe the first cases of single-port robot-assisted retroperitoneal surgery (SP-RARS) in our country using the Da Vinci Xi® system.Material and methodsWe present 2 cases of patients with right adrenal masses larger than 4 cm. The first case was a 55-year-old woman with an incidental diagnosis of angiomyolipoma, and the second case was a 62-year-old man with a non-functioning adrenal adenoma. Both cases were operated through a single 4 cm subcostal incision using the Da Vinci Xi® system, annulling arm 4 without reallocating laterality on the surgeon's console.ResultsConsole times for surgeries were 75 and 150 min, with access and docking times below 30 min. Bleeding was less than 100 cc in both surgeries with no need of accesory trocars, make new incisions or leave a drainage tube. The surgical specimens were removed through the same initial incision without the need for enlargement. Postoperative intravenous analgesia was not necessary in any case (VAS 0) and hospital stay was less than 24 h in both patients, without reporting any complications.ConclusionsSP-RARS is a feasible approach using the Da Vinci Xi® system.     

Évaluation de l’exposition aux radiations du chirurgien lors d’un TLIF mini-invasif : comparaison entre fluoroscopie et navigation O-arm

IntroductionTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a minimally invasive approach (MIS TLIF) has become a very popular technique in the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine, as it allows a decrease in muscle iatrogenic. However, iterative radiological controls inherent to this technique are responsible for a significant increase in exposure to ionizing radiation for the surgeon. New techniques for radiological guidance (O-arm navigation-assisted) would overcome this drawback, but this remains unproven.ObjectivesTo analyze the exposure of the surgeon to intraoperative X-ray during a MIS TLIF under fluoroscopy and under O-arm navigation-assisted.Materials and methodsThis prospective study was conducted at the University Hospital of Lille from February to May 2013. Twelve patients underwent a MIS TLIF for the treatment of low-grade spondylolisthesis; six under standard fluoroscopy (group 1) and six under O-arm system (group 2). Passive dosimeters (rings and glasses) and active dosimeters for thorax were used to measure the radiation exposure of the surgeon.ResultsFor group 1, the average time of fluoroscopy was 3.718 minutes (3.13–4.56) while no radioscopy was perform on group 2. For the first group, the average exposure dose was 12 μSv (5–20 μSv) on the thorax, 1168 μSv (510–2790 μSv) on the main hand and 179 μSv (103–486 μSv) on the lens. The exposure dose was measured zero on the second group.ConclusionThe maximum recommended doses can be reached, mainly for the lens. In addition to the radioprotection measures, O-arm navigation systems are safe alternatives to significantly reduce surgeon exposure.