Difference in neointimal coverage at chronic stage between bare metal stent and sirolimus-eluting stent evaluated at stent-strut level by optical coherence tomography

Compared with the bare metal stent (BMS), suppression of neointimal growth in the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) reduced restenosis at the cost of more exposed struts that could impose the risk of stent thrombosis. The present study was conducted to analyze neointimal coverage patterns of stents at a strut-level after implantation of BMS or SES with the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT). We enrolled 35 patients and analyzed neointimal coverage of every strut from 41 stents (BMS: n = 8, SES: n = 33) by using OCT at follow-up of the stent implantation. All of the 371 struts from eight BMSs were covered with ≥100 μm of neointima, while 19.8 and 3.5 % of 3,478 struts from 33 SESs were uncovered (neointimal thickness of <10 μm) and malapposed, respectively. The histogram of neointimal thickness showed basically normal distribution in BMS but skewed in SES. No regional difference in neointimal thickness was observed in BMS (proximal, 535.7 ± 25.2 μm; body, 532.4 ± 17.0 μm; distal, 485.8 ± 27.0 μm). In SES, however, the body segment showed thinner neointima [median 40 μm (interquartile range (IQR) 10–90 μm)] than proximal [60 μm (IQR 10–140 μm), p < 0.001] or distal [50 μm (IQR 10–110 μm), p < 0.001] segment, while uncovered and malapposed struts were more frequent in the proximal and body segments. In conclusion, SES, compared with BMS, showed more suppressed neointimal growth with regional variation: neointimal thickness was the least in the body part while the ratio of exposed and malapposed struts was minimal in the distal segment. OCT was useful for a strut-level analysis of neointimal coverage over the whole stent.     

Neointimal coverage and late apposition of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted in the acute phase of myocardial infarction: OCT data from the PRAGUE-19 study

Incomplete stent apposition and uncovered struts are associated with a higher risk of stent thrombosis. No data exist on the process of neointimal coverage and late apposition status of the bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) when implanted in the highly thrombogenic setting of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to assess the serial changes in strut apposition and early neointimal coverage of the BVS using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in selected patients enrolled in the PRAGUE-19 study. Intracoronary OCT was performed in 50 patients at the end of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute STEMI. Repeated OCT of the implanted BVS was performed in 10 patients. Scaffold area, scaffold mean diameter and incomplete strut apposition (ISA) were compared between baseline and control OCT. Furthermore, strut neointimal coverage was assessed during the control OCT. Mean scaffold area and diameter did not change between the baseline and control OCT (8.59 vs. 9.06 mm²; p = 0.129 and 3.31 vs. 3.37 mm; p = 0.202, respectively). Differences were observed in ISA between the baseline and control OCT (0.63 vs. 1.47 %; p < 0.05). We observed 83.1 % covered struts in eight patients in whom the control OCT was performed 4–6 weeks after BVS implantation, and 100 % covered struts in two patients 6 months after BVS implantation. Persistent strut apposition and early neointimal coverage were observed after biodegradable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.     

Optical coherence tomography analysis of strut coverage in biolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents: 3-Month and 12-month serial follow-up

Background

No randomized studies have been conducted to investigate serial changes in optical coherence tomography (OCT) analyses following implantation of biolimus-A9-eluting stents (BES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).

Methods

A total of 60 patients fulfilling the study criteria were randomly assigned into BES (n = 30) and SES (n = 30) implantation groups. Serial OCT evaluation at post-procedure, 3- and 12-month follow-up was performed in 46 patients [BES (n = 22) and SES (n = 24)]. OCT analyses were compared according to the type of stents and the follow-up time intervals. The percentage of uncovered struts was defined as the ratio of uncovered struts to total struts in all cross-sections. The primary endpoint was the percentage change (Δ) of uncovered struts in the 3- and 12-month follow-up samples.

Results

The percentage of uncovered struts at the 3-month time period was not significantly different in the BES and SES groups; the median value (interquartile range) was 14.7% (0.0–23.4) versus 8.6% (0.7–21.5) (p = 0.98), respectively. However, OCT at the 12-month follow-up showed a significantly lower percentage of uncovered struts [2.6% (0.8–5.6) versus 6.2% (1.7–14.7), (p = 0.028), respectively] without significant difference of neointimal thickness. BES showed a greater reduction of percentage Δ of uncovered struts from 3–12 months than that of SES [− 17.2 ± 14.5% versus − 7.7 ± 16.3%, respectively (p = 0.043)].

Conclusions

Both drug-eluting stents showed a high percentage of incomplete strut coverage at 3 months. However, BES showed a significantly lower percentage of uncovered struts at 12 months compared to that of SES. This was achieved by superior strut coverage from 3 to 12 months.     

Neointimal coverage of zotarolimus-eluting stent at 1, 2, and 3 months’ follow-up: an optical coherence tomography study

Incomplete neointimal coverage and malapposed struts after stenting are associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis. We aimed to evaluate neointimal coverage early after Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). A total of 20 patients with de novo native coronary lesions with R-ZES were enrolled. Among these patients, 20 stented lesions in 19 patients were evaluated at 1, 2, and 3 months after R-ZES implantation. The strut apposition and neointimal coverage were evaluated by OCT. Neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness and percentage of covered struts and the proportion of incompletely apposed struts were measured at 1-mm intervals. The mean percentages of covered stent struts were over 85 % within 3 months (88.4 ± 6.3 % at 1 month, 95.5 ± 5.5 % at 2 months, 93.6 ± 3.5 % at 3 months). The percentages of incompletely apposed struts were not significantly different among the groups (4.4 ± 4.2 % at 1 month, 1.9 ± 1.9 % at 2 months, 3.1 ± 2.2 % at 3 months, p = 0.51). Mean NIH thickness (38.9 ± 8.1 μm at 1 month, 70.6 ± 18.8 μm at 2 months, 54.1 ± 5.9 at 3 months, p = 0.0016) was thickest in the 2 months group. Most of all OCT findings within 2 months demonstrated neointimal coverage with low signal intensity. The neointimal coverage of ZES-R was over 85 % within 3 months. These data may support shorter requirement of dual antiplatelet therapy duration with R-ZES.     

药物洗脱支架术后冠状动脉造影随访无再狭窄患者光学相干断层成像检查结果分析

Objective:To evaluate neointimal coverage after Drug Eluting Stent implantation without no restenosis during angiographic follow up by using optical coherence tomography(OCT).Methods:18 case enrolled into this project who received angiography follow up and OCT checkout.Results:1.Totally,4709 struts were analyzed and 88.6% were completely covered with neointimal,and 0.7% were partly covered and 8.1% were uncovered.The rate of late malapposition of struts was 2.6%.The average neointimal hyperplasia thickness...     

Neointimal coverage of sirolimus-eluting stents at 6-month follow-up: evaluated by optical coherence tomography.

AIMS: Since the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) cannot detect neointimal layers in the majority of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) at the chronic phase, it is still controversial to what extent SES remain uncovered. However, optical coherence tomography (OCT) with excellent resolution may be able to detect thinner neointima. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 34 patients (57 SES) underwent OCT and IVUS evaluations at 6-month follow-up. The thickness of neointima on each SES strut cross-section and strut apposition to the vessel wall was evaluated. By OCT evaluation, the median (25th, 75th percentiles) neointima thickness was 52.5 microm (28.0 microm, 147.6 microm) and the prevalence of struts covered by thin neointima undetectable by IVUS was 64%. The average rate of neointima-covered struts in an individual SES was 89%. Nine SES (16%) showed full coverage by neointima, whereas the remaining stents had partially uncovered strut lesions. Among the 6840 struts visualized by OCT in all of the SES, 79 struts showed malapposition without neointimal coverage, and were frequently observed in the areas of SES overlap. CONCLUSION: At 6 months, most of the SES were covered with thin neointima, but few showed full coverage.     

Assessment of Vascular Patency and Inflammation with Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Superficial Femoral Artery Disease Treated with Zilver PTX Stents

PurposeZilver PTX nitinol self-expanding drug-eluting stent with paclitaxel coating is effective for treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease. However, as with any stent, it induces a measure of vascular inflammatory response. The current clinical trial (NCT02734836) aimed to assess vascular patency, remodeling, and inflammatory markers with intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with SFA disease treated with Zilver PTX stents.MethodsSerial OCT examinations were performed in 13 patients at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Variables evaluated included neointimal area, luminal narrowing, thrombus area, stent expansion as well as measures of inflammation including, peri-strut low-intensity area (PLIA), macrophage arc, neovascularization, stent strut apposition and coverage.ResultsPercentage of malapposed struts decreased from 10.3 ± 7.9% post-intervention to 1.1 ± 2.2% at 12-month follow-up, but one patient showed late-acquired stent malapposition (LASM). The percent of uncovered struts at follow-up was 3.0 ± 4.5%. Average expansion of stent cross-sectional area from baseline to follow-up was 35 ± 19%. The average neointimal area was 7.8 ± 3.8 mm². Maximal luminal narrowing was 61.1 ± 25.0%, and average luminal narrowing was 35.4 ± 18.2%. Average peri-strut low-intensity area (PLIA) per strut was 0.017 ± 0.018 mm². Average number of neovessels per mm of stent was 0.138 ± 0.181. Average macrophage angle per frame at follow-up was 7 ± 11°. Average thrombus area at follow-up was 0.0093 ± 0.0184 mm².ConclusionAt 12-month follow-up, OCT analysis of Zilver PTX stent shows outward remodeling and minimal neointimal growth, but evidence of inflammation including PLIA, neovessels, thrombus and macrophages.SummaryThirteen patients with PAD had paclitaxel-coated stents implanted in their SFAs and were then imaged with OCT at baseline and 12-month follow-up. OCT proxy metrics of inflammation were quantified.     

Neointimal coverage and stent strut apposition six months after implantation of a paclitaxel eluting stent in acute coronary syndromes: An optical coherence tomography study

Objectives

Prospective optical coherence tomography (OCT) study of strut apposition and neointimal hyperplasia thickness (NIH) of a paclitaxel eluting stent (PES), (Infinium, Sahajanand Medical Technologies Pvt Ltd.).

Background

Few data exist concerning neointimal coverage of PES. Uncovered and malapposed struts are more common following stenting in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) than in non-ACS lesions.

Methods

All consecutive patients with ACS, treated with the above PES for single native coronary lesions between August 2008 and January 2009, who consented to invasive follow-up with OCT at six months (N = 13), were included.

Results

At 6 months no patient demonstrated angiographic restenosis. 3180 struts from 20 stents were analyzed, and 91.3% were covered with neointima (NIH 204.8 ± 159.5 μm). Standard statistics and least squares estimates (LSE) derived from a hierarchical ANCOVA model to take into account clustering effects are presented. Rate of uncovered struts was 8.6%, LSE 7.39 (95% CI 3.05-11.73), malapposed struts 2.2%, LSE 1.76 (95% CI 0.05-3.58), and protruding struts 2.9%, LSE 2.8 (95% CI 1.35-4.65). The proportion of uncovered malapposed struts was significantly higher compared to uncovered embedded struts (55.7% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.01). In total, 5 (25%) PES were fully covered by neointima. No intracoronary thrombus or clinical events were detected.

Conclusions

Six months after implantation of a specific PES in patients with ACS, most of the stents were only partially covered with neointima, especially at sites of strut malapposition or protrusion. These findings emphasize the need for optimal stent apposition during implantation and for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy.     

First-in-Man Evaluation of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Abluminal Fluoropolymeric/Triflusal Coating With Ultrathin Struts by OCT at 9 Months' Follow-Up: The PROMETHEUS Study

ObjectivesWe sought to investigate stent healing and neointimal hyperplasia with ihtDEStiny drug-eluting stent (DES) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination conducted 9 months after implantation.BackgroundThe currently used DES present certain features that have been linked separately to their better performance in terms of efficacy and safety.MethodsFirst-in-man, prospective and multicenter study including patients treated with ihtDEStiny stent undergoing OCT examination at 9 months follow up. The ihtDEStiny stent is a sirolimus eluting stent with an oval shape ultrathin struts (68 μm) and an abluminal coating of a fluoropolymer containing the antiplatelet agent triflusal. Primary endpoint was the percentage of obstruction of the in-stent volume by the neointima.ResultsIn 58 patients (63 lesions) in-stent late lumen loss was 0.11 ± 0.23 mm (95% CI 0.05–0.16) with only in 6% of stents being > 0.5 mm and in-segment binary stenosis was 1.6%. In OCT mean neointima volume obstruction was 10.5 ± 6.9% with a mean neointima thickness of 110.9 ± 89.8 μm. The proportion of uncovered struts was 2.5%, malapposed struts 1.1% and malapposed/uncovered struts 0.7% and no subclinical thrombi detected. Mean incomplete stent apposition area was 0.1 ± 0.1 mm². At 12 months target lesion revascularization rate was 3% and no stent thrombosis was reported.ConclusionsIn this study the ihtDEStiny stent has shown a very low degree of neointimal proliferation associated with a low rate of uncovered/malapposed struts and total absence of subclinical thrombi at 9 months follow up.     

Early vascular healing with rapid breakdown biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography

BackgroundDifferences in early arterial healing patterns after stent implantation between biodegradable and durable polymer based new generation drug-eluting stents are not well understood. The aim of this study was to compare the healing patterns of a novel rapid breakdown (≤ 8 weeks) biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) using intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 4 months.MethodsA total of 20 patients were randomly assigned to stenting with BP-SES (n = 11) or EES (n = 9). Overall intravascular imaging was available for 15 (75%) patients. The primary endpoint was the difference in rate of uncovered struts between BP-SES and EES. To account for strut-level clustering, the results in both treatment groups were compared using a generalized linear mixed model approach.ResultsRegarding the primary endpoint, BP-SES as compared to EES showed similar rates of uncovered struts (37 [6.8%] versus 167 [17.5%], odds ratio (OR) 0.45 (95% CI 0.09-2.24), p = 0.33). There were no malapposed struts in BP-SES group and 14 malapposed struts in EES group (p = 0.97). No difference in percent neointimal volume (14.1 ± 8.2% vs. 11.4 ± 6.4%, p = 0.56) was observed.ConclusionsAlthough rapid-breakdown BP-SES as compared to EES showed signs of improved early tissue coverage, after adjustment for strut-level clustering these differences were not statistically significant. No differences in ability to suppress neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation between 2 stents were observed.     

A meta-analysis of randomized trials and adjusted observational studies of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease

BackgroundAcute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an independent risk factor for late stent thrombosis which might be related to the impaired vascular healing after drug-eluting stent (DES) due to the disruption of plaques and thrombus formation. Therefore, we investigated the vascular response after various DES implantations between ACS and stable angina pectoris (SAP) using optical coherence tomography (OCT).MethodsNinety-one patients [49 ACS: 20 sirolimus-eluting (SES), 12 paclitaxel-eluting (PES) and 17 zotarolimus eluting stent (ZES) and 42 SAP: 15 SES, 12 PES and 15 ZES] underwent OCT at 9 months after stent implantation. Neointimal coverage and malapposition were evaluated in 21,939 struts in 2269-mm stented segments.ResultsIn the ACS group, the incidence of uncovered and malapposed struts was significantly higher (8.9 ± 13.7 vs 2.9 ± 6.2%, p = 0.01 and 2.2 ± 5.6 vs 0.5 ± 2.0%, p = 0.02). Among the three DESs tested, SES showed a significantly higher rate of uncovered struts in the ACS group (17.3 ± 13.4 vs 4.4 ± 6.2%, p = 0.003). PES had a trend toward higher rate of uncovered and malapposed struts in the ACS groups (6.7 ± 7.6 vs 4.0 ± 9.0%, p = 0.13) while ZES was similar in both groups.ConclusionThe patterns of neointimal coverage and malapposition at 9 months after DES implantation were different between ACS and SAP, and variable among the DES type between two groups. Therefore, the present study suggests that vascular response after DES implantation might be influenced by both clinical presentation and type of DES.     

Influence of Plaque Characteristics on Early Vascular Healing in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

ObjectivesTo compare the early vascular healing of ruptured plaques (RP) and non-ruptured plaques (NRP) one month after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), using optical coherence tomography (OCT).BackgroundVascular healing and strut coverage are important factors in reducing the risk of stent thrombosis after PCI. Influence of underlying lesion characteristics and differences in healing response between RP and NRP are unknown.MethodsTwenty-six STEMI-patients underwent PCI and implantation of a polymer-free drug-coated Biofreedom stent (BF-BES). OCT was performed pre-PCI, post-PCI and at 1-month follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups: RP = 15 and NRP = 11. OCT analyses of culprit lesion, post stent implantation at baseline and follow-up were performed to determine the difference in vascular healing based on presence of uncovered and/or malapposed stent struts and intraluminal filling defects.ResultsThe stent coverage did not differ significantly between the two groups at 1-month follow-up with percentage of uncovered struts: RP 26.5% [IQR 15.0–49.0] and NRP 28.1% [IQR 15.5–38.8] for NRP (p = 0.78). At 1-month, RP showed an increased percentage of late acquired malapposed struts (1.4% [IQR 0.8–2.4] vs. 0.0% [IQR 0.0–1.4], p = 0.03) and a larger total malapposition area (1.3 mm² [IQR 0.4–2.5] vs. 0.0 mm² [IQR 0.0–0.9], p = 0.01), compared to NRP.ConclusionThree out of four struts were covered within one month after stenting. The vascular healing was comparable in RP and NRP on stent coverage. However, RP had more and larger late acquired malapposition areas.     

Comparison of neointimal coverage and extra-stent lumen between sirolimus and everolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography

The external lumen of a stent [defined as extra-stent lumen (ESL)] assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) may be related to the risk of thrombus formation after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. An everolimus-eluting stent (EES) might provide relatively minimal inflammatory reaction and appropriate neointimal coverage. The purpose of this study was to compare the neointimal thickness and ESL between SES and EES. Patients who underwent OCT examination more than 7 months after either SES or EES implantation were enrolled. Stent area (SA), lumen area (LA), neointimal area (NIA) and neointimal thickness (NIT) of each strut were measured at 1-mm intervals between stented segments. The area, angle (summation per cross-section) and depth (maximum distance from adjacent vessel surface to the outline of stent) of ESL were analyzed. A total of 49 lesions were included (SES n = 20, EES n = 29). Mean follow-up period was 11 months. A total of 998 cross-sections and 9874 struts were analyzed. There were no differences in stent area, lumen area and neointimal area (SA: 6.01 ± 1.60 vs. 6.02 ± 1.40 mm², p = 0.572, LA: 5.37 ± 1.52 vs. 5.29 ± 1.34 mm², p = 0.692, NIA: 0.64 ± 0.49 vs. 0.72 ± 0.37 mm², p = 0.493). Mean NIT of SES and EES were 0.11 ± 0.05 and 0.10 ± 0.05 mm, respectively (p = 0.367). Conversely, area, angle and depth of ESL in SES group were significantly greater than those in EES group (0.20 ± 0.39 vs. 0.03 ± 0.09 mm², p < 0.001, 56.2 ± 59.1° vs. 20.1 ± 41.9°, p < 0.001, 0.10 ± 0.09 vs. 0.03 ± 0.03 mm, p < 0.001). OCT showed that the efficacy of neointimal growth suppression is similar between SES and EES, whereas the adverse vascular response after EES implantation is smaller than that after SES implantation.     

采用光学相干断层成像技术评价国产雷帕霉素洗脱支架术内膜覆盖情况

Objective:Confirming complete neointimal coverage after implantation of drug-eluting stent(DES)is clinically important because incomplete stent coverage is maybe responsible for late thrombosis and sudden cardiac death.Optical coherence tomography(OCT)is a high-resolution(≈10 μm)imaging technique capable of detecting a thin layer of neointimal hyperplasia(NIH)inside DES.Helios stent system(KinheIy Bio-tech Co(Shenzhen).Ltd)is a new generation of sirolimus eluting stents.Methods:Motorized optical coherence t...     

In-Vivo Vascular Healing Following Bifurcation Interventions with the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold

BackgroundLong-term vascular healing, evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histology, following complex bifurcation interventions with polymeric Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) has not been previously described.MethodsFifteen New-Zealand-White rabbits (4.0 ± 0.3 kg) underwent stenting of non-diseased aorto-iliac bifurcations with BVS using provisional stenting (PS, n = 2), culotte stenting (n = 7) and modified-T (n = 6) stenting techniques. At 18 months angiography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histology were performed.ResultsThe acute angiographic results were excellent. Three rabbits succumbed acutely due to anaesthetic and renal complications, whilst one was euthanized electively at 4 months for a skin infection. At 18 months, 11 rabbits (PS (2), modified-T (4) and culotte (5)) underwent angiography, revealing excellent results, followed by OCT and histological evaluation. No acute scaffold thrombosis occurred. All non-bifurcation segments revealed complete endothelialisation with excellent healing characteristics on OCT and histology. Following one PS and all 2-stent techniques, uncovered, deformed and malapposed struts were present at the neocarina with adherent fibrin and chronic thrombus in 10/11 cases, extending as long fibrin strands (mean length 11.0 ± 8.3 mm) in 3 culotte and 1 modified-T cases. Late intraluminal scaffold discontinuity was present following five 2-stent cases.ConclusionsPathological vascular healing with uncovered, distorted and malapposed neocarinal struts with adherent strands of chronic thrombus, suggest that exposed polymeric breakdown products may be thrombogenic and caution against the use of polymeric BVS in interventions when there is a chance of suboptimal results with strut malapposition or compromise of scaffold integrity.     

Optical coherence tomography analysis of the stent strut and prediction of resolved strut malapposition at 3 months after 2nd-generation drug-eluting stent implantation

Our objective was to clarify whether thrombogenic problems with stent struts are resolved at 3 months after 2nd-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. Twenty-one patients with stable angina pectoris having 28 (22 zotarolimus-eluting, 6 everolimus-eluting) stents with optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were evaluated. Stent strut coverage and malapposition were evaluated by OCT immediately after PCI and at 3-month follow-up. Acute strut malapposition was observed in 26 out of 28 analyzed stents (92.9 %). At 3-month follow-up, 7 (26.9 %) of those 26 stents with strut malapposition were completely resolved, and the mean percentages of uncovered struts and malapposed struts were 8.3 and 2.0 % when analyzed by each individual stent. When analyzing a total of 30,060 struts, 807 struts (2.7 %) demonstrated acute strut malapposition. Among these, 219 struts (27.1 %) demonstrated persistent strut malapposition. On the basis of receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, a strut-to-vessel (S-V) distance ≤160 µm on post-stenting OCT images was the corresponding cutoff point for resolved malapposed struts (sensitivity 78.1 %, specificity 62.8 %, area under the curve 0.758). The S-V distance of persistent malapposed struts on post-stenting OCT images was longer than that of resolved malapposed struts (235 ± 112 vs. 176 ± 93 µm, p < 0.01). At 3 months after PCI, the prevalence rates of uncovered and malapposed struts were relatively low in 2nd-generation drug-eluting stent. Our results suggest that OCT-guide PCI with an S-V distance ≤160 µm may be recommended especially in patients with planed short-term DAPT.     

Impact of drug-eluting balloon (pre- or post-) dilation on neointima formation in de novo lesions treated by bare-metal stent: the IN-PACT CORO trial

The efficacy of DEB in modifying the high restenosis risk associated with BMS implantation is doubtful. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) may allow precise assessment of neointimal formation after stent implantation. We performed a single-center, prospective, 1:2 randomized trial comparing BMS implantation alone (BMS group) vs. additional DEB (DEB group). DEB patients were further randomized 1:1 to DEB before stenting (pre-DEB group), or after stenting (post-DEB group). Primary endpoint was OCT-assessed neointimal hyperplasia (expressed both as mean in-stent neointimal area and as percentage obstruction of the mean stent area) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of uncovered and malapposed stent struts. Thirty patients were enrolled and randomized to BMS (n = 10), pre-DEB (n = 10), post-DEB (n = 10). At 6-month OCT follow-up, DEB significantly reduced neointimal area compared with BMS: mean neointimal area 2.01 ± 0.89 vs. 3.03 ± 1.07 mm² (p = 0.02), percentage area obstruction 24.56 ± 12.50 vs. 37.51 ± 12.26 % (p = 0.02). The percentage of uncovered and malapposed stent struts did not differ significantly between BMS and DEB. In the comparison between pre-DEB and post-DEB, no significant difference was observed for both primary and secondary endpoints. In de novo coronary lesions treated with BMS, DEB use could be associated with a mild reduction in neointimal hyperplasia at 6 months; this effect could be unrelated to the timing of DEB dilation (pre- or post-stenting).Clinical Trial Registration Information: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01057563.     

Early Strut Coverage in Patients Receiving Drug-Eluting Stents and its Implications for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Randomized Trial

Objectives

This study sought to measure early strut coverage in patients receiving drug-eluting stents (DESs) and to explore the feasibility of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) based on the degree of early strut coverage.

Intravascular ultrasound insights from the Cobalt Chromium Stent With Antiproliferative for Restenosis II (COSTAR II) trial comparing CoStar and Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents

BackgroundDedicated IVUS analyses of the second CObalt chromium STent with Antiproliferative for Restenosis (COSTAR II) trial have not been documented. We aim to compare IVUS findings between CoStar paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and Taxus PES in patients enrolled in the COSTAR II trial. We also attempted to examine the possible regional impact of multiple stenting.Methods and materialsAmong the 1700 patients enrolled, 238 were assigned to an IVUS cohort including 168 patients treated by provisional multiple stenting. At 9 months, qualitative and quantitative IVUS observations including incomplete stent apposition (ISA) and neointimal proliferation (neointimal obstruction: neointimal volume/stent volume ×100) were compared between CoStar and Taxus PESs.ResultsIn qualitative analysis, late-acquired ISA was observed in 1 patient treated by Taxus PES. Impaired strut continuity suggestive of stent fracture was observed in 2 out of 33 patients treated by multiple CoStar, and 4 out of 21 patients treated by multiple Taxus (P=.14). No such findings were found in single-stented patients in either stent subset. Quantitative analysis showed greater neointimal obstruction in CoStar (19.7%±13.4%, n=52) than in Taxus (10.7%±9.9%, n=38), whereas no significant difference in neointimal obstruction was found between single and multiple stenting in either CoStar or Taxus PES.ConclusionsThe CoStar PES exhibits greater neointimal proliferation compared with Taxus PES at 9 months but with similar qualitative outcomes including late-acquired ISA. IVUS findings suggestive of stent fracture were found only in multiple-stenting cases irrespective of the stent used.