Template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in gynecologic cancers: A single institutional experience

PurposeTo report the outcome and toxicities of radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer undergoing inadvertent surgery, vault cancers, and vaginal cancers at our institution.Methods and MaterialsBetween January 2000 and December 2008, 113 patients (37 patients of cervical cancer post-inadvertent surgery, 57 patients with vault cancers, and 19 patients with primary vaginal cancers) were treated with Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template brachytherapy boost after EBRT. The median EBRT dose was 50 Gy, median ISBT dose was 20 Gy, whereas median total dose was 73 Gy equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction in all three groups.ResultsMedian followup of surviving patients for the whole group was 43 months (interquartile range, 19–67 months). The 3-year actuarial disease-free survival and overall survival for three groups was 61%, 61%, 59% and 64%, 64%, and 56%, respectively. Grade III/IV rectal toxicity was seen in 11 (10%) patients, bladder toxicity in 5 (4.5%) patients, whereas 7 (6%) patients developed Grade III small bowel toxicity. Residual disease at brachytherapy had significant impact on DFS and OS. Other factors such as age, disease volume, parametrial extension, and vaginal extension did not impact the survivals.ConclusionsMartinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template–based high-dose-rate ISBT boost in gynecologic cancer results in a reasonable outcome in terms of survivals with acceptable late toxicities. The use of template-based ISBT is associated with a definite learning curve.     

Outcomes of 3D MRI based HDR brachytherapy with hybrid multichannel vaginal cylinder applicator and freehand needles for treatment of vaginal disease

Freehand needles can be used with multichannel vaginal cylinders (MCVC) to cover vaginal cancer >7 mm thick or with supra-vaginal extension. We report our institutional outcomes using this novel hybrid technique.Patients with vaginal malignancies treated with HDR BT using MCVC plus freehand needles from 2014-2021 at our institution were identified. Clinical characteristics, details of brachytherapy, initial response, and overall local control (LC) outcomes were recorded. LC was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier method.34 patients were identified with median follow-up 1.9 years. 19 patients had primary endometrial cancer with vaginal recurrence/disease, and remaining had primary vaginal cancer or other primaries. 7 patients had recurrence after previous RT course. 25 patients received EBRT with median dose 45 Gy in 25 fractions, and rest received BT alone. Median HR-CTV D90 for patients treated with EBRT plus BT was 77.4 Gy.30 patients had complete local response to BT on initial examination and/or follow-up imaging. 1 and 2-year LC rates in patients without prior RT treated with EBRT + BT were 94.1% and 94.1%, respectively. 1 and 2-year LC rates for those without prior RT were 88.1% and 76.4%, respectively. 1 and 2-year LC rates for those with prior RT were 68.6% and 34.3%, respectively. 1 patient had vaginal laceration requiring surgical repair, and 1 patient developed small bowel obstruction 1 month after BT, with no additional acute grade 3+ toxicities identified.Our approach with MCVC plus freehand needles with MRI-based planning was feasible and safe, with excellent initial local response and low rate of serious toxicities.     

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies

PURPOSE: The study aimed to assess the outcome of locally advanced cervical and vaginal cancer treated with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDRB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2004, 16 previously unirradiated patients with locally advanced cervical and vaginal cancer not suitable for intracavitary brachytherapy because of distorted anatomy or extensive vaginal disease were treated with HDRB in combination with external beam radiotherapy. All patients received whole pelvis external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by interstitial implantation. The median whole pelvis external beam dose was 45 Gy (range, 39.6-50.4 Gy) with 11 patients receiving parametrial boost to a median dose of 9 Gy. Twelve (75%) of these patients received chemotherapy concurrent with external beam. All patients received a single HDRB procedure using a modified Syed-Neblett template. A CT scan was performed postimplant for needle placement verification and treatment planning purpose. Dose was prescribed to the tumor volume based on the radiographic and clinical examination. All patients received 18.75 Gy in five fractions delivered twice daily. The median followup was 25 months (6-69 months). RESULTS: Median cumulative biologic effective dose (EBRT+HDRB) to tumor volume was 78.9 Gy10 with the range of 72.5-85.2Gy10. Median cumulative biologic effective dose for the rectum and bladder were 99.4 Gy3 (range, 79.6-107.8 Gy3) and 96.4 Gy3 (range, 78.3-105.3 Gy3), respectively. Complete response was achieved in 13 (81%) patients with 3 patients having persistent disease. Five of these 13 patients developed recurrence at a median time of 14 months (distant in 4 and local and distant in 1). The 5-year actuarial local control and cause-specific survival were 75% and 64%, respectively. In subset analysis, 5-year actuarial local control was 63% for cervical cancer patients and 100% for vaginal cancer patients. No patient had acute Grade 3 or 4 morbidity. Grade 3 or 4 delayed morbidity resulting from treatment occurred in 1 patient with 5-year actuarial rate of 7%. Three patients had late Grade 2 rectal morbidity and 1 patient had Grade 2 small bowel morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Our series suggests that single interstitial implantation procedure with five fractions of 3.75 Gy each to target volume is an effective and safe fractionation schedule. The integration of imaging modality helps in decreasing dose to the critical organs. Additional patients and followup are ongoing to determine the long-term efficacy of this approach.     

Perianal mucinous carcinoma successfully treated with a combination of external beam radiotherapy and high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy

The case of an 84-year-old man with perianal mucinous carcinoma is presented. The tumour was 6 cm in diameter and extended into the surrounding tissues. Taking the patient's advanced age and disease into account, rectosigmoidectomy and colostomy were carried out without resection of most of the tumour. Radiotherapy consisted of pre-operative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) of 40 Gy in 20 fractions, post-operative EBRT of 24 Gy in 12 fractions, and high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy of 12 Gy in a single fraction. The patient tolerated the entire course of radiotherapy well. The patient is doing well without regrowth or complications 7 years after radiotherapy. To our knowledge, there have been no reports on the successful outcome of radiotherapy for perianal mucinous carcinoma. This case suggests that a combination of EBRT plus interstitial brachytherapy boost may play a role in the definitive treatment of perianal mucinous carcinoma.     

Radiotherapy doses at special reference points correlate with the outcome of cervical cancer therapy

PURPOSE: The authors analyzed the correlation between radiotherapy doses at reference points on the uterine edge and the rectal wall and both pelvic control and late rectal complications of cervical cancer therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1997 and 2005, 57 patients with Stages IB-IVA cancer of uterine cervix were treated with a combination of external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy. Their high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy was planned by dose-point optimization at six dose points located on the edge of uterus by computed tomography. A rectal reference point located on the anterior wall of the rectum by computed tomography was also used. The pelvic control rate and the rate of late rectal complications were calculated according to the biologically effective dose (BED) at each point and several clinical parameters. RESULTS: The overall 3-year pelvic control rate was 69.4%. The patients with a BED >80 Gy10 at the point on the edge of the uterine cervix had better pelvic control (78.4% at 3 years) than the patients with a BED < or =80 Gy10 (54.4% at 3 years), and the difference was significant. The difference in the BED (Gy3) at the rectal reference point between the patients with Grade 0-1 late rectal complications (median, 114 Gy) and the patients who developed Grade > or =2 late rectal complications (median, 178 Gy) was significant. Chemotherapy was a borderline significant parameter in regard to correlation with pelvic control and late rectal complications, but there were no correlations with other dosimetric or clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The radiotherapy dose at the reference point on the edge of the cervix affected pelvic control more than the clinical parameters, and the dose at the rectal reference point was more strongly correlated with the occurrence of late rectal complications.     

Localized prostate cancer with intermediate- or high-risk features treated with combined external beam radiotherapy and iodine-125 seed brachytherapy

ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to compare the results of the combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy vs. brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer treatment in patients with intermediate and high risk of disease recurrence.Methods and MaterialsNinety-six patients were treated from January 1998 to December 2006. Twenty-four patients received combined treatment and 72 patients received brachytherapy alone. Patients were classified into intermediate or high risk of recurrence according to the D’Amico’s classification. The prescribed dose for brachytherapy was 145 Gy as monotherapy and 110 Gy for combined treatment. The dose of EBRT was 45 Gy over 5 weeks, with 1.8 Gy daily fractions. Results were analyzed based on Phoenix definition of biochemical recurrence, that is, nadir plus 2 ng/mL.ResultsBiochemical control was achieved by 96% (23 of 24) of patients receiving combined treatment and by 72% (52 of 72) in the group treated by brachytherapy alone (p < 0.015). The addition of EBRT resulted in a 94% biochemical disease-free survival at 5 years; and in brachytherapy alone group, the rate was 54% (p < 0.011). Mean followup was 96 months (24–132 months; confidence interval 95%: 90–102).ConclusionThis study shows that in patients with localized prostate cancer, with intermediate and high risk of biochemical recurrence, the addition of EBRT can confer a significant biochemical control advantage when added to brachytherapy.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with long-term hormonal therapy for high-risk prostate cancer: results of a retrospective analysis

Purpose High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hormonal therapy (HTx), without the addition of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for high-risk prostate cancer was evaluated retrospectively. Materials and Methods Between May 1995 and April 2002, 35 patients with prostate cancer [Stage≥T2b (UICC 1997) or tumor grading=3 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level≥20 ng/mL] were treated with HDR brachytherapy combined with HTx. Most patients (74%) had two or more of these factors. All patients received Iridium-192 HDR brachytherapy with a total dose of 54 Gy/9 fractions/5 days (48 Gy/8 fractions/5 days for the first 6 cases) in one implant session. The median neoadjuvant HTx [luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist and antiandrogen] period was 7 months. The median adjuvant HTx (ATH) (LH-RH agonist) period was 40 months, and median follow-up was 57 months (range, 23–117 months). Results The 5-year actuarial biochemical control, local control, and disease-free rates were 62%, 96%, and 76% respectively. No patients experienced local and/or regional relapse without distant progression. The 5-year actuarial cause-specific survival and overall survival rates were 89% and 87%, respectively. The acute and late toxicity were moderate and well tolerated. Conclusion HDR brachytherapy plus long-term HTx is at least as effective as conventional EBRT plus long-term HTx.     

High-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in previously irradiated patients

PurposePreoperative high-dose-rate (HDR) endorectal brachytherapy is well tolerated among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, these studies excluded patients who previously received pelvic radiation therapy (RT). Because a favorable toxicity profile has been published for HDR endorectal brachytherapy, we evaluated this technique in patients who have previously received pelvic irradiation.Methods and MaterialsWe included patients who had received pelvic irradiation for a previous pelvic malignancy and later received preoperative HDR endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer. Brachytherapy was delivered to a total dose of 26 Gy in 4 consecutive daily 6.5 Gy fractions.ResultsWe evaluated 10 patients who previously received pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone (n=6), EBRT and brachytherapy (n=2), or brachytherapy alone (n=2). The median interval between the initial course of RT and endorectal brachytherapy was approximately 11 years (range, 1-19 years). Two patients experienced a complete pathologic response while 1 patient had a near complete pathologic response. No acute grade ≥3 toxicity was observed. No intraoperative or postoperative surgical complications were observed.ConclusionsPreoperative HDR endorectal brachytherapy is an alternative to EBRT for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have previously received pelvic RT.     

Primary Radiotherapy of Stage IIA/B–IIIB Cervical Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive literature on cervical cancer demonstrates, even today, the need for optimization of the timing of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in the treatment of stage IIA/B-IIIB cervical carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 210 patients with carcinoma of the cervix were treated in the Municipal Center of Oncoradiology between January 1991 and December 1996 (FIGO IIA: n = 10, FIGO IIB: n = 113, and FIGO IIIB: n = 87). Two regimens were compared: sequential radiation therapy (SRT) with 4 x 8 Gy HDR-BT to point A followed by EBRT, and continuous radiation therapy (CRT) in which 5 x 6 Gy HDR-BT to point A, one session per week, was integrated into the EBRT. A total dose of 68-70 Gy to point A and 52-54 Gy to point B was given in EBRT with SRT, five fractions per week were applied. Four fractions per week were applied in CRT, i. e., no EBRT was performed on the day of HDR-BT. Total doses to points A and B were identical in both regimens. Overall treatment time (OTT) amounted to 56 days for SRT and 35 days for CRT. Median follow-up time was 3.4 (2.5-4.2) years. RESULTS: Progression-free 5-year-survival (PFS) was 71% in the CRT and 56% in the SRT group. Nevertheless, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 1.00), and the same was found in a subgroup analysis of the different tumor stages, showing, however, an unequivocal trend. Late bladder and rectal injuries occurred in 13% and 25%, respectively. Late rectal injuries were significantly more frequent with SRT than CRT (35 patients in the SRT and 18 patients in the CRT group; p = 0.037). This was due to the higher doses per fraction of HDR-BT in the SRT group. No difference was found regarding late bladder injuries (p = 0.837). CONCLUSION: For the patients included in this study, no advantage has been found so far in using CRT, i. e., shortening the OTT by weekly integration of HDR-BT into EBRT. Nevertheless, an obvious trend exists. The dose of 8 Gy per fraction of HDR-BT in the SRT regimen was obviously too high. To achieve a significant improvement in local control and disease-free survival (DFS) as well as overall survival (OS), the combination with modern chemotherapy regimens and regional deep hyperthermia may rather be the treatment option.     

A prospective study of radical external beam radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy combined with intraluminal brachytherapy for primary esophageal cancer

PURPOSEThis study compared the efficacy and side effects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) with EBRT alone in patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODSBetween 2013 and 2020, 64 patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer without surgery received radiotherapy. Thirty-two patients received EBRT + IBT. EBRT dose was 50 Gy, 2 Gy/f, 5 times a week, and IBT dose was 10 Gy, 5 Gy/f, once a week. Thirty-two patients received EBRT alone, and the total dose was 60 Gy. The median followup was 19 months.RESULTSThe local control rates (LCR) of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment were 88% and 72%, 53% and 22%, 25%, and 9%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) of the EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 3 years after treatment were 38% and 9%. The 3-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group were 25% and 9%. Univariate analysis showed that EBRT + IBT could be the prognostic factor improving OS (p = 0.04), and tumor located in the mid-thoracic region exhibited a poorer prognosis on LRFS (p = 0.03). Grade 3 or higher acute side effects included two cases of dysphagia and three cases of bone marrow suppression. Severe late side effects included three cases of fistula, three cases of radiation pneumonia, and five cases of stenosis requiring treatment.CONCLUSIONSCompared with EBRT alone, EBRT + IBT is an effective treatment modality for T1～3NanyM0 primary thoracic esophageal cancer with good local control. It can prolong the survival time of patients and has acceptable toxicity.     

Role of brachytherapy in stage III endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: Identifying factors predictive of a survival benefit

OBJECTIVESTo determine which patients with stage III endometrial cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy derive benefit from the addition of vaginal brachytherapy, as stage III is a highly heterogeneous population with substantial variations in practice.METHODSPatients with FIGO stage III endometrial carcinoma diagnosed 2004–2016 who underwent at least total hysterectomy and adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival according to receipt of brachytherapy, stratified by histologic type, pathological features, and status of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariable regression.RESULTSIn total, 9369 patients were identified (24% stage IIIA, 5% stage IIIB, 71% stage IIIC; 61% endometrioid, 39% nonendometrioid histology), and 28% received brachytherapy. In the endometrioid cohort, brachytherapy was associated with a 5% absolute increase in 3-year overall survival (87% vs. 82%, p < 0.0001), which persisted in multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.84, p < 0.0001). The benefit of brachytherapy was greater in patients not also receiving EBRT, and in patients with vaginal/parametrial extension, grade 3 disease, lymphovascular invasion, and/or deep myometrial invasion. In the nonendometrioid cohort, brachytherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in univariable but not multivariable analysis, regardless of EBRT status or pathological features.CONCLUSIONSFactors predictive of brachytherapy benefit were endometrioid histology and pathological risk factors for local recurrence. Additionally, brachytherapy appeared more beneficial in patients not already receiving pelvic EBRT. Further research is warranted to determine which stage III patients may be best served by brachytherapy, EBRT, or both.     

Comparison between In Vivo Dosimetry and Barium Contrast Technique for Prediction of Rectal Complications in High-Dose-Rate Intracavitary Radiotherapy in Cervix Cancer Patients

Purpose: To investigate the correlation between late rectal complications and rectal dose in cervix cancer patients treated with high-dose-rate intracavitary radiotherapy (HDR ICR) and to analyze factors reducing rectal complications. Patients and Methods: A total of 136 patients with cervix cancer who were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and HDR ICR from 1995 to 1999 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy (RT) consisted of EBRT plus HDR ICR. The median EBRT dose was 50.4 Gy, and midline block was done after 30-50 Gy of EBRT. A total of six fractions of HDR ICR with 4 Gy fraction size each were applied twice per week to the A point. The rectal dose was calculated at the rectal reference point using the barium contrast criteria. In vivo measurement of the rectal dose was performed with thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) during HDR ICR. The median follow-up period was 26 months (range 6-60 months). Results: A total of 16 patients (12%) experienced rectal bleeding, which occurred 4-33 months (median 11 months) after the completion of RT. The calculated rectal doses did not differ in patients with rectal bleeding and those without, but the measured rectal doses were higher in affected patients. The differences of the measured ICR fractional rectal dose, ICR total rectal dose, and total rectal biologically equivalent dose (BED) were statistically significant. When the measured ICR total rectal dose exceeded 16 Gy, the ratio of the measured rectal dose to A point dose was > 70%; when the measured rectal BED exceeded 110 Gy₃, a high possibility of late rectal complications could be found. Conclusion: In vivo dosimetry using TLD during HDR ICR was a good predictor of late rectal complications. Hence, if data from in vivo dosimetry shows any possibility of rectal bleeding, efforts should be made to reduce the rectal dose. Ziel: Untersuchung der Korrelation zwischen Spätnebenwirkungen am Rektum und der rektalen Dosis bei Patientinnen mit Zervixkarzinom, die mit intrakavitärer Brachytherapie (HDR-ICR) behandelt wurden, sowie Analyse der Faktoren, die rektale Komplikationen reduzieren. Patienten und Methodik: Es wurde eine retrospektive Analyse von insgesamt 136 Patientinnen mit Zervixkarzinom durchgeführt, die im Zeitraum von 1995 bis 1999 mit perkutaner Strahlentherapie (EBRT) and HDR-ICR behandelt wurden. Die mittlere externe Dosis betrug 50,4 Gy, wobei ein Mittellinienblock nach 30-50 Gy der EBRT eingesetzt wurde. Die insgesamt sechs Fraktionen der HDR-ICR wurden zweimal pro Woche mit jeweils 4 Gy am Punkt A appliziert. Die rektale Dosis wurde unter Verwendung der Bariumkontrastkriterien am rektalen Referenzpunkt berechnet. In-vivo-Messungen der rektalen Dosis erfolgten mit Hilfe eines Thermolumineszenzdosimeters (TLD) während der HDR-ICR. Der mittlere Nachsorgezeitraum betrug 26 Monate (6-60 Monate). Ergebnisse: Insgesamt 16 Patientinnen (12%) klagten über rektale Blutungen, die innerhalb von 4-33 Monaten (im Mittel 11 Monate) nach Abschluss der RT auftraten. Die berechnete rektale Dosis unterschied sich nicht zwischen Patientinnen mit und ohne rektale Blutungen, jedoch waren die gemessenen rektalen Dosen bei den betroffenen Patientinnen höher. Die Unterschiede zwischen der gemessenen Einzeldosis am Rektum, der Gesamtdosis am Rektum und der biologisch äquivalenten Gesamtdosis (BED) am Rektum waren statistisch signifikant. Überschritt die gemessene Gesamtdosis der Brachytherapie 16 Gy, betrug das Verhältnis von gemessener rektaler Dosis zur Dosis am A-Punkt > 70%. Bei einer gemessenen BED > 110 Gy₃ bestand eine hohe Wahrscheinlichkeit für späte rektale Nebenwirkungen. Schlussfolgerung: Die In-vivo-Dosimetrie mit TLD hat sich als guter Prädiktor von Spätnebenwirkungen am Rektum erwiesen. Falls In-vivo-Dosimetriewerte ein Risiko späterer Proktitis anzeigen, sollte die Rektumdosis reduziert werden.     

Long-term outcome for prostate cancer using pseudo pulse–dosed rate brachytherapy,external beam radiotherapy,and hormones

PurposeWe report the long-term outcomes of pulse-dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy used in a nonstandard style (pseudo-PDR) with an high-dose rate brachytherapy technique in conjunction with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and hormonal manipulation on prostate cancer (PC).Methods and MaterialsWe treated 253 patients with Stage T1–T3 N0M0 PC, between December 1999 and March 2006. All patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation for a median 6 months. Treatment consisted of three pulses of pseudo-PDR brachytherapy to a median dose of 18 Gy with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions of EBRT.ResultsAt a median 6 years followup, (range, 1–11 years), 5-year overall survival was 92%, and PC-specific survival was 96%. The 5-year biochemical control (biochemical no evidence of disease) by the Phoenix definition for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 95%, 90%, and 71%, respectively (p < 0.00001). At 6 years, the incidence of Radiotherapy Oncology Group Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicity was 1% and 6%; Radiotherapy Oncology Group Grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was 4% and 0%. Erectile preservation at 3 years was 58%. The Phoenix definition best predicted clinical failure with a high specificity (94%).ConclusionsPseudo-PDR brachytherapy plus EBRT with limited neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation is an effective treatment option in localized PC, with minimal and tolerable morbidity and provides excellent control. This technique of a modified PDR-delivery technique appears as effective as high-dose rate therapy.     

Comparison of outcomes using radiotherapy or brachytherapy after resection of primary adenoid cystic carcinoma in oral and maxillofacial regions

We wished to investigate the outcome of surgery combined with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy (¹²⁵I seeds) for the treatment of primary adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the oral and maxillofacial region. Data of patients with primary ACC were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into EBRT and brachytherapy groups. Wide tumor excision was done to achieve negative margins. Standard radiotherapy in the EBRT group was 60 Gy. A treatment-planning system was used to create implantation plans with a prescribed dose of 60–120 Gy and ¹²⁵I seeds were implanted postoperatively. Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests were used to analyze local control and survival. The median duration of followup was 66.1 and 46.8 months for the EBRT group and brachytherapy group, respectively. There was no significant difference in local control, control of metastasis to regional lymph nodes, or control of distant metastasis between the two groups. There was no significant difference in overall survival, disease-specific survival, or disease-free survival in the two groups at 3 years and 5 years. The prevalence of complications in the brachytherapy group was lower than that in the EBRT group. Both methods elicited good treatment effects, but the prevalence of adverse events was lower in the brachytherapy group.     

Clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer

PurposeTo report prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival and treatment-related toxicity outcomes after combining high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.Methods and MaterialsBetween 1998 and 2009, 229 patients were treated with HDR brachytherapy followed 3 weeks later by supplemental EBRT. The HDR brachytherapy boost consisted of three fractions of ¹⁹²Ir (5.5–7.5 Gy per fraction), and EBRT consisted of intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivering an additional 45.0–50.4 Gy directed to the prostate gland and seminal vesicles. Median follow-up was 61 months.ResultsSeven-year PSA relapse-free survival for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were 95%, 90%, and 57%, respectively (p < 0.001). Among high-risk patients treated with biological equivalent doses in excess of 190 Gy, 7-year PSA relapse-free survival was 81%. In multivariate analysis, Gleason scores of ≥8 predicted for increased risk of biochemical failure, whereas the use of short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy did not influence tumor-control outcomes even among intermediate- or high-risk patients. Seven-year incidence of distant metastases for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were 5%, 3%, and 17%, respectively. Seven-year incidence of late Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicities were 22.1% and 4.9%, respectively and the 7-year incidence of Grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicities were 1% and 0.4%, respectively.ConclusionHDR prostate brachytherapy in conjunction with supplemental EBRT results in excellent biochemical relapse-free survival rates with a low incidence of severe late genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities. The use of short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation did not influence long-term biochemical tumor control in this cohort.     

Designing equivalent treatment regimens for prostate radiotherapy based on equivalent uniform dose

The purpose of this work was to determine alternative radiotherapy (RT) regimens that are biologically equivalent to clinically proven treatments using different RT modalities or different fractionation schemes. The concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) is used with the linear quadratic model to determine equivalent treatment regimens using two representative sets of parameters derived from clinical data: (i) alpha/beta = 3.1 Gy and alpha = 0.15 Gy(-1), and (ii) alpha/beta = 1.5 Gy and alpha = 0.04 Gy(-1). The EUD values for the critical structure (rectum) are also calculated. Representative dose volume histograms were used to account for dose inhomogeneities for different RT modalities. A series of alternative and equivalent fractionation regimens that can be used with different radiotherapy modalities for localized prostate cancer were determined. For example, the alternative regimens, calculated with the alpha/beta ratio of 3.1 Gy, that would be biologically equivalent to external beam RT (EBRT) of 76 Gy (38x2.0 Gy) include: EBRT hypofractionation of 21x3.0 Gy; I-125 implant of 156 Gy; Pd-103 implant of 128 Gy; high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy of 4x10.5 Gy; I-125 implant of 65 Gy combined with EBRT of 23x2.0 Gy; and HDR brachytherapy of 3x5.9 Gy combined with EBRT of 23x2.0 Gy. Similar data for other parameters are also presented. With caution, the data presented may be useful in designing clinical trials to explore new RT strategies, such as image-guided intensity-modulated RT.     

Comparison of dose delivered to vagina using two different intracavitary brachytherapy applicators for carcinoma cervix

PURPOSEThe aim of the study was to compare the dose to vaginal points between two intracavitary applicators used for HDR brachytherapy in Carcinoma CervixMETHODS AND MATERIALSPatients reporting to our center for Carcinoma cervix intracavitary brachytherapy were randomly allocated to treatment with either Manchester or Fletcher Suit Delclos (FSD) applicator. All patients received an EBRT dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions along with weekly Cisplatin (40 mg/m²). Brachytherapy was administered using CT based planning. All patients received a dose of 7 Gy to Point A one week apart for a total of three fractions. For vaginal dose reporting, the PIBS points (PIBS, PIBS+1, PIBS+2, PIBS-1, PIBS-2) and dose to vagina at the level of ovoids was compared between the two applicatorsRESULTSA total of 30 Carcinoma cervix patients were randomly allocated to receive intracavitary brachytherapy with either Manchester or FSD applicator. The mean vaginal reference length for patients treated with Manchester applicator was 4.3 and for patients treated with FSD applicator was 4.4. On analyzing dose to different vaginal points, patients treated with Manchester applicator received significantly higher mean and median doses to all PIBS points (except PIBS-2 cm) as compared to FSD applicator. On analyzing dose to the upper vagina at the level of the ovoids, the Manchester applicator delivered higher antero-posterior doses as compared to FSD applicator.CONCLUSIONSManchester applicator gives higher dose to the vagina as compared to FSD applicator for intracavitary brachytherapy in Carcinoma Cervix. The choice of using a particular applicator depends on the residual disease at the time of brachytherapy and patient anatomy