Effects of angiotensin II and its metabolites in the rat coronary vascular bed: is angiotensin III the preferred ligand of the angiotensin AT2 receptor?

Aminopeptidases metabolize angiotensin II to angiotensin-(2-8) (=angiotensin III) and angiotensin-(3-8) (=angiotensin IV), and carboxypeptidases generate angiotensin-(1-7) from angiotensin I and II. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers affect the concentrations of these metabolites, and they may thus contribute to the beneficial effects of these drugs, possibly through stimulation of non-classical angiotensin AT receptors. Here, we investigated the effects of angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) in the rat coronary vascular bed, with or without angiotensin AT1 - or angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor blockade. Results were compared to those in rat iliac arteries and abdominal aortas. Angiotensin II, angiotensin III and angiotensin IV constricted coronary arteries via angiotensin AT1 receptor stimulation, angiotensin III and angiotensin IV being approximately 20- and approximately 8000-fold less potent than angiotensin II. The angiotensin AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 greatly enhanced the constrictor effects of angiotensin III, starting at angiotensin III concentrations in the low nanomolar range. PD123319 enhanced the angiotensin II-induced constriction at submicromolar angiotensin II concentrations only. Angiotensin-(1-7) exerted no effects in the coronary circulation, although, at micromolar concentrations, it blocked angiotensin AT1 receptor-induced constriction. Angiotensin AT2 receptor-mediated relaxation did not occur in iliac arteries and abdominal aortas, and the constrictor effects of the angiotensin metabolites in these vessels were identical to those in the coronary vascular bed. In conclusion, angiotensin AT2 receptor activation in the rat coronary vascular bed results in vasodilation, and angiotensin III rather than angiotensin II is the preferred endogenous agonist of these receptors. Angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) do not exert effects through non-classical angiotensin AT receptors in the rat coronary vascular bed, iliac artery or aorta.     

The kinin B1 receptor antagonist des-Arg9-[Leu8]bradykinin: an antagonist of the angiotensin AT1 receptor which also binds to the AT2 receptor.

1. Agonists and antagonists of kinin B1 and B2 receptors were evaluated in vitro for their effects against angiotensin II (AII)-induced contractile responses in the rabbit aorta and for their binding properties to angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptors from purified membrane of rat liver and lamb uterus respectively. 2. In aortic rings, the kinin B1 receptor antagonist, des-Arg9-[Leu8]bradykinin (BK) (3-100 microM) caused a concentration-dependent decrease in sensitivity and a depression of the maximum response to AII. Des-Arg10-[Leu9]kallidin (KD), des-Arg9-BK, des-Arg10-KD, BK or KD at 3 microM had no effect against AII-induced contractions. 3. Des-Arg9-[Leu8]BK (3 or 100 microM) did not affect contractions of aortic rings to histamine, potassium chloride, endothelin-1, 5-hydroxytryptamine, noradrenaline and the thromboxane A2-mimetic, U46619. 4. Des-Arg9-[Leu8]BK displaced [125I]-Sar1-AII binding to the AT1 subtype in rat liver membranes with a Ki value of 1.1 +/- 0.4 microM. Values of Ki for des-Arg9-BK and KD were 45 +/- 13 microM and 25 +/- 22 microM, respectively. The other kinin derivatives des-Arg10-KD, BK and des-Arg10-[Leu9]KD at concentrations up to 100 microM did not bind to the AT1 receptor. 5. All the kinin derivatives except BK bound to AT2 receptors in lamb uterus membranes. Values of Ki for des-Arg9-[Leu8]BK, des-Arg10-[Leu9]KD, des-Arg9-BK, des-Arg10-KD and KD were 0.3 +/- 0.1, 0.7 +/- 0.1, 1.2 +/- 0.3, 1.5 +/- 0.3 and 7.0 +/- 1.6 microM, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mechanisms underlying the endothelium-independent relaxation induced by angiotensin II in rat aorta

It has been suggested that low concentrations of angiotensin II cause vasoconstriction, whereas high concentrations evoke vasodilation. Thus, this work aimed to characterize functionally the mechanisms underlying angiotensin II-induced relaxation, at high concentration, in isolated rat aortic rings. Vascular reactivity experiments, using standard muscle bath procedures, showed that angiotensin II (1-30 microM) concentration-dependently induces relaxation of phenylephrine-precontracted rings with intact or denuded endothelium. The relaxation was not altered in the presence of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), a nonselective inhibitor of metalloprotease. The selective antagonist of AT2 receptors, PD123319, inhibited angiotensin II-induced relaxation. Conversely, losartan or A-779, selective AT1 and Ang1-7 receptor antagonists, respectively, did not alter the relaxation induced by angiotensin II. HOE-140, a selective antagonist of the bradykinin B2 receptor, and amiloride, a Na+/H+ exchanger inhibitor, abolished angiotensin II-induced relaxation. Administration of exogenous bradykinin on precontracted tissues produced concentration-dependent relaxation, which was also inhibited by HOE-140. Preincubation of denuded-rings with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), indomethacin, or tetraethylammonium (TEA) reduced angiotensin II-induced relaxation. The combination of L-NAME, indomethacin, and TEA completely abolished the relaxation induced by angiotensin II. 4-Aminopyridine (4-AP) as well as charybdotoxin reduced angiotensin II-induced relaxation. On the other hand, neither apamin nor glibenclamide altered the relaxation induced by angiotensin II. The major new finding of this work is that it demonstrated functionally the existence of AT2 receptors located on smooth muscle of rat aortic rings that mediated vasorelaxation via stimulation of B2 receptors by bradykinin, which in turns results in the activation of the NO-cGMP pathway, vasodilator cyclooxygenase product(s), and voltage-dependent and Ca+-activated large-conductance K+ channels.     

Chronic hypotensive effects of losartan are not dependent on the actions of angiotensin II at AT 2 receptors.

We have previously demonstrated the chronic hypotensive effects of the AT1 antagonist, losartan, in normotensive, salt-replete rats. One explanation for this response is a reduction in vascular resistance due to blockade of AT1 receptors. Another explanation is that increases in angiotensin II levels during losartan administration can bind to AT2 receptors. Studies suggest that binding of angiotensin II at AT2 receptors lowers arterial pressure by vasodilation. We hypothesized that the chronic effects of losartan are mediated by activation of angiotensin II effects at AT2 receptors. We tested this hypothesis by infusing the AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123319 (74 mg/kg/day), in conjunction with losartan (10 mg/kg/day) for 10 days in rats and compared the hypotensive response in rats treated with losartan alone. After 6 days of treatment, arterial pressure decreased similarly in losartan (-21 +/- 2 mm Hg) and losartan+PD123319 (-23 +/- 2 mm Hg) treated rats. However, by day 10 of the infusion, arterial pressure had decreased to a greater extent (p < 0.05) in rats treated with losartan and PD123319 (-31 +/- 2 mm Hg) compared with rats treated with losartan alone (-22 +/- 2 mm Hg). We conclude that the hypotensive effects of losartan are not dependent on the actions of angiotensin II at AT 2 receptors in normotensive, salt-replete rats.     

Ability of angiotensin II to modulate striatal dopamine release via the AT1 receptor in vitro and in vivo.

1. The ability of angiotensin II to modulate dopamine release from rat striatal slices in vitro and in the intact rat striatum in vivo was assessed by the microdialysis technique. 2. In slices of rat striatum, angiotensin II (0.1-1.0 microM) induced a concentration-related increase in endogenous dopamine release which was maximal (approximately 250% above basal levels) within the first 2-4 min of agonist application and subsequently declined to near basal values. The angiotensin II-induced increase in dopamine release was Ca(2+)-dependent and was completely antagonized by the selective AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan (1.0 microM). In contrast, the AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123177 (1.0 microM) failed to modify the angiotensin II-induced response. Neither antagonist alone modified basal dopamine release from striatal slices. 3. In freely moving rats, angiotensin II (1.0-10 microM; administered via the microdialysis probe) induced a concentration-related increase in extracellular levels of dopamine which was maximal (approximately 150% above basal levels) within 20-40 min of agonist application and subsequently declined. The angiotensin II (10 microM)-induced increase in extracellular levels of dopamine was completely antagonized by the AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan (0.1-1.0 microM; administered via the microdialysis probe) but not by the AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123177 (1.0 microM; administered via the microdialysis probe). Neither antagonist alone modified basal extracellular levels of dopamine. 4. Homogenate radioligand binding studies with [125I]-angiotensin II (0.1 nm) identified relatively low levels of specific binding sites in rat striatal homogenates compared to homogenates of pyriform cortex (51.3 +/- 9.2 and 651.3 +/- 55.1 fmol g-1 wet weight, respectively, mean +/- s.e.mean, n = 3; non-specific binding defined by unlabelled angiotensin II). The majority of the specific [125I]-angiotensin II (0.1 nM) binding in the striatal and pyriform cortex homogenates was sensitive to the selective AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan (1.0 microM). 5. In conclusions the present study provides direct evidence that angiotensin II acting via the AT1 receptor subtype facilitates the release of dopamine in the rat striatum in vitro and in vivo. This receptor-mediated response may account for the modulation of dopamine-mediated behavioural responses by antagonists of the AT1 receptor and inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme.     

The role of bradykinin, AT2 and angiotensin 1-7 receptors in the EDRF-dependent vasodilator effect of angiotensin II on the isolated mesenteric vascular bed of the rat

1. The mechanisms involved in the vasodilator actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) have not yet been completely elucidated. We investigated the potential mechanisms that seem to be involved in the Ang II vasodilator effect using rat isolated mesenteric vascular bed (MVB). 2. Under basal conditions, Ang II does not affect the perfusion pressure of MVB. However, in vessels precontracted with norepinephrine, Ang II induces vasodilation followed by vasoconstriction. Vasoconstrictor, but not the vasodilation of Ang II, is inhibited by AT(1) antagonist (losartan). The vasodilator effect of Ang II was not inhibited by AT(2), angiotensin IV and angiotensin 1-7 receptor antagonists alone (PD 123319, divalinal, A 779, respectively). 3. The vasodilator effect of Ang II is significantly reduced by endothelial removal (deoxycholic acid), but not by indomethacin. Inhibition of NO-synthase by N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) and guanylyl cyclase by 1H-[1,2,3] oxadiazolo [4,4-a] quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ) reduces the vasodilator effect of Ang II. This effect is also reduced by tetraethylammonium (TEA) or l-NAME, and a combination of l-NAME plus TEA increases the inhibitory effect of the antagonists alone. However, indomethacin does not change the residual vasodilator effect observed in vessels pretreated with l-NAME plus TEA. 4. In vessels precontracted with norepinephrine and depolarized with KCl 25 mm or treated with Ca(2+)-dependent K(+) channel blockers (charybdotoxin plus apamin), the effect of Ang II was significantly reduced. However, this effect is not affected by ATP and voltage-dependent K(+) channel blockers (glybenclamide and 4-aminopyridine). 5. Inhibition of kininase II with captopril significantly potentiates the vasodilator effect of bradykinin (BK) and Ang II in the rat MVB. The inhibitory effect of the B(2) receptor antagonist HOE 140 on the vasodilator effect of Ang II is further enhanced by PD 123319 and/or A 779. 6. The present findings suggest that BK plays an important role in the endothelium-dependent vasodilator effect of Ang II. Probably, the link between Ang II and BK release is modulated by receptors that bind PD 123319 and A 779.     

Functional role of angiotensin II AT2 receptor in modulation of AT1 receptor-mediated contraction in rat uterine artery: involvement of bradykinin and nitric oxide

The aim of the present study was to explore the mechanisms underlying angiotensin II AT2 receptor modulation of AT1 receptor-mediated vasoconstriction in the rat isolated uterine artery, since previous studies have suggested that AT2 receptors may oppose AT1 receptor-mediated effects. Segments of uterine artery were obtained from Sprague-Dawley rats and mounted in small vessel myographs. Concentration-response (CR) curves to angiotensin II (0.1 nm-0.1 microM) were constructed in the absence and presence of PD 123319 (AT2 antagonist; 1 microM), HOE 140 (bradykinin B2 antagonist; 0.1 microM), Nomega-nitro-l-arginine (NOLA) (NOS inhibitor; 30 microM), as well as combinations of these inhibitors. Contractile responses to angiotensin II were expressed as a percent of the response to a K+ depolarizing solution. PD 123319 (1 microM) potentiated angiotensin II-induced contractions; reflected by a significant four-fold leftward shift of the angiotensin II CR curve. HOE 140 (0.1 microM) significantly increased the pEC50 of the angiotensin II CR curve. The combination of HOE 140 plus PD 123319 did not produce additive potentiation. NOLA (30 microM) significantly enhanced sensitivity to angiotensin II, seen as a five-fold leftward shift of the curve, and an augmented maximum contractile response. Combinations of PD 123319 (1 microM) plus NOLA, and of HOE 140 (0.1 microM) plus NOLA, both induced a similar magnitude of potentiation. Cyclic GMP measurements confirmed angiotensin II-induced activation of the nitric oxide (NO) pathway. In conclusion, AT2 receptor-mediated inhibition of angiotensin II-induced contraction of the rat uterine artery involves NO production; a component of which occurs through a bradykinin B2 receptor pathway.     

Angiotensin II receptors involved in the enhancement of noradrenergic transmission in the caudal artery of the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

1. The effects of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan and the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319, on actions of angiotensin II in isolated caudal arteries of spontaneously hypertensive (SH) and age-matched normotensive (Wistar-Kyoto) rats were compared. 2. Angiotensin II (0.1-3 microM) produced concentration-dependent increases in perfusion pressure in artery preparations from both SH and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats, the maximal increase in the SH rat being significantly greater than the increase in WKY rats. The increase in perfusion pressure in preparations from both strains of rats was prevented by losartan (0.1 microM) and unaffected by PD 123319 (0.1 microM), indicating that the vasoconstrictor action of angiotensin II is subserved by AT1 receptors. 3. Angiotensin II (0.1-3 microM) produced concentration-dependent enhancement of both stimulation-induced (S-I) efflux of [3H]-noradrenaline and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses in isolated preparations of caudal artery from both SH and WKY rats, in which the noradrenergic transmitter stores had been labelled with [3H]-noradrenaline. The maximum enhancement of S-I efflux produced by angiotensin II (1 microM) was significantly greater in artery preparations from WKY rats than in preparations from SH rats, whereas the maximum enhancement of stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses was greater in preparations from SH rats than in those from WKY rats. 4. In artery preparations from both WKY and SH rats, the AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan (0.01 and 0.1 microM), reduced or abolished the enhancement of both S-I efflux and vasoconstrictor responses by 1 microM angiotensin II. 5. The combination of 0.01 microM losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II enhanced both the S-I efflux and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor response in caudal artery preparations from WKY rats, whereas 0.1 microM angiotensin alone was ineffective. The AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 (0.01 and 0.1 microM) prevented the enhancement of both S-I efflux and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses by the combination of angiotensin II and losartan. 6. In contrast to findings in WKY preparations and those previously obtained for arteries from another normotensive strain (Sprague-Dawley), in artery preparations from SH rats there was no synergistic interaction between losartan and angiotensin II. Rather, combinations of 0.1 microM angiotensin II and PD 123319 (both 0.01 and 0.1 microM) enhanced S-I [3H]-noradrenaline efflux, whereas 0.1 microM angiotensin II alone was without effect. Moreover, losartan (0.1 microM) prevented the enhancement of S-I efflux by the combination of angiotensin II and PD 123319. 7. The present findings indicate that in the caudal artery of WKY and SH rats, and as previously found in Sprague-Dawley preparations, angiotensin II receptors similar to the AT1B subtype subserve enhancement of transmitter noradrenaline release. 8. As previously suggested for Sprague-Dawley caudal artery preparations, the synergistic prejunctional interaction of losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II in caudal artery preparations from WKY rats may be due to either the unmasking by losartan of a latent population of angiotensin II receptors subserving facilitation of transmitter noradrenaline release, or blockade by losartan of an inhibitory action of angiotensin II on transmitter release. 9. The synergistic interaction of PD 123319 and 0.1 microM angiotensin II in caudal arteries of SH rats may also be explained by either of the mechanisms proposed for the normotensive strains, but the involvement of different receptor subtypes would need to be postulated for each of the proposed mechanisms.     

Lack of heterologous receptor desensitization induced by angiotensin II type 1 receptor activation in isolated normal rat thoracic aorta

We tested whether heterologous receptor desensitization induced by activation of AT1 receptors may explain the purported relaxation produced by angiotensin II in normal rat aorta. Also, the role for AT2 receptors in the promotion of vasodilation was studied. In endothelium-intact and endothelium-denuded aortic rings, angiotensin II elicited biphasic contractions, which were significantly depressed when repeated in each tissue. Angiotensin II produced biphasic responses on phenylephrine preconstricted endothelium-intact and endothelium-denuded tissues, without reducing precontractile tone. These responses were abolished in the presence of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan, but no relaxing responses to angiotensin II were uncovered. PD123319 did not influence angiotensin II responses in endothelium-intact tissues precontracted with phenylephrine; thus, under AT2 receptors blockade the contractile effects of angiotensin II were not overexposed. In conclusion, angiotensin II-induced biphasic responses can be attributed to AT1 receptors activation and rapid desensitization with time. Desensitization proved to be homologous in nature, since precontractile tone induced by phenylephrine was not depressed by angiotensin II (i.e., angiotensin II did not induce heterologous α1-adrenergic receptors desensitization). We found no functional evidence of the participation of AT2 receptors in angiotensin II elicited biphasic contractions. Angiotensin II does not exert relaxant effects in normal rat aorta.     

On the mechanism of coronary vasodilation induced by angiotensin-(1-7) in the isolated guinea pig heart

Various mechanisms have been postulated to be involved in angiotensin-(1-7)-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Here, we characterized the vasodilator action of angiotensin-(1-7) in the isolated guinea pig heart. Angiotensin-(1-7) (1-10 nmol, bolus) induced dose-dependent increase in the coronary flow. The coronary vasodilation induced by angiotensin-(1-7) was significantly reduced by the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-N(G)-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (100 microM) and abolished by a B(2) receptor antagonist, icatibant (100 nM). Coronary vasodilation induced by bradykinin (3 pmol, bolus) was inhibited by L-NAME and icatibant to similar extent as that induced by angiotensin-(1-7). Neither the selective AT(2) angiotensin receptor antagonist, PD123319 (1 microM), nor the antagonist of a putative angiotensin-(1-7) receptors, [D-alanine-7]-angiotensin-(1-7) (A-779, 1 microM), influenced the response to angiotensin-(1-7). In conclusion, in the isolated guinea pig heart angiotensin-(1-7) induces coronary vasodilation that is mediated by endogenous bradykinin and subsequent stimulation of nitric oxide release through endothelial B(2) receptors. In contrast to other vascular beds, AT(2) angiotensin receptors and specific angiotensin-(1-7) receptors do not appear involved in angiotensin-(1-7)-induced coronary vasodilation in the isolated guinea pig heart.     

Vascular kinin B(1) and B(2) receptor-mediated effects in the rat isolated perfused kidney - differential regulations

1. Bradydykinin (BK) and analogs acting preferentially at kinin B(1) or B(2) receptors were tested on the rat isolated perfused kidney. Kidneys were perfused in an open circuit with Tyrode's solution. Kidneys preconstricted with prostaglandin F(2alpha) were used for the analysis of vasodilator responses. 2. BK induced a concentration-dependent renal relaxation (pD(2)=8.9+/-0.4); this vasodilator response was reproduced by a selective B(2) receptor agonist, Tyr(Me)(8)-BK (pD(2)=9.0+/-0.1) with a higher maximum effect (E(max)=78.9+/-6.6 and 55.8+/-4.3% of ACh-induced relaxation respectively, n=6 and 19, P<0.02). Icatibant (10 nM), a selective B(2) receptor antagonist, abolished BK-elicited relaxation. Tachyphylaxis of kinin B(2) receptors appeared when repeatedly stimulated at 10 min intervals. 3. Des-Arg(9)-BK, a selective B(1) receptor agonist, induced concentration-dependent vasoconstriction at micromolar concentration. Maximum response was enhanced in the presence of lisinopril (1 microM) and inhibited by R 715 (8 microM), a selective B(1) receptor antagonist. Des-Arg(9)-[Leu(8)]-BK behaved as an agonist. 4. A contractile response to des-Arg(9)-BK occurred after 1 of perfusion and increased with time by a factor of about three over a 3 h perfusion. This post-isolation sensitization to des-Arg(9)-BK was abolished by dexamethasone (DEX, 30 mg kg(-1) i.p., 3 h before the start of the experiment and 10 microM in perfusate) and actinomycin D (2 microM). Acute exposure to DEX (10 microM) had no effect on sensitized des-Arg(9)-BK response, in contrast to indomethacin (30 microM) that abolished it. DEX pretreatment however had no effect on BK-induced renal vasodilation. 5. Present results indicate that the main renal vascular response to BK consists of relaxation linked to the activation of kinin B(2) receptors which rapidly desensitize. Renal B(1) receptors are also present and are time-dependently sensitized during the in vitro perfusion of the rat kidneys.     

Angiotensin II AT1 receptors in rat superior cervical ganglia: characterization and stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis.

Angiotensin II receptor number was higher in superior cervical ganglia of 2-week-old when compared to 8-week-old rats. In both young and adult rats, specific binding of [125I][Sar1]angiotensin II was displaced competitively by the AT1-receptor antagonist DuP 753 but not by the AT2-receptor competitor PD 123177. In ganglia from adult rats, DuP 753 competed with an IC50 of 113 nM. The stable guanine nucleotide GTP gamma S inhibited binding of [125I][Sar1]angiotensin II in young and adult rats by approximately 50% with IC50 values of 105 and 120 nM, respectively, suggesting that the angiotensin receptor is G-protein linked. Angiotensin II at a dose of 1 microM stimulated inositol phosphate formation 58% over control values in superior cervical ganglia from 8-week-old rats. This effect was totally blocked by 10 microM DuP 753 but not by 10 microM PD 123177. Our findings demonstrate that rat superior cervical ganglia contain AT1-type angiotensin receptors that are probably G-protein linked, and their stimulation results in increased inositol phospholipid metabolism.     

Multiple prejunctional actions of angiotensin II on noradrenergic transmission in the caudal artery of the rat.

1. Angiotensin II produced concentration-dependent enhancement of both stimulation-induced (S-I) efflux of [3H]-noradrenaline and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses in isolated preparations of rat caudal artery in which the noradrenergic transmitter stores had been labelled with [3H]-noradrenaline. The threshold concentrations of angiotensin II for enhancement of S-I efflux (between 0.03 and 0.1 microM) and of the stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses (about 0.3 microM) were 10-1000 times higher than those that have been found for several other vascular preparations. 2. The AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan (0.01 and 0.1 microM), reduced or abolished the enhancement of S-I efflux by 1 and 3 microM angiotensin II and the enhancement of vasoconstrictor responses by 1 microM angiotensin II. Surprisingly, the combination of 0.01 microM losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II enhanced S-I efflux to a much greater extent than did 0.1 microM angiotensin II alone. Moreover, the combination of 0.01 microM losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II enhanced stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses, in contrast to the lack of effect of 0.1 microM angiotensin II alone. 3. In a concentration of 0.01 microM, the angiotensin II AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 did not affect the enhancement of either S-I efflux or vasoconstrictor responses by angiotensin II. However, in a higher concentration (0.1 microM), PD 123319 antagonized the enhancement of both the S-I efflux and vasoconstrictor responses by angiotensin II. 4. In concentrations of 0.01 and 0.1 microM, PD 123319 prevented the marked enhancement of both S-I efflux and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses produced by the combination of 0.1 microM angiotensin II and 0.01 microM losartan. 5. The potentiation by losartan (0.01 microM) of the facilitatory effect of 0.1 microM angiotensin II on S-I efflux and on stimulation-evoked vasoconstriction was still observed in the presence of either the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (3 microM), or the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 100 microM). 6. The findings confirm our previous suggestion that, in the rat caudal artery, angiotensin II receptors similar to the AT1B subtype subserve enhancement of transmitter noradrenaline release. 7. The synergistic prejunctional interaction of 0.01 microM losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II may be due to either the unmasking by losartan of a latent population of angiotensin II receptors also subserving facilitation of transmitter noradrenaline release, or alternatively, losartan may block an inhibitory action of angiotensin II on transmitter noradrenaline release which normally opposes its facilitatory effect.     

Effect of neutral endopeptidase inhibition on vascular response induced by exogenous angiotensin I in the isolated rat lung

It is suggested that vasoconstriction mediated by angiotensin II cleaved from angiotensin I by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is counterbalanced by concomitant formation of vasodilator angiotensin (1-7) by neutral endopeptidase (NEP). Here, we tested this hypothesis using as a bioassay the isolated rat lung perfused with Krebs-Henseleit (KH) solution and ventilated with negative pressures. Addition of angiotensin I (100 nM) into the isolated lung resulted in an immediate increase in pulmonary arterial pressure (Delta PAP) which was not accompanied by a significant change in respiratory lung function or weight of the lung. The Delta PAP response induced by angiotensin I was abolished by an inhibitor of ACE, perindoprilate (1 microM), or by angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist (losartan, 1 microM) but not by angiotensin type 2 receptor antagonist (PD 123.319, 10 microM) suggesting the involvement of ACE and AT1 (but not AT2) receptors in this response. On the other hand, antagonist of bradykinin receptor B2 (icatibant, 100 nM) or an inhibitor of neutral endopeptidase, thiorphan (1 microM and 10 microM) did not modify DeltaPAP response induced by angiotensin I. In summary, in the isolated rat lung perfused with KH solution, ACE has a dominant role in the pulmonary conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, while NEP-derived angiotensin 1-7 does not seem to constitute a major counterbalancing mechanism in the pulmonary vasoconstriction induced by endogenously formed angiotensin II.     

Angiotensin II-mediated vasodilation is reduced in adult spontaneously hypertensive rats despite enhanced expression of AT2 receptors

1. The vasodilator action of angiotensin (Ang) II has not yet been demonstrated in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), nor have any possible changes in this response during the development of hypertension. 2. In the present study, the vasodilator effect of AngII was evaluated in the rat isolated, preconstricted mesenteric arterial bed (MAB) from 6- (young) and 24-week-old (adult) SHR and compared with effects on MAB from age-matched normotensive rats (control). 3. Angiotensin II (10-300 nmol) induced vasodilation in noradrenaline (NA)-preconstricted MAB that was greater in vessels from young compared with adult rats in both the control and SHR groups. Angiotensin II-induced vasodilation was reduced by the angiotensin AT(2) receptor antagonist PD 123319 (10 micromol/L), the angiotensin-(1-7) receptor antagonist A779 (1 micromol/L) and the bradykinin B(2) receptor antagonist HOE-140 (0.01 micromol/L), but not by the AT(1) receptor antagonist losartan (30 micromol/L). Expression of AT(2) receptors was weak in vessels from adult control rats compared with that in young control rats, whereas in young SHR AT(2) receptor expression was increased compared with that in young control rats. This increased expression of AT(2) receptors was maintained in adult SHR and there was no significant difference in AT(2) receptor expression between young and old SHR. 4. The findings of the present suggest that AngII induces an AT(2) receptor-mediated vasodilator effect in the MAB via activation of angiotensin-(1-7) and bradykinin receptors, an action that is reduced in adult control rats and adult SHR. In adult control rats, the attenuated response of AngII is probably due to endothelial dysfunction and reduced expression of AT(2) receptors, whereas in adult SHR it is associated with endothelial dysfunction alone. Increased expression of AT(2) receptors in SHR may represent a counteracting response for modulating blood pressure.     

Bradykinin B2 receptor evoked K+ permeability increase mediates relaxation in the rat duodenum.

We have investigated the receptors and associated coupling mechanisms that mediate the smooth muscle relaxant response to bradykinin (BK) in the rat duodenum in vitro. Relaxation in response to BK seems due to a direct action on the longitudinal smooth muscle since effects were demonstrable in the presence of ibuprofen, mepyramine, atropine, guanethidine (all 1 microM), hexamethonium (10 microM) and TTX (0.3 microM). Receptors involved are of the B2 subtype since agonists and antagonists active at B1 receptors were essentially inactive, and the B2 receptor antagonist Lys,Lys-[Hyp3,Thi5,8,D-Phe7]BK was a potent competitive antagonist of BK-induced relaxation (pKB of 7.2 +/- 0.1). The activity of both BK and the antagonist were unchanged by the presence of peptidase inhibitors including the carboxypeptidase inhibitor DL-2-mercaptomethyl-3-guanidinoethylthiopropanoic acid (mergetpa, 10 microM), which prevents conversion of BK analogues to des-Arg9-B1-active products. In high-K+ solution, BK (0.1-10 microM) produced concentration-related increases in 86Rb efflux. Both this permeability increase in high-K+ solution, and the relaxant responses in Krebs solution, were inhibited by low concentrations (10-100 nM) of apamin, as well as the B2 receptor antagonist Lys,Lys-[Hyp3,Thi5,8,D-Phe7]BK (1 microM). These results are compatable with the proposal that BK-evoked relaxation of the rat duodenum is mediated via a subset of B2 receptors for which the antagonist Lys,Lys-[Hyp3,Thi5,8,D-Phe7]BK has a high affinity, and results from stabilisation of the smooth muscle membrane through the opening of apamin-sensitive 86Rb-permeable calcium-activated K+ channels.     

Role of cyclooxygenase in vasodilation of retinal blood vessels induced by bradykinin in Brown Norway rats

We investigated the role of cyclooxygenase (COX) in bradykinin (BK)-induced vasodilation of retinal blood vessels in Brown Norway rats using a novel in vivo fluorescent fundus imaging technique. Under artificial ventilation, the animals were treated with tetrodotoxin, and the decreased blood pressure and heart rate were adjusted to the normal ranges by infusing pressor agents. Diameters of retinal blood vessels contained in the fluorescent fundus images were measured. Intravenous infusion of BK (1–30 µg/kg/min) increased diameters of retinal blood vessels and decreased blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner. The retinal vasodilator responses to BK were significantly attenuated by treatment with either indomethacin, a non-selective COX inhibitor, or nimesulide, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, but not with SC-560, a selective COX-1 inhibitor. These COX inhibitors failed to affect the depressor responses to BK. Under conditions of nitric oxide (NO) synthase blockade with N^G-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, no inhibitory effects of indomethacin on BK-induced vasodilation of retinal blood vessels were observed. These results suggest that the vasodilator effects of BK on retinal blood vessels are partly mediated through a COX-2-dependent pathway in Brown Norway rats. The prostanoid-dependent component of BK-induced retinal vasodilator response seems to be mediated by a mechanism that involves NO.     

Characterization of angiotensin II antagonism displayed by Ib, a novel nonpeptide angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonist

The pharmacologic profile of Ib, 5-n-butyl-4-{4-[2-(1H-tetrazole-5-yl)-1H-pyrrol-1-yl]phenylmethyl}-2,4-dihydro-2-(2,6-dichloridephenyl)-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, a novel nonpeptide angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonist, was investigated by receptor-binding studies, functional in vitro assays with rabbit and rat aorta, and in vivo experiments in rats. Ib inhibited [(125)I] angiotensin II binding to AT(1) receptors in rat liver membranes (K(i)=2.5+/-0.5 nM) and did not interact with AT(2) receptors in bovine cerebellar membranes. In functional studies with rat and rabbit aorta, Ib inhibited the contractile response to angiotensin II (pD(2)' value: 7.43 and 7.29, respectively) with a significant reduction in the maximum. In pithed rats, Ib inhibited the angiotensin II induced pressor response in a dose-related manner. After intravenous administration, Ib produced a dose-dependent antihypertensive effects in spontaneously hypertensive rats and renal hypertensive rats. These results suggest that Ib is a potent angiotensin AT(1) selective receptor antagonist with a mode of insurmountable antagonism.     

Pharmacological characterization of the novel nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, BIBR 277.

1. The pharmacological profile of BIBR 277, 4'-[(1,4'-dimethyl-2'-propyl[2,6'-bi-1H-benzimidazol]-1'-yl)methyl ]- [1,1'-biphenyl]-2-carboxylic acid, a novel, nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist has been investigated by use of receptor binding studies, enzymatic assays, functional in vitro assays in rabbit aorta as well as in vivo experiments in pithed, anaesthetized and conscious rats. 2. BIBR 277 potently interacted with rat AT1 receptors (Ki 3.7 nM). Competitive receptor interaction was shown by radioligand saturation experiments performed in the presence of BIBR 277. The failure to inhibit radioligand binding to AT2 sites demonstrates the selectivity of BIBR 277 for AT1 receptors. This is further substantiated by the findings that BIBR 277 neither interacted with other receptor systems investigated nor affected the activity of components of the human renin-angiotensin system, such as plasma renin or serum converting enzyme. 3. In rabbit aorta, BIBR 277 had no agonistic properties and was shown to be an insurmountable antagonist of angiotensin II-induced contractions (KB 0.33 nM). The antagonistic effect persisted even after several wash-out procedures. However, this interaction was not irreversible since the insurmountable antagonism was concentration-dependently reversed when BIBR 277 (0.1 microM) and the surmountable antagonist, losartan (0.1 and 1.0 microM) were incubated simultaneously. The specificity of BIBR 277 for the AT1 receptor was further substantiated in this preparation since micromolar concentrations of BIBR 277 neither affected potassium chloride and noradrenaline-induced contractions nor acetylcholine-mediated tissue relaxation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Inhibitory effect of a novel angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist RNH-6270 on growth of vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats: different anti-proliferative effect to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.

The current study was undertaken to evaluate the anti-proliferative effect of a novel angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, RNH-6270, on exaggerated growth of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) from spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), in comparison with the effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. RNH-6270 and temocapril significantly inhibited basal DNA synthesis in VSMCs from SHRs in a dose-dependent manner, but not in cells from Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. SHR-derived VSMC showed a hyperresponse of DNA synthesis to serum and angiotensin II compared with that of WKY rats-derived VSMC. RNH-6270 did not affect serum-stimulated DNA synthesis in VSMCs from both rat strains. RNH-6270 abolished angiotensin II-stimulated DNA synthesis in VSMC from both rat strains. RNH-6270 significantly inhibited proliferation of VSMC from both rat strains, but the ACE inhibitor temocapril did not exert such an effect. RNH-6270 decreased the specific binding of angiotensin II to VSMC in a competitive manner for angiotensin II receptors in both rat strains. RNH-6270 and temocapril significantly decreased the expression of growth factor mRNAs and proteins in VSMC from SHR, but not in cells from WKY rats. These results suggest that RNH-6270 is a potent AT1 receptor antagonist and has anti-proliferative effects on VSMCs from SHR, which was not seen with an ACE inhibitor. The growth inhibitory effect of RNH-6270 may be associated with the inhibition of growth factors via antagonism to AT1 receptors.