泮托拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的疗效

目的：观察国产泮托拉唑和进口奥美拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的疗效和安全性。方法：反流性食管炎患者共60例，随机分为2组，分别口服国产泮托拉唑胶囊40mg和进口奥美拉唑胶囊20mg，早晚各1次，疗程8周，疗程结束后内镜复查。并详细记录不良反应。结果：泮托拉唑组和奥美拉唑组疗效分别为：治愈93．4％和83．3％．有效3．3％和6．7％，显效3．3%和10％(P＞0．05)。2组患者的烧心、反酸、胸骨后灼痛等症状在治疗后的积分值均明显减少(P＜0．01)；胃镜下反流性食管炎(RE)的疗效分别为：无效3．3％和3．3％，有效3．3％和3．3％，显效3．3％和6．7％，治愈90．1％和86．7％(P＞0．05)。2组患者均能良好耐受，末发现严重的不良反应。结论：国产拌托拉唑能明显改善反流性食管炎的临床症状和镜下表现，疗效确切，使用安全。     

泮托拉唑和奥美拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的成本-效果分析

目的 :比较泮托拉唑和奥美拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的经济效果。方法 :6 4例患者随机分为两组 ,一组给予泮托拉唑 ,另一组给予奥美拉唑 ,运用药物经济学方法进行成本—效果分析。结果 :泮托拉唑和奥美拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的显效率分别为 93.8%和 90 .6 % ,泮托拉唑的成本—效果比低于奥美拉唑。结论 :泮托拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的经济效果优于奥美拉唑     

奥美拉唑和泮托拉唑在反流性食管炎中的成本效果观察

目的比较分析奥美拉唑和泮托拉唑在反流性食管炎中的成本效果差异性。方法回顾性分析我院2012年1月至2014年1月收治的85例反流性食管炎患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法不同,将患者分为2组,奥美拉唑组和泮托拉唑组,两组患者疗程结束后比较成本效果差异。结果奥美拉唑组42例患者,治疗总有效率为90.48%,泮托拉唑组43例患者,治疗总有效率为93.02%,略高于奥美拉唑组,经比较,P>0.05,无显著性差异。奥美拉唑组的C/E值为4.99,明显小于泮托拉唑组,说明奥美拉唑组患者的治疗成本效果较好。结论采用国产奥美拉唑肠溶片治疗反流性食管炎具有相对的成本效果优势,是较为理想的治疗方案。     

奥美拉唑、泮托拉唑在高龄患者反流性食管炎中的临床疗效分析

目的比较分析奥美拉唑和泮托拉唑在高龄反流性食管炎患者中的临床疗效。方法随机选取我院自2010年至今收诊的高龄反流性食管炎患者70例,按入院先后顺序分为观察组(36例)和对照组(34例),安排观察组患者服用奥美拉唑胶囊,每天2次,每次20 mg,安排对照组患者服用泮托拉唑胶囊,每天2次,每次40 mg,观察并比较两组患者疗效及不良反应出现的情况。结果观察组患者治愈率为91.7%,对照组患者治愈率为94.1%,治愈率无明显差异(P>0.05)。另外观察组患者不良反应率为2例,对照组患者不良反应率为1例,二者无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论奥美拉唑与泮托拉唑均能有效抑酸,有效治疗高龄反流性食管炎患者,并减少病症反复。与奥美拉唑相比,泮托拉唑成本更低,有利于减轻患者经济压力。     

埃索美拉唑与泮托拉唑对反流性食管炎患者症状缓解效果的对比分析

目的:探讨埃索美拉唑与泮托拉唑对反流性食管炎患者症状缓解的效果.方法 :选取2015年1月—2015年12月我院收治的反流性食管炎患者118例,以随机分组方式分为埃索美拉唑组60例(予埃索美拉唑治疗),泮托拉唑组58例(予泮托拉唑治疗),采用反流性食管炎症状积分量表作为评价工具,观察两组的疗效及不良反应发生情况.结果 :治疗前及治疗后1、5、6 d,两组反流性食管炎症状积分基本相同(P>0.05).治疗后2、3、4 d,埃索美拉唑组反流性食管炎症状积分均低于泮托拉唑组(P<0.05).两组均未见药物不良反应(P>0.05).结论 :埃索美拉唑和泮托拉唑均有效缓解反流性食管炎症状,且具有良好耐受性,而埃索美拉唑缓解反流性食管炎症状较泮托拉唑更为迅速.     

不同疗程泮托拉唑治疗老年反流性食管炎的临床效果分析

目的探讨不同疗程泮托拉唑治疗老年反流性食管炎的临床效果。方法选择我院老年反流性食管炎患者100例,随机分为观察组和对照组,分别为50例。两组患者均根据医嘱指导饮食,观察组和对照组患者均服用泮托拉唑服用,每次服用40 mg,每天服用2次,两组患均连续治疗8周。8周疗程结束后,观察组和对照组均进行疗效评定,其中观察组和对照组有效病例(显效和有效病例之和)分别为42例和41例。观察组42例患者继续服用泮托拉唑,改为每天1次,每次40 mg,连续服用40周。对照组患者病例共治疗8周,观察组治疗有效患者共治疗48周。48周结束后再次评定两组患者疗效。结果观察组治疗8周的总有效率和对照组同期的总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组治疗48周后的总有效率高于同期的对照组总有效率,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论长疗程应用泮托拉唑治疗老年反流性食管炎疗效显著,值得临床借鉴。     

泮托拉唑治疗反流性食管炎31例

目的:观察泮托拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的疗效及安全性.方法:经胃镜检查证实的反流性食管炎患者56例,随机分成治疗组31例,应用泮托拉唑40 mg,qn,西沙必利5 mg,tid;对照组25例,奥美拉唑20 mg,bid,西沙必利5 mg,tid,两组疗程均为8～12周.观察症状缓解时间为2,4,8,12周末并记录;进行胃镜观察愈合时间分别为4,8,12周末.结果:治疗组与对照组的症状缓解情况,2周末两组差异无显著性(P＞0.05);4,8周末治疗组均优于对照组(前者P＜0.01,后者P＜0.05),12周末两组差异无显著性(P＞0.05).胃镜观察愈合率,4,8周末治疗组均优于对照组(均P＜0.05);12周末两组差异无显著性(P＞0.05).结论:泮托拉唑治疗反流性食管炎有较好的疗效:症状缓解率与疗程较奥美拉唑短,不良反应少,且总疗程费用泮托拉唑少,是一种新的有效质子泵抑制药.     

伊托必利联合泮托拉唑治疗反流性食管炎效果观察

目的观察伊托必利联合泮托拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的临床疗效。方法将经胃镜检查确诊的反流性食管炎患者85例分为两组。观察组43例,予口服伊托必利50mg,3次/d;泮托拉唑40mg,2次/d,疗程8周。对照组42例,予口服泮托拉唑40mg,2次/d,疗程8周。比较两组治疗后的症状疗效及内镜下疗效。结果症状疗效:观察组显效36例,有效5例,无效2例,总有效率为95.4%;对照组显效27例,有效7例,无效8例,总有效率为81.0%。内镜下疗效:观察组治愈19例,有效21例,总有效率为93.0%;对照组治愈15例,有效17例,总有效率为76.2%。两组症状疗效及内镜下总有效率比较,差异有统计学意义。观察组、对照组不良反应发生率分别为4.7%、7.1%,两组接近,差异无统计学意义。结论伊托必利联合泮托拉唑治疗反流性食管炎与泮托拉唑比较安全高效。     

泮托拉唑加达立通颗粒治疗反流性食管炎60例临床研究

目的观察泮托拉唑加达立通颗粒治疗反流性食管炎的疗效。方法将120例反流性食管炎患者随机分为2组,观察组60例给予泮托拉唑加达立通颗粒治疗,对照组给予泮托拉唑加莫沙必利治疗,两组均治疗8周后判定疗效。结果观察组临床症状改善总有效率93.3%,优于对照组总有效率73.3%;观察组胃镜疗效总有效率86.7%,优于对照组66.7%,两组比较差异显著(P<0.05)。结论泮托拉唑加达立通颗粒是治疗反流性食管炎的有效方法。     

不同方法治疗基于幽门螺杆菌的反流性食管炎的疗效研究

目的探究不同方法治疗基于幽门螺杆菌的反流性食管炎的临床疗效。方法将我院从2010年11月至2012年3月收治的120例基于幽门螺杆菌感染的反流性食管炎患者随机均分为A、B、C三组,A组40例采用泮托拉唑联合西沙必利治疗,B组40例采用奥美拉唑联合西沙必利治疗,C组40例单用泮托拉唑治疗,三组均给予阿莫西林(或甲硝唑)和克拉霉素,治疗持续治疗4周。统计治疗有效率。结果 A组总有效率95%,B组总有效率82.5%,C组总有效率77.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论泮托拉唑联合西沙必利能有效治疗基于幽门螺杆菌的反流性食管炎,具有良好的临床疗效。     

Comparable clinical efficacy and tolerability of 20 mg pantoprazole and 20 mg omeprazole in patients with grade I reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials have shown that pantoprazole (40 mg) and omeprazole (40 or 20 mg) have similar efficacy and safety in the treatment of grade II-IV reflux oesophagitis (Savary-Miller classification). AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily doses of pantoprazole (20 mg) and omeprazole (20 mg) with respect to symptom relief and healing of patients with grade I reflux oesophagitis. METHODS: Patients with endoscopically established grade I reflux oesophagitis (non-confluent, patchy red lesions with/without white fibrin coating) were enrolled into this randomized, open, parallel-group, multicentre study. A total of 328 patients (n=166 in the pantoprazole group, n=162 in the omeprazole group) were recruited in 23 centres. Patients received 4 weeks of treatment. If the reflux oesophagitis was not completely healed, the treatment was extended to 8 weeks. RESULTS: After 2 and 4 weeks of treatment with either pantoprazole or omeprazole, the rate of symptom relief was similar (70% vs. 79% and 77% vs. 84%, respectively). High healing rates were observed after 4 and 8 weeks (pantoprazole: 84% and 90%, respectively; omeprazole: 89% and 95%, respectively). Both treatments were well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events on pantoprazole and omeprazole, respectively, were nausea (8% vs. 7%), diarrhoea (5% vs. 6%) and headache (6% vs. 3%). CONCLUSIONS: After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment with pantoprazole (20 mg) or omeprazole (20 mg), patients with mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (grade I) showed comparably high rates of symptom relief and healing. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated.     

国产泮托拉唑与进口奥美拉唑预防应激性溃疡的疗效及成本效果分析

目的:观察国产泮托拉唑与进口奥美拉唑预防应激性溃疡的疗效以及成本-效果比较。方法:52例应激性溃疡高危病人随机分为泮托拉唑与奥美拉唑2组,分别予泮托拉唑或奥美拉唑40 mg,加入氯化钠注射液100 mL中静脉滴注,12 h 1次。每4 h记录病人胃液pH值,同时每日记录病人胃液、呕吐物及粪便潜血试验结果,分析每组的疗效及成本-效果比。结果:泮托拉唑组与奥美拉唑组胃液pH值≥4的百分比分别为46．4％和49．0％,应激性溃疡的发生率分别为11％和17％,2组相比均无显著差异(P＞0．05);而泮托拉唑组成本-效果比为6．5,明显低于奥美拉唑组(11．5)。结论:国产泮托拉唑与进口奥美拉唑预防应激性溃疡具有相同的疗效,前者成本明显降低。国产泮托拉唑是预防应激性溃疡的一个安全、经济而又有效的方法。     

Pantoprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of acute gastric ulcers

Background: Pantoprazole is a new substituted benzimidazole which is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion by its action upon H⁺,K⁺-ATPase. Methods: The proton pump inhibitors pantoprazole and omeprazole were compared in a randomized, doubleblind study in 219 patients with benign gastric ulcers. Patients received either pantoprazole 40 mg (n= 146) or omeprazole 20 mg (n= 73), once daily before breakfast for 4 weeks. Treatment was extended for a further 4 weeks if the ulcer had not healed. Results: After 4 weeks, complete ulcer healing was seen in 88% of protocol-correct patients given pantoprazole and in 77% given omeprazole (between-group difference P < 0.05). At 8 weeks, the corresponding values were 97% and 96% (not significant). In the comparative intention-to-treat analysis there were no statistical differences between the treatment groups. Among the patients who had ulcer pain prior to treatment, 79% of the pantoprazole group and 68% of the omeprazole group were pain-free after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks 88% and 81%, respectively (not significant). Pronounced improvement in the other gastrointestinal symptoms was seen in both groups. Only 10% of patients in each group reported adverse events. There were moderate increases in fasting serum gastrin levels with both treatments at 4 and 8 weeks. Conclusion: Pantoprazole, 40 mg once daily in the morning, is a highly effective, well tolerated treatment for acute, benign gastric ulcer. Pantoprazole and omeprazole were equally safe in the therapy of gastric ulcer.     

Pantoprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis: a European multicentre study

Background: Pantoprazole is a new substituted benzimidazole which inhibits gastric H⁺,K⁺-ATPase. Methods: In this double-blind, multicentre study, pantoprazole 40 mg once daily was compared with omeprazole 20 mg once daily in the treatment of grade II and III (Savary–Miller) reflux oesophagitis. Endoscopy was repeated after 4 weeks of treatment, and also after 8 weeks in patients unhealed at 4 weeks. Results: The primary efficacy variable was ulcer healing; after 4 weeks, 81/103 (78.6%) patients in the pantoprazole group and 83/105 (79.0%) patients in the omeprazole group had healed completely. After 8 weeks, the cumulative healing rates were 94.2% and 91.4 % in the pantoprazole and omeprazole groups, respectively (P > 0.05 at 4 weeks and 8 weeks). Both groups experienced rapid relief of the key symptoms: heartburn, acid regurgitation and pain on swallowing. The time course of relief of the individual symptoms was similar in both groups after 2 and 4 weeks (P > 0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, with only three patients withdrawing owing to adverse events. Conclusion: Pantoprazole has been shown to be as effective as omeprazole in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.     

雷贝拉唑、莫沙必利及麦滋林联合治疗反流性食管炎35例

目的观察雷贝拉唑、莫沙越利及麦滋林联合治疗反流性食管炎的临床疗效。方法将91例经胃镜确诊的反流性食管炎患者随机分为3组．治疗组35例给予雷贝拉唑10mg，1次／d，对照Ⅰ组28例给予奥美拉唑20mg，1次／d，对照Ⅱ组28例给予法莫替丁20mg，2次／d，Ⅱ组均联用莫沙必利5mg,1次／d及麦滋林0．67g，3次／d，疗程8周。结果治疗组总有效率为97．14％，一日缓解率为83，25％，明显优于2个对照组，且不良反应少；症状平均消失天数与对照组亦有明显差异。结论雷贝拉唑、莫沙珏利及麦滋林联合治疗反流性食管炎能迅速缓解症状，且安全可靠；     

奥美拉唑与泮托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的疗效比较

目的比较奥美拉唑与泮托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的临床疗效。方法将符合病例入选标准的120例消化性溃疡患者随机分为观察组、对照组,每组60例。2组均给予阿莫西林、克拉霉素。观察组同时用泮托拉唑40mg+l00ml生理盐水,静脉滴注,2次/d。对照组用奥美拉唑40mg+l00ml生理盐水,2次/d。2组均以连续治疗2周为1个疗程,治疗1个疗程后观察疗效。结果观察组治愈率为60.00%,总有效率为95.00%;对照组治愈率为35.00%,总有效率为73.33%。2组治愈率、总有效率相比有明显差异(P<0.05)。腹痛、上腹胀、反酸、嗳气等症状积分2组治疗前后组内相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗后2组组间相比差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用泮托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的疗效较奥美拉唑显著。     

和胃汤辅助奥美拉唑治疗胃食管反流病的疗效观察

目的观察和胃汤辅助奥关拉唑治疗胃食管反流病（GERD）的疗效。方法67例GERD患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,前者清晨顿服奥美拉唑20mg,夜间睡前服用和胃汤,对照组清晨顿服奥美拉唑20mg,疗程6周。于治疗后2、4、6周观察胃灼热、反酸、胸骨后痛等症状的缓解情况,并于6周后复查胃镜及24h食管pH值,比较两组的治愈率。结果治疗组治疗2、4、6周后总有效率分别为80．00％、85．71％、94．28％,对照组治疗2、4、6周后总有效率分别为62．50％、68．75％、71．88％,两组比较有极显著性差异（P〈0．05）;治疗组治疗6周后内镜下A、B、C—D级食管炎治愈率分别达82．35％、73．33％、66．67％,对照组治疗6周后内镜下A、B级食管炎内镜下治愈率分别为46．67％、37．14％,C—D级食管炎治愈率为零,两组比较有极显著性差异（P〈0．05）;两组治疗6周后经24h食管pH值监测,治疗组反流次数明显少于对照组（P〈0．05）。结论和胃汤辅助奥关拉唑治疗GERD的疗效明显优于单用奥美拉唑者（P〈0．05）。     

Comparison of pantoprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of acute duodenal ulceration—a multicentre study

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, the proton pump inhibitors pantoprazole and omeprazole were compared in patients with active duodenal ulcers. Two hundred and seventy-six protocol-correct patients received either pantoprazole 40 mg (n= 185) or omeprazole 20 mg (n= 91), once daily for 2 or 4 weeks, depending on the progress of ulcer healing. Results: Rates of complete ulcer healing after 2 weeks were 71% in patients given pantoprazole and 74% in patients given omeprazole. After 4 weeks the figures were 96% and 91%, respectively. These differences were not significant. There was no significant difference in ulcer pain prior to treatment, and 85% of the pantoprazole group and 86% on omeprazole were pain-free after 2 weeks (not significant). The time until complete pain relief with pantoprazole or omeprazole, based on data from diary cards, was not significantly different (P < 0.05, Uleman's U-test). Both treatments were equally well tolerated. Changes in routine laboratory parameters were minimal in both groups. Conclusion: Pantoprazole was shown to be a highly-effective and well-tolerated treatment for acute duodenal ulcer. Pantoprazole 40 mg and omeprazole 20 mg were equally effective with respect to ulcer healing and pain relief, and have similar adverse event profiles.     

国产格列美脲胶囊在治疗2型糖尿病中的作用

目的：评价国产格列美脲胶囊应用于2型糖尿病患者的有效性和安全性。方法：40例2型糖尿病患者随机分为试验组和对照组各20例，分别口服国产和进口格列美脲剂量2－8mg,qd疗程8周。治疗前后测定空腹及餐后2h血糖。结果：治疗8周后，试验组空腹血糖（FBG）下降，3．14mol/L(32．31％），餐后2h血糖（PBG）下降4．96mmol/L(37．36 %)，糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c)下降1．60％（16．98％），与对照组相比无统计学意义（P＞0．05）。试验组降低FBG与PBG的总有效率分别为85％和90％，与对照组相比（85％，80％0无统计学意义。结论：国产格列美脲胶囊能有效降低FBG和PGB，其降糖疗效与进口格列美脲相似。