Tenofovir‐based alternate therapies for chronic hepatitis B patients with partial virological response to entecavir

Entecavir (ETV) is a first‐line antiviral therapy for treating chronic hepatitis B (CHB); however, some patients have suboptimal response to ETV. Currently, there are limited data on how to approach these patients. Therefore, our aim was to compare the effectiveness of two alternate therapies – tenofovir (TDF) monotherapy and combination therapy of ETV+TDF – in CHB patients with ETV partial virological response. We conducted a retrospective study of 68 patients who had partial virological response to ETV, defined as having detectable HBV DNA following at least 12 months of ETV, and were switched to TDF monotherapy (n = 25) or ETV+TDF (n = 43). Patients were seen in seven US liver/community‐based clinics and started on ETV between 2005 and 2009. The majority of patients were male; the vast majority were Asian and had positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Patients in both groups had similar pretreatment characteristics. Complete viral suppression (CVS) rates with TDF monotherapy and ETV+TDF were similar after 6 months (71% vs 83%, P = 0.23) and 12 months (86% vs 84%, P = 0.85), and there was no statistically significant difference in CVS rates even when only patients with higher HBV DNA levels at switch (>1000 IU/mL) were evaluated. Multivariate analysis indicated that ETV+TDF was not an independent predictor of CVS compared to TDF monotherapy (OR = 1.19, P = 0.63). In conclusion, TDF monotherapy and ETV+TDF are comparable in achieving CVS in CHB patients with partial virological response to ETV. Long‐term alternate therapy with one pill (TDF monotherapy) vs two pills (ETV+TDF) could lead to lower nonadherence rates and better treatment outcomes.     

Long‐term entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy in treatment‐naïve chronic hepatitis B patients in the real‐world setting

The aim of this study was to determine the long‐term efficacy of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) on the natural course of disease in chronic hepatitis B patients (CHB) with/without cirrhosis in clinical practice. A total of 355 treatment‐naïve CHB patients were enrolled into the study. The primary outcome measure was viral suppression as defined by serum HBV DNA level <20 IU/mL. A secondary outcome measure was to determine the development of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Virological and biochemical responses were similar between the two treatment groups over time. The presence of cirrhosis and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity did not appear to impact viral suppression. The cumulative probability of HBeAg loss was 41% at 4 years of therapy. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss occurred in four patients. Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score was significantly improved from baseline to week 48 and 96 under antiviral therapy (P = 0.013, P = 0.01). HCC was diagnosed in 17 patients (4.8%). The cumulative probability of the development of HCC was 3.3% at 1 year and 7.3% at 4 years of therapy. The development of HCC was independently associated with older age (P = 0.031) and the presence of cirrhosis (P = 0.004). Serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearance remained stable over time. ETV and TDF effectively maintained virological and biochemical responses in long‐term follow‐up of CHB patients with/without cirrhosis. HCC may still develop, although at a lower rate, and is more likely to develop in patients with cirrhosis, especially in older patients.     

IFNL3 (IL28B) polymorphism does not predict long‐term response to interferon therapy in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients

The impact of IFNL3 (IL28B) polymorphism on response to interferon (IFN) treatment in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is controversial. We aimed to investigate whether IFNL3 polymorphism (rs12979860) influences the long‐term response of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment to conventional IFN. Design: Ninety‐seven HBeAg‐positive patients treated with IFN were evaluated in this study. Associations were investigated between IFNL3 genotypes and (i) HBeAg seroconversion at the end of treatment (EOT), (ii) sustained virological response (SVR) and (iii) HBsAg seroconversion through long‐term follow‐up (LTFU). Patients were followed for a median of 14 years. The majority of patients were infected with HBV genotype A (69.6%) and were Caucasian (77.9%). Ninety‐five patients were genotyped at rs12979860. Similar IFNL3 distribution was observed among the different ethnicities (P = 0.62) or across HBV genotypes A through G (P = 0.70). Thirty‐six patients experienced HBeAg seroconversion at EOT; HBeAg seroconversion rates were 37.0 and 35.5% in patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes, respectively (P = 0.82). Among the 44 patients (45%) who achieved a SVR, SVR rates were 48.9 and 39.6% in patients with CC and CT/TT IL28B genotypes, respectively (P = 0.80). HBsAg seroconversion occurred through LTFU in 28 patients. HBsAg seroconversion rates were 25.5 and 31.2% in patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes, respectively (P = 0.51). No significant relationship between IFNL3 rs12979860 and fibrosis stage was observed (P = 0.85). IFNL3 genotype was neither associated with SVR, nor with HBeAg seroconversion and long‐term HBsAg seroconversion in HBeAg‐positive CHB patients responding to IFN therapy.     

Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate,Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entecavir: Which is the Most Effective Drug for Chronic Hepatitis B? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background and AimsThe therapeutic effect of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) on chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients remains inconsistent. The aim of this study was to explore the differences in virological responses to TAF, TDF and ETV in patients with CHB.MethodsLiterature searches were conducted of the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies published up to July 21, 2020. Statistical comparisons of virological response between TDF, ETV, and TAF were carried out with pooled odds ratio (OR) values.ResultsThe virological response in TDF-treated CHB patients was notably superior to that of the ETV-treated CHB patients after 12-weeks [OR=1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89–1.41], 24-weeks (OR=1.33, 95% CI: 1.11–1.61), 48-weeks (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.16–2.25), 72-weeks (OR=1.43, 95% CI: 0.78–2.62), and 96-weeks (OR=1.56, 95% CI: 0.87–2.81) treatment. No significant difference was observed for the virological responses in CHB patients after 48-weeks treatment with TAF or TDF. The virological response in TDF+ETV-treated CHB patients was superior to that of TDF-treated CHB patients after 24-weeks, 48-weeks (OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.17–2.02), 96-weeks, and 144-weeks.ConclusionsThe virological response in TDF-treated CHB patients was superior to that in ETV-treated CHB patients, but there was no significant difference between TAF and TDF. In addition, the therapeutic effect of TDF+ETV was superior to TDF alone.     

Systematic review and meta‐analysis: Development of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatitis e antigen seroconversion

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion is considered to have significantly favourable clinical outcomes for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, inconsistent study results suggest that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still occurs in patients with HBeAg seroconversion. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the incidence of HCC in patients with CHB after HBeAg seroconversion. Web of Science, PubMed and Embase databases were searched through January 2017. The incidence of HCC in CHB patients after HBeAg seroconversion was pooled using a random‐effects model or fix‐effects model. Sixteen studies were finally included, involving 4910 patients with HBeAg seroconversion. The overall pooled proportion suggested that 3.33% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.28%‐4.58%) of patients with CHB develop HCC despite HBeAg seroconversion. In patients with HBeAg seroconversion without cirrhosis, the pooled proportion of HCC development was 0.94% (95% CI: 0.15%‐2.4%). Moreover, patients with cirrhosis, active hepatitis, or aged greater than 40 years at the time of HBeAg seroconversion were at significantly higher risk for HCC development. HBeAg seroconversion was significantly associated with a reduced risk of HCC compared with persistently positive HBeAg (RR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35‐0.97, P = .04). Despite the reduced risk with HBeAg seroconversion, HCC can still occur in a proportion of patients with CHB after HBeAg seroconversion. Long‐term monitoring is needed for patients with established cirrhosis, active hepatitis or those older than 40 years at the time of HBeAg seroconversion.     

Optimal drug administration manner would rescue partial virological response in chronic hepatitis B patients with entecavir or tenofovir treatment

Not all treatment‐naïve patients receiving entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy can achieve complete virological response, and many factors may be related with the outcome of partial virological response. This study aimed to determine whether the manner of drug administration affects the antiviral efficacy of ETV/TDF monotherapy. All eligible patients were divided into complete or partial response cohorts based on their virological response following 24‐week therapy. Factors related with partial response were evaluated. Patients with partial response were further grouped depending on whether they later adjusted the manner of drug administration, and the antiviral efficacy was compared between the two groups during prolonged treatment. A total of 518 patients were enrolled. Suboptimal drug administration (OR 77.511, P = .000), positive‐HBeAg (OR 3.191, P = .000) and ETV treatment (OR 2.537, P = .001) were identified as independent risk factors for partial response. Among patients with partial response, 213 were in the adjusted group and 76 were in the unadjusted group. The percentages of patients with undetectable serum HBV DNA (78.9% vs 31.6%, P < .001) and with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (88.7% vs 68.4%, P < .001) were both higher in the adjusted group than that in unadjusted group following a further 6‐month therapy. In conclusion, the manner of drug administration is an important factor influencing the efficacy of ETV/TDF therapy, and optimal drug administration manner can help to increase antiviral efficacy and rescue patients with partial response.     

Randomized prospective study showing the non‐inferiority of tenofovir to entecavir in treatment‐naïve chronic hepatitis B patients

Aim

The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir hydrate (ETV) in nucleos(t)ide analog (NA)‐naïve Japanese chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

Methods

This multicenter, randomized, double‐blinded study assessing the efficacy and safety of TDF 300 mg and ETV 0.5 mg in NA‐naïve CHB subjects was carried out from November 2011 to November 2014, and funded by GlaxoSmithKline. The subjects were assigned to the TDF arm or ETV arm in a 2:1 ratio. The primary efficacy endpoint was the non‐inferiority of TDF to ETV at week 24.

Results

A total of 166 subjects (TDF arm, 110; ETV arm, 56) were enrolled. The change (mean ± SE) in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐DNA levels from baseline to week 24 was ?4.63 ± 0.044 and ?4.50 ± 0.063 log₁₀ copies/mL in the TDF and ETV arms, respectively, indicating the non‐inferiority of TDF to ETV (P < 0.0001). The proportion of subjects with undetectable HBV‐DNA increased from 54 to 77% and 39 to 66% in the TDF and ETV arms with continuation of the treatment from week 24 to 48, respectively. Reduction in hepatitis B surface antigen level was greater in subjects with hepatitis B envelope antigen (+) and high alanine aminotransferase levels (≥80 IU/L). Prevalence of drug‐related adverse events at week 48 was 20% and 18% in the TDF and ETV arms, respectively.

Conclusions

The study is the first to report that TDF has non‐inferiority to ETV in treatment effectiveness (lowering of serum HBV‐DNA level) at week 24. ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration nos. NCT01480284 and GSK LOC115409.     

Long‐term follow‐up of patients treated with entecavir and peginterferon add‐on therapy for HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B infection: ARES long‐term follow‐up

Addition of peginterferon alpha (PEG‐IFN add‐on) to entecavir (ETV) treatment after a short lead‐in phase results in more response than ETV monotherapy in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB). This study is the first to assess long‐term efficacy of this treatment strategy. Patients who received ETV ± 24 weeks of PEG‐IFN add‐on in a global trial (ARES study) and completed follow‐up were eligible to participate in this observational LTFU study if they had at least one combined HBeAg and HBV DNA measurement beyond week 96 of the ARES study. The primary endpoint was combined response (HBeAg loss and HBV DNA <200 IU/mL) at LTFU. In total, 48 patients treated with PEG‐IFN add‐on and 48 patients treated with ETV monotherapy were included. The median follow‐up duration was 226 (IQR 51) weeks, and 86/96 (90%) patients were initial non‐responders. At LTFU, combined response was present in 13 (27%) vs 11 (23%) patients (P = 0.81), and 1 log₁₀ HBsAg decline in 59% vs 28% (P = 0.02) for PEG‐IFN add‐on and ETV monotherapy, respectively. In 41 initial non‐responders who continued ETV therapy, combined response at LTFU was present in 9 patients (PEG‐IFN add‐on: 5/22 [23%]; ETV monotherapy: 4/19 [21%]). Beyond week 96 of follow‐up, rates of serological response became comparable between PEG‐IFN add‐on and ETV monotherapy. Although in this LTFU study initial non‐responders were overrepresented in the add‐on arm, PEG‐IFN add‐on possibly leads rather to accelerated HBeAg loss than to increased long‐term HBeAg loss rates.     

Pegylated interferon alfa for chronic hepatitis B: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Conventional interferon alfa and nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as lamivudine, are frequently used for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment, but are associated with adverse effects and viral resistance. Here we performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluating all studies of pegylated interferon alfa (PEG‐IFNα) treatment in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients with CHB. We searched electronic databases – PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and LILACS – for randomized controlled trials evaluating PEG‐IFNα therapy between 1999 and September 2014. Virological response was the primary outcome. We identified 14 studies involving 2829 patients. Our analysis revealed that PEG‐IFNα + lamivudine combination therapy produced better virological and biochemical responses than PEG‐IFNα monotherapy in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients at the end of treatment. PEG‐IFNα + adefovir dipivoxil achieved better seroconversion rate than PEG‐IFNα in HBeAg‐positive patients at the end of treatment. The present findings demonstrated a beneficial response rate following PEG‐IFNα combination therapy with nucelos(t)ides among HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients with CHB. Further trials are needed to investigate simultaneous and sequential therapy strategies.     

Relapse rates in chronic hepatitis B naïve patients after discontinuation of antiviral therapy with entecavir

Registration studies show entecavir (ETV) to be effective and safe in NUC‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B, but relapse rates after treatment discontinuation have not been well established. Relapse rates and predictors of relapse were evaluated in naïve HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients treated with ETV. Treatment duration was defined according to international guidelines. Virological relapse was defined as reappearance in serum of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to >2000 IU/mL after discontinuation of treatment. A hundred and sixty‐nine consecutive patients were treated for a median 181 weeks. 61% were HBeAg positive, 23% had cirrhosis, and mean HBV DNA level was 6.88 ± 1.74 log₁₀ IU/mL. Ninety‐two per cent became HBV DNA negative; 71% of HBeAg+ve patients became HBeAg negative and 68% anti‐HBe positive; 14% became HBsAg negative and 13% anti‐HBs positive. At the end of the study, 36 patients discontinued treatment: one due to breakthrough associated with resistant variants and 35 (20%) due to sustained virological response; 33 of these patients developed HBeAg seroconversion and 18 HBsAg seroconversion. Median off‐treatment time was 69 weeks. Nine patients (26%), all HBeAg positive at baseline, developed virological relapse after a median 48 weeks off‐treatment, 3 of them showed HBeAg reversion and 4 lost anti‐HBe. No patient with HBsAg seroconversion relapsed. HBeAg clearance after week 48 of treatment was associated with an increase risk of relapse. After ETV discontinuation, HBsAg seroconversion was maintained in 100% of the patients, HBeAg seroconversion maintained in 90%, and virological relapse rate was 24%.     

替诺福韦酯和恩替卡韦对慢性乙型肝炎初治患者疗效的荟萃分析

目的评价替诺福韦酯(TDF)和恩替卡韦(ETV)对慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)初治患者抗病毒的疗效及安全性。方法对2006年1月至2016年10月在国际生物医学期刊有关TDF和ETV治疗CHB的临床研究进行质量评价,并对相关文献进行荟萃分析。结果共纳入6篇文献。荟萃分析结果显示ETV和TDF抗病毒治疗的HBV DNA转阴率差异无统计学意义[48周时的RR=1.19,95%CI=1.09~1.30;96周时的RR=1.08,95%CI=1.02~1.14];两种药物的ALT复常率及HBeAg血清学转换率同样差异无统计学意义;且两种药物长期使用安全性良好,未观察到严重不良反应。结论 ETV和TDF对CHB核苷(酸)类药物初治患者抗病毒疗效相似,但仍需进一步观察远期治疗的安全性。     

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks: a randomized controlled trial

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has demonstrated long‐term efficacy and a high barrier to resistance in multiple chronic hepatitis B (CHB) populations outside of China. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TDF compared with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in Chinese patients with CHB during 48 weeks of treatment (ClinicalTrial.gov number, NCT01300234). A Phase 3, multicentred, randomized, double‐blind, controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of TDF with ADV in Chinese patients with CHB. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <400 copies/mL in each treatment group at Week 48, using an unpooled Z‐test for superiority. Secondary endpoints included viral suppression, serologic response, histological improvement, normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and the emergence of resistance mutations. A total of 509 patients, 202 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive and 307 HBeAg‐negative, with HBV DNA ≥10⁵ copies/mL received either TDF 300 mg od or ADV 10 mg od. At Week 48, TDF demonstrated superior viral suppression compared with ADV in both HBeAg‐positive (76.7% vs 18.2%, P < 0.0001) and HBeAg‐negative (96.8% vs 71.2%, P < 0.0001) patients. The majority of patients in both treatment arms achieved ALT normalization (>85%). No resistance to TDF was observed. The frequency of adverse events was comparable between treatment arms (TDF 3.9% vs ADV 4.8%). In this double‐blind, randomized, clinical trial, TDF demonstrated superiority over ADV with respect to viral suppression in Chinese patients with CHB at 48 weeks of treatment and without the development of resistance.     

Interferon‐α treatment in children and young adults with chronic hepatitis B: a long‐term follow‐up study in Taiwan

Background/Aims: The short‐ and long‐term benefits of interferon (IFN)‐α therapy in young patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) acquiring infection perinatally or during early childhood have been questioned. Methods: Twenty‐one Taiwanese hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)‐positive CHB patients aged 1.8–21.8 years (median 14.0 years) with alanine aminotransferase (ALT)>80 IU/L at entry were enrolled for IFN‐α therapy. They received IFN‐α therapy with a dose of 3 MU/m²/day three times a week for 24 weeks. A control group included untreated 21 CHB patients closely matched for gender, age, duration of ALT >80 IU/L and HBeAg status. All 42 patients were prospectively followed for 6.5–12.5 years after the end of therapy. Results: The cumulative rate of virological response [anti‐HBe seroconversion and serum hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐DNA <10⁵ copies/ml] was not different between the IFN‐treated patients and control patients at 1 year (41 vs 44%) and at 6 years (88 vs 89%) after stopping treatment. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen loss occurred in two (9.5%) treated patients and in one (4.8%) control patient. Patients with a successful treatment response (anti‐HBe seroconversion, HBV‐DNA <10² copies/ml and ALT normalization at 1 year after stopping treatment) were younger than those without a successful response (P=0.03). A lower pretreatment serum HBV‐DNA level (<2 × 10⁸ copies/ml) is not only a significant factor to predict successful treatment response (P=0.008) but also has a beneficial effect on the long‐term cumulative rate of virological response in IFN‐treated patients (P=0.021), but not in control patients. Genotype difference or emergence of a precore stop codon mutant before treatment was not predictive for HBeAg clearance. Conclusion: For young CHB patients in Taiwan with infection occurring perinatally or in early childhood, the real advantage of IFN‐α therapy was not observed. IFN‐α therapy showed a beneficial effect on short‐ and long‐term virological outcomes only in those with a lower pretreatment serum HBV‐DNA level.     

Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir with hepatitis B immunoglobulin in liver transplant patients

Potent nucleos(t)ide analogues and hepatitis B immunoglobulin combinations are recommended after liver transplantation to prevent the recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Despite its proven efficacy, the renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has not been well established in liver transplant recipients. We aimed to assess the impacts of TDF and entecavir (ETV) on tubular and glomerular functions. We analysed 206 liver transplant patients treated with TDF (n = 102) or ETV (n = 104) plus hepatitis B immunoglobulin. Serum creatinine, phosphate and uric acid levels were measured. Proximal tubular dysfunction was defined as the presence of hypophosphatemia (<2 mg/dL) and hypouricemia (<2 mg/dL). Glomerular dysfunction was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73 m² accompanied by a ≥25% eGFR decline from baseline. During a median follow‐up of 42.5 months, 48 patients developed proximal tubular dysfunction (30.4% and 16.3% in the TDF and ETV groups; P = .017). Serum levels of phosphate and uric acid were significantly lower in the TDF group post‐LT. TDF (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.16‐4.69; P = .017) and low body mass index (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.06‐4.21; P = .034) were independent risk factors for proximal tubular dysfunction. The prevalence of glomerular dysfunction was not significantly different between the two groups (TDF 51.0% and ETV 54.8%; P = .582). TDF significantly increased the risk of proximal tubular dysfunction. Although the effect of TDF on glomerular function was comparable to that of ETV, glomerular dysfunction was common after liver transplant.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma risk in HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B patients with or without cirrhosis treated with entecavir: HepNet.Greece cohort

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may still develop in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients treated with lamivudine. Whether HCC rates are comparable in patients treated with the current first‐line antivirals remains uncertain. We estimated the incidence and evaluated predictors of HCC in a large nationwide prospective cohort (HepNet.Greece) of HBeAg‐negative CHB patients treated with entecavir. HBeAg‐negative CHB patients from the same cohort who were initially treated with lamivudine were used as controls. We included 321 patients treated with entecavir for a median of 40 months and 818 patients treated initially with lamivudine for a median of 60 months. In the entecavir group, HCC developed in 4 of 321 (1.2%) patients at a median of 1.5 (range: 1.0–4.5) years, while the cumulative HCC incidence was significantly higher in cirrhotics than noncirrhotics (1, 3, 5 years: 0%, 3%, 9% vs 1%, 1%, 1%; P = 0.024) and in older patients (P = 0.026). Entecavir compared with lamivudine group patients had lower HCC incidence (1, 3, 5 years: 0.3%, 1.2%, 2.8% vs 0.7%, 3.8%, 5.6%; P = 0.024). However, in multivariable Cox regression analysis, the HCC risk was independently associated with older age (P < 0.001), male gender (P = 0.011) and cirrhosis (P = 0.025), but not with the initial agent. In conclusion , our large nationwide study indicates that the HCC risk remains increased in entecavir‐treated HBeAg‐negative CHB patients with cirrhosis, particularly of older age, at least for the first 5 years. The HCC risk does not seem to be significantly reduced with entecavir compared with antiviral therapy starting with lamivudine.     

Unconventional T cells in chronic hepatitis B patients on long‐term suppressive therapy with tenofovir followed by a Peg‐IFN add‐on strategy: A randomized study

HBV eradication in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) subjects is rarely achieved with either nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) or pegylated interferon (Peg‐IFN), which both have a limited effect in restoring immune responses. Thirty CHB subjects on long‐term treatment with tenofovir (TDF) and HBV suppression were enrolled and randomized 1:2 to either receive Peg‐IFN‐α‐2a add‐on therapy or continue TDF alone. We studied γδ T and iNKT frequency and function (by flow cytometry) at baseline, at 12 weeks and 12 weeks after the end of treatment. A higher reduction in qHBsAg occurred in the add‐on group compared with the NA group at W12 (P = .016) and at W24 (P = .012). A decline of qHBsAg ≥0.5 log₁₀ at week 24 occurred in 4 of 10 patients in the add‐on arm and 1 of 20 in the NA arm, respectively (P = .03). HBsAg loss was seen in 20% of subjects in the add‐on group and in none of the NA group. Compared to HBV negative, CHB on TDF showed lower frequency of iNKT (P = .03) and γδ T cells (P = .03) as well as fewer γδ T cells expressing Vδ2 T‐cell receptors (P = .005). No changes in unconventional T‐cell frequency and function were shown in both add‐on and NA patients nor were differences detected between the two treatment groups. We report persistent impairment of unconventional T cells in CHB. Despite a greater qHBsAg decline of add‐on patients, our data failed to detect any effect of Peg‐IFN treatment on unconventional T cells.     

Predictors of sustained functional cure in hepatitis B envelope antigen‐negative patients achieving hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance with interferon‐alpha–based therapy

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is considered a functional cure in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the durability of HBsAg loss after stopping treatment remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the sustained functional cure achieved by interferon therapy in hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)‐negative CHB patients. In this prospective study, 176 HBeAg‐negative CHB patients with functional cure were enrolled for 12 weeks of cessation treatment, and treatment information and baseline data were collected. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) biomarkers and clinical biochemical indicators were evaluated every 3 months; liver imaging examinations were performed every 3‐6 months during the 48‐week follow‐up. The sustained functional cure was evaluated. After the 48‐week follow‐up, the sustained functional cure rate was 86.63%. The cumulative rates of HBsAg reversion and HBV DNA reversion were 12.79% and 2.33%, respectively. Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks after HBsAg loss achieved a significantly higher rate of sustained functional cure and significantly lower rate of HBsAg reversion than consolidation treatment < 12 weeks (76.19% vs 90.00%, P = 0.022 and 23.81% vs 9.23%, P = 0.014, respectively). Patients with hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) had higher rate of sustained functional cure than patients achieving HBsAg loss but without HBsAb (89.86% vs 73.53%, P = 0.012). Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 16.478; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.135‐127.151; P = 0.007) and high HBsAb levels (OR 8.312; 95% CI, 1.824‐37.881; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of sustained functional cure. Results suggested that 12 weeks of consolidation therapy after HBsAg clearance and elevated HBsAb levels help to improve functional cure.     

替诺福韦酯单独与联合恩替卡韦挽救治疗恩替卡韦治疗拉米夫定经治慢性乙型肝炎失败患者疗效比较

目的比较替诺福韦酯单药与联合恩替卡韦对恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎拉米夫定经治患者仍应答不佳或发生病毒学突破的挽救方案的临床疗效及安全性。方法将80例恩替卡韦序贯治疗仍效果欠佳的拉米夫定经治慢性乙型肝炎患者随机分为单药组40例和联合组40例。单药组给予替诺福韦酯(300 mg/d)替换治疗;联合组使用替诺福韦酯(300 mg/d)和恩替卡韦(0.5 mg/d)治疗。所有患者均治疗48周,检测基线,治疗12、24和48周时病毒学、生化学、血清学指标。比较两组患者上述治疗时间点的完全病毒学应答率、ALT复常率、病毒学突破率和HBeAg血清学转换率及观察药物不良反应。结果单药组患者治疗48周后完全病毒学应答率、ALT复常率、病毒学突破率、HBeAg血清学转换率分别为85.0%(34/40)、76.2%(16/21)、0、13.1%(3/23),联合组分别为87.5%(35/40)、77.3%(17/22)、0、16.0%(41/25),两组比较差异无统计学意义(均P0.05)。两组患者耐受性均良好,无一例出现严重不良反应而导致停药。结论对于恩替卡序贯治疗后仍应答不佳或发生病毒学突破的拉米夫定经治慢性乙型肝炎患者,替诺福韦酯单药替换恩替卡韦的挽救治疗仍能有效抑制HBV DNA复制,是一种行之有效的优化治疗方案。