Integrating an interprofessional education initiative: Evidence from King Abdulaziz University

Abstract

Purpose: This paper examines current issues with interprofessional education (IPE) at King Abdulaziz University (KAU) and discusses initiatives for integrating IPE into the medical curricula at KAU.

Methods: We reviewed the current body of literature, studied reports from IPE conferences and workshops organized at KAU, and synthesized participants' feedback from the IPE programs, including an online survey.

Results: A total of 506 participants responded to the online survey. Respondents rated Interprofessional Collaborative Learning as the highest category of IPE, followed by Interprofessional Self-Improvement and Interprofessional Relationship. A hybrid conceptual framework is proposed, to tackle the issue of role clarification across all healthcare colleges at KAU. This proposition was found to be necessary due to the current state of the undergraduate curriculum which does not prepare students properly for professional collaboration.

Conclusions: The hybrid model may narrow the gap in IPE by emphasizing professional identity while reducing autonomy. Recommendations toward IPE are presented. Challenges toward IPE reform are discussed in the context of implementation at KAU and at other medical schools in the region.     

Using a meta-ethnographic approach to explore the nature of facilitation and teaching approaches employed in interprofessional education

Background: Interprofessional facilitators and teachers are regarded as central to the effective delivery of interprofessional education (IPE). As the IPE literature continues to expand, most studies have focused on reporting learner outcomes, with little attention paid to IPE facilitation. However, a number of studies have recently emerged reporting on this phenomenon.

Aim: To present a synthesis of qualitative evidence on the facilitation of IPE, using a meta-ethnographic approach.

Methods: Electronic databases and journals were searched for the past 10 years. Of the 2164 abstracts initially found, 94 full papers were reviewed and subsequently 12 papers were included. Teams of two reviewers independently completed each step in the review process. The quality of these papers was assessed using a modified critical appraisal checklist.

Results: Seven key concepts embedded in the included studies were synthesized into three main factors which provided an insight into the nature of IPE facilitation. Specifically, the synthesis found that IPE facilitation is influenced by “contextual characteristics”; “facilitator experiences”; and the “use of different facilitation strategies”.

Conclusions: IPE facilitation is a complex activity affected by contextual, experiential and pedagogical factors. Further research is needed to explore the effects of these factors on the delivery of IPE.     

Student participation in the development of interprofessional education courses: Perceptions and experiences of faculty members and the students

Abstract

Introduction: Student participation has shown positive effects on the curriculum development process for a single health profession. This qualitative study explores faculty members’ and students’ perceptions and experiences regarding student participation in interprofessional course development.

Methods: Interprofessional courses were developed and implemented by interprofessional teams of faculty members and students. Two focus group discussions were carried out: one with faculty members and one with students.

Results: Students contributed to both the process and the results of interprofessional course development in a complementary manner. Student participation was facilitated via motivation for and through work on interprofessional education, a balance between clarity on tasks and students’ autonomy, and a low-hierarchy team atmosphere. Students developed professionally, and faculty members saw them as future ambassadors for interprofessional collaboration.

Conclusions: This study provides multiple qualitative evidence for a positive, complementary role of student participation in interprofessional course development. A number of factors were identified that should be nurtured to facilitate this effect. Our findings may stimulate and guide other schools to actively involve students in the development of interprofessional education.     

Students’ motivation for interprofessional collaboration after their experience on an IPE ward: A qualitative analysis framed by self-determination theory

Purpose: Interprofessional Education (IPE) may depend for its success not only on cognitive gains of learners, but also on affective and motivational benefits. According to Self-Determination Theory (SDT), a major motivation theory, autonomy (feeling of choice), competence (feeling of capability), and relatedness (feeling of belonging) drive motivation in a way that can improve performance. We investigated which elements of IPE in a clinical ward potentially influence students’ feelings in these three areas.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 students from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and physical therapy attending a three-week IPE ward and analyzed the data using a realist approach. Two researchers independently identified meaning units using open coding. Thirteen themes were synthesized. Next, meaning units, expressing autonomy, competence, or relatedness were discerned.

Results: Students appeared motivated for an IPE ward, with its authentic situations making them feel responsible to actively contribute to care plans, by understanding how professions differ in their contributions and analytic approach and by informal contact with other professions, enhanced by a dedicated physical space for team meetings.

Conclusion: Students valued the IPE ward experience and autonomous motivation for IPE was triggered. They mentioned practical ways to incorporate what they learned in future interprofessional collaboration, e.g. in next placements.     

Development of a phenomenologically derived method to assess affective learning in student journals following impactive educational experiences

Background: Assessment of affective learning (AL) is difficult but important, particularly for health professional students, where it is intimately linked to the development of professional values. This study originally aimed to determine whether an emotionally impactive, extended, multimethod, interprofessional simulation experience enhanced the AL of senior medical students, compared to conventional seminars and workshops alone. This necessitated the development of a method to assess for the presence and quality of AL.

Methods: We developed a “double hermeneutic” method, derived from Smith’s Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, to identify examples of AL, according to Krathwohl’s hierarchy (“receiving,” “responding,” “valuing,” “organization,” “characterization”), in the journals of students from each arm of a randomized educational trial. Three assessors rated the highest level of AL seen in each journal and then we compared ratings from the two study arms.

Results: A total of 135 journals were available for assessment (81 Intervention, 54 Control). The method proved to be effective in identifying and characterizing examples of uniprofessional and interprofessional AL. The median level identified in Intervention journals (“valuing”) was significantly higher than Control journals (“responding,” p?Conclusions: The method described provides a means to assess affective learning among health professional students. An extended, immersive simulation experience appears to enhance affective learning.     

The stories they tell: How third year medical students portray patients,family members,physicians, and themselves in difficult encounters

Background: Physicians have long had patients whom they have labeled “difficult”, but little is known about how medical students perceive difficult encounters with patients.

Methods: In this study, we analyzed 134 third year medical students’ reflective essays written over an 18-month period about difficult student–patient encounters. We used a qualitative computerized software program, Atlas.ti to analyze students’ observations and reflections.

Results: Main findings include that students described patients who were angry and upset; noncompliant with treatment plans; discussed “nonmedical” problems; fearful, worried, withdrawn, or “disinterested” in their health. Students often described themselves as anxious, uncertain, confused, and frustrated. Nevertheless, they saw themselves behaving in empathic and patient-centered ways while also taking refuge in “standard” behaviors not necessarily appropriate to the circumstances. Students rarely mentioned receiving guidance from attendings regarding how to manage these challenging interactions.

Conclusions: These third-year medical students recognized the importance of behaving empathically in difficult situations and often did so. However, they often felt overwhelmed and frustrated, resorting to more reductive behaviors that did not match the needs of the patient. Students need more guidance from attending physicians in order to approach difficult interactions with specific problem-solving skills while maintaining an empathic, patient-centered context.     

Interprofessional conflict and conflict management in an educational setting

Abstract

Background: Whenever health professionals work together as a team, conflict is inevitable – some would argue even necessary. However, conflict can have negative effects on patient care, job satisfaction, personal wellness, and professional productivity.

Purpose: This study aims to describe interprofessional conflicts in a hospital setting from the perspective of three groups of health science students.

Methods: An online questionnaire survey collected data from 225 health science students (medicine, nursing, and social work) in Northern California (USA). Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted resulting in seven central themes of conflict.

Results: There are differences among health professional students in terms of how conflict is experienced and managed. Nursing students and medical students were more likely to take on the “victim” role when explaining their conflict, and their conflicts were more likely to be intra-professional. The most common cause of conflicts was related to hierarchy and power issues. The majority were dissatisfied with the way the conflict was resolved.

Conclusions: Findings from this study can be used to design interprofessional curriculum to improve outcomes from conflicts and improve wellbeing, job satisfaction, and reduce patient turnover.     

A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39

Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) aims to bring together different professionals to learn with, from, and about one another in order to collaborate more effectively in the delivery of safe, high-quality care for patients/clients. Given its potential for improving collaboration and care delivery, there have been repeated calls for the wider-scale implementation of IPE across education and clinical settings. Increasingly, a range of IPE initiatives are being implemented and evaluated which are adding to the growth of evidence for this form of education.

Aim: The overall aim of this review is to update a previous BEME review published in 2007. In doing so, this update sought to synthesize the evolving nature of the IPE evidence.

Methods: Medline, CINAHL, BEI, and ASSIA were searched from May 2005 to June 2014. Also, journal hand searches were undertaken. All potential abstracts and papers were screened by pairs of reviewers to determine inclusion. All included papers were assessed for methodological quality and those deemed as “high quality” were included. The presage–process–product (3P) model and a modified Kirkpatrick model were employed to analyze and synthesize the included studies.

Results: Twenty-five new IPE studies were included in this update. These studies were added to the 21 studies from the previous review to form a complete data set of 46 high-quality IPE studies. In relation to the 3P model, overall the updated review found that most of the presage and process factors identified from the previous review were further supported in the newer studies. In regard to the products (outcomes) reported, the results from this review continue to show far more positive than neutral or mixed outcomes reported in the included studies. Based on the modified Kirkpatrick model, the included studies suggest that learners respond well to IPE, their attitudes and perceptions of one another improve, and they report increases in collaborative knowledge and skills. There is more limited, but growing, evidence related to changes in behavior, organizational practice, and benefits to patients/clients.

Conclusions: This updated review found that key context (presage) and process factors reported in the previous review continue to have resonance on the delivery of IPE. In addition, the newer studies have provided further evidence for the effects on IPE related to a number of different outcomes. Based on these conclusions, a series of key implications for the development of IPE are offered.     

A review of interprofessional training wards: Enhancing student learning and patient outcomes

Background: In an interprofessional training ward (ITW), students from different health professions collaboratively perform patient care with the goal of improving patient care. In the past two decades, ITWs have been established world-wide and studies have investigated their benefits. We aimed to compare ITWs with respect to their logistics, interprofessional learning outcomes and patient outcomes.

Methods: We explored PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE (1990–June 2017) and included articles focusing on interprofessional, in-patient training wards with student teams of medical and other health professions students. Two independent reviewers screened studies for eligibility and extracted data.

Results: Thirty-seven articles from twelve different institutions with ITWs were included. ITWs world-wide are organized similarly with groups of 2–12 students (i.e. medical, nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and pharmacy) being involved in patient care, usually for a period of two weeks. However, the type of clinical ward and the way supervisors are trained differ.

Conclusions: ITWs show promising results in short-term student learning outcomes and patient satisfaction rates. Future ITW studies should measure students’ long-term interprofessional competencies using standardized tools. Furthermore, a research focus on the impact of ITWs on patient satisfaction and relevant patient care outcomes is important.     

Two birds with one stone: addressing interprofessional education aims and objectives in health profession curricula through interdisciplinary cultural competency training

Interprofessional education (IPE) is acknowledged as important in producing health care profession graduates able to work collaboratively with colleagues from other health professions. There are, however, a range of obstacles to development of effective IPE programmes. Differing health professional cultures and socialisation processes have been identified as two potential barriers. This article notes considerable alignment between the broad aims and objectives of IPE and those of cultural competency training. It suggests that in the course of acquiring values, attitudes and skills consistent with a culturally competent practitioner, students may simultaneously develop a capacity to apply these same skills and attributes to their relationships with students (and future colleagues) from other health professions. This article draws on the concept of inerprofessional cultural competence (CC; Pecukonis, E., Doyle, O. & Bliss, D.L. (2008). Reducing barriers to interprofessional training: promoting interprofessional cultural competence. J Interprofessional Care, 22(4), 417-428), noting that interdisciplinary CC training delivered early in undergraduate years may be an effective vehicle for meeting IPE aims and objectives, and examining an example of this in practice. This article suggests that interdisciplinary programmes developed to jointly meet CC and IPE aims and objectives may provide a platform for fostering interprofessional tolerance, promoting shared values and discouraging the formation of interprofessional barriers as students are socialised into their professional cultures.     

Evaluating an interprofessional education curriculum: A theory-informed approach

Background: This paper retrospectively reports on an evaluation framework applied to a local interprofessional education (IPE) curriculum design. The theoretically informed IPE curriculum spans the undergraduate health and social care programmes of over 10 professions as a curriculum theme. The teaching design and its impact were informed by psycho-social and learning theories.

Aims: This meta-analysis is presented to share the importance of longitudinal IPE, whole curriculum evaluation for comparisons and to advance our understandings of what works and why.

Method: The meta-analysis used the Presage, Process and Product conceptual framework outlined by Biggs in 1993, and the Kirkpatrick in 1996, evaluation outcome model. Data are shared on the final overall learning from evaluating the teaching and the outcomes from students, teachers, practitioners, patients and carers.

Results: The evaluation highlighted cyclical issues relating to students experiences, facilitators abilities and highlights the challenges of learning in practice which was highly praised by students. The problems and challenges were solved through the application of theory to illuminate our understandings.

Conclusion: We lament at missed opportunities for the application of theoretically informed research questions that still require to be addressed. However, we share this framework as having offered a complete and comprehensive evaluation process.     

Exploring the feasibility and acceptability of using tactical decision games to develop final year medical students’ non-technical skills

Introduction: Clinical decision-making, situation awareness, task management, and teamwork are key non-technical skills (NTS) required by junior doctors. Tactical decision games (TDGs) are low-fidelity classroom-based activities designed to develop proficiency in NTS. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of using TDGs as a novel teaching method for final year medical students.

Methods: Final year medical students at the University of Edinburgh participated in a single TDG session. Focus groups were then used to explore students’ perceptions of participating in the TDG session and transcribed data from the focus groups was thematically analyzed.

Results: Six key themes emerged from the data: “the value of non-medical games”; “giving and receiving feedback”; “observing and reflecting”; “recognizing and understanding NTS”; “dealing with uncertainty and ambiguity”, and “introducing TDGs into the curriculum”.

Conclusions: TDGs are an easy-to-use, low-fidelity method of teaching medical students about the importance of NTS. Medical students view TDGs as a valuable learning activity that appears to increase awareness and understanding of the importance of NTS.     

Grappling with complexity: Medical students’ reflective writings about challenging patient encounters as a window into professional identity formation

Aim: Clerkship-specific interactive reflective writing (IRW)-enhanced reflection may enhance professional identity formation (PIF), a fundamental goal of medical education. PIF process as revealed in students? reflective writing (RW) has been understudied.

Methods: The authors developed an IRW curriculum within a Family Medicine Clerkship (FMC) and analyzed students? reflections about challenging/difficult patient encounters using immersion-crystallization qualitative analysis.

Results: The qualitative analysis identified 26 unique emergent themes and five distinct thematic categories (1. Role of emotions, 2. Role of cognition, 3. Behaviorally responding to situational context, 4. Patient factors, and 5. External factors) as well as an emergent PIF model from a directed content analysis. The model describes students? backgrounds, emotions and previous experiences in medicine merging with external factors and processed during student?patient interactions. The RWs also revealed that processing often involves polarities (e.g. empathy/lack of empathy or encouragement/disillusionment) as well as dissonance between idealized visions and lived reality.

Conclusions: IRW facilitates and ideally supports grappling with the lived reality of medicine; uncovering a “positive hidden curriculum” within medical education. The authors propose engaging learners in guided critical reflection about complex experiences for meaning-making within a safe learning climate as a valuable way to cultivate reflective, resilient professionals with “prepared” minds and hearts for inevitable challenges of healthcare practice.     

Community of practice and student interaction at an acute medical ward: An ethnographic study

Background: A deeper understanding is needed of the acute medical care setting as a learning environment for students.

Aim: To explore workplace culture of an acute medical ward and students’ interactions within this community.

Method: An ethnographic design was applied. Medical and nurse students’ interactions were observed and informal questioning performed. Field notes were transcribed and analysed qualitatively, inspired by Wengers’ “Community of practice” theory.

Results: We identified four characteristics that regulated how students adapt and interact in the community of practice. Complex and stressful situations were stabilized by routines and carriers of culture. Variable composition and roles of community members were a part of the daily routine but did not seam obvious to students. Transitions through community boundaries were confusing especially for new students. Levels of importance and priority: Hierarchies and orders of priority were present as regulators of roles, routines and interactions, and of how staff approach different patient groups.

Conclusion: The culture shaped a pattern for, and created prerequisites that challenged students’ adaptation and created a space for learning. Students’ task on arrival was to enter the semipermeable membrane of the community of practice and to understand and adapt to its culture, and try to become accepted.     

Medical educators: How they define themselves – Results of an international web survey

Background: Little is known about medical educators’ self-definition.

Aims: The aim of this study is to survey an international community of medical educators focusing on the medical educators’ self-definition.

Methods: Within a comprehensive, web-based survey, an open question on the participants’ views of how they would define a “medical educator” was sent to 2200 persons on the mailing list of the Association for Medical Education in Europe. The free text definitions were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis.

Results: Of the, 2200 medical educators invited to participate, 685 (31.1%) provided a definition of a “medical educator”. The qualitative analysis of the free text definitions revealed that medical educators defined themselves in 13 roles, primarily as “Professional Expert”, “Facilitator”, “Information Provider”, “Enthusiast”, “Faculty Developer”, “Mentor”, “Undergraduate and Postgraduate Trainer”, “Curriculum Developer”, “Assessor and Assessment Creator”, and “Researcher”.

Conclusions: Our survey revealed that medical educators predominantly define themselves as “Professional Experts” and identified 12 further self-defined roles of a medical educator, several of which not to have been reported previously. The results can be used to further the understanding of our professional identity.     

Development of cognitive processing and judgments of knowledge in medical students: Analysis of progress test results

Background: Beside acquiring knowledge, medical students should also develop the ability to apply and reflect on it, requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Ideally, students should have reached higher-order cognitive processing when they enter the clinical program. Whether this is the case, is unknown. We investigated students’ cognitive processing, and awareness of their knowledge during medical school.

Methods: Data were gathered from 347 first-year preclinical and 196 first-year clinical students concerning the 2008 and 2011 Dutch progress tests. Questions were classified based upon Bloom’s taxonomy: “simple questions” requiring lower and “vignette questions” requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Subsequently, we compared students’ performance and awareness of their knowledge in 2008 to that in 2011 for each question type.

Results: Students’ performance on each type of question increased as students progressed. Preclinical and first-year clinical students performed better on simple questions than on vignette questions. Third-year clinical students performed better on vignette questions than on simple questions. The accuracy of students’ judgment of knowledge decreased over time.

Conclusions: The progress test is a useful tool to assess students’ cognitive processing and awareness of their knowledge. At the end of medical school, students achieved higher-order cognitive processing but their awareness of their knowledge had decreased.     

Interprofessional learning experiences: Exploring the perception and attitudes of Saudi Arabian medical and dental students

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the awareness and attitudes of medical and dental students regarding interprofessional learning (IPL).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 278 female undergraduate Medical and Dental students from Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh. These students undertook IPL in the Foundation block, in basic science teaching, clinical skills’ laboratories and in professionalism and learning skills’ modules. A modified, validated RIPLS questionnaire with four subscales and 29 items was used to collect data regarding their perception and attitudes towards shared learning. A five-point Likert scale was used with a value ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) for each item. Factor analysis was done using Varimox rotation. Student’s t test was applied to detect difference between mean scores of medical and dental student’s responses

Results: The mean age of respondents was 19.8?±?1.7?years with the majority in the second year of each program. There was no difference in mean responses of the medical and dental students. The respondents favored shared learning in the areas of professional skills and patient care. They agreed that IPL helps to develop respect, trust and appreciation for other professions; however, both groups preferred to learn uni-professionally with regard to developing discrete professional identities and roles.

Conclusions: There is an overall positive response towards IPL and the value of team work; however, more attention needs to be paid to enabling students to learn about the specific roles of each profession in the healthcare team.     

Students as catalysts for curricular innovation: A change management framework

Abstract

Introduction: The role of medical students in catalyzing and leading curricular change in US medical schools is not well described. Here, American Medical Association student and physician leaders in the Accelerating Change in Medical Education initiative use qualitative methods to better define student leadership in curricular change.

Methods: The authors developed case studies describing student leadership in curricular change efforts. Case studies were presented at a national medical education workshop; participants provided worksheet reflections and were surveyed, and responses were transcribed. Kotter’s change management framework was used to categorize reported student roles in curricular change. Thematic analysis was used to identify barriers to student engagement and activators to overcome these barriers.

Results: Student roles spanned all eight steps of Kotter’s change management framework. Barriers to student engagement were related to faculty (e.g. view student roles narrowly), students (e.g. fear change or expect faculty-led curricula), or both (e.g. lack leadership training). Activators were: (1) recruiting collaborative faculty, staff, and students; (2) broadening student leadership roles; (3) empowering student leaders; and (4) recognizing student successes.

Conclusions: By applying these activators, medical schools can build robust student–faculty partnerships that maximize collaboration, moving students beyond passive educational consumption to change agency and curricular co-creation.     

Preparing educators for adaptive education (AE) programs

Abstract

Context: There has long been awareness that educational experiences should be individualized. In the health professions, this tenet remains inconsistently implemented. Adapting to the widely diverse characteristics of different learners requires educators who are prepared for planning and implementing adaptive education (AE).

Rationale: Learning experiences, for both educators and health professions students, can be substantially enhanced by mirroring clinical care, where we respect the uniqueness of each person and increasingly approach care as a collaboration. We are continuously “diagnostic,” striving to understand our patients’ clinical and life circumstances, adjusting to new findings. Learners are also unique in multiple, relevant ways. They deserve educators who work with them collaboratively and “diagnostically,” adapting to changing information.

Implementation: Until recently, having educational programs that adapt to learner uniqueness was logistically and economically unrealistic. Now, thanks to deeper understandings of the learning process and new technologies, individualization is feasible. Here, we focus on the foundation step of preparing educators.

Educator development: Suitably prepared educators are indispensable to success in becoming appropriately adaptive to learners’ needs. For some educators, becoming more adaptive can be contrary to long-held assumptions and habits. We offer recommendations for effective educator development, without which authentic AE is unlikely.