Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound: minimally invasive therapy of localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Criteria for determining the durability of the response to transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of prostate cancer have been established by calculating progression-free probability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 82 patients (mean age 71 +/- 5.7 years) with biopsy-proven localized (stage T1-T2) cancer who were not suitable candidates for radical surgery underwent transfectal HIFU ablation with the Ablatherm machine. The mean follow-up was 17.6 months (range 3-68 months). The mean serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) value and mean prostate volume were 8.11 +/- 4.64 ng/mL and 34.9 +/- 17.4 cm3, respectively. Progression was rigidly defined as any positive biopsy result, regardless of PSA concentration, or three successive PSA increases for patients with a negative biopsy (PSA velocity > or = 0.75). Times to specific events (positive biopsy and PSA elevation) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier survival method. RESULTS: Overall, 62% of the patients exhibited no evidence of disease progression 60 months after transrectal HIFU ablation. In particular, the disease-free rate was 68% for the moderate-risk group of 50 patients (PSA < 15.0 ng/mL, Gleason sum < 8, prostate volume < 40 cm3, and number of positive biopsies < 5). For the low-risk group of 32 patients (PSA < 10 ng/mL and Gleason sum < 7), the disease-free survival rate was 83%. CONCLUSION: Transrectal HIFU prostate ablation is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with localized prostatic adenocarcinoma.     

First analysis of the long-term results with transrectal HIFU in patients with localised prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for patients with localised prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients included in this multicentre analysis had T1-T2 NxM0 prostate cancer, a PSA<15 ng/ml, and a Gleason score (GS) < or = 7, and were treated with prototypes or first-generation Ablatherm HIFU devices between October 1997 and August 2001. The Phoenix definition of biochemical failure was used (PSA nadir+2). Treatment failure was defined as: biochemical failure or positive biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients with a mean (SD) age 69.1 yr (6.6) were included. Mean (SD) follow-up was 6.4 yr (1.1). Control prostate biopsies were negative in 86.4% of patients. Median PSA nadir of 0.16 ng/ml (range, 0.0-9.1) was achieved at a mean (SD) of 4.9 mo (5.2). A PSA nadir < or = 0.5 ng/ml was recorded in 68.4% of patients. The actuarial biochemical failure-free survival rates (SR) at 5 and 7 yr were 77% and 69%, respectively. The actuarial disease-free SR at 5 and 7 yr were 66% and 59%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effective long-term cancer control achieved with HIFU in patients with low- or intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer.     

Control of prostate cancer by transrectal HIFU in 227 patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of localized prostate cancer with reference to disease-related prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with T1-2 localized prostate cancers, prostate specific antigen (PSA) 1 ng/ml with three consecutive rises. RESULTS: The study included 227 patients. Mean follow-up was 27+/-20 months (12-121 months). Eighty-six percent had negative control biopsies. Median nadir PSA was 0.10 ng/ml. The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival rate (DFSR), combining pathologic and biochemical outcomes, was 66%. DFSR showed a significant decrease when stratified according to initial PSA level: 90% with PSA 相似文献   

Transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: factors influencing the outcome

OBJECTIVES: Efficacy evaluation of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for localized prostate cancer and identification of the factors affecting the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 102 patients with prostate cancer stage T1-T2 and noncandidates for radical prostatectomy have been treated with HIFU (Ablatherm, EDAP-Technomed). The disease progression (failure) was strictly defined by any positive sample at control biopsies, whatever the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, or by 3 consecutive increases in PSA levels in case of negative biopsies. RESULTS: At inclusion, patients' baseline characteristics were (mean +/- standard deviation): age 70.8 (+/-6.13) years, PSA 8.38 (+/-4.8) ng/ml, prostate volume 33.3 (+/-16.71) cm3. The population mean follow-up was 19 months (3-76 months). The overall success rate was 66%. Statistically significant variations of the overall success with a more favorable outcome were observed when (1) the initial PSA level was < or =10 ng/ml (73 vs. 50%, p = 0.02), (2) the Gleason score was < or =6 (81 vs. 46%, p<0.001) and (3) the pretreatment sextant biopsy evidenced 1-4 positive samples (68 vs. 40%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Results observed after HIFU treatment in localized prostate cancer are now challenging those obtained after radiation therapy. The success rate is influenced by disease-related prognostic factors.     

High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

The efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) used for the treatment of localized prostate cancers has been demonstrated over the past decade. We present our early results after HIFU used as a single session in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. A total of 58 patients were treated using the Ablatherm HIFU device with or without transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). HIFU failure was defined as the presence of a cancer remnant on repeated biopsies or three consecutive increases in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/=1.0 ng/ml. The mean follow-up was 14 months (range, 6-21 months). After HIFU treatment, 78% of patients had a decreased PSA level to <0.5 ng/ml within 3 months. The median value of the last PSA was 0.6 ng/ml and the median nadir PSA was 0.2 ng/ml. The success rates of HIFU were 85, 77 and 47% in low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. The HIFU failure rate was closely associated with clinical stage, presence of cancer on TURP chips and nadir PSA on univariate analysis. However, the only significant predictor for HIFU failure was the nadir PSA value by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The operation-related complications were minimal. Although both the period and number of patients were limited to evaluate the clinical efficacy, HIFU appears to be a safe and effective treatment option in selected patients with prostate cancer.     

PSA nadir is a significant predictor of treatment failure after high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of localised prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To assess if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir is an independent predictor of treatment failure and disease-free survival after high-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for localised prostate cancer as defined by the new ASTRO criteria. METHODS: One hundred three patients after HIFU treatment (Ablatherm, EDAP, Lyon, France) for localised prostate cancer without previous hormonal therapy were evaluated retrospectively. Patients attended regular follow-up visits every 3 mo. Treatment failure was defined by the revised ASTRO criteria (PSA >or=2 ng/ml above nadir PSA, positive biopsy, if salvage treatment was administered). Patients were divided into three PSA nadir subgroups (group 1, 1 ng/ml). The disease-free survival rate (DFSR) was calculated by using life table methods. The log-rank test was used to compare the curves based on Kaplan-Meier models. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 4.9 (3-8.6) yr. Mean time to PSA nadir was 6.4+/-5.1 mo. A PSA nadir of 1ng/ml was reached by 64%, 22.3%, and 13.6% of patients, respectively. Treatment failure rates during follow-up were 4.5%, 30.4%, and 100%, respectively, for the three groups (p<0.001). The actuarial DFSRs at 5 yr were 95%, 55%, and 0%, respectively, for the 3 groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PSA nadir after HIFU correlates highly significantly with treatment failure and DFSR, and can be applied in daily clinical practice. Promising oncological outcome is obtained if a PSA nadir of 相似文献   

Commentary on “Salvage laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following high-intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of prostate cancer.” Leonardo L,Franco G,De Nunzio C,Tubaro A,Salvitti M,Tartaglia N,Simonelli G,De Dominicis C,Department of Urology,La Sapienza University of Rome,Italy : Urology 2012;80(1):130–3

ObjectiveTo test the feasibility and safety of salvage laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (sLRP) for recurrent prostate cancer after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment.MethodsThirteen men (median age 61.3 years) fulfilled the criteria of recurrent prostate cancer after HIFU undergoing sLRP with HIFU performed using Ablatherm devices (EDAP TMS, Lyon, France). The median interval from primary treatment and biochemical recurrence was 38 months, and the median serum PSA nadir after primary therapy was 1.05 ng\mL. Perioperative data and functional outcome were recorded for each patient. Complications were recorded and graded according to Clavien scale. The prostatectomy specimens were analyzed for Gleason score, extracapsular extension, and surgical margins. Mean follow-up was 14 months.ResultsThere was no perioperative mortality and no conversion to open surgery was necessary. Mean operation time was 220 minutes, mean blood loss was 150 mL, and none of the patients received any transfusion. On histopathologic evaluation, 8 patients had extracapsular extension (pT3a) and 5 patients had intracapsular disease (pT2b). Positive surgical margins (PSMs) were detected in 2 patients in the pT3a group. Gleason score was 7 (3 + 4) in 6 patients and (4 + 3) in 5 patients. Two patients had a Gleason score of 8. The median time to achieve continence was 6 months. Four patients showed mild incontinence and used 2 pads per day. None of the patients in our series were potent after sLRP.ConclusionsLRP is feasible for men in whom HIFU has failed but has a higher morbidity rate than primary surgery.     

Value of prostate-specific antigen in the staging of Taiwanese patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer

Records of 71 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were reviewed retrospectively regarding clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, CT scan of pelvis, bone scan, and pelvic lymph node dissection. Fourteen patients had pelvic lymphadenopathy based on the CT scan. Of these, no patient had a PSA level <4 ng/mL, 1 patient had a PSA level between 4 and 10 ng/mL, and 3 had a PSA level between 10 and 20 ng/mL. Twelve of 13 patients with positive bone scan results had a PSA level >20 ng/mL, and 1 patient had a PSA level between 10 and 20 ng/mL. PSA can be cost-effective in selecting and identifying appropriate staging for patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. CT scans are not indicated in men with clinical localized prostate cancer when PSA levels are < or =10 ng/mL. Bone scan is not required for staging asymptomatic men with PSA levels of < or =20 ng/mL. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for localized prostate cancer may not be necessary if PSA levels is < or =20 ng/mL and Gleason score is < or =5.     

Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a multicenter study

We report a multicenter trial with transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. A total of 72 consecutive patients with stage T1c-2NOM0 prostate cancer were treated using the Sonablate 500TM HIFU device (Focus Surgery, Indianapolis, USA). Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. The median age and prostate specific antigen (PSA) level were 72 years and 8.10 ng/ml, respectively. The median follow-up period for all patients was 14.0 months. Biochemical disease-free survival rates in all patients at 1 and 2 years were 78% and 76%, respectively. Biochemical disease-free survival rates in patients with stage T1c, T2a and T2b groups at 2 years were 89, 67% and 40% (p = 0.0817). Biochemical disease-free survival rates in patients with Gleason scores of 2-4, 5-7 and 8-10 at 2 years were 88, 72% and 80% (p = 0.6539). Biochemical disease-free survival rates in patients with serum PSA of less than 10 ng/ml and 10-20 ng/ml were 75% and 78% (p = 0.6152). No viable tumor cells were noted in 68% of patients by postoperative prostate needle biopsy. Prostatic volume was decreased from 24.2 ml to 14.0 ml at 6 months after HIFU (p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were noted in International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate and quality of life analysis with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy. HIFU therapy appears to be minimally invasive, efficacious and safe for patients with localized prostate cancer with pretreatment PSA levels less than 20 ng/ml.     

Short-term outcome after high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of patients with high-risk prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term outcome in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated by transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2003 to November 2004, 30 patients with high-risk prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective study; all had transurethral resection of the prostate before transrectal HIFU treatment, using the Ablatherm device (EDAP, Lyon, France) during the same session, associated with hormonal therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. After the procedure, all the patients were evaluated every 3 months by physical examination, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay and a continence questionnaire. The follow-up schedule also included a transperineal prostate biopsy 6 months after the treatment. All the patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: The HIFU treatment took a median (interquartile range, IQR) of 140 (100-160) min. No complications were reported during treatment. The mean (IQR) hospitalization was 2.2 (1-4) days, and the suprapubic drainage tube was removed after 12 (7-18) days. The complications after treatment were: urinary tract infections in five patients (16%), stenosis of the intraprostatic and membranous urethra in three (10%), and secondary infravesical obstruction in four (13%). At 12 months after the procedure, 28 patients (93%) were continent. Seven of the 30 men (23%) had a positive prostate biopsy. At the 1-year follow-up only three of the 30 patients with high-risk prostate cancer had a PSA level of >0.3 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU is a modern, minimally invasive therapy for prostate cancer, often used in selected patients with localized disease. The present results show that HIFU was also feasible in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The low complication rates and favourable functional outcome support the planning of further larger studies in such patients. The oncological efficacy of HIFU should be assessed in further studies with a longer follow-up.     

Oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis in male infertility: a clinical approach

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical outcomes of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as the sole therapy for localized prostate cancer, and to determine independent predictors of disease progression, as recent studies indicate an increasing use of ADT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of all patients with cT1-4NXM0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with ADT as the primary initial therapy at the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center between 1993 and 2000 were reviewed. Age, race, Charlson Health Index, family history, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density, digital rectal examination (DRE) findings, Gleason score, and percentage of positive biopsy cores at diagnosis were recorded for 81 patients. Patients had a median (SD, range) age of 73 (5.6, 58-84) years, a PSA level of 14.3 (34.6, 1.4-252) ng/mL and tumours were classified as Gleason score < or = 5 in 9% of patients, 6 in 31%, 7 in 31% and 8-10 in 30%. Outcomes extracted were PSA progression, PSA nadir, bone fractures, local progression, distant progression and overall survival. RESULTS: With a median (range) follow-up of 54 (6-115) months, the incidence of local progression, distant progression, bone fractures, PSA progression, and death were 10%, 7%, 25%, 21% and 41% respectively. The percentage of positive biopsy cores > or = 83%, age < 70 years, Gleason score > or = 7, abnormal DRE, and PSA nadir > or = 0.2 ng/mL were significantly associated with PSA progression by univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis identified age < 70 years (hazard ratio 6.52, 95% confidence interval 2.29-18.55) and Gleason score > or = 6 (4.0, 2.0-12.0) as independent risk factors for PSA progression. CONCLUSIONS: ADT resulted in modest control of localized prostate cancer, but younger patients and those with Gleason > or = 6 cancers were at higher risk of treatment failure. Toxicity, principally in the form of bone fractures, was high.     

The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection

To decrease side effects observed after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for localized prostate cancer and to re-establish normal micturition in a patient population that often presents with concomitant prostate enlargement, the impact of a combined transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and HIFU has been evaluated. TURP and HIFU treatments were performed under the same spinal anesthesia. For the HIFU treatments, the Ablatherm device (EDAP SA, Lyon, France) was used. Selection criteria for HIFU treatment were localized prostate cancer, no previous treatment for prostate cancer, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 15 ng/mL at diagnosis. All patients meeting these criteria were considered for treatment and analysis. PSA nadir and stability, histology, International Prostate Specific Score (IPSS) and IPSS-quality of life, and morbidity were assessed during follow-up; 271 patients were selected: 96 in the HIFU group and 175 in the TURP plus HIFU group. A statistically significant impact was observed on catheter time (40.0 days versus 7.0 in median), incontinence (15.4% versus 6.9%), urinary infection (47.9% versus 11.4%), and the evolution of the post-treatment IPSS (8.91 versus 3.37 in average) in favor of the TURP plus HIFU group. No significant changes were observed regarding efficacy during short-term follow-up when considering a 25% retreatment rate in the HIFU group versus a 4% retreatment rate in the TURP plus HIFU group. The combination of a TURP and HIFU treatment reduces the treatment-related morbidity significantly. The patient management after a combined TURP and HIFU treatment is comparable with the management after a single TURP.     

Intermittent androgen suppression in patients with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) in patients with prostate cancer and to try to define predictive factors for biochemical progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 2001, 146 patients received IAS as a primary treatment for localized, advanced or metastatic prostate cancer (72 men) or as a treatment for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and/or radiation therapy (74 men). Androgen-deprivation treatment (ADT) was continued up to 6 months after PSA became undetectable or a nadir PSA level was reached. ADT was then re-instituted when the PSA level was> 4 ng/mL for patients who had RP or> 10 ng/mL for the others. RESULTS: After a mean (range) follow-up of 45.6 (12-196.9) months, 24 patients had biochemical progression. These patients were younger than those with no biochemical progression (67 vs 72 years, P = 0.004) and had a statistically higher Gleason score (7.21 vs 6.52, P = 0.01) and PSA level (111.1 vs 32.1 ng/mL, P = 0.05), and a shorter first phase without treatment (7.6 vs 11.2 months, P = 0.05). Overall 5-year metastatic disease free survival of 91.3%. The overall 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 68%. Using multivariate analysis, a Gleason score of >or= 8 (P = 0.021), first-phase duration with no treatment of < 1 year (P = 0.044), positive lymph nodes or metastatic disease at the time of starting IAS (P = 0.023) and age < 70 years (P = 0.037) were the strongest predictors of biochemical progression. CONCLUSION: IAS appeared to be a feasible treatment; the best candidates being those aged> 70 years with localized prostate cancer and a Gleason score of 相似文献   

Treatment of localized prostate cancer using high-intensity focused ultrasound

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the biochemical disease-free survival (DFS), predictors of clinical outcome and morbidity of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), a noninvasive treatment that induces complete coagulative necrosis of a tumour at depth through the intact skin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 63 patients with stage T1c-2bN0M0 localized prostate cancer underwent HIFU using the Sonablate system (Focus Surgery, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA). None of the patients received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the criteria recommended by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition, i.e. three consecutive increases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after the nadir. The median (range) age, PSA level and follow-up were 71 (45-87) years, 8.5 (3.39-57.0) ng/mL and 22.0 (3-63) months, respectively. RESULTS: The overall biochemical disease-free rate was 75% (47 patients). The 3-year biochemical DFS rates for patients with a PSA level before HIFU of <10, 10.01-20 and >20 ng/mL were 82%, 62% and 20% (P < 0.001), respectively. The 3-year biochemical DFS rates for patients with a PSA nadir of <0.2, 0.21-1 and >1 ng/mL were 100%, 74% and 21% (P < 0.001), respectively. Final follow-up sextant biopsies showed that 55 (87%) of the patients were cancer-free. Multivariate analysis showed that the PSA nadir (P < 0.001) was a significant independent predictor of relapse. CONCLUSION: HIFU therapy appears to be a safe, effective and minimally invasive therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer, and the PSA nadir is a useful predictor of clinical outcome.     

Broadening the criteria for avoiding staging bone scans in prostate cancer: a retrospective study of patients at the Royal Marsden Hospital

OBJECTIVE: To determine if it is possible to exclude staging bone scans in a greater proportion of patients if more consideration is given to T stage and Gleason score, as recent guidelines from the National Institute of Clinical Excellence state that routine staging bone scans for prostate cancer are unnecessary in patients with a prostate specific antigen level (PSA) of < 10 ng/mL and Gleason scores of < 8. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of consecutive patients with untreated prostate cancer who had a staging isotope bone scan between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2000, who were not on hormone therapy, who had their PSA estimated within 30 days of the scan, and who had histologically confirmed prostate cancer on biopsy reviewed at the Royal Marsden. Data were analysed according to Gleason score, major Gleason grade, clinical T-stage and PSA level. RESULTS: In all, 420 patients were identified who fulfilled the criteria for inclusion; 67 scans (16%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 13-20%) were positive. Of the 187 scans taken in patients with a PSA level of 相似文献   

Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of radical prostatectomy (RP) in Japan, by retrospectively analysing the clinicopathological data in patients with clinical T1-T2 prostate cancer treated by RP, as there can be prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after RP in substantially many patients, and its character can differ according to ethnic group and/or country. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 1192 patients who had a RP from 1993 to 2002 with no neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy and whose PSA level after RP decreased at least once to undetectable levels (<0.2 ng/mL). PSA recurrence was defined as > or = 0.20 ng/mL. The patient data were collected from the Urological Oncology Study Group, a subgroup of Japan Clinical Oncology Group. RESULTS: The patients' median (range) age was 67 (47-83) years and their PSA level before RP was 8.7 (1.0-153) ng/mL. During the median follow-up of 45.6 months, 302 of the 1192 patients (25.3%) developed PSA recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 369 (61-2128) days after RP. A log-rank test showed that five significant clinicopathological factors were associated with PSA recurrence after RP: the percentage of prostate needle-biopsy cores with cancer, the biopsy Gleason score, PSA level before RP, pathological stage, and the Gleason score of the RP specimen (P < 0.001 for all). In multivariate analyses, the percentage of positive biopsy cores, PSA level before RP, pT and the Gleason score of the RP specimen were all independent significant predictors of PSA recurrence after RP in Japanese men. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of PSA recurrence after RP was 25.3% in Japan and the percentage of positive biopsy cores, PSA level before RP, pT and the Gleason score of the RP specimen were independent significant factors for PSA recurrence.     

Prognostic indicators for long term outcome following radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer involving the seminal vesicles

Seminal vesicle involvement at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer has been equated with metastatic disease. We review our biochemical freedom from disease results following RP in patients with seminal vesicle involvement with particular attention to identifying variables that may be predictive of disease recurrence. We retrospectively reviewed our surgical database and identified patients with pT3b (2002 AJCC) prostate cancer at RP [corrected]. There were 70 cases without lymph node involvement and with available clinical follow-up identified. Any patient receiving androgen deprivation therapy, radiation therapy, or with a sustained PSA elevation greater than 0.2 ng/mL was considered a biochemical failure. Results were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Mean age was 63.4 (range 45.7-79.5) years, mean preoperative PSA was 11.3 ng/mL (range 2-60), mean biopsy Gleason score was 7.2 (range 4-9), mean RP Gleason score was 7.5 (range 5-9), and median follow-up time was 61.5 months (range 2.3-160.6). Overall, 33/70 (47%) patients were without evidence of disease without further therapy. For patients with pT3bN0Mx prostate cancer, margin status, capsular invasion, and PSA were not statistically significant risk factors for disease progression. Gleason score and major Gleason grade were the only statistically significant variables that predicted disease progression. A specimen Gleason score of greater than 7 and major Gleason grades greater than 3 were associated with an increased rate of disease progression in this patient group.     

Efficacy of primary hormonal therapy for patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: A retrospective multicenter study

AIM: A retrospective review of patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer was performed to evaluate the efficacy of primary hormonal therapy and predict long-term prognosis in these patients. METHODS: A total of 628 patients who were diagnosed with stage T1c to T3 prostate cancer were treated with primary hormonal therapy at participating institutions. The patients were classified based on pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, and time to nadir PSA level. Disease-specific and progression-free survival rates were investigated, and compared among the subgroups. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 74.5 years, and median pretreatment PSA level was 14.0 ng/mL. A total of 399 patients (63.5%) were treated with combined androgen blockade (CAB), and 229 patients (36.5%) were treated with castration monotherapy. The disease-specific survival rate of all 628 patients was 89.1% at 8 years. The group that showed a good response to primary hormonal therapy (Group G, pretreatment PSA level < or =20 ng/mL, Gleason score < or =7, and time to nadir PSA < or =6 months) accounted for approximately one-third of the total number of T1c-T3 patients. Disease-specific and progression-free survival rates at 8 years in Group G were 98.9% and 82.0%, respectively. These rates increased to 100% and 87.3%, respectively, in patients receiving CAB treatment in Group G. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate the usefulness of primary hormonal therapy, especially CAB treatment, for patients showing a good response to hormonal therapy in long-term control of localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.     

Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Improves the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Radioactive Seed Implantation for Localized Prostate Cancer

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) has been extensively studied in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and external-beam irradiation for prostate cancer. While there are a few reports in the literature on its use in men undergoing brachytherapy, little information exists about its beneficial effects in such patients. In this report, we describe the effects of NHT on prostate volume (PV) prior to seed implantation and on the prostate specific antigen (PSA) and postimplant biopsy outcomes of patients who presented with high-risk features. Hormone therapy (leuprolide and flutamide 750 mg/day) was given to 145 patients for 3 months prior to and for 3 months after permanent iodine-125 (160 Gy) or palladium-103 (115 Gy) seed implantation. Of these, 28 (19%) received NHT because of a preimplant PV >50 cc, and 117 patients received NHT because they had a PSA >10 ng/mL, Gleason score >/=7, or clinical stage >/=T(2b). All patients underwent implantation using the real-time intraoperative method, and no patients received external-beam irradiation. Of the 145 patients treated, 67 (46%) had a PSA >10 ng/mL (range 1.9-57 ng/mL; mean 12.2 ng/mL), 50 (35%) had Gleason score >/=7, and 80 (55%) had stage >/=T(2b) disease. Prostate volume was measured in 106 patients prior to NHT and 3 months later immediately prior to the seed implant. The mean PV was 50.4 cc (range 17-150 cc), whereas the mean PV after NHT was 31 cc (range 11.7-73.7 cc). The mean PV reduction was 35% (range 2%-62%). Volume reduction was compared in those patients who presented with a PV <40 cc (N = 51) and those with a PV >/=40 cc (N = 56). The mean reduction for the smaller glands was 29% (range 2%-54%) compared with 41% (range 7%-62%) for the larger glands (P < 0.05). Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year (range 1.0-6.4; mean 2.2 years). The 4-year actuarial rate of freedom from PSA failure (PSA >1.0 ng/mL with two consecutive elevations) was 85%. There was no difference in rates of freedom from PSA failure for those with initial Gleason 2-4 (96%), 5-6 (78%), 7 (80%), or 8-9 (83%; P = 0.5). Control rates were 85% for patients with PSA 20 ng/mL (P = 0.8). There was a trend to decreased control rates with higher-stage disease (98% for T(1)-T(2a) v 68% for T(2c)), but these differences were likewise not significant (P = 0.12). The control rates for the 28 low-risk patients with enlarged prostate glands were compared with those of the 117 with high-risk features and were not different (100% v 82%; P = 0.1). There were 62 patients who agreed to eight-core prostate biopsies 2 years after implantation, and 60 (97%) were negative for tumor. This trial shows that NHT can reduce PV an average of 35% prior to seed implantation with the greatest reduction found in patients with larger prostates (41%). Hormonal therapy also appears to improve biochemical (PSA) control and local control (prostate biopsy) in patients with high-risk disease, yielding results similar to those in men with low-risk prostate cancer.