"Instant" new leprosy case-detection: an experience in Bihar State in India

The National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) is based on survey, education and treatment, including coverage of all the registered cases with multi-drug therapy (MDT). The Government of India introduced MDT in all leprosy endemic districts through a vertical set-up, and through mobile leprosy treatment units in low endemic districts. Anti-leprosy work has not been uniform in all the states and needed push-start in some, such as Bihar. There have been spurts of leprosy elimination activities and the entire populations of the regions have not been covered because of various administrative reasons and logistic problems. In Singhbhum district of Bihar, a successful attempt was made to cover the maximum population by campaign approach. The strategy was to involve all the field workers of the leprosy programme in the district, supported by a small group of experienced personnel. The campaign, lasting for 39 working days, resulted in detecting leprosy cases equivalent to 64% of cases detected during the previous one full year. The entire operation helped the local staff to gain experience that would be useful for the future of the NLEP, and also provide an insight into working practices. Similar campaign approach can be used in situations where case-detection activities are feeble and the implementation of MDT is slow. If such campaigns are repeated at appropriate intervals, it will be a great support to achieving the goal of leprosy elimination.     

Pace of leprosy elimination and support teams in Bihar state, India

Despite the extensive implementation of multiple drug therapy (MDT) in most leprosy-endemic countries world-wide since 1982, bringing about a remarkable reduction in prevalence, there are still regions at the sub-national level where the implementation of MDT remains difficult. The state of Bihar (population 86.3 million) in India is a good example of such a region. Previously rated as one of the most highly endemic states, it still contributes about 21% of the total caseload in India and about 12% of the global caseload. For various reasons, case-finding and drug treatment have lagged behind the progress made in most other states in the country and in 1996, the Damien Foundation India Trust (DFIT) volunteered technical support to increase the pace of elimination. Sixteen out of the 39 districts in the state were allocated, with a population of 41.8 million. Support teams, including a Medical Advisor and a Non-Medical Supervisor, both with over 10 years experience of leprosy work and control programmes, were provided to assist and work alongside government staff in case detection, treatment delivery, case-holding and discharge in their respective areas of operation. New case detection by intensive survey increased by 394% and total new case detection by 226% during the year 1996-1997, with similar trends in the following year. Striking improvements were also observed in MDT coverage, treatment regularity, monitoring and discharge of patients and in the training of local staff. This collaboration between a non-government agency (DFIT) and the staff of the National Leprosy Eradication Programme in 16 out of 39 districts in the State of Bihar has clearly been extremely successful. Similar approaches in the remaining districts of Bihar, and in other parts of India, where the infrastructure is available but inadequate, may contribute significantly to achieving the elimination goal at national and sub-national levels.     

Leprosy situation in endemic states of India and prospects of elimination of the disease

In India there is a dramatic fall in the prevalence rate (PR) of leprosy, but the new case-detection rate (NCDR) has not been reduced concomitantly. It is the operational efficiency of the National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) that has led to a significant reduction in the NCDR in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. The ratio of PR to NCDR has been declining in these two states and it reveals that elimination could be reached even with the high NCDR level of 3 to 4 per 10000 population, particularly if single skin lesion (SSL) cases are discharged through single dose treatment of rifampicin, ofloxacin and minocycline (ROM). On the other hand, the significant number of cases detected in Bihar and Orissa during modified leprosy elimination campaigns (MLECs) reveals that there are lacunae in operational activities in new case-detection resulting in a large number of undetected cases in the community. Only one-third of the cases are reporting voluntarily. Awareness of leprosy is not adequate to motivate the patients to report voluntarily and complete their treatment, thus underscoring the need for relying on active case-detection so that transmission can be broken and elimination of leprosy achieved. In addition, the influence of socio-economic factors on continued occurrence of leprosy cannot be ruled out. The establishment of a sentinel surveillance system along with a computerized simplified information system to gain in-depth knowledge on the functioning of the NLEP will ensure operational efficiency. In view of this situation, the NLEP should adopt a more realistic approach towards reaching the elimination goal.     

Epidemiological trends of leprosy elimination in CLTRI rural field operation area, Tamil Nadu, India

The analysis of computerized data of patients in our Rural Field Operation Area (Kunrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu) from the start of MDT in 1986 has shown a decrease of leprosy prevalence from 275/10000 in 1986 to 0.7/10000 in 2005. Leprosy has been eliminated as a public health problem after 19 years of MDT implementation. Although the control programme was started in 1962, MDT implementation began only in 1986. The new case-detection rate has declined significantly from 27.3 in 1987 to 2.4/10000 in 2005 (y = -1.6x + 2325.1, p = < 0.05). The age-specific cumulative detection rates calculated showed highest case-detection at 10-14 years for total, 10-14 years for PB, 50-54 for MB, and 10-14 for both males and females. MB percentage was more among new cases in the last three years as compared to the initial three years, and this difference was found to be statistically significant, but there was no significant difference between the first three and the last three-year periods in child, male and disability rates (grade +/-2) among new cases. Thus, the declining trend in NCDR has not reflected any change in sex and age-groups of new cases. This analysis strengthens the hypothesis of sub-clinical cases possibly transmitting the disease and MB cases accruing after long incubation period.     

Trends in detection of new leprosy cases at two centres in Himachal Pradesh, India: a ten-year study

An impressive decline in leprosy prevalence rate (PR) in all endemic districts of India is seen in the post-MDT era. However, the new case-detection rate, an important statistical indicator in leprosy control programmes, has not shown significant decline in spite of all efforts. In Himachal Pradesh, a decline in PR from 7.8 to 0.56/10000 between 1991 to 2000 is seen, and recently the State has won national acclaim for having achieved the goal of elimination of leprosy in all the districts. The vertical leprosy programme has been integrated into general health services of the state. An analysis of data from 1991 to 2000 of two leprosy control units of Himachal Pradesh, the Urban Leprosy Clinic in Shimla (ULC-S) and the District Leprosy Control Unit in Mandi (DLCU-M), showed no significant decline in the new cases detected. 277 and 271 new cases were detected at these centres respectively; these included 2.2% and 1.5% children of less than 14 years of age. Almost 75% of these cases were males and of MB type. A steadily increasing trend in the annual detection of new cases was seen at both the centres during the decade. The cases registered at DLCU-M were mainly indigenous to the district. At ULC-S, 45 migrant cases from other endemic areas-mainly from Nepal, Bihar, and Uttar Pradesh-had also contributed to the increased number of new cases. Other possible causes discussed for this higher new case detection, e.g. overdiagnosis, detection of backlog "hidden cases" and voluntary reporting of patients, do not differ from those seen in other parts of the country or the world.     

Progress towards elimination of leprosy as a public health problem in India and role of modified leprosy elimination campaign

India (population 943 million) has seen a highly significant decrease in the prevalence of leprosy since the introduction of multi-drug therapy (MDT) in 1981. From a prevalence rate of 57/10,000 of the population in March 1981, the figure has declined to 5.2/10,000 in March 1999. This was possible due to the creation of a completely vertical (specialized) infrastructure for leprosy control in the 218 endemic districts of the country and skeleton vertical staff in the remaining districts, coupled with the recruitment of additional staff on contract basis to provide MDT through vertical staff in endemic districts and mobile treatment units in the moderate and low endemic districts. Despite all efforts, however, new case detection has not shown a decline over the last 14 years due to the presence of hidden (and undiagnosed) cases. Therefore, in order to intensify and hasten progress towards elimination (less than 1 case per 10,000 of the population) in the whole country, it was decided to implement a massive leprosy elimination campaign (LEC) in all the States/Union Territories (UTs). The reports of 22 States/UTs indicate that 415 out of the total of 490 districts in the country were covered by modified LEC (MLEC), with 85% coverage of the population. The campaign used in India was modified from the pattern previously described by the World Health Organization. The detection of hidden or suspected cases took place within a short, intensive period of 6-7 days and relied heavily on house-to-house searches by General Health Care staff trained in leprosy detection and confirmation was made by appropriately trained staff. This MLEC received widespread Government and public support, resulting in the detection of 454,290 hidden cases of leprosy, whilst providing training to a large number of General Health Care staff and volunteers and creating widespread awareness about leprosy and the availability of treatment free of charge for all cases. This programme proved to be one of the most successful health care interventions undertaken in India in recent years, particularly in the states of Bihar and Orissa. Although a few states in India are unlikely to reach the current WHO goal of elimination before end of the year 2000, the results of the MLEC strongly support the possibility that elimination levels will be achieved in the majority of states by the end of the year 2000 and at national level by the end of the year 2002.     

Leprosy control activities in India: integration into general health system

Integration of leprosy control into the general health system is an essential element of a leprosy elimination strategy. In India, the process has been undertaken with the assistance of World Bank in a phased manner. In the first phase (2001-2002), 24 low/moderately endemic provinces for leprosy were targeted. Operational research was undertaken in these low/moderate endemic provinces to assess the progress of integration of leprosy control in general health system using defined categories, viz. structural integration, training status, availability of MDT and recording/reporting of cases. Selection of nine provinces, 18 districts, 86 health facilities and 108 sub-centres was performed using multistage stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected by interviewing GHS/vertical staff, scrutiny of records and spot checking of MDT stock by Health officers of three leprosy institutions of the Government of India. The result showed that district leprosy nuclei had formed in 16 of 18 districts. In 56% of health facilities vertical staff were redeployed for delivering general health care. Forty-five percent of medical officers, 71% of health supervisors and 75% of multipurpose workers were trained in leprosy. MDT treatment was available in >80% of health facilities. In only 2% of health facilities 3 months MDT stock of all types was present. Forty-four percent of sub-centres were delivering subsequent doses (second dose onward) of MDT. Reporting through a simplified information system was universal. This study emphasizes the need for reorientation training of Medical Officers, better MDT stock management and decentralized management of cases up to sub-centre level.     

An interventional strategy to strengthen integration of NLEP into primary health care

The Government of Orissa implemented the Revised Operational Strategy in September 1999 to integrate the NLEP functions into primary health care activities. An interventional strategy, in the form of consensus on job responsibilities and capacity-building through training of PHC staff, was developed and adopted in a rural block under the Department of Community Medicine to strengthen the integration process. The impact was studied six months after the intervention by comparing it with the leprosy situation in the pre-intervention period. Data were collected by verification of registers at the block PHC and sub-centre levels. Analysis was done using different leprosy indices, such as new case-detection rate (NCDR), child rate, deformity rate, profile of leprosy cases and patient compliance, etc. This integrated approach was found to be more community-oriented and effective in early case-detection in children and women. It also helped in providing continuous MDT services because of the involvement of primary health care functionaries in the post-intervention period.     

Epidemiological shift in leprosy in a rural district of central India following introduction of multi-drug therapy (April 1986 to March 1992 and April 1992 to March 2002)

This study compares the epidemiological pattern of leprosy in pre- (April 1986 to March 1992) and post- (April 1992 to March 2002) multi-drug therapy (MDT) periods by retrospective analysis of 3274 registered leprosy cases in the rural field area of Regional Leprosy Training & Research Institute (RLTRI), situated in Raipur district of Chattisgarh province of Central India. The area has high endemicity for leprosy. In the post-MDT period, prevalence rate (PR) came down to less than 1 in 10, while New Case Detection Rate (NCDR) remained almost static during the two periods. Of the total new registered cases, 30.1% were registered during the pre-MDT period and the remaining 69.9% during the post-MDT period. Comparison of key leprosy variables among new registered cases showed a 2-fold rise in the proportion of MB cases (14.8 versus 27.6%), 3.0% increase in proportion of child cases (15.3 versus 18.6%) and cases with deformity grade II (3.1 versus 5.9%) and 4.0% increase in female proportion (41.4 versus 45.7%) during the post-MDT period. A decline was noted in mean age of registration for both MB (6.4 years) and PB (5.7 years) groups in the post-MDT period. While comparing treatment and outcome related variables, a marked fall of 25.8 months was recorded in treatment duration in the post-MDT period. The defaulter rate came down by 45.0% and relapse rate by more than 12.0% during the same period. The study shows that MDT is effective operationally, but continued ongoing transmission of infection and delayed diagnosis needs corrective action.     

New case-detection trends in a multi-drug therapy programme: definite reduction in sight

MDT has made a visible impact on leprosy in Andhra Pradesh as reflected by reduction of prevalence as well as in new case-detection, which is used as a proxy for incidence of the disease. Such reductions have also been seen in West Godavari district and the Damien Leprosy Centre at Vegavaram (an NGO project), where MDT is being implemented since 1988.     

Trends in leprosy over fifty years in Gudiyatham Taluk, Vellore, Tamil Nadu

This paper presents epidemiological trends over a fifty-year period observed in a defined population served by the Schieffelin Leprosy Research and Training Centre (SLR & TC), Karigiri, Vellore District in Tamil Nadu. It covers three distinct periods, namely, the pre-MDT era with dapsone monotherapy, the MDT era under a vertical leprosy control programme and the MDT era after leprosy control services were integrated into the general health services. Prevalence rates have declined steadily from 125 per 10,000 population at the time of introduction of MDT in 1982 to 5 per 10,000 at the time of integration in 1997 to less than 1 per 10,000 in 2005. The new case-detection rate was 5.4 per 10,000 when the field programme started in 1962, and held steady at 15-20 per 10,000 between 1970 and 1980. It then showed a gradual fall from 10.8 per 10,000 in 1985 to 3.9 at the time of integration, and continued to fall in the post-integration period and was 0.8 per 10,000 in 2005. The mean age at detection showed a gradual increase from 23.4 years in the dapsone era to 31.2 years in the post-integration period. The male: female ratio showed a preponderance of males almost throughout the reference period. While polar types of leprosy (TT & LL) were common in the dapsone era, more of borderline leprosy (BT & BL) cases was seen more recently. MB rates that were high initially, declined steadily during monotherapy and stabilized between 10% and 12% during the vertical MDT programme and is showing an increase in the post-integration-period. The proportion of cases with Grade 2 disability at registration showed a gradual decline during the monotherapy period, remained relatively unchanged at 8%-10% during the the MDT period, and showed a sharp rise in the immediate post-integration period before falling. Analysis of trends of leprosy in a well-defined geographical population over a fifty-year period gives useful information on how the disease has evolved over the years. It provides opportunities to explore the reasons for the changes observed, though one has to be cautious while interpreting such data due to changes in definition, the play of operational factors, and changes in policies and strategies.     

Case detection, gender and disability in leprosy in Bangladesh: a trend analysis.

A trend analysis is presented of all newly detected leprosy cases over an 18-year period (1979-1996) in a highly leprosy endemic area of Bangladesh. A total of 23,678 new cases were registered, with an average of 860 new cases per year in the first 12 years, and increasing to around 3000 in 1996. The male:female (M:F) ratio decreased from 2.3 to 1.4. The proportions of newly detected cases with MB leprosy and of newly detected cases with any disability decreased over time. These reductions were more marked in the higher age groups of both sexes. The reduction in disability was primarily attributable to a decline in grade 2 disability. New case detection rates (NCDR) of all leprosy patients per 10,000 general population increased for males from 3 to 6; and for females from 1 to 4, while the NCDR of MB leprosy decreased in males from 1.4 to 0.6, and in females fluctuated around 0.45. The NCDRs of leprosy patients with disabilities showed an initial decrease in the first period, especially in males, but later showed an increase. The NCDR of males with disability was about twice as high as that of females. Finally, female NCDRs in the ages between 15 and 30 were low by comparison with the male NCDRs at the same time. This may be due to the sociocultural characteristics of the Bangladeshi society, with gender differences in exposure, health seeking behaviour and opportunities for case detection. Operational changes in the control programme have contributed to the changed profile of newly detected cases. This study shows that the application of general population statistics is essential for understanding the dynamics in leprosy control programmes under changing operational conditions. Combining case detection figures with such statistics helps to identify population groups that are possibly not benefiting sufficiently from the services provided, and to clarify the dynamics in control programmes and the future trends and programme requirements.     

A review of trends in new case-detection in Subarnapur district of Orissa

Trends in new case-detection are analysed by reviewing the demographic and leprosy epidemiological data and current indicators in Subarnapur district, Orissa State and India. Population-specific new case-detection rates were calculated for analysis. The trend of skin-smear positive cases over a period of 10 years was reviewed in respect of smear positive cases of 1991. During the years 2002 to 2004, a sudden fall was noticed in the new cases detected in both India and Orissa state, whereas the decline in Subarnapur district was more gradual. The fall in the female-specific new case-detection rates is found to be rapid from 11 to 2.5 over the last three years. This also indirectly indicated the health-seeking behaviour of women in accessing health services and hence required a changed strategy. A similar rapid decline was observed in child-specific new case-detection rates. On analysiS, the decline of highly bacilliferous cases from 1991 to 2001 was found to be statistically significant. The analysis also brought out the fact that cases with bacterial index of 1+, 2+ and 3+, though small in numbers, were detected during the last three years indicating continued presence of cases with low bacterial density in the community. The review indicates a definite decline in the occurrence of new cases in all groups. Caution needs to be exercised about continued presence of cases with low bacterial index though in small numbers. The rapid decrease of cases in all groups during the years 2004 and 2005 warrants meticulous surveillance. The surveillance activities could include monitoring of population-specific new case-detection rates and skin-smear positive cases at district and state levels in order to advise on leprosy eradication programme strategies.     

Integration of leprosy control into general health care system: observations from a state with low endemicity

The study was undertaken as part of operational research to assess the level of integration of leprosy services into general health care system in 24 low or moderately endemic states/union territories by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Himachal Pradesh was one of the nine randomly selected states for the study. Out of the 12 districts in the State, 2 were selected randomly for the study. In each of the selected districts, 8 health facilities (that included a district hospital, an urban hospital/urban health centre, an Employees' State Insurance Hospital, a community health centre and a primary health centre) and 9 sub-centres were surveyed. Selection was done randomly at each stage. Data were collected on training in leprosy of general health care staff, availability of drugs for MDT in the system and maintenance of leprosy records by the staff of the system. The study showed mixed results. About half (53.2%) of the existing medical officers, 83.9% of health supervisors and 96.8% of multi-purpose workers were trained in leprosy. But only 31.3% of medical officers were able to diagnose leprosy and most of them were relying on vertical staff and skin specialists for confirmation. MDT services were provided by 20% of rural and 66.7% of urban health facilities that were acting as treatment centres. None of the health facilities had 3 months' stock of all types of blister packs, as per the guidelines of the Government of India. None of the sub-centres was involved in MDT delivery. However, reporting as per SIS formats was universal. The study emphasized the need for training and better management of MDT drug stock.     

Integration of leprosy into GHS in India: a follow up study (2006-2007)

In India leprosy services, were integrated into the General Health Services (GHS), in a phased manner, in different provinces, from 2001 to 2004. This study reports the findings from a follow-up operational research undertaken in 2006-2007, to assess the level of integration, on predetermined indicators related to: referral services, training of health functionaries, availability of diagnosis, treatment, MDT dispersal and counselling guidelines in health facilities, recording and reporting by GHS staff, MDT stock management and involvement of health sub-centres in different Indian provinces. Nine provinces, 18 districts, 88 health facilities and 108 sub-centres were selected, by using multistage stratified random sampling techniques. Reverse integration, as reflected by the training and deployment of vertical staff in GHS, was also assessed. Data was collected by medical officers experienced in leprosy, with the assistance of state health functionaries, and recorded on separate schedules for health facility and sub-centre levels. The study also touched on the issue of client perception towards MDT services by interviewing 149 under treatment/cured leprosy cases (who had completed treatment within the last year), in the community with the help of local interpreters. Results showed wide variations across the selected provinces in various parameters. District leprosy nuclei were understaffed in 12(66.7%) districts, and district hospitals were not working as referral institutions anywhere. The training status of medical officers and multi-purpose workers in leprosy was low in Andhra Pradesh (6.9 and 22.4%), Madhya Pradesh (26.3 and 14.5%), Rajasthan (19.7 and 40.9%) and Kerala (25.5 and 65.7%). MDT stock availability as per the National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) guidelines was not adequate in all provinces. Availability of patient counseling guidelines was nil/low in Kerala, Karnataka, West Bengal, Orissa, Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh. The involvement of sub-centres, in case referral, recording and dispensing MDT was nil Kerala and Rajasthan and poor in Andhra Pradesh. Ninety percent of clients in Kerala and 38.0% in Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh did not get MDT in the nearest health facilities or sub-centres.     

Role of target groups in integrated leprosy programmes

The introduction of integrated leprosy services into the primary health care set-up has taken away active case-detection in the community and is replaced by passive reporting by the suspected, afflicted individuals. This can only be made operative effectively with intensive IEC activities in the community. A research study involving school-children (219,000) in leprosy work achieved spectacular success in new case-detection, effective monitoring, completion of MDT and coverage of a large number of individuals (750,000). The results evaluated on a representative sample of 20,000 school students (pre- and post-test), showed over 90% success in creating awareness about the cause of the disease, its symptoms, curability by fixed duration MDT and better attitudes and perceptions of the community towards leprosy-affected individuals. It is emphasised that, in view of the experience gained from the study, other more cohesive and disciplined target groups, such as scouts and guides, NCC cadets, NSS volunteers, should be identified for leprosy work throughout the country in a planned and coordinated manner in order to implement and sustain leprosy eradication activities in the near-elimination and post-elimination phases.     

Study on integration of the National Leprosy Eradication Programme into primary health care services: a pilot project

The Central Leprosy Training and Research Institute, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, undertook an interventional study, as a pilot project, on integration of the National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) vertical activities into the PHC system in two selected districts of Visakhapatnam and Krishna of Andhra Pradesh, between September 1997 and March 1999. The objective of the study was to assess the various operational aspects and implications of integrated implementation of the activities of the NLEP through the PHC system. 1,304,163 people (239,142 in the study group and 1,065,020 in the control group) were enrolled in the study. The methodology employed in carrying out the pilot project in the two selected districts is described. MDT was in operation for more than 5 years in these two districts through vertical approach. Prevalence has declined from >50/10000 at the start of MDT to about 3/10000 at the start of the project. During the implementation phase, 1459 new leprosy cases were detected (NCDR 5.39/10000 person-years) and 1458 cases were released from treatment (RFT rate: 93.04%) and towards the end of the project 450 cases were under treatment (PR 1.66/10000). Simple rates, ratios and proportions were used in the analysis of data and results were compared. The interventional study was designed to assess the implications and impact of implementation of NLEP activities through PHC staff. The study design, rationale, data collection, data processing, quality control methods employed in the study project and the results are discussed. The results of the study indicate that integrated implementation of the NLEP by PHC staff is feasible, if proper support is provided.     

Evaluation of national leprosy eradication programme in Satara District, Maharashtra

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of national leprosy eradication programme (NLEP) in Satara District. A retrospective record based study was conducted in the district leprosy control unit with evaluation indicators like prevalence rate (PR), new case detection rate (NCDR), percentage of cases released from treatment, proportion of female cases among new cases, proportion of multi bacillary (MB) cases among new cases, proportion of grade-2 disability among new cases and proportion of child cases among new cases and trend was analyzed for statistical significance by using Chi-square test. During study period from year March 2003-04 to March 2007-08, there was decrease in PR of leprosy from 2.46/10000 population to 0.62/10000 population, NCDR decreased from 3.46/10000 population to 0.77/10000 population and trend was statistically significant (p<0.001*, P<0.001*) respectively. Declining trend of grade 2 disability among new cases was noted and this was statistically significant (p<0.01*). Proportion of female cases among new cases showed little fluctuation from 43.3% to 47.5% but trend was statistically significant (p<0.03*). Proportion of MB cases among new cases increased from 44.4% to 53.6% while proportion of child cases among new cases decreased from 16.5% to 12% and trend was statistically significant (p <0.001*, p<0.001*) respectively. The NLEP has a favorable impact towards elimination of leprosy in Satara District, Maharashtra.     

Integrating leprosy control into general health service in a war situation: the level after 5 years in eastern Congo

South Kivu Province of the Democratic Republic of Congo, plagued by a turbulent civil war, started a process of integrating leprosy into general health services in 1995. A questionnaire survey was carried out in September 2000 to assess the level of structural and functional integration, after 5 years of the integration process, in nine of its 14 health districts. The survey revealed that a total of 76 clinic nurses remained of those trained in leprosy since 1993. In all, 33-6% of the total 226 health facilities had a trained nurse, but according to the district supervisors who filled the questionnaires, nurses in only 28.3% of health facilities could diagnose leprosy. Less than 40% of the total 226 health facilities were structurally integrated with MDT and other leprosy services. Functionally, the clinic nurses were involved in dispensing MDT drugs and keeping leprosy records in 90.8 and 81.6%, respectively, of the integrated facilities, and diagnostic activities in 43.7%. The degree of involvement put health facilities into four grades of functional integration: 1) fully-functional integrated, 2) semi-functional integrated, 3) semi-integrated (structural but not functional), 4) not integrated (vertical). On this scale, 80% of 107 health facilities reported by the supervisors had some form of integration and 20% were not integrated. Treatment activities were significantly more functionally integrated than the diagnostic and POD activities, which require more skills. The presence of a trained nurse in a health facility made no significant difference to the involvement of clinic nurses in dispensing MDT drugs and performing POD activities, but significantly affected their performance of diagnostic activities and records keeping. The endemic districts had higher levels of structural integration, were not more likely to be functionally integrated. The levels of structural integration after 5 years are considered low in South Kivu Province, and reflect the significant negative effect of civil conflicts on integration of leprosy programmes in Africa.     

Leprosy elimination campaigns in Orissa

Four Modified Leprosy Elimination Campaigns (MLECs) were conducted in Orissa by March 2003. Their impact on various leprosy indicators was analyzed. More than 70% of the people of the State were examined during these campaigns. The suspect rate decreased from 1.44% to 0.37% towards the fourth MLEC. About 15% of the suspects were clinically confirmed to be having leprosy. The total number of new cases detected during the MLEC years was on the decrease. A marked fall in new case-detection rate was observed during inter-MLEC years. This has resulted in fluctuation in the prevalence rate during the MLEC years, but the overall PR/10,000 population decreased from 12.18 in 1996-97 to 7.3 in March 2003. More than 40% of the total new cases and about 45% of total new child cases for the corresponding year were detected during the MLECs, and the proportion of total new case-detection was as high as 60.8% during the first MLEC. The proportion of female cases detected during succeeding MLECs improved and an almost equal number of female cases were detected during MLECs III and IV. Considering the present leprosy situation in Orissa and the effectiveness of MLECs in case-detection, it was recommended that such campaigns should be undertaken in select high prevalent blocks of the State at regular intervals, along with the strengthening of the integration of NLEP activities into primary health care activities.