Reduction in spasm with a long hydrophylic transradial sheath

Objectives: We aimed to assess the efficiency of a long hydrophilic sheath in reducing radial spasm for transradial approach. Background: Despite a lower access site complication rate, cardiac catheterization using transradial approach is not widely used. Radial spasm is one of the main issues for transradial angiography and percutaneous interventions. We assumed that radial artery protection using a long hydrophilic‐coated sheath would reduce radial spasm compared to a bare short sheath. Methods: Three hundred and fifty one patients (pts) admitted for transradial coronary angiography ± percutaneous coronary interventions were randomly assigned to a long hydrophilic‐coated or a short sheath (control group). Primary end point was the occurrence of a radial spasm defined by significant patient pain evaluated by scale score (>4) or significant catheter frictions during manipulation. Procedure failure, radial occlusion, and local complications were also assessed. Results: Radial spasm was significantly reduced when using the long‐coated compared to the short sheath in 7 (4%) vs. 32 pts (18%) P < 0.001. No difference was found regarding procedure failure respectively 1.2% vs. 0.6%, local complication 0.6% vs. 1.2%, and radial occlusion 3.5% vs. 3.5%. Conclusion: Radial artery protection using the long hydrophilic‐coated sheath was efficient in the prevention of radial spasm for transradial approach. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Radial artery spasm in transradial cardiac catheterization. Assessment of factors related to its occurrence, and of its consequences during follow-up

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Radial artery spasm is the most frequent complication of transradial cardiac catheterization. It causes patient discomfort and reduces the procedure's success rate. The aims of this study were to identify variables associated with this complication, such as clinical parameters, angiographic characteristics of the radial artery and factors related to the procedure, and to analyze the clinical consequences of spasm, both generally and for radial artery patency, during follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The study included 637 patients who were undergoing transradial cardiac catheterization. Radial artery spasm was recorded using a scale that reflected the presence of pain and the technical difficulty of the procedure. RESULTS: Radial artery spasm was reported in 127 patients (20.2%). Multivariate analysis showed that the variables associated with radial artery spasm were radial artery anatomical anomalies (odds ratio [OR]=5.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.1-11.4), use of >size-3 catheters (OR=3.0; 95% CI: 1.9-4.7), moderate-to-severe pain during radial artery cannulation (OR=2.6; 95% CI: 1.4-4.9), the use of phentolamine as a spasmolytic (OR=1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-2.9), and postvasodilation radial artery diameter (OR=0.98; 95% CI: 0.98-0.99). At follow-up [20 (18) days], severe pain in the forearm was more frequent in patients who presented with radial artery spasm (12.4% vs 5.3%), but there was no significant difference in the radial artery occlusion rate (4.5% vs 2.2%). CONCLUSION: Radial artery spasm during transradial catheterization mainly depends on radial artery characteristics and procedural variables. At follow-up, radial artery spasm was associated with more frequent severe pain in the forearm, but the radial artery occlusion rate was not increased.     

Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the possible relationship between compression after transradial catheterization and radial artery occlusion. Background: Radial artery occlusion is an important concern of transradial catheterization. Interruption of radial artery flow during compression might influence the rate of radial artery occlusion at follow-up. METHODS: A prospective study including 275 consecutive patients undergoing transradial catheterization was conducted. Arterial sheaths were removed immediately after procedures and conventional compressive dressings were left in place for 2 hr. The pulse oximeter signal in the index finger during ipsilateral ulnar compression was used for the assessment of radial artery flow. RESULTS: Radial artery flow was absent in 174 cases (62%) immediately after entry-site compression. After 2 hr of conventional hemostasis, radial artery flow was absent in 162 cases (58%) before bandage removal. At 7-day follow-up, 12 patients (4.4%) had absent pulsations and radial artery flow was absent in 29 cases (10.5%). Patients with an occluded radial artery at follow-up had significantly smaller arterial diameters at baseline (2.23+/-0.4 mm vs. 2.40+/-0.5 mm; P=0.032) and more frequently had absent flow during hemostasis (90% vs. 54%, P<0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that absent flow before compressive bandages removal was the only independent predictor of radial artery occlusion at follow-up (OR=6.7; IC 95%: 1.95-22.9; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Flow-limiting compression is a frequent finding during conventional hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Absence of radial artery flow during compression represents a strong predictor of radial artery occlusion.     

Is Radial Access and Transradial Cardiac Catheterization Feasible without the Use of Any Vasodilator?

This is a “proof of concept” study to assess feasibility of transradial access without use of vasodilators. Radial artery spasm (RAS) is an important cause of patient discomfort and procedural failure with use of radial access. Vasodilators are routinely used to prevent RAS. However, the use of vasodilators may not be appropriate in substantial groups of patients. These include patients with myocardial infarction and low blood pressure who will benefit from radial access the most. No specific recommendations about use of vasodilators in these settings are stated on consensus documents on radial access. During a short period of shortage of verapamil in our country, 15 consecutive patients underwent cardiac catheterization by transradial route without the use of vasodilators. Procedural success, and pain perceived by the patients along with radial occlusion after the procedure were assessed. In 14 of the 15 patients, the procedure was completed successfully without the use of vasodilators. In one patient, RAS developed and the procedure could be completed after injection of verapamil. Mean pain score was 5.3 on a scale of 0 to 10. No radial occlusion was detected early after the procedure. In three of the patients, a reason that would otherwise preclude use of a vasodilator was identified. Radial access can safely and effectively be performed without the use of vasodilators. Consideration of this approach when use of vasodilators is not appropriate should be formally discussed by the interventional cardiology community.     

Radial artery flow‐mediated dilation predicts arterial spasm during transradial coronary interventions

Background : Transradial coronary catheterization has emerged over the last years as a favorable catheterization practice, based on evidence that it is associated with less vascular complications and shorter hospital stays. However, access site crossover appears to be more frequent when the initial route is the transradial one, one of the main reasons being arterial spasm. We hypothesized that radial flow‐mediated dilation (FMD) measurements could be used as a preprocedural method to assess the likelihood of arterial spasm. Methods : The study population consisted of patients scheduled for transradial diagnostic catheterization in whom ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed. FMD was measured 1–2 days before PCI. The primary endpoint of the study was operator‐defined (operators were blinded as to the FMD results) radial artery spasm. Results : A total of 172 patients (110 male, age 65.3 ± 9) were included. Radial artery spasm was recorded in 13 patients (7.6%). FMD showed a very significant univariate association with the occurrence of spasm (P < 0.001) and was the most important predictor of spasm in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (beta ?3.15; P < 0.001), followed by baseline radial artery diameter (P = 0.04), the number of catheters used (P = 0.049) and the administered volume of contrast medium (P = 0.017). Conclusion : Preprocedural FMD is a significant predictor of arterial spasm before elective transradial PCI. It is a low cost, safe, and feasible noninvasive modality, whose results might be taken into account when deciding on the vascular access route for an elective procedure, the size of sheaths or catheters to be used or the intensity of antispasm medication.© 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A simple and effective regimen for prevention of radial artery spasm during coronary catheterization

Radial artery spasm occurs frequently during the transradial approach for coronary catheterization. Premedications with nitroglycerin and verapamil have been documented to be effective in preventing radial spasms. Verapamil is relatively contraindicated for some patients with left ventricular dysfunction, hypotension and bradycardia. We would like to know whether nitroglycerin alone is sufficient for the prevention of radial artery spasm. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the spasmolytic effect between heparin alone, heparin plus nitroglycerin and heparin plus nitroglycerin and varapamil during transradial cardiac catheterization. In this study, a total of 406 patients underwent transradial cardiac catheterization and intervention. After successful cannulation and sheath insertion of radial arteries, 133 patients in group A received 3,000 units of heparin, 100 microg of nitroglycerin and 1.25 mg of verapamil via sheath, 135 patients in group B received 3,000 units of heparin and 100 microg of nitroglycerin, and 93 patients in group C received 3,000 units of heparin. Five patients in group A (3.8%), 6 patients in group B (4.4%) and 19 patients in group C (20.4%) showed radial spasms. There is no statistically significant difference between groups A and B (p = 0.804), but there are strong statistically significant differences between groups A and C (p = 0.001) and groups B and C (p = 0.003). Intra-arterial premedication with 100 microg nitroglycerin and 3,000 units of heparin is effective in preventing radial spasms during transradial cardiac catheterization.     

Prevention of radial artery occlusion—Patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): A randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of hemostasis with patency in avoiding radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Background: Radial artery occlusion is an infrequent but discouraging complication of transradial access. It is related to factors such as sheath to artery ratio and is less common in patients receiving heparin. Despite being clinically silent in most cases, it limits future transradial access. Patients and Methods: Four hundred thirty‐six consecutive patients undergoing transradial catheterization were prospectively enrolled in the study. Two hundred nineteen patients were randomized to group I, and underwent conventional pressure application for hemostasis. Two hundred seventeen patients were randomized to group II and underwent pressure application confirming radial artery patency using Barbeau's test. Radial artery patency was studied at 24 hr and 30 days using Barbeau's test. Results: Thirty‐eight patients had evidence of radial artery occlusion at 24 hr. Twenty patients had persistent evidence of radial artery occlusion at 1 month. Group II, with documented patency during hemostatic compression, had a statistically and clinically lower incidence of radial artery occlusion (59% decrease at 24 hr and 75% decrease at 30 days, P < 0.05), compared with patients in group I. Low body weight patients were at significantly higher risk of radial artery occlusion. No procedural variables were found to be associated with radial artery occlusion. Conclusion: Patent hemostasis is highly effective in reducing radial artery occlusion after radial access and guided compression should be performed to maintain radial artery patency at the time of hemostasis, to prevent future radial artery occlusion. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Anesthetic ointment only (lidocaine/prilocaine) instead of injectable local lidocaine in trans‐radial catheterization: A viable no‐needle alternative

Objective

The aim of the present study was to assess the level of access site pain in patients undergoing transradial coronary catheterization by using topical application of an anesthetic ointment (lidocaine/prilocaine—AO) compared to standard local anesthesia (LA) by means of injectable lidocaine.

Methods

We prospectively studied 444 patients undergoing elective trans‐radial coronary angiography. The quality of analgesia was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) immediately after the puncture and 30 min after the removal of the sheath. The number and duration of attempts before successful sheath insertion, as well as artery spasm, were compared between the two groups.

Results

Pain levels measured by VAS were found to be similar between the two groups during sheath insertion (VAS: AO: 4.84 ± 1.0 vs 4.82 ± 1.2, P = NS), as well as 30 min after sheath removal (VAS: AO: 0.07 ± 0.5 vs LA: 0.15 ± 0.6, P = NS). The time to obtain radial access was also not affected by the use of anesthetic ointment (AO: 62.24 ± 25.7 s vs LA: 64.04 ± 18.78 sec, P = NS). The rate of clinical or angiographic radial artery spasm was similar (8‐10%) between the groups (P = NS)

Conclusion

Use of a local anesthetic ointment, versus injectable lidocaine, in trans‐radial cardiac catheterization as means of local anesthesia, was found to be equally effective in terms of pain, artery spasm, or artery cannulation speed.

     

Transradial cardiac catheterization: A Review of Access Site Complications

Transradial catheterization (TRC) has been associated with a lower incidence of major access site related complications as compared to the transfemoral approach. With the increased adoption of transradial access, it is essential to understand the potential major and minor complications of TRC. The most common complication is asymptomatic radial artery occlusion, which rarely leads to clinical events, owing to the dual collateral perfusion of the hand. Adequate anticoagulation, appropriate compression techniques, and smaller sheath size can minimize the risk of radial artery occlusion. Hand ischemia with necrosis has never been reported during TRC with thorough pre‐examination of intact collateral circulation. Radial artery spasm is relatively common, and can result in access and procedural failure. It can be prevented by the use of vasodilator cocktails and hydrophilic sheaths. Radial artery perforation can lead to severe forearm hematoma and compartment syndrome if not managed promptly. Careful observation, prompt detection of the hematoma, and management with a pressure bandage dressing are critical to avoid serious complications. Pseudoaneurym and arteriovenous fistula are rare complications, which can likely be managed conservatively without surgical intervention. Nerve injury occurring during access has been reported. Close observation for improvement is necessary, although symptoms usually improve over time. In summary, to prevent access site complications, avoidance of multiple punctures, gentle catheter manipulation, use of guided compression, coupled with careful observation for adverse warning signs such as hematoma, loss of pulse, pain, are critical for safe and effective TRC. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

经桡动脉介入时桡动脉痉挛的危险因素研究

目的观察经桡动脉介入时,引起桡动脉痉挛的危险因素及临床预后,尤其是与桡动脉闭塞的关系。方法选择择期行经桡动脉冠状动脉造影或介入治疗的患者1427例。术前行双侧桡动脉超声检查。术后1个月随访患者预后情况。根据患者是否发生桡动脉痉挛分为桡动脉痉挛组(112例)和非桡动脉痉挛组(1315例),比较2组术前、术中和术后的差异。结果 112例(7.8%)患者发生桡动脉痉挛。logistic回归分析显示,桡动脉痉挛的独立预测因素为女性、桡动脉直径、糖尿病、反复穿刺和桡动脉变异。术后1个月有1361例患者完成了随访(失访率4.6%),较多桡动脉痉挛患者存在持续前臂中重度疼痛(16.1% vs 6.8%,P=0.001)。结论桡动脉痉挛主要是由桡动脉细小、变异和术中反复穿刺导致。桡动脉痉挛常合并持续前臂疼痛,但并不增加桡动脉闭塞发生率。     

维拉帕米在经桡动脉心脏介入治疗中的应用及安全性

目的探讨维拉帕米在经桡动脉心脏介入治疗中的应用及安全性。方法60例经桡动脉心脏介入治疗的患者，从桡动脉局部注入维拉帕米5mg，观察注入前、后心率、血压、局部和全身的变化及术中是否出现桡动脉痉挛。结果60例患者注药前后心率、收缩压、舒张压均有一定程度变化，但无显著性差异，术中未出现桡动脉痉挛，无心衰和新的房室传导阻滞出现。结论在经桡动脉心脏介入治疗时，局部注入维拉帕米5mg，可预防桡动脉痉挛，且无明显副作用，安全有效。     

Brewing the right cocktail for radial intervention

Radial access angioplasty has increased in popularity worldwide due to its decrease of access site complications, early patient mobility, patient comfort and lower costs. In a minority of patients, radial artery occlusion and radial artery spasm occurs. Because of the dual blood supply to the hand, radial artery occlusion is not associated with major clinical sequelae but prevention is important. Radial artery spasm rarely leads to serious vascular complications but can cause patient discomfort and can result in prolonging or failure of the procedure. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies have been evaluated to prevent radial artery occlusion and radial artery spasm. A number of pharmacological 'cocktails' have been successfully tested but there is currently no agreement on the optimal combination of agents. In order to evaluate the best strategy to prevent radial artery occlusion and radial artery spasm we reviewed the relevant studies to date. From these studies it is clear that a 'cocktail' of agents should be given before transradial coronary angiography or angioplasty. A combination of heparin, nitroglycerin and verapamil is associated with the best preventive outcome.     

Prevention of arterial spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions through radial artery: the SPASM study.

AIMS: Radial artery spasm remains the major limitation of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of vasodilators in the prevention of radial artery spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: 1,219 patients were consecutively randomized to receive placebo (n = 198), molsidomine 1 mg (n = 203), verapamil 2.5 mg (n = 409), 5 mg (n = 203) or verapamil 2.5 mg and molsidomine 1 mg (n = 206). All drugs were administered through the arterial sheath. The primary end point was the occurrence of a radial artery spasm defined by the operator as severe limitation of the catheter movement, with or without angiographic confirmation. Main characteristics including age, sex, wrist and arterial sheath diameters and procedure duration were identical across the groups. The rate of radial artery spasm was lowest in patients receiving verapamil and molsidomine (4.9%), compared to verapamil 2.5 mg or 5 mg (8.3 and 7.9%), or molsidomine 1 mg (13.3%); and placebo (22.2%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Radial artery spasm during transradial percutaneous interventions was effectively prevented by the administration of vasodilators. The combination of verapamil 2.5 mg and molsidomine 1 mg provided the strongest relative risk reduction of spasm compared to placebo and should therefore be recommended during percutaneous coronary interventions through the radial approach.     

Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization

Background : Anticoagulant therapy is required to prevent radial artery occlusion (RAO) after transradial catheterization. There is no data comparing bivalirudin to standard heparin. Methods : We studied 400 consecutive patients. In case of diagnostic angiography‐only (n = 200), they received an intravenous bolus of heparin (70 U kg^?1) immediately before sheath removal whereas in case of angiography followed by ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 200), they received bivalirudin (bolus 0.75 mg kg^?1, followed by infusion at 1.75 mg/kg/h). RAO was assessed 4–8 weeks later using two‐dimensional echography‐doppler and reverse Allen's test with pulse oximetry. Results : At follow‐up, 21 of the 400 (5.3%) patients were found to have RAO with no significant difference between the two groups (3.5% bivalirudin vs. 7.0% heparin, P = 0.18). Patients with RAO had a significantly lower weight compared to patients without RAO (78 ± 13 kg vs. 86 ± 18 kg, P = 0.011). By multivariate analysis, a weight <84 kg (OR: 2.78, 95% CI 1.08–8.00, P = 0.032) and a procedure duration ≤20 min (OR: 7.52, 95% CI 1.57–36.0, P = 0.011) remained strong independent predictors of RAO. All cases of radial occlusion were asymptomatic and without clinical sequelae. Conclusion : Delayed administration of bivalirudin or heparin for transradial catheterization provides similar efficacy in preventing RAO. Because of its low cost, a single bolus of heparin can be preferred in case of diagnostic angiography whereas bivalirudin can be contemplated in case of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Radial artery occlusion and hand strength after percutaneous coronary procedures: Results of the HANGAR study

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate muscle force of the hand, thumb, and forefinger in patients with prolonged radial occlusion after transradial percutaneous coronary procedures. Background: There are no data on hand strength and function in patients with prolonged radial occlusion after percutaneous coronary procedures. Methods: Elective patients with chronic stable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures were evaluated the day before the procedure for radial artery patency, Allen test, hand grip, and thumb and forefinger pinch tests. The same measures were performed the day after the procedure and at follow‐up. At follow‐up, patients were divided in two groups according to the radial patency (group 1) or occlusion (group 2). Results: Of the 99 patients included in the study, 90 patients had a patent radial artery (group 1), and nine (9.1%) patients had an occluded artery (group 2). At baseline, there were no significant differences in hand grip test between the two groups (42 ± 11 kg in group 1 and 41 ± 17 kg in group 2, P = 0.74). In both groups, after the procedure, the hand grip test values was significantly reduced compared with baseline values (40 ± 11 kg in group 1, P < 0.0001 and 37 ± 17 kg in group 2, P = 0.007). Finally, at follow‐up, in both groups, the hand grip test values returned to baseline values. Thumb and forefinger pinch tests did not show significant differences after the procedure and at follow‐up, compared with baseline. Conclusions: Radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary procedures was not associated with a reduction in hand and finger strength. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A randomized comparison of TR band and radistop hemostatic compression devices after transradial coronary intervention

Background : The transradial route for coronary intervention has proven to be safe, effective, and widely applicable in different clinical situations. Several compressive hemostatic devices have been introduced that have shown to be safe and are effective in achieving hemostasis. Methods : Seven hundred ninety patients were randomly assigned to receive either TR band or Radistop hemostatic compression devices after transradial coronary procedure. The outcome measures were patient tolerance of the device, local vascular complications, and the time taken to achieve hemostasis. Results : The mean age was 62.88 years, and 74.2% of the patients were men. Patient age, height, weight, wrist circumference, body mass index, male sex, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking incidences were similar in both groups. There were significantly more patients reporting no discomfort in the TR band group compared to the Radistop group (77% vs. 61%; P = 0.0001). Patients in the Radistop group reported significantly more pain across all categories of severity and three patients in the Radistop group were crossed over to TR band because of severe discomfort. Oozing and ecchymosis were seen in about 16% of the patients. Local small hematoma and large hematoma were seen in 5.4% and 2.2% patients respectively, and similar in both groups. Radial artery occlusion at the time of discharge was seen in 9.2% of the patients though only 6.8% showed persistent occlusion at the time of follow‐up. The time taken to achieve hemostasis was significantly longer in the TR Band group (5.32 ± 2.29 vs. 4.83 ± 2.23 hr; P = 0.004). There was significantly higher incidence of radial artery occlusion in patients with smaller wrist circumference, the patients who experienced radial artery spasm during the procedure, and patients with no heparin administration during the procedure. Conclusions : We have shown in a randomized comparison of Radistop and TR band that both devices are safe and effective as hemostatic compression devices following transradial procedures. However, more patients felt discomfort with the Radistop device and the time taken to achieve hemostasis was longer with TR band. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A comparison of the transradial and the transfemoral approach in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention

Background: Transradial coronary intervention is a safe and effective method of percutaneous revascularization. Furthermore, the indications for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are expanding. However, there is limited data on the efficacy and the safety of the transradial approach for chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI. Methods: We examined 468 patients who underwent CTO PCI between January 2003 and December 2005, and compared the radial (318 patients) and the femoral (150 patients) approach. Results: Baseline demographics, lesion location, and the vessel treated were similar in both groups. Angiographic success was 82% in radial versus 86% in femoral group, P = 0.28, similar in both groups. Total fluoroscopy time (24.49 ± 13.18 vs. 24.07 ± 14.12 min, P = 0.36), total procedure time (54.22 ± 25.35 vs. 60.23 ± 28.15 min, P = 0.23), and the use of total contrast volume (395.54 ± 180.25 vs. 406.15 ± 173.98 ml, P = 0.27) were similar in radial and femoral group, respectively. In hospital MACE [radial: 12 MI (3.8%) vs. femoral: 1 death (0.7%) and 5 MI (3.5%), P = 0.26] were similar in both groups. Access site vascular complications [radial: 11 (3.5%) vs. femoral: 17 (11.3%), P ≤ 0.001] were significantly less in radial group. Conclusions: The radial approach in CTO PCI is as fast and successful as the femoral approach with comparable in hospital MACE. However, there are far less access site complications with radial approach. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Management of iatrogenic radial artery perforation

The aim of this study was to evaluate a new protocol allowing coronary angiography to be performed transradially in spite of the occurrence of iatrogenic radial artery perforation during catheterization. Nine patients with iatrogenic radial artery perforation were managed conservatively by inserting a long arterial sheath in the damaged radial artery up to the brachial artery, after which the diagnostic and/or interventional procedures that had motivated transradial catheterization were completed via the protected radial artery. Radial angiography performed immediately thereafter showed no extravasation, and no major vascular complications developed during follow‐up. The day after the procedure, two patients had asymptomatic radial occlusion, but the other seven patients had normal radial pulses and reversed Allen test responses showing normal perfusion. A conservative management technique, installation of a long arterial sheath not only promotes resolution of iatrogenic radial artery perforation but also allows the procedures motivating catheterization to be completed transradially. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:74–78. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

It's still important,just doesn't hurt

• Radial artery catheterization results in local vascular injury to the artery and at times subsequent arterial occlusion, yet even in patients with abnormal collateral testing ischemic hand injury remains essentially unseen.
• Careful serial examinations of neuro‐muscular function of the hand in patients undergoing transradial catheterization demonstrate that even in the case of radial occlusion and an abnormal collateral test, hand function is not altered after the procedure.
• While radial artery occlusion may not result in functional ischemic findings, the occlusion itself results in lost future opportunity for vascular access or conduit use and further understanding on how to prevent this sequalae continues to be a priority.

     

Radial artery spasm during transradial coronary procedures

Although transradial access (TRA) for coronary procedures has many advantages over the transfemoral approach, it's still not the dominant route used in coronary interventions. Radial artery spasm (RAS) is an important limitation of TRA. We performed a search of published literature to estimate the prevalence and possible risk factors of RAS in patients undergoing transradial coronary procedure. Nineteen published papers including 7197 patients were identified as relevant; reported incidence of RAS was 14.7% altogether. It varies depending upon the criteria used, on applied premedications, and on sheath or catheter selection. Use of hydrophilic coated sheaths and catheters can reduce the incidence of RAS to 1%, while intra-arterial application of verapamil (1.25-5 mg) and nitroglycerin (100-200 μg) can reduce the incidence of RAS up to 3.8%. We concluded that RAS is still problematic in transradial access, and that besides hydrophilic materials, the use of intra-arterial vasodilators remains mandatory in RAS prevention. However, the optimal spasmolytic cocktail is yet to be confirmed by valid spasm criteria.