A Technique of “Chimney Nellix” for the Management of Type 1a Endoleak After EVAR

This report presents 3 procedures with visceral “chimney stenting” in conjunction with an endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) device, known as chEVAS, for treatment of type 1a endoleak. It includes the first published chEVAS in a patient with previous fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR). Cases include an 80-year-old man 8 years after FEVAR for a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA); an 85-year-old woman 9 months after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for a ruptured infrarenal AAA; and an 84-year-old woman 3 months after EVAR for a symptomatic infrarenal AAA. Technical success was achieved in all cases, with 1 postoperative death. The remaining 2 patients had no residual type 1a endoleak at 10 and 14 months respectively.     

Imaging and management of complications of open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Open repair is still considered the reference standard for long-term repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). In contrast to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), patients with open surgical repair of AAA are not routinely followed up with imaging. Although complications following EVAR are widely recognized and routinely identified on follow-up imaging, complications also do occur following open surgical repair. With frequent use of multi-slice computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) in vascular patients, there is now improved recognition of the potential complications following open surgical repair. Many of these complications are increasingly being managed using endovascular techniques. The aim of this review is to illustrate a variety of potential complications that may occur following open surgical repair and to demonstrate their management using both surgical and endovascular techniques.     

主动脉腔内修复术中髂内动脉保留技术

主动脉腔内修复术(EVAR)是腹主动脉瘤的主要治疗手段,腹主动脉瘤伴发髂动脉瘤时保留髂内动脉已成为共识,可避免发生臀肌缺血、乙状结肠缺血及男性性功能障碍等并发症.随着近年腔内器械不断更新,EVAR术中保留髂内动脉成为可能.目前EVAR术髂内动脉重建术包括腔内髂分支支架技术、三明治技术、髂总动脉覆膜支架喇叭口技术、髂外动脉-髂内动脉腔内分流技术(反向“烟囱”技术)以及弹簧圈栓塞技术,该文就此作一总结.     

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: how many patients are eligible for endovascular repair?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine how many patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are eligible for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed computed tomography (CT) angiograms obtained between January 2002 and June 2003 in 182 patients with suspected AAA. Indication for surgical or endovascular treatment was based on clinical and radiological criteria. The percentage of patients eligible for EVAR was evaluated. RESULTS: Out of a total of 182 patients with suspected AAA studied by CT angiography, after combined radiological-surgical assessment, 130 were considered eligible for surgical or endovascular treatment (71.4%). EVAR was indicated in 51 patients (39.3%, group A) and surgical repair was indicated in 79 patients (60.7%, group B). The reasons for ineligibility for EVAR were the following: unfavourable anatomy of the proximal neck in 41 patients (51.9%), diameter of the aneurysm sac >7 cm in 13 patients (16.4%), markedly tortuous/dilated iliac axis in six patients (7.6%), age <65 years in 17 patients (21.5%) and patient refusal in two cases (2.5%). There were no statistically significant differences in aneurysm diameter (52.7+/-0.8 versus 49.8+/-1.2 mm, p=ns), patients' age (73.2+/-1.2 versus 70.6+/-2.02 years, p=ns) or proximal neck length (2.95+/-1 versus 3.03+/-1.2 cm, p=ns) between groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms through the placement of aortic stent-grafts has now become a viable alternative to open surgery. In recent years, the number of patients treated with EVAR has steadily risen as a result of increased physician experience, availability of new and more versatile devices and improvements in noninvasive imaging techniques. Unfavourable neck anatomy is the primary factor for exclusion from endovascular repair.     

Endovascular Repair of Para-Anastomotic Aortoiliac Aneurysms

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of endovascular stent grafts in the treatment of para-anastomotic aneurysms (PAAs) as an alternative to high-risk open surgical repair. We identified all patients with previous open aortic aneurysm repair who underwent infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) at our institution from June 1998 to April 2007. Patient demographics, previous surgery, and operative complications were recorded. One hundred forty-eight patients underwent EVAR during the study period and 11 patients had previous aortic surgery. Of these 11 redo patients, the mean age was 62 years at initial surgery and 71 years at EVAR. All patients were male. Initial open repair was for rupture in five (45%) patients. The average time between initial and subsequent reintervention was 9 years. All patients were ASA Grade III or IV. Fifty-five percent of the PAAs involved the iliac arteries, 36% the abdominal aorta, and 9% were aortoiliac. Ten patients had endovascular stent-grafts inserted electively, and one patient presented with a contained leak. Aorto-uni-iliac stent-grafts were deployed in seven patients, and bifurcated stent-grafts in four patients. A 100% successful deployment rate was achieved. Perioperative mortality was not seen and one patient needed surgical reintervention to correct an endoleak. Endovascular repair of PAAs is safe and feasible. It is a suitable alternative and has probably now become the treatment of choice in the management of PAAs.     

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with stent-grafts: experimental models can reproduce endoleaks

PURPOSE: To develop canine aneurysm models that can reproduce type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with stent-grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fusiform infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm model (AAA) was surgically created with a jugular vein patch, while preserving collateral vessels (n = 3). To allow comparative studies within the same animal, a bilateral iliac aneurysm model was also constructed with venous patches and surgical re-implantation of the sacroiliac trunk (n = 3). Stent-grafts were implanted by femoral approach at least 2 months later in both aortic and iliac models. Follow-up imaging was performed by Doppler ultrasound (US) and angiography until animals were killed 3 months after EVAR. RESULTS: Angiography revealed immediate type II leaks in all cases. Leaks were still present at autopsy 3 months after EVAR in all cases, and were revealed at pre-death angiography in all but one case. At autopsy, leaks were characterized by the presence of large endothelialized channels that formed within the thrombus between the stent-graft and the aneurysmal wall. CONCLUSION: As shown in this pilot study, persistent type II leaks after EVAR can be reproduced in aortic and iliac animal models. The iliac model can be created bilaterally in the same animal, thus allowing for comparative evaluation of different therapies. These models could be used to better understand the mechanisms of endoleak, and to assess future developments aimed to improve the outcomes after EVAR.     

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: feasibility and impact on early outcome

PURPOSE: Open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) still has a high associated mortality rate. The impact of the introduction of endovascular treatment on the early outcomes of ruptured AAAs was examined at a single institution. The suitability of acute endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with ruptured AAAs was also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was conducted in 39 consecutive patients treated for ruptured AAA from 2001 to 2004. The patients were divided into 15 who underwent open repair from 2001 to 2002 (group I) and 24 who were treated with open repair (n=13; 54%) or endovascular repair (n=11; 46%) from 2003 to 2004 (group II). Hospital charts and computed tomographic scans were reviewed to evaluate the feasibility of EVAR. RESULTS: Age, sex, and aneurysm size were similar between the two groups. The 30-day mortality rates were 53% in group I and 8% in group II (P=.003). Median procedure times were shorter in the patients who underwent EVAR. Intensive care unit stay and hospital stay were 22.0 days+/-29.6 and 29.7 days+/-33.8, respectively, in group I, and 5.6 days+/-4.4 and 16.1 days+/-10.9, respectively, in group II (P<.03). Eleven patients were found ineligible for EVAR as a result of an unsuitable neck (n=5) or iliac arteries (n=3) or both (n=3). No graft failure was detected during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: After introduction of acute EVAR, a total of 46% of patients with ruptured AAAs were treated with the procedure. Potentially, 54% of patients could have been suitable for EVAR. Endovascular stent-graft implantation has significantly improved outcomes in ruptured AAAs and may therefore be beneficial in the overall treatment strategy in these patients.     

Large Diameter Limbs for Dilated Common Iliac Arteries in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Is It Safe?

In this prospective study we examined whether dilated common iliac arteries (CIAs) can provide a safe distal seal in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the use of bifurcated stent grafts with large diameter limbs. Sixteen patients with 26 dilated CIAs with a diameter of 6 mm who were offered EVAR using stent grafts with large diameter limbs were included in the study (Group A). Forty-two patients who also underwent EVAR without iliac dilatation, matched for age, sex and surgical risk were used for comparison (controls-Group B). In group A mean CIA diameter was 18.2 mm (16–28) and mean abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter was 6.87 ± 1.05 cm; mean age was 77.2 ± 4.8 yrs (67–81). Mean follow-up was 33.6 months (2.8 yrs). CIA diameter changes and development of endoleaks were assessed by CT angiography (CTA). Overall iliac dilatation was present in 16/58 of our patients (27.6%). In 10 patients dilatation was bilateral (17.3%). Partial or complete flow to the internal iliac artery (IIA) territories was preserved in all patients post-EVAR. On follow-up, stable caliber of the dilated CIAs was observed in 21 patients (84%), enlargement of 1mm in 3 (16%), and failure of the distal attachment in 1 (6.2%). Compared to the control group there was no statistical significance in the incidence of complications. Dilated common iliac arteries provide a safe distal seal in patients who have undergone EVAR, thus obviating the need for additional endovascular procedures and sparing flow in the IIA vascular bed.     

Endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aneurysm: a retrospective analysis of CT follow-up

Retrospective radiologic and clinical midterm follow-up is reported for 10 patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (IAAA) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). At a mean follow-up of 33 months, regression of the thickness of the perianeurysmal fibrosis (PAF) and decrease of aneurysmal sac diameter was observed in nine patients. Four EVAR-associated complications were observed: periinterventional dissection of femoral artery (n = 1), blue toe syndrome (n = 1), and stent-graft disconnection (n = 2). EVAR is the less invasive method of aneurysm exclusion in patients with IAAA with a comparable evolution of the PAF as reported after open repair.     

Delayed complications following EVAR

More than a decade after the first clinical attempts, two large randomized studies have proven that endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) provides immediate advantages over open repair. In the long run, however, a relatively high number of reinterventions is necessary to improve the long-term efficacy of EVAR, which may outweigh the early benefits. Since EVAR is gaining popularity in the medical community and in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), it is expected that a growing number of patients will present with delayed complications requiring some kind of reinterventions. For the patient's safety, vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists involved in EVAR must be well aware of these complications and the ways to overcome them. We began our endovascular program for AAA in 1994 and currently follow 485 patients with a variety of manufactured grafts. In this article we describe the delayed complications observed with EVAR, their mechanisms, favoring factors, and ways to treat them.     

Preoperative Evaluation and Endovascular Procedure of Intraoperative Aneurysm Rupture During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Thoracic aortic aneurysms are now routinely repaired with endovascular repair if anatomically feasible because of advantages in safety and recovery. However, intraoperative aneurysm rupture is a severe complication which may have an adverse effect on the outcome of treatment. Comprehensive preoperative assessment and considerate treatment are keys to success of endovascular aneurysm repair, especially during unexpected circumstances. Few cases have reported on intraoperative aortic rupture, which were successfully managed by endovascular treatment. Here, we present a rare case of an intraoperative aneurysm rupture during endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm with narrow neck and angulated aorta arch (coarctation-associated aneurysm), which was successfully treated using double access route approach and iliac limbs of infrarenal devices. Level 5.     

Endovascular Treatment of Proximal Bilateral Iliac Limb Dislocation and Kinking following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

We report the case of a 69-year-old man with a late type 1b endoleak due to proximal migration of both iliac limbs 5 years after endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The endovascular method used to correct bilaterally this condition is described. Final angiographic control shows patency of the stent-graft without signs of endoleak.     

Geometrical Factors Influencing the Hemodynamic Behavior of the AAA Stent Grafts: Essentials for the Clinician

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is considered to be the treatment of choice for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Despite the initial technical success, EVAR is amenable to early and late complications, among which the migration of the endograft (EG) with subsequent proximal endoleak (Type Ia) leads to repressurization of the AAA sac, exposure to excessive wall stress, and, hence, to potential rupture. This article discusses the influence that certain geometrical factors, such as neck angulation, iliac bifurcation, EG curvature, neck-to-iliac diameter, and length ratios, as well as iliac limbs configuration can exert on the hemodynamic behavior of the EGs. The information provided could help both clinicians and EG manufacturers towards further development and improvement of EG designs and better operational planning.     

Time-resolved MR angiography for the classification of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of time-resolved MR angiography (TR-MRA), compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA), in the classification of endoleaks in patients who have undergone endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients who had undergone EVAR to repair an abdominal aortic aneurysm were evaluated with both TR-MRA and DSA to determine endoleak etiology. The patient population consisted of 26 men and 5 women with a mean age of 78.5 years (range, 55-93 years). The mean time interval between TR-MRA and DSA was 1.5 weeks (range, 1-8 weeks). Endoleaks were classified as type II when enhancement of the external iliac vessels was observed before the appearance of the endoleak; otherwise the endoleak was classified as type I or III. The results of TR-MRA classification were compared with the reference gold standard, DSA. RESULTS: Agreement between TR-MRA and DSA regarding endoleak classification occurred in 30 of 31 cases (97%). Discordant classification occurred in a case in which a Type II endoleak was misclassified as a Type III due to failure to visualize a lumbar vessel. CONCLUSION: TR-MRA is highly effective in classifying endoleaks following EVAR when compared with DSA.     

The burden of hard atherosclerotic plaques does not promote endoleak development after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a risk stratification

Purpose  

To objectify the influence of the atherosclerotic burden in the proximal landing zone on the development of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) using objective aortic calcium scoring (ACS).     

Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Chimney and Snorkel Grafts: Indications, Techniques and Results

The chimney technique in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (Ch-EVAR) involves placement of a stent or stent-graft parallel to the main aortic stent-graft to extend the proximal or distal sealing zone while maintaining side branch patency. Ch-EVAR can facilitate endovascular repair of juxtarenal and aortic arch pathology using available standard aortic stent-grafts, therefore, eliminating the manufacturing delays required for customised fenestrated and branched stent-grafts. Several case series have demonstrated the feasibility of Ch-EVAR both in acute and elective cases with good early results. This review discusses indications, technique, and the current available clinical data on Ch-EVAR.     

Endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms: pre- and postprocedural imaging

Endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms is a safe alternative to conventional open surgical repair. Clinical success, however, is highly dependent on patient selection. Diagnostic vascular imaging has an essential role for this selection process. Following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), patients require long-term surveillance and again vascular imaging serves an integral function. This article reviews EVAR selection criteria and post-EVAR assessment and then discusses the imaging modalities used to evaluate these patients, namely multi-detector-row computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance imaging/angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and catheter angiography.     

Surveillance After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is widely considered mandatory. The purpose of surveillance is to detect asymptomatic complications, so that early secondary intervention can prevent late aneurysm rupture. CT angiography has been taken as the reference standard imaging test, but there is increasing interest in using other modalities to reduce the use of ionising radiation and iodinated contrast. As a result, there is wide heterogeneity in surveillance strategies used among EVAR centres. We reviewed the current evidence available on the outcomes of different imaging modalities and surveillance strategies following EVAR.     

局部麻醉穿刺下完全无对比剂腔内修复腹主动脉瘤1例

目的 探讨对比剂过敏高危腹主动脉瘤患者接受局部麻醉穿刺下完全无对比剂主动脉腔内修复术(EVAR)的可行性.方法 对1例对比剂过敏腹主动脉瘤患者,在不使用对比剂、局部麻醉穿刺条件下实施EVAR术.结果 手术获成功.术后MRI随访结果显示,患者腹主动脉瘤完全隔绝,无内漏,覆膜支架内血流通畅,双侧肾动脉显影良好.结论 局部麻醉穿刺下完全无对比剂EVAR术治疗对比剂过敏伴全身麻醉禁忌高危腹主动脉瘤患者安全有效,但严格掌握适应证、术前充分评估是手术成功的关键.     

Late Type III endoleak and graft failure of an Ancure stent-graft

The authors report a case of a delayed type IIIb endoleak with sac expansion 6 years after an endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm with an Ancure bifurcated stent-graft. The presumed etiology of the leak was secondary to erosion of the main body graft material by metal stents placed within the graft to correct kinking of the iliac limbs at the index operation. The endoleak was successfully treated by endovascular means with an aortouni-iliac device, contralateral iliac plug followed by a femoral-to-femoral bypass graft.