Staging of pelvic endometriosis using magnetic resonance imaging compared with the laparoscopic classification of the American Fertility Society: a prospective study

PURPOSE: To introduce a staging of pelvic endometriosis based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) features, compared with the American Fertility Society (AFS) laparoscopic classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive females with clinically suspected endometriosis underwent MRI examination using TSE T1, T2W, and SE FAT-SAT T1W sequences, to demonstrate the presence of endometriomas and pelvic implants. Laparoscopy was performed within two weeks (mean 8 days) of the examination. A radiologist experienced in pelvic pathology evaluated the presence of endometriomas and implants and calculated a score to classify endometriosis in four classes, comparable with those of AFS laparoscopic staging. The MRI score was based on size, edges, wall thickness, septations, signal intensity on T2-weighted images of endometriomas and presence of pelvic implants. The concordance between MRI and laparoscopic classification was evaluated using k-statistics. RESULTS: Laparoscopy confirmed 47/48 endometriomas, ranging in size from 10 to 62 mm, detected by MRI, with only one false positive due to an hemorrhagic corpus luteum. Nevertheless, 2 intra-ovarian endometriomas were detected by laparoscopy only thanks MRI guidance. Implants were discovered in 17/30 patients with MRI, laparoscopically in 18/30. MRI detected 46 endometrial implants out of 57 detected by laparoscopy (80.7%): 17/46 implants were directly confirmed by laparoscopy, 29/46 were indirectly confirmed by the presence of adhesions. As regards staging, there was agreement between the MRI and AFS classification in 33/35 patients with only two case of discordance (K= 0,892). CONCLUSIONS: Although MRI has limitations such as suboptimal depiction of small implants and adhesions, this technique is very useful for guiding laparoscopy. Moreover, the high level of agreement (96.6%) between the MRI staging proposed in this paper and laparoscopic classification demonstrates a further advantage of the use of MRI in the preoperative staging of endometriosis.     

Posterior cul-de-sac obliteration associated with endometriosis: MR imaging evaluation

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in depicting posterior cul-de-sac obliteration in patients with endometriosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was not required for this retrospective study, but informed consent was obtained from all patients. MR images obtained between January 1989 and December 2000 in 57 women (mean age, 39 years; age range, 26-52 years) with histologically confirmed endometriosis were retrospectively evaluated by four radiologists independently. All patients underwent laparotomy or laparoscopy less than 1 month after MR imaging. MR images were evaluated for the presence and location of endometrial implants and adhesions. MR images were also scored for the presence of five findings: retroflexed uterus, elevated posterior vaginal fornix, intestinal tethering or tethered appearance of rectum in direction of uterus, faint strands between uterus and intestine, and fibrotic plaque or nodule covering serosal surface of the uterus. Interobserver agreement for each of the five findings and for the overall diagnosis of cul-de-sac obliteration was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and kappa statistics were determined. RESULTS: Laparotomy or laparoscopy revealed posterior cul-de-sac obliteration in 30 patients. Overall, the four radiologists had mean accuracies of 89.0% and 76.3% for diagnosing endometrial implants and adhesions, respectively, at MR imaging. Overall, the radiologists achieved mean sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of 68.4%, 76.0%, 71.9%, 76.6%, and 68.5%, respectively, in diagnosing posterior cul-de-sac obliteration. The best accuracy (mean value, 64.5%) was obtained with the finding of fibrotic plaque in the uterine serosal surface. Readers agreed on the observations 63.2%-91.2% of the time. For the impression of the presence or absence of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration, interobserver agreement varied between substantial and moderate: Mean interobserver agreement was 78.4% (range, 70.2%-84.2%), and mean kappa was 0.57 (range, 0.40-0.67). Mean accuracy of MR imaging for diagnosing posterior cul-de-sac obliteration was 71.9%. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that use of the described MR imaging findings may enable diagnosis of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration.     

Assessment of pelvic endometriosis: correlation of US and MRI with laparoscopic findings

Purpose.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis and local staging of endometriosis by comparing results with laparoscopic findings.

Materials and methods.

We evaluated 36 consecutive women with suspected or clinically diagnosed endometriosis. Thirty–two out of 36 patients met the following inclusion criteria: transabdominal and endocavitary (US) examination and MR imaging, followed by laparoscopy performed within 2 weeks. US and MR findings were classified based on location, number and morphology (small nodules, large nodules, laminar lesions, cystic lesions, complex lesions, adhesions, cul–de–sac obliteration).

Results.

Laparoscopy, considered the gold standard, identified 143 lesions in 32 patients. US detected 101 lesions, and MR detected 92 lesions, which were subsequently divided by morphologic appearance. Sensitivity and specificity of the two imaging techniques in the recognition of the different locations were 58% and 25%, respectively, for US and 56% and 50%, respectively, for MR imaging. Results of the two techniques in the different locations examined were similar, with the exception of lesions in the rectovaginal septum, which were better detected by US, and for adhesions and cul–de–sac obliteration, which were more easily detected by MR.

Conclusions.

Both US and MR are accurate in the diagnosis of endometriosis. There are no significant differences in staging of pelvic endometriosis between US and MR. US examination is the primary evaluation in cases of suspected disease and for the rectovaginal septum. MR examination is recommended for correct classification in doubtful cases and in cases of suspected extrapelvic lesions and adhesions.     

Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Endometriosis is an important gynecologic disorder primarily affecting women during their reproductive years. Pathologically, it is the result of functional endometrium located outside the uterus. It may vary from microscopic endometriotic implants to large cysts (endometriomas). The physical manifestations are protean, with some patients being asymptomatic and others having disabling pelvic pain, infertility, or adnexal masses. Symptoms do not necessarily correlate with the severity of the disease. Ultrasonographic (US) features are variable and can mimic those of other benign and malignant ovarian lesions. Low-level internal echoes and echogenic wall foci are more specific US features for endometriomas. Magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnostic accuracy, with endometriotic cysts typically appearing with high signal intensity on T1-weighted images and demonstrating "shading" on T2-weighted images. The ovaries are the most common sites affected, but endometriosis can also involve the gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, chest, and soft tissues. Small implants and adhesions are not well evaluated radiologically; therefore, laparoscopy remains the standard of reference for diagnosis and staging. Both medical and surgical treatment options are available depending on the patient's specific case.     

Endometriosis: appearance and detection at MR imaging

Thirty-nine magnetic resonance (MR) studies were performed on 31 women with surgically proved endometriosis. A total of 88 endometriotic lesions ranging in size from 0.2 to 7.5 cm were detected on 24 of 30 MR images of women. The signal intensities ranged from hyperintense on all pulse sequences (41 of 88) to hypointense on all sequences (24 of 88); the remainder demonstrated signal intensities corresponding to the appearances of acute, subacute, and chronic hematomas. Hypointense or signal-void rims on both T1- and T2-weighted images were detected in 35 lesions. Identification of the disease with MR imaging versus concurrent surgery was compared for 76 sites in 19 patients. Findings were true-positive in 24 cases, false-negative in ten, true-negative in 32, and false-positive in seven, resulting in an MR sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 82%. Adhesions obscured the disease at laparoscopy in three patients. MR imaging cannot be used as a substitute for laparoscopy in the definitive diagnosis or staging of endometriosis. However, it can be used to monitor treatment response in place of laparoscopy once a diagnosis is firmly established.     

MR imaging of the female pelvic region.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a valuable technique for noninvasive evaluation of the female pelvic region. This article presents the normal anatomy and abnormalities of the female pelvis. MR imaging may be more useful than clinical evaluation or other imaging modalities in diagnosing or staging developmental anomalies, leiomyomas, adenomyosis, endometrial or cervical carcinoma, vaginal neoplasms, ovarian cysts, endometriosis, teratomas, polycystic ovaries, or other ovarian masses. It could potentially replace laparoscopy as a more useful tool in the diagnosis of uterine anomalies. MR imaging is generally capable of helping determine whether a pelvic mass is uterine or adnexal in origin and may be used to characterize some adnexal masses. In some cases, MR imaging is used to differentiate recurrent disease from posttreatment fibrosis, which aids in treatment planning.     

Ovarian carcinoma in patients with endometriosis: MR imaging findings

OBJECTIVE: Various types of malignancy can develop in patients with endometriosis. Enhancing mural nodules have been reported as an imaging characteristic of malignant transformations. We evaluated contrast-enhanced MR imaging to determine the optimum sequence to reveal mural nodules and other characteristics of malignant transformations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 10 patients with pathologically proven ovarian adenocarcinoma in endometriosis and 10 patients (the control group) with ovarian endometrioma suggestive of malignant transformation on the basis of sonographic findings. We analyzed the size and nature of the endometriomas in each patient. We compared four types of contrast-enhanced MR imaging to determine which sequence best revealed mural nodules. RESULTS: In the malignant and control groups, 80% of the cysts with findings suggestive of malignant transformation showed unilateral disease or larger endometrial cysts on the suggestive side than on the contralateral side. High signal intensity on T1-weighted images and low signal intensity on T2-weighted images relative to the myometrium were observed only in two of 10 malignant endometrial cysts and in all control cysts. All malignant endometriomas had small mural nodules with low signal intensity on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images. Only three benign endometriomas had mural nodules and none of them enhanced. The enhancement of mural nodules was easily seen on dynamic subtraction imaging. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our findings, endometrial cysts with malignant transformation rarely show low signal intensity on T2-weighted images and usually have enhancing mural nodules. Because the enhancement of mural nodules is often difficult to evaluate on conventional T1-weighted images, dynamic subtraction imaging can be valuable.     

Feasibility of 3.0T pelvic MR imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis

Introduction

Endometriosis represents an important clinical problem in women of reproductive age with high impact on quality of life, work productivity and health care management. The aim of this study is to define the role of 3 T magnetom system MRI in the evaluation of endometriosis.

Materials and methods

Forty-six women, with transvaginal (TV) ultrasound examination positive for endometriosis, with pelvic pain, or infertile underwent an MR 3.0 T examination with the following protocol: T2 weighted FRFSE HR sequences, T2 weighted FRFSE HR CUBE 3D sequences, T1 w FSE sequences, LAVA-flex sequences. Pelvic anatomy, macroscopic endometriosis implants, deep endometriosis implants, fallopian tube involvement, adhesions presence, fluid effusion in Douglas pouch, uterus and kidney pathologies or anomalies associated and sacral nervous routes were considered by two radiologists in consensus. Laparoscopy was considered the gold standard.

Results

MRI imaging diagnosed deep endometriosis in 22/46 patients, endometriomas not associated to deep implants in 9/46 patients, 15/46 patients resulted negative for endometriosis, 11 of 22 patients with deep endometriosis reported ovarian endometriosis cyst. We obtained high percentages of sensibility (96.97%), specificity (100.00%), VPP (100.00%), VPN (92.86%).

Conclusion

Pelvic MRI performed with 3 T system guarantees high spatial and contrast resolution, providing accurate information about endometriosis implants, with a good pre-surgery mapping of the lesions involving both bowels and bladder surface and recto-uterine ligaments.     

Endometrial carcinoma staging by MR imaging

The potential of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of endometrial carcinoma and in the assessment of its extent was evaluated prospectively in 51 patients clinically suspected of having the disease. MR imaging findings were compared with the results of surgical-pathologic staging and lymph node sampling following hysterectomy. Histologic findings showed 45 patients to have endometrial carcinoma, three to have no residual tumor after dilatation and curettage, and three to have adenomatous hyperplasia of the endometrium. MR imaging demonstrated an endometrial abnormality in 43 of the 51 patients (84%). Endometrial carcinoma could not be differentiated from adenomatous hyperplasia or blood clots. Therefore, MR imaging was not specific for tumor detection, and histologic diagnosis remains essential. The overall accuracy of MR imaging in staging endometrial carcinoma was 92%; its overall accuracy in demonstrating the depth of myometrial invasion was 82%. Demonstration of lymphadenopathy and adnexal or peritoneal metastases by MR imaging was suboptimal.     

Clinical outcome in female patients with pelvic pain and normal pelvic US findings

PURPOSE: To understand the clinical outcome in patients with pelvic pain and negative pelvic ultrasonographic (US) findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 86 female patients with pelvic pain and normal pelvic US findings seen in a US section over a 15-month period were evaluated 6-21 months after US. Medical chart review follow-up was available in 86 patients, and telephone interview follow-up was conducted in 85 patients. We collected data on the outcome of pain; subsequent imaging, treatment, and surgery; and the duration of pain before US. RESULTS: Pelvic pain improved or resolved in 66 (77%) of the 86 patients. In the group with acute or subacute pain (duration 6 months), seven (50%) of the 14 patients had improved symptoms. Further imaging (13 studies) was performed in nine patients: Twelve studies were normal, and one computed tomographic scan (1 month after the first US examination) showed diverticulitis. Eleven patients underwent 19 surgical procedures (endometrial sampling, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, or hysterectomy). Four demonstrated clinically important disease (endometriosis and pelvic varices, endometriosis, adenomyosis, or pelvic adhesions). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with pelvic pain and normal pelvic US findings had improvement or resolution of their symptoms, and those with acute or subacute pain were more likely to report improvement or resolution of pain than those with chronic pain. The yield of further imaging studies was low, and disease was identified in a minority of patients.     

Endometriosis: Appearance and detection with conventional and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo techniques

Suspected pelvic endometrlosis was prospectively evaluated in 31 women with T1- and T2-weighted conventional spin-echo (CSE) magnetic resonance imaging alone and in combination with Tl-weighted fat-suppressed (TIPS) and gadolinium-enhanced TIPS (Gd-TlFS) spin-echo techniques. Images were grouped for interpretation and comparison as follows: (a) CSE alone, (b) CSE/T1FS. and (c) CSE/T1FS/ Gd-TlFS. All patients underwent surgery within 3 months of imaging, and 21 patients were found to have endometrlosis: 59 endometriomas (26 large and 33 small) and 51 sites of implants were seen. With CSE images, 23 large and six small endometriomas were detected. With CSE/T1FS images, 25 large and 14 small endometriomas were identified. With CSE/ TIFS/Gd-TlFS Images, 24 large and 14 small endometriomas were detected and ill-defined areas of enhancement were noted in 22 sites throughout the pelvis. These corresponded to endometriotic implants seen at surgery in 14 sites. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, for the detection of endometriosis were 76%, 60%, and 71% for CSE, 86%, 50%, and 74% for CSE/T1FS, and 81%, 50%, and 71% for CSE/TlFS/Gd-TlFS images. No significant differences (P > 0.1) between image combinations for correctly identifying patients with and without endometriosis were seen. The difference in sensitivity between CSE and CSE/T1FS and between CSE and CSE/TlFS/Gd-TlFS images for detecting small endometriomas was significant (P=.03).     

The ability of helical CT to preoperatively stage endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated helical CT as an imaging modality for preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiologists retrospectively and independently reviewed the preoperative helical CT scans of 25 consecutive patients with endometrial carcinoma. The presence or absence of deep myometrial invasion and the presence or absence of cervical involvement were evaluated on helical CT and compared with pathologic findings at hysterectomy. RESULTS: Helical CT has a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 42% for the detection of deep myometrial invasion (stage IC). Helical CT has a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 70% for the detection of cervical involvement (state II). These results compare poorly with those of MR imaging (sensitivity 92%, specificity 90% for the detection of deep myometrial invasion; sensitivity 86%, specificity 97% for the detection of cervical involvement). CONCLUSION: Helical CT is insensitive and nonspecific compared with MR imaging for the preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma. MR imaging remains the imaging modality of choice.     

Deep pelvic endometriosis: accuracy of pelvic MRI completed by MR colonography

Purpose

This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging completed by MR colonography for the preoperative evaluation of deep pelvic endometriosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Materials and methods

A total of 143 patients (mean age 34.3±5.1 years) with a clinical suspicion of deep pelvic endometriosis were assessed by pelvic MR and MR colonography. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery 3–10 weeks after the MR examination. The presence, location, number and extent of endometriotic lesions were evaluated. Data obtained with MR were compared with surgical findings. MR sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values and diagnostic accuracy values were calculated for each site by considering the laparoscopic and histological findings as the reference standard.

Results

Laparoscopy confirmed the presence of endometriosis in 119/143 patients (83%); in 76/119 (64%) deep pelvic endometriosis was diagnosed, whereas in the remaining 43/119 (36%), superficial peritoneal implants and endometriomas were found. In 32/119 (27%) patients, intestinal lesions were detected. MR had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy values of 67–100%, 85–100%, 83–100%, 84–100% and 84–100%, respectively, in recognising lesions located in different pelvic sites.

Conslucions

MR imaging combined with colonography is a highly accurate tool for characterising deep endometriotic lesions in patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery. In particular, MR colonography has very high accuracy in detecting colorectal involvement.     

Infiltrative endometriosis without endometrioma: A case report and imaging findings mimicking a bladder malignancy

Endometriosis affects 10%-15% of women of childbearing age, but the incidence can be as high as 90% in those with chronic pelvic pain. Endometriosis is categorized into ovarian endometriomas, superficial peritoneal implants, and deep infiltrating endometriosis. In this case report a 40-year-old woman gravida 1, para 1 with a history of hysterectomy in Mexico presented with chronic abdominal pain and severe hematuria. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an infiltrative pelvic mass involving the bladder concerning for a neoplasm that demonstrated subtle hyperintense components on T1-weighted images. The diagnosis of infiltrative endometriosis was established following cystoscopy and tissue sampling. This case highlights the importance of considering endometriosis in the differential for patients with pelvic masses, and recognizing potential features that could suggest the diagnosis.     

Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography.

The purpose of this study was to compare the relative accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (n = 26), endovaginal sonography (EVS) (n = 14), and hysterosalpingography (HSG) (n = 20) in the classification of müllerian duct anomalies in 26 patients. There were 24 cases of surgically proved anomaly, and two patients had normal uteri (one with a vaginal septum). MR imaging allowed diagnosis of 24 of 24 cases (accuracy, 100%), and EVS was correct in 11 of 12 cases (accuracy, 92%). HSG was correct in only four cases. In the diagnosis of septate uterus, MR imaging demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and EVS demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80%. Both MR imaging and EVS demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% in distinguishing those anomalies that did not require surgery. The high accuracy of MR imaging and EVS permit noninvasive differentiation of uterine anomalies and can spare women diagnostic laparoscopy, promoting cost-effective diagnosis.     

宫腔镜在辅助生殖中的应用意义分析

目的探讨宫腔镜检查术在辅助生殖技术中应用的重要性。方法回顾性分析2010年9月—2011年10月在我院接受检查的265例不孕症患者宫腔镜检查资料,其中90例患者因试管婴儿失败而行宫腔镜检查。结果 265例不孕患者中宫腔正常者124例,占46.8%,宫腔异常者141例,占53.2%。宫腔粘连86例(占32.5%),子宫内膜息肉39例(占15%),子宫内膜炎22例(占8.3%)。宫腔粘连在继发不孕中的检出率高于原发不孕。子宫内膜息肉的检出率在两组中无统计学差异。90例因试管婴儿失败而行宫腔镜检者中有68例存在宫腔病变(占76%),包括子宫内膜炎、子宫内膜息肉、宫腔粘连等。结论宫腔镜检查具有良好的可接受性和准确性,有较高的阳性发现率,可及时发现不孕症患者的宫内病变,应作为辅助生殖技术治疗前的常规检查。     

Role of magnetic resonance in the staging of endometrial carcinoma

Biopsy is the technique of choice for the definitive diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Since lymphatic tumor spread has been demonstrated to depend on the degree of myometrial involvement, the definition of the latter with imaging techniques may significantly affect both prognosis and therapy. We investigated, by means of MR imaging at 0.5 T, 14 patients with endometrial carcinoma, to assess both tumor stage and myometrial involvement. FIGO staging system was employed, and M parameter evaluated (M0 = no myometrial involvement; M1 = involvement confined to the inner third; M2 = involvement confined to the middle third; M3 = involvement of the whole myometrium). Another parameter was the characteristic high signal of the tumor on PD and T2W images. The patients were then operated and MR information was correlated with surgical findings. Overall diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging was 85.7% in tumor staging, and 92.2% in defining M parameter. Tumor spread into adnexa and into cervical canal was poorly demonstrated by MR imaging.     

Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may aid in preoperative treatment planning of endometrial carcinoma by accurately estimating tumor volume, depth of myometrial invasion, and extrauterine extension. Preoperative MR scans were obtained on 24 women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer. MR scans were evaluated for uterine size, as an indirect measure of tumor volume, and depth of myometrial invasion. MR detected deep invasion (greater than or equal to 50% of myometrial thickness) with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 83% (accuracy 79%) when compared with the pathologic findings. MR staging may assist in deciding which patients should have lymph node dissection at surgery and may aid in decisions regarding adjunctive radiation therapy.     

Evaluation of pelvic adhesions using multiphase and multislice MR imaging with kinematic display.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether kinematic multiphase and multislice MR imaging could reveal pelvic adhesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Before surgery, 52 women with gynecologic disorders underwent half-Fourier acquisition single-shot fast spin-echo imaging with multiphase and multislice acquisitions. Images were displayed in a cine mode, and the motion of each organ against adjacent organs was evaluated by two radiologists who were unaware of the patients' histories or of the findings of their clinical examinations or surgeries. Findings from MR imaging were classified into three types relative to the adjacent organs: type 1, sliding, defined as organs moving 1 cm or more; type 2, fine motion, defined as organs moving less than 1 cm; or type 3, no motion. Type 2 was further subdivided into two groups: type 2-A, independent fine movement, and type 2-B, synchronous fine movement. All MR imaging findings were verified by laparotomy or laparoscopy. Peristalsis at the rectum, colon, and small intestine were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 317 interfaces were evaluated. For findings of type 1 (n = 8 interfaces) and type 2-A (n = 245) on kinematic MR imaging, the negative predictive values for adhesions were 100% and 95.5%, respectively. Findings of type 2-B (n = 52) and type 3 (n = 12) with no adhesions were observed in 40.4% and 66.7%, respectively. When type 1 and type 2-A were regarded as negative findings of adhesions, and type 2-B and type 3 as positive, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 72.5%, 87.4%, and 85.4%, respectively. Peristalsis was observed in 69.2% of patients at the rectum, 86.5% at the colon, and 100% at the small intestine. CONCLUSION: Multiphase and multislice MR imaging with kinematic display may provide new information about the presence of pelvic adhesions.     

MR imaging of pelvic masses in women: contrast-enhanced vs unenhanced images.

OBJECTIVE. We compared the value of contrast-enhanced MR images with that of T2-weighted MR images in the diagnosis and staging of pelvic masses in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The findings on preoperative MR studies of 97 patients with a total of 124 surgically proved lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo images were compared with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. The final diagnosis included benign (36 patients), borderline (six patients), and malignant (15 patients) ovarian masses, fallopian tube masses (15 patients), endometrial tumors (seven patients), cervical carcinomas (32 patients), subserous leiomyomas (11 patients), and two masses of extragenital origin. RESULTS. In the depiction of pelvic lesions, the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced MR imaging (96%) was equal to that of unenhanced T2-weighted imaging (97%). Contrast-enhanced images were useful in the definition of intratumoral architecture and tumor borders of 72 adnexal masses, resulting in better determination of malignancy (accuracy, 95%) than on T2-weighted images (85%). Size of viable tumor, differentiation of tumor from retained fluid, and depth of myometrial invasion of six endometrial carcinomas were most reliably shown on contrast-enhanced images. In the evaluation of cervical carcinoma, overall staging accuracy of contrast-enhanced imaging (80%) was slightly inferior to that of T2-weighted imaging (83%). However, contrast-enhanced images improved assessment of parametrial and organ invasion in seven cases in which findings on T2-weighted MR images were equivocal. Administration of contrast material was not helpful in the evaluation of subserous leiomyomas or masses of extragenital origin. CONCLUSIONS. The findings suggest that when results of unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging of pelvic masses are equivocal, contrast-enhanced MR images should be used as supportive and complementary pulse sequences to (1) improve definition of intratumoral architecture and prediction of malignancy in adnexal tumors, (2) stage endometrial carcinoma, and (3) determine tumor extension in cervical carcinoma.