Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer?

Background

The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying residual disease after breast conservation therapy (BCT) is unclear.

Method

Review of an institutional database identified patients with positive or close (≤2 mm) margins undergoing MRI before re-excision. Histopathologic correlation was performed.

Results

Forty-three women underwent MRI after BCT. MRI suggested residual disease in 29 patients, of whom 20 (69%) had residual carcinoma pathologically. Nine patients had false-positive MRI as seen by benign pathology findings. Fourteen MRIs indicated no residual disease, of which 6 had residual disease pathologically. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of MRI was 77% and 69%, respectively. MRI conducted within 28 days of the original surgery was 85% sensitive. MRI performed after 28 days was 69% sensitive.

Conclusions

MRI is able to detect residual disease among most patients undergoing re-excision. False-positive results may be caused by inflammatory processes that resemble residual disease.     

Are risk factors for breast cancer similar in women with inflammatory breast cancer and in those with non-inflammatory breast cancer?

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare reproductive factors in patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), and with non-inflammatory breast cancer (non-IBC). The study was performed in two centers: one French including 49 IBC patients and 140 non-IBC and another Tunisian including 97 IBC and 139 non-IBC. Unconditional logistic regression was used for the analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The French IBC patients had a lower educational level, a higher body mass index and a longer cumulative duration of breast-feeding, and they included a greater proportion of non-European women, than the non-IBC patients. In the multivariate analysis, only breast-feeding duration remained associated with the IBC status (P=10(-3)). These results could not be verified in the Tunisian series, because the duration of breast-feeding was unavailable in this center. RESULTS: This study suggests that the etiology of IBC might be different of that of non-IBC.     

Can computerised tomography replace bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastases from breast cancer? A prospective study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether bone scans (BS) can be avoided if pelvis was included in CT thorax and abdomen to detect bony metastases from breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results of 77 pairs of CT (thorax, abdomen, and pelvis) and BS in newly diagnosed patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were compared prospectively for 12 months. Both scans were blindly assessed by experienced radiologists and discussed at multidisciplinary team meetings regarding the diagnosis of bone metastases. RESULTS: CT detected metastatic bone lesions in 43 (98%) of 44 patients with bone metastases. The remaining patient had a solitary, asymptomatic bony metastasis in shaft of femur. BS was positive in all patients with bone metastases. There were 11 cases of false positive findings on BS. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest routine BS of patients presenting with MBC is not required if CT (thorax, abdomen, and pelvis) is performed.     

Breast imaging and needle biopsy in women with clinically evident breast cancer: Does combined imaging change overall diagnostic sensitivity?

Combining mammography and ultrasound improves the sensitivity of imaging diagnosis. In the context of clinical masses, where percutaneous needle biopsy is routinely incorporated into the diagnostic pathway, little is known about the incremental gain in sensitivity where using single relative to combined imaging. We examined the sensitivity of imaging and needle biopsy combinations in a cohort of 1000 women with clinically evident (clinically presenting and/or clinically palpable) breast cancer. We report the distribution of age, tumour stage and node status, clinical findings, and individual test outcomes in all subjects. Sensitivity--true positive rate for cancer detection--of different test combinations (with the number of cases missed in 1000 subjects given in parentheses) is: mammography and ultrasound 97.9% (21); mammography with needle biopsy 99.5% (5); ultrasound with needle biopsy 99.5% (5); combined imaging with needle biopsy 99.6% (4). Using only one imaging test (irrespective of whether that is mammography or ultrasound) in combination with needle biopsy provides the same sensitivity, with an incremental gain in sensitivity of 0.1% where combined imaging is included into the diagnostic pathway. This is largely due to needle biopsy identifying most cancers missed on single imaging thus negating the effect of additional imaging on overall sensitivity.     

Is there a role for positron emission tomography imaging in the early evaluation of prostate cancer relapse?

The patient population with a rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) post-therapy with no evidence of disease on standard imaging studies currently represents the second largest group of prostate cancer patients. Little information is still available regarding the specificity and sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) tracers in the assessment of early biochemical recurrence. Ideally, PET imaging would allow one to accurately discriminate between local vs nodal vs distant relapse, thus enabling appropriate selection of patients for salvage local therapy. The vast majority of studies show a relatively poor yield of positive scans with PSA values < 4 ng ml(-1). So far, no tracer has been shown to be able to detect local recurrence within the clinically useful 1 ng ml(-1) PSA threshold, clearly limiting the use of PET imaging in the post-surgical setting. Preliminary evidence, however, suggests that 11C-choline PET may be useful in selecting out patients with early biochemical relapse (PSA < 2 ng ml(-1)) who have pelvic nodal oligometastasis potentially amenable to local treatment. The role of PET imaging in prostate cancer is gradually evolving but still remains within the experimental realm. Well-conducted studies comparing the merits of different tracers are needed.     

Surgery for breast cancer in the elderly--how relevant?

Studies suggest that elderly women receive less aggressive treatment, experience higher disease progression and mortality from breast cancer. We report on an experience of 256 consecutive cases of symptomatic breast cancer in a population of over 75 years of age. 142/256 patients underwent surgical intervention in the form of breast conserving surgery or mastectomy, 114/256 did not. Mean follow up was 6.4 years. Our results show a statistically significant association between surgery and survival (p = 0.05, CI 0.00046-0.19641) and a strong statistically significant association between surgery and disease progression/recurrence (p = 0.001, CI 0.08713-0.03145). Women treated conservatively are significantly less fit hence suffering high cancer unrelated mortality; as a consequence they suffer higher disease related progression and mortality. In our study surgical treatment with adjuvant endocrine and/or radiotherapy was associated with a statistically significant advantage in terms of disease related mortality and local disease control.     

Computed tomography of the coronary arteries: an alternative?

Multislice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive modality for the detection of coronary artery stenosis. Image quality is still limited when compared to conventional coronary angiography. However, CTCA has been demonstrated to be highly reliable to rule out coronary artery stenosis. Technological improvements and the combination of CTCA with other non-invasive modalities are expected to further increase diagnostic accuracy. Although CTCA has clearly left the research environment, the precise role of CTCA in the diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease needs further research.     

Does screen-detected breast cancer have better survival than symptomatic breast cancer?

OBJECTIVES: Evidence obtained from several randomized control trials suggest that mortality from breast cancer could be reduced by mammographic screening. However, a recent meta-analysis questioned the general acceptance that screening for breast cancer is beneficial. The purpose of the study was to analyze prospectively collected data from our unit and produce overall and comparative 5-year survival rates for screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancer. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on all patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between January 1993 and December 1994 (24 months), and monitored until the end of 1999, were collated and analyzed. Five-year survival was estimated and broken down by age at diagnosis, tumour size, grade and nodal status. The overall 5-year survival for women with screen-detected cancers was compared with that for women with symptomatically presenting cancers. RESULTS: Between January 1993 and December 1994, 308 patients with invasive breast cancer were referred to the unit (162 via the breast screening programme and 146 presenting symptomatically). The overall 5-year survival was 85.5% (confidence interval [CI], 80.8-89.1). Small tumour size, low grade and negative nodal status were associated with higher survival rates. Five-year survival of the screen-detected cancer patients (91.7%; CI, 85.8-95.2) was higher than that of patients presenting symptomatically (78.6%; CI, 70.6-84.6; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that patients with screen-detected breast cancer may have better survival compared to those with symptomatically detected breast cancer. The results support the argument in favour of a beneficial impact of breast screening programmes on patients' survival.     

Does obesity compromise survival in women with breast cancer?

Obesity, measured by high body mass index (BMI >30 kg/m2) is associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer but the effect of obesity on prognosis is not clear. A prospectively accrued and regularly validated database of 1579 patients with breast cancer treated in a district general hospital between 1963 and 1999 was analysed for clinical and pathological tumour characteristics including the family history, grade, tumour type, treatment and outcome. The risk factors and outcome of obese and non-obese patients were compared. Breast cancer in obese women was associated with significantly larger tumour size and worse Nottingham prognostic index. There was no statistically significant difference in overall and disease-free survival between obese and non-obese group. Hazard ratios (95% Cl) were 0.81 (0.62-1.06) and 0.80 (0.63-1.01), respectively. In the present study, obesity is not an indicator of worst prognosis of breast cancer.     

Is breast cancer in young Latinas a different disease?

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer appears to be more aggressive in young women (< or =35 years). Race/ethnicity may further influence prognosis. The purpose of this review is to determine whether breast cancer in young Latinas differs from that in other women. METHODS: Our institutional (1977-2000) and state (1988-2000) tumor registries were reviewed and breast cancer cases analyzed. Data are expressed as mean +/- SEM. RESULTS: At our institution, 56 (7%) of 748 breast cancer patients were < or =35 years old; 32 (57%) were Latina. Compared with non-Latinas, Latinas presented at a younger age (P <0.05) and had more stage III/IV disease (38% versus 29%; P >0.05) and bilaterality (22% versus 8%; P >0.05), and worse 5-year survival (63% versus 83%; P >0.05). Statewide data were consistent with our institutional data. CONCLUSIONS: Latinas comprise a disproportionate share of our young breast cancer population, and may suffer more aggressive disease than other young women. Young Latinas may benefit from more vigilant screening and should be considered for novel therapeutic protocols.     

Is breast conservation superior to mastectomy in early stage triple negative breast cancer?

PurposeCompare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) outcomes of breast conservative therapy (BCT) and mastectomy in a large cohort of patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), using a propensity score-based matching approach.MethodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to study the role of RT in early stage TNBC. Primary end points were OS and BCSS. Cox proportional hazard regression models and Kaplan-Meier plots were used to generate the desired outcomes. Propensity score matching was done to minimize bias.Results12,761 patients with T1-2N0M0 TNBC as their first malignancy were retrieved. Of these 7237 had lumpectomy with RT, and 5524 had mastectomy only. Age, race, marital status, tumor laterality, grade and stage, and receipt of chemotherapy were prognostic variables for OS and BCSS. Among 4848 matched subjects, the 5-year OS was significantly higher in patients with lumpectomy and RT (89%) compared to mastectomy alone (84.5%) (p-value <0.001). Similarly, BCSS was significantly higher in patients with lumpectomy and RT (93%) compared to mastectomy alone (91%) (p-value <0.001). On subgroup analysis, patients who are younger than 40 had similar survival outcomes after either mastectomy alone or lumpectomy with RT. However, those who are older than 60, have any grade or T stage had better survival outcomes with lumpectomy and RT.ConclusionsOverall, lumpectomy followed by RT is associated with better OS and BCSS compared to mastectomy in T1-2N0M0 TNBC patients. Further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy for specific patient subgroups.