Felodipine. A review of the pharmacology and therapeutic use of the extended release formulation in older patients.

Felodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist which may be administered once daily in an extended release (ER) formulation. As monotherapy in older patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, felodipine ER once daily provides effective control of blood pressure (BP). The drug has also been effective, either as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive medications, in comparisons with other antihypertensive agents, and does not adversely affect lipid profiles or, in patients with diabetes mellitus, glycaemic control. Results in patients with angina pectoris and congestive heart failure indicate a potential role for felodipine ER in these indications and data also suggest the drug reduces left ventricular hypertrophy. In addition, felodipine ER appears suitable for use in patients with concomitant respiratory disease, renal or hepatic dysfunction, cerebrovascular or peripheral ischaemic disease, or gout, making it particularly useful in the elderly who often have more than one significant clinical condition. Felodipine ER has generally been well tolerated by older patients in clinical trials, although further confirmation in the long term is desirable. Thus, felodipine ER effectively lowers BP in older patients with essential hypertension with the added convenience of once daily administration. It may be used as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents and is a practical advance in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly.     

Ramipril/felodipine extended-release fixed-dose combination: a review of its use in the management of essential hypertension

Ramipril/felodipine extended release (ER) [Triapin and Triapin Mite, Unimax] is a once-daily fixed-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor ramipril and the ER formulation of the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist felodipine. It is indicated in adult patients with essential hypertension whose blood pressure (BP) is inadequately controlled with ramipril or felodipine monotherapy. In this patient population, commercially available fixed-dose combinations (i.e. 2.5 mg/2.5 mg and 5 mg/5 mg) of ramipril and felodipine ER are more effective at controlling hypertension than the individual components used as monotherapy at the same dosages. Likewise, the 5 mg/5 mg combination is as effective as felodipine ER 10 mg, and more effective than ramipril 10 mg administered as monotherapy. The addition of low-dose ramipril plus felodipine ER (fixed-dose or combination of individual components) to the existing antihypertensive regimen also appears to provide adequate BP control and renal protection in hypertensive patients with non-diabetic chronic renal disease. In these patients, the low-dose combination of ramipril and felodipine ER was as effective as standard-dose felodipine ER, but more effective than standard-dose ramipril, in providing diastolic BP (DBP) control, and as effective as standard-dose ramipril, but more effective than standard-dose felodipine ER, in slowing the rate of regression of glomerular filtration. The ramipril/felodipine ER combination is as well tolerated as ramipril or felodipine ER monotherapy administered at the same dosages, and is better tolerated than felodipine ER monotherapy given at twice the dosage used in the combination. Overall, ramipril/felodipine ER appears to be an effective option for the treatment of adults with essential hypertension that is poorly controlled with monotherapy. In addition, a fixed, low-dose combination of ramipril/felodipine ER is a potential alternative to monotherapy for the initial management of essential hypertension.     

Felodipine ER formulation in the treatment of mild hypertension: efficacy and tolerability vs placebo.

1. Felodipine is a new calcium-antagonist dihydropyridine derivative with a high degree of selectivity for smooth muscle of arteriolar resistance vessels, as opposed to cardiac cells. 2. In this double-blind, cross-over study the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the new extended release (ER) formulation of felodipine 10 mg, once daily, in patients with mild essential hypertension was evaluated. After a 4-week single-blind placebo period 28 patients (15 males; mean age 48 +/- 12 years) were randomized to receive felodipine 10 mg ER once daily or placebo for 4 weeks and the alternative treatment for a further 4 weeks. Supine blood pressure and heart rate were measured in the out-patients department every 2 weeks, 22-24 h after the last drug administration. 3. Felodipine 10 mg ER induced a significant reduction in blood pressure in comparison with placebo (from 149 +/- 16/97 +/- 6 to 140 +/- 12/89 +/- 6 mm Hg). Heart rate remained unchanged. Seven patients dropped-out; five during felodipine ER administration and two during placebo. 4. A once daily dose of felodipine ER significantly reduces blood pressure in mild hypertensive patients 22-24 h after administration. It is well tolerated and the adverse events are related to its pharmacodynamic effects.     

Felodipine/metoprolol: a review of the fixed dose controlled release formulation in the management of essential hypertension

The main objective of fixed dose combination therapy for hypertension is to improve blood pressure (BP) control with lower, better tolerated dosages of 2 antihypertensives rather than higher dosages of a single agent. Felodipine and metoprolol lower BP via different, but complementary, mechanisms and controlled release formulations of these 2 drugs are available as a fixed dose combination, felodipine/metoprolol. In clinical trials in patients with hypertension, felodipine/metoprolol was significantly more effective than placebo and the respective monotherapies administered at the same dosages. Mean BP was reduced to < 155/90 mm Hg in patients treated with combination therapy and controlled in approximately 70% of patients. In one study that titrated dosages to effect, fewer felodipine/metoprolol than felodipine or metoprolol monotherapy recipients required dosage increases to achieve BP control (45 vs 60 and 67%, respectively). Data from double blind comparative studies show that the antihypertensive efficacy of felodipine/metoprolol 5 to 10/50 to 100 mg/day is significantly greater than that of enalapril monotherapy or captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide and equivalent to nifedipine/atenolol and amlodipine. In comparisons with enalapril, fewer felodipine/metoprolol than enalapril recipients required dosage titration to achieve BP control. Compared with amlodipine, felodipine/metoprolol significantly reduced mean 24-hour average BP (8.9/5.5 vs 14.4/9.5 mm Hg after 6 weeks; p < 0.001). Both treatments preserved diurnal rhythm. Long term follow-up studies show that the antihypertensive effect of felodipine/metoprolol occurs mostly during the first month of treatment with small additional decreases in BP being observed in the second and third months, and a relatively constant effect thereafter. According to a validated questionnaire, quality of life was relatively similar during 12 weeks treatment with felodipine/metoprolol, enalapril or placebo. In a retrospective pharmacoeconomic analysis conducted in Sweden, felodipine/metoprolol was more cost effective than enalapril as initial treatment for hypertension. Peripheral oedema, headache and flushing were the most commonly reported adverse events with felodipine/metoprolol and felodipine monotherapy, whereas dizziness, fatigue, headache and respiratory infection were more frequent with metoprolol monotherapy. Dose-dependent adverse events such as oedema may occur less often in patients taking lower dosages in combination than in those taking higher dosages of felodipine monotherapy. Thus, patients with hypertension treated with felodipine/metoprolol experience greater control of BP, with less need for dosage titration, than those treated with felodipine, metoprolol or enalapril monotherapy. Importantly this greater efficacy does not appear to be associated with a higher incidence of adverse events relative to monotherapy. Additionally, in short term studies felodipine/metoprolol had a similar (minimal) effect on QOL to enalapril monotherapy but was more cost effective.     

Felodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension

Felodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist which selectively relaxes vascular smooth muscle. By acting at peripheral arterioles, it lowers systemic vascular resistance and thereby produces substantial decreases in blood pressure and increases in cardiac output. Felodipine is indicated for the management of hypertension, and in patients with mild to moderate disease felodipine monotherapy markedly lowers blood pressure. It proved as effective as atenolol, and equivalent to hydrochlorothiazide, either with or without amiloride, in terms of antihypertensive activity. Comparative studies also demonstrated that once daily administration with an extended-release formulation provides equivalent antihypertensive efficacy to the same amount of drug administered twice daily as the standard tablets. As a second- or third-line treatment for patients with moderate to severe hypertension refractory to standard drug combinations, felodipine produced considerable reductions in blood pressure when added to beta-blockers and diuretics, either alone or in combination, in studies lasting up to 48 weeks. In comparative studies of multiple-drug treatments felodipine was found to have superior efficacy to hydralazine and prazosin, and was at least as effective as nifedipine, minoxidil and propranolol, when used with diuretics and/or beta-blockers. As an alternative to hydrochlorothiazide, in combination with beta-blockers, felodipine consistently controlled blood pressure in a greater percentage of patients and usually provided greater decreases in blood pressure. The main side effects with felodipine are ankle oedema, headache and flushing. Although the overall incidence of effects is quite high, they are usually mild in nature. Nevertheless, withdrawal due to side effects has been necessary in about 7% of patients overall. Thus, the efficacy of felodipine has been demonstrated in mild, moderate and severe hypertension. At the present time it seems particularly suitable as a second- or third-line treatment in refractory hypertension, but it also can be used as monotherapy for mild to moderate disease.     

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a low dose combination of ramipril and felodipine ER in mild to moderate essential hypertension

1. The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a low dose combination of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril (2.5 mg) and the extended release formulation of the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist felodipine (5 mg) were assessed in a double-blind, double dummy placebo controlled, randomised, crossover study in 20 patients (mean age 55.4 years; range 46-69) with uncomplicated mild to moderate hypertension (supine diastolic > 90 mmHg < 115 mmHg after 4 weeks of single-blind wash-out on placebo). The four randomised, double-blind, crossover study phases evaluated the response to 4 weeks of once daily treatment with placebo, monotherapy with each drug and the combination. Noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (Spacelabs 90207) was performed for 24 h at the end of each phase. 2. The mean 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (mmHg) was 147.9/92.0 following placebo, 141.3/87.8 following monotherapy with ramipril 2.5 mg, 136.8/85.8 following monotherapy with felodipine ER 5 mg and 131.1/82.6 following the combination of ramipril 2.5 mg and felodipine ER 5 mg. All active treatment phases significantly reduced mean 24 h ambulatory diastolic pressure by comparison with placebo. The antihypertensive efficacy of the combination was additive. 3. The coadministration of ramipril did not attenuate the incidence of headache attributable to felodipine ER.     

Antihypertensive efficacy of the calcium-antagonist felodipine in patients with persisting hypertension on beta-adrenoceptor blocker therapy. The Canadian Felodipine Study Group.

1. The antihypertensive efficacy of two different doses of the calcium antagonist felodipine was evaluated in patients with hypertension persisting despite beta-adrenoceptor blocker therapy. Following a single-blind placebo period of 4 weeks, patients were randomized to placebo (n = 36), felodipine 5 mg twice daily (n = 39) and felodipine 10 mg twice daily (n = 35) for another 4 weeks. beta-adrenoceptor blocker therapy remained unchanged throughout the study. 2. Effects on blood pressure (BP) were evaluated after the first dose and after chronic dosing at 2 h after dosing and the end of the dosing interval (12 h). 3. Felodipine decreased systolic and diastolic BP by 30-35/20-25 mm Hg at 2 h. These decreases were similar after acute and chronic treatment. Twelve hours after dosing, decreases of 15-20/10-15 mm Hg were observed compared to 10/5 mm Hg on placebo, and half of the patients still had a controlled BP (supine diastolic BP less than 90 mm Hg). BP responses were rather similar for both doses of felodipine at 2 and 12 h. 4. Multiple regression analysis showed that both initial BP level and plasma felodipine concentrations were significant predictors of the BP response to felodipine, but age was not. 5. Adverse effects attributed to felodipine were mainly related to vascular symptoms (primarily flushing and ankle swelling); these occurred in about 30% of patients, and were pronounced in three patients (4%). 6. Felodipine is therefore highly effective in lowering BP of hypertensive patients on chronic beta-adrenoceptor blocker therapy, with no evidence for a gradual lowering of the BP or for development of tolerance. Both initial BP level and plasma concentrations are better indicators of antihypertensive efficacy of this calcium antagonist than age.     

Felodipine extended release in mild to moderate hypertension

A multi-centre study was carried out to examine the antihypertensive effect and adverse event profile of felodipine in an extended-release (ER) formulation given once daily as monotherapy. Doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg felodipine ER were compared with placebo in 183 patients with mild or moderate hypertension. All antihypertensive medication was discontinued on entering a 4-week placebo run-in period. If, at the end of the run-in period, supine diastolic blood pressure was in the range greater than 95 less than 120 mmHg, patients were randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with felodipine, 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg, or placebo, to be taken once daily for 4 weeks. Supine and standing blood pressure, heart rate and body weight were measured every 2 weeks during the trial. Assessments were made 24 hours after intake of the study drug. Adverse events were recorded at each review. Over the 4-week treatment period, a dose-related decrease in supine diastolic blood pressure was observed, this reduction occurring already during the first 2 weeks of active treatment. In the placebo group and the felodipine 5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg groups, supine blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) decreased by 7/6 mmHg, 9/8 mmHg, 12/10 mmHg and 14/11 mmHg, respectively. Supine diastolic blood pressure reduction in the felodipine 10 mg group and both systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions in the 20 mg group were significantly greater than with placebo. Standing diastolic blood pressure reduction was significantly greater in all three dose groups on felodipine compared with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Control of blood pressure in hypertensive patients with felodipine extended release or nifedipine retard.

1. This multicentre hospital study compared the antihypertensive efficacy and the tolerability of once daily felodipine extended release (ER) with twice daily nifedipine retard (R) in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled on metoprolol monotherapy. 2. One hundred patients, aged 20-70 years, whose seated diastolic blood pressure was 100-115 mmHg after 4 to 6 weeks of metoprolol (200 mg day-1) monotherapy, were randomised, double-blind, to receive felodipine ER 10 mg once daily or nifedipine R 20 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. The dosage of felodipine or nifedipine was doubled if seated diastolic blood pressure exceeded 95 mmHg, 2 or 4 weeks after randomisation. Metoprolol 200 mg once daily was taken throughout the trial. 3. Fifty-one patients received felodipine ER and 49 nifedipine R; 46 and 45 respectively completed the 8 week trial. About half of patients on each treatment needed the higher dose. The baseline characteristics of the felodipine and nifedipine groups were generally well balanced. 4. Seated diastolic blood pressure was reduced by 17 mmHg for felodipine (24 h post-dose) and by 9 mmHg for nifedipine (12 h post-dose), a difference between treatments of 8 mmHg (95% confidence interval 5 to 12 mmHg, P less than 0.0001). The attained blood pressures at the end of the study (felodipine 90 +/- 10, mmHg, mean +/- s.d.; nifedipine 95 +/- 10) were also significantly different (95% confidence interval for the 5 mmHg difference, -9 to -1 mmHg, P less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Diuretics as a basis of antihypertensive therapy. An overview

Diuretics have been, except for during a few recent years, the most commonly used therapy for hypertension. Although use of these agents fell significantly in the early 1990s, since then it has begun to increase again. Their recent return to popularity reflects 3 major factors: (i) recognition of the effectiveness of much lower dosages than previously used, thereby providing good antihypertensive activity with fewer adverse effects; (ii) the excellent reductions in morbidity and mortality achieved by low dosage diuretic-based therapy in multiple randomised controlled trials in elderly patients with hypertension; and (iii) the increasing recognition that some diuretic-induced shrinkage of effective blood volume is essential for the adequate treatment of many, if not most, patients with hypertension. Therefore, diuretics will probably continue to be the basis for antihypertensive therapy, and the indapamide sustained release 1.5 mg formulation provides all the essential characteristics of diuretic therapy.     

Catecholamines and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system during treatment with felodipine ER or hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension.

The neurohumoral responses after 10 mg of felodipine extended release (ER), a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, and 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in 28 mild to moderate hypertensives. Antihypertensive drugs were gradually discontinued. Felodipine ER, 10 mg was given once daily for 2 weeks; after another washout period of 1 week, patients were switched to 25 mg of HCTZ once daily and vice versa. Blood pressure (BP) was measured at baseline, 2.5 h after medication, and after 2 weeks of treatment (24 h postdosing) using an oscillometric device. Felodipine ER and HCTZ both lowered BP effectively. However, felodipine ER was superior in reducing systolic and diastolic BP during the short term and medium term. Treatment with felodipine ER over 2 weeks increased sympathetic outflow as indicated by elevated plasma norepinephrine levels, whereas plasma epinephrine was mainly unaffected, as were plasma renin and aldosterone levels. On the other hand, 25 mg of HCTZ increased plasma renin and aldosterone, but left catecholamines unchanged. Despite persistent increased sympathetic activity, the reduction in BP in this study was more pronounced after felodipine ER as compared to HCTZ. The lack of a difference between heart rates under both medications after 2 weeks of treatment suggests a resetting of the baroreflex by felodipine ER and furthermore that the increased norepinephrine levels may not be clinically relevant, but demonstrate the maintained baroreflex activity. HCTZ, in doses as low as 25 mg, is still capable of stimulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.     

Ramipril. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in cardiovascular disorders

Ramipril is a long acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, which exhibits similar pharmacodynamic properties to captopril and enalapril. Like enalapril it is a prodrug, which is hydrolysed after absorption to form the active metabolite ramiprilat which has a long elimination half-life, permitting once daily administration. In hypertensive patients daily doses in the range 2.5 to 20 mg are usually effective in reducing high blood pressure and maintaining satisfactory control during long term treatment. Patients who do not respond adequately to monotherapy with ramipril usually respond with the addition of a diuretic such as hydrochlorothiazide or piretanide. Ramipril 5 to 10 mg once daily shows comparable antihypertensive efficacy to usual therapeutic dosages of captopril, enalapril and atenolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Preliminary data indicate that ramipril may be effective in indications such as severe essential hypertension and renal hypertension. It has also displayed beneficial effects in patients with moderate to severe congestive heart failure. Ramipril has been well tolerated and exhibits an adverse effect profile typical of ACE inhibitors as a class. In conclusion, ramipril will likely represent a useful alternative ACE inhibitor for use in patients with hypertension or congestive heart failure.     

Cilazapril. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in cardiovascular disease.

Cilazapril is an orally active angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor which lowers peripheral vascular resistance without affecting heart rate. Like enalapril and ramipril it is a prodrug, and is hydrolysed after absorption to cilazaprilat, which has a long terminal phase elimination half-life permitting once daily administration. Given once daily at doses between 2.5 and 5 mg, cilazapril reduces arterial blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential and renal hypertension. Patients who do not respond adequately to cilazapril monotherapy usually respond with the addition of a diuretic such as hydrochlorothiazide. Preliminary data suggest that cilazapril is of comparable antihypertensive efficacy to usual therapeutic dosages of hydrochlorothiazide, slow release propranolol, nitrendipine, captopril and enalapril. In small studies cilazapril has produced sustained beneficial haemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure. Cilazapril has been well tolerated and exhibits tolerability typical of ACE inhibitors as a class, including their lack of detrimental effect on glucose or lipid metabolism. Cilazapril should provide an effective alternative in the treatment of hypertension and, if preliminary data are confirmed, in congestive heart failure.     

Cross-over comparison of nifedipine Oros and felodipine extended release with blind 24 h ambulatory blood pressure assessments

1. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of nifedipine Oros and felodipine extended release (ER) in controlling 24 h ambulatory blood pressures (ABP) in hypertensive patients. 2. The study was a randomized cross-over design with a 2 week open placebo run-in phase and two observer-blind treatment periods. 3. Subjects were males and females, aged between 18 and 65 years, suffering from mild to moderate essential hypertension with a sitting mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) within the range of 95-114 mmHg. Twenty-three subjects were randomized to treatment; 15 patients completed the study. 4. Treatment intervention was 2 weeks of placebo followed by either 30 mg nifedipine OROS once daily or 5 mg felodipine ER once daily for 6 weeks, which was titrated up to 60 mg nifedipine OROS daily or 10 mg felodipine ER daily after 2 weeks of treatment on the lower doses if the DBP was > 90 mmHg. The main outcome measure was 24 h ABP after 6 weeks of active treatment, evaluated by an independent observer blinded as to treatment allocation. 5. Compared with placebo, mean (+/- SD) 24 h DBP was reduced by 6.2 +/- 6.8 and 5.2 +/- 5.1 mmHg after nifedipine and felodipine, respectively. The 24 h mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) fell by 11.8 +/- 10.9 and 10.1 +/- 8.2 mmHg for nifedipine and felodipine, respectively, compared with placebo. There were no significant differences between the two active treatments in the reduction of DBP or SBP during the 24 h period, daytime or night-time. 6. Similar antihypertensive effects are achieved with nifedipine Oros and felodipine ER when doses are individually titrated, with no significant differences between the two treatments.     

3种药物治疗轻、中度原发性高血压疗效观察

目的:观察非洛地平、美托洛尔、硝苯地平对轻、中度原发性高血压患者的治疗效果。方法:选取原发性轻、中度高血压患者95例,按用药方案分成非洛地平组(30例)、美托洛尔组(32例)、硝苯地平组(33例),3组均治疗6周,比较治疗后的血压下降水平和对靶器官保护作用,评价不良反应的发生率。结果:非洛地平组、美托洛尔组、硝苯地平组总有效率分别为90.0%、87.5%、81.8%,非洛地平和美托洛尔的降压效果均优于硝苯地平(P<0.05),不良反应发生率分别为10.0%、12.5%、15.2%;3组的平均心率均有一定程度降低,非洛地平组降低最明显(P<0.05),肌酐清除率均明显增加(P<0.05),左室心肌重量指数明显减少(P<0.05)。结论:非洛地平、美托洛尔是治疗轻、中度原发性高血压较为理想的药物。     

Lercanidipine: a review of its use in hypertension

Lercanidipine is a vasoselective dihydropyridine calcium antagonist which causes systemic vasodilation by blocking the influx of calcium ions through L-type calcium channels in cell membranes. It is a highly lipophilic drug and as such has a slower onset and longer duration of action than a number of other calcium antagonists. Preclinical evidence suggests that lercanidipine has antiatherogenic potential and it may also protect against end-organ damage. In well controlled clinical studies, once daily administration of lercanidipine 10 or 20mg effectively reduced blood pressure (BP) compared with placebo in patients with mild to moderate hypertension without affecting heart rate. Response rate (percentage of patients with diastolic BP < or =90mm Hg or reduced by > or =10mm Hg from baseline) ranged from 50 to 66% with lercanidipine 10 mg/day and up to 86% with lercanidipine 20 mg/day. The drug had a long duration of action: clinical measurements for diastolic BP yielded a trough/peak ratio of >0.8 for both lercanidipine dosages in 1 study. Comparative trials, either published in full or as abstracts, found lercanidipine 10mg once daily for > or =4 weeks to be at least as effective as atenolol 50mg once daily, candesartan cilexetil 16 mg/day, captopril 25mg twice daily, enalapril 20 mg/day, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg once daily, irbesartan 150 mg/day and slow release nifedipine 20mg twice daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In addition, lercanidipine 20 mg/day was as effective as amlodipine 10 mg/day. Lercanidipine is effective in the treatment of elderly patients (aged 60 to 85 years) with mild to moderate essential hypertension and in those with isolated systolic hypertension. In addition, monotherapy with lercanidipine 20 or 40 mg/day has shown efficacy in patients with severe hypertension, and add-on therapy helped control BP in a large proportion of patients with severe hypertension not responding sufficiently to beta-blockers, diuretics or ACE inhibitors. Unpublished data indicate that the drug reduces blood pressure in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, without adversely affecting glucose homeostasis. Lercanidipine was well tolerated in clinical trials, with most treatment-related adverse events typical of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, namely headache, flushing, dizziness and ankle oedema. CONCLUSIONS: Lercanidipine is an effective and well tolerated once daily antihypertensive agent in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In addition, the drug may reduce BP when used as monotherapy in patients with severe hypertension or when used adjunctively in patients with resistant hypertension. Importantly, lercanidipine appears to be at least as effective and well tolerated as other commonly used antihypertensive agents. The drug therefore represents a useful therapeutic option in the management of patients with hypertension and will be particularly useful in patients not responding to, or intolerant of, antihypertensive agents from other drug classes.     

A study of the acute pharmacodynamic interaction of ramipril and felodipine in normotensive subjects.

1. The possibility of an acute pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between the ACE inhibitor ramipril and the calcium antagonist felodipine was examined in 12 normotensive male volunteers. 2. Ramipril (5 mg) and felodipine ER (10 mg) were administered orally in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, Latin square design to fasting subjects. 3. There was no evidence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between agents. The concentration-time profiles remained unaltered by coadministration of both agents. 4. Plasma ACE inhibition by ramiprilat was unaffected by concurrent felodipine. The trend towards increased fractional sodium excretion after felodipine was not influenced by ramipril. Plasma renin activity, aldosterone and catecholamines remained unaltered. 5. Combination therapy produced a statistically significant fall in blood pressure supine and erect which was not evident with monotherapy. The reflex tachycardia associated with felodipine monotherapy was significantly attenuated by the coadministration of ramipril. 6. This study presents further evidence for the effective combination of ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists to lower blood pressure. The reflex tachycardia associated with calcium antagonist therapy can be significantly reduced by coadministration with sustained antihypertensive effect.     

非洛地平缓释片治疗社区高血压的疗效与依从性研究

目的:了解非洛地平缓释片治疗社区高血压的临床疗效和患者依从性,为社区高血压防治提供依据。方法:采用随机单盲将300名深圳市梅林社区管理的高血压患者分成2组,A组150例子尼群地平片20 mg,po,bid;B组150例予非洛地平缓释片5 mg,po,qd。疗程均为24周。每8周末测血压,并统计治疗依从性及药品不良反应。结果:治疗第8、16、24周末,与A组比较,B组血压下降幅度、治疗依从性差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:非洛地平缓释片治疗社区高血压患者疗效显著,治疗依从性好,可作为治疗社区高血压的首选药物。     

Terazosin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in essential hypertension

Terazosin is a post-synaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with a similar pharmacodynamic profile to prazosin. It differs from prazosin in having a longer duration of action, with an elimination half-life some 2 to 3 times that of prazosin, allowing the convenience of once daily administration. Moreover, its absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is more complete and predictable than that of prazosin which may facilitate dose titration. Terazosin therapy results in a significant reduction in blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, with little influence on heart rate. The drug is an effective antihypertensive when administered as monotherapy or in combination with a range of antihypertensive agents including beta-blockers, diuretics and combinations of the two. In the few patients with congestive heart failure studied, terazosin produced an increase in cardiac output with a reduction in ventricular filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance, but no studies have been performed to assess the therapeutic potential of terazosin in this indication. Reductions in total plasma cholesterol and low density plus very low density lipoprotein cholesterol fractions have been reported after terazosin therapy, while high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations have tended to increase. Should such beneficial changes be confirmed in long term clinical studies they would suggest a therapeutic advantage of terazosin over some other antihypertensive drugs, particularly diuretics, which have been reported to adversely affect the plasma lipid profile. The most common side effects associated with terazosin treatment are dizziness, headache, asthenia and nasal congestion, but these are usually mild and do not require treatment discontinuation. Terazosin is normally administered once daily, starting at a dose of 1 mg/day and gradually titrating upwards as the blood pressure stabilises at each new dose, until blood pressure is adequately controlled or to a maximum dose of 20mg daily. First-dose syncope occurs rarely after terazosin, and can largely be avoided by giving the first dose at bedtime. Thus, terazosin offers a useful alternative to the drugs currently available for the management of mild to moderate essential hypertension either as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs.     

国产和进口非洛地平缓释片治疗高血压病的疗效比较

目的 :比较国产与进口非洛地平缓释片治疗高血压病的疗效。方法 :国产非洛地平组 6 4例(男性 4 0例 ,女性 2 4例 ,年龄 6 7.8a±s1.3a) ,用国产非洛地平缓释片 5～ 10mg ,po ,qd× 8wk治疗 ;进口非洛地平组 6 4例 (男性 38例 ,女性 2 6例 ,年龄6 8.9a± 1.3a)用进口非洛地平缓释片 5～ 10mg ,po ,qd× 8wk治疗。结果 :国产和进口非洛地平缓释片降压总有效率分别为 94 %和 95 % ,2组疗效差别无显著意义 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,不良反应发生率国产组 16 % ,进口组 14% ,差别无显著意义 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :国产与进口非洛地平缓释片有相似的降压效果 ,两者使用均安全