Gender disparity in the practice of gastroenterology: the first 5 years of a career

BACKGROUND: Despite an unprecedented demand for gastroenterology services, the number of gastroenterology trainees has decreased over 50% since 1993. Women comprise nearly 50% of the U.S. medical school student population; yet only occupy 16% of gastroenterology fellowship positions. In order to recruit the best candidates to gastroenterology we must be able to demonstrate the attractiveness of a career in the field. A prospective study was performed to identify the career choices of graduates from gastroenterology fellowship programs using a prospective study model and to identify whether gender differences exist in the practice of gastroenterologists up to 5 yr after completion of training. METHODS: A survey gathering information on demographics, practice pattern, and income was mailed to two cohorts of gastroenterology fellows 3 and 5 yr after graduation. RESULTS: A total of 247 subjects completed the 3 yr and 220 subjects responded to the 5-yr survey. At 3 yr, men reported higher income (p < 0.001), worked longer hours per week (p < 0.002), and were more likely to be part owner of the practice (p= 0.027). Females reported fewer children (p < 0.007), lower board certification rates (p < 0. 002), worked for larger, multispecialty practices (p < 0.001), and practiced more internal medicine. These differences were still present at 5 yr into gastroenterology practice. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in practice type, earnings, board certification, professional standing, and alterations in family planning are noted between male and female gastroenterologists in the initial 5 yr of their practice.     

Is formal training necessary for capsule endoscopy?: The largest gastroenterology trainee study with controls

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the infrastructure to train gastroenterologists in capsule endoscopy. The level of capsule endoscopy exposure among trainees in the United Kingdom or Europe has also not been quantified. AIMS AND METHODS: To assess the ability of 10 gastroenterology trainees with endoscopy experience to interpret 10 capsule endoscopy videos against five medical students, with an expert in capsule endoscopy as the gold standard. Parameters assessed included gastric emptying time, small bowel transit and the diagnosis made. A questionnaire survey assessed the level of capsule endoscopy exposure among United Kingdom trainees. RESULTS: Trainees were better at determining the gastric emptying time (p=0.013) and more likely to record true positives compared to the students (p=0.037). They were also less likely to record false positives (p=0.005) and more likely to reach the correct diagnosis (p=0.001, OR 3.6, CI 1.8-7.4). Our survey found that, 65% of trainees had prior exposure to capsule endoscopy but only 13% had done capsule endoscopy reporting. Sixty seven percent felt capsule endoscopy should be incorporated into their training. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that prior endoscopic experience enables trainees to interpret capsule endoscopy more accurately than medical students. However, there is a demand for focussed training which would enable trainees to reliably interpret pathology on capsule endoscopy.     

Do gender disparities persist in gastroenterology after 10 years of practice?

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies confirm gender disparity in many aspects of the practice of medicine and surgery. Some data suggest the disparities diminish after 10 yr of practice. This study aims to examine gender discrepancies in income, social, and professional status of gastroenterologists after 10 yr of practice.
METHODS: Prospective, observational, cohort study of gastroenterologists incepted upon graduation from a U.S. GI fellowship program in 1993 and 1995. A 36-item questionnaire was sent to the cohort at 3, 5, and 10 yr after graduation from GI fellowship training. The following are the results of the final, 10th year survey.
RESULTS: A total of 168 men and 25 women (mean age 45.5 yr) responded. Men and women were equally likely to be board certified and married, however, women had fewer children. Men earned a mean annual gross income of $375,000 versus $245,000 for women ( P = 0.001). After adjusting for practice setting, work hours, practice-ownership, free endoscopy center practice, and vacation time, female gastroenterologists earned $82,000 (22%) less per year than their male colleagues (95% CI $34,000–130,000, P = 0.001). Women were more frequently in academic practice (38% vs 17%), but were less likely to hold the most advanced academic positions.
CONCLUSIONS: After 10 yr of practice, significant economic, professional, and social disparities persist between male and female gastroenterologists in this cohort. Women were more likely to practice in a setting with flexible work hours, a family leave provision, and in a practice with other women. Initiatives to equalize pay and ensure opportunities for professional advancement for women may diminish the significant practice disparities incurred by women in gastroenterology.     

Does gender affect career satisfaction and advancement in gastroenterology? Results of an AGA institute-sponsored survey

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Women comprise 19% of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) membership. We performed a prospective study to determine whether female gastroenterologists were less likely to achieve career advancement and satisfaction. METHODS: We administered an online survey to AGA members from 2004-2006. The survey contained questions regarding effects of gender on career advancement, satisfaction with career, promotional policies, and integration of family and career. RESULTS: A total of 457 individuals (response rate 9% after 2 major invitations) completed the survey, including 262 (57%) women (20% in private practice, 53% in academic careers, and 27% trainees) and 195 men (23% in private practice, 58% in academic careers, and 19% trainees). The male gastroenterologists were significantly older (P < .005) and in their careers for significantly more years (P = .002). There were no significant differences with respect to marital status, number of children, or number of hours worked between the genders. Men were more likely to achieve the rank of full professor (P = .035), and significantly more women reported that gender affected their career advancement (47% vs 9%; P < .001). Women in academic careers reported less satisfaction with their careers (P = .01) and perceived more difficulty in achieving promotion and tenure. Women were more likely to choose private practice careers because of part-time options (P = .025). Equal numbers of men and women in practice reported difficulty balancing work and family life. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more female than male gastroenterologists perceive that gender has affected their career advancement. Female academic gastroenterologists reported less overall career satisfaction and promotion than male academic gastroenterologists.     

Original research: UK-wide study of the opinions of gastroenterology trainees: COVID-19, Shape of Training and the future workforce

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted training. Gastroenterology higher specialty training is soon to be reduced from 5 years to 4. The British Society of Gastroenterology Trainees Section biennial survey aims to delineate the impact of COVID-19 on training and the opinions on changes to training.MethodsAn electronic survey allowing for anonymised responses at the point of completion was distributed to all gastroenterology trainees from September to November 2020.ResultsDuring the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, 71.0% of the respondents stated that more than 50% of their clinical time was mostly within general internal medicine. Trainees reported a significant impact on all aspects of their gastroenterology training due to lost training opportunities and increasing service commitments. During the first wave, 88.5% of the respondents reported no access to endoscopy training lists. Since this time, 66.2% of the respondents stated that their endoscopy training lists had restarted. This has resulted in fewer respondents achieving endoscopy accreditation. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused 42.2% of the respondents to consider extending their training to obtain the skills required to complete training. Furthermore, 10.0% of the respondents reported concerns of a delay to completion of training. The majority of respondents (84.2%) reported that they would not feel ready to be a consultant after 4 years of training.ConclusionsReductions in all aspects of gastroenterology training were reported. This is mirrored in anticipated concerns about completion of training in a shorter training programme as proposed in the new curriculum. Work is now required to ensure training is restored following the pandemic.     

Career choices of 135 cardiology trainees at Duke University Medical Center from 1970 to 1984

Alarm has been expressed at recently presented evidence showing that diminishing numbers of physicians are entering academic careers. The experience of the cardiology training program at a university medical center between 1970 and 1984 was reviewed to determine the career paths chosen by its trainees. During the study period, 135 physicians received training. Between 1970 and 1978 the percentage of trainees making academic medicine their initial career choice fluctuated considerably. Beginning in 1978, the percentage entering academic medicine steadily increased; in the most recent class, 8 of 9 trainees accepted academic faculty positions. Among 72 former trainees who joined an academic faculty after finishing training, approximately 7% per year left academic medicine for clinical practice. The median length of an academic career was 10 years. Individual institutions may be able to reverse the national trend of trainees making clinical practice their initial career choice. However, physicians who leave academic medicine for clinical practice may continue to deplete faculty ranks.     

The influences of gender and religiousness on Alzheimer disease caregivers' use of informal support and formal services

Objective. This study explored how male and female family caregivers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients differ in their use of formal services and informal support and how religiousness may affect such differences. Methods. Data were from a sample of 720 family caregivers of AD patients who participated in the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Heath (REACH I) study sites in Birmingham, Boston, Memphis, and Philadelphia. Results. Female caregivers were less likely to use in-home services than males (M = 0.83 vs. M = 1.06, p < .01) but reported more use of transportation services (21.6% vs. 12.7%, p < .01) and more use of informal support (M = 13.9 vs. M = 10.7, p < .01). Mediation tests suggested that three measures of religiousness helped explain the relationship between gender and use of formal services and informal support. Discussion. These findings highlight the necessity to assess AD caregivers' religiousness to better understand their circumstances.     

Faculty perceptions of gender discrimination and sexual harassment in academic medicine

BACKGROUND: Gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment are common in medical practice and may be even more prevalent in academic medicine. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment among medical school faculty and the associations of gender-based discrimination with number of publications, career satisfaction, and perceptions of career advancement. DESIGN: A self-administered mailed questionnaire of U.S. medical school faculty that covered a broad range of topics relating to academic life. SETTING: 24 randomly selected medical schools in the contiguous United States. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 3332 full-time faculty, stratified by specialty, graduation cohort, and sex. MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence of self-reported experiences of discrimination and harassment, number of peer-reviewed publications, career satisfaction, and perception of career advancement. RESULTS: Female faculty were more than 2.5 times more likely than male faculty to perceive gender-based discrimination in the academic environment (P < 0.001). Among women, rates of reported discrimination ranged from 47% for the youngest faculty to 70% for the oldest faculty. Women who reported experiencing negative gender bias had similar productivity but lower career satisfaction scores than did other women (P< 0.001). About half of female faculty but few male faculty experienced some form of sexual harassment. These experiences were similarly prevalent across the institutions in the sample and in all regions of the United States. Female faculty who reported being sexually harassed perceived gender-specific bias in the academic environment more often than did other women (80% compared with 61 %) and more often reported experiencing gender bias in professional advancement (72% compared with 47%). Publications, career satisfaction, and professional confidence were not affected by sexual harassment, and self-assessed career advancement was only marginally lower for female faculty who had experienced sexual harassment (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Despite substantial increases in the number of female faculty, reports of gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment remain common.     

Effect of evaluator and resident gender on the American board of internal medicine evaluation scores

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of resident and attending physician gender on the evaluation of residents in an internal medicine training program. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Large urban academic internal medicine residency program. PARTICIPANTS: During their first 2 years of training, 132 residents (85 men, 47 women) received a total of 974 evaluations from 255 attending physicians (203 men, 52 women) from 1989 to 1995. MEASUREMENTS: The primary measurements were the numerical portions of the American Board of Internal Medicine evaluation form. Separate analyses were performed for each of the nine evaluation dimensions graded on a scale of 1 to 9. The primary outcome was the difference in the average scores received by each resident from male versus female attending physicians. RESULTS: Compared with female trainees, male residents received significantly higher scores from male attending physicians than from female attending physicians in six of the nine dimensions: clinical judgment, history, procedures, relationships, medical care, and overall. Similar trends, not reaching conventional levels of statistical significance, were observed in the other three categories: medical knowledge, physical exam, and attitude. These differences ranged from 0.24 to 0.60 points, and were primarily due to higher grading of male residents by male attending physicians than by female attending physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In one academic training program, we found a significant interaction in the grading process between the gender of internal medicine residents and the gender of their attending evaluators. This study raises the possibility that subtle aspects of gender bias may exist in medical training programs.     

Subtle skills: Using objective structured clinical examinations to assess gastroenterology fellow performance in system based practice milestones

BACKGROUND System based practice(SBP) milestones require trainees to effectively navigate the larger health care system for optimal patient care. In gastroenterology training programs, the assessment of SBP is difficult due to high volume, high acuity inpatient care, as well as inconsistent direct supervision. Nevertheless,structured assessment is required for training programs. We hypothesized that objective structured clinical examination(OSCE) would be an effective tool for assessment of SBP.AIM To develop a novel method for SBP milestone assessment of gastroenterology fellows using the OSCE.METHODS For this observational study, we created 4 OSCE stations: Counseling an impaired colleague, handoff after overnight call, a feeding tube placement discussion, and giving feedback to a medical student on a progress note. Twentysix first year fellows from 7 programs participated. All fellows encountered identical case presentations. Checklists were completed by trained standardized patients who interacted with each fellow participant. A report with individual and composite scores was generated and forwarded to program directors to utilize in formative assessment. Fellows also received immediate feedback from a faculty observer and completed a post-session program evaluation survey.RESULTS Survey response rate was 100%. The average composite score across SBP milestones for all cases were 6.22(SBP1), 4.34(SBP2), 3.35(SBP3), and 6.42(SBP4)out of 9. The lowest composite score was in SBP 3, which asks fellows to advocate for cost effective care. This highest score was in patient care 2, which asks fellows to develop comprehensive management plans. Discrepancies were identified between the fellows' perceived performance in their self-assessments and Standardized Patient checklist evaluations for each case. Eighty-seven percent of fellows agreed that OSCEs are an important component of their clinical training,and 83% stated that the cases were similar to actual clinical encounters. All participating fellows stated that the immediate feedback was "very useful." One hundred percent of the fellows stated they would incorporate OSCE learning into their clinical practice.CONCLUSION OSCEs may be used for standardized evaluation of SBP milestones. Trainees scored lower on SBP milestones than other more concrete milestones. Training programs should consider OSCEs for assessment of SBP.     

The Impact of Health Care Reform on Gastroenterology Fellows: Are Training Programs Preparing Them for the Future?

Objective : Health care reform is dramatically changing the practice and delivery of medical care. The goal of this investigation was to examine gastroenterology trainees' outlook on the impact of health care reform on training programs. Methods : A 24-question survey was mailed in February 1996 to 780 GI fellows obtained from the comprehensive American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) database. Results : A total of 362 fellows responded (46%): 85% were male, 57% Caucasian, 75% married, and 86% were university-based. Ninety-six percent of fellows believed that health care reform is adversely affecting the quality of health care and 94.1% felt that it was adversely affecting fellowship training. Eighty-eight percent expressed concern over the impact of health care reform on practice opportunities. Only 9% of fellows reported that their training program had established a specific educational program addressing health care reform. where 83% of fellows felt that their program should do so. Conclusion : Gastroenterology fellows are concerned about the impact of health care reform on the quality of care and the quality of their fellowship training. Trainees believe that programs are not providing sufficient education to help them respond to the changes in health care.     

心血管内外科住院医师规范化培训学员满意度调查与分析

目的 调查分析遵义医学院附属医院心血管内外科住院医师规范化培训学员对规范化培训的相关方面内容的满意度情况。方法 选取我院2015级规范化培训学员为研究对象，采用现场发放调查问卷方法进行无记名调查分析。问卷调查内容包括:规范化培训的带教内容及教学方法、培训环境及设备安排、主管部门对培训工作的重视程度、住院医师培训与相关信息传达及时性、我院对规范化培训授课工作的重视程度、我院对临床工作能力及相关信息传达及时性、公共科目集中授课和专业课技能训练所安排的比例以及今后在那些方面还需要改进等。并了解学员各个方面的满意度。结果 对于此次问卷调查，发现大多学员还是喜欢这项培训工作的，对于我院老师的带教方法、带教内容、授课内容及其质量及主管部门的重视程度还是比较满意的。结论 大多数学员对我院住院医师规范化培训比较满意，获得学员认可的，可吸引更多学员加入我们的队伍，但是与国外相比，还有很大的差距。我们仍需要继续努力，不断为社会培养优秀医学人才。     

The rheumatology knowledge and skills of trainees in internal medicine and family practice

Our study examines the rheumatology knowledge and skills of trainees in internal medicine and family practice residency programs. Site visits were made to 15 programs in the eastern half of the United States. Eighty-one trainees participated in the study, 53 in internal medicine and 28 in family practice. Each completed a 50-item rheumatology quiz and performed a clinical assessment of a trained patient evaluator. Trainees in internal medicine had quiz and clinical assessment scores of 52.4% and 72.9%, respectively, while scores for family practice trainees were 43.4% and 61.6% (p less than 0.004 for both). Regression analysis showed that having had a rheumatology elective had a significant effect on knowledge and skills. Trainees in family practice programs were 3 times less likely than internal medicine trainees to have taken a rheumatology elective. Family practice trainee scores in our study were comparable to scores previously documented in 4th year medical students. These results confirm the importance of a specific rheumatology experience for the development of rheumatology knowledge and skills in internal medicine and family practice trainees, and suggest that the rheumatology content of these training programs needs to be enhanced.     

Employment prospects and trends for gastroenterology trainees in Canada: A nationwide survey

BACKGROUND:

Many gastroenterology (GI) trainees face a variety of barriers to stable employment and are finding it increasingly difficult to secure employment in their chosen field.

OBJECTIVE:

To elucidate factors that contribute to the burden of unemployment and underemployment, and to examine solutions that may remedy this growing problem in the field of GI.

METHODS:

A nationwide survey of current, incoming and recently graduated individuals of GI training programs in Canada was conducted. Trainees in pediatric GI programs and those enrolled in sub-specialty programs within GI were also included.

RESULTS:

The response rate was 62%, with 93% of respondents enrolled in an adult GI training program. Many (73%) respondents planned to pursue further subspecialty training and the majority (53%) reported concerns regarding job security after graduation as contributory factors. Only 35% of respondents were confident that they would secure employment within six months of completing their training. Regarding barriers to employment, the most cited perceived reasons were lack of funding (both from hospitals and provincial governments) and senior physicians who continue to practice beyond retirement years. Sixty-nine per cent perceived a greater need for career guidance and 49% believed there were too many GI trainees relative to the current job market in their area. Most residents had a contingency plan if they remained unemployed >18 months, which often included moving to another province or to the United States.

CONCLUSION:

GI trainees throughout Canada reported substantial concerns about securing employment, citing national retirement trends and lack of funding as primary barriers to employment. Although these issues are not easily modifiable, certain problems should be targeted including optimizing training quotas, tailoring career guidance to the needs of the population, and emphasizing credentialing and quality control in endoscopy.     

Is there still a gender gap in cystic fibrosis?

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown that female patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have a significantly poorer prognosis than male patients. Such studies investigating gender-related differences have generally combined data from several centers. The aim of this study was to determine whether with modern aggressive treatment of CF this is still true when care is standardized within a single center. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of annual assessment data constructing two cross-sectional studies for the year 1993 (56 female patients, 49 male patients) and 2002 (115 female patients, 94 male patients) and two longitudinal studies, each lasting 5 years, starting in 1993 (21 female patients, 19 male patients) and 1998 (40 female patients, 41 male patients). Outcome measures included mortality, height, and weight SD scores (z scores), and percent predicted for lung function. RESULTS: In neither cross-sectional study were there significant differences between the sexes for median FEV(1) percent predicted (1993: female patients, 86%; male patients, 84%; 2002: female patients, 93%; male patients, 92%). Female height and weight z scores were at least as good as those of male scores. In the longitudinal studies, there were no clear trends toward declining lung function or growth, but the overall FEV1 percent predicted appeared to be better in female patients than male patients for both cohorts. This was statistically significant for the 1998 cohort (female median FEV1, 91.5% [range, 28 to 134%]; male median FEV1, 84.8% [range, 32 to 145%]; p < 0.05). Female nutritional status was at least as good as male nutritional status, other than the 1998 weight z scores (-0.54 vs -0.21, respectively; p < 0.02). Since 1993, there have been 13 deaths altogether (7 female patients). CONCLUSION: During childhood and adolescence, the lung function and nutrition of CF patients should be at least as good in female patients as in male patients. Individual clinic practice should be reviewed if a gender gap persists.     

The Perception of Gastroenterology Fellows towards the Relationship between Hand Size and Endoscopic Training

Some endoscopic trainees find it difficult to manipulate an endoscope's controls, possibly due to small hand size. To assess this, a survey was mailed to all gastroenterology fellows in the US. Two hundred twenty-seven of 1,295 (17.5%) fellows responded. Median surgical glove size was 7.5. Ninety-three respondents (41.0%) considered their hand too small for a standard endoscope's handle; 176 (78.2%) felt that hand size affects the ability to learn endoscopy. Seventy-seven (34.2%) would use smaller handled endoscopes if available. Of the 38 respondents with glove sizes < or =6.5, 37 (97.4%) were female. These respondents were more likely to consider their hand too small (P < 0.001), want to use smaller handled endoscopes (P < 0.001), and feel that training programs should offer them (P = 0.009). These results suggest that a significant number of trainees, especially women, perceive that their hands are too small for standard endoscopes and believe that hand size plays a role in learning and performing endoscopy.     

Diversity among transplant surgery fellowship program directors: a call to action

BackgroundThe diversity among general surgery residency, HPB and other fellowship program directors has been previously analyzed. However, the diversity in abdominal transplant surgery fellowship program directors remains unknown.MethodsAbdominal transplant fellowship programs and the corresponding program directors were identified from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons website. Demographic and training information for the members was compiled through internet searches and analyzed.Results72 program directors were included. 83.33% were male. 63.9% were non-Hispanic White, 25% were Asian, along with 5.56% Hispanic and Black each. Male program directors were more likely to be Associate Professor (p = 0.041), while females were more likely to be Assistant Professor (p = 0.021). 66% of female program directors were non-Hispanic White.ConclusionTransplant surgery fellowship programs are primarily led by male and non-Hispanic White surgeons. Female representation as leaders is on par with their membership in the transplant surgery workforce. There is a deficiency of both male and female underrepresented minorities in program director positions.     

Changhai advanced endoscopy courses for ERCP (CHANCE) training program: A short-term training model in China

BackgroundThere is huge shortage of ERCP practitioners (ERCPists) in China, and ERCP training is urgently needed. ChangHai Advanced eNdoscopy Courses for ERCP (CHANCE) is a 4-month program for ERCP training since 2004. This study evaluated the efficiency of this short-term training model, and reported on the ERCP careers of the trainees following completion of the CHANCE program.MethodsThis study was a retrospective investigation included all the CHANCE trainees from Jan 2004 to Dec 2014. Questionnaires were sent to all trainees. The career competence percentage, ERCP careers and predictive factors of career competence were investigated and analyzed.ResultsA total of 413 trainees participated in the CHANCE program over 11 years covered by the survey and 258 questionnaires were valid for the study. The mean (SD) age of the trainees was 35.36 (4.17), and the male to female ratio was 4.4:1. The average follow-up time was 7.77 (3.44) years. A total of 173 (67.1%) trainees had achieved career competence. In terms of ERCP careers, the mean annual ERCP volume was 120.60 (96.67), with a complication percentage of 8.2%. Hospital qualification, compliance with follow-up learning guidance, participating academic activity, and practitioner type were identified predictive factors of career competence.ConclusionsAs a short-term training program, the CHANCE achieved an acceptable career competence percentage, providing endoscopists more chances to learn ERCP and giving them appropriate training guidance for career competence. This training mode is worth promoting in developing countries with shortage of ERCPists.     

Younger age potentiates post myocardial infarction survival disadvantage of women

BACKGROUND: Female patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) exhibit higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates compared to male patients. However, contradictory evidence exists on whether this survival disadvantage disappears after adjustment for age and other prognostic factors. This study, based on a countrywide survey of consecutive unselected patients with acute MI, examined whether female gender is an independent predictor of poor short-term outcome and less intensive in-hospital treatment. METHODS: Data on a total of 7433 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age was 64+/-13 years and the proportion of females in this population was 23%. Univariate and multivariate predictors of in-hospital mortality in female patients were estimated. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates of women were significantly higher compared to men (17.7 vs. 8.6, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, female gender was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in the total population [relative risk (RR)=1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.02-1.64, p=0.036]. The RR of women for in-hospital death was exaggerated among younger patients, aged <55 years (RR=3.84, 95% CI=1.07-13.74, p=0.039). Female gender was also independently and inversely associated with administration of thrombolytic treatment (RR=0.724, 95% CI=0.630-0.831, p=<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although female gender is an independent predictor of higher post-MI in-hospital mortality with a pronounced effect among younger patients, women are less likely to receive thrombolysis than men. Based on the results from this countrywide study, we should consider women, especially of younger age, as patients at particular high risk, who contrary to common practice, deserve more intensive and aggressive in-hospital treatment.