William Stewart Halsted: Father of American Modern Surgery

Peritoneal dialysis is an established alternative method for the management of patients with end-stage renal disease. Recently, laparoscopy has been utilized in assisting the insertion of catheters under direct vision. The efficacy of the laparoscopic approach for patients with a history of abdominal surgery remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate laparoscopy in the placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters for selected patients with previous abdominal operation. Laparoscopic assisted placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters was performed in 20 patients, who were carefully selected preoperatively and who also underwent previous abdominal operation between April 1999 and July 2001. Previous abdominal operation included appendectomy, ovarian resection, hysterectomy, cesarean section, open cholecystectomy, segmental resection of the small intestine, and truncal vagotomy with pyloroplasty. The procedure was performed using two 10-mm and one 5-mm abdominal trocar. All of the patients tolerated this procedure without significant surgical complications. However, 3 patients developed temporary hemoperitoneum, and 1 patient developed dialysate leakage. The overall success rate of catheter function (> 30 days after laparoscopy) was 90%, except in 2 cases where the catheter functioned poorly due to severe intra-abdominal adhesions. Simultaneous laparoscopic adhesiolysis was successfully performed in 5 cases. Laparoscopic implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters appears to be a straightforward procedure, even for patients with previous abdominal operation. We believe that this technique may extend the application of peritoneal dialysis treatment in patients with previous abdominal surgery after discreet evaluation preoperatively.     

The adequacy of laparoscopy for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis procedures

The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of diagnostic/therapeutic laparoscopy in the management of peritoneal Tenchoff catheter placement in end-stage renal disease patients who had previous abdominal surgery and malfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters. From 1999 to 2004, 16 videolaparoscopic procedures were performed in 16 patients who had previous laparotomies. Laparoscopy was performed before peritoneal catheter placement in seven (group 1) and in 9 patients with peritoneal dialysis catheters in place, laparoscopy was performed for the management of catheter dysfunction (group 2). All laparoscopic procedures were performed under general anesthesia. The mean follow-up was 31.5 (range, 11 to 60) months. In group 1, six patients (85.7%), and in group 2, seven patients (77.7%) are still on peritoneal dialysis. Laparoscopy resulted in the placement/salvage of peritoneal dialysis catheter dysfunction. Placement of catheter was accomplished in patients who would have been previously designated as unsuitable candidates. Laparoscopy is a useful tool in every step of a peritoneal dialysis program.     

Laparoscopic omentectomy for salvage of peritoneal dialysis catheters

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Maintaining long-term peritoneal catheter function for peritoneal dialysis is commonly threatened by problems with catheter obstruction. Multiple methods have been used to salvage nonfunctioning catheters, including omentopexy, catheter repositioning, and omentectomy. We report on our experience with a laparoscopic method of omentectomy and catheter fixation for salvage of nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters underwent 16 laparoscopic procedures with the intent to restore function. Clinically, all patients presented with outflow obstruction. At initial presentation, all patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and a definitive procedure. In 12 patients, catheters were enveloped by omentum, and we performed laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation to the anterior pelvic wall. In one patient, we identified a broken catheter and performed a laparoscopic omentectomy at the time of catheter replacement. One 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars were utilized. Omentectomy was performed using either endo-GIA stapled resection (2 patients) or the Harmonic Scalpel (11 patients). All trocar incisions (including the 5-mm site) were closed with a suture-passing (Carter-Thomason) device to provide water-tight closure in anticipation of immediate return to peritoneal dialysis. Patients were followed postoperatively for an average of 17 months (range 4-35 months). RESULTS: All patients' catheter function was restored intraoperatively with laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation. Eight catheters remained functioning following omentectomy without further intervention. Five patients (38%) experienced repeat catheter malfunction and underwent laparoscopic exploration. Of these, three catheters (60%) were restored to function with laparoscopic manipulation alone. Three catheters were found encased in extensive adhesions. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was successful in one patient and unsuccessful in one patient, who converted to hemodialysis. One patient failed laparoscopic salvage and required open laparotomy and fibrin clot removal to restore catheter function. One catheter was found to be obstructed within a pericolic hematoma. One catheter was found within residual omentum at the hepatic flexure. Both of these catheters were freed laparoscopically and continued to function at 12 and 16 months' follow-up. Complications included one episode of peritonitis, one case of postoperative ileus, and one trocar site hernia necessitating repair. The nephrologists were instructed that they could begin peritoneal dialysis on postoperative day 1. Seven patients resumed peritoneal dialysis without leak from trocar sites. The remaining patients received temporary hemodialysis through a central venous catheter and returned to peritoneal dialysis at the discretion of their nephrologists. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic omentectomy with catheter fixation is a minimally invasive means of salvaging peritoneal dialysis catheters with outflow obstruction. Complications are few, and closure of laparoscopic incisions in water-tight fashion allows rapid return to peritoneal dialysis.     

Secure placement of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters under laparoscopic assistance

Laparoscopic surgical procedures were performed in 18 patients with end-stage renal disease for the placement of a Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter. Among them, 6 patients had received previous lower abdominal surgical treatment and 3 patients underwent laparoscopic rescue of dysfunctional Tenckhoff catheters. The operating time was between 40 and 80 minutes (median, 50 minutes). After a median follow-up period of 11 months, the short-term results revealed that no significant morbidity was associated with this procedure, and all catheters except two functioned well postoperatively. One of the catheters was not functional because of the patient's death, and the other one was removed because of persistent peritonitis. Laparoscopic secure placement of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters appears to be a simple, safe, and viable procedure, even in patients with previous lower-abdominal operations. The same technique can be used to rescue dysfunctional catheters that are displaced or obstructed by adhesion and omental wrapping, thus increasing catheter longevity.     

Laparoscopic placement of the Tenckhoff catheter for peritoneal dialysis

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters can be inserted by open laparotomy as well as by laparoscopy. A prospective randomized study was scheduled to investigate the results of the laparoscopic versus open laparotomy technique for placement of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheters. Fifty patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups of 25 patients each. Group A underwent continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter placement via the open laparotomy technique. In 22 patients, catheters were inserted via midline incision, and in 3 patients with histories of previous catheterization, a paramedian incision was used. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was started 24 to 48 hours later. Group B underwent laparoscopic placement of the catheter with fixation into the pelvis and suture closure of the port wounds. In 21 patients, this catheter placement was the first such placement, and in 4 patients, a previous catheter had been inserted by the open technique and removed for dysfunction. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was started at the end of the procedure. The mean operative time was 22 minutes in group A and 29 minutes in group B (P < 0.001). Fluid leakage was observed in eight patients in group A, but in no patients in group B (P < 0.005). Peritonitis occurred in five patients in group A and in three patients in group B (P > 0.1). Tip migration occurred in five patients in group A and no patients in group B (P < 0.005). In group B, two patients underwent a simultaneous cholecystectomy and one underwent incisional hernia repair. Laparoscopic placement of a Tenckhoff catheter leads to better function than does the open procedure; it allows immediate start of dialysis without fluid leakage and permits simultaneous performance of other laparoscopic procedures.     

Laparoscopic Techniques Enable Peritoneal Dialysis in the Difficult Abdomen

Background and Objectives:

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis has become an increasingly popular modality of renal replacement therapy. Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters may help overcome previous barriers to peritoneal dialysis, such as previous abdominal surgical procedures or the presence of hernias, without incurring substantially greater risks.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective review of 120 consecutive patients who underwent attempted laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement between July 2009 and June 2014 by a single surgeon. Patient and catheter characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients with and without complications, as well as between patients with a history of major abdominal surgery and those without such a history.

Results:

Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement was aborted in 4 patients because of an inability to safely achieve sufficient access to the abdominal cavity through dissection; these patients were excluded from subsequent analysis. The mean follow-up period was 18.8 ± 12.9 months. Fifty-five patients had a history of major abdominal surgery compared with 61 without such a history. No significant difference was observed with respect to age, race, sex, or body mass index between groups. Notably, more adjunctive procedures were required in patients with previous abdominal surgery, including adhesiolysis (60.0% vs 4.9%, P < .0001) and hernia repair (12.7% vs 1.6%, P = .026). Postoperative catheter complications were not significantly different between patients with and patients without a history of abdominal surgery (29.1% vs 32.8%, P = .667). Both unassisted (56.8% vs 65.0%, P = .397) and overall (72.7% vs 76.7%, P = .647) 1-year catheter survival rates were similar between patients with and patients without previous surgery, and the overall 1-year survival rate improved to 83.9% on exclusion of patients who stopped peritoneal dialysis for nonsurgical reasons.

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement offers a chance to establish peritoneal dialysis access in patients traditionally viewed as noncandidates for this modality. Despite the potential risks incurred because of additional procedures at the time of catheter placement in these complicated cases, these patients can achieve good long-term peritoneal dialysis access with an aggressive surgical approach.     

大网膜部分切除在腹腔镜腹膜透析管置入术的应用价值

目的探讨大网膜部分切除术在慢性肾脏病5期患者腹膜透析管置入术中的应用价值。方法选择郑州大学第一附属医院腹腔镜外科于2017-01—2019-08间收治的268例慢性肾脏病5期患者,其中190例行常规腹腔镜下腹膜透析管植入术(常规腹腔镜组)、78例行腹腔镜下腹膜透析管置入并大网膜部分切除术(大网膜切除组)。对2组患者的临床资料进行比较分析。结果2组患者的年龄、性别、术前血红蛋白、术前肌酐值等一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。268例手术均获成功,大网膜切除组手术时间长于常规腹腔镜组,手术费用多于常规腹腔镜组;常规腹腔镜组堵管10例,大网膜切除组无堵管病例。差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下腹膜透析管置入并大网膜部分切除术,对预防术后大网膜包裹腹膜透析管效果良好,具有临床应用价值。     

Laparoscopic placement and revision of peritoneal dialysis catheters.

Chronic peritoneal dialysis is an option for many patients with end stage renal disease. Laparoscopy offers an alternative approach in the management of dialysis patients. Over an 18-month period, laparoscopy was used for placement or revision of seven peritoneal dialysis catheters. All were placed in patients with end stage renal disease for chronic dialysis. Two catheters were initially placed using the laparoscope, and in five other patients, the position of the catheter was revised. Of the two patients who had their catheters placed initially, one patient had a previous lower mid-line incision and underwent laparoscopic placement of a catheter and lysis of pelvic adhesions. The second patient had hepatitis C and chronically elevated liver function tests. He underwent laparoscopic placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter and liver biopsy. Five patients had laparoscopic revision for non-functional catheters. Four were found to have omental adhesions surrounding the catheter. Three patients were found to have a fibrin clot within the catheter, and in one patient the small bowel was adhered to the catheter. All seven patients had general endotracheal anesthesia. There were no operative or anesthetic complications. The average operative time was 56 minutes. Four patients had their procedure in an ambulatory setting and were discharged home the same day. One patient was admitted for 23-hour observation, and two patients had their procedure while in the hospital for other reasons. In follow-up, there was one early failure at two weeks, which required removal of the catheter for infection. One catheter was removed at the time of a combined kidney/pancreas transplant eight months after revision. The other five catheters are still functional with an average follow-up of ten months. These results suggest that laparoscopy is another method for placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters and more importantly for revision in patients with nonfunctional catheters secondary to adhesions. It also provides an opportunity to evaluate the abdomen and perform concomitant procedures.     

Laparoscopic management of Tenchkoff catheters in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

We describe a one-port laparoscopic technique for assisting in Tenchkoff catheter placement and salvaging obstructed ones in patients requiring continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). This unique technique enables diagnostic laparoscopy, adhesiolysis, repositioning of catheters, and omentectomy to be performed without laparotomy. Six patients were treated. Only one 10-mm port was required, using an operating laparoscope and an instrument introduced through the working channel of the laparoscope. Adhesiolysis was performed under laparoscopic vision; omentectomy and flushing of blocked catheters were carried out extracorporeally. The catheters were then repositioned to the pelvic cavity under laparoscopic vision. All patients were followed up for 6–10 months. No mechanical problem was noticed. Our one-port laparoscopic technique is a simple and effective method for treating patients who have mechanical problems with their peritoneal dialysis catheters. Received: 14 January 1997/Accepted: 14 April 1997     

Laparoscopic omental fixation technique versus open surgical placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters

Background: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is an effective form of treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Open insertion of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters is the standard surgical technique, but it is associated with a relatively high incidence of catheter outflow obstruction and dialysis leak. Omental wrapping is the most common cause of mechanical problems. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of the laparoscopic omental fixation technique to prevent the obstruction caused by omental wrapping and also to compare this laparoscopic technique with open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion with respect to postoperative discomfort, complication rates, and catheter survival. Methods: Between March 1998 and October 2001, 42 double-cuff, curled-end CAPD catheters were placed in 42 patients. The outcomes of the 21 patients in whom the PD catheters were placed laparoscopically with omental fixation technique were compared with those of the 21 patients in whom the catheters were placed with open surgical technique. Recorded data included patient demographics, catheter implantation method, early and late complications, catheter survival, and catheter outcome. Results: Early peritonitis episodes occurred in 8 of 21 patients (38.0%) in the open surgical group (OSG) versus 2 of 21 patients (9.5%) in the laparoscopic omental fixation group (LOFG) (p < 0.05); late peritonitis episodes occurred in 3 of 21 patients (14.2%) in the OSG versus 1 of 21 patients (4.7%) in the LOFG (p < 0.05). Early exit site infection occurred in 8 of 21 patients (38.0%) in the OSG versus 4 of 21 patients (19.0%) in the LOFG (p < 0.05), with many catheter-related problems in the conventional surgical group. There was no outflow obstruction in the LOFG. The conventional procedure was faster than the laparoscopic omental fixation technique. Analgesic requirements and hospital stay were less in the laparoscopic group. Laparoscopic surgery also enabled diagnosis of intraabdominal pathologies and treatment of the accompanying surgical problems during the same operation. Occult inguinal hernia was diagnosed in 2 patients, inguinal hernioplasty was performed in 4 patients, adhesiolysis was performed in 8 patients who had previous abdominal surgery, and liver biopsy was taken in 2 patients. Ovarian cystectomy was performed in another patient during laparoscopic CAPD catheter placement. Conclusion: The laparoscopic omental fixation technique (described by Öünç and published in 1999) is a highly effective and successful method for preventing obstruction due to omental wrapping with a better catheter survival. Laparoscopic surgery also allows the diagnosis and treatment of the accompanying surgical pathologies during the same operation.     

A novel minimally invasive technique for insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter

The placement of a continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) catheter by conventional open surgical or trocar technique may cause a number of complications such as infection, hemorrhage, leakage, incisional hernia, and visceral organ perforation. Most complications are related to open surgery or insertion of the catheter with the guidewire without direct visualization. Insertion of the catheter laparoscopically under direct visualization has been previously described. The authors who described this technique used two or three ports for the camera and instruments. In this study we describe a laparoscopic technique for insertion of the peritoneal dialysis catheter under direct visualization with use of one-camera port and an accessory 2-mm umbilical incision. This prospective study was performed with the approval of the ethics committee of the Gazi University Hospital, in Ankara, Turkey. There were a total of eight patients: five males and three females, with an average age of 34.3 years (range, 11-54), who underwent laparoscopic CAPD insertion between 1997 and 2000. The catheter was inserted into the abdominal cavity 2 cm below the umbilicus. The subcutaneous tunnel was made with the assistance of a specially designed L-shaped trocar. All patients did well after the operation and had excellent cosmetic results. There was one leak in the early postoperative period, which was treated conservatively. The average operating time was 34.7 minutes (range, 25-45 minutes). The laparoscopic approach for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion, for management of transmigrated CAPD catheters, and to resolve omental occlusions should be considered as an alternative to open surgery, especially for patients who have peritoneal adhesions secondary to a history of abdominal surgeries or recurrent peritonitis.     

Primary laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters in children and young adults

Background: Primary placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters in children often requires suturing of the catheter into the pelvis. We describe our experience with a gasless laparoscopy technique in children and young adults. Methods: During an 18-month period, 12 patients (mean age, 14 years) underwent primary laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters. A single umbilical port was used for abdominal wall elevation, telescope, and catheter. A needleholder was introduced via an accessory port at the future catheter exit site or through the umbilical port. Omentectomy was performed through the umbilical incision. The catheter was tunneled to the lateral abdominal wall. Follow-up data (≥15 months) included time to initiation of dialysis, hospitalization, and outcome. End points were cure, transplantation, or death. Results: Diet was started on the day of surgery and dialysis on the following day. Four patients had seven complications, including leakage and entanglement of the catheter in tubal fimbriae. Long-term revision-free catheter survival was 67% at 24 months. Conclusions: This minimal access technique for primary placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters includes securing of the catheter tip in a dependent location and omentectomy. It allows nearly immediate use of the catheter, leads to a minimal hospital stay, and has acceptable long-term patency. Received: 24 December 1998/Accepted: 3 March 1999     

Selected best demonstrated practices in peritoneal dialysis access

Many burdensome interventions that adversely affect the utilization of peritoneal dialysis as renal replacement therapy and patient satisfaction with this treatment modality can be avoided by early peritoneal access placement with embedded catheters, implantation techniques that preempt common catheter complications, and the use of access devices that provide flexibility in exit site location. Catheter embedding consists of subcutaneously burying the external limb of the catheter tubing at the time of the insertion procedure. Interval exteriorization of the catheter is performed when dialysis is needed. Earlier commitment by patients to peritoneal dialysis can be achieved by elimination of catheter maintenance until dialysis is necessary. Catheter embedding is a practical strategy to avoid temporary hemodialysis with vascular catheters and reduces stress on operating room access by allowing more efficient scheduling as non-urgent procedures. Laparoscopic catheter placement enables proactive techniques not available to other conventional insertion methods. These techniques include rectus sheath tunneling to prevent catheter tip migration, selective prophylactic omentopexy to prevent omental entrapment, selective resection of epiploic appendages to prevent catheter obstruction, adhesiolysis to eliminate compartmentalization, and diagnosis and simultaneous repair of previously undiagnosed abdominal wall hernias. Both standard and extended 2-piece catheter systems are necessary to customize the peritoneal access to a variety of body configurations. Catheters should be able to produce lower abdominal, mid-abdominal, upper abdominal, and upper chest exit site locations that facilitate management by the patient without sacrificing deep pelvic position of the catheter tip or resulting in excessive tubing stress during passage through the abdominal wall.     

COMPARATIVE EXPERIENCE OF A SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC CHRONIC AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT

Background : Chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is now an established technique for renal dialysis. Patients with renal failure cope poorly with major surgery and it is vital that the dialysis catheter tip is sited accurately in the pelvis if long-term catheter function is to be achieved. Laparoscopic placement of CAPD catheters may have potential advantages for renal patients by avoiding the morbidity of a laparotomy. Methods : A retrospective audit was performed of all CAPD catheters inserted at the John Hunter Hospital over a 2-year period. Results of laparoscopically inserted catheters and those placed at laparotomy were compared. Results : Sixty catheters were inserted, 30 laparoscopically and 30 at laparotomy. The mean operative time was 41 min in the laparoscopic patients and 57 min in the laparotomy patients (P= 0.0001). The mean total dose of narcotic administered postoperatively was significantly less in the laparoscopic group (5 mg vs 65 mg, P= 0.00002). There were three minor peri-operative complications in the laparoscopic group and seven peri-operative complications in the laparotomy group, three required reoperation and one resulted in the patient'death. There were no significant differences in the incidence of exit-site infection, catheter blockage, peritonitis, and overall catheter survival, although the laparoscopically placed catheters had been followed up for a shorter period (10 vs 16 months). Conclusions : This laparoscopic technique is safe and effective. Postoperative pain was less than for open placement. Laparoscopically placed catheters had a low incidence of peri-operative complications. Medium-term patency is similar to conventionally placed catheters. This procedure requires no additional equipment to that available for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and takes less time than the open operation.     

Laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters in children

Background

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is preferred over hemodialysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with laparoscopic PD catheter placement and omentectomy in children.

Methods

We reviewed all children (N = 21) who underwent laparoscopic placement of PD catheters and omentectomy. Ages ranged from 3 months to 16 years. Five children had previous major abdominal surgery and required extensive lysis of adhesions. During the same intervention, other surgical procedures were performed using laparoscopy or open technique, including umbilical hernia repair in 3, bilateral inguinal hernia repair in 3, ventral hernia repair in 2, gastrostomy in 4, kidney biopsy in 2, and cholecystectomy in 1.

Results

Thirteen children received successful kidney transplantation and no longer needed dialysis. Two children still have functioning PD catheters. One patient developed membrane failure and was converted to hemodialysis. Four patients recovered enough renal function and no longer need dialysis. There were no complications related to the laparoscopic procedure.

Conclusion

Laparoscopy is ideal for PD catheter placement. It facilitates omentectomy, and it allows for the catheter to be placed in the proper position under direct vision and for lysis of adhesions to increase peritoneal surface. Other abdominal procedures can be performed laparoscopically at the same time.     

Videolaparoscopy as rescue therapy and placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a thirty-two case single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Malfunction of the peritoneal catheter is a frequent complication in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Videolaparoscopy is a minimal invasive technique that allows rescue therapy of malfunctioning catheters and consecutive immediate resumption of PD. Furthermore, Tenckhoff catheters can be safely positioned in patients with previous abdominal surgery. We analysed the clinical diagnosis, videolaparoscopic treatment and the outcome of PD patients on whom videolaparoscopic interventions had been performed at our centre. METHODS: Thirty-two cases of videolaparoscopic interventions were performed for salvage of malfunctioning peritoneal catheters, implantation and abdominal surgical interventions in 25 PD patients. The videolaparoscope was inserted through a mini-laparotomy site of 15 mm diameter which was closed with purse-string sutures at the end of the intervention. RESULTS: Videolaparoscopy was used in 21 cases of catheter malfunction mostly due to omental wrapping (12 cases) and dislocation (five cases). In eight patients with previous surgical abdominal interventions, laparoscopic placement of the PD catheter was performed. In two cases the gall bladder was removed. One case of intestinal occlusion was evaluated laparoscopically in an attempt to minimize invasive surgery. Leakage of the peritoneal fluid presented the only complication caused by insufficient closure of one mini-laparotomy site. Minimal follow-up time of rescued catheters was 5 months. Videolaparoscopy prolonged PD catheter function by a median of 163 days (range 5-1469 days). CONCLUSIONS: Videolaparoscopy prolongs peritoneal catheter survival by treating directly the causes of malfunction. In patients with preceding abdominal interventions, the PD catheter can be placed safely even in cases necessitating surgical preparation like adhesiolysis.     

Laparoscopic salvage of Tenckhoff catheters

Laparoscopic abdominal surgery has opened many previously unexploited diagnostic and therapeutic options. At our institution, we have used laparoscopic techniques in several patients to successfully salvage dysfunctional Tenckhoff catheters. Peritoneal dialysis has gained widespread approval as an acceptable alternative to hemodialysis. Unfortunately, following surgical placement of the catheter, mechanical complications are all too common and usually result in unnecessary removal or replacement. To illustrate the usefulness of laparoscopy in preventing this unnecessary patient morbidity, we present a case study of an easily correctable cause of Tenckhoff catheter outflow obstruction that would have avoided detection under normal circumstances.     

Laparoscopic guidance or revision of ventriculoperitoneal shunts in children.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt is the preferred treatment for hydrocephalus. Known complications include infection, obstruction, and disconnection with the fractured fragment migrating in the peritoneal cavity. We report 17 cases of laparoscopic evaluation and revision of ventriculoperitoneal shunts in children. METHODS: From January 2000 through October 2002, we retrospectively reviewed our experience with laparoscopy and ventriculoperitoneal shunts. RESULTS: Laparoscopy was performed in 17 children with a malfunctioning shunt, presumed shunt dislodgment or disconnection, reinsertion of a shunt after externalization, and primary shunt placement. Six patients (35%) were converted to an open laparotomy due to dense adhesions. Eleven patients (65%) underwent successful laparoscopic-assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: 5/11 (45%) had lysis of adhesions or pseudocyst marsupialization with repositioning of a functional shunt, or both; 3/11 (27%) had successful retrieval of a disconnected catheter with reinsertion of a new catheter; 2/11 (18%) had laparoscopic confirmation of satisfactory placement and function, requiring no revision; 1/11 (9%) had an initial shunt placed with laparoscopic guidance due to the obesity. Operative time for the laparoscopic procedure ranged from 30 minutes to 60 minutes. All laparoscopic procedures used 1-mm or two 5-mm ports. Perioperatively, no adverse neurological sequelae occurred due to the pneumoperitoneum. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic guidance or revision of ventriculoperitoneal shunts permits (1) direct visualization of catheter insertion within the peritoneal cavity, (2) satisfactory positioning, (3) lysis of adhesions or marsupialization with catheter repositioning, or both, and (4) retrieval of fractured catheters.     

Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using a Quinton percutaneous insertion kit.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed a unique technique of laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion which can minimize catheter dysfunction. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing laparoscopic PD catheter placement with a Quinton percutaneous insertion kit between July 2000 and December 2004. RESULTS: Thirty-one catheters were placed laparoscopically. The mean operating time was 52 minutes. Adhesiolysis was required in 9 (29%) and omentectomy or omentopexy in 3 (10%) cases. Late complications included catheter dysfunction in 2 patients (6.5%), debilitating abdominal pain requiring catheter removal in 1 patient, and 1 trocar-site hernia. The mean follow-up was 17 months. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic PD catheter insertion using a Quinton percutaneous insertion kit is safe, reproducible, and effective. It facilitates placement of the catheter tip into the pelvis and allows adhesiolysis, omentectomy, or omentopexy when necessary. Utilization of this technique results in a low rate of PD catheter dysfunction.     

Video-assisted laparoscopic procedures in peritoneal dialysis

Background Although laparoscopy is commonly adopted for the diagnosis and management of various medical or surgical problems, its use for patients with peritoneal dialysis has seldom been addressed. This retrospective study analyzes the indications and clinical effects of this procedure. Methods: A retrospective chart was drawn up and a videotape review performed for 18 laparoscopic procedures involving 198 patients receiving peritoneal dialysis on a long-term basis at our dialysis unit from May 1992 to June 2002. The clinical and demographic parameters in this study included gender, age, underlying renal diseases, duration of peritoneal dialysis before laparoscopy, indications of laparoscopic intervention, laparoscopic findings, time of operation, laparoscopic procedures, postoperative complications, mortality, and catheter results. Results: A total of 18 laparoscopic procedures were performed in 17 uremia patients, with indications including catheter malfunction in five cases, preimplantation evaluation of peritoneal space in three cases, evaluation of the etiology underlying intractable peritonitis in nine cases, and verification of the cause for dialysate leakage in one case. Four (80%) of the five catheter malfunctions were successfully corrected, including one case of catheter migration and three cases of omental wrapping, whereas correction failed in the remaining case because of severe bowel adhesion. New catheter placement after adhesiolysis was successful in all three cases of preimplantation peritoneal evaluation (100%). Of the nine patients whose peritonitis episodes were evaluated, two were found to have secondary peritonitis, two had fungal peritonitis; one had tuberculous peritonitis and four had bacterial peritonitis. In the case of persistent exit-site dialysate leakage, laparoscopy showed a penetrating injury of the abdominal wall, raising a strong suspicion of iatrogenic injury during the tunneling maneuvers in initial catheter placement. Two conversions to laparotomy were performed: one to repair the penetrating injury and the other to save the life of a patient threatened by severe fungal peritonitis with abdominal cocoon formation. The laparoscopic procedures lasted 20 to 150 min (average, 50 min). Despite one instance of postoperative hydrocele, there was no operative mortality. Conclusions: The analytical results of this study demonstrate that the current video-assisted laparoscopic technique is an effective means for managing several problems related to peritoneal dialysis such as catheter malfunction, preimplantation evaluation, location of the source of the dialysate leak, and assessment of the causes for peritonitis. Thus, this technique should always be considered when the these problems arise.