The role of non-LDL:non-HDL particles in atherosclerosis

Elevated concentrations of circulating apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins, other than low-density lipoprotein (LDL), have been implicated as causative agents for the development of atherosclerosis. A form of dyslipidemia, the atherogenic lipoprotein profile, that consists of elevated intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), triglycerides (TGs), dense LDL and dense very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), and low high density lipoprotein-2, occurs in 40% to 50% of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The recently released Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines suggest that because elevated TGs are an independent CAD risk factor, some TG-rich lipoproteins, commonly called remnant lipoproteins, must be atherogenic. Relevant to this series on diabetes, a number of studies have shown that in type 2 diabetes, the severity of CAD is positively related to the numbers of TG-rich particles in the plasma. Although less clear, other studies in type 2 diabetes suggest that elevated levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] may also be independently associated with CAD. In this article, we summarize evidence for the role of apoB-containing lipoprotein particles other than LDL in the development of atherosclerosis and discuss methods of quantification and possible pharmacologic interventions for lowering their plasma concentrations. The particles reviewed include the TG-rich lipoproteins: VLDL and its remnants, chylomicron remnants and IDL, and the C-rich lipoprotein: Lp(a).     

A critical evaluation of the role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular disease: can Lp(a) be useful in risk assessment?

Lp(a) is a structurally complex particle which resembles LDL, but which also contains the distinctive glycoprotein apo(a). Apo(a) is characterized by a variable number of repeated kringle domains, which gives rise to differently-sized Lp(a) isoforms in the population. Although epidemiological studies indicate that elevated Lp(a) concentration and/or small apo(a) isoform sizes increase the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), a causal role for Lp(a) in CHD remains unproven. This is largely due to the difficulty in establishing a relevant animal model to probe Lp(a) function, and the lack of intervention studies in which Lp(a) concentrations are lowered and outcomes followed. The accumulation of apo(a)/Lp(a) in arterial lesions has provided the rationale for numerous in vitro studies aimed at dissecting its function in this milieu. These studies have resulted in the proposal of numerous proatherogenic, prothrombotic and antifibrinolytic roles for both native and modified apo(a)/Lp(a). Although characterization of Lp(a) in the general population is not presently justified, Lp(a) analysis in patients at risk for CHD may be warranted.     

An increased number of very-low-density lipoprotein particles is strongly associated with coronary heart disease in Japanese men,independently of intermediate-density lipoprotein or low-density lipoprotein

BACKGROUND: Japanese patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) usually have slightly elevated triglyceride levels but virtually normal low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels. DESIGN: Case-control study. METHODS: To explore the atherogenecity of mild hypertriglyceridemia, we measured very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) composition and apolipoprotein (apo) B in VLDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), light LDL and dense LDL fractions separated by ultracentrifugation in 61 men with angiographically proven CHD and in 69 men without CHD. Apo B, E, C1 and C3 in VLDL were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Although total- and LDL-cholesterol levels were similar in CHD and control participants, triglyceride levels were significantly higher and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels were lower in CHD patients. Triglyceride, cholesterol and apo C1 and E levels in VLDL were two-fold higher and VLDL-apo B level was three-fold higher in CHD than control patients. IDL-triglyceride levels were significantly elevated in CHD, but IDL-cholesterol level was not. Apo B levels of the dense LDL fraction were significantly elevated in CHD groups, but those of the light LDL fraction were not. These differences were constant when triglyceride levels matched between both groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the VLDL-apo B and VLDL-apo C1 levels were significantly associated with the incidence of CHD independent of the plasma triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol or apo B levels in dense LDL. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that an increased number of VLDL particles is strongly associated with CHD, independently of traditional risk factors or newly recognized atherogenic lipoproteins, such as IDL or small, dense LDL, in Japanese men.     

Lipoprotein (a) as a predictor of coronary heart disease: the PRIME Study

The association of an elevated level of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) with the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) remains controversial. Lp(a) was investigated as a CHD risk factor in the PRIME Study, a prospective cohort study which included 9133 French and Northern Irish men aged 50-59 at entry, without a history of CHD and not on hypolipidaemic drugs. During a follow-up of 5 years, 288 subjects experienced at least one CHD event (myocardial infarction (MI), coronary death, angina pectoris). Lp(a) was measured by immunoassay in all subjects on fresh plasma obtained at entry. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as low-density lipoproteins (LDL)-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, the presence of diabetes, hypertension or smoking were determined. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate Lp(a) level as a CHD risk factor after controlling for the other risk factors. In addition, its possible interaction with LDL- and HDL-cholesterol levels was investigated. Lp(a) appeared a significant risk factor (P<0.0006) in the whole cohort without between-population interaction, even if the association was not statistically significant in the Belfast sample. The relative risk (RR) of CHD events in subjects with Lp(a) levels in the highest quartile was 1.5 times that of subjects in the lowest quartile (RR: 1.56; 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.10-2.21). A high Lp(a) level was a risk for MI, coronary death and angina pectoris. A significant interaction term between Lp(a) and LDL-cholesterol levels, however, was found. The relative CHD risk associated with a Lp(a) level > or =33 mg/dl in comparison with Lp(a) <33 mg/dl increasing gradually from 0.82 (95% CI: 0.28-2.44) in men with LDL-cholesterol in the lowest quartile (<121 mg/dl) to 1.58 (95% CI: 1.06-2.40) in the highest quartile (>163 mg/dl). In conclusion, Lp(a) increased the risk for MI and angina pectoris, especially in men with a high LDL-cholesterol level. This study which analyzed Lp(a) level using a measurement independent of apolipoprotein (a) size on fresh plasma, has confirmed utility of Lp(a) as a predictor of CHD.     

Current Topics on Low‐Density Lipoprotein Apheresis

Abstract: The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) levels, and coronary heart disease (CHD) refractory to diet and lipid‐lowering drugs is poor. For such patients, regular treatment with low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the therapeutic option. Today, there are four different LDL‐apheresis systems available: immunoadsorption, heparin‐induced extracorporeal LDL/fibrinogen precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL‐adsorption, and LDL‐hemoperfusion. Despite substantial progress in diagnostics, drug therapy, and cardiosurgical procedures, atherosclerosis with myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral cellular disease still maintains its position at the top of morbidity and mortality statistics in industrialized nations. Established risk factors widely accepted are smoking, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and central obesity. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Besides the elimination of other risk factors, in severe hyperlipidemia (HLP) therapeutic strategies should focus on a drastic reduction of serum lipoproteins. Despite maximum conventional therapy with a combination of different kinds of lipid‐lowering drugs, however, sometimes the goal of therapy cannot be reached. Mostly, the prognosis of patients suffering from severe HLP, sometimes combined with elevated Lp(a) levels and CHD refractory to diet and lipid‐lowering drugs is poor. Hence, in such patients, treatment with LDL‐apheresis can be useful. Regarding the different LDL‐apheresis systems used, there were no significant differences with respect to the clinical outcome or concerning total cholesterol, LDL, high‐density lipoprotein, or triglyceride concentrations. With respect to elevated Lp(a) levels, however, the immunoadsorption method seems to be the most effective. The published data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL‐apheresis in patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia refractory to maximum conservative therapy is effective and safe in long‐term application.     

Serum lipid levels associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease is associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-1 infection

The long-term effects of fat metabolism, storage and utilization in HIV-1 infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) including a protease inhibitor are profound and cause increasing concern. The main importance of these lipid/metabolic disorders lies in their assumed contribution to an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). In the general population increased levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] constitute an independent risk factor for CHD by itself as well as in combination with increased levels of cholesterol and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, respectively. Two hundred and fifty-six patients with 27 +/- 7 months HAART and 84 treatment-naive HIV-1 positive patients were screened for cardiovascular risk factors. The subjective perception of fat wasting and/or accumulation in different sites of the body, which was possible to evaluate in 235 patients on HAART and 73 treatment-naive patients, the levels of plasma triglycerides (TG), cholesterol, LDL and high-density lipoproteins (HDL)-cholesterol, LDL/HDL ratio and Lp(a) were measured. Of the patients on HAART, 42% (98/235) reported abnormal fat distribution as compared with 4% (3/73) of the treatment-naive patients (P<0.0001). The levels of TG, cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, but not HDL-cholesterol or Lp(a) were higher (P<0.0001) in the HAART group as compared with the naive group. Very high Lp(a) levels (> 700 mg/l) were more common among HAART patients as compared with naive, 14% (36/256) vs 2% (2/83); P=0.0022. The Lp(a) levels correlated to the levels of LDL-cholesterol, but not to total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol or TG, and did not differ between patients with and without subjective perception of abnormal fat distribution. A significant number of the HAART patients had very high levels of Lp(a) and various combinations of increased lipid values associated with considerably increased risk for CHD. The elevation of Lp(a) did not relate to any other clinical or laboratory parameter than to LDL-cholesterol.     

Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a class of lipoprotein particles having the lipid composition of plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL), but with a distinct protein moiety comprised of two proteins linked together by a disulfide bridge. The two proteins are apoB100, the protein moiety of LDL, and apo(a), a heavily glycosylated protein that is specific for Lp(a). Apo(a) has a strong structural similarity to plasminogen and has a wide-size polymorphism that has a genetic origin and is partially responsible for the size and density heterogeneity of Lp(a). High plasma levels of Lp(a) are associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease that is related to the atherogenic and thrombogenic potentials of this lipoprotein enhanced by the presence of other risk factors, among which are high plasma levels of LDL or low levels of high-density lipoprotein. The factors determining the plasma levels of Lp(a) have not been clearly identified except for an association with different alleles of the apo(a) gene, which is located in the long arm of chromosome 6. Currently there are no generally accepted ways to normalize the plasma levels of Lp(a) by either dietary and/or pharmacologic means. Until further progress in this area is made, patients with high plasma levels of Lp(a) should be advised to correct modifiable risk factors in order to decrease the cardiovascular pathogenicity of this lipoprotein class.     

Lipoprotein(a) and the atherothrombotic process: Mechanistic insights and clinical implications

Although many epidemiologic studies have pointed at an association between plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and cardiovascular risk, the data obtained have been conflicting because of a number of factors, particularly those dealing with plasma storage, lack of assay standardization, population sample size, age, gender, ethnic variations, and variable disease endpoints. Moreover, the attention has been primarily focused on whole Lp(a), with relatively less emphasis on its constituent apolipoprotein(a) and on the apolipoprotein B100-containing lipoprotein, mainly low-density lipoprotein (LDL), to which apolipoprotein(a) is linked. According to recent studies, small-size apolipoprotein(a) isoforms may represent a cardiovascular risk factor either by themselves or synergistically with plasma Lp(a) concentration. Moreover, the density properties of the LDL moiety may have an impact on Lp(a) pathogenicity. It has also become apparent that Lp(a) can be modified by oxidative events and by the action of lipolytic and proteolytic enzymes with the generation of products that exhibit atherothrombogenic potential. The role of the O-glycans linked to the inter-kringle linkers of apolipoprotein(a) is also emerging. This information is raising the awareness of the pleiotropic functions of Lp(a) and is opening new vistas on pathogenetic mechanisms whose knowledge is essential for developing rational therapies against this complex cardiovascular pathogen.     

Lipids in type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes increases the risk of cardiovascular disease two- to fourfold compared to the risk in nondiabetic subjects. Although type 2 diabetes is associated with a clustering of risk factors, the cause for an excess risk of cardiovascular disease remains unknown. Lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities in type 2 diabetes include particularly elevated levels of total and very low-density lipoprotein triglycerides and reduced levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels are usually normal if glycemic control is adequate but LDL particles are small and dense. According to prospective population-based studies, total cholesterol is a similar risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with type 2 diabetes as it is in nondiabetic subjects. High total triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol may be even stronger risk factors for CHD in patients with type 2 diabetes than in nondiabetic subjects. Recent drug treatment trials have indicated that the lowering of total and LDL cholesterol by statins, and the lowering of total triglycerides and the raising of HDL cholesterol by fibrates, are at least as beneficial in diabetic patients as in nondiabetic subjects in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.     

Is Lipoprotein (a)—Apheresis Useful?

Numerous epidemiological investigations have shown the importance of cholesterol, and in particular low density lipoprotein (LDL), and of the lipoproteins in the development of coronary sclerosis. A continuing relationship between cholesterol levels and coronary morbidity has been established. The LDL concentration in the blood is, in particular, to be made responsible for the development of arteriosclerosis and especially of coronary heart disease (CHD). Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], as a risk factor for premature cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, can be lowered by LDL-apheresis. Especially in isolated high levels of Lp(a) with CHD or polygenic hypercholesterolemia with elevated Lp(a) levels, LDL-apheresis can be indicated and can be useful to improve endothelium regulation and induce changes in coronary tone by an increase in endothelial derived relaxing factor. Lipoprotein (a) can be dramatically lowered by LDL-apheresis, but clinical improvement especially by low LDL is not still not clarified. Studies with weekly apheresis with statins versus drug therapy alone are necessary. To clarify the controversial discussions of whether lowering Lp(a) may be unnecessary or necessary to arrest progression of CHD, more clinical and randomized studies are needed. Lipoprotein (a) can be also lowered by current LDL-apheresis methods.     

Serum lipids, lipoprotein(a) level, and apolipoprotein(a) isoforms as prognostic markers in patients with coronary heart disease

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study prognostic factors for death in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), focusing on serum lipids and lipoproteins. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: The study subjects were 964 patients with angina pectoris who underwent coronary angiography between 1985 and 1987. Follow-up, including survival and cause of death, was carried out in April 1998. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients died. Increasing age, diabetes and low levels of HDL cholesterol and of apolipoprotein (apo) AI were associated with increased risk of total mortality and cardiac mortality. In men, low levels of LDL cholesterol and of apoB were associated with increased risk of death, but not of cardiac death only; high levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] were not associated with increased risk. In women, however, there was a trend towards increased risk with increasing Lp(a) levels (P = 0.054); the smallest isoform of apo(a) was associated with a twofold increase in risk. In women, but not in men, risk decreased with increasing molecular weight of the apo(a) isoforms. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst lipoprotein variables, low levels of HDL cholesterol and of apoAI and the presence of low-molecular weight isoforms of apo(a) are associated with increased risk of death in patients with CHD. Apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) levels seem to be more important as risk factors amongst women. Low LDL cholesterol and apoB levels were associated with increased risk, but only in men. These findings demonstrate the importance of a gender-specific analysis of risk factors for CHD.     

Impact of elevated serum lipoprotein (a) concentrations on the risk of coronary heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a marked increase of coronary heart disease (CHD). We aimed to assess the impact of elevated serum lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) concentrations on the risk of CHD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A consecutive series of 352 outpatients was investigated. We determined the serum lipid profile and checked the patients for a history of CHD and of its traditional risk factors. Furthermore, the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the degree of elevation of the serum Lp(a) concentration: serum Lp(a) concentrations greater than 50 mg/dL, between 30 and 50 mg/dL, and less than 30 mg/dL, a presumed high normal value; and the prevalence of CHD was compared among the 3 groups. The serum Lp(a) concentrations in the subjects varied widely from 0.4 to 163.6 mg/dL. Patients with CHD had significantly higher serum Lp(a) concentrations than those without CHD (P = .0045). Logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with the presence of CHD revealed that elevated serum Lp(a) is a significant risk factor (P = .0246). The prevalence of CHD increased with increasing serum Lp(a) concentrations (P = .048). Patients with serum Lp(a) concentrations greater than 50 mg/dL had a significantly higher prevalence of CHD than those with serum Lp(a) concentrations less than 30 mg/dL: the odds ratio of an elevated serum Lp(a) concentration was 3.346 (P = .039). In conclusion, elevated serum Lp(a) is a significant risk factor; and the risk of CHD appears to increase with increasing serum Lp(a) concentrations. Serum Lp(a) concentration of 50 mg/dL might represent a threshold level in relation to the risk of CHD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Is Lipoprotein(a) an Independent Risk Factor for Ischemic Heart Disease in Men? The Quebec Cardiovascular Study

Objectives. This study was undertaken to determine whether lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD) and to establish the relation of Lp(a) to the other lipid fractions.Background. Several, but not all, studies have shown that elevated Lp(a) concentrations may be associated with IHD; very few have been prospective.Methods. A 5-year prospective follow-up study was conducted in 2,156 French Canadian men 47 to 76 years old, without clinical evidence of IHD. Lipid measurements obtained at baseline included total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apoprotein B and Lp(a). During the follow-up period, there were 116 first IHD events (myocardial infarction, angina, death). Adjusted proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk for the different variables. The cohort was also classified according to Lp(a) levels and other lipid risk factor tertiles to evaluate the relation of elevated Lp(a) levels to these risk factors. A cutoff value of 30 mg/dl was used for Lp(a). Risk ratios were calculated using the group with low Lp(a) levels and the first tertile of lipid measures as a reference.Results. Lp(a) was not an independent risk factor for IHD but seemed to increase the deleterious effects of mildly elevated LDL cholesterol and elevated total cholesterol and apoprotein B levels and seemed to counteract the beneficial effects associated with elevated HDL cholesterol levels.Conclusions. In this cohort, Lp(a) was not an independent risk factor for IHD but appeared to increase the risk associated with other lipid risk factors.     

Association of levels of lipoprotein Lp(a), plasma lipids, and other lipoproteins with coronary artery disease documented by angiography

In a study of 307 white patients who underwent coronary angiography, the relationship of coronary artery disease (CAD) to plasma levels of lipoprotein Lp(a) and other lipid-lipoprotein variables was examined. Lp(a) resembles low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in several ways, but can be distinguished and quantified by electroimmunoassay. CAD was rated as present or absent and was also represented by a quantitative lesion score derived from estimates of stenosis in four major coronary vessels. Coronary lesion scores significantly correlated with Lp(a), total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels by univariate statistical analysis. By multivariate analysis levels of Lp(a) were associated significantly and independently with the presence of CAD (p less than .02), and tended to correlate with lesion scores (p = .06). Among subgroups Lp(a) level was associated with CAD in women of all ages and in men 55 years old or younger. An apparent threshold for coronary risk occurred at Lp(a) lipoprotein mass concentrations of 30 to 40 mg/dl, corresponding to Lp(a) cholesterol concentrations of approximately 10 to 13 mg/dl. Plasma Lp(a) in white patients appears to be a major coronary risk factor with an importance approaching that of the level of LDL or HDL cholesterol.     

Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, and remnantlike particles: emerging risk factors

Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] was first described more than 35 years ago, adequate prospective data have only recently supported Lp(a) as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). In vitro studies suggest that Lp(a) contributes to atherogenesis directly by cholesterol uptake and indirectly by the inhibition of fibrinolysis. In patients with CHD or a significant risk for CHD, Lp(a) should be measured and treated with either niacin or estrogen if the patient has Lp(a) cholesterol levels of more than 10 mg/dL or an Lp(a) mass of more than 30 mg/dL. In addition, homocysteine and remnantlike lipoprotein cholesterol are strongly supported by prospective or population-based prevalence data as independent risk factors for CHD. Homocysteine levels of more than 14 mumol/L should be treated with vitamin supplements of folate, B6, and B12. Remnantlike lipoprotein cholesterol is the product of a novel immunoassay that separates the partially hydrolyzed triglyceride-rich remnant particles. The association of these particles with CHD risk in women may explain the small independent CHD risk that triglycerides have in women in the Framingham Heart Study. A clear therapeutic intervention has not been documented but may include diet, fibric acid derivatives, or hydroxymethylglutamyl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors.     

Lp(a) apheresis for the treatment of severe CHD patients with Lp(a) hyperlipidemia

Objectives. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the specific lipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)] removal with immunosorption columns for treatment of severe CHD patients with elevated (more than 30 mg/dL) Lp(a) level. Methods. The following inclusion criteria were used for the recruitment of patients: age – under 55; coronary atherosclerosis documented by angiography; Lp(a) greater than 60 mg/dl; normal total and LDL cholesterol; clinically apparent progression of the CHD. Specific removal of Lp(a) from plasma was carried out with immunosorbtion columns ‘Lp(a) Lipopak’ contained specific antibodies against human Lp(a). Results. During last 10 years more than 1200 Lp(a) apheresis procedures have been carried out for ten severe CHD patients with 2–3 vessels disease in Moscow, Russia and Ludenscheid, Germany with Lp(a) Lipopak columns (POCARD Ltd, Russia). The Lp(a) level was reduced on the average on 75–85%, other parameters are practically constant during one procedure and duting all period of treatment. Our experience with Lp(a) Lipopak columns has shown that the specific removal of Lp(a) from the patient's plasma to 30 mg/dL or lower by weekly Lp(a) apheresis resulted in a significant improvement in the patient's health status and quality of life. After numerous Lp(a) apheresis procedures the progression of atherosclerosis was stopped in all cases, while some segments of coronary arteries showed regression of atherosclerotic plaques. Conclusion. We conclude that Lp(a) apheresis could be a very effective therapy for severe CHD patients with elevated Lp(a), and/or Lp(a) and LDL but for whom LDL level could be effectively corrected by lipids lowering drugs.     

Apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism is associated with coronary heart disease in polygenic hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In addition to high serum cholesterol levels, various cardiovascular risk factors may be involved in the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) in hypercholesterolemic subjects. As the levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an important and independent cardiovascular risk factor, are high in polygenic hypercholesterolemia (PH), we investigated plasma Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes in relation to occurrence of CHD events in PH patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Lp(a) levels and apo(a) isoforms were determined in 191 PH patients, 83 normocholesterolemic subjects with CHD, and 94 normocholesterolemic controls without CHD. Lp(a) levels were similar in the hypercholesterolemic subjects with (n=100) or without CHD (n=91): 21.4 (range 6.6-59.23) vs 18.5 (range 5.25-57.25) mg/dL (p=NS). Low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms were more prevalent (55%) in the PH patients with CHD, whereas high molecular weight apo(a) isoforms were more prevalent (62.6%) in those without CHD: this difference was significant (p<0.05). A stepwise multiple-discriminant analysis made in order to determine the independence of common cardiovascular risk factors, Lp(a) levels and low molecular weight apo(a) isoforms in predicting CHD among hypercholesterolemic subjects showed that the presence of a positive family history of CHD, smoking, age, and the presence of at least one apo(a) isoform of low molecular weight were independently associated with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high Lp(a) levels, our findings do not support the hypothesis that Lp(a) plays an independent role in determining clinical CHD in PH subjects. However, the presence of at least one low molecular weight apo(a) isoform is an independent genetic predictor of CHD in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Together with other cardiovascular risk factors, apo(a) phenotypes should be assessed to evaluate the overall CHD risk status of all subjects with high serum cholesterol levels.     

Do coronary heart disease risk factors change over time?

The stability over a 12-year period of several coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors was evaluated in 348 individuals who had remained healthy following baseline measurements made of the same variables in 1981. CHD risk factors evaluated were fasting and post-glucose challenge (120-minute) plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, plasma triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations, and the ratio of LDL/HDL cholesterol concentrations. Approximately 40% to 60% of individuals in the highest CHD risk quartile (or lowest in the case of HDL cholesterol concentrations) in 1981 were still at highest risk in 1993. A similar proportion of individuals at lowest risk in 1981 were still in that category in 1993. At least 50% of the participants in this prospective analysis experienced a change by 1 quartile or more in each of the metabolic CHD risk factors measured, and these differences were highly statistically significant for all variables measured with the exception of the TG and HDL cholesterol concentrations. These results demonstrate that the implicit assumption in epidemiological studies that CHD risk factors at baseline remain stable may require examination.     

Apolipoprotein-B, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the long-term risk of coronary heart disease in men

We examined whether plasma apolipoprotein-B (apo-B) levels add further information on the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) after taking into account low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations and other traditional risk factors. Among 2,072 CHD-free men from the Québec Cardiovascular Study at entry and followed for 13 years, 230 had a first CHD event (CHD death or nonfatal myocardial infarction). Increased apo-B (tertile 1 vs 3) levels were associated with a significant increased risk of CHD after adjustment for nonlipid and lipid risk factors other than LDL cholesterol levels (relative risk 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 2.73). High plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations (tertile 1 vs 3) were also associated with an increased risk of CHD independently of nonlipid and lipid risk factors (relative risk 2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.44 to 2.84). However, apo-B levels modulated to a significant extent the risk of CHD associated with increased concentrations of LDL cholesterol (>/=4.3 mmol/L). For instance, among men with high LDL cholesterol levels, those with an apo-B level <128 mg/dl were not at increased risk for CHD (relative risk 1.53, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 2.62). In contrast, high levels of apo-B and LDL cholesterol were associated with a significant twofold increased risk of CHD (p <0.001). Receiver-operating curve analysis also indicated that plasma apo-B levels improved the ability to discriminate incident CHD cases among patients with high LDL cholesterol levels compared with a model based on LDL cholesterol levels (p = 0.04). In conclusion, plasma apo-B levels modulated the risk of CHD associated with LDL cholesterol over a 13-year follow-up.     

Serum lipoprotein(a) concentration as a cardiovascular risk factor in Kuwaiti type 2 diabetic patients

Serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in some nondiabetic populations, is largely under genetic control and varies among ethnic and racial groups. We evaluated serum Lp(a) concentration and its relationship with traditional CHD risk factors (age, sex, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia) as well as stage of diabetic nephropathy in 345 type 2 diabetic patients. Lp(a) concentration was skewed with median (2.5th, 97.5th percentiles) of 25.0 (8.1, 75.7) mg/dl. Twenty-three of 55 (41.8%) patients with CHD had increased (>30 mg/dl) Lp(a) compared with 102 of 290 (35.1%) patients without CHD (P=.35). Twelve of 27 (44.4%) female patients with CHD had increased Lp(a) compared to 11 of 28 (39.3%) males (P=.70). Lp(a) was significantly (P<.05) higher in females than males, but the logistic regression analysis showed significant association of Lp(a), LDL-C, and duration of diabetes mellitus (DM) with CHD in male patients only. Although female patients with CHD and macroalbuminuria had significantly (P<.05) higher Lp(a) than normoalbuminuric female patients without CHD, no such association was found in males and no significant association was found between Lp(a) and the degree of albuminuria. Partial correlation analysis controlling for age, sex, and BMI showed significant correlation of Lp(a) with total cholesterol only (P=.03) and no correlation was found with other lipid parameters. Multiple regression analysis did not show significant associations of Lp(a) with standard CHD risk factors, HbA(1c), and plasma creatinine. This study is in agreement with studies in other populations, which showed that Lp(a) may not be an independent risk factor for CHD in patients with DM. However, as Lp(a) could promote atherogenesis via several mechanisms, follow-up studies in our patients will confirm if increased Lp(a) concentration can partly account for the poorer prognosis when diabetic patients develop CHD.