Clinical significance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was studied in 60 liver transplant recipients. Antibodies to HCV were tested by both a second-generation ELISA test and a four-recombinant immunoblot assay (4-RIBA) just before the transplant and every three months thereafter. HCV RNA detection was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at least three times after the transplant in all the patients. Thirty-nine patients tested negative by ELISA before LT (group A), 14 patients tested positive by both serological tests (group B), and seven tested positive only by ELISA (group C). Posttransplant hepatitis was diagnosed in 11/14 in group B in comparison with 3/39 in group A (P<0.001) and 1/7 in group C (P<0.05). HCV RNA was detected in the sera of 14/14 patients in group B but in only 1/7 in group C and 6/39 in group A. Only 2/15 patients developed posttransplant hepatitis in the absence of HCV RNA detection. These data suggest that HCV is the major cause of hepatitis after LT. Patients HCV seropositive by RIBA test before the transplant formed a group of high-risk patients for developing viremia and hepatitis afterwards.Part of this work was presented at the XIVth International Congress of the Transplantation Society. Paris. August 1992.This work was supported by a grant from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias de la Seguridad Social (FISS 92/0357).     

Flexible and individualized treatment to achieve sustained viral response for recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

Summary. Hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation is universal and is a major cause of long‐term graft failure. Improving the effectiveness of recurrent hepatitis C treatment is extremely important. We studied 35 anti‐hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐positive patients who underwent liver transplantation. Among the 35 patients, 25 patients had recurrent hepatitis C and received antiviral treatment. HCV RNA load after liver transplantation was increased by 3.68‐fold. The antiviral treatment regimen comprised pegylated‐interferon (180 μg) every 2 weeks and ribavirin at a dose of 200–400 mg every day. The treatment duration was flexible and individualized, and depended on viral response to treatment. The dosage of tacrolimus was decreased gradually to minimize immunocompromise. Median (interquartile) serum level of tacrolimus was 6.9 (6–8.9) ng/mL at initiation of treatment and 3.8 (3.6–5) ng/mL at the end of treatment. One patient (4.0%) was withdrawn from the study, and three patients (12%) died of infection during treatment. At end of treatment, 18 of 25 patients (72%) were negative for serum HCV RNA. After an additional 6 months following the end of treatment, 16 of the 25 patients (64%) had sustained viral response (SVR) and only two patients had HCV relapse. The 1‐year, 3‐year and 5‐year survival rates were 91.4%, 84.5% and 84.5% for all patients and 88.0%, 82.8% and 82.8% for the 25 patients who received antiviral therapy. In conclusion, recurrent HCV infection is an important issue in liver transplantation. The flexible regimen of antiviral therapy and individualized immunosuppressive agents that was applied in this study achieved a SVR rate of 64%.     

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in infants and children after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important cause of liver injury following liver transplantation in adults. We hypothesized that the prevalence of HCV infection in children following liver transplantation would be lower than the prevalence in adults after liver transplantation because HCV-related liver disease leading to liver transplantation in children is low and children require less blood products than adults during transplantation. We therefore performed a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of HCV infection in children who had undergone liver transplantation. Serum samples were obtained from 62 of 65 (95.4%) consecutive patients surviving for more than six months after transplantation. Using a second-generation enzyme-linked, immunosorbent assay (ELISA-2) and a second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-II), antibodies to HCV were detected in 5.1% (3 of 59) of the subjects. Using a single-step, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), HCV RNA was detected in 6.2% (4 of 62). All HCV-positive children had undergone liver transplantation before the initiation of routine screening for HCV in blood donors; overall 30 patients were transplanted prior to routine screening of blood products for HCV. The prevalence of HCV in infants and children after liver transplantation in our study is substantially less than the rates reported in adults. This difference may be due, in part, to the lower volume of blood product exposure and to the fact that children, as opposed to adults, rarely have chronic HCV infection as a cause of end-stage liver disease.Accepted for poster presentation at the Update on Hepatic Transplantation, 1993 Annual Meeting of the AASLD.     

SUMOylation of nonstructural 5A protein regulates hepatitis C virus replication

Viruses exploit cellular SUMOylation machinery to favour their own propagation. We show that NS5A is a target protein of small ubiquitin‐like modifier (SUMO) and is SUMOylated at lysine residue 348. We demonstrated that SUMOylation increased protein stability of NS5A by inhibiting ubiquitylation, and SUMOylation was also required for protein interaction with NS5B. These data imply that SUMO modification may contribute to HCV replication. Indeed, silencing of UBC9 impaired HCV replication in Jc1‐infected cells, and HCV replication level was also significantly reduced in SUMO‐defective subgenomic replicon cells. Taken together, these data indicate that HCV replication is regulated by SUMO modification of NS5A protein. We provide evidence for the first time that HCV exploits host cellular SUMO modification system to favour its own replication.     

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: clinical and therapeutical issues

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection after liver transplantation is almost constant, assessed by the persistence of HCV RNA in 90% of cases. Acute hepatitis appeared in 75% of patients at a median of 4 months' post-transplantation. The 5-year actuarial rate of acute and chronic hepatitis on the graft is 75% and 60%, respectively. The rate of HCV cirrhosis on the graft is variable from 8 to 25% at 5 years. After transplantation, HCV viraemia is dramatically increased and correlates with the occurrence of acute hepatitis on the graft. Intrahepatic levels of HCV are high at the time of acute hepatitis, and decrease with constitution of chronic graft hepatitis lesions, implying an immunological response to the viral infection. A relationship between genotype 1b and the prevalence of HCV hepatitis on the graft has been suggested in European but not American series. The influence of the age of the recipient, quasispecies, viral compartmentalization, immunosuppressive treatment, and of HLA matching is being evaluated. The 5-year patient survival is around 65-80%. However, the occurrence of cirrhosis with a risk of graft failure may decrease the 10 and 15-year patient survival. Attempts to give prophylactic post-transplant antiviral treatment are under evaluation. Antiviral treatment of post-transplant graft lesions with combination therapy interferon–ribavirin gave promising results but indications and duration of treatment should be evaluated.
In conclusion, HCV reinfection is frequent, but medium-term survival is good. However, the long-term graft and patient survival remains unknown, and efficient prevention and treatment of HCV graft is mandatory.     

Diminished viral replication and compartmentalization of hepatitis C virus in hepatocellular carcinoma tissue

Analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication and quasispecies distribution within the tumor of patients with HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can provide insight into the role of HCV in hepatocarcinogenesis and, conversely, the effect of HCC on the HCV lifecycle. In a comprehensive study of serum and multiple liver specimens from patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation, we found a sharp and significant decrease in HCV RNA in the tumor compared with surrounding nontumorous tissues, but found no differences in multiple areas of control non-HCC cirrhotic livers. Diminished HCV replication was not associated with changes in miR-122 expression. HCV genetic diversity was significantly higher in livers containing HCC compared with control non-HCC cirrhotic livers. Tracking of individual variants demonstrated changes in the viral population between tumorous and nontumorous areas, the extent of which correlated with the decline in HCV RNA, suggesting HCV compartmentalization within the tumor. In contrast, compartmentalization was not observed between nontumorous areas and serum, or in controls between different areas of the cirrhotic liver or between liver and serum. Our findings indicate that HCV replication within the tumor is restricted and compartmentalized, suggesting segregation of specific viral variants in malignant hepatocytes.Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a hepatotropic, single-stranded RNA virus that replicates in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes and does not integrate into the host genome (1). HCV circulates in vivo as a dynamic distribution of closely related viral variants that are commonly referred to as “quasispecies” (2). Such diversity confers a remarkable advantage to the virus under host selective constraints (3–5). One of the most important features of HCV is its extraordinary ability to persist in up to 80% of infected individuals (6). Approximately 20–30% of chronic HCV carriers develop cirrhosis and its long-term sequelae, including hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), leading to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) or liver-related death (6). The incidence of HCC in the United States has more than tripled over the past 3 decades (7), an alarming trend due primarily, if not exclusively, to HCV infection (8).Although epidemiologic evidence has linked chronic HCV infection to a significantly elevated risk of developing HCC (9), the mechanisms whereby HCV promotes hepatocarcinogenesis remain to be elucidated (10). Whether HCV elicits liver cancer indirectly, through chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and continuous liver regeneration (11), or directly, through the expression of tumor-promoting viral proteins, in a manner analogous to other oncogenic viruses, such as human papillomaviruses and Epstein–Barr virus (12, 13), remains unknown. The major challenges in defining the role of HCV in the pathogenesis of HCC include the inherent limitations of available experimental systems, the low number of infected hepatocytes, the low level of HCV antigen expression, and the limited availability and size of infected liver samples (14).Insights into the levels of HCV replication within the tumor of patients with HCV-associated HCC may shed light on the role of HCV in hepatocarcinogenesis. This remains controversial, however, in part because of the difficulty in obtaining multiple paired liver specimens from the tumor and adjacent nontumorous tissue. Although some previous investigations have shown no differences in the presence and levels of HCV RNA between the tumor and nontumorous liver tissues (15–17), others have reported low to undetectable levels of HCV RNA within the tumor (18–20). Several reports have indicated that miR-122 is an essential cellular host factor for HCV replication (21, 22). Initial studies performed in liver cancer, regardless of the etiology, have shown a reduced expression of miR-122 (23, 24), whereas recent reports have demonstrated that its expression in HCV-associated HCC is maintained (25, 26) or even increased (27). Thus, the central questions of whether HCV actively replicates in malignant hepatocytes, its relationship with miR-122 expression, and whether viral replication is directly involved in hepatocarcinogenesis remain to be fully elucidated. A related issue is whether changes in viral replication within the tumor are associated with selection of specific viral variants; however, very limited information is available on the composition of the HCV quasispecies and the possible compartmentalization between the tumor and the surrounding nontumorous areas or serum from the same individuals with HCV-associated HCC (20, 28–30).To investigate the role of HCV in hepatocarcinogenesis, we took advantage of a unique collection of multiple liver specimens from patients with HCV-associated HCC who underwent OLT or partial hepatectomy to simultaneously study the level of viral replication, its correlation with the intrahepatic expression of miR-122, and the composition and distribution of the viral population both within and outside the tumor.     

Liver transplantation for acute and chronic viral hepatitis

Summary. Hepatotrophic viruses are responsible for a substantial proportion of cases of both end-stage chronic liver disease and of acute liver failure which are treated by liver transplantation. We review here current practice in transplantation for viral-induced liver disease addressing, in particular, the selection of patients for transplantation and the increasingly recognized problem of recurrent disease in liver grafts.     

Risk factors for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Summary.  Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease is the main indication for liver transplantation performed in Europe and the United States. Recurrence of hepatitis C in the graft is universal and may lead to chronic hepatitis in most patients and to cirrhosis in 20–30% of patients within 5–10 years of transplantation. The natural history of HCV recurrence is highly variable but leads to a lower survival rate than other recurrent liver diseases. The immunosuppressed status and several other factors have been linked with the pattern and severity of recurrence. What remains controversial are those factors associated with fibrosis progression and how these could be modified to improve outcome of recurrent hepatitis C. No single factor but a combination of several factors is associated with fibrosis progression on the graft. The major factors associated with accelerated disease recurrence include: high viral load pre- (>10⁶ IU / mL) and / or early post-transplantation (>10⁷ IU / mL at 4 months), donor older than 40–50 years, prolonged ischaemic time, cytomegalovirus coinfection, over immunosuppression and / or abrupt changes in immunosuppression, HIV coinfection, infection by genotype 1b. Cautious follow-up of the pathology of the graft is mandatory including routine biopsies and / or noninvasive monitoring of fibrosis.     

Herpes simplex virus hepatitis 4 years after liver transplantation

If not promptly recognized and treated, herpes simplex virus (HSV) hepatitis is associated with a high mortality. A patient transplanted for primary sclerosing cholangitis required, 4 years later, a colectomy for a steroid-resistant flare of ulcerative colitis. He subsequently developed fever, with genital and oral ulcerations. He was hospitalized for diabetic decompensation with massive elevation of serum aminotransferases. Examination revealed vesicles on the hands. Liver biopsy showed Cowdry type B inclusions. Therapy with acyclovir was immediately initiated and the patient recovered. This case illustrates the diagnostic importance of mucocutaneous lesions in the assessment of complications after liver transplantation.     

肝移植术后丙肝复发抗病毒治疗患者持续病毒应答影响因素分析

目的分析肝移植术后丙肝复发抗病毒治疗患者产生持续病毒应答(SVR)的影响因素。方法回顾性分析2003～2009年39例肝移植术后丙肝复发并进行抗病毒(聚二乙醇干扰素和利巴韦林)治疗的患者的临床资料。结果本组中21例因不良反应停药,18例完成全疗程规范治疗,疗程25～105周;有4例(22.22%)获得SVR,其平均治疗周期是57周。统计分析显示,非ⅠB型基因(P=0.023)、治疗前丙肝病毒载量<10~6 copies/ml(P=0.044)以及早期病毒应答(EVR)(P=0.019)与SVR的获得有关。结论非ⅠB基因型、低水平HCV RNA和EVR是肝移植后丙肝复发抗病毒治疗产生SVR的影响因素。     

Treatment strategy for hepatitis C after liver transplantation

A significant proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection develop liver cirrhosis and complications of end-stage liver disease over periods of two to three decades and require liver transplantation, although re-infection is common and leads to further adverse events, given that such patients receive life-long immunosuppression. Because of the critical organ shortage worldwide, living-donor liver transplantation has an important role in many countries, especially in the Far East. Despite previous arguments, the results of recent well-designed studies suggest equivalent outcomes for deceased-donor and living-donor liver transplantation. No specific immunosuppression regimen has proven advantageous, but the general rule is “low and slow”. Combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy is the current standard treatment, but compared to this therapy in the immunocompetent population, its efficacy in clearing the virus remains low. Moreover, its general application is hindered by the high prevalence of intolerability, lowering its efficacy from the aspect of intention to treat. Retransplantation becomes an option when treatment for disease progression fails, but it should be considered at an earlier stage in patients with a lower MELD (model for end-stage liver disease) score compared to that used for primary transplantation, which is a great challenge with the current critical organ shortage. The need for new anti-HCV drugs to further delay disease progression or even to enhance viral clearance, presumably specific HCV life-cycle inhibitors, is urgent. The liver transplant community must maintain an open mind regarding the development of these drugs and focus on their availability for early clinical trials in liver transplant recipients.     

PNPLA3 as a liver steatosis risk factor following living‐donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Aim

Liver steatosis frequently occurs following liver transplantation (LT) and can affect patient outcome. Here, we aimed to clarify the steatosis and steatohepatitis risk factors that apply after living‐donor LT for chronic hepatitis C.

Methods

We retrospectively examined 43 transplant recipients and donors, and tested for single nucleotide polymorphisms in the PNPLA3 gene. Liver biopsies taken 1 year after transplantation and yearly thereafter, or when abnormal liver enzyme levels were detected, were examined by histopathology.

Results

Liver steatosis (>5% steatotic hepatocytes) was evident in 13 of 43 cases (30%), and steatohepatitis in 3 (7.0%). The average time to steatosis after LT was 2.74 ± 1.55 years. The PNPLA3 rs738409 GG genotype, a steatosis risk factor, was identified in 13 recipients and 10 donors. Steatosis prevalence did not differ according to recipient genotype. However, this condition was significantly more common among patients who received tissue from donors carrying the rs738409 GG genotype compared to those with grafts from donors of the CC or CG genotype (60, 7, and 26%, respectively; P < 0.05). All 3 steatohepatitis cases were associated with the GG donor genotype.

Conclusion

The PNPLA3 rs738409 GG donor genotype affects liver steatosis and steatohepatitis risk following living‐donor LT.     

A case of acute liver failure due to hepatitis E virus,liver transplantation,and development of de novo autoimmune hepatitis

Acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection could lead to acute liver failure (ALF), which requires liver transplantation (LT). HEV infection could progress to chronic infection in an immunosuppressed host. De novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare occurrence of AIH during post‐LT immunosuppressive therapy in patients who underwent LT due to not AIH but some other etiology. Here, we report the first case of ALF due to HEV infection, the recurrence of HEV after LT that responded to ribavirin therapy, and then the development of de novo AIH showing a complete response to glucocorticoid therapy but multiple relapses after steroid withdrawal. This peculiar case suggests that HEV could have a pathogenic role in the development of the de novo AIH; additionally, this case report could help clinicians make therapeutic decisions in the post‐LT condition.     

Impact of hepatitis G virus co-infection on the course of hepatitis C virus infection before and after liver transplantation

Background/Aims: Hepatitis G virus (HGV), a new RNA virus that is parenterally transmitted, has frequently been found in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection but its role in chronic liver disease is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of HGV infection in transplantation patients infected with hepatitis C and to assess the impact of HGV co-infection on the course of HCV infection after liver transplantation.Methods: Eighty-nine liver transplantation recipients with persistent hepatitis C viremia detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were evaluated. Serum samples were tested before and after liver transplantation for HGV RNA by two different PCR methods: LC^TM assay (Abbott Laboratories) and an RT-PCR procedure which we developed using the silica gel technique for extraction of the HGV RNA. E2 antibodies were detected before orthotopic liver transplantation by an EIA-test. HCV RNA was quantified by branched DNA assay, and HCV genotype was determined. A mean of nine liver biopsy specimens were examined for each patient and the severity of the lesions was compared in HCV-positive patients with or without HGV co-infection.Results: The concordance between the two HGV RNA detection methods was excellent and the reproducibility of our RT-PCR procedure was confirmed. The prevalence of pretransplantation and posttransplantation HGV infection was 11% and 19%, respectively. Pretransplantation HGV infection was positively correlated with posttransplantation HGV infection (p<0.001). Before transplantation the E2 antibodies seroprevalence was 34%. Seven patients became HGV RNA positive after transplantation, but all of them were negative for E2 antibodies. Among the patients who remained RNA negative after liver transplantation, 40% were positive for E2 antibodies (p = 0.04). Pretransplantation clinical features (except AST mean value) were not different in patients with HCV and HGV co-infection and those with HCV only. After a mean follow-up of 34 months (range: 6 to 70), (75%) patients developed histological features of recurrent hepatitis but the frequency of the occurrence of graft hepatitis was not different between HGV/HCV co-infected patients and those with HCV alone (p=0.89). The mean interval from orthotopic liver transplantation to recurrence was 12.2 months (range: 3–63), which was not different for HVG/HVC-co-infected patients and HCV-infected patients. The histological severity of posttransplantation liver disease, and the graft and patient survival were not different for patients with and without HGV co-infection.Conclusions: Our results suggest the general persistence of HGV infection after liver transplantation, but HGV co-infection did not appear to influence the posttransplantation course of HCV infection. Before transplantation the prevalence of E2 antibodies was 34%, and our data clearly indicate that E2 antibodies were protective against HGV infection.     

Herpes simplex virus hepatitis after pediatric liver transplantation

T. Hori, Y. Ogura, S. Okamoto, A. Nakajima, K. Kami, J. Iwasaki, Y. Yonekawa, K. Ogawa, F. Oike, Y. Takada, H. Egawa, J.H. Nguyen, S. Uemoto. Herpes simplex virus hepatitis after pediatric liver transplantation
Transpl Infect Dis 2010: 12: 353–357. All rights reserved Abstract: Herpes simplex virus (HSV) hepatitis has a fatal impact on the outcome of organ transplanted recipients. Here, we present a thought‐provoking case of HSV hepatitis in a high‐risk recipient after living‐related liver transplantation (LRLT). A 1‐month‐old female newborn infant was affected by HSV encephalitis. Fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) of unknown etiology occurred suddenly at 4.4 years of age. Viral infections were ruled out as the cause of FHF. Intensive care including plasma exchange (PE) was started, and the preoperative treatments for ABO incompatibility were performed. Thereafter, LRLT was performed emergently. Although strong immunosuppression for ABO incompatibility was continued after LRLT, antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) occurred on postoperative day (POD) 4. PE was repeated and improvements were obtained. However, liver dysfunction appeared on POD 8. Histopathological findings of liver needle biopsy clearly revealed HSV hepatitis, although the results of HSV DNA and antibody titer in blood sample did not clearly indicate HSV infection. On POD 21, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) occurred and the plasma and immunoglobulin were replenished. Our pediatric recipient recovered successfully from AMR, HSV hepatitis, TMA, and repeated sepsis. We conclude that well considered therapy based on the real‐time detection of HSV hepatitis is indispensable for the further improvements of outcome in HSV hepatitis after LRLT.     

Inhibitory effect of branched-chain amino acid granules on progression of compensated liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus

Background. A phase II randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis to investigate the inhibitory effect of branchedchain amino acid (BCAA) granules for oral use (TK-98) on disease progression. Methods. Patients who had compensated liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus with baseline serum albumin levels between 3.6 and 4.5 g/dl were assigned to the TK-98 group, which was treated with BCAA granules (TK-98) for 168 weeks, or to a control group (no treatment). Results. No symptoms indicating decompensated cirrhosis, including ascites, edema, and hepatic encephalopathy were reported in either the TK-98 or control group during the study observation period. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was noted in eight of the 39 patients studied, and of these three received TK-98 (15.8%) and five were untreated (25.0%). A time-to-event analysis for the effect of BCAA therapy on development of HCC revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. However, an additional analysis of data from a subgroup with a baseline serum albumin level of <4.0 g/dl showed that the incidence of HCC was likely to be lower in BCAA-treated patients. Conclusions. BCAA may inhibit hepatic carcinogenesis in patients with compensated cirrhosis with a serum albumin level of <4.0 g/dl.     

肝移植术后丙型肝炎复发患者抗病毒治疗效果及其对肝纤维化的影响

目的通过对肝移植术后丙型肝炎复发患者进行抗病毒治疗,研究抗病毒治疗效果以及对肝纤维化进展的影响。方法对本院2005年6月至2012年12月收治的23例肝移植术后丙型肝炎复发患者进行干扰素联合利巴韦林抗病毒治疗,观察病毒学应答情况、不良反应以及治疗前后肝组织病理情况。计数资料以例数表示,不同抗病毒疗效组间肝纤维化情况比较采用等级资料秩和检验。结果 12例患者因不良反应终止治疗。23例患者共获得结束时病毒学应答(ETVR)18例,其中6例获得持续病毒学应答(SVR),12例出现反跳。19例患者完成前后肝组织病理检查,SVR组肝纤维化减轻3例、持平1例、进展0例;停药后反跳组肝纤维化减轻2例、持平3例、进展5例;无应答组肝纤维化减轻0例、持平1例、进展4例;3组间抗纤维化效果比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.330,P=0.026)。结论肝移植术后丙型肝炎复发患者抗病毒治疗SVR率较低,有效的抗病毒治疗可延缓肝纤维化进展,取得SVR的患者肝纤维化改善效果最佳。