Phase II study of combination therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin against postoperative small residual disease in patients with stage I c-IV ovarian cancer--KCOG 989 trial

The tolerability and feasibility of combination therapy with paclitaxel (TXL) and carboplatin (CBDCA) against small residual disease following first-line optimal debulking of stage I c-IV ovarian cancer were evaluated in a multicenter dose-finding study. Eligibility criteria included histologically diagnosed stage I c-IV epithelial ovarian cancer with a postoperative residual lesion < or = 10 mm in diameter, no prior chemotherapy, and written informed consent of the patient and his/her family members to the chemotherapy. Twenty-two patients were enrolled and 20 of them were eligible. The patients were to receive 5 courses of TXL (175 mg/m2) and CBDCA (AUC 5) every 3 weeks. Hematological toxicities occurred in the form of grade 3 leukopenia during 25.7% of all courses, grade 3 neutropenia during 32.0% of all courses, and grade 4 neutropenia during 56.0% of all courses. No courses were associated with grade 4 leukopenia. G-CSF support was needed during 48 of 109 courses (44%) and caused normalization of the leukocyte count from a nadir of 1,921 +/- 434/mm3 after a mean time of 6 +/- 3.1 days, compared with 6 +/- 3.6 days needed for recovery from a nadir of 2, 357 +/- 360/mm3 without G-CSF support. This indicates similarly rapid recovery from severe leukopenia with the use of G-CSF. All eligible patients completed at least 5 courses of the chemotherapy. Some courses were given at a reduced dose or delayed due to toxicity but these dosage modifications were thought to be acceptable for both TXL and CBDCA. Five courses of TXL combined with CBDCA were tolerated well in this patient population.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of carboplatin and paclitaxel with a biweekly schedule in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel using a biweekly schedule in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were determined preliminarily in some patients. The criteria for eligibility for study entry included histologically and/or cytologically confirmed NSCLC (stage IIIb or IV), no prior treatment, and measurable disease. Paclitaxel was given in combination with a fixed dose of carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 3 mg/ml x min, every 2 weeks. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 100 mg/m(2), and the dose was increased in increments of 20 mg/m(2). Three to six patients were allocated to each dose level. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients (11 male and 8 female) with a median age of 61 years (range 43-74 years) and a median ECOG performance status of 0 (range 0-1) were enrolled. The MTD of paclitaxel proved to be 160 mg/m(2), and the DLT was neutropenia, which improved well following treatment with G-CSF. Gastrointestinal toxicity was well tolerated. Of 17 patients who received four cycles or more, 7 (41%; 95% confidence interval 18.4-67.1%) responded to this combination therapy. The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel did not differ from published data. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for phase II study is paclitaxel 140 mg/m(2) with a carboplatin AUC of 3 mg/ml.min. This biweekly regimen is highly effective and acceptable, and the present data indicate that the regimen may be suitable for use on an outpatient basis.     

Combined chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer--phase I study

The current initial standard chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer is a regimen with a combination of platinum and taxane. However, the 5-year survival rate remains at 40% or lower, and the recurrence rate is as high as 70-80%. Second-line chemotherapy for recurrent cases has not yet been established. We conducted a phase I study of combined chemotherapy with paclitaxel (TXL) and carboplatin (CBDCA) administered weekly for recurrent and refractory ovarian cancer. The subjects were patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of malignant epithelial ovarian cancer, with recurrent or refractory disease after the initial chemotherapy. TXL was administered at escalating concentrations up to 60-100 mg/m(2), while the dose of CBDCA was fixed at an AUC of 2. In regard to the dosing schedule, premedication was performed as defined before TXL administration, and TXL and CBDCA were administered, in that order, by intravenous infusion for over at least 1 hour. The 4-week period, including the administration of both drugs on Day 1, 8, and 15, was regarded as one course of treatment. No cases developed grade 4 hematoxicity, but leukopenia and neutropenia occurred. All cases of leukopenia of step 4 and step 5 developed grade 3 leukopenia. Grade 2 thrombocytopenia was one example at a low rate. Non-hematological toxicity included neuropathy, arthralgia and muscle pain, but none of the patients developed grade 3 or 4. The response rate was 41.7% (5/12). The response rate of cases administered over TXL 80 mg was 66.7% (4/6). Based on these results,the following dose schedule was recommended for planning and designing a phase II study in the future: CBDCA AUC 2+TXL 80 mg/m(2) (Days 1, 8, and 15 q 4 weeks).     

Dose finding study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for ovarian cancer (JKTB)

We conducted a dose-finding study for combination therapy of paclitaxel (Taxol; TXL) and carboplatin (Paraplatin; CBDCA). TXL is a novel plant-derived anticancer agent that is a diterpene derivative possessing the taxane ring. The subjects were patients with ovarian carcinoma, who were evaluated by a modified Fibonacci method. The dosage of TXL was 150 to 180 mg/m2. CBDCA was administered by dose escalation from AUC = 4 to 7. The administration schedule was as follows. Pre-medication was administered before TXL was given. TXL was then administered by intravenous infusion over 3 hours, followed by CBDCA. The dose of CBDCA was determined using the Calvert formula: [AUCX (GFR + 25)]. GFR was calculated with the Jelliffe equation. The non-hematological toxicities observed in 15 eligible cases were mainly grade 1, with no grade 3 or above, and no increase in severity was observed with stepping up. The hematological toxicities were grade 3 leukopenia in 5 of 15 cases, neutropenia in 5 cases and thrombocytopenia in 0 cases. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. The lowest counts of leukocytes and neutrophils were reached after 10.8 and 11.7 days, respectively. The toxicities were reversible in most cases with subsequent recovery. The above findings indicate that the recommended dosages for TJ therapy for Japanese ovarian cancer patients should be TXL 180 mg/m2 and CBDCA at a target of AUC = 6.     

A phase I dose-escalation study of docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is a widely active cytotoxic agent. The principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the 3-weekly regimen are neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) may allow higher doses of docetaxel to be administered with potentially greater anticancer efficacy. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of docetaxel given with G-CSF support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had solid tumours and were aged 18-75 years with a WHO performance status of up to 2. Strict criteria for liver function were followed. Patients may have received one previous regimen of chemotherapy in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy. Cohorts of three to six patients received docetaxel over 60-90 min every 3 weeks, commencing at 110 mg/m(2) and escalating at 10 mg/m(2) increments. Patients also received G-CSF 5 micro g/kg/day until neutrophil recovery. A 3-day corticosteroid prophylaxis was given. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with median age 55 years (range 29-75) were included. Fourteen (48%) had previously received chemotherapy. At the 170 mg/m(2) dose level (the MTD), two of three patients had DLTs and 160 mg/m(2) was determined to be the recommended dose. The principal DLTs were skin and neurosensory toxicity. Asthenia was frequent, especially at dose levels >/=140 mg/m(2). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in only 10 patients (35%) and was not dose related, with febrile neutropenia in three patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel may be escalated considerably above standard doses when administered with G-CSF support. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 160 mg/m(2). With escalated-dose docetaxel, DLTs were non-haematological and qualitatively similar to the toxicity profile at standard doses.     

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin in ovarian cancer-comparison of adverse effects between monthly and weekly administration

Adverse effects of first-line combination chemotherapy performed with paclitaxel (PTX) and carboplatin (CBDCA) (TJ regimen) on 15 ovarian cancer patients who had had no prior chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) were reviewed retrospectively according to National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. The M group (M) consisted of 7 patients treated with a total of 45 courses of the M-TJ regimen. Every 3-4 weeks, PTX was administered as a 3-hour infusion at the average dose level of 175 mg/m2/course on day 1 and CBDCA (targeted AUC = 6) was also administered on day 1. The W group (W) consisted of 10 patients who received a total of 49 courses of the W-TJ regimen. They were treated with PTX (80 mg/m2, 1 h, average dose level = 203 mg/m2/course) on day 1, 8 and 15, and with CBDCA (targeted AUC = 5) on day 1 every 4 weeks. Adverse events with grade 3 or above hematologic toxicity were oligochromemia (M: 24.4%, W: 22.4%), leukopenia (M: 55.6%, W: 40.8%), neutropenia (M: 84.4%, W: 61.2%) and thrombocytopenia (M: 17.8%, W: 8.2%). Grade 3 or above nonhematologic toxicity was not found in the W group, and anorexia (2.2%), nausea (2.2%), diarrhea (2.2%) and arrhythmia (2.2%) were developed only in the M group patients. Toxicity grades for neutropenia, arthralgia, myalgia and neuropathy were significantly lower in the W group. Based on the collected data, the W-TJ regimen is considered to be more effective than the M-TJ regimen for reducing the grade and occurrence of adverse events in ovarian cancer patients.     

Effective combination chemotherapy using paclitaxel in the treatment of a small-cell lung cancer patient resistant to multiple drugs]

We used paclitaxel to successfully treat a patient with small-cell lung cancer resistant to multiple drugs. The patient was diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (cT4N2M1, extensive disease) and initially treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 (day 1) + etoposide 100 mg/m2 (day 1-3) from August 1996 (4 courses). A partial response (PR) was obtained, but there was a gradual regrowth in the primary site after 17 months. The next chemotherapy was weekly chemotherapy (CODE regimen) from May 1998 for 5 weeks, but the response was no change (NC). After the therapy, a regrowth of the primary site was observed, and a CT scan demonstrated multiple metastases of the lung and liver. From March 1999, he was administered the next chemotherapy regimen of carboplatin (CBDCA) 350 mg/m2 (day 1) + etoposide 100 mg/m2 (day 1-3) (2 courses). However, the response was NC again. From August 1999, we changed the chemotherapy regimen and administered CBDCA AUC 5 (day 1) + paclitaxel (TXL) 175 mg/m2, (day 1, 3-hour-infusion) (1 course). A chest radiograph showed an extreme shrinkage of the primary and metastatic sites. A PR was obtained, but Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytepenia were observed with this therapy. Thus, he was treated with TXL alone (100 mg/m2, day 1, 1-hour-infusion) in the next course. After this therapy, a chest radiograph showed a more extreme shrinkage of the primary and metastatic sites. It is suggested that combination chemotherapy using TXL is effective in the treatment of a patient with small-cell lung cancer resistant to multiple drugs.     

Phase I study of vinorelbine and carboplatin combination in patients with taxane and anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer

AIM: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the carboplatin-vinorelbine combination in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer relapsing or progressing after prior taxane and anthracycline containing chemotherapy were enrolled. Cohorts of 3-6 patients were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) with escalated doses of carboplatin [range, area under the curve (AUC) 4-6] on day 1 and vinorelbine (range, 20-35 mg/m(2)) on days 1 + 8 recycled every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with a median age of 58 years and performance status (WHO) of 0-2 were treated at 6 DLs. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 20 for response. DLT was reached at carboplatin 6 AUC and vinorelbine 35 mg/m(2), and therefore, this was considered as the MTD. Prophylactic G-CSF administration could not allow further dose escalation. The recommended dose for further phase II testing was defined at carboplatin 6 AUC on day 1 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. Among 98 administered treatment cycles 41 (42%) and 7 (7%) were complicated with grades 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities included grade 2 peripheral neuropathy in 3 cycles and grades 2 and 3 fatigue in 32 (32%). CONCLUSION: The present study determined the feasibility of the combination of carboplatin at AUC 6 (day 1) and vinorelbine at 30 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8 ) without G-CSF support in patients with taxane and anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer. Phase II studies at these doses should follow in order to determine the activity of the regimen.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal carboplatin and etoposide.

BACKGROUND: We attempted to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of etoposide (VP-16) when administered in combination with carboplatin (CBDCA) (300 mg m-2) and administered via the intraperitoneal (IP) route. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 26 patients were treated on this trial. CBDCA was administered at a fixed dose of 300 mg m-2) while VP-16 was started at a dose of 200 mg m-2 and escalated at 50 mg m-2 increments. Both agents were mixed together in 2 litres of 5% Dextrose and administered as quickly as possible into the peritoneal cavity. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). RESULTS: The MTD for this regimen was CBDCA 300 mg m-2 and VP-16 350 mg m-2. Patients > or = 70 years of age or who had received more than six cycles of previous chemotherapy, tolerated this regimen poorly. The MTD for this group of patients was CBDCA 200 mg m-2 and VP-16 50 mg m-2. Neutropenia was the dose limiting toxicity for both groups. The mean peritoneal/plasma peak ratio was 18.3 for CBDCA and 12.7 for VP-16. The pharmacologic advantage (peritoneal/plasma AUC ratio) was 14.9 for CBDCA and 8.8 for VP-16. Although measurable disease was not a requirement for entrance into this study a response rate of 27% was noted in 15 patients with evaluable disease who had ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacologic advantage exists for both CBDCA and VP-16 when administered together via the IP route.     

Phase I study of paclitaxel,carboplatin and UFT in chemo-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Objective We conducted a phase I study of paclitaxel (PTX), carboplatin (CBDCA), and UFT in chemo-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Method Twenty-one chemo-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled. The study was conducted as a phase I dose-escalation study of various doses of systemic PTX followed by CBDCA on day 1 and oral UFT (400 mg/m²) on days 1–5 and 8–12, with the cycle repeated at 21-day intervals. At least three patients were enrolled in each step. Results The main toxicities were neutropenia and paresthesia, but were tolerable and reversible in all cases. Overall response rate was 57% (12 out of 21). The MTD was not reached at the highest dose level after the first cycle. Given previous recommends of PTX at 225 mg/m² and CBDCA AUC 6 for two-drug therapy, the recommended dose for the phase II study under our regimen was set at PTX 225 mg/m² on day 1, CBDCA AUC 6 on day 1, and UFT 400 mg/m² on days 1–5 and 8–12. Conclusion The combination of PTX, CBDCA, and UFT showed promising activity and acceptable toxicity in these chemo-naive patients, supporting the development of this combination as a feasible chemotherapeutic option for advanced NSCLC.     

Effect of whole body hyperthermia on carboplatin disposition and toxicity in dogs

Fifty dogs with refractory or disseminated spontaneous tumours were evaluated in two independent phase I studies using either carboplatin (CBDCA) alone or CBDCA plus whole body hyperthermia (WBH). CBDCA was administered as a 30 min infusion at the onset of the plateau phase of WBH in dogs receiving combined treatment. Serum samples were collected and drug disposition was determined in both treatment groups. The dose-effect relationship was mathematically described with a logistic regression model developed from categorical toxicity data accumulated throughout the first two treatment courses in all dogs. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as that dose which resulted in a 50% probability of achieving moderate or severe toxicity. The only toxicities observed were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were dose-dependent. The nadir occurred between 7 and 14 days following treatment. A significant decrease in the area under the serum CBDCA versus time curve for dogs undergoing WBH was consistent with increased tissue binding of the drug as well as increased urinary eliminations. Serum AUC values determined following the first course of treatment were predictive of subsequent toxicity in both treatment groups. The MTD (95%CI) for CBDCA and CBDCA/WBH were estimated to be 318(44) and 239(51) mg/M² respectively (p = 0–08). A randomized phase II evaluation should be initiated to determine if a therapeutic gain can be achieved using combined CBDCA and WBH. Further refinement of the CBDCA dose in such a trial should be based on both pharmacokinetic parameters and normal tissue response.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pemetrexed and carboplatin given in combination, to derive a recommended dose for phase II studies, and to explore its efficacy. We assessed toxicities and explored the activity of the drug combination exclusively in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The pharmacokinetics of both agents was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (23 male, four female) with MPM were treated on five escalating dose levels. Doses ranged from pemetrexed 400 mg/m(2) (as a 10-minute intravenous infusion), followed by carboplatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) 4 mg/mL.min (as a 30-minute intravenous infusion) to pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL.min. All patients had a World Health Organization performance status of 1. A total of 163 courses of treatment were administered (median, six; range, one to 10). RESULTS: The main toxicity was hematologic, particularly neutropenia, although this was characteristically short-lived and caused few clinical problems. The MTD was pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2), carboplatin AUC 6, because three of the five patients treated at this dose level experienced a dose-limiting toxicity. Eight partial responses (in 25 assessable patients) were observed for a response rate of 32%. Seventy percent of patients noticed an improvement in symptoms, usually (84%) after only two courses. Median time to progression was 305 days, and median survival time was 451 days. CONCLUSION: The MTD was pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL.min. The recommended phase II dose of the combination is pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL.min. The combination is both active and well tolerated in MPM and deserves further exploration.     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine,administered as a standard and constant dose-rate infusion,in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors (LOA-2)

The major purposes of this study were to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), toxicity profile, and antitumor activity of gemcitabine and paclitaxel combination therapy when administered to patients with advanced solid tumors, using two infusion schedules of each agent. Paclitaxel was administered on day 1, followed by gemcitabine, and gemcitabine alone was administered on day 8, of each 21-day treatment course. In the initial phase of the trial, paclitaxel was administered during 3 hours and gemcitabine during 30 minutes (schedule A). After the MTD was determined on this schedule, patients were then treated with paclitaxel during 1 hour and gemcitabine at a fixed dose-rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min (schedule B). Forty-six patients were treated with 176 courses at 7 dose levels. The MTD for schedule A was 1,300 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2) and for schedule B was 1,000 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine and paclitaxel, respectively. The DLT for schedule A was neutropenia and for schedule B was neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was relatively mild. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel, using both schedules of administration in the current trial, is a promising chemotherapeutic regimen.     

Phase I study of second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Docetaxel and carboplatin have a broad spectrum of antitumor activity. We conducted a phase I study of docetaxel and carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities in this second-line combination chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with escalating docetaxel doses in combination with a fixed-target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5 mg min/ml of carboplatin on day 1 of a 3-4-week cycle. The carboplatin dose was determined by multiplying the AUC by the clearance predicted using the Chatelut formula. The docetaxel dose was escalated from 40 mg/m2 to the MTD by 10 mg/m2 increments. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients previously treated with anticancer drugs were enrolled through three dose levels (40, 50 and 60 mg/m2 of docetaxel). All patients were assessable for toxicity and response. The MTD was docetaxel 60 mg/m2 with a carboplatin target AUC of 5 mg min/ml, and the dose-limiting toxicities in two of four patients were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Overall, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia of grade 3/4 occurred in eight patients (50%) and three patients (19%), respectively. Four patients (25%) and two patients (13%) experienced both grade 1 diarrhea and dermatitis, respectively. Allergic reactions, fluid retention, pneumonitis, neurotoxicity and mucositis were not observed. Of 16 patients, 5 showed an objective response (response rate 31%; 95% CI 14-56%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated second-line chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of NSCLC. Docetaxel 50 mg/m2 under the carboplatin target AUC of 5 mg x min/ml using the Chatelut formula was the recommended dose for phase II study.     

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin in advanced gynecologic tumors: a prospective phase I/II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR).

BACKGROUND: Single-agent platinum and single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) are both effective in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Based on evidence that combination platinum-containing regimens offer superior efficacy versus single-agent regimens, we conducted this study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PLD in combination with carboplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I/II dose-finding study, six courses of PLD (20, 30, 40 or 50 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 6) were administered every 28 days to women with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Three to six patients were treated at each dose level; an additional 12 patients were treated at the MTD. RESULTS: PLD 40 mg/m2 was identified as the MTD when administered with carboplatin. Five of 18 patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity at the MTD; two patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, and one each had grade 3 emesis and grade 3 thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. No patient developed cardiotoxicity. In 11 patients evaluable for response, there were two complete responses, two partial responses and four patients with stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD for PLD when administered in combination with carboplatin is 40 mg/m2. This regimen is well tolerated and offers promising activity in women with advanced gynecologic malignancies.     

Phase I dose escalation study of topotecan combined with alternating schedules of paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced solid tumors

Background:Combining topotecan with other cytotoxics has been problematic due to marrow suppression. A phase I trial was initiated to identify the optimal sequence and maximum-tolerated dose of topotecan in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Patients and methods:Patients with advanced cancer and performance status ECOG 2. The starting dose was paclitaxel 175 mg/m² day 1, carboplatin AUC 6.0 day 1, and topotecan 0.5 mg/m² daily day 1–5 (early sequence). The next course of paclitaxel and carboplatin administration was delayed to day 5 (late sequence). Treatment was repeated every three weeks. After determining maximum-tolerated dose without cytokines, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was added and further dose escalation was pursued. Results:Fifty-one patients were entered; men : women ratio 30 : 21. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for the early sequence was neutropenia at doses paclitaxel mg/m²/carboplatin AUC 5/topotecan mg/m² (PCT) 175/5/0.75 for four to five days. DLT for the late sequence was neutropenia at PCT doses of 175/5/1.0 for four days. G-CSF 5 µg/kg subcutaneously starting day 6 permitted further topotecan dose escalation. After adding G-CSF, late sequence DLT was neutropenia at doses 175/5/1.25 for four days. Forty-six patients were evaluable for response and of those, there were thirteen partial responses. Conclusions:The late sequence resulted in less toxicity and was better tolerated. The early sequence maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 175/6/0.5 for five days. The late sequence MTD was PCT 175/5/0.75 for five days. The late sequence MTD with G-CSF was 175/5/1.0 for four days. The recommended phase II PCT dose is the late sequence 175/5/1.0 for four days with G-CSF.     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine and carboplatin in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie Study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the 21 days carboplatin plus gemcitabine regimen in previously untreated patients with stage IV non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: At least three patients were entered at each dose level. The starting dose was carboplatin AUC 4 mg/ml per min (Area Under the Curve; Calvert formula) on day 1 and gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. Carboplatin was increased to AUC 5 (level 3, 4) then to AUC 6 (level 5-7). Gemcitabine was increased to 875 (level 2, 3), 1000 (level 4, 5), 1250 (level 6) and finally 1500 mg/m(2) (level 7). Twenty-nine patients were entered into this phase I study. RESULTS: At dose level 6, a DLT (grade 4 thrombocytopenia) was observed in one out of six patients. At dose level 7, no DLT was observed during the first course, so the MTD was not reached. During the second course, two out of four patients presented grade 4 thrombocytopenia. None of the five patients receiving two courses at level 6 presented a DLT, so this level was retained for further phase II studies. Of the 25 patients assessable for response, five achieved partial responses with a response rate of 20% (95% CI, 7 to 41%). The median survival time was 7 months and the 1-year survival rate was 24% (95% CI, 9 to 45%). CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin given on day 1 and gemcitabine given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks seems to be an acceptable regimen. The DLT consists exclusively of severe thrombocytopenia. Despite the MTD was not reached with carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml per min and gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2), the recommended dose for further phase II studies is carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml per min and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2).     

Phase I-II study of biweekly paclitaxel administration with fixed-dose-rate cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer

Background Both paclitaxel (TXL) and cisplatin (CDDP) show efficacy against gastric cancer. The aim of this phase I-II study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with these two agents. Methods Nineteen patients entered the phase I part of the study, and 21 patients entered the phase II part. TXL infusions were administered on days 1 and 15, with a fixed 3mg/m² dose of CDDP. Results In the phase I part of the study, we determined dose level 5, which represented a TXL dose of 18mg/m², with CDDP 3mg/m², to be the MTD. The recommended dose (RD) was level 4, with a TXL dose of 16mg/m² with CDDP, 3mg/m². In the phase II part of the study, the response rate was 25.0%; five patients had a partial response, seven had stable disease, 6 had progressive disease, and 2 were not evaluable. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was the most common adverse event and occurred in 65% of the patients. During treatment, 25% of the patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, but febrile neutropenia was not shown in any of the patients. Major nonhematological toxicities were nausea/vomiting, anorexia, fatigue, alopecia, and sensory neuropathy. Adverse reactions of grade 3 or 4 were shown by two patients, one with anorexia (5%) and the other with sensory neuropathy (5%). Conclusion The RD was determined to be TXL 14mg/m², with CDDP 3mg/m².     

CPT-11联合CF/5-FU方案治疗胃肠道癌的Ⅰ期临床研究

目的探索CPT-11(开普拓)联合CF/5-FU治疗胃肠道癌的最大耐受剂量(MTD)和剂量限制性毒性(DLT).方法 CPT-11初始剂量为120mg/m2,然后150mg/m2,180mg/m2和200mg/m2 iv d1,递增剂量直至出现DLT.CF 200mg/m2iv 2h,然后5-FU 400mg/m2快速静滴,接着5-FU 600mg/m2持续静滴22h,第1天、第2天给药,2周重复.结果 20例胃肠道癌患者共完成化疗111周期,中位数6周期.MTD为200mg/m2,DLT为腹泻和WBC减少.结论我们推荐CPT-11180mg/m2联合CF/5-FR每2周重复的方法,作为国内PS为0～1胃肠癌患者的一线二线化疗方案.     

Phase I clinical trial of irinotecan with oral capecitabine in patients with gastrointestinal and other solid malignancies

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of irinotecan and capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Thirty-four patients received 122 courses of irinotecan 200 to 300 mg/m(2) as an intravenous infusion during 30 minutes on day 1 and capecitabine 1,500 to 3,000 mg/d orally 12 hours apart starting on day 2 for 14 days, repeated every 21 days (one course). Three to seven patients were treated in six dose-escalation cohorts. Three of 7 (43%) patients treated with irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d had course 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defining maximum tolerated dosage (MTD). Fatigue and diarrhea were the major DLTs, and other events included neutropenia, anorexia, and hand-foot syndrome. At one dose level below the MTD, none of 7 patients treated with irinotecan 275 mg/m(2), and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d (36 courses) had course 1 DLT. Grade III to IV toxicities beyond course 1 included neutropenia (11% of all courses), fatigue (3.4%) and hand-foot syndrome (3.4%). There were only two episodes of febrile grade II neutropenia. There were no toxic deaths. Transient antitumor response was noted in one patient with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil-refractory colon cancer. The combination of irinotecan 275 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d represents a safe, favorable, and convenient outpatient regimen warranting further phase II evaluation.