中文版多维疲乏目录应用于脑卒中患者的信效度检验

目的 验证中文版多维疲乏目录(Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory,MFI-20)应用于脑卒中患者的信度和效度.方法 2019年4月至2020年1月,以收治于上海市2所康复医院的374例脑卒中住院患者作为调查对象,采用自行编制的一般资料调查表、苗雨等修订的中文版MFI-20及中文版疲劳严...     

中文版多维疲劳量表在2型糖尿病患者中的信效度验证

目的：验证多维疲劳量表（MFI-20）在2型糖尿病（T2DM）患者中的信度和效度。方法：将MFI-20量表中文版应用于211例T2DM患者,以验证量表的信度和效度。结果：因子分析显示修订后的量表维持原量表20个条目不变,包含躯体疲劳、心理疲劳和脑力疲劳3个维度,可累计解释方差的56.9%。MFI-20量表得分与健康状况调查简表-活力维度（SF-36-VT）得分显著相关（r=-0.803,P<0.01)。量表总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.91,各维度的Cronbach’s α系数均达0.85以上。结论：中文修订版MFI-20量表在T2DM人群中具有较好的信度和效度,可作为2型糖尿病相关疲劳的可靠性测评工具。     

疲劳严重程度评估量表在2型糖尿病患者中应用的信效度分析

目的评价中文版疲劳严重程度评估量表在2型糖尿病患者中应用的信效度。方法采用便利取样的方法,选取2019年4月-2020年4月在我院老年医学科病房住院的2型糖尿病患者200例,将疲劳严重程度评估量表(中文版)应用于2型糖尿病患者,验证量表的信度和效度。结果中文版FSS量表共含9个条目,其Cronbach′sα系数为0.893,Sperman折半信度系数为0.894,重测信度系数为0.905,内容效度为条目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)0.801～1.000,总量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.902。通过探索性因素分析提取出1个公因子,累积方差贡献率为57.81%。验证性因素分析得到各项拟合指数:卡方自由度比1.98、拟合优度指数0.942、调整后拟合优度指数0.921、比较拟合优度指数0.930。采用多维疲劳量表(MFI-20)作为效标,MFI-20总分与中文版FSS量表总分呈显著正相关(r=0.755,P0.05)。结论 FSS-CHI内容简洁,在2型糖尿病患者中应用具有良好的信效度,可作为评估疲劳严重程度的测量工具。     

多维疲劳量表应用于肿瘤患者的信度和效度验证

目的 评价多维疲劳量表的信效度.方法 将多维疲劳量表(MFI-20)译成中文版,通过174例肿瘤患者进行信效度测量.结果 量表含3个公因子共20个条目,为心理疲劳、躯体疲劳、精神疲劳,共解释总方差的56.21％;疲劳量表总得分与生命质量量表总得分的相关系数为-0.647;整体量表内部一致性为0.867,公因子的内部一致性分别为0.755、0.782、0.613.结论 MFI-20具有很好的效度及高度的内在一致性.     

中文版吞咽障碍造影评分量表的信度和效度研究

目的:汉化吞咽障碍造影评分量表(videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale,VDS)并分析其信度和效度,为评估脑卒中患者吞咽障碍提供简单、有效的工具。方法:对英文版VDS进行翻译和文化调适,并采用中文版VDS对47例脑卒中患者进行评估,对其结果进行信度和效度分析。结果:中文版VDS量表总体Cronbach’sα系数为0.769,各维度的Cronbach’sα系数是0.707—0.912;重测信度总体的组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)为0.951,各条目的ICC为0.732—1.000;测量者间信度总体的ICC为0.731,各条目的ICC为0.703—0.877;每一个条目与其所在维度的相关系数为0.721—0.854(P0.01),每一个条目与其所在维度的相关系数均高于其他维度的相关系数;结构效度采用因子分析,共提取出4个公因子,累积贡献率为64.59%;通过spearman相关分析其外部效度发现中文版VDS量表结果与中文版经口摄食功能评估量表结果、健康调查简表结果相关。结论:中文版VDS量表在脑卒中患者检验中具有好的信度与效度,可用于评估我国脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者的吞咽功能。     

简明健康状况调查表评价中国脑卒中患者生存质量的信度、效度和可应用性

目的：评价中文版简明健康状况调查表（SF-36）用于调查中国脑卒中患者的生存质量时的信度、效度和可应用性。方法：选择2000—06-2001-03在广州中医药大学两所附属医院诊治的，意识清醒，能够清楚地表达自己的意见的急性期、恢复期和后遗症期的脑卒中患者197例，由经培训的访谈员进行调查，内容包括简明健康状况调查表（共36条，包括躯体活动功能、躯体功能对角色功能的影响、疼痛、健康总体自评、活力、社会功能、情绪对角色功能的影响和心理健康等8个维度）、生存质量指数、日常生活活动能力（Barthel指数）、神经功能缺损计分、总的生活能力状态及部分社会人口经济学特征等。采用量表的内部一致率Cronbach’s α系数和分半信度评价量表的信度；结构效度用因子分析法进行；标准效度用相关分析；区分效度用方差分析法进行。结果：①信度：简明健康状况调查表总体来讲具有较好的信度，8个分量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.56-0.95。②效度：生理功能、精神健康维度的标准效度较好；总体健康维度的标准效度尚可。简明健康状况调查表区分不同疾病严重程度、不同生活依赖程度和不同生存质量的脑卒中患者时区分效度较好。③存在问题与缺点：躯体疼痛和活力两个分量表的“系数较低，分别为0．56和0．69；精神健康和活力的结构效度分析与原设想的量表结构不吻合；生理职能（1．0版）出现了严重的“地板效应”（72．3％）。结论：简明健康状况调查表总体上有较好的信度和效度；但由于文化背景的不同和疾病、人群的特殊性，部分维度的分量表不大适合，应引起足够的重视。建议应用于类似人群时应进行修改、补充部分脑卒中特异性问题、或结合其他专用量表。     

多维疲劳量表中文版应用于飞行员的信度和效度验证

目的评价多维疲劳量表中文版的信效度。方法应用多维疲劳量表中文版对196例飞行员进行调查。结果量表每个条目与所属维度得分的相关系数均大于0.50,提取4个公因子,可以解释总变异的54.83%。量表内部一致性信度为0.872,各维度的内部一致性信度均大于0.6。结论多维疲劳量表中文版有较好的信度和效度,可用于评价飞行员的疲劳状况,但仍需进一步完善。     

精神疲劳自评量表的汉化及信度和效度检验

目的:汉化精神疲劳自评量表(MFS),分析其在脑卒中患者精神疲劳评价中的信度、效度。方法:对原英文版量表进行二人直译、回译、专家讨论评议及文化调试,最终形成中文版MFS量表。通过便利抽样的方法对295例脑卒中患者采用中文版MFS进行评价,通过内容效度指数、探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析、校标关联效度分析评价其效度,通过内部一致性及Pearson相关系数评价该量表的信度。结果:中文版的MFS量表共有15个条目,内容效度指数S-CVI在0.83—1.00之间,S-CVI/UA为0.8,S-CVI/Ave为0.966;除去最后一个条目经探索性因子分析,共提取4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为83.387%,验证性因子分析中χ~2/df=2.003、RMSEA=0.083、NFI=0.936、RFI=0.918、CFI=0.967、TLI=0.957;与疲劳严重度总分相关系数r为0.782。总量表的Cronbach α为0.932,各维度的Cronbach α为0.923—0.964,总量表的重测信度ICC为0.848,各维度的重测信度ICC为0.722—0.947。结论:中文版的MFS量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为我国脑卒中患者精神疲劳的评价工具。     

中文版脑卒中后失语症生活质量量表的信度和效度研究

目的通过对脑卒中失语症生活质量量表（SAQOL-39g）的编译和心理测量学考评,建立适合中国脑卒中后失语症患者使用的生活质量专表。 方法参考国内外量表的编译程序,将英文版脑卒中失语症生活质量量表（SAQOL-39g）编译为中文。使用中文版SAQOL-39g量表的自评和代评量表对脑卒中失语症患者86例及其陪护（代评者）86例进行问卷调查。考察量表的可行性、信度、效度及自评代评量表间的一致性。 结果中文版量表的回收率为100％,自评量表和代评量表的平均完成时间分别为（21.4±4.37）min和（13.25±5.6）min。自评和代评量表的总体和各维度内在信度指标Cronbach′s alpha系数的范围分别为0.879～0.950和0.863～0.943;自评和代评量表的总体和各维度重测信度相关系数范围分别为0.804～0.974和0.861～0.987。量表的结构效度检验使用因子分析共提取出3个公因子,累积贡献率59.7%。自评和代评量表之间的一致性好（P>0.05）。 结论中文版SAQOL-39g量表具有良好的可行性、信度、效度,自评和代评量表间的一致性好,可有效地对脑卒中后失语症患者的生活质量进行评估。     

脑卒中照顾者照护结局量表中文版的信效度研究

[目的]检验脑卒中照顾者照护结局量表（BCOS）中文版的信度和效度。[方法]引进并翻译13（20S英文版,使用BCOS中文版对147位脑卒中主要照护者进行评估。[结果]BCOS总的Cronbaeh’s a系数为0．857,重测信度总的相关系数为0．878（P〈0．00]）。内容效度指数为0．968。经分析得到4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为64．180％。BCOS与脑卒中照顾者压力量表中文版呈负相关（r=-0．319,P〈0．01）,证实了其效标关联效度。[结论]BCOS中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可行性高,可用于脑卒中主要照顾者照顾负担的测评。     

Assessment of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain. Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the MFI-20

OBJECTIVES: Fibromyalgia (FM) and Chronic Widespread Pain (CWP) are common diseases in primary care and, in addition to the pain they cause, fatigue is a major problem. Fatigue is regarded as a multidimensional concept and instruments assessing fatigue should therefore cover several different dimensions. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) measures five different dimensions of fatigue. The aim of the study was to investigate the test-retest reliability and convergent construct validity of the Swedish version of the MFI-20 in female patients with FM or CWP. METHODS: To investigate the convergent construct validity, 166 female patients with FM or CWP completed the Swedish version of the MFI-20 and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring global fatigue. Thirty-six of the 166 patients completed the Swedish version of the MFI-20 on two occasions, one day apart to evaluate the test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed a significant association between each of the five subscales of the MFI-20 and the VAS for global fatigue. General Fatigue had the highest correlation with the VAS (rs = 0.62, p < 0.001), while Reduced Motivation had the lowest (rs = 0.32, p <0.001). The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were satisfactory for all the five subscales of the MFI-20. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the Swedish version of the MFI-20 is a reliable tool for assessing the degree of fatigue in patients with FM or CWP. This study also supports the theory that fatigue is a multidimensional concept and different aspects of fatigue should be measured separately.     

Assessment of fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain. Reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the MFI-20

Objectives. Fibromyalgia (FM) and Chronic Widespread Pain (CWP) are common diseases in primary care and, in addition to the pain they cause, fatigue is a major problem. Fatigue is regarded as a multidimensional concept and instruments assessing fatigue should therefore cover several different dimensions. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) measures five different dimensions of fatigue. The aim of the study was to investigate the test-retest reliability and convergent construct validity of the Swedish version of the MFI-20 in female patients with FM or CWP.

Methods. To investigate the convergent construct validity, 166 female patients with FM or CWP completed the Swedish version of the MFI-20 and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring global fatigue. Thirty-six of the 166 patients completed the Swedish version of the MFI-20 on two occasions, one day apart to evaluate the test-retest reliability.

Results. Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed a significant association between each of the five subscales of the MFI-20 and the VAS for global fatigue. General Fatigue had the highest correlation with the VAS (rs = 0.62, p<0.001), while Reduced Motivation had the lowest (rs = 0.32, p<0.001). The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were satisfactory for all the five subscales of the MFI-20.

Conclusion. The results of this study indicate that the Swedish version of the MFI-20 is a reliable tool for assessing the degree of fatigue in patients with FM or CWP. This study also supports the theory that fatigue is a multidimensional concept and different aspects of fatigue should be measured separately.     

Validation of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 in Chinese patients with cancer

Goals of work

The purpose of this research is to study the validation of the Chinese version of Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 in measuring fatigue status of the patients with cancer in China.

Materials and methods

The original English version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 was translated into a Chinese version, which was applied to measure the fatigue status of cancer patients prior to commencing chemotherapy and during the last week of chemotherapy, respectively. The reliability and criterion-related validity of the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 were assessed by calculating Cronbach's α and Pearson correlation coefficients. The construct validity was analyzed by employing factor analysis.

Main results

There were three dimensions in the Chinese version of the MFI-20, which measures the physical, mental, and spiritual fatigue of patients with cancer. All of the correlation coefficients between EORTC QLQ-C30V3.0 and MFI-20 were statistically significant (P?α coefficient was more than 0.8 and 0.7 for total MFI-20 and for the three dimensions of the Chinese version of the MFI-20, respectively.

Conclusions

The Chinese version of the MFI-20 is a reliable and valid instrument to assess fatigue in Chinese patients with cancer.     

Dimensions of fatigue during radiotherapy

The aim of the present study was to describe fatigue in a group of irradiated cancer patients. Fatigue was assessed prospectively in 81 Swedish cancer patients, using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), which was also validated in the study, the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and a Borg CR10 scale before curative radiotherapy, at the end of therapy and 1 and 3 months after treatment. The mean age of these patients was 56 years; 90% were female; and 65% were being treated for cancer of the breast. The absorbed radiation dose was 50 Gy or lower in 90% of the patients. A clear peak in experienced fatigue according to the three scales was seen at the end of treatment. In the MFI-20 the dimensions of General fatigue, Physical fatigue and Reduced activity, were more pronounced than the aspects of Mental fatigue and Reduced motivation. Comparison with other studies using the same instrument in other irradiated patients revealed a similar pattern. The internal consistency of the Swedish version of the MFI-20 was good. The MFI-20 is shown to be a valid instrument for assessing fatigue in patients undergoing radiotherapy.     

中文版脑卒中后失语症生活质量量表的信度和效度研究

目的通过编译及心理测量学考评脑卒中失语症生活质量量表,建立脑卒中失语症适合的生活质量专用表。方法应用中文版脑卒中失语症生活质量量表(SAQOL-39g)以问卷形式对2017年1月至2019年1月我院收治的88例脑卒中失语患者及其88名陪护(代评者)进行调查,全面考察该量表信度、效度、可行性及及自评代评量表间一致性。结果量表回收率为100%,其中自评量表和代评量表平均完成时间为(21.61±4.38)min和(13.26±5.70)min。中文版SAQOL-39g Cronbach’s alpha系数内自评量表和代评量表的总体和各维度内在信度范围分别为0.881~0.946和0.884~0.941;重测信度相关系数范围分别为0.803~0.973和0.862~0.986。使用量表结构效度检验因子分析显示提取3个公因子,贡献率为59.7%。中文版SAQOL-39g中自评量表和代评量表之间具有较高一致性(P>0.05)。结论应用中文版SAQOL-39g具有较高的信度、效度及可行性,自评量表和代评量表间具有较好的一致性,可有效评估脑卒中失语症患者的生活质量。     

Validation study of the Chinese version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI-C)

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 249 Chinese cancer patients with multiple diagnoses to validate a Chinese version of the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI-C). Cronbach's coefficient alpha was 0.92 for fatigue severity items and 0.90 for fatigue interference items. Construct validity was explored by principal factor analysis and suggested a two-factor solution: fatigue severity and fatigue interference. Internal consistency reliability was excellent. Convergent validity was examined by correlating the BFI-C with 2 subscales and 2 component scores of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (coefficients ranged between -0.44 and -0.71, P<0.001). Known-group validity was examined by comparing fatigue severity in patients having different scores on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale. Approximately 60% of patients experienced moderate to severe fatigue (4 or greater on the 0-10 scale of the BFI-C "fatigue worst" item). The BFI-C is a valid, reliable instrument to measure the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue among Chinese patients.     

医院患者安全文化调查问卷中文版信效度检验

目的：测量中文版医院患者安全文化调查问卷（ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture , HSOPSC）在临床医务人员使用的信效度,并进一步验证其在我国文化文化背景下的适用性。方法采用便利抽样,从北京市4家三级综合医院抽取422名临床医务工作者,通过问卷及各个维度的Cronbach ’ sα对问卷的内部一致性信度进行测评。间隔2周重新使用中文版HSOPSC对20名受试者进行测评,考察其重测信度。分别通过专家判断法和探索性因子分析对问卷的内容效度和结构效度进行测评。结果中文版HSOPSC总的Cronbach’sα系数为0．892,重测与首次测量总分的相关系数为0．854（P＜0．001）。与原版问卷相比中文版HSOPSC减少了一个因子,经过探索性因子分析共提取出11个公因子,11个公因子的累计贡献率为63．167％。结论中文版HSOPSC具好非常好的信度和可接受的效度。可用于我国临床医务人员患者安全文化的测评。     

恐动症成因分析量表的汉化及信效度检验

目的对恐动症成因分析量表(kinesiophobia causes scale,KCS)汉化并进行信效度检验,评价其在我国相关领域应用的可行性。方法依据量表翻译方法对KCS进行翻译、文化调试,形成中文版KCS。便利抽样选择杭州市2所三级甲等医院疼痛门诊的慢性下腰痛患者231例作为测试对象,检验量表内部一致性;成立专家小组,验证量表的内容效度。结果中文版KCS的Cronbach’s α系数为0.869,折半信度为0.715,重测信度为0.940,内容效度为0.850,20个条目的内容效度指数高于0.800。探索性因子分析共提取7个公因子,解释方差贡献率为80.343%。结论中文版KCS具有较好的信度、效度和区分能力,可作为我国评价、分析恐动症成因的有效工具。