The component separation technique for hernia repair: a comparison of open and endoscopic techniques

The open components separation technique (CST) for hernia repair allows for autologous tissue repair with approximation of the midline fascia in patients with complex hernias. CST requires creation of large undermining skin flaps, whereas the endoscopic component separation technique (ECST) is performed without division of the epigastric perforating vessels and may minimize wound morbidity. A review of patient demographics and outcome measures of patients undergoing CST and ECST between November 2008 and February 2010 was performed. Twenty-five patients were identified who underwent either CST (14 patients) or ECST (11 patients). There were no differences in body mass index (CST 34.8 kg/m(2), ECST 37.5 kg/m(2), P = 0.45), operating room times (CST 268 minutes, ECST 252 minutes, P = 0.54), or hospital length of stay (CST 5 days, ECST 5.8 days, P = 0.78). Wound complications occurred less with ECST (9 vs 57%, P = 0.03). The time to resolution of wound complications in ECST was reduced *1 vs 4 months). No recurrences were seen in either group with a mean follow-up of 4months (range, 1 to 12 months). ECST and CST require similar operative times and hospital lengths of stay. ECST is associated with reduced wound complications compared with CST. Short-term recurrence rates with CST and ECST are comparable.     

Comparison of open and laparoscopic prosthetic repair of large ventral hernias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Open ventral hernia repair is associated with significant morbidity and high recurrence rates. Recently, the laparoscopic approach has evolved as an attractive alternative. Our objective was to compare open with laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. METHODS: Fifty laparoscopic and 22 open ventral hernia repairs were included in the study. All patients underwent a tension-free repair with retromuscular placement of the prosthesis. No significant difference between the 2 groups was noted regarding patient demographics and hernia characteristics except that the population in the open group was relatively older (59.4 vs 47.82, P < 0.003). RESULTS: We found no significant difference in the operative time between the 2 groups (laparoscopic 132.7 min vs open 152.7 min). Laparoscopic repair was associated with a significant reduction in the postoperative narcotic requirements (27 vs 58.95 mg i.v. morphine, P < 0.002) and the lengths of nothing by mouth (NPO) status (10 vs 55.3 hrs. P < 0.001), and hospital stay (1.88 vs 5.38 days, P < 0.001). The incidence of major complications (1 vs 4, P < 0.028), the hernia recurrence (1 vs 4, P < 0.028), and the time required for return to work (25.95 vs 47.8, P < 0.036) were significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ventral hernioplasty offers significant advantages and should be considered for repair of primary and incisional ventral hernias.     

A comparative analysis between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair at a tertiary care center

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair reportedly yields lower postoperative complications than open repair. We hypothesized that patients undergoing laparoscopic repair would have lower postoperative infectious outcomes. Also, certain preoperative patient characteristics and preoperative hernia characteristics are hypothesized to increase complication risk in both groups. All ventral hernia repairs performed at University of Virginia from January 2004 to January 2006 were reviewed. Primary outcomes included wound healing complications and hernia recurrence. Categorical data were analyzed with χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests. Continuous variables were evaluated with independent t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. A total of 268 repairs (110 open, 158 laparoscopic) were evaluated. Patient and hernia characteristics were similar between groups, though the percents of wound contamination (5.4% vs 0.6%; P = 0.02) and simultaneous surgery (7.2% vs 0%; P = 0.001) were greater in the open procedures. Univariate analysis also revealed that open cases had a greater incidence of postoperative superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (30.0% vs 10.7%; P < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed that both diabetes and open repair were associated with an increased risk of superficial SSI (P = 0.019; odds ratio = 3.512; 95% confidence interval = 1.229-10.037 and P = 0.001; odds ratio = 4.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.9-11.2, respectively). Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair yielded lower rates of postoperative superficial SSI than open surgery. Other preoperative patient characteristics and preoperative hernia characteristics, with the exception of diabetes, were not found to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.     

Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years' experience with 850 consecutive hernias

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The recurrence rate after standard repair of ventral hernias may be as high as 12-52%, and the wide surgical dissection required often results in wound complications. Use of a laparoscopic approach may decrease rates of complications and recurrence after ventral hernia repair. METHODS: Data on all patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) performed by 4 surgeons using a standardized procedure between November 1993 and October 2002 were collected prospectively (85% of patients) or retrospectively. RESULTS: LVHR was completed in 819 of the 850 patients (422 men; 428 women) in whom it was attempted. Thirty-four percent of completed LVHRs were for recurrent hernias. The patient mean body mass index was 32; the mean defect size was 118 cm2. Mesh, averaging 344 cm2, was used in all cases. Mean operating time was 120 min, mean estimated blood loss was 49 mL, and hospital stay averaged 2.3 days. There were 128 complications in 112 patients (13.2%). One patient died of a myocardial infarction. The most common complications were ileus (3%) and prolonged seroma (2.6%). During a mean follow-up time of 20.2 months (range, 1-94 months), the hernia recurrence rate was 4.7%. Recurrence was associated with large defects, obesity, previous open repairs, and perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: In this large series, LVHR had a low rate of conversion to open surgery, a short hospital stay, a moderate complication rate, and a low risk of recurrence.     

Comparison of Bassini repair and mesh-plug repair for primary inguinal hernia: a retrospective study

The purpose of this study was to compare the mesh-plug repair with the Bassini repair for the treatment of primary unilateral inguinal hernias. Patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernias who underwent a Bassini repair (n = 118) between January 1992 and May 1996 and a mesh-plug repair (n = 113) between July 1996 and April 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. We recorded information regarding the types of hernia according to Nyhus classification, operation time, complications, postoperative recovery, and recurrence after surgery. The two groups were comparable regarding age, sex, side of hernia, types of hernia, and the follow-up interval. The operation time was 55 +/- 20min for Bassini repair and 54 +/- 18min for mesh-plug repair. There was no incidence of mesh infection in the mesh-plug repair cases. The amount of diclofenac sodium (suppository) was 307 +/- 222mg in the Bassini repair group and 132 +/- 182mg in the mesh-plug repair group (P < 0.0001). The length of hospital stay was 8.2 +/- 2.0 days in the Bassini repair group and 4.3 +/- 2.7 days in the mesh-plug repair group (P < 0.01). Nine patients (7.6%) in the Bassini repair group had recurrence, compared with one patient (0.9%) in the mesh-plug repair group. The recurrence-free survival in the mesh-plug repair group was significantly longer than that in the Bassini repair group (P = 0.03). In conclusion, patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernias who undergo a mesh-plug repair recover more rapidly and have less recurrence in comparison with those who undergo a Bassini repair.     

Ventral Hernia Repair in Bariatric Surgery

Background: Obesity is an important risk factor for perioperative complications including the development of ventral hernias. Methods: This retrospective study comprises patients who underwent abdominal hernia repair simultaneously with or following implantation of a Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band? (SAGB). Results: 9 out of 415 patients (2.2%) who received a SAGB between January 1996 and June 2001 underwent ventral hernia repair. In 6 patients, hernias preexisted from previous abdominal surgery at the time of the bariatric procedure, and another 3 hernias occurred at the median and left upper abdominal trocar position following SAGB placement. Median BMI at time of SAGB implantation was 44 (range 35-52), and at time of hernia repair was 36 (range 25-46). 2 hernias were repaired during SAGB placement, 3 during redo surgery, and 2 during abdominoplasty. In 2 patients, significant weight loss with loss of soft tissue support of the hernia sac led to recurrent episodes of small bowel obstruction necessitating emergency repair. Repair included direct defect closure in 7 patients and sublay polypropylene net implantation in 2 patients. Recoveries have been uneventful without wound infections or recurrence in all patients after a median follow-up of 34 months (range 13-69). Conclusion: In morbidly obese patients, the optimal management and timing of incisional hernia repair should weigh the risk of recurrence and perioperative complications against the risk of hernia-associated complications.     

A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs

Background: Although ventral hernia repair is increasingly performed laparoscopically, complication rates with this procedure are not well characterized. For this reason, we performed a prospective study comparing early outcomes after laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Methods: We identified all the patients undergoing ventral (including incisional) hernia repair at a single tertiary care center between September 1, 1999 and July 1, 2001 (overall n = 257). To increase the homogeneity of the sample, we excluded umbilical hernia repairs, parastomal hernia repairs, nonelective procedures, procedures not involving mesh, and repairs performed concurrently with another surgical procedure. Postoperative complications (in-hospital or within 30-days) were assessed prospectively according to standardized definitions by trained nurse clinicians. Results: Of the 136 ventral hernia repairs that met the study criteria, 65 (48%) were laparoscopic repairs (including 3 conversions to open surgery) and 71 (52%) were open repairs. The patients in the laparoscopic group were more likely to have undergone a prior (failed) ventral hernia repair (40% vs 27%; p = 0.14), but other patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. Overall, fewer complications were experienced by patients undergoing laparoscopic repair (8% vs 21%; p = 0.03). The higher complication rate in the open ventral hernia repair group came from wound infections (8%) and postoperative ileus (4%), neither of which was observed in the patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. The laparoscopic group had longer operating room times (2.2 vs 1.7 h; p = 0.001), and there was a nonsignificant trend toward shorter hospital stays with laparoscopic repair (1.1 vs 1.5 days; p = 0.10). Conclusions: The patients undergoing laparoscopic repair had fewer postoperative complications than those receiving open repair. Wound infections and postoperative ileus accounted for the higher complication rates in the open ventral hernia repair group. Otherwise, these groups were very similar. Long-term studies assessing hernia recurrence rates will be required to help determine the optimal approach to ventral hernia repair. Drs. Birkmeyer and Finlayson were supported by Career Development Awards from the VA Health Services Research and Development program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.     

Subxiphoid incisional hernias after median sternotomy

BACKGROUND: Subxiphoid hernias are difficult to repair. This study attempts to identify risk factors associated with incisional hernia formation after median sternotomy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing subxiphoid incisional hernia repair between 1995 and 2002. The study group was compared with a group undergoing similar cardiothoracic procedures as to body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, complications, tobacco use, length of stay, ICU stay, bypass time, transfusion requirements, and wound infections. Statistical analysis utilized Student's t-test, chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 117 subxiphoid hernias were repaired; 45 were used for comparison with a matched cohort of 79 patients. Average time between sternotomy and hernia repair was 24.3 months (+/-16.8) with 22 (49%) patients developing hernias within 2 years. Mean followup was 48 months. The study group differed significantly from the nonhernia group in age (56.6 +/- 13.0 versus 62.2 +/- 8.9, p = 0.01), mean length of stay (16.3 +/- 22.8 versus 10.2 +/- 6.7, p = 0.03), BMI (29.6 +/- 4.5 versus 27.2 +/- 4.5, p = 0.01), number of transplantation patients (10 versus 1, p = 0.0003), and presence of sternal wound infection (18% versus 3.9%, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed significance in regard to transfusion requirements (p = 0.015) and approached statistical significance with BMI (p = 0.058). Of the 45 patients undergoing hernia repair, 31(69%) had a mesh repair and 10 (32%) patients recurred. Six (43%) patients without a mesh repair recurred. Seventy-five percent of the patients with sternal wound infections developed recurrent hernias. CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion requirements, BMI, and sternal wound infections might be associated with subxiphoid hernias after median sternotomy. Sternal wound infection increases the risk of recurrent incisional hernia.     

Medium-term follow-up confirms the safety and durability of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with PTFE

BACKGROUND: Ventral abdominal wall hernias are common lesions and may be associated with life-threatening complications. The application of laparoscopic principles to the treatment of ventral hernias has reduced recurrence rates from a range of 25% to 52% to a range of 3.4% to 9%. In this study, we review our experience and assess the clinical outcome of patients who have undergone laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias. METHODS: We reviewed the outcome of 79 patients with more than 1 year of follow-up who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair between March 1996 and December 2001. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative parameters, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 79 patients, 37 were males. Mean age was 55.8 years (range 28-81). Sixty-eight patients had incisional hernias, including 17 with recurrent hernias. Eleven patients had primary ventral hernias. The mean defect size was 103 cm(2) (range 4-510); incarceration was present in 22 patients (27.8%), and multiple (Swiss-cheese) defects in 20 (25.3%). Laparoscopic expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh repair by the modified Rives-Stoppa technique was completed in 78 (98.7%). One conversion occurred because of bowel injury. The mean operating time was 110 minutes (range 45-210) and mean hospital stay was 1.7 days (range 0-20), with 46 patients (58.2%) being discharged within 24 hours of surgery. Complications included seroma formation (3), chronic pain (3), prolonged ileus (1), hematoma formation (1), and missed bowel injury (1) for a complication rate of (11.4%). There were no deaths. After a follow-up of up to 6 years (a mean of 34 months), there were 4 recurrences (5%). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias is safe, effective, and durable with minimal morbidity. It is particularly successful in patients with recurrent lesions. The laparoscopic approach to ventral hernia repair should be considered the standard of care.     

The feasibility of adopting laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in general surgery practice: early outcomes in an unselected series of patients

A laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia repair has been shown to be safe and effective in selected patients. We report our early outcomes following laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVHR) in an unselected series of patients encountered in general surgery practice. All patients referred with incisional hernia were offered a laparoscopic repair using prosthetic mesh. Patients were not excluded from laparoscopic approach on the basis of age, previous surgery, defect size, intraperitoneal mesh, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, or abdominal wall stomas. We followed 28 consecutive patients who underwent LVHR (17 primary, 11 recurrent hernias). Laparoscopic repair was completed in 27 patients with a mean operative time of 141.6 +/- 11.9 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean size of the abdominal wall defects was 153.4 +/- 27.5 cm and the mean mesh size was 349.2 +/- 59.1 cm. The mean hospital stay was 3.7 +/- 0.3 days. Nine patients developed large wound seromas; all spontaneously resolved. Our experience suggests that LVHR is feasible as a primary approach to most incisional hernias encountered in general surgery practice.     

Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia

HYPOTHESIS: A bioabsorbable tissue scaffold of porcine submucosal small intestine extracellular matrix (Surgisis Gold [SIS]; Cook Biotech Inc, West Lafayette, Ind) mesh is safe and effective for ventral hernia repair. DESIGN: Retrospective case series at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-three consecutive patients having 8-ply SIS mesh repair of ventral abdominal hernias. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Early complications, reoperation, hernia recurrence, mesh or wound infection, or reaction. Outcomes reported and compared on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Patients were stratified by wound class: clean, clean-contaminated and contaminated, or dirty. Median follow-up was 14 months (range, 2-29 months) during which there were 22 complications (41%), 17 early reoperations (32%), 13 partial dehiscences (21%), 6 mesh reactions (11%), and 9 recurrent hernias (17%). Seven recurrent hernias (78%) in critically ill, patients with dirty wounds had the SIS mesh removed owing to infection or reoperation. In patients without SIS mesh removal or debridement, 1 (2.2%) of 44 developed a recurrent hernia at 6 months. Patients with dirty wounds were more likely to need early reoperation (P<.001), develop a complication (P<.01), partial wound dehiscence (P<.05), or recurrent hernia (P<.01) compared with patients with clean wounds. Critically ill patients were more likely to have hernia recurrence (P<.05), early reoperation (P<.001), and postoperative complications (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Eight-ply SIS mesh is safe in clean and clean-contaminated hernia repair with satisfactory short-term outcomes. However, delayed wound infection, repeated operation, and mesh debridement warrant cautious use of SIS mesh in critically ill patients and those with dirty wounds.     

Polyester composite versus PTFE in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Introduction:

Both polyester composite (POC) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh are commonly used for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. However, sparse information exists comparing perioperative and long-term outcome by mesh repair.

Methods:

A prospective database was utilized to identify 116 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at The Mount Sinai Hospital from 2004-2009. Patients were grouped by type of mesh used, PTFE versus POC, and retrospectively compared. Follow-up at a mean of 12 months was achieved by telephone interview and office visit.

Results:

Of the 116 patients, 66 underwent ventral hernia repair with PTFE and 50 with POC mesh. Patients were well matched by patient demographics. No difference in mean body mass index (BMI) was demonstrated between the PTFE and POC group (31.8 vs. 32.5, respectively; P=NS). Operative time was significantly longer in the PTFE group (136 vs.106 minutes, P<.002). Two perioperative wound infections occurred in the PTFE group and none in the POC group (P=NS). No other major complications occurred in the immediate postoperative period (30 days). At a mean follow-up of 12 months, no significant difference was demonstrated between the PTFE and POC groups in hernia recurrence (3% vs. 2%), wound complications (1% vs. 0%), mesh infection, requiring removal (3% vs. 0%), bowel obstruction (3% vs. 2%), or persistent pain or discomfort (28% vs. 32%), respectively (P=NS).

Conclusion:

Our study demonstrated no significant association between types of mesh used and postoperative complications. In the 12-month follow-up, no differences were noted in hernia recurrence.     

Modified components separation technique: experience treating large,complex ventral hernias at a University Hospital

Background

An increasing number of patients have large or complex abdominal wall defects. Component separation technique (CST) is a very effective method for reconstructing complex midline abdominal wall defects in a manner that restores innervated muscle function without excessive tension. Our goal is to show our results by a modified CST for treating large ventral hernias.

Materials and methods

A total of 351 patients with complex ventral hernias have been treated over a 10-year period. Pre- and postoperative CT scans were performed in all patients. All ventral hernias were W3, according to the EHS classification 1. We analyzed demographic variables, co-morbidities, hernia characteristics, operative, and postoperative variables.

Results

One hundred and seventy patients (48.4%) were men; the average age of the study population was 51.6 ± 23.2 years with an average BMI of 32.3 ± 1.3. The hernia was located in the midline in 321 cases (91.5%) versus the flank in 30 (8.5%). In 45 patients, preoperative botulinum toxin (BT) and progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) were needed due to giant hernia defects when the VIH/VAC ratio was >20%. Postoperative complications related to the surgical site were seroma (35.1%), hematoma (9.1%), infection (7.2%), and wound necrosis (8.8%). Complications related to the repair were evisceration in 3 patients (1.1%), small bowel fistula in 4 patients (1.5%), 11 cases of mesh infection (2.9%), and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in 2 patients. There were 29 hernia recurrences (8.2%) with a mean follow-up of 31.6 ± 8.1 months.

Conclusion

The modified CST is an effective strategy for managing complex ventral hernias that enables primary fascial closure with low rates of morbidity and hernia recurrence.

     

Progressive fascial wound failure impairs subsequent abdominal wall repairs: a new animal model of incisional hernia formation

BACKGROUND: Fascial wound failure alters the phenotype of the abdominal wall. This study introduces a novel animal model of progressive failure of the ventral abdominal wall fascia, which generates large incisional hernias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A mechanistic model of incisional hernia was compared with a model of acute myofascial defect hernia repair. Using biological tissue repair markers, tensiometric measurements and recurrent hernia rate, we measured the mechanism by which incisional hernias regenerate abdominal wall structure and function after mesh and suture herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Recurrent incisional hernia formation was significantly increased after repairs of the hernia model, compared with the myofascial defect model (6/16 vs 0/16, P < .05). In the hernia model, there were significant decreases in the recovery of wound strength, energy, and extensibility before mechanical disruption, compared with the myofascial defect model. Unexpectedly, excision of fascial hernia wound edges did not significantly improve tissue repair outcomes in the hernia model group. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically accurate animal modeling can recreate the wound pathology expressed in mature incisional hernias. Progressive fascial wound failure decreases the fidelity of subsequent incisional hernia repair, compared with identically sized acute abdominal wall defect repairs. The mechanism appears to include decreased fascial wound strength and decreased tissue compliance after herniorrhaphy.     

Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic techniques are being used increasingly in the repair of ventral hernias and offer the potential benefits of a shorter hospital stay, decreased wound complications, and possibly a lower recurrence rate. Despite good results from high-volume centers, significant complications may occur with this approach and the morbidity of incisional hernia repair may be underestimated. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) since its inception at our institution. METHODS: Medical records of all patients who underwent LVHR at a single institution from May 2000 through December 2003 were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative variables including complications were analyzed. Follow-up evaluation was by office visit and phone survey with assessment of patient satisfaction scores. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD. RESULTS: A total of 121 LVHR were performed in 116 patients (52 men, 64 women; mean age, 57 +/- 13 y; mean body mass index, 35 +/- 8). Hernias were recurrent in 35 cases (28.9%), with a mean of 1.4 prior repairs (range, 1-7). The mean defect size was 109 +/- 126 cm2 and the average mesh size used was 256 +/- 192 cm2. Operating time was 147 +/- 45 minutes, and the hospital stay averaged 1.7 +/- 1 days. Twelve cases (9.9%) were converted to open operation, most commonly because of extensive adhesions. Extensive laparoscopic adhesiolysis was necessary in 29 cases (26.6%). Overall, perioperative complications occurred in 33 cases (27.3%), 13 of which (39.3%) were persistent seromas. Major complications were seen in 9 cases (7.4%). There were 4 enterotomies (3.3%): 3 occurred as a result of adhesiolysis and 1 resulted from a trocar injury; 2 were detected intraoperatively and were converted to open operation and 2 presented postoperatively. One of these patients developed sepsis and died. Follow-up evaluation was available for 83.6% of cases at a mean interval of 22 +/- 16 months after repair. The hernia recurrence rate was 9.3% (9 cases) and was detected at a median of 6 months postoperatively. The overall patient satisfaction score was high at 4.3 +/- 1.1 (scale, 1-5). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair is effective for the vast majority of patients with primary or recurrent ventral hernias and results in hernia recurrence rates of less than 10%, with high patient satisfaction scores. Although seroma is the most common complication, major morbidity occurred in 7.4% of the patients in our series. Enterotomy is the most common serious complication and may result in sepsis and death.     

Laparoscopic tension-free repair of anterior abdominal wall incisional and ventral hernias with an intraperitoneal Gore-Tex mesh: prospective study and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Recurrence rates after repair of incisional and ventral hernias range from 18% to 52%. Prosthetic open repair has decreased this rate, but the wide fascial dissection it requires increases the complication rate. Laparoscopic repair is a safe and effective alternative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed including 86 patients (63 women and 23 men) with a mean age of 54 years (range 29-79 years) having incisional or ventral hernias who underwent laparoscopic repair in our institution between July 1994 and October 2001. The majority of the patients were obese with a mean body mass index of 31.7 kg/m2. The abdominal wall defect size ranged from 2 X 1 cm to 20 X 13 cm. In all cases, a Gore-Tex mesh (Dual Mesh, W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) was used in sizes ranging from 10 X 15 cm to 20 X 30 cm. RESULTS: Nineteen repairs were performed for recurrent hernias (12 incisional and 7 ventral). The mean operative time was 110.3 minutes (range 50-240 minutes). There was one open conversion (1.2%), one intraoperative complication (1.2%), and no deaths. There were no wound or mesh infections. Immediate postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients (10.6%) and late complications occurred in 16 patients (18.8%). The average hospital stay was 4.8 days (range 2-19 days). During a mean follow-up of 37 months (range 6-73 months), there were 6 hernia recurrences (7%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia and ventral hernia appears to be safe, especially with the use of Gore-Tex mesh, and is proving to be effective as it decreases pain, complications, hospital stay, and recurrences.     

The internal retention repair of massive ventral hernia

We report the results of a new method of primary repair of massive ventral hernia in 409 patients using internal retention sutures. Notably, 40 per cent of these patients had failed Marlex mesh repairs. The mean transverse diameter of their hernial defects was 10.4 +/- 0.7 cm (range, 4-18 cm). The overall recurrence rate was 2.5 per cent, superior to other methods of primary repair, and equal or superior to Marlex mesh repair. Wound infection occurred in 5 per cent. The risk of wound infection was significantly increased (P less than 0.05) in patients with a history of prior wound infection. We conclude that the internal retention method of primary repair of ventral hernia for defects less than 18 cm in diameter is equal to Marlex in the repair of previously infected recurrent hernias of this size.     

Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression?

BACKGROUND: The most common surgical complication after a kidney transplant is likely related to the wound. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, wound complications (e.g., infections, hernias) in kidney recipients and to assess whether newer immunosuppressive drugs increase the risk for such complications. METHODS: Between January 1, 1984 and September 30, 1998, we performed 2013 adult kidney transplants. Of these 2013 recipients, 97 (4.8%) developed either a superficial or a deep wound infection. Additionally, 73 (3.6%) recipients developed either a fascial dehiscence or a hernia of the wound. We used univariate and multivariate techniques to determine significant risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS: Mean time to development of a superficial infection (defined as located above the fascia) was 11.9 days posttransplant; to development of a deep infection (defined as located below the fascia), 39.2 days; and to development of a hernia or fascial dehiscence, 12.8 months. By multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factor for a superficial or deep wound infection was obesity (defined as body mass index>30 kg/m2) (RR=4.4, P=0.0001). Other significant risk factors were a urine leak posttransplant, any reoperation through the transplant incision, diabetes, and the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=2.43, P=0.0001). Significant risk factors for a hernia or fascial dehiscence were any reoperation through the transplant incision, increased recipient age, obesity, and the use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=3.54, P=0.0004). Use of antibody induction and treatment for acute rejection were not significant risk factors for either infections or hernias. Death-censored graft survival was lower in recipients who developed a wound infection (vs. those who did not); it was not lower in recipients who developed an incisional hernia or facial dehiscence (vs. those who did not). CONCLUSIONS: Despite immunosuppression including chronic steroids, the incidence of wound infections, incisional hernias, and fascial dehiscence is low in kidney recipients. As with other types of surgery, the main risk factors for postoperative complications are obesity, reoperation, and increased age. However, in kidney recipients, use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) is an additional risk factor -one that potentially could be altered, especially in high-risk recipients.     

The use of the Kugel mesh in ventral hernia repairs

BACKGROUND: The management of ventral hernias is a common problem. Goals of hernia repair include reduction of the contents, reperitonealization of the abdomen, repair of the fascial defect, and restoration of the normal abdominal wall contour. Repairs frequently require the use of mesh to reduce the incidence of recurrence. A variety of repair techniques have been described, often associated with significant pain, prolonged recovery, and complications. METHODS: We describe a technique using a partial component separation, reperitonealization of the abdominal cavity with the hernia sack, and insertion of the Kugel mesh for bridging the gap. RESULTS: We have used this technique on 65 ventral hernias. Fifty-two patients went home from the recovery room and 11 stayed less than 23 hours. One patient had a wound infection and 2 had seromas. There have been no recurrences to date. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of ventral hernias with the Kugel mesh using a partial component separation is safe, effective and durable.     

Open versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal on-lay mesh repair: A comparison of outcomes in small ventral hernia

PurposeThe ideal surgical treatment of small ventral hernias (defect less than 4 cm) is still debatable. In our study, we sought to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal on-lay mesh (IPOM) repair in small ventral hernias.MethodsPatients with a single ventral hernia defect of less than 4 cm undergoing surgical mesh repair between January 2016 and September 2018 were prospectively registered for this study. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months. Patient demographics, operative findings and regular post-operative follow-up details including recurrence rates and complications were recorded and analysed.Results41 patients underwent laparoscopic IPOM repair and 47 patients underwent open IPOM repair. The mean age for both groups is similar with no significant difference. The mean hernia defect size for the laparoscopic group is 2.8 cm (±0.8) whereas the mean hernia defect size for the open repair group is 2.1 cm (±0.4). The mean surgery duration for open IPOM repair was significantly shorter (59 min (±17) vs 74 min (±26); p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of seroma formation and surgical site infections post-operatively. There was also no significant difference in both groups in terms of chronic pain and recurrence at 1-year follow-up.ConclusionOpen IPOM repair for small ventral hernias may be superior to laparoscopic IPOM repair due to the shorter operative duration, single incision, and no additional risk of port-site hernias. There was no difference in chronic pain, wound infection and recurrence rate between the two groups.