Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal masses

To determine whether the approach for partial nephrectomy is influenced by tumor complexity and if the introduction of robotic techniques has allowed us to treat more complex tumors minimally invasively. Data from 292 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for renal masses from November 1999 to July 2013 at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively reviewed. Nephrometry scores and perioperative outcomes were stratified based on when robotic techniques were introduced. Mean follow-up time was 2.6 years. Preoperative RENAL nephrometry scores and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Of the 292 patients, 31.5 % underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, 46.2 % laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and 22.9 % open partial nephrectomy. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy mean nephrometry score was significantly higher than laparoscopic and equivalent to open. Significant perioperative differences were estimated blood loss (p = 0.0001), length of stay (p = 0.0001) and Clavien score (p = 0.0069), all favoring robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Limitations include retrospective design and single center data. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is a safe and effective surgical modality that allows for complex renal tumors that were previously reserved for open partial nephrectomy in the pure laparoscopic era to be managed with a minimally invasive approach.     

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors

Abstract Background and Purpose: Considering the potential impact of warm ischemia time (WIT) on renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), many techniques that reduce or eliminate WIT have been studied. We present our institutional experience and progression using one such technique-off-clamp RAPN-as well as the results of this technique in the management of complex cases. Patients and Methods: A retrospective chart review of 65 patients undergoing off-clamp RAPN was performed, 15 of whom underwent off-clamp RAPN for 26 complex tumors. Complex features included hilar location, completely endophytic growth, and ipsilateral multifocality. In all cases, hilar vessels were dissected but not clamped. Results: Mean tumor size was 2.5?cm (standard deviation; [SD]=1.4), while mean nephrometry score was 8.7 (SD=1.5). One (7%) intraoperative complication occurred. Mean estimated blood loss was 403?mL (SD=381), mean operative time was 190 minutes (SD=68), and WIT was 0 minutes in all cases. Mean length of stay was 1.8 days (SD=0.9), with one patient needing a postoperative blood transfusion (Clavien II complication). Final pathology results demonstrated clear-cell carcinoma (n=16), papillary carcinoma (n=4), angiomyolipoma (n=1), oncocytoma (n=2), and cystic nephroma (n=3). Margins were negative for tumor for 96% (25/26) of resected masses. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased by an average of 3.1?mL/min/1.73m(2) (SD=9.8, P=0.24), at a mean follow-up of 177 days (SD=296). Five patients with radiographic follow-up of at least 6 months have no evidence of disease recurrence. Conclusions: Off-clamp RAPN can be safely and effectively performed even in the case of complex tumors, but occurs with higher estimated blood loss. Minimal changes in eGFR were experienced by patients undergoing off-clamp RAPN at an average follow-up of roughly 6 months. Longer follow-up and direct comparison with conventional clamped RAPN technique are needed to establish the efficacy of off-clamp RAPN in complex cases.     

Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison with a long-term follow-up

Objectives

To compare the surgical, functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) or open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for moderately or highly complex tumors (RENAL nephrometry score ≥7).

Methods

A retrospective, matched-pair analysis was performed for 380 patients who underwent either RPN (n = 190) or OPN (n = 190) for a complex renal mass in different institutions. Surgical data, pathological variables, complications and functional and oncological outcomes were reviewed.

Results

RPN is associated with less estimated blood loss (EBL) (196.8 vs 240.8 ml; p < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (7.8 vs 9.2 days; p < 0.001) and lower rate of postoperative complications (15.8 vs 28.9 %; p = 0.002). Patients undergoing RPN required more direct cost. In multivariable models, surgical approach was the significant predictor for the occurrence of postoperative minor complications and postoperative wound pain. Median follow-up for RPN and OPN was 49 months and 52 months, respectively. The decline of estimated glomerular filtration at the last available follow-up (RPN: 8.7 %; OPN: 10 %) was similar (p = 0.125). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 95.1 % for RPN and 92.7 % for OPN (p = 0.48).

Conclusions

RPN provides acceptable and comparable results in terms of perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes compared to OPN for complex renal tumors with RENAL score ≥7. Moreover, RPN is a less invasive approach with the benefit of shorter length of hospital stay, less EBL and lower rate of postoperative complications.

     

Margin and complication rates in clampless partial nephrectomy: a comparison of open,laparoscopic and robotic surgeries

In performing partial nephrectomy (PN), surgeons focus on complete removal of tumor, preservation of renal function, the absence of major perioperative complications, expressed by the formula margin, ischemia and complication (MIC). The aim of current study was to perform a single-institution comparison of clampless open (OPN), laparoscopic (LPN) or robot-assisted (RAPN) PN as well as to evaluate pre-, intra- and postoperative factors that may influence achievement of ideal MIC. All consecutive clampless OPN, LPN or RAPN performed by experienced surgeons between 2006 and 2015 were included in the analysis. MIC was defined as negative surgical margin plus zero-ischemia plus absence of any grade ≥3 complications according to Clavien–Dindo classification. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to predict the MIC. Odds ratios with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated. 80 patients underwent OPN, 66 LPN and 31 RAPN, and both groups had similar characteristics. The MIC rate was 67.5, 86.3 and 83.3 % in the OPN, LPN and RAPN groups, respectively (p = 0.016). At logistic regression analysis, surgical approach (p = 0.03) and operative time (p = 0.008) were independent predictors of the MIC rate. When stratified according to the surgical approach, preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical classification (PADUA) score, LPN, RAPN and operative time were independent predictors of MIC rate (p = 0.0488, p = 0.0494, p = 0.0479 and p = 0.0108, respectively). Clampless LPN and RAPN have an efficacy and safety profile that is on par with OPN, offering the additional benefits of a reduced operative time, blood loss, on demand ischemia and rate of high-grade complications.     

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: initial washington university experience

Abstract Background and Purpose: Because of the impact warm ischemia time may have on renal function, various surgical techniques have been proposed to minimize or eliminate warm ischemia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate our initial renal functional outcomes of off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), while assessing the safety profile of this unconventional surgical approach. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of our off-clamp RAPN experience between August 2007 and January 2012. All patients with baseline and postoperative serum creatinine determinations were included. Patient demographics, operative information, perioperative outcomes, and renal functional outcomes were evaluated for this cohort. Results: Forty-two patients with a mean age of 59.9 years (standard deviation [SD]=12) had a median follow-up of 100 days (range 1-1007 days). In all cases, warm ischemia time was 0 minutes. Mean operative time was 143 minutes (SD=59), and median estimated blood loss was 138?mL (range 50-1500?mL). No intraoperative complications were encountered, and all surgical margins were negative. Our postoperative complication rate was 14.3%. At the most recent follow-up, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 76.2?mL/min/1.73?m(2) (SD=27.6), compared with 78.5?mL/min/1.73?m(2) (SD=28.9) preoperatively (P=0.11). Therefore, the mean eGFR decline of 2.3?mL/min/1.73?m(2) (SD=9.1) was not significant. Conclusions: Off-clamp RAPN is associated with minimal morbidity and minimal decline in renal function on short-term follow-up. Further studies and continued monitoring of renal function are needed to determine if off-clamp RAPN provides any advantage in renal function preservation relative to the traditional RAPN with vascular clamping.     

Comparison of functional outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a multicenter study

Background

We compared renal functional outcomes of robotic (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a definite indication for nephron-sparing surgery.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective analysis of OPN and RPN in patients with baseline ≥?CKD Stage III [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <?60 mL/min/1.73 m²] was performed. Primary outcome was change in eGFR (ΔeGFR, mL/min/1.73 m²) between preoperative and last follow-up with respect to RENAL nephrometry score group [simple (4–6), intermediate (7–9), complex (10–12)]. Secondary outcomes included eGFR decline >?50%.

Results

728 patients (426 OPN, 302 RPN, mean follow-up 33.3 months) were analyzed. Similar RENAL score distribution (p?=?0.148) was noted between groups. RPN had lower median estimated blood loss (p?<?0.001), and hospital stay (3 vs. 5 days, p?<?0.001). Median ischemia time (OPN 23.7 vs. RPN 21.5 min, p?=?0.089), positive margin (p?=?0.256), transfusion (p?=?0.166), and 30-day complications (p?=?0.208) were similar. For OPN vs. RPN, mean ΔeGFR demonstrated no significant difference for simple (0.5 vs. 0.3, p?=?0.328), intermediate (2.1 vs. 2.1, p?=?0.384), and complex (4.9 vs. 6.1, p?=?0.108). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that decreasing preoperative eGFR (OR 1.10, p?=?0.001) and complex RENAL score (OR 5.61, p?=?0.03) were independent predictors for eGFR decline >?50%. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated 5-year freedom from eGFR decline >?50% of 88.6% for OPN and 88.3% for RPN (p?=?0.724).

Conclusions

RPN and OPN demonstrated similar renal functional outcomes when stratified by tumor complexity group. Increasing tumor age and tumor complexity were primary drivers associated with functional decline. RPN provides similar renal functional outcomes to OPN in appropriately selected patients.

     

Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a single laparoscopic trained surgeon’s experience in the development of a robotic partial nephrectomy program

Objectives

We evaluated whether the surgical approach during the implementation of a robotic kidney surgery program influenced perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated a single institution experience with minimally invasive partial nephrectomy between 2006 and 2010. The study cohort comprised 86 consecutively treated patients who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN, N = 59) or robotic-assisted (RPN, N = 27) partial nephrectomy by a single surgeon.

Results

There was no difference between the LPN and RPN cohort in terms of gender, age, operative side, American Society of Anesthesiology score, or preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). An early unclamping technique was used for 22 (82%) patients in the RPN cohort and 6 (10%) patients in the LPN cohort. (P < 0.001). Warm ischemia time was lower in the RPN cohort (mean 18.5 vs. 28.0 min, P = <0.001) as result of majority undergoing early unclamping. There was no difference in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, transfusion rate, positive surgical margin, or postoperative decrease in eGFR. There was no difference in mean eGFR decrease after early unclamping (16%) versus traditional clamping (22%); however, 11 (29%) patients had greater than 50% decrease in eGFR after traditional clamping versus 0 patients after early unclamping (P = 0.014).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing RPN during implementation of a robotic kidney surgery program when compared with LPN appear to have equivalent perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy. RPN patients had surgery later in our minimally invasive partial nephrectomy experience, and these results may not be generalizable to laparoscopic and/or robotic naïve surgeons.

     

Preoperative radiographic parameters predict long-term renal impairment following partial nephrectomy

Purpose

We analyzed radiographic parameters describing anatomic features of renal tumors to identify preoperative characteristics that could help predict long-term decline in renal function following partial nephrectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 194 consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy from January 2006 to March 2009 and analyzed a cohort of 53 patients for whom complete clinical, radiographic, and operative information was available. Computed tomography images were reviewed by a single radiologist. Radiographic criteria for describing renal tumor size and location included diameter, volume, endophytic properties, proximity to collecting system, anterior/posterior location, location relative to polar lines, and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the MDRD study group equation with serum creatinine at last follow-up.

Results

The median preoperative and postoperative GFR values were 75 (IQR 65–97) and 66 (IQR 55–84) mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. At a median follow-up of 38 months, the median percentage decrease in GFR was 12%. On univariate analyses, tumor diameter (P = 0.002), tumor volume (P < 0.0001), nearness of tumor to collecting system (P = 0.017), and location relative to polar lines (P = 0.017) were associated with percentage decrease in GFR. Furthermore, higher R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was also associated with poorer renal functional outcomes following partial nephrectomy (P = 0.019).

Conclusions

Anatomic features of renal tumors defined by preoperative radiographic characteristics correlate with the degree of renal functional decline after partial nephrectomy. Identification of these parameters may assist in patient counseling and clinical decision making following partial nephrectomy. Validation in larger prospective studies is necessary.

     

Comparison of surgical outcomes and split renal function between laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Purpose

The objective of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes and total and split renal function between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Predictive risk factors of preservation of operated renal function were also assessed.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 173 patients who underwent LPN (n?=?84) or RAPN (n?=?89) between 2010 and 2020. After propensity score matching (1:1), perioperative outcomes and total and split renal function were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate predictive risk factors of preservation of operated renal function. Trifecta criteria were defined as negative surgical margins, warm ischemia time (WIT)?<?25 min, and no complications more than Clavien–Dindo grade II within 4 weeks after surgery. Split renal function was evaluated by mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan.

Results

After propensity score matching, 42 patients were allocated to each group. RAPN was associated with significantly shorter WIT (RAPN vs LPN: 12 vs 22 min; p?<?0.0001) and higher trifecta achievement rate (93.3 vs 64.2%; p?<?0.0001). Other perioperative outcomes and total and split renal function were not significantly different between LPN and RAPN. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) was a predictive risk factor of preservation of operated renal function in the multivariable logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.29–2.20, p?<?0.0001).

Conclusions

RAPN improved WIT and trifecta achievement rate, but it did not improve the preservation of operated renal function, for which RNS was found to be a strong predictive risk factor.

     

Race effects on pathological and functional outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy in a single academic tertiary care center

To explore the potential effects of race on pathological outcomes of renal tumor and on kidney function preservation in the patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) at our center. Retrospective review of our institutional review board approved database for African-American (AA) patients undergoing RPN from 2006 to 2014 was performed. AA and non-AA groups were compared with regards to demographics, tumor characteristics, functional data and, oncological outcomes. For functional outcomes, groups were matched (1:1) in terms of age, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and R.E.N.A.L score. From the total of 1005 patients, 84 were AA. Age and the tumor size were comparable between the two groups (2.7 vs. 3 cm; p = 0.29). Proportion of patients with papillary RCC was higher among AAs compared to non-AAs (43.3 vs. 19.4 %; p < 0.001). After matching AA patients with non-AA counterparts (1:1 matching), eGFR preservation at latest follow up after surgery was comparable between groups (84.3 vs. 85 %; p = 0.25). AA race (OR 3.62, p < 0.001), male gender (OR 2.05, p < 0.001) and low preoperative eGFR (OR 0.97, p < 0.001) were predictors of papillary RCC on multivariate analyses. The incidence of papillary RCC is higher in AA patients undergoing RPN. There was no difference in kidney function recovery after robotic partial nephrectomy in both AA and non-AA groups. AA race itself is not a significant factor in determining renal malignancy. Further studies are needed to clarify the impact of higher prevalence of papillary tumors in AA group in terms of long-term oncological and functional outcomes.     

Early impact of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy on renal function as assessed by renal scintigraphy

To measure the early impact of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) on renal function as assessed by renal scan (Tc 99m-DTPA), addressing the issue of risk factors for ischemic damage to the kidney. All patients undergoing RAPN for cT1 renal masses between June 2013 and May 2014 were included in this prospective study. Renal function as expressed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was assessed by Technetium 99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc 99m-DTPA) renal scan preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 month in every patient. A multivariable analysis was used for the determination of independent factors predictive of GFR decrease of the operated kidney. Overall, 32 patients underwent RAPN in the time interval. Median tumor size, blood loss, and ischemia time were 4 cm, 200 mL, and 24 min, respectively. Two grade III complications occurred (postoperative bleeding in the renal fossa, urinoma). The GFR of the operated kidney decreased significantly from 51.7 ± 15.1 mL/min per 1.73 m² preoperatively to 40, 12 ± 12.4 mL/min per 1.73 m² 1 month postoperatively (p = 0.001) with a decrease of 22.4 %. On multivariable analysis, only tumor size (p = 0.05) was a predictor of GFR decrease of the operated kidney. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy had a detectable impact on early renal function in a series of relatively large tumors and prevailing intermediate nephrometric risk. A mean decrease of 22 % of GFR as assessed by renal scan in the operated kidney was found at 1 month postoperatively. In multivariable analysis, tumor size only was a significant predictor of renal function loss.     

“Ride the Green Light”: Indocyanine Green–marked Off-clamp Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Totally Endophytic Renal Masses

BackgroundComplexity of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) mostly depends on tumor size and location. Totally endophytic renal masses represent a surgical challenge in terms of both intraoperative identification and anatomical dissection.ObjectiveTo detail a novel technique for marking preoperatively endophytic renal tumors with transarterial superselective intrarenal mass delivery of indocyanine green (ICG)-lipiodol mixture, in order to enhance surgical margins control during purely off-clamp (OC) RAPN with the use of near-infrared fluorescence imaging.Design, setting, and participantsBetween June and July 2017, 10 consecutive patients with totally endophytic renal masses underwent preoperative ICG tumor marking immediately followed by RAPN.Surgical procedurePreoperative superselective transarterial delivery of a lipiodol-ICG mixture (1:2 volume ratio) into tertiary-order arterial branches feeding the renal mass prior to transperitoneal OC-RAPN.MeasurementsClinical data were prospectively collected in our institutional RAPN dataset. Perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes of RAPN were assessed.Results and limitationsMedian tumor size was 3 cm (interquartile range 2.3–3.8). The median PADUA score was 10 (9–11). Angiographic procedure was successful in all patients. Median operative time was 75 min (65–85); median estimated blood loss was 250 ml (200–350). No conversion to on-clamp PN or radical nephrectomy was needed. All patients had uneventful perioperative course; median hospital stay was 3 d (2–3). At discharge, median hemoglobin (Hgb) and percent estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) drop were 3.3 g/dl (2.1–3.3) and 11% (10–20%), respectively. Surgical margins were negative in all cases. One-year median ipsilateral renal volume and 1-yr eGFR percent decreases were 11.7% (6–20.9%) and 12.2% (5.3–13.7%), respectively.ConclusionsWe described a novel technique to simplify challenging RAPN based on ICG superselective transarterial tumor marking. Key benefits include quick intraoperative identification of the mass with improved visualization and real-time control of resection margins.Patient summaryRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for totally endophytic renal masses is a technically demanding surgical procedure, sometimes requiring radical nephrectomy. This novel technique significantly simplified surgical complexity in our Institution. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm whether this technique provides relevant intraoperative and functional advantages.     

Nephrometry score matched robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open partial nephrectomy

To compare perioperative outcomes in the three most common partial nephrectomy modalities: robotic (RPN), laparoscopic (LPN), and open (OPN), matched for nephrometry scores. Patients aged 16–85 who underwent RPN, LPN, or OPN from 2007 to 2014 for localized renal carcinoma within our healthcare system were enrolled. Age, sex, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) as well as perioperative outcomes of estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), ischemia time (IT), change in eGFR, positive margin rate, operative time (OT), and emergency room visit rates were compared between RPN, LPN, and OPN using the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score. A total of 862 patients underwent partial nephrectomy (523 LPN, 176 OPN, and 163 RPN). Patients who underwent OPN were significantly older, and had higher nephrometry scores and CCI. When matched for nephrometry scores, minimally invasive (LPN and RPN) compared to OPN had lower EBL (<?0.0001), shorter LOS (<?0.0001), shorter IT (<?0.001), and less change in eGFR (<?0.001), particularly in nephrometry scores higher than 8 (0.0099). Comparing RPN with LPN, RPN had significantly shorter OT in all nephrometry scores (<?0.001); shorter IT and LOS in nephrometry scores higher than 7. Our study suggests that minimally invasive partial nephrectomy may have superior outcomes to OPN when matched by nephrometry scores, particularly at higher scores and for RPN. This finding may contribute to a surgeon’s decision in the approach to partial nephrectomy.     

An increasing proportion of perinephric to subcutaneous fat is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy

To investigate the association of perinephric fat (PF) thickness and the ratio of perinephric to subcutaneous fat (PF:SF) thickness on perioperative outcomes following robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), 240 patients undergoing RPN with preoperative computed tomography (CT) axial imaging were included. Perinephric and subcutaneous fat thickness was measured at the level of the renal vein and umbilicus, respectively. The association between PF thickness and PF:SF ratio and perioperative outcomes was determined by Spearman correlation and logistic regression. 121 men and 119 women with a median age of 55 years, BMI of 32, tumor size of 2.6 cm, and RENAL nephrometry score of 6 were included. On preoperative imaging, median PF thickness was 2.2 cm, SF thickness was 3.1 cm, and PF:SF ratio was 0.63. There were statistically significant positive correlations between PF thickness (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.26, p = 0.001) and PF:SF ratio (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.33, p < 0.0001) with longer operative duration of RPN. In addition, an increasing PF:SF ratio was associated with a greater risk of perioperative complications (OR = 1.82, 95 % CI 1.1–3.0, p = 0.02). No association was observed with respect to ischemia time, blood loss, length of stay, or margin status. PF thickness is associated with longer OR duration, and a greater PF:SF ratio correlated with increased OR duration and complications following RPN. These easily measured indices of fat distribution are likely more accurate in predicting perioperative outcomes after RPN than BMI alone.     

Tumor diameter accurately predicts perioperative outcomes in T1 renal cancer treated with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Purpose

To compare diameter as a continuous variable with categorical R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) in predicting surgical outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients receiving RPN at our institution between July 2007 and June 2014 (n = 286). Three separate multivariate analyses were performed to assess the relationship between RNS components (R = radius, E = endophyticity, N = nearness to collecting system, L = location relative to polar lines), total RNS, and diameter as a continuous variable with operating time, warm ischemia time (WIT), and estimated blood loss (EBL). Each linear regression model’s quality of fit to the data was assessed with coefficients of determination (R ²).

Results

Continuous tumor diameter and total RNS were each significantly correlated to operative time, EBL, and WIT (p < 0.001). Categorical R related to operative time (R = 2 vs. R = 1, p = 0.001; R = 3 vs. R = 1, p = 0.001) and WIT (R = 2 vs. R = 1, p = 0.003; R = 3 vs. R = 1, p = 0.016), but not to EBL. For each of these outcomes, diameter outperformed both R and total RNS, as assessed by R ². Age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and anterior versus posterior location did not correlate with surgical outcomes.

Conclusions

In this series of RPN from a high-volume center, surgical outcomes more closely related to tumor diameter than RNS. While RNS provides surgeons a standardized tool for preoperative planning of renal masses, tumor size may be employed as a more familiar measurement when counseling patients on potential outcomes.

     

Robotic partial nephrectomy outcomes at a single institution and experience with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score

Partial nephrectomy is the current gold-standard treatment of small renal masses. The articulated instruments of the surgical robot have made the laparoscopic approach more feasible. We present our experience with 50 robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) surgeries and attempt to validate a recently reported nephrometry score. From July 2008 to July 2010, 50 (53 planned) elective RALPNs were performed utilizing the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). All patients had an enhancing renal mass on CT scan pre-operatively. Clinicopathologic, surgical, and renal functional (Cockcroft–Gault formula) outcomes were recorded prospectively and analyzed. Mean tumor size, length of surgery (LS), warm ischemia time (WIT), and nephrometry scores were 3.6 cm (1–8), 303 min (133–610), 29.1 min (11–42), and 6.8 (4–11) respectively. Renal cell carcinoma was found in 39 (78%) patients. When evaluating the nephrometry score, comparison of low, medium, and high complexity tumors for length of surgery, WIT, and estimated blood loss (EBL) showed no difference (p > 0.05). Nearness to the collecting system (N score 1 vs. N score 3) showed increased EBL (195 ml vs. 510 mL, p = 0.005), and location relative to polar lines (L score 1 and L score 2) increased mean LS (265 vs. 359 min, p = 0.02). RALPN is safe and effective. Nephrometry scores are a method of standardizing tumor complexity and can be utilized in comparing tumor cohorts but may not be predictive of intra-operative outcomes.     

A comparison of pathologic outcomes of matched robotic and open partial nephrectomies

Purpose

Open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) are widely utilized techniques for small renal masses. The lack of tactile feedback and limitations of laparoscopy may result in differences in the surgical specimen that may impact oncologic outcome. We present postoperative pathological outcomes data in a cohort of patients matched for nephrometry score, tumor size, gender and age.

Materials and methods

We reviewed 81 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy between January 2003 and March 2010. Twenty-seven underwent RPN and 54 received OPN. Two OPN cases were matched for nephrometry score, tumor size, gender and age for each RPN. Postoperative pathological specimens were reviewed by a urologic pathologist regarding margin status, pathologic stage, histology, renal capsule violation, among other variables.

Results

Sixty-two (76.5 %) patients were found to have renal cell carcinoma on final pathology. Frozen sectioning with tumor bed sampling was intra-operatively employed in 70 cases (86.4 %). The overall positive margin occurrence was 1 of 81 patients, which occurred during an RPN for a hilar tumor and converted to radical nephrectomy to achieve negative clinical margins. Additionally, 14.8 % of OPN patients had renal capsule violation as compared to 3.7 % of RPN cases (p = 0.34). Importantly, the mean distance to the proximal margin edge for RPN specimens (2.77 mm) was equivalent to OPN (3.01 mm), p = 0.46.

Conclusion

When matched for nephrometry score, tumor size, gender and age, RPN produces similar pathological outcomes to OPN.     

Major perioperative complications after spine surgery in patients with cerebral palsy: assessment of risk factors

Purpose

A prospective, longitudinal cohort was studied to determine the incidence, consequences, and risk factors of major perioperative complications in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) treated with spinal fusion. There is a wide variety of data available on the complications of spine surgery; however, little exists on the perioperative complications in patients with CP.

Methods

A prospective multicenter dataset of consecutive patients with CP treated with spinal fusion was evaluated. All major perioperative complications were identified and stratified into categories: pulmonary, gastrointestinal, other medical, wound infection, neurological, instrumentation related, and unplanned staged surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify various risk factors for major perioperative complications.

Results

127 patients were identified with a mean age of 14.3 ± 2.6 years. Overall, 39.4 % of the patients had a major perioperative complication. Occurrence of a complication [no complication (NC), yes complication (YC)] resulted in significantly increased intensive care unit (ICU) (NC = 3.2 days, YC = 7.8 days, p < 0.05) and hospital stays (NC = 7.7 days, YC = 15.6 days, p < 0.05). Variables associated with greater risk of a complication included: increased estimated blood loss (EBL) (p < 0.001), larger preoperative kyphosis (p = 0.05), staged procedures (p < 0.05), a lack of antifibrinolytic use (p < 0.05), and a trend toward lower body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.08). Multivariate regression analysis revealed an increased EBL as independently associated with a major perioperative complication (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In this cohort of patients with CP who underwent spinal fusion, 39.4 % experienced a major perioperative complication, with pulmonary being the most common. The occurrence of a major perioperative complication lengthened both ICU and hospital stay. Risk factors for major perioperative complications included greater preoperative kyphosis, staged procedures, a lack of antifibrinolytic use, and increased EBL, with the latter being an independent predictor of a major perioperative complication.

Level of evidence

2.