HRT as secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Objective: To review the evidence of the efficacy of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease or stroke. Results: Although a number of rather large and prolonged non-randomized observational studies have produced convincing and consistent evidence of the efficacy of HRT in the prevention of recurrence of cardiac events, the first randomized, placebo controlled trial (RCT) on heart disease and estrogen replacement study (HERS) reported no benefit of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in secondary prevention of cardiac events in women with established coronary artery disease. This was supported by RCT reporting no effect of CEE or CEE + MPA on the progress of coronary sclerosis. Similarly, some nonrandomized observational studies have evaluated the risk of recurrent stroke in regard to the use of HRT, and the data are conflicting reporting a reduced or increased risk of recurrence for HRT users. One RCT has shown that low-dose estrogen treatment can only slow down the progression of carotid arteriosclerosis in high-risk postmenopausal women, whereas two other RCTs have shown no benefit (or risk) of using HRT for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke or progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Conclusion: The evidence accumutaed so far shows that HRT has no place in secondary prevention of coronary or carotic artery disease. Its use in these patients must be based on solid nonvascular indications and expected benefits from these causes.     

A prospective study of postmenopausal estrogen therapy and coronary heart disease

To clarify the possible role of postmenopausal estrogen use in coronary heart disease, we surveyed 121,964 female nurses, aged 30 to 55 years, with mailed questionnaires, beginning in 1976. Information on hormone use and other potential risk factors was updated and the incidence of coronary heart disease was ascertained through additional questionnaires in 1978 and 1980, with a 92.7 per cent follow-up. End points were documented by medical records. During 105,786 person-years of observation among 32,317 postmenopausal women who were initially free of coronary disease, 90 women had either nonfatal myocardial infarctions (65 cases) or fatal coronary heart disease (25 cases). As compared with the risk in women who had never used postmenopausal hormones, the age-adjusted relative risk of coronary disease in those who had ever used them was 0.5 (95 per cent confidence limits, 0.3 and 0.8; P = 0.007), and the risk in current users was 0.3 (95 per cent confidence limits, 0.2 and 0.6; P = 0.001). The relative risks were similar for fatal and nonfatal disease and were unaltered after adjustment for cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol levels, a parental history of myocardial infarction, past use of oral contraceptives, and obesity. These data support the hypothesis that the postmenopausal use of estrogen reduces the risk of severe coronary heart disease.     

Current perspectives on the benefits of HRT in menopausal women

AIMS: Women in the West can now expect to live one third of their life in a postmenopausal state, and consequently in a state of estrogen deficiency. This can have a number of consequences, and many women suffer vasomotor symptoms during the climacteric. Estrogen deficiency can also result in changes to the skin, hair, urogenital, cardiovascular and skeletal systems. This article reviews some of the main actions of replacement estrogen in postmenopausal women, and discusses the major benefits of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). REVIEW: HRT is well documented to reduce vasomotor symptoms in women suffering from estrogen deficiency, and can have beneficial effects on the skin and the prevention of skin aging. HRT has beneficial effects on urogenitary function including reductions in urinary incontinence and vaginal atrophy. HRT is used as a first-line treatment to prevent or reverse the development of postmenopausal osteoporosis and can reduce the risk of fractures if taken for 5-10 years from the menopause. In epidemiological studies, ERT was associated with a reduction in the risk of coronary heart disease. Estrogens seem to affect the cardiovascular system directly and indirectly such as reducing some of the coronary risk factors. In recent years, estrogen has been linked to beneficial effects in the CNS including an association with a reduction in the risk of developing Alzheimer's Disease. Despite these benefits, HRT compliance remains low, and physicians need to address this if patients are to gain the benefits.     

Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with specific risk factors for coronary artery disease

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women is associated with a reduction in the risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) of about 50%. Women with an elevated risk for CAD appear to benefit most by HRT. The HRT-associated cardiovascular protection may be related to favourable changes in several important cardiovascular risk estimators, such as circulating blood concentrations of cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and homocysteine. This paper reviews the literature presently available on the effects of HRT on cholesterol, Lp(a) and homocysteine concentrations, and special attention will be given to the effects on their elevated concentrations. The effect of HRT in women with hypertension is reviewed as well. From this overview it can be concluded that risk factors such as cholesterol, Lp(a), and homocysteine can be favourably modulated by HRT, and especially, that the strongest reductions can be achieved in those women with the highest concentrations. Although clinical trials still need to demonstrate the impact of lowering concentrations of Lp(a) and homocysteine, HRT appears to be a promising risk reduction strategy in this respect.     

Influences of hormone replacement therapy on postmenopausal women's health perceptions

OBJECTIVE: To assess the beliefs of climacteric women regarding their health, menopause, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). DESIGN: Medical students asked to interview 526 healthy women, ranging from 40 to 64 years of age, between January and February of 2002. Of that number, 26 (4.9%) declined to participate in the interview. Thus, 500 women were interviewed about their beliefs and perceptions regarding their quality of life and health risks, as well as their opinions on menopause and HRT. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 53.3 +/- 6.2 years; 83.4% were postmenopausal, and 18.8% were HRT users. Of the women interviewed, 38.6% believed that their health was good. Although 78.8% thought that cancer is the main cause of death, 64% of them considered themselves to be at high risk for cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. Most (64%) believed that menopause deteriorates the quality of life and that it increases cardiovascular risk (52.4%) and osteoporosis (72.0%). The HRT users perceived that they had better health status (48.9% v 36.2%, P < 0.02) and smaller cardiovascular risk (54.3% v 66.3%, P < 0.04) than did the nonusers; however, they ignored the preventive effect of estrogens in osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Women believe that menopause deteriorates their health. The HRT users perceived themselves to be healthier and to have a smaller risk for cardiovascular disease.     

Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women

To determine the relation of menopause to the risk of coronary heart disease, we analyzed data on a prospective cohort of 121,700 U.S. women 30 to 55 years old who were followed from 1976 to 1982. Information on menopausal status, the type of menopause, and other risk factors was obtained in 1976 and updated every two years by mailing questionnaires. Through 1982, the follow-up rate was 98.3 percent for mortality and 95.4 percent for nonfatal events. After we controlled for age and cigarette smoking, women who had had a natural menopause and who had never taken replacement estrogen had no appreciable increase in the risk of coronary heart disease, as compared with premenopausal women (adjusted rate ratio, 1.2; 95 percent confidence limits, 0.8 and 1.8). Again compared with premenopausal women, the occurrence of a natural menopause together with the use of estrogens did not affect the risk (rate ratio, 0.8, 95 percent confidence limits, 0.4 and 1.3). Women who had undergone bilateral oophorectomy and who had never taken estrogens after menopause had an increased risk (rate ratio, 2.2; 95 percent confidence limits, 1.2 and 4.2). However, the use of estrogens in the postmenopausal period appeared to eliminate this increased risk among these women as compared with premenopausal women (rate ratio, 0.9; 95 percent confidence limits, 0.6 and 1.6). These data suggest that, in contrast to a natural menopause, bilateral oophorectomy increases the risk of coronary heart disease. This increase appears to be prevented by estrogen-replacement therapy.     

Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the nurses' health study

BACKGROUND. The effect of postmenopausal estrogen therapy on the risk of cardiovascular disease remains controversial. Our 1985 report in the Journal, based on four years of follow-up, suggested that estrogen therapy reduced the risk of coronary heart disease, but a report published simultaneously from the Framingham Study suggested that the risk was increased. In addition, studies of the effect of estrogens on stroke have yielded conflicting results. METHODS. We followed 48,470 postmenopausal women, 30 to 63 years old, who were participants in the Nurses' Health Study, and who did not have a history of cancer or cardiovascular disease at base line. During up to 10 years of follow-up (337,854 person-years), we documented 224 strokes, 405 cases of major coronary disease (nonfatal myocardial infarctions or deaths from coronary causes), and 1263 deaths from all causes. RESULTS. After adjustment for age and other risk factors, the overall relative risk of major coronary disease in women currently taking estrogen was 0.56 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.80); the risk was significantly reduced among women with either natural or surgical menopause. We observed no effect of the duration of estrogen use independent of age. The findings were similar in analyses limited to women who had recently visited their physicians (relative risk, 0.45; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.66) and in a low-risk group that excluded women reporting current cigarette smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or a Quetelet index above the 90th percentile (relative risk, 0.53; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.91). The relative risk for current and former users of estrogen as compared with those who had never used it was 0.89 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.00) for total mortality and 0.72 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.95) for mortality from cardiovascular disease. The relative risk of stroke when current users were compared with those who had never used estrogen was 0.97 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.45), with no marked differences according to type of stroke. CONCLUSIONS. Current estrogen use is associated with a reduction in the incidence of coronary heart disease as well as in mortality from cardiovascular disease, but it is not associated with any change in the risk of stroke.     

Trends in the incidence of coronary heart disease and changes in diet and lifestyle in women

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found concurrent declines in blood pressure, serum cholesterol levels, and the incidence of and mortality from coronary disease. However, the effects of changes in diet and lifestyle on trends in coronary disease are largely unknown. METHODS: We followed 85,941 women who were 34 to 59 years old and had no previously diagnosed cardiovascular disease or cancer from 1980 to 1994 in the Nurses' Health Study. Diet and lifestyle variables were assessed at base line and updated during follow-up. RESULTS: After adjustment for the effect of age, the incidence of coronary disease declined by 31 percent from the two-year period 1980-1982 to the two-year period 1992-1994. From 1980 to 1992, the proportion of participants currently smoking declined by 41 percent, the proportion of postmenopausal women using hormone therapy increased by 175 percent, and the prevalence of overweight, defined as a body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 25 or more, increased by 38 percent. During the study period, diet improved substantially. Statistically, changes in these variables--when considered simultaneously--explained a 21 percent decline in the incidence of coronary disease, representing 68 percent of the overall decline from 1980-1982 to 1992-1994. Taken individually, the reduction in smoking explained a 13 percent decline in the incidence of coronary disease; improvement in diet explained a 16 percent decline; and increase in postmenopausal hormone use explained a 9 percent decline. On the other hand, the increase in body-mass index explained an 8 percent increase in the incidence of coronary disease. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in smoking, improvement in diet, and an increase in postmenopausal hormone use accounted for much of the decline in the incidence of coronary disease in this group of women. An increasing prevalence of obesity, however, appears to have slowed the decline in the incidence of coronary disease.     

Hormone therapy and coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: the Rancho Bernardo Study

OBJECTIVE: To determine (1) whether past or current hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women is associated with subclinical coronary artery plaque burden, (2) whether any association is independent of age, body size, blood pressure, lipids, fasting plasma glucose, cigarette smoking, leisure time physical activity, alcohol intake, use of lipid-lowering medications, and socioeconomic status, and (3) whether any association varies by duration of HT or by the use of combined versus unopposed HT. DESIGN: An observational study, with HT validated and coronary heart disease risk factors determined between 1997 and 1999 in a research clinic, and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) evaluated by electron beam computed tomography in 2001 through 2002. Participants were 204 community-dwelling postmenopausal women from the Rancho Bernardo cohort aged 55 to 78 years with no history of heart disease. RESULTS: The odds of severe CACS in current estrogen users (n = 127) was 0.40 (95% CI 0.19, 0.82), controlling for all covariates. Past users (n = 40) had intermediate odds (multiply adjusted OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.28, 1.58). In subgroup analyses, age-adjusted associations did not differ between the 68 women using unopposed estrogen versus the 59 using an estrogen-progestin regimen. Women who had used HT for at least 10 years (n = 86) had significantly less (P = 0.01) plaque burden than shorter term users (n = 41). CONCLUSIONS: Both the strong association and the duration of use effect independent of lifestyle and social class suggest an antiatherogenic effect of postmenopausal estrogen. Only a clinical trial can completely exclude confounding by social class, lifestyle, and unmeasured covariates.     

HRT and the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Observational studies have consistently shown a benefit of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on coronary heart disease (CHD), but some randomised studies have not shown any significant effect. Thus questions still remains as to whether HRT is beneficial for CHD, and in whom this benefit might be achieved. The biological effects of oestrogen on the cardiovascular system have been extensively studied, and beneficial effects on metabolic CHD risk factors, as well as on arterial function and on surrogate clinical markers of CHD, have been demonstrated. Thus it seems implausible that HRT should not benefit CHD in postmenopausal women. Most randomised trials using clinical outcomes have studied just one dose of one HRT regimen, a dose inappropriately high with the average starting age of the participants being in their mid-60s. The observational population studies largely comprise women starting on HRT at appropriate dose around the age of menopause, i.e. early 50s. In fact, it was the older women in the randomised trials that failed to show benefit, whereas there was a trend to benefit in the younger ones for whom the starting dose of HRT was appropriate. Furthermore, a pilot study of lower dose HRT in older women did not show any cardiovascular harm. Inappropriately high doses of oestrogen could cause cardiovascular harm due to transient disturbances in thrombogenesis and vascular remodelling. Whilst the greatest CHD benefit may be seen by starting HRT in the early postmenopause, this does not exclude benefit in older women given appropriate low dose therapy.     

Impaired ovarian function and risk factors for atherosclerosis in premenopausal women

Objectives: The aim of the study was to obtain information on the possible relationship between impaired ovarian function and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Material and methods: Serum lipid levels, plasma fibrinolytic potential and histological and biochemical changes in the intima of the uterine artery were investigated in premenopausal women with irregular menstrual cycles, and the results were compared with those from regularly menstruating women. In addition, the same parameters were studied in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and in postmenopausal women who had never used HRT. In total 64 patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign reasons were included the study. Results: Plasma fibrinogen concentration was significantly higher in irregularly menstruating women as compared with women with regular cycles. In women with irregular cycles thickened or sclerotic arterial intima was a significantly more common finding as compared with regularly menstruating women. A significant positive correlation was observed between plasma fibrinogen concentration and intimal esterified cholesterol content in women with thickened or sclerotic uterine artery. Conclusions: These data suggest an important role for normal ovarian function in the prevention of atherosclerosis.     

A case-control study on the effect of hormone replacement therapy on ischaemic heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians believe that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protects against coronary heart disease (CHD) in women. However, recent reports have cast some doubt on this because of lack of dose-response or duration-response effects. Since CHD is common in women--about half of all postmenopausal women will get it and about a third of these will die from it--the effect of HRT on CHD is of great public health importance. AIM: To determine the degree of cardioprotection conferred by HRT, including the effect of duration, time since last issue, the addition of progestogens, route of administration, and dose. DESIGN: Population-based case-control study. SETTING: Nine general practices recruited from the Trent Focus Collaborative Research Network. METHOD: A total of 417 female cases with CHD matched by age and practice to 2435 controls with a case-control ratio of 1:5.8 were studied. The main outcome measure was the odds ratio for CHD calculated by conditional logistic regression adjusted for diabetes, hypertension, body mass index, and smoking. RESULTS: No evidence was found, either from univariate analysis or multivariate analysis, that use of HRT was associated with reduced risk of CHD (odds ratio = 1.32; 95% confidence interval = 0.93 to 1.87). Indeed, the trend was in the opposite direction. There was no association for different types of HRT (opposed or unopposed) or routes of administration. Similarly, there was no association for current or past use and no effect for dose or duration. CONCLUSION: This study adds to growing evidence that HRT does not confer cardioprotection. Until there is robust evidence to the contrary, general physicians need to assess risks and benefits of HRT independently of any possible reduction in risk of CHD.     

Recency and duration of postmenopausal hormone therapy: effects on bone mineral density and fracture risk in the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) study

OBJECTIVES: Results from the Women's Health Initiative showed that postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prevents fractures but has an overall unfavorable risk:benefit ratio, leading to the recommendation that HRT be used only for women with troublesome menopause symptoms, and for as short a time as possible. This recommendation has important implications for the timing and duration of HRT and the prevention of osteoporosis. The large number of women participating in the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) program provided the opportunity to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and 1-year fracture risk in analyses stratified by duration and recency of HRT. DESIGN: Participants were 170,852 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 104, without known osteoporosis, who were recruited from primary physicians offices across the US. BMD was measured at one of four peripheral sites, and the 1-year risk of osteoporotic fracture was assessed by questionnaire. RESULTS: At baseline, current HRT users had the highest T-scores at every age. Among current hormone users, women who had used HRT longest had the highest BMD levels. Women who had stopped HRT more than 5 years previously, regardless of duration of use, had T-scores similar to never-users. Current but not past hormone use at baseline was associated with a 25% to 29% lower risk of osteoporotic fracture (P < 0.0001) in 1 year, compared with nonusers. These findings were independent of age, ethnicity, body mass index, lifestyle, years postmenopausal, and site of BMD measurement. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that postmenopausal BMD and fracture are closely associated with current, but not prior, HRT use. Use of HRT for 5 years or less, as proposed for treatment of symptomatic women during menopause transition, is unlikely to preserve bone or significantly reduce fracture risk in later years.     

Do women using hormone replacement treatment have less pre-existing cardiovascular risk

Background: Several studies have suggested that women who choose to use hormone replacement therapy (HRT) already, before starting this therapy, have a better cardiovascular risk profile than those who do not use it. Some of these studies contain factors of confusion and biases, such as HRT users’ greater educational achievement or physical activity, which could have led to wrong conclusions. Aim: To study a cohort, without confounding factors in order to analyse whether the cardiovascular risk profile is different in women who choose to use HRT. Material and methods: Coronary risk factors of 387 women between 45 and 64 were studied. This study was carried out at the Unit for the Preventive Medical Examination of the South Metropolitan Health Service in Santiago (Chile) during the annual check-up. The first evaluation was in 1991–1992; with a second evaluation 5 years later. Of all the women, 174 (45%) never received hormones (Group A), 124 (32%) were HRT users at the time (Group B), and 89 (23%) were former-users (Group C). Results: No differences were found between the three groups for age, body mass index (BMI), educational background, alcohol consumption, smoking or physical activity. Blood pressure was similar in the three groups. No significant differences were found in total cholesterol (A, 221.7±42.2; B, 228.2±47.0; and C, 227.3±44.9 mg/dl); high density lipoprotein (HDL, A, 53.5±13.2; B, 51.8±12.8; and C, 54.0±12.4 mg/dl); low density lipoprotein (LDL, A, 141.7±38.9; B, 148.5±43.1 and C, 148.3±43.8 mg/dl); triglycerides (A, 134.5±67.9; B, 141.0±66.1; and C, 127.3±68.5 mg/dl) and glucose plasma levels (A, 90.5±32.2; B, 87.7±15.3; and C, 85.0±8.8 mg/dl). Conclusions: Our results suggest that women who choose to use HRT have a cardiovascular risk profile, before starting the therapy, similar to those who do not use it.     

Myocardial infarction risk and hormone replacement: differences between products

OBJECTIVES: To establish the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in users of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) compared with non-users and to compare the risk between different HRT regimens. METHODS: A population-based cohort and case-control study, and a case-control study nested within a cohort of HRT users, using the UK General Practice Research Database. Differences between HRT regimen, mode of administration and duration and recency of use were examined whilst adjusting for confounding. RESULTS: In the cohort and case-control study, 4537 cases of MI were identified in 2.62 million observed women years, cases were age-matched to 27,220 controls. In both studies, current and past HRT use were associated with reduced risk estimates for MI compared with no prior use. MIs were less likely to be fatal amongst women who had used HRT than amongst never users (OR(adj) 0.58; 95% CI 0.45-0.75). No difference in risk was seen between current and past use, oral and transdermal HRT or between different regimens (p>0.44). In the nested study, no difference was found in the association with MI risk between different oestrogen-progestogen combinations or between different combinations and tibolone. Unopposed oestrogen use was not associated with a decrease in risk compared with combined HRT. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with previous observational studies in supporting the hypothesis that use of postmenopausal HRT is associated with a decrease in risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Case fatality differed between HRT users and non-users, suggesting a protective effect of HRT. This study does not demonstrate a difference between regimens.     

Use of hormone replacement therapy in Italian women aged 50-70 years

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present cross-sectional analysis was to describe patterns and determinants of use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in a large sample of women attending mammographic screening. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2001, 8533 women aged 50-70 years were recruited by 11 screening centres, and structured interviews were made collecting information on socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, medical and reproductive history (overall response rate 87%). RESULTS: Current HRT use was reported by 6.9% of women (n=585), the average duration of use being 3.5 years; 13.2% were ever HRT users. Binomial and multinomial logistic regression (MLR) analyses showed that younger age, higher educational level, past mammographic examination and history of bilateral oophorectomy were the major predictors of current and ever HRT use. Current use was also more frequently reported by women who were thinner, nulliparae, had had induced menopause, had a later onset of menopause, with history of oral contraceptive use and hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy. By contrast, those who were diabetics or had positive history of cardiovascular disease were less likely to be current HRT users. No differences were found in HRT use according to marital status, type of occupation, menopausal status, smoking, history of breast cancer, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension and phlebitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support previous findings indicating that HRT use in Italian women is uncommon and of short duration. Current HRT users were less likely than non-users to report several characteristics associated with higher mortality and morbidity, in accordance with the healthy-user phenomenon described in other countries.     

Risk factors for coronary heart disease: a study in inner London.

A survey was carried out among 281 men and women aged between 30 and 64 years randomly selected from five general practices located in the inner London borough of Tower Hamlets, to determine the prevalence of risk factors for coronary heart disease. Smoking and obesity were both more pronounced in Tower Hamlets than in comparable national studies: 51% of men and 44% of women were smokers and 57% of these were smoking 20 or more cigarettes per day. A body mass index of 30 or more was present in 18% of men and 10% of women and a body mass index of 25 or more in 71% of men and 49% of women. Two or more risk factors for coronary heart disease (smoking and/or hypertension and/or raised cholesterol levels) were present in 25% of men and 22% of women. For every person known by their general practitioner to have established cardiovascular disease, there were an additional two people also at risk on the basis of multiple risk factors. In this inner city population the prevalence of cardiovascular risk, for women as well as men, has major resource and organizational implications for primary care. A strategy for change requires action based on graded multiple risks for both men and women.     

Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle

BACKGROUND: Many lifestyle-related risk factors for coronary heart disease have been identified, but little is known about their effect on the risk of disease when they are considered together. METHODS: We followed 84,129 women participating in the Nurses' Health Study who were free of diagnosed cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes at base line in 1980. Information on diet and lifestyle was updated periodically. During 14 years of follow-up, we documented 1128 major coronary events (296 deaths from coronary heart disease and 832 nonfatal infarctions). We defined subjects at low risk as those who were not currently smoking, had a body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) under 25, consumed an average of at least half a drink of an alcoholic beverage per day, engaged in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (which could include brisk walking) for at least half an hour per day, on average, and scored in the highest 40 percent of the cohort for consumption of a diet high in cereal fiber, marine n-3 fatty acids, and folate, with a high ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fat, and low in trans fat and glycemic load, which reflects the extent to which diet raises blood glucose levels. RESULTS: Many of the factors were correlated, but each independently and significantly predicted risk, even after further adjustment for age, family history, presence or absence of diagnosed hypertension or diagnosed high cholesterol level, and menopausal status. Women in the low-risk category (who made up 3 percent of the population) had a relative risk of coronary events of 0.17 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.41) as compared with all the other women. Eighty-two percent of coronary events in the study cohort (95 percent confidence interval, 58 to 93 percent) could be attributed to lack of adherence to this low-risk pattern. CONCLUSION: Among women, adherence to lifestyle guidelines involving diet, exercise, and abstinence from smoking is associated with a very low risk of coronary heart disease.     

Hormone replacement therapy in Norwegian women, 1996-1997.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among Norwegian women and examine factors related to use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample of 18,199 Norwegian women aged 45-64 years responded to a postal questionnaire in 1996-1997. The questionnaire included questions about menstruation status and fertility, oral contraceptives (OC) and HRT use, lifestyle, health and socio-economic status. The response rate was 60%. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of ever using systemic or local HRT was 43.9%. Current use was reported by 31.9% of the women. The highest prevalence was in the age group of 55-59 years where 57.4% reported ever use, and 43.1% current use. Mean duration of use among current users was 4.6 years. More than 60% of the women were classified as postmenopausal, two-thirds of them naturally postmenopausal. The prevalence of ever using HRT was 51.8%. Prevalence of use was higher among earlier OC users, smokers, lean women and in households with high income. Among older women, users had a higher educational level than non-users, while this difference disappeared among the youngest of the women. Fixed combinations of estradiol and noretisteroneacetate either cyclic or continuous, are used by six out of ten users. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the increasing trend in sales of estrogens in Norway and suggest that user patterns are changing. More than four out of ten women aged 45-64 years reported ever use of HRT, and one out of three reported current use. Socio-economic differences between users and non-users seem to disappear among women under 55 years of age, but persist in the older age groups. Short time use still dominates.