Atenolol improves blood pressure control in patients taking captopril and frusemide

In a double-blind randomised cross-over study atenolol 100 mg daily and matching placebo were given to 14 patients whose blood pressure (BP) was uncontrolled on a fixed dose of captopril and frusemide. Atenolol produced a further reduction in both supine (170/105 mmHg to 163/94 mmHg) and standing (171/114 mmHg to 160/96 mmHg) BP and a significant fall in pulse rate and plasma renin activity (PRA). This fall in BP showed a highly significant correlation with pre-treatment plasma renin levels. No adverse side effects were encountered during the study. Previous suggestions that beta-blockade had no additional hypotensive effect in patients receiving captopril were not substantiated. For patients whose BP was poorly controlled with captopril and a diuretic, a selective beta-blocker is suggested as a useful third line agent.     

Atenolol or propranolol in hypertensive patients poorly controlled on captopril and frusemide

Eighteen patients whose clinic blood pressure (BP) remained over 95 mmHg despite treatment with captopril 50 mg twice daily plus frusemide 40 mg twice daily were randomised in a crossover study to four weeks' treatment with once daily atenolol 100 mg, slow release propranolol 160 mg or placebo. The reduction in BP on atenolol was superior to that on both propranolol and placebo. The mean supine BP 24 hours post dosing were 177/110 mmHg (placebo), 173/109 mmHg (propranolol) and 164/100 mmHg (atenolol). The corresponding mean heart rates were 77 bpm (placebo), 63 bpm (propranolol) and 62 bpm (propranolol) and 62 bpm (atenolol). The difference in hypotensive efficacy between atenolol and propranolol is not readily explained but our study shows that atenolol has a clinically useful supplementary effect on BP. Refractory hypertension remains an important clinical problem and further studies are required to establish the optimum combination of drugs that should be used with captopril in order to achieve 'target' BP in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.     

Captopril in cardiac insufficiency. Immediate and long-term effects

Captopril was administered to 23 patients in cardiac failure refractory to digitalo-diuretic therapy. Four patients had a large fall in systolic blood pressure (less than 70 mmHg) with a single dose of 25 mg of captopril. In the other 19 patients a significant fall in mean pulmonary capillary pressure (16,8 +/- 6,1 mmHg vs 27,2 +/- 8,5 mmHg, p less than 0,001), mean pulmonary artery pressure (26,3 +/- 11,3 mmHg vs 38,3 +/- 12,4 mmHg, p less than 0,001), mean right atrial pressure (5 +/- 5 mmHg vs 8 +/- 6 mmHg, p less than 0,01) was observed: there was a moderate fall in mean systemic arterial pressure (13%, p less than 0,001). There was a significant fall in pulmonary resistance (27%, p less than 0,001). The cardiac index increased (2,8 +/- 0,5 l/min/m2, p less than 0,001) and systemic resistance fell by 25% (p less than 0,001). The heart rate decreased by an average of 7 beats/min (p less than 0,02). The treatment was stopped in one patient because of the inefficacy of captopril at 100 mg per dose. The average daily dose in the 18 patients on long-term treatment was 212,5 +/- 106,8 mg. At the second month, the haemodynamic parameters were remeasured before the morning dose of captopril. The effects observed after the single dose were maintained apart from the systemic blood pressure, heart rate and systemic resistances which had returned to the value observed before administration of captopril. The mean pulmonary capillary pressure was significantly lower than before treatment but was higher than after the single dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Nifedipine and acebutolol in combination for the treatment of moderate to severe essential hypertension

In a randomised, crossover study of patients with moderate to severe essential hypertension, the effects of the calcium entry antagonist nifedipine and the beta-receptor blocking drug acebutolol were studied on their own, and in combination. After 4 weeks of nifedipine tablets 20 mg twice daily (Adalat, Bayer), mean supine blood pressure (BP) fell by 20 mmHg and after 4 weeks of acebutolol 200 mg twice a day (Sectral, May & Baker) by 11 mmHg. When nifedipine and acebutolol were given in combination in the above doses for 4 weeks, there was a significantly greater fall in BP than with either agent alone, supine mean arterial pressure falling by 27 mmHg. The above BPs were measured 2 h after the last dose of tablets. Measurements 12 h after the last dose showed smaller falls in BP, with a significantly greater fall with combination treatment than with acebutolol alone. The fall in BP 12 h after the last dose of the combination was greater than with nifedipine alone but this difference was not statistically significant. This randomised, controlled study showed that nifedipine and acebutolol have a marked additive effect on BP which is sustained for at least 12 h after treatment.     

Practical issues when initiating captopril therapy in chronic heart failure. What is the appropriate dose and how long should patients be observed?

To assess the feasibility of introducing captopril in patients with chronic heart failure on an outpatient rather than an inpatient basis a double-blind placebo-controlled study was carried out to compare either 6.25 mg or 25.0 mg of captopril as a starting dose; followed by either incremental doses of 6.25, 12.5, and 25.0 mg (low dose group), or 25.0 mg 8 hourly (high dose group) respectively. Forty-one patients in a general medical ward within a large teaching hospital with moderate to severe, stable, diuretic-controlled chronic heart failure, who were not hyponatraemic, hypokalaemic or on a dose of diuretic greater than 120 mg of frusemide took part. No patient experienced symptomatic hypotension. Both doses of captopril produced a significant drop in blood pressure (BP), the magnitude of which was similar in both groups. The first dose-induced fall correlated significantly with subsequent dose-related reductions in BP. Therefore if a patient did not have a hypotensive response to the first dose of captopril he/she would be unlikely to have one with subsequent doses. In the group as a whole, the magnitude of the fall in BP after the first dose correlated significantly with starting plasma levels of angiotensin II, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), aldosterone, and renin. However, on an individual basis, the two patients with the greatest fall in blood pressure did not have the most activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system. This serves to emphasise the unpredictability of this response and the need to initiate therapy under clinical observation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ketanserin and hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of arterial hypertension

The chronic antihypertensive effect of the combination of ketanserin (KET) 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg was evaluated in 20 patients with arterial hypertension of mild to moderate degree. After a 2-week wash-out period, patients were prescribed a single oral dose of KET 40 mg or HCTZ 25 mg in a randomized order at 2-day intervals and blood pressure and heart rate were measured during the following 24 hrs by an automatic recorder. Thereafter patients were given the combination of KET 40 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg for 6 weeks and 24 hrs blood pressure was recorded after the first dose of the combination and at the end of treatment. Ketanserin induced a significant fall in systolic and diastolic pressures for up to 8 hrs; thiazide did not induce any change in these parameters. The combination of KET + HCTZ in the acute study reduced significantly systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures for up to 10 hrs. After 6 weeks of treatment with KET + HCTZ, blood pressure showed a further fall at each time period and was normalized (BP greater than 160/80 mmHg) for 8 hrs after dosing. The results of this study indicate that once daily oral administration of the combination of KET 40 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg in mild to moderate primary hypertensives significantly reduces blood pressure over 24 hrs. Fairly good control of BP, i.e. BP less than 160/90 mmHg, was, however, achieved only up to 8 hrs after drug administration, indicating that this combination given once daily is not able to normalize BP over the following 24 hrs.     

Effect of acute and chronic captopril infusion on blood pressure in the two-kidney, one clip hypertensive rat

The effect on blood pressure (BP) of acute and chronic suppression of angiotensin (ANG) II was studied in the two-kidney, one clip hypertensive rat. Conscious, chronically catheterized rats were given a bolus injection of captopril (2.5 mg/kg) followed by a chronic infusion of either dextrose or captopril (1 mg/kg per h) lasting 5 days. Blood pressure was measured continuously by a computer technique. Following the acute injection of captopril, arterial BP fell from 165.1 +/- 19.4 mmHg (mean +/- s.d.) to a minimum of 137.6 +/- 23.3 mmHg after 15 min. Twelve hours after starting the chronic infusion of captopril, BP fell to a minimum of 112.5 +/- 19.4 mmHg. This was significantly lower than that after the acute injection of captopril. Blood pressure remained lower throughout the 5-day infusion ranging, on the 5th day, from 122.1 +/- 23.4 to 136.0 +/- 30.2 mmHg. In contrast, BP continued to rise in rats given dextrose chronically ranging, on the 5th day, from 163.6 +/- 23.8 to 180.4 +/- 22.5 mmHg. Both the fall in pressure after acute captopril and that after chronic captopril were related to pre-treatment levels of plasma renin concentration. These results suggest that in the two-kidney, one clip hypertensive rat ANG II, in addition to its acute vasoconstrictor property, contribute to the hypertension through a secondary effect, the mechanism of which is as yet uncertain.     

Effect of captopril injection in patients with moderate to severe hypertension

The effect of intravenous captopril was studied in 24 white patients who had moderate to severe hypertension. Patients received incremental doses of 1 to 10 mg delivered at 10 min intervals over 50 to 80 min. Blood pressure (BP) was lowered within 5 to 10 min after the initial dose was administered and continued to decline, reaching a maximum response after 20 min (2 to 4 mg). At this time group mean BP fell from 175 +/- 3/111 +/- 1 to 166 +/- 3/97 +/- 2 mm Hg (P less than 0.01). Additional dose increments to an average cumulative dose of 40 mg did not increase the initial effect. No adverse side effects or symptomatic hypotension occurred in any subject. There was a significant correlation between diastolic BP decreases observed in response to intravenous captopril and subsequent long-term oral captopril therapy. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide increased the proportion of patients reaching normotension. We conclude that small intravenous bolus injections of captopril appear to be effective rapidly and are well tolerated in moderate to severe essential hypertension. Short-term intravenous administration seems to predict the response to chronic oral captopril therapy.     

Clinical significance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Evaluation of severity of hypertension, efficacy of treatment and effects on nighttime blood pressure

Blood pressure (BP) obtained by the physician in his office and ambulatory BP recorded every hour throughout 24 hours with a noninvasive automated BP monitoring device were compared in 10 normotensives and 162 hypertensives. Casual BPs significantly correlated with averages in ambulatory BPs (ABPs) throughout the whole day, day (7 am - 10 pm) and night (0-5 am). However, it was noted that 6 of 10 normotensives and all of the moderate to severe hypertensives had ABPs of more than 150/90 mmHg at least once during the 24-hour period. The incidence of ABPs greater than 150/90 mmHg among all readings was higher in untreated and treated hypertensives with diastolic BPs in the office of more than 105 mmHg, and, when checked along with the clock time, higher not only in the morning but also in the evening. On the other hand, one-third or one-fifth of treated hypertensives with diastolic office BPs less than 90 mmHg or between 90 and 105 mmHg respectively had ABPs less than 150/90 mmHg throughout the whole day. When the effect of nicardipine (60 mg, t.i.d.) or slow-release nifedipine (27.3 +/- 3.0 mg, b.i.d.) on minimum BP during the night was analyzed, long-acting nifedipine decreased BP throughout the night to levels not significantly different from normotensive controls, whereas short-acting nicardipine did not affect nighttime BPs. These results suggest that simple ABP monitoring throughout the day gives us useful information to evaluate the severity of hypertension and the efficacy of antihypertensive medication as well as to avoid overtreatment with long-acting hypotensive agents resulting in a great fall in BP during sleep.     

Twice-daily administration of oral verapamil in the treatment of essential hypertension

The antihypertensive effect of twice-daily administration of verapamil hydrochloride was evaluated in 21 adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Following four weeks of placebo therapy, verapamil was given for four weeks with a treatment goal of sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) of less than 90 mm Hg, or to a maximum dose of 160 mg twice daily. Sitting and standing BPs, heart rate, and verapamil plasma levels were determined weekly, ten to 12 hours post dose. At the maximal dose (mean, 154 +/- 19.2 mg), heart rate was not affected, side effects were minimal, and sitting diastolic BP was significantly reduced from placebo baseline, with 12 of 21 patients having a fall in sitting diastolic BP of 10 mm Hg or more or less than 90 mm Hg. A trough verapamil plasma level of greater than 80 ng/mL was associated with a good hypotensive response. These data indicate the safety and utility of twice-daily verapamil administration for the treatment of essential hypertension and suggest the value of obtaining verapamil plasma levels as a guide to dosage determination.     

A randomized comparison of isradipine slow release given once daily with isradipine twice daily on 24 hour blood pressure in hypertensive patients.

Isradipine, a new calcium channel blocker, was given to 32 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a run-in period of three weeks, 32 patients were randomized double-blindly to six weeks' treatment with either isradipine 2.5 mg twice daily or isradipine 5.0 mg once daily in a modified release formulation. Based on conventional 'clinic' BP measurements 12 or 24 hours postdose, the two treatments resulted in clinically relevant BP reduction (16/11 and 19/15 mmHg) without reflex tachycardia. No differences were seen between the groups. Efficacy increased throughout the study period. By determination of the 24 hour BP profile with a noninvasive method, the two groups were comparable during the placebo period, and no differences were seen between the two treatments. Both treatments resulted in satisfactory BP reduction during 24 hours (daily reduction of 4/6 and 12/9 mmHg twice daily and once daily dosing respectively). One third of the patients had 'white-coat' hypertension based on ambulatory daytime mean BPs, compared with conventional measurements. No relationship was found between the initial BP lowering effect and the effect after long-term treatment with isradipine in either dose.     

Captopril versus perindopril: a double blind study in essential hypertension

This was a double blind, parallel group, multicentre comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and acceptability of perindopril and captopril in essential hypertension. After one month of placebo, 165 patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 125 mmHg were randomised to perindopril 4 mg once daily or captopril 25 mg twice daily orally. The perindopril group (n = 82) had significantly higher pretreatment DBP (105.4 +/- 0.8 mmHg vs 102.3 +/- 0.6 mmHg) but other demographic variables were similar. Assessment was monthly for three months: 'uncontrolled' patients (DBP greater than 90 mmHg) had the dose doubled and then hydrochlorothiazide added. Two of the six withdrawals were attributed to drug side effects and were in the captopril group. There was no significant difference in the number of withdrawals or incidence of side effects between the drugs. The final titrated treatments were similar and monotherapy normalised DBP in 49% of each group. The final 'control' rate was higher with perindopril than captopril: 75% vs 57%, P = 0.016. The overall fall in DBP was greater in the perindopril group: 26.5 +/- 1.9 mmHg vs 18.9 +/- 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.005. The doses of diuretic were similar in the two groups. The DBP of patients who received only monotherapy for three months also fell more in the perindopril group (-17.5 +/- 1.4 mmHg vs -13.9 +/- 1.0 mmHg, P less than 0.01). At the doses studied, perindopril was more effective than captopril in lowering DBP, either as monotherapy or in combination with a diuretic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Efficacy and tolerability of a combination tablet of candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide in insufficiently controlled primary hypertension--comparison with a combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide

This randomized, double-blind study compared the antihypertensive effect, safety and tolerability of a candesartan cilexetil/hydrochlorothiazide (candesartan/HCT; 16/12.5 mg) combination tablet with that of a losartan/HCT (50/12.5 mg) combination tablet in patients with mild-to-moderate primary hypertension insufficiently controlled on previous monotherapy. Men and women, aged 20-80 years, with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 90 and < or = 110 mmHg and sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) < or = 200 mmHg during treatment with any kind of antihypertensive monotherapy for at least 4 weeks were randomized to candesartan/HCT or losartan/HCT once daily for 12 weeks. All BP measurements were performed 24 h after previous dose. Mean values and standard deviations (SD) or confidence intervals (CI) are given. A total of 340 patients were enrolled, of whom 299 (144 women and 155 men, mean age 59.5 [10.5] years) were randomized to candesartan/HCT (n = 151) or losartan/HCT (n = 148). BPs at randomization were 159.5 (15.4)/98.4 (5.8)mmHg and 160.5 (16.1)/98.5 (5.4)mmHg, respectively. There was a greater reduction in BP with candesartan/HCT than with losartan/HCT: DBP -10.4 (-11.8; -8.9) vs -7.8 (-9.3; -6.3) mmHg, difference between treatments -2.6 (-4.7; -0.5) mmHg (p = 0.016); SBP -19.4 (-22.1; -16.7) vs - 13.7 (-16.5; - 10.9) mmHg, difference between treatments -5.7 (-9.6; -1.8) mmHg (p = 0.004). The proportion of patients achieving a DBP < or = 90 mmHg was greater in the candesartan/HCT group: 60.9 (53.1; 68.7) vs 49.3 (41.3; 57.4)% (p = 0.044). There were 12 withdrawals in the candesartan/HCT group, of which 8 were due to adverse events, and 17 and 12, respectively in the losartan/HCT group. We conclude that the combination of candesartan and HCT reduces BP effectively and is well tolerated. BP was normalized in 61% of these patients who had insufficient response to previous monotherapy. The reduction in BP and the proportion of patients with normalized BP were greater with the candesartan/HCT 16/12.5 mg combination than with the losartan/ HCT 50/12.5 mg combination.     

Effects of a low dose of indapamide, a diuretic, given daily or every-other-day on blood pressure and metabolic parameters.

To investigate the effects of the diuretic, indapamide, on blood pressure (BP) and metabolic parameters, thirty hypertensive patients were treated with 1 mg of indapamide either every day or every other day. BP, fasting plasma glucose, lipids, serum potassium and uric acid were determined at baseline and after 3 months of a stable regimen of the drug. At the termination of the study, 48-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed. Three patients received only indapamide, while other patients were treated in combination with additional antihypertensive medications. Patients treated with daily indapamide showed a BP reduction from 162 +/- 2.9/85 +/- 2.4 mmHg to 134 +/- 2.4/71 +/-2.6 mmHg (p < 0.001). The BP reduction was similar in those patients receiving the drug every other day (137 +/- 3.4/71 +/- 3.6 mmHg). While plasma lipids and serum potassium did not differ significantly with the intervention, uric acid increased significantly with daily treatment and normalized with every-other-day treatment. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was not altered (5.6 +/- 0.1% vs. 5.4 +/- 0.2%), and did not differ between patients with and without diabetes mellitus. ABPM revealed an average 24-h BP of 134 +/- 3.3/75 +/- 1.7 mmHg on days in which patients received the medication and 139 +/- 4.9/78 +/- 2.6 mmHg on the intervening day without indapamide (no significant difference). These results suggest that a low dose of indapamide given every day or every other day is effective in lowering BP and does not result in metabolic derangements.     

复方缬沙坦与血脂康联合治疗原发性高血压的临床研究

目的评价复方缬沙坦(缬沙坦80mg/氢氯噻嗪12.5mg)联合血脂康(600mg)治疗轻、中度原发性高血压患者的疗效和安全性。方法采用随机、双盲对照研究。将280例轻、中度高血压患者随机分为缬沙坦组和对照组。缬沙坦组患者给予复方缬沙坦(缬沙坦80mg/氢氯噻嗪12.5mg,1次/d)和血脂康(600mg,2次/d)治疗,对照组患者降压药物单用缬沙坦(80mg,1次/d)。治疗中每周测量血压。在治疗8周和结束时评价药物安全性和有效性。结果对于轻、中度原发性高血压患者,缬沙坦组较对照组血压进一步下降,达标率显著高于对照组。治疗结束时平均坐位收缩压均降低5mmHg,平均坐位舒张压多下降3mmHg,缬沙坦组和对照组患者中,血压控制<140/90mmHg者分别占54.1%和40.7%。结论轻、中度原发性高血压患者采用复方缬沙坦联合血脂康治疗,降压效果和达标率均优于单用缬沙坦。     

The effect of spironolactone, cilazapril and their combination on albuminuria in patients with hypertension and diabetic nephropathy is independent of blood pressure reduction: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of spironolactone, cilazapril and their combination on albuminuria was examined in a randomized prospective study in female patients with diabetes and hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty female diabetic patients aged 45-70 years with blood pressure (BP) 140-180/90-110 mmHg, serum creatinine (sCr) < or = 160 micro mol/l, HbA(1c) < or = 10%, and albuminuria were treated by atenolol 12.5-75 mg/d and hydrochlorothiazide 6.25-25 mg/d. Titration-to-target helped to reach BP values < or = 135/85 mmHg in 46 patients after 12 weeks. These patients were randomized to spironolactone 100 mg/d or cilazapril 5 mg/d for 24 weeks. Then both groups received spironolactone 50 mg/d and cilazapril 2.5 mg/d for 24 weeks. BP was stabilized by tapering the dose of the initial agents. Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), BP, K(+). sCr and HbA(1c) were assessed at baseline and at weeks 12, 16, 36 and 60. RESULTS: The average BP at week 12 was 128 +/- 4/81 +/- 3 mmHg and remained constant, in both groups, throughout the study. ACR declined on spironolactone from a median value (range) of 452 (124-1571) to 216 (64-875) mg/g (P = 0.001), and on cilazapril to 302 (90-975) mg/g (P = 0.001). The difference between spironolactone and cilazapril was significant (P = 0.002). Combined treatment resulted in a further modest decline in ACR. Serum creatinine was unaltered by spironolactone and rose slightly (121 to 126 micro mol/l, P = 0.02) on cilazapril. CONCLUSION: At the doses tested, spironolactone was superior to cilazapril in reducing albuminuria. Combined administration was more effective than either drug alone. These effects were independent of BP values. Hyperkalaemia was the main side-effect.     

Minoxidil, nadolol, and a diuretic. Once-a-day therapy for resistant hypertension

We tested a once-a-day antihypertensive regimen using minoxidil, nadolol, and a diuretic in 55 patients with resistant hypertension. Forty-seven patients had evidence of end-organ damage. Twelve had mild renal insufficiency (serum creatinine concentration, 2.5 +/- 0.3 mg/dL). In 34 patients, treatment with nadolol and a diuretic was started with minoxidil added one to four weeks later. In the remainder, minoxidil, nadolol, and a diuretic were begun simultaneously because of severe hypertension. Initial supine and standing blood pressure (BP) in the 55 patients were 186 +/- 4/111 +/- 2 and 180 +/- 4/108 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively. After 7 +/- 1 weeks, BP was controlled in 46 patients (84%) with the supine and standing BP reduced to 140 +/- 3/80 +/- 1 and 134 +/- 3/80 +/- 1, respectively. In six patients, BP was controlled but intolerable side effects occurred, making the regimen therapeutically successful in 40 patients (73%). The BP remained controlled during a follow-up of 43 +/- 5 weeks. In 31 patients, BPs measured 24 hours after the last dose were not different from random measurements. Mean serum creatinine levels remained stable in the 12 patients with renal insufficiency.     

Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of the combination delapril plus indapamide in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: a randomised,multicentre, controlled study

The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of two different fixed combinations of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a diuretic: delapril+indapamide (D+I) and captopril+hydrochlorothiazide (C+H) administered for 6 months to patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. In all, 96 centres participated in this randomised, parallel groups, controlled study. A total of 829 patients with uncomplicated mild to moderate hypertension were randomised, and 790 were eligible for the analysis of efficacy (intention to treat). Patients of both sexes, aged 18-75 years, newly diagnosed or untreated during the last month were included in the study if their diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was > or =95 and < or =114 mmHg. The starting doses of the drugs were delapril 30 mg+indapamide 1.25 mg tablets o.d. or captopril 50 mg+hydrolchlorothiazide 15 mg tablets o.d. After a 1-month treatment period, nonresponders (DBP >90 mmHg, or decrease in DBP <10 mmHg) had the daily dose increased to either delapril 30 mg+indapamide 2.5 mg or captopril 50 mg+hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg tablets for a further 5 months. The primary assessment of antihypertensive efficacy was the percentage of patients who responded after a 6-month drug treatment. The responder rates were 72.6% with D+I and 62.9% with C+H (P=0.004 between treatments) after 60 days of treatment, and 92.6% in the D+I and 85.2% in the C+H (P<0.001 between treatments) at the end of the treatment period. The final value of systolic blood pressure was 134.5+/-13.1 mmHg with D+I and 138.3+/-14.0 mmHg with C+H (P<0.001 between treatments). At the final visit, DBP was 84.57+/-7.0 mmHg in the D+I group and 85.57+/-8.0 mmHg in the control group (P=0.017 between treatments). In all, 11 patients in the D+I group and 19 patients in the C+H group were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events. In all, 30 patients (7.6%) with D+I and 32 patients (8.1%) with C+H experienced adverse events. In conclusion, D+I was more effective than C+H in terms of overall reduction in blood pressure and response rate. Greater efficacy was obtained without any increase in adverse effects, since both treatments were equally well tolerated.     

Comparison of antihypertensive effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, a calcium antagonist and a diuretic in patients with hypertension not controlled by angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the additional antihypertensive effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist and a diuretic in patients whose hypertension is not controlled by full-dose angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: Individuals with an ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) that was not controlled by valsartan 160 mg once daily were allocated randomly to two groups: those in group A (n = 35) were assigned randomly to treatment with benazepril 20 mg once daily or chlorthalidone 12.5 mg once daily, whereas patients in group B (n = 29) were assigned randomly to benazepril 20 mg once daily or amlodipine 5 mg once daily. All individuals continued to receive background valsartan 160 mg once daily. After 5 weeks, patients crossed over to the alternative valsartan-based combination treatment of each group for a second 5-week period. Twenty-four-hour ABP monitoring was performed before the random allocation to groups and at the end of each randomized combination pharmacotherapy period. RESULTS: Sixty-four individuals completed the study: 32 men and 32 women (mean +/- SD age 48.2 +/- 7.9 years, average 24-h ABP on valsartan monotherapy 143.4 +/- 12.6/87.7 +/- 7.8 mmHg). Significant additional antihypertensive effects on the average 24-h ABP were obtained with benazepril (8.6 +/- 8.8/6.3 +/- 6.7 mmHg), amlodipine (15.2 +/- 12.9/9.9 +/- 6.8 mmHg) and chlorthalidone (13.5 +/- 11.6/9.5 +/- 7.7 mmHg) (P < 0.001 for all additional antihypertensive effects). The additional effects of amlodipine and chlorthalidone added to valsartan were approximately 6/3.5 mmHg (P < 0.05) greater than that of benazepril. CONCLUSIONS: In patients in whom hypertension was not controlled by full-dose ARB monotherapy, a diuretic, a calcium antagonist or an ACE inhibitor provided significant additional antihypertensive effect. The antihypertensive effects of the ARB-diuretic and the ARB-calcium antagonist combinations were superior to that of the ARB-ACE inhibitor combination.     

The use of captopril and captopril plus frusemide as antihypertensive agents in non-insulin dependent diabetes

After all previous antihypertensive treatment had been stopped, blood pressure and glucose tolerance were measured in 16 hypertensive non-insulin treated diabetics before and again six weeks after treatment with captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Supine blood pressure fell from 184 +/- 4.1/103 +/- 2.6 to 165 +/- 5.2/88 +/- 2.1 mmHg (P less than 0.001) and erect from 179 +/- 5.2/102 +/- 3.2 to 158 +/- 5.6/87 +/- 2.6 mmHg (P less than 0.005). The area under the oral glucose tolerance curve fell from 2313.6 +/- 154 to 2192.8 +/- 146 mmol/min/l (P less than 0.02). There was no change in plasma insulin, total glycosylated haemoglobin or fructosamine. Four patients who failed to show lowering of supine diastolic pressure below 95 mmHg were additionally given oral frusemide with further improvement in blood pressure and no alteration in carbohydrate intolerance. It was concluded that captopril alone is usually an effective antihypertensive agent in non-insulin dependent diabetes with the addition of frusemide benefiting resistant cases. Glucose intolerance did not worsen with either captopril alone or captopril plus frusemide.