Reluctance to undergo predictive testing: The case of Huntington Disease

The development of a presymptomatic test for Huntington Disease (HD) has enabled some persons at risk to determine whether or not they are gene carriers. The purpose of this study was to explore the reasons why those at risk choose not to be tested in a situation where testing is available and most of the test-associated costs are covered by state funding. Subjects were also asked their levels of knowledge about testing, attitudes towards aspects of the testing protocols, and intentions towards testing once the gene for HD is found. Sixty-six individuals at risk for HD who had chosen not to be tested completed a mailed questionnaire. The most important reasons for not being tested were increased risk to children if one was found to be a gene carrier, absence of an effective cure, potential loss of health insurance, financial costs of testing, and the inability to “unndo” the knowledge. Individuals comprising this sample were quite knowledgeable about predictive testing. Most supported the availability of testing despite the lack of a cure, the need for special counseling prior to testing, and the idea that testing should be a voluntary decision. Most said they would take the test if a treatment was available, if the mechanics of the test were simplified, or if the test was 100% accurate. The risk to relatives, lack of treatment or cure, fear of losing one's health insurance, and the accuracy of the information to be gained from testing are important factors in the decision not to be tested. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Attitudes of neurologists, psychiatrists, and psychotherapists towards predictive testing for Huntington''s disease in Germany.

Predictive testing for Huntington's disease (HD) in Germany is performed by genetic counsellors, neurologists, psychiatrists, and psychotherapists. In order to evaluate the attitudes of neurologists, psychiatrists, and psychotherapists in Germany towards predictive testing for HD, a postal questionnaire was sent to this group. Two German Bundesländer were chosen, Baden Württemberg (BW) and Niedersachsen (NS). Of 469 persons interviewed the response rate was 32.6%. The questionnaire consisted of 17 items assessing sociodemographic data, acquaintance with HD patients, lay organisations, attitudes towards genetic counselling, presymptomatic and prenatal DNA testing, and reproduction of persons at risk for HD. More than 70% of the subjects were well informed about predictive DNA testing but knowledge about the details of the test procedure, especially the World Federation of Neurology (WFN) and International Huntington Association (IHA)1 recommendations, was quite low (11.8%). Nevertheless, the majority would recommend predictive testing for HD although they anticipated problems for the probands. The majority of our respondents favoured psychological test and post-test counselling for those tested. Concerning reproduction, most subjects favoured prenatal testing or that persons at risk should refrain from having children. We found that the opinions of practitioners and at risk persons differed with respect to the predictive DNA test and, particularly, to prenatal testing. Therefore the testing procedure could be improved if practitioners were better informed about the DNA test in general and about the attitudes and wishes of their patients.     

At-risk persons' attitudes toward presymptomatic and prenatal testing of Huntington disease in Michigan

One hundred fifty-five individuals at 50% risk of inheriting Huntington disease (HD) were given a questionnaire surveying their sociodemographic characteristics, experience with HD, and attitudes toward presymptomatic and prenatal testing in HD. About two-thirds (63.2%) of the persons indicated they would take a presymptomatic test even if no specific treatment was available. Although one-half (49%) of the respondents stated they would make use of a prenatal test, only 43% of these individuals would decide to terminate a heterozygous fetus. Presymptomatic test results indicating carrier status would influence some of the respondents' decisions about marriage and childbearing. This strong interest of at-risk persons to make use of both presymptomatic and prenatal diagnosis in HD indicates the need for well-organized testing programs. These programs must be designed to address the genetic, psychosocial, and ethical issues that may arise in the use of this type of genetic test.     

Intended use of predictive testing by those at risk for Huntington disease

Huntington disease (HD) is a late-onset genetic disorder that is incurable and undetectable until the onset of symptoms. A marker for the gene that causes HD was recently discovered that will lead to a predictive test. The purpose of this research was to assess the attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral intentions concerning the impending predictive test by those at risk for HD. Results from a sample of 56 at-risk individuals indicated that a majority (65%) favored using the presymptomatic test and would encourage their adult children to use it as well. Fewer but still a substantial percentage of respondents would use the prenatal test (42%) and would test at-risk minors (35%). Surprisingly, knowledge about predictive testing was quite low and a majority of those least knowledgeable about predictive testing intended to use the test. These findings emphasized the need for outreach and prevention efforts to prepare the at risk and specialized programs of genetic counseling and follow up to accompany predictive testing.     

Understanding the decision to take the predictive test for Huntington disease.

The predictive test for Huntington disease (HD) has allowed those at risk to determine gene status prior to symptoms. The purpose of this research was to understand the motivation and the anticipated reactions of those requesting the test. Forty persons at 50% risk for HD and 31 companions participated in a structured personal interview as part of the predictive test protocol. Reasons for taking the test centered on the reduction of anxiety and uncertainty associated with being at risk and enhanced planning and decision making. Participants also believed that taking the test would produce more positive than negative outcomes. With a favorable result, most anticipated a reduction of anxiety, a more normal future, and relief knowing their children would be at a very low risk. Most also cited benefits as more likely than consequences with an unfavorable result. Making the most of life, easier planning, and reduced uncertainty were rated as more likely than any of the adverse impacts, including short-term depression and becoming frightened. Almost all participants (95%) said they would rather learn that they have the HD gene than remain at 50% risk. The uncertainty, anxiety, and chronic stress associated with being at risk appears to underlie the motivation of many seeking the predictive test for HD.     

Understanding the decision to take the predictive test for Huntington disease

The predictive test for Huntington disease (HD) has allowed those at risk to determine gene status prior to symptoms. The purpose of this research was to understand the motivation and the anticipated reactions of those requesting the test. Forty persons at 50% risk for HD and 31 companions participated in a structured personal interview as part of the predictive test protocol. Reasons for taking the test centered on the reduction of anxiety and uncertainty associated with being at risk and enhanced planning and decision making. Participants also believed that taking the test would produce more positive than negative outcomes. With a favorable result, most anticipated a reduction of anxiety, a more normal future, and relief knowing their children would be at a very low risk. Most also cited benefits as more likely than consequences with an unfavorable result. Making the most of life, easier planning, and reduced uncertainty were rated as more likely than any of the adverse impacts, including short-term depression and becoming frightened. Almost all participants (95%) said they would rather learn that they have the HD gene than remain at 50% risk. The uncertainty, anxiety, and chronic stress associated with being at risk appears to underlie the motivation of many seeking the predictive test for HD.     

Psychosocial impact of predictive testing for myotonic dystrophy type 1

In the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region (Quebec, Canada), a predictive DNA-testing program for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) has been available as a clinical service since 1988. From 1 to 12 years (median, 5 years) after receiving predictive testing, a total of 308 participants (44 carriers and 264 non-carriers) answered a questionnaire to determine the psychosocial impact of this genetic testing. The main reasons for wanting to be tested were to learn if children are at risk for DM1 or for reproductive decision making (75%) and to relieve the uncertainty for themselves (17%). The majority of participants (96.1%) remembered correctly their test result. At the time of the survey, the perception of the general well-being, the psychological distress (Psychiatric Symptom Index), and the self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) were similar in carriers, in non-carriers, and in the reference (Quebec) population. When participants indicated a change in different aspects of their lives following predictive testing, it was perceived as a change for the better by non-carriers and as a change for the worse by carriers. Nevertheless, for a majority of carriers and of non-carriers, the test result did not bring changes in their lives. All respondents believed that predictive testing should be available for the at-risk population and the vast majority of carrier and of non-carriers would recommend the use of predictive testing to their family members. Predictive testing for individuals at-risk of DM1 can be offered safely within a well-organized clinical and genetic counseling program that includes careful pre-test counseling, pre-test clinical assessment, post-test psychological support, and follow-up for those identified as carriers.     

Attitudes toward presymptomatic testing in Huntington disease

One hundred thirty-one individuals at 50% risk of inheriting Huntington disease (HD) responded to a survey to study their attitudes toward taking a genetic test based on the identification of a genetically linked DNA polymorphism. Ninety-six percent of the respondents believe that presymptomatic testing should be available, and 66% say they will use it themselves. Fewer married individuals, in comparison to those single, separated, and divorced, intend to take the test. Many respondents (40%) said their primary reason for wanting to be tested is to end the uncertainty in their lives. Results suggest that there will be self-selection in test use, with many individuals who believe they will be depressed or possibly suicidal with a positive test result deciding not to be tested or unsure about testing. However, 15% of those who want to be tested acknowledge that they may be at risk for suicide if they are probable gene carriers. Only 12% of all respondents say they will be likely to use prenatal testing, suggesting that initial demand may be low in New England. Implementation of presymptomatic testing challenges health care providers to develop strategies to care for otherwise healthy persons who will be given a diagnosis years before the onset of illness.     

Potential impact of a predictive test on the gene frequency of Huntington disease

Fifty-five individuals at 50% risk of inheriting Huntington disease (HD) were given in-depth structured interviews to survey attitudes toward use of a predictive test and to assess the possible impact of such a test on the number of gene carriers born. Three-quarters of the sample said they would take predictive test. Given a positive predictive or prenatal test, the number of individuals choosing to have children is reduced from 80% of the total sample to 42%, or by almost one-half. The large proportion of at risk individuals who say they would use a predictive test underscores the importance of developing guidelines for its administration prior to implementation.     

Five year study of prenatal testing for Huntington''s disease: demand, attitudes, and psychological assessment.

Adult predictive and prenatal testing programmes for Huntington's disease (HD) in Canada have been available since 1986. However, the demand for prenatal testing and the reasons why some people choose not to have the prenatal test for this late onset disorder have not been well documented. In addition, the knowledge and attitudes of adult predictive testing candidates and their partners about prenatal testing are not well known nor are the psychological effects of prenatal testing well understood. As of September 1991, 425 subjects had entered the Canadian Collaborative Study of Predictive Testing and, of these, 47 subjects or their partners had become pregnant. Of this group, 14 (30%) couples requested prenatal testing, 24 (51%) couples did not want prenatal testing, and nine (19%) at risk subjects had already received a decreased risk through adult predictive testing and, therefore, were not eligible for the prenatal test. Of the 14 couples who initially requested prenatal testing, seven withdrew. Thus, demand for the prenatal test by eligible candidates was 7/38 or 18%, which is much lower than the 32 to 65% expected based on early survey data. The most frequently cited reason for declining prenatal testing was the hope that a cure would be found in time for their children. While the majority of adult predictive testing candidates (71%) in our study had accurate information about definitive prenatal testing, many (63%) did not have a correct understanding of exclusion prenatal testing. Although no serious adverse events such as suicide planning or admission to psychiatric hospital have occurred, a particular need for careful counselling was identified for those at risk candidates and their partners who have one prenatal test and feel compelled to use the test again in future pregnancies. Even though prenatal testing for HD is not requested as often originally expected, it still remains a desired option for some at risk persons and their partners.     

Psychosocial impact of predictive testing for Huntington disease on support persons

Although a support person is required by many centers during the predictive testing protocol for Huntington disease (HD), little is known about the psychosocial impact of predictive testing on persons serving in this role. Eighteen adults who were support persons during predictive HD testing in one HD testing center completed a semi-structured interview to describe their experiences. Participants also completed the Impact of Events Scale (IES) to assess perceptions of emotional distress regarding predictive testing and the State Anxiety Scale of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) to assess anxiety regarding the interview. State anxiety scores were similar to normative values for working adults. Although support persons for individuals with a positive gene test scored higher on all measures of the IES than those who were support persons for persons with negative gene mutation results, these differences were not statistically significant. Support persons identified aspects of the protocol that did not fit their needs, perceived the testing process as extending into subsequent caregiving responsibilities when the test was positive, and were uninformed regarding specific caregiving issues for family members with the gene mutation. The impact of the testing experience appeared to be most intense for those support persons who were at-risk offspring of probands. Findings suggest that individual assessment of support person needs may allow more focused counseling of support persons during predictive genetic HD testing. Collaboration with health care providers may facilitate symptom management following testing.     

Predictive,pre-natal and diagnostic genetic testing for Huntington's disease: the experience in Canada from 1987 to 2000

Predictive and pre-natal testing for Huntington's Disease (HD) has been available since 1987. Initially this was offered by linkage analysis, which was surpassed by the advent of the direct mutation test for HD in 1993. Direct mutation analysis provided an accurate test that not only enhanced predictive and pre-natal testing, but also permitted the diagnostic testing of symptomatic individuals. The objective of this study was to investigate the uptake, utilization, and outcome of predictive, pre-natal and diagnostic testing in Canada from 1987 to April 1, 2000. A retrospective design was used; all Canadian medical genetics centres and their affiliated laboratories offering genetic testing for HD were invited to participate. A total of 15 of 22 centres (68.2%), currently offering or ever having offered genetic testing for HD, responded, providing data on test results, demographics, and clinical history. A total of 1061 predictive tests, 15 pre-natal tests, and 626 diagnostic tests were performed. The uptake for predictive testing was approximately 18% of the estimated at-risk Canadian population, ranging from 12.5% in the Maritimes to 20.7% in British Columbia. There appears to have been a decline in the rate of testing in recent years. Of the predictive tests, 45.0% of individuals were found to have an increased risk, and a preponderance of females (60.2%) sought testing. A greater proportion of those at < or = 25% risk sought predictive testing once direct CAG mutation analysis had become available (10.9% after mutation analysis vs 4.7% before mutation analysis, p = 0.0077). Very few pre-natal tests were requested. Of the 15 pre-natal tests, 12 had an increased risk, resulting in termination of pregnancy in all but one. Diagnostic testing identified 68.5% of individuals to be positive by mutation analysis, while 31.5% of those with HD-like symptoms were not found to have the HD mutation. The positive diagnostic tests included 24.5% of individuals with no known prior family history of HD.     

The choice not to undergo genetic testing for Huntington disease: Results from the PHAROS study

Rates of genetic testing in Huntington disease (HD) are lower than was predicted before direct DNA testing became available. Clinicians often do not have in-depth conversations with people at risk who chose not to test. We queried 733 research subjects who chose not to learn their HD gene status when enrolling in the Prospective Huntington At-Risk Observational Study, carried out between 1999 and 2008. Lack of an effective cure or treatment (66% of subjects) and inability to undo knowledge (66%) were the major reasons cited for choosing not to undergo HD DNA testing. Most subjects were not concerned about the length or burden of the testing process (61% and 59%, respectively). Subjects were optimistic that a treatment to improve symptoms or postpone onset would be developed within the next 10 years (56% and 53%, respectively), but they had less certainty about the prospects to prevent HD onset (36%). This is the first large, systematic study of why people at risk for HD choose not to undergo genetic testing. Attitudes about how people at risk for HD approach this life-altering choice should be reassessed as new treatments develop, and as clinical trials now require genetic testing at entry.     

Psychosocial factors predicting BRCA1/BRCA2 testing decisions in members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families

Although BRCA1/2 testing has increasingly entered clinical practice, much is to be learned about the most effective ways to provide counseling to persons potentially interested in receiving test results. The purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting genetic testing decisions in a cohort of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families presented with the choice to undergo testing. Relatives in these families are known to carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Sociodemographics, personality traits, and family functioning were self-assessed using validated psychometric instruments at baseline. Among 172 individuals who participated in pretest education and counseling, 135 (78%) chose to undergo genetic testing and 37 (22%) chose not to be tested. Individuals who chose to undergo genetic testing were more likely to be older (> or =40 years), to have lower levels of optimism, and to report higher levels of cohesiveness in their families. A better understanding of factors that influence interest in predictive testing may help to inform the counseling that occurs prior to genetic testing.     

Psychological costs and benefits of predictive testing for Huntington's disease

The impact of predictive genetic testing for Huntington's disease (HD) was assessed in 68 persons at high (n = 17) or low risk (n = 51) for the disease at one to six years following disclosure of test results. There was consensus in both groups that knowledge of HD genetic status was beneficial. A majority of persons felt relief from wondering and uncertainty. High-risk persons identified greater family closeness and financial security. For low-risk persons, the knowledge that their children were spared offered great consolation. Negative effects in high-risk persons were psychological burden (worry, guilt). Even for low-risk subjects, there was a period of adjustment and, in some, disappointment that low risk had not alleviated problems unrelated to HD. Although the majority of marriages were unaffected by testing, some persons in both groups reported that their marriages sustained positive or negative impact. Despite mixed consequences, most did not regret being tested. The benefits of testing appear to outweigh its drawbacks, at least among this self-selected group of research participants. We also must conclude, however, that predictive genetic testing will result in negative as well as positive consequences, regardless of test outcome. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

On attitudes and appreciation 6 months after predictive DNA testing for huntington disease in the Dutch program

We have studied the 6-month follow-up attitudes of 63 individuals, after predictive testing for Huntington disease (HD). Reducing uncertainty (81%) and family planning (60%) were the major reasons for taking the test. Twenty-four individuals were diagnosed as having an increased risk (± 98%), and 39 a decreased risk (± 2%). Among those with an increased risk, denial or minimization of the ultimate impact of the increased risk result was observed. Most of them (84%) rated their current life situation, at the very least, as being good. Twenty-one percent of individuals with an increased risk who originally planned to have a family, decided to refrain from having children. Sixty percent of those with increased risk who still wished to have children, would choose to have prenatal testing. In most individuals with increased risk, the test result did not increase the previously expected control over their own future. Half of the partners of persons with increased risk acknowledged the burden of the future disease. Half had no one in whom they could confide. They showed loyalty to the denial and avoidance reactions of their spouses. Half of the individuals with decreased risk denied the impact of the result, as reflected by absence of relief, and emotional numbness. A third of persons with decreased risk experienced involvement with problems of affected relatives. We found that 20% of all participants were discontented with the support given by their general practitioner, who is normally regarded as being the most significant professional for aftercare. Our findings suggest that the perpetuation of psychological defenses, which may temporarily be adequate, may ultimately prevent an individual from taking advantage of being informed. These questions should be further addressed in long-term follow-up studies. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Psychological functioning before predictive testing for Huntington's disease: the role of the parental disease, risk perception, and subjective proximity of the disease

BACKGROUND: Psychometric testing of participants in predictive DNA testing for Huntington's disease (HD) has shown that 15% of the subjects at risk for HD had at least mild depression or a high score for general anxiety or both in the pre-test period. The main aim of the study was the delineation of variables associated with pre-test distress of applicants for predictive testing for HD. Based on theoretical considerations, four specific hypotheses were tested regarding the role of (1) the test participant's age at the (perceived) parental onset of HD, (2) the affected parent's sex, (3) the perception of the risk for HD, and (4) the subjective proximity of the disease. Secondly, these four variables were used in multiple regression analyses to select the best predictors of pre- and post-test psychological functioning (one year after the test). Increasing the understanding of pre- and post-test distress is important for developing better counselling and support strategies for test applicants. METHODS: Data were collected by means of clinical interviews and psychometric questionnaires during the pre- and post-test (one year after the test) counselling sessions for predictive testing for HD. RESULTS: We found significant associations of the participant's age at the parental onset, the subjective proximity of the disease onset, and the perceived risk with pre-test psychometric measures of psychological functioning. Multiple regression analyses showed that the best predictors of pre-test functioning were the perceived proximity of the disease onset and its interaction with risk perception. Regarding post-test functioning, none of the proposed variables had a unique contribution beyond that accounted for by pre-test psychological functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Test participants who are close to the perceived age of onset of HD and who have a pessimistic risk perception should be given special attention during pre-test counselling because of their possible negative affective condition at that time. Pre-test psychological measures were the best predictors of post-test distress, irrespective of the test result. Suggestions for future longitudinal research are formulated. This kind of research should enable clinical geneticists and mental health professionals to refine the pre- and post-test counselling strategies for predictive DNA testing, not only for HD, but also for other incurable late onset disorders.     

Attitudes of Dutch general practitioners towards presymptomatic DNA-testing for Huntington disease

The attitudes of 1020 Dutch GP's towards presymptomatic and prenatal testing for Huntington disease (HD) were studied by means of a postal questionnaire. The questionnaire contained questions about: approval of presymptomatic DNA-testing, informing individuals at-risk who do not request predictive testing, referral to a clinical genetics center, and opinions about different strategies of informing and supporting individuals at-risk. The response rate was 62%. More than two-thirds of the GP's considered post-test counselling and support as their responsibility. Twenty-six per cent were of the opinion that the test results should be disclosed by the GP. Fifty-nine per cent of GP's who had an individual at-risk in their practice were familiar with the test. The attitudes of GP's towards giving support and giving test results were independent of familiarity with the test and the incidence of HD-patients or at-risk individuals in the practice. Although GP's were willing to play an important role in presymptomatic DNA-testing procedures, there is a risk that they might underestimate the difficulties in communicating genetic information and the psychosocial effects of DNA-testing. Hence, we favor the premise that extensive pretest counselling and test disclosure should remain the prime responsibility of the clinical geneticist. Increasing involvement of GP's should, however, be encouraged and combined with appropriate postgraduate education about predictive DNA-testing in general.     

Mental health and quality of life after genetic testing for Huntington disease: a long-term effect study in Germany

Predictive genetic testing for Huntington disease (HD) might cause severe short-term psychological reactions in patients with poor mental health. Very few studies exist on the long-term effects of genetic HD testing. The aim of this study was to assess mental health and quality of life in persons who were tested for HD mutation, to compare mental health depending on the result of the genetic test (non-carriers, gene carriers, and patients with HD) and to identify predictors of mental health and quality of life via linear regression. The data were collected by self-report questionnaires. In total, 121 individuals participated in this study: 52 were non-carriers, 54 were gene carriers, and 15 were gene carriers suffering from HD. Non-carriers and gene carriers showed better mental health and quality of life than HD-patients but did not differ from each other. In non-carriers four variables predicted increased depression and low mental quality of life: low perceived social support, no intimate relationship, female sex and younger age. For gene carriers three predictors were found: low perceived social support, the expectation of an unfavorable genetic test result before the testing procedure and being childless. To prevent detrimental effects of HD testing on mental health and mental quality of life, specific attention should be paid to persons with limited social networks during genetic counseling. Assessment of expectations related to the test result and mental health prior to a genetic testing procedure may help to identify gene carriers at risk of poor coping after an unfavorable test result.     

Presymptomatic DNA testing for Huntington disease: Identifying the need for psychological intervention

In the Dutch presymptomatic DNA-testing program for Huntington disease (HD), 29 individuals with increased risk and 44 with decreased risk were followed-up 6 months after test results. A prognostic model was built aimed at identifying individuals at risk for psychological maladjustment, as measured by the Impact of Event Scale, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, the General Health Questionnaire, and the Social Support Questionnaire. Results: 1) The more that applicants suffered from intrusive feelings about HD and tried to avoid HD-related situations, prior to the test, the greater the chance that they will experience this 6 months after the test if they proved to be at increased risk; 2) the more that both individuals with increased risk and those with decreased risk who suffered from the threat of having HD tried to avoid HD-related situations prior to the test and the less satisfied they were with available support, the greater the probability that they will show avoidance behavior after the test; 3) the more pessimistic that individuals with increased risk as well as those with decreased risk were about their future prior to the test, the more they avoided HD-related situations and the more dissatisfied they were about their available support (pretest), the greater the probability that they will become depressive and suicidal. Psychological adjustment was also studied as a function of a) intrusion/denialavoidance pattern over time and b) healthy mental functioning/future expectancies. Most individuals with increased risk (86%) seem to cope well thus far, although this was based largely on strong psychological defenses and dependent on satisfactory relationships. Five individuals with increased risk (17%) had either health complaints and/or extreme pessimistic expectancies. They were not able to face the consequences of the test result and showed an increase of denial-avoidance behavior thereafter. Seven out of 9 individuals with decreased risk, identified as possible psychopathological cases with pessimistic expectancies, had less intrusive feelings than prior to the test. This group could later develop severe problems with detachment from their previous life style and also with adapting to their new genetic status. We conclude that DNA-testing has shown benefits for most tested individuals. However, a considerable number are at risk for maladjustment and should be offered additional help. Further studies as to whether the strong defenses in individuals with increased risk safeguard adequate adjustment in the long term should be undertaken. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.